|
|
|
|
|
|
THE TERRIBLE and unjustified BLOOD LIBEL continues...
In 1994 Professor Deborah Lipstadt visited Australia with the latest news about the authenticity of the Auschwitz-Birkenau homicidal gas chambers story, and offered proof thereof. She celebrated the work of Jean Claude Pressac who had finally presented the blueprints of the homicidal gas chambers in his large book. Today 'Holocaust' believers don't wish to remember Pressac's book, and REVISIONISTS can't remember its title either. It has become irrelevant. And yet in 1994 a copy in the security section of The University of Melbourne's library was available for a time, which Geoff Muirden and I viewed with interest. We did not come away from viewing the Pressac book, convinced it proved the existence of the homicidal gas chambers because the various 'blueprints' did not prove the existence of the homicidal gas chambers. Professor Deborah Lipstadt went on to celebrate her 'victory' over David Irving in that 2000 London defamation trial. It was an empty victory for her because Irving is not a HOLOCAUST REVISIONIST - he believes that limited gassings occurred, something that Prof Robert Faurisson scoffs at by making his famous uncompromising statement: 'THE HOLOCAUST IS A LIE!', something I have been forbidden to state in public, unless I wish to be in breach of the 2002 Federal Court of Australia Order that prevents me from doubting the 'Holocaust', among other things.
Laurence Rees: Auschwitz: The Nazis & The Final Solution, BBC BOOKS, 2005, ISBN 0 563 52117 1
Based on his 2005 TV series screened on BBC 2, Laurence Rees - Creative Director of History Programmes for BBC Television - presents the latest 'official' version of events. He is lucky because almost no-where on earth is it permitted openly and publicly to present the REVISIONIST case.
Rees does not mention Lipstadt or Pressac, and he refers to 'Holocaust deniers' but does not mention Butz, Faurisson, Zündel, Rudolf, et al.
The latter two are currently subjected to the mechanism of intimidation-legal persecution used by those who control the 'Holocaust' narrative - both imprisoned for refusing to believe in the 'Holocaust' story. Zündel's trial begins on 8 November 2005, and Rudolf's situation is as yet not determined. Siegfried Verbeke's current situation is also unclear, whether he is still being held at Amsterdam Airport where he was on his way with his wife to the Phlillipines.
The Rees TV series is currently screening - October-November 2005 - on Australia's public broadcaster ABC TV. It is staggering how the series makes claims of German barbarism and gets away with it. The mechanism of lies is clear:
1. through eye-witness reports fabricate to inject cruelties into the narrative that never existed, then
2. exaggerate and distort the story, and
3. top it off through outright lying. It is in this final step that the fabricators usually come undone because they have overstepped their own hubris as their imagination runs wild.
Antony Beevor, author of Stalingrad and Berlin, the Downfall 1945, endorses Laurence Rees's efforts thus:
'An important contribution to our understanding of the Second World War ... Rees's great urge to comprehend the mentality of the SS camp administrators and guards is fired not just by a passionate curiosity, but by an intellectual honesty that the subject badly needs'.
This 'curiosity', it is assumed, cannot be attributed to REVISIONISTS, such as Ernst Zündel, Germar Rudolf, Arthur Butz, Robert Faurisson, et al. REVISIONISTS are supposed to be driven by much baser motives. That REVISIONISTS are legally persecuted speaks for itself because their message threatens the upholders of the 'Holocaust' story. It is a truism that TRUTH stands on its own and does not need legal protection, while lies need to be protected if they are needed to uphold a belief, an ideology, a creed.
The REVISIONIST influence is evident within Rees's reflection on Auschwitz. The following is one striking example that can be found in the book where the author rationalises away - misinterprets - matters that REVISIONISTS have been pointing out for decades. That Rees has to respond, re-interpret and twist basic facts without substantive open debate is an indication that the 'Holocaust' believers are on the run - desperately clinging to legal mechanisms in the hope of saving their personal distorted belief system as it pertains to Auschwitz and the belief that sophisticated and culturally highly developed Germans systematically exterminated European Jewry in homicidal gas chambers.
=====
Basic Premise on which the 'HOLOCAUST' rests
The 'Holocaust' story rests on three legally protected pillars:
1. Six million Jews died in the 'Holocaust' - total deaths figure remains constant as numbers are revised.
2. The German state systematically exterminated European Jewry - the German blood libel.
3. Chemical slaughterhouses, specifically constructed homicidal gas chambers - the murder weapon.
Brothel and Swimming Pool, and the Höss confession
1. For decades REVISIONISTS of have pointed out that at Auschwitz-Stammlager there was a brothel and a swimming pool that was never shown to tourists. Dietlieb Felderer took hundreds of photos detailing the subtle changes made at the swimming pool, and David McCalden's video of the swimming pool is still relevant today. Whenever REVISIONISTS mentioned the swimming pool it would elicit sniggers from 'Holocaust' believers, suggesting that REVISIONIST are of unsound mind.
2. Likewise, in 1996, Robert Jan van Pelt/Deborah Dwork in their book Auschwitz From 1270 To The Present, de-commissioned the alleged homicidal gas chamber at Auschwitz I - Stammlager. It was admitted that what is shown to tourists 'symbolically' represents the gassings that occurred at Auschwitz-Birkenau, in particular at Krema II.
3. And then, of course, there is Fritjof Meyer's 2002 controversial work [Meyer, Fritjof, 'Die Zahl der Opfer von Auschwitz – Neue Erkenntnisse durch neue Archivfunde', in: Osteuropa – Zeitschrift für Gegenwartsfragen des Ostens, published by Deutschen Gesellschaft für Osteuropakunde, 52. Jahrgang, May 2002, ISSN 0030-6428, p. 631 ff.] - who has de-commissioned the Auschwitz-Birkenau homicidal gas chambers - and placed them in two fictitious farm houses; and he reduces the 1.5 million death figure to around 500.000.
4. In 1988, during the Ernst Zündel Toronto 'Holocaust' trial, The Leuchter Report evidence was so compelling that the upholders of the 'Holocaust' narrative were panic-stricken, and the REVISIONISTS exuberant.
5. This, together with the Soviet Union's return of the Auschwitz death books, caused the administration quietly to remove the 20 plaques with the 4 million death figure at Auschwitz-Birkenau, and a few years later these were replaced with the now reduced figure of 1.-1.5 million - all this without explanation, and without reducing the overall SIX MILLION claimed deaths.
6. German authorities have refused legally to pursue Meyer for offending against Section 130 of Germany's Criminal Code that makes it an offence to doubt the 'Holocaust', in particular to question the existence of the homicidal gas chambers and the six million deaths figure.
7. The German 'Offenkundigkeit' - judicial notice - of the 'Holocaust' has thereby been demolished, and this causes a legal dilemma whereby in a recent case involving 78-year-old Günter Kögel HOLOCAUST judges claimed that it does not matter if the facts are not correct - denial still occurred, and that suffices for a conviction. It is Horst Mahler's hope that by using Fritjof Meyer's public statements the current prevailing 'Offenkundigkeit' of the 'Holocaust' will be revised.
Laurence Rees states the following:
Nothing demonstrates more effectively the immense power of context in human relations than Dacko's apparently callous statement that they 'just had to do their job'. For in the context of Auschwitz, where torture and murder were commonplace, it was possible for him to see the life of a woman in the brothel as a 'good' life. And, with so much other suffering around him, it clearly never occurred to him to ask, 'Ought I to be having sex with this woman?' Instead, it is clear what was on his mind - that he had endured 'three and a half years without a woman' and here was his opportunity to put the situation right.
There is another difficulty with the existence of the brothel at Auschwitz. Holocaust deniers and other apologists for the Nazis seize upon its presence as evidence that Auschwitz was a very different place from that painted in conventional historiography. This problem is especially stark when combined with knowledge of the so-called 'swimming pool' at Auschwitz main camp. in reality this was a water storage tank over which the firemen had fixed a makeshift diving board, but selected inmates were certainly able to bathe in it. 'There was a swimming pool in Auschwitz for the fire brigade,' confirms Ryszard Dacko. 'I could even swim there.' This facility has become one of the totems of the Holocaust deniers' case. 'This is supposed to be a death camp?' they say. 'With a swimming pool for inmates? Come off it!' but in reality its existence fits into the same pattern as that of the brothel. instead of showing how Auschwitz was not a centre for mass murder, which it undeniably was, the presence of these two institutions demonstrates once again the complex make-up of the various camps that together constituted 'Auschwitz'.
The many different hierarchical structures and purposes of the various camps within the Auschwitz complex have allowed the Holocaust deniers to focus on so-called anomalies such as these. There were myriad variations - from the 'swimming pool' and brothel at one end of the spectrum to the crematoria and murder of children at the other. It was the very complexity of Auschwitz as an institution that made the place so appealing to Himmler in 1943, and makes it such a focus of the Holocaust deniers' attentions today. - p.204-205.
Rees on Hoess
There are Holocaust deniers who point to the abuse Hoess suffered at the hands of British soldiers immediately following his arrest and claim that this discredits his confession... - p.293.
Robert Faurisson has written enough about this matter, which makes Rees's comments on the Höss tragedy trivial, if not irrelevant. Interestingly, Rudolf Hess is not mentioned and this merely confirms the unbalanced nature of the mind that wrote the book, Auschwitz: The Nazis & the Final Solution.
Ress falls victim to his own premise when he writes:
By spring 1943 it was obvious to men like Himmler that the only installation in the Nazi empire capable of satisfactorily uniting the twin goals of work and murder was Auschwitz. Thus the crematoria/gas chambers of Birkenau were the hub of a huge semi-industrial complex. Here selected Jews could first be sent to work at one of a large number of sub-camps nearby, and then, when they were deemed no longer fit to work after months of appalling mistreatment, they could be transported a few miles to the extermination facilities of Auschwitz-Birkenau. p 179
The current estimate is that of the 1.3 million people sent to Auschwitz, 1.1 million died there. A staggering 1 million of them were Jews ...It must always be remembered that more than 90 per cent of those who lost their lives at Auschwitz did so because the one 'crime' they had committed in Nazi eyes was to be born Jewish ... Soon the last survivor and the last perpetrator from Auschwitz will have joined those who were murdered at the camp. There will be no one on this earth left alive who has personal experience of the place. And when that happens there is a danger that this history will merge into the distant past and become just one terrible event amongst many ... Maybe future generations will see Auschwitz the same way - as just another bad thing that happened in the past, before living memory. But that should not be allowed to happen. We must judge behaviour by the context of the times. And judged by the context of mid-twentieth century, sophisticated European culture, Auschwitz and the Nazis' 'Final Solution' represents the lowest act in all history. By their crime the Nazis brought into the world an awareness of what educated, technologically advanced human beings can do, as long as they possess a cold heart. Once allowed into he world, knowledge of what they did must not be unleart. It lies there - ugly, inert, waiting to be rediscovered by each new generation. A warning for us, and for those who will come after. - p.301-2.
Is Rees here talking about the Anglo-American-Zionist attacks on Iraq, or about the Jewish ethnic cleansing of Palestine? - not to mention how Germans were systematically killed after the war, and former German territories, such as Königsberg, were ethnically cleansed of Germans. The same mindset that wanted World War Two now operates in ethnically cleansing Palestine of Palestinians.
Will Laurence Ress do a balancing program on this tragedy perpetrated by the Anglo-American-Zionist political movement that fights for 'freedom and democracy', opposes 'terrorism' and celebrates 'predatory capitalism'?
For a refreshing view of the above matter I recommend Michael Collins Piper's The High Priests of War: The Secret History of How America's "Neo-Conservative"Trotskyites Came to Power and Orchestrated the War Against Iraq as the First Step in Their Drive for Global Empire. 2004, ISBN 0 9745484 1 3. Obtainable from www.americanfreepress.net.
A VOICE FROM THE MIDDLE EAST
From:
cherifo1
Sent: Wednesday, 26 October 2005 8:23 AM
To:
Undisclosed-Recipient:@EQUULEUS.wyith.com
Subject: Fw: ''A Tight Fit''
Hi Joe
A large Foot-Ball stadium has the capacity of one hundred thousand people,
( 100' 000 ) when you look at a stadium from a bird's eye, you see people
packed and covering the whole area around the field, now if you want to
burn all the people in that stadium , how much fuel you need and how much
time ??
Now think that the Zionists Jews are talking about six millions ( 6' 000'
000 ) that is to say sixty ( 60 ) full of people Foot-ball stadiums.
Not two or three , not even ten or twenty, but SIXTY ....
I think it does not need any comments .
Cherif
----- Original Message -----
From: GiuseppeFurioso@aol.com
To:
jacobandesau@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 2:46 PM
Subject: ''A Tight Fit''
In Heritage: Civilization and the Jews, Abba Eban quotes a
Treblinka eyewitness as follows: ''Into the chamber of twenty-five square
meters 450 to 500 people were jammed. The congestion was unbelievable''.
Yes it was, and still is unbelievabe! 450 to 500 people in a room twenty
five square meters averages out to twenty people per square meter, which
of course is impossible, unless the alleged victims were only as big as
squirrels. The name of this ''eyewitness'' is not given but I suspect his
testimony was relied upon to justify the execution of numerous Germans
following WWll.
This is not some isolated absurdity. In a pamphlet published by the ADL,
Holocaust Denial: A Pocket Guide we read the following on p. 11, ''
Working with chambers measuring an average 225sq.ft., the Nazis forced to
their deaths 700 to 800 men women and children at a time''. For this a
source is given, Nora Levin's 'The Holocaust'. My living room is
larger than these typical Nazi gas chambers, it measures 14x22 or 308 sq.
ft. Recently I had a gathering of about twenty people, and while it is
true that I wasn't gassing them, it was rather crowded and many of my
guests ''spilled " over into my dining room and den. joe
=================
From: cherifo1
Sent: Wednesday, 26 October 2005 12:04 AM
I can answer at least one question,
The Golden Calf was made with the Gold the Jews stole from the Egyptians.
The name Mou-sa ( Moses) comes from two pharaonic names "Mou " which means
water and " sa " which means son , the translation of the name Mousa is
the " son of water".
Cherif loutfi
Cairo-Egypt
============
From: cherifo1
Cc: pns-owner@yahoogroups.com ; elcm@messiahsbranch.org ;
robbie891@hotmail.com ; clkates@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 3:26 PM
Subject: This is a letter addressed to Ms Kates, thanking her for standing by what is right
This is a letter to Ms Kates, thanking her for standing for what is right.
If life is so magnificent in the Apartheid State of Israel can anyone tell me why is that every day thousands and thousands of Israelis cross the borders of occupied Palestine and pour into the Egyptian Sinai ?
Please read the article below as it should be written.
Cherif Loutfi
Cairo-Egypt
===================
----- Original Message -----
From: Cal Steinberger
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 3:56 PM
Subject: Fw: [pns] THIS ONE IS ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, AND WORTH READING AND SENDING ON.
Folks:
I am sending this "rebuttal" to all of you, ONLY BECAUSE Dennis Robertson has been such a good friend for such a long time. He is a good example, however, of how some of our good Christian friends have been hoodwinked by their pastors into unconditionally supporting the Zionist state of Israel, believing that it is "Biblically inspired by God". And, his remark that "all Arabs should be eradicated from the face of the earth", is completely "out in left field"! Shame on you Dennis! I have never in my life said that "all Jews are bad"! Why don't you learn how to read! Come see me when you can, and, let’s have lunch together.
Regards,
Cal
From: "Dennis Robertson" <robbie891@hotmail.com>
To: <cals@valornet.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 8:03 PM
Subject: FW: [pns] THIS ONE IS ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, AND WORTH READING AND SENDING ON.
Cal, why don't you read this and wake up!! Your anti semitic views need to change, are you afraid of the real truth. There are bad people from every nation. The Arab Muslim people that YOU think are so mistreated should be eradicated from the face of the earth, not the Jews, it is a shame that you refuse to accept that THEY are GOD’s chosen people. Send me NO anti Jewish hate material.
Send this out to your email list and let them judge!
Dennis
From: "messiahsbranch.org" <elcm@messiahsbranch.org>
Reply-To: pns-owner@yahoogroups.com
To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@ladle.dreamhost.com>
Subject: [pns] THIS ONE IS ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, AND WORTH READING AND SENDING ON.
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:50:41 -0500
Received by email without a URL
Charlotte Kates is the pro-terrorist law student at Rutgers Univ. who organized the pro-Palestinian conference and defends suicide bombers...
THIS ONE IS ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT, AND WORTH READING AND SENDING ON.
The following letter was written to the President of Rutgers State
University by an Israeli citizen after reading Kates' published comments
on the Israeli /Palestinian situation!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
© free 2004 Adelaide Institute
