IN THE EYE OF THE 'Holocaust' STORM

"The consequence of World War II did not create Zionism as an effective political movement: they merely gave Zionism the world political victory it needed for the final stage of the takeover of Palestine. All the world power had fallen to the U.S. and the Soviet Union, both of which were most friendly to the Zionist cause at this time. Under the circumstances, the Arab position was hopeless, because it depended on the firmness and political independence of a Britain that was almost prostrate politically and economically."
Professor Arthur Butz, in his 1979 classic: The Hoax of the Twentieth Century.

FT comment: That's why Iran attempts to rely upon its own resources and contacts, rather than on the US or anyone else.

___________________

1 December 2006

Talking about politics without talking about the Jews is absurd. The Jews invented modern politics and economics, whether it's Marxism or fractional reserve banking. The twentieth century was a Jewish century and was the story of Jewish triumph in America and Russia and all the wars that made it possible. Anglo-Saxon culture has been irretrievably wrecked and replaced by a godless nightmare of vacuous talmudic vulgarity and sophistry, by disfunctional womanhood, broken marriages, corrupted childhood, mongrelized culture, mass brainwashing enforcing the mute acceptance of almost any outrage and finally, enslavement by mountains of debt imposed by wars from the right and welfare from the left. However, the Jews may have met their match in Eurasia: Putin's pogrom of the oligarchs and China's alliance with Russia, combined with last year's declaration of the Chinese determination to save their independent banking system all represent shocks that far surpass that of Hitler, whom we now know to have been a puppet. - more

30 November 2006:

Would you be excited that your relative might be still alive and follow the leads provided by the stranger?

Imagine for a moment being the close relative of a rape and murder victim whose body was never found. Thanks to the testimonies of a number of witnesses, the authorities could establish that your relative was raped and murdered and the identity of the perpetrator. The witnesses also describe in gruesome detail how the accused disposed of the body without leaving any traces. As a result, in an emotional trial, the accused got sentenced to the maximum sentence. A few years later, a stranger approaches the police and newspapers claiming that it is impossible that the accused could have committed the alleged crimes. He argues that not only was it impossible – for a variety of reasons – that the accused could have committed the alleged crime in the way it was described by the witnesses, but that he has reasons to believe that the victim is still alive.

What would your reaction be?

Would you be excited that your relative might be still alive and follow the leads provided by the stranger? Would you be concerned that your relative was the cause for a miscarriage of justice? Or would you go onto a rampage accusing the stranger of condoning rape and murder and use all your power and influence to make sure he loses his career, his social network, even his freedom?

The narrative of the Jewish Holocaust, as it was reported to us in the years following the end of World War II, was and probably still is the most powerful political weapon in modern history. Not only did it eclipse reports of the destruction of up to 90% of private housing and infra-structure in Germany through Allied carpet bombing, resulting into the death of 650,000 civilians, the slaughter of over a million Germans and rampant gang ramps by the Communist Red Army, and the ethnic cleansing of millions of Eastern Germans, all actions – if considered on their own – would be regarded by most people as horrendous war crimes. It also mounted continued international support, particularly in the United States, for the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine, and became a goose that lays golden eggs for what Normal Finkelstein calls the ‘Holocaust industry’. Without the Holocaust, Israel would have never been created and could not have been sustained. It is its founding stone, its lifeline and its most powerful weapon.

The question, whether or not to include the Holocaust into the discussion surrounding the Palestinian question, is hotly disputed amongst pro-Palestinian activists. Some argue, that the Holocaust was too hard a nut to crack. It was so protected by powerful taboos and – in many countries – criminal laws, that it would be suicidal to touch the subject.

Other activists, like the author of this article, are convinced that if a sufficient number of educated people make known to the general public that there are indeed a number of facts that create a prima facie case for the claim that maybe there were no homicidal gas chambers and no systematic murder of millions of Jews, it will eventually create a critical mass of people demanding that historians and forensic scientists will be allowed to investigate the matter without fear of seeing their career destroyed or even be imprisoned.

If those ‘Holocaust deniers’ turn out to be right, the implications for the Middle-East will be massive. Suddenly, the public outcry over Israel’s treatment of the Palestinian people would no longer be suffocated by fears of being labelled an ‘anti-Semite’. No longer would Jewish lobby groups be able to position the Jews as ‘eternal victims’ and maintain that there was a need for a Jewish state ‘because of what happened in Nazi Germany’.

When Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called the Holocaust a myth and suggested to send a forensic team to Auschwitz to investigate whether in fact it was an extermination rather than a forced labour camp, he took a calculated risk. On the one hand, he knew that this suggestion would catapult him right at the top of the ‘most hated list’ of organized Jewry. On the other hand, he knew that the Holocaust is both Israel’s raison d’être and Achilles heel. If we can prove that the Holocaust was indeed the biggest hoax of the 20th century, as the father of holocaust revisionism Arthur Butz claims, that will spell the end of the Zionist project and its continued rape and humiliation of the Palestinian people.

Apartheid sucks – dismantle IsraHell!

Andrew Winkler
Editor/Publisher
ZioPedia - A Rebel Media Group Project