-----Original Message-----
From: Adelaide Institute - info@adelaideinstitute.org

Sent: Thursday, 18 January 2007 2:35 PM
To: joryr@adv.newsltd.com.au

Cc: Adelaide Institute
Subject: The Advertiser smear job on Fredrick Töben to come?


The Advertiser Columnist
Mr Rex Jory
Adelaide


Dear Rex

Bearing in mind that you and your staff have black-listed me in your
newspaper, I make public the following letter to you by sending it through
our email list and by placing it on Adelaide Institute's website. Thank God
for free expression on the Internet - still!

I have been advised that the Advertiser is preparing to run an article on me
that is designed to smear my family's reputation - to coincide with my
appearance on 6 February 2007 before the Federal Court of Australia where I
have to answer a contempt of court charge brought against me by Australia's
leading Zionist, journalist Jeremy Jones.

From personal experience I know you are good at this kind of thing, and I
think you may recall that my facing you at one of the South Australian Press
Club luncheons and advising you in no uncertain terms that what you had
written about me was below the belt. I think you said that I should
re-locate out of the State of South Australia, or something like that.

However, should there be some truth in this current assertion, then I would
request you not do anything like this.

I was advised that my 84-year-old mother would not survive such an attack.
Ironically, my mother knew Rupert Murdoch's sister who, until her death,
lived in the area where mother has her farm. I wonder how she would have
looked upon you and the staffers who have been assigned to this hatchet-job
on the Toben family's good name?

I say all this in the knowledge that as far as I am concerned there is
nothing surrounding my family's reputation of which we ought to be ashamed.
Of course, the 'Holocaust' allegation levelled against us are in this
respect a horrendous smear job on any German or anyone who has a German
background. After investigating the 'Holocaust' matter I conclude that it is
not just mere puffery but outright lies, hence my quest objectively to look
at the facts of such allegations. I wonder why you would resort to smearing
anyone who has an argument to present about the 'Holocaust'. Are you fearful
of losing your job, i.e. were you to run with my arguments? Why fall into
the trap of smearing someone whose views you do not like?

So, Rex, be a good boy and stay with the balanced approach, as you did in
today's column, 'Targeting Lara hypocritical nonsense', 18 January 2007.

Sincerely

Fredrick Töben

==================================

-----Original Message-----
From: Jory, Rex  joryr@adv.newsltd.com.au

Sent: Friday, 19 January 2007 7:41 AM
To: Adelaide Institute
Subject: RE: The Advertiser smear job on Fredrick Toben to come?

Dear Fred,
1. I am unaware of any black list which includes you - or anyone else for
that matter. I have not spoken directly to the editor but I would be very
surprised, extremely surprised, if there was any ban or constraint. Of
course there may be legal constraints involving the courts, but that is
quite different.
2. I am unaware of any plans to launch a smear campaign against you or your
family. Where this information came from I am not sure but it cannot,
reliably, have come from within this office because - at least to my
knowledge - no such proposal has been discussed. However, I am not privvy to
every decision.
It is likely we would, as a matter of course, report any public hearing but
that does not constitute a smear.
3. I have never suggested you re-locate out of South Australia. I may not
agree with all of your ideas but I would vigorously support your right to
assert them provided they were within the general laws of our community. On
the same basis, I think as a personality you add colour and even
intellectual vigour to our community.
4. You assert that I have been assigned to be part of a hatchet job on the
Toben family. That is simply not true. Returning to point two, I am unaware
of any such plans and I am certainly not involved in any such plan. No one
has spoken to me about your case. I was unaware until today that it was
approaching.
5. I object to your condescending references at the end of your e-mail ("be
a good boy etc"). That is hardly an adult way to discuss the issue.
Equally, raising some distant connection between your family and Rupert
Murdoch cuts no ice.
I repeat. I know nothing about any real or imagined smear campaign.
While I cannot categorically rule it out, nothing of this type has come to
my attention and if it was discussed I would probably counsel against it.
Rex Jory
 

Fredrick Toben replies:

Thank you, Rex, for your reply, and I am sorry if the 'good boy' reference
upset you. It was not meant to be condescending but rather designed to take
the sting out of the seriousness of the email content.

Fredrick

****

From: James Damon jdamon@austintx.net

Sent: Friday, 19 January 2007 5:01 AM
To: Adelaide Institute
Cc: joryr@adv.newsltd.com.au

Subject: Advertiser Smear Job

Dear Mr. Toben,

I just read your interesting message, which was forwarded by a friend
at the University of Texas.
The situation you describe is very similar to the situation we face
locally with our daily newspaper monopoly "The Austin American
Statesman" which refuses to print letters skeptical of "Holocaust"
allegations.

It is striking that newspapers as far apart as Australia and Texas
should share in such a concerted effort to defend the sanctity of the
"Holocaust Industry" as Prof. Finkelstein calls it (or "Shoa Business"
as less generous Jewish critics of Zionism call it.)

Prof. F. presumably has considerable knowledge of the subject since
both his parents were interned at Auschwitz during the War.
He points out that according to the laws of actuarial science, there
would be around 40,000 "Holocaust" survivors if the Germans had
murdered 6 million Jews, including all those too young to work; yet
the Prime Minister of Israel reports that around a million survivors
are still alive, for whom the German government continues to pay
billions of dollars in compensation.

Alas, as Prof. Finkelstein points, very little of this compensation
reaches the actual "survivors."

A rational person of average intelligence cannot fail to notice a
discrepancy between the figures of 40,000 and a million "survivors,"
surely enough to warrant objective inquiry.

One would expect real old fashioned journalists to rush to
investigate!

The impartial observer notices that the criminalization of such
investigations is acknowledgement that the more the public learns
about "Holocaust," the more skeptical it becomes.

Yours for real history,

J M Damon
Austin Texas