One of the Left speakers at the Sydney conference on September 28-9 was Peter
Whitworth, a diesel engineer, horticulturalist, and irrigation specialist.

He said that he first went to work in Iraq in 1983, and was surprised to find
it a prosperous and very well-governed country. Saddam had a firm hand, but
that was necessary to maintain order. Women were free to dress as they
pleased, except for wearing shorts, but men were not allowed to wear shorts
either. And the Iraqi women were very beautiful. Everyone was friendly to him.
They loved their children and their country.

He said that prior to Saddam's invasion of Kuwait, the Kuwaitis had been
angle-drilling into Iraq's aquifers.

Iraq's WMD were supplied to it by the West during the Iraq-Iran war. Saddam
was at fault in that war, but the two sides were fighting over a very small
piece of territory, and Kissinger later  revealed that the US was maintaining
the arms supply to both sides so that they could do as much damage to each
other as possible.

Apart from Iraq, he worked in Laos (during the Vietnam War), and in many other
Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia. Whereas the Islamic world is generally
divided into Sunnis and Shiites, in Saudi Arabia about 60% of the people
belong to the Wahhabi sect. Officers patrol the streets in cars looking for
women showing a bit of ankle, and tap them with a stick as a reminder to cover up.

In a variant of Henry Makow's line, David Livingstone argues (item 4) that the
"British" or the Illuminati are behind Islamic terrorism. My view is that
while the CIA supported Islamic activists against the USSR, and in the breakup
of Yugoslavia, it's more likely that Mossad is behind 911. Sure, Moslems let
bombs off around the world, but 911 was a hundredfold more sophisticated than
that, and the result has suited Israel's goals (destruction of Iraq) rather
than America's (oil revenue), because the pipelines are being bombed continuously.

1. More fan mail
2. Fan mail
3. Not a British conspiracy
4. Globalists and the Creation of the Wahhabi Terrorism, by David Livingstone
5. Moussaoui  - In His Own Words [Announce]
6. Front landing gear strut of what hit the Pentagon - not a Boeing 757
7. 911 In plane site DVD zone coding
8. Party of Islamic Deliverance - scapegoats in Uzbekistan
9. 20 Israeli firms tapped Olympics' $1.5 billion security budget

1. More fan mail - please don't reply directly to him
swearing is no substitute for debate
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:16:52 +1000 From: "John Reisner" <johnr@knp.com.au>
To: Peter Myers <myers@cyberone.com.au>

Swearing just adds emphasis. You are grabbing at straws and using "swearing"
to avoid answering because like any prejudice, you have no answer other than
your bigotry, but just want to palm it off as "inquiry" and "raising
questions" blah, blah blah. Nothing is more hateful to someone than when
reason is used against their argument.

You're an idiot. Just about every country has a foreign debt and has shipped
jobs overseas. Are you saying that that is the Jews' fault as well?? So now it
is because America ISN'T rich and powerful enough to the extent of your
trumped up economic ratios that you think proves something?? You are bigger
moron that on even first inspection. Just like any fool, the more he talks the
better the confirmation of his stupidity. So if America is not so rich and
powerful then why do the Jews "want to control it" and aren't they stupid for
"wanting" to do so?? And so if America is not so important then what the fuck
do you care if the Jews "control it" according to you? What happens to your
fucking thesis then?? You are such a fucking dimwit you are all over the
fucking place. A sixth grader could make a more cogent argument than a total
loser like you. But you haven't said what's wrong with the Jews running
America, as if idiots like you could do better. The premise that Jews running
anything is bad is the basis of your bigotry but you have not proven that it
is bad, you just say it is because it amplifies your hatreds. Like the
Catholic Church was better at running things when it did??? The sun moves
around the earth and all that crap. Progress was measured in how much control
was taken away from the fucking Church. You're a complete luddite.

If the Jews ran America, as you say, arseholes like you would be expunged. Yet
everyone who disseminates slander against the Jews, that they want to control
the world etc. etc. still doesn't fear any consequence for their slander. Why
is that? Its because they don't believe it. It's because they know the
opposite, that the Jews are few in number and easy to be used as a vent for
their hatred and real agenda. Why don't you start saying Muslims are subhuman
and should be exterminated, let's see how long you last then?? You use Jews
because there is no reprisal risk and it satisfies your creed of hatred. Your
real agenda is to use this classical means to give vent to your hatreds. You
want to give your hatred a specious reason, something that looks and sounds
good. There are no Jews in Poland, but I bet that if you go around Poland
today and ask "who runs Poland?" a high percentage will say, "the Jews"!!!

But what;'s the point of telling a fool the obvious. You'll find something
else. Try, maybe the Jews' run China!!

Of course, everything wrong in the world is because of the Jews, it's just so
simple for you fuckers. You miscreants are engaged in total psychological
projection. All your human failings are not your own, you cunts are perfect,
it's the Jews' fault that you are bald, fat and stupid and its their fault for
everything else in your miserable lives that you have fucked up. What a loser,
you are incapable of seeing how stupid you are because you have the insight of
a mule. When the head of CAIR (a Muslim organisation in the US) openly says
that their intention is to take over the US and when Muslims say that they
actually do want to take over the world as their stated aim, fuckheads like
you are still fixated on the Jews. You pricks vilify and want to kill the Jews
and then you deify and worship one of their number. You people love
contradictions that's why you are so mystified by reason and why idiotic
things seem so "reasonable" to you mules. You want to control everthing but
don't have control over your own emotions or the boundaries of your own
stupidity.

Because, and this proves your anti-Semitic credentials, a vice in the hands of
a non-Jew is no vice, but when a Jew is said either to possess this same
"vice" (thing) or in fact also has it, you use that as "proof" of Jewish
criminality or some such. You thus, de-humanise the Jew in order to be able to
murder him without compunction, because as we all know, murder is your
ultimate objective. You live in an IQ paradise populated by retards. You think
this has not been tried before????

You are the flat earth society. Nothing can avert your bigotry because you are
too stupid, ignorant and twisted to be or do anything else. You want to be a
bigot, but not an "anti-Semitic" bigot because that term is too loaded and
discredited. You want to be an anti-Semite but without the label. How stupid
is that. You think that by using euphemisms that this adds cogency to an
argument? You think that if you actively avoid the charge of "anti-Semite"
then that makes every other part of your argument "logical" or "sensible".
What an idiot. Call it whatever you want you moronic dickhead.

Jews run the US. HA. If they did there would would not be any arabs left in
the world or jerks like you. When the US wanted to sell F15's and AWACS to
Saudia Arabia, all the Jews pulling strings couldn't stop that deal. Is that
why the US provided over $13 billions in aid to the enemies of the Jews in the
90's. Is that why untold billions are being spent rebuilding Iraq because the
Jews control America??? HA and HA. The Jews would rather see them rot.

Even if the whole fucking congress was Jewish do you think that anything could
be done for Jewish interests that was COUNTER to American ones??? Your
complaint is, as above. American interests that converge with Jewish ones must
not be allowed. Jews must not benefit from anything. Jews are not allowed
interests, not allowed to pursue them, not allowed to do anything, in fact
Jews are not allowed to breath, right? You fuckers are so stupid. You try and
line up your interests with the big bear on the block, not counter to them. So
when American interests converge with France does that mean the French run
America or the world??? Of course, the French are allowed and eligible to run
the world, because they are not Jewish. HA. Words fail to describe just how
fucking stupid you are. You can't see the nose on your fucking face.

And since you can't provide any answers or "debate", swearing at you is all
that's left you pathetic, miserable dope. If there is a Hell, you're gonna be
going to it. What other useless little device will you use hereafter? Are your
sensibilities all hurt so you will excuse yourself even further?? tsk tsk. You
have nothing to say, that makes any sense. Of course you're an anti-Semite,
your just too stupid to figure even that much out. Do everyone and yourself a
favour, drop dead - or better still, eat shit and die.

{end}  Please don't reply directly to "John Reisner".

REPLY (Peter M):

John,

Israel Shamir, in his article called Midas Ears at
http://www.israelshamir.net/english/midasears.html, wrote:

<<the Jews enter a dialogue berserk-like, with great vehemence, quite foreign
to the Socratic style. While sane people are satisfied with quoting their
opponent and fighting his arguments, madmen (for berserk is a temporarily-mad
individual) go for the jugular."

That is what you are doing.

In the Socratic style, we have a "live and let live" approach.

<<If the Jews ran America, as you say, arseholes like you would be expunged.>>

That's what Political Correctness is. Yes, people are waking up to the
genoicidal mentality within Judaism.

<< Jews run the US. HA. If they did there would would not be any arabs left in
the world or jerks like you.>>

Furtunately Jews are forced to be back-seat drivers at present, acting through
puppets like Bush. Let's hope their power does not increase because, to go by
your own words, the rest of us would then be in danger.

As for getting rid of Arabs, the War on Terror seems to be an attempt to do
just that.

2. Fan mail
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:58:57 +0500 From: "Eric Walberg" <eric@albatros.uz>

In answer to John Reisner's question:

>What is it that Jews do that is unfair, exactly?

Please read Israel Shamir's excellent detailed study of just this question
Pardes at http://www.israelshamir.net

I love how M Reisner's letter begins politely (with the odd grammar mistake)
and quickly descends into f**k this and f**k that. Ha, ha! Hit a nerve. Touche.

>What the fuck has Judaism ever done to you?

Ah, ha! Mr Reisner lets his secular slip show. What religion Jew could
juxtapose f**k and J***m together so easily. Thank you for proving our
suspicions that Judaism has nothing to do with spirituality, Mr Reisner.

Re Kristoffer Larsson's assurances that

>the Jewish elite will probably never be as powerful in the future as it is today

Thank heavens for little mercies!

3. Not a British conspiracy
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:24:19 +0500 From: "Iskandar Sahib" <iskandar38@hotmail.com>

Why do you shame the name of the Great Britain? After all it was the Jewish
takeover through the Dutch invasion 1688 that led to Britian being used as a
centre for the furtherance of Jewish globalist aims. And while today
Anglo-American neo-liberalism is having its hey day, and the City of London
may still be one of the premier financial centres of the world, after all, we
don't have an empire any more, and our Royal Family has come under severe
attack by the forces of globalism. Then one would have to say, it's not a
British conspiracy at all, it is a conglomeration of Jewish power and
Illuminati. ...? Even USA, which is the present pawn of zionism is perhaps
little more than that, a pawn in the game, which could be easily discarded as
soon as it ceases to be useful....?
{end}

REPLY (Peter M):

Here is Cecil Rhodes' will, in which he sets out the goal of reincorporating
the US into the British Empire:

John Flint, Cecil Rhodes, (Hutchinson, London, 1976)

{p. 248} Rhodes' "Confession of Faith" of 1877

... if we had retained America there would at this moment be millions more of
English living. Just fancy those parts that are at

{p. 249} present inhabited by the most despicable specimens of human beings
what an alteration there would be if they were brought under Anglo-Saxon
influence ... every acre added to our territory means in the future birth to
some more of the English race ... Added to this the absorption of the greater
portion of the world under our rule simply means the end of all wars ...

Having these ideas what scheme could we think of to forward this object. I
look into history and I read the story of the Jesuits I see what they were
able to do in a bad cause and I might say under bad leaders.

In the present day I became a member of the Masonic order ...

Why shold we not form a secret society with but one object the furtherance of
the British Empire and the bringing of the whole uncivilised world under
British rule for the recovery of the United States for the making the
Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire.

 ... think of those countless 000's of Englishmen that during the last 100
years would have crossed the Atlantic and settled and populated the United
States. Would they have not made without any prejudice a finer country of it
than the low class Irish and German emigrants? All this we have lost and that
country loses owing to whom? Owing to two or three ignorant pig-headed
statesmen of the last century, at their door lies the blame. Do you

{p. 250} ever feel mad? do you ever feel murderous. I think I do with those men.

... It is our duty to seize every oportunity of acquiring more territory ...
more territory simply means more of the Anglo-Saxon race more of the best the
most human, most honourable race the world possesses.

To forward such a scheme what a splendid help a secret society would be a
society not openly acknowledged but who would work in secret for such an object.

 ... Let us form the same kind of society a Church for the extension of the
British Empire.

{end} More at http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/rhodes-will.html

Here is Rhodes agreeing that the headquarters of the
British-Empire-plus-America conglomerate could be in the US:

Carroll Quigley, The Anglo-American Establishment: From Rhodes to Cliveden,
(Books In Focus, New York, 1981)

{p. 38} The secret society, after so much preliminary talk, took form in 1891,
the same year in which Rhodes drew up his fourth will and made Stead as well
as Lord Rothschild the trustee of his fortune. It is perfectly clear from the
evidence that he expected Lord Rothschild to handle the financial investments
associated with the trust, while Stead was to have full charge of the methods
by which the funds were used. About the same time, in February 1891, Stead and
Rhodes had another long discussion about the secret society. First they
discussed their goals and agreed that, if necessary in order to achieve
Anglo-American unity, Britain should join the United States.

{end} More at http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/quigley.html

The United States being a republic, and Britain a monarchy, "Britain joining
the US" means that the combined entity could be monarchic, or republican, or a
bit of each (George Bush snr is an honorary KBE, Elizabeth Taylor an Honorary
DBE} without this making any difference.

Nor need the fact that Britain had a formal Empire, and the US only an
informal one (what was the Philippines, if not a colony?) make any difference.
After all, Rhodes' society was a secret one, and the UKUSA Pact, under which
British, US & Australian forces are in Iraq, is never publicly acknowledged by
politicians, nor put to the public for ratification. So there are informal
structures operating beneath the formal ones.

And within Rhodes' empire, operates a Jewish one, which has largely kicked out
the Anglo-Saxon racism Rhodes intended as the foundation, and replaced it with
two factions of Judaism - International Socialism and Zionism - each of which
detests the other, but each of which covers for the other, suppressing the
Jewish factor from public discourse.

Wells belonged to the International Socialist faction. Here he expounds the
plan to make the Empire Multicultural ("a brotherhood of world rulers"):

H. G. Wells, The Open Conspiracy, in H. G. Wells, The Open Conspiracy and
Other Writings (no publisher identified, London, 1933).

{p. 58} XII THE RESISTANCES OF THE LESS INDUSTRIALIZED PEOPLES TO THE DRIVE OF
THE OPEN CONSPIRACY

India, China, Russia, Africa present melanges of social systems ... subjugated
by the finance, machinery, and political aggressions of the Atlantic, Baltic,
and Mediterranean civilization. ... But what they take from the West is mainly
the new developments, the material achievements, rather than the social and
political achievements ... Their nationalism will remain largely indigenous
... They will have their own resistances to the Open Conspiracy, therefore,
but they will be different resistances from those we have hitherto considered.
The automobile and the wireless set, the harvester and steel construction
building, will come to the jungle rajah and the head hunter, the Brahmin and
the Indian peasant, with a parallel and yet dissimilar message to the one they
brought the British landowner or the corn and cattle farmers of the Argentine
and the Middle West. Also they may be expected to evoke dissimilar reactions.

To a number of the finer, more energetic minds of these overshadowed
communities which have lagged more or less in the material advances to which
this present ascendancy of western Europe and America is due,

{p. 59} the Open Conspiracy may come with an effect of immense invitation. At
one step they may go from the sinking vessel of their antiquated order, across
their present conquerors, into a brotherhood of world rulers. They may turn to
the problem of saving and adapting all that is rich and distinctive of their
inheritance to the common ends of the race. But to the less vigorous
intelligences of this outer world, the new project of the Open Conspiracy will
seem no better than a new form of Western envelopment, and they will fight a
mighty liberation as though it were a further enslavement to the European
tradition. They will watch the Open Conspiracy for any signs of conscious
superiority and racial disregard. Necessarily they will recognize it as a
product of Western mentality {Jewish or Hellenistic?} and they may well be
tempted to regard it as an elaboration and organization of current
dispositions rather than the evolution of a new phase which will make no
discrimination at last between the effete traditions of either East or West.

... so far the clash of the East and West may be found to subserve the aims of
the Open Conspiracy. In the conflict of old traditions and in the consequent
deadlocks lies much hope for the direct acceptance of the groups of ideas
centring upon the Open Conspiracy.

{end} More at http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/opencon.html

Wells on population movement in a borderless world:

H. G . Wells, After Democracy (London, Watts & Co., 1932):

{p. 200} Nor do I think the races of mankind are going to devour one another.
There is not going to be any great overrunning of peoples. The climatic
regions of the earth determine the character of their human populations. The
negro did not capture tropical Africa; tropical Africa made him and gave
herself to him: for keeps, I think. The brownish peoples again hold the
sub-tropical world by virtue of their superior adaptation to that world;
similarly the whites the rainy temperate zone, and the Mongols dry Asia. So it
seems to me. There may be a lot of marginal admixture; there may be
replacement with altered conditions: but my World Dictatorship at any rate
will be untroubled by the nightmare of racial swarmings. Men in the coming
future will find that when they are free to move wherever they choose about
our planet they will for the most part stay in the habitats congenial to them.

{end} More at http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/hgwells.html

Wells presents a three-stage policy: 1. colonisation by Europeans and the
Christian religion 2. decolonisation: the attack on stage 1, an attack mounted
by the USSR but supported by the Open Conspiracy 3. recolonisation on a
non-racial basis, by a new elite selected from all countries.

Trotsky on mass migration:

Joseph Nedava, Trotsky and the Jews (The Jewish Publication Society of
America, Philadelphia, 5732/1972):

{p. 205} Socialism will open the possibility of great migrations on the basis
of the most developed technique and culture. It goes without saying that what
is here involved is not compulsory displacements, that is, the creation of new
ghettos for certain nationalities, but displacements freely consented to, or
rather demanded, by certain nationalities or parts of nationalities. The
dispersed Jews who would want to be reassembled in the same community will
find a sufficiently extensive and rich spot under the sun. The same
possibility will be opened for the Arabs, as for all other scattered nations.
National topography will become a part of the planned economy. This is the
great historic perspective as I see it. To work for international Socialism
means to work also for the solution of the Jewish question.

{end} More at http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/nedava.html

4. Globalists and the Creation of the Wahhabi Terrorism, by David Livingstone
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:27:01 -0000 From: "atoyuma" <atoyuma@yahoo.com>
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2181
by David Livingstone, author of The Dying God: The Hidden History of Western Civilization.

The West and Islam have had a long era of compatibility, but this history has
been denied to foster the myth of a "Clash of Civilizations". In order to
inflame the sentiments of the West against Islam, our attention has been
focused on the specter of fanatical Wahhabism, and more specifically, its most
notorious exponent, Ossama bin Laden.

However, as outlined in an excellent article by Peter Goodgame, "The
Globalists and the Islamists" (www.redmoonrising.com/Ikhwan/Clash.htm), that
the Globalists have had a hand in shaping and financing all the terrorist
organizations of the twentieth century, including the Muslim Brotherhood of
Egypt, the Hamas of Palestine, and the Afghan Mujahideen. But the history of
their duplicity dates farther back still, to the eighteenth century, when
British Freemason created the Wahhabi sect of Saudi Arabia itself, to further
their imperialistic objectives.

That a British spy by the name of Hempher was responsible for shaping of the
extreme tenets of Wahhabism was mentioned in a Turkish work, Mir'at
al-Haramain , by Ayyub Sabri Pasha between 1933-1938. British policy in its
colonies often involved the creation of deviant sects, in order to Divide and
Conquer, as was the case with the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam in India in the
nineteenth century.

The details of this conspiracy are outlined in a little known document by the
name of The Memoirs of Mr. Hempher published in series (episodes) in the
German paper Spiegel, and later on in a prominent French paper. A Lebanese
doctor translated the document to the Arabic language and from there on it was
translated to English and other languages.

The document is a first-hand account by Hempher of his mission for his
government, who sent him to the Middle East to discover ways to undermine the
Ottoman Empire. Among the vices the British were to promote were racism and
nationalism, alcohol, gambling, fornication, and tempting Muslim women to
uncover themselves.

But most important was the strategy to "insert heresies into Muslims' creedal
tenets and then criticize Islam for being a religion of terror." To this
purpose, Hempher located a particularly corrupt individual by the name of
Mohammed Ibn Adbul Wahhab.

To understand the brand of fanaticism that Wahhabism inculcated, it is first
necessary to recognize that Islam called upon all Muslims, regardless of their
race or nationality, to see themselves as brothers in faith. The killing of
another Muslim was strictly forbidden.

However, as part of their strategy of Divide and Conquer, the British hoped to
pit the Arab Muslims against their Turkish brothers. The only way to do so was
to find a loophole in Islamic law whereby the Arabs could declare the Turks as
apostates.

Abdul Wahhab was the instrument by which the British were able to insinuate
this vile idea into the Muslims of the Arabian Peninsula. Basically, Wahhab
contrived the idea that, simply by the trivial act of offering prayers to
saints, that their Turkish brethren had forfeited their faith, and therefore,
that it was permitted to kill all who refused to adhere to his reforms, and
enslave their women and children. But, that included the entire Muslim world,
expect for his small misguided band of followers.

But, the Wahabbi movement was insignificant without the allegiance of the
Saudi family, who, despite claims otherwise, were descended from a Jewish
merchant from Iraq . Orthodox jurists of the time branded the Wahhabis as
heretics, and condemned their fanaticism and intolerance. Nevertheless, the
Wahhabis then demonstrated their contempt for their pretended faith by
indiscriminately slaughtering Muslims and non-Muslims alike. The Wahhabis then
set about destroying all the holy tombs and burial grounds. They stole the
Prophet's treasure, which included holy books, works of art and innumerable
priceless gifts sent to the city during the previous thousand years. The
leather and gilt bindings of the Islamic holy books they had destroyed were
used to make sandals for the Wahhabi criminals.

The Ottoman Sultan brought an end to the first Wahhabi rebellion in 1818, but
the sect revived under the leadership of the Saudi Faysal I. The movement was
then somewhat restored until once again destroyed at the end of the nineteenth
century.

After WWI, the former regions of the Ottoman Empire were divided into varying
puppets regimes. For aiding to undermine the Ottoman authority in the region,
Ibn Saud was duly rewarded with the creation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,
in 1932. One year later, in 1933, the Saudis granted oil concessions to
California Arabian Standard Oil Company (Casoc), affiliate of Standard Oil of
California (Socal, today's Chevron), headed by Rothschild agent, and chief
among Illuminati families, Rockefeller. Since that time, Saudi Arabia has been
the most important ally to the West in the Middle East, not only providing
ready access to its plentiful oil reserves, but also in tempering Arab
aggression against Israel. Due to the evident hypocrisy of the regime, it has
been necessary to suppress the ensuing dissent with brutality. Another
important aspect has been preventing scholars from speaking of "politics",
that is, to criticize the regime.

In The Two Faces of Islam, writes Schwartz, "Their tastes led them to taverns,
casinos, brothels. . . . They bought fleets of automobiles, private jets, and
yachts the size of warships. They invested in valuable Western art they did
not understand or like and which often offended the sensitivities of Wahhabi
clerics. They spent as they wished, becoming patrons of international sexual
enslavement and the exploitation of children."

The result has been that, in order to nonetheless appear to be espousing
Islam, the Saudi regime and its puppet scholars have evolved a version of
Islam that emphasizes ceremonial details of the religion, at the expense of
helping to understand broader political realities. Their manner has encouraged
a literal interpretation of Islamic law, permitting the likes of bin Laden to
exploit the Koran to justify the killing of innocents.

Ultimately, the profusion of Rothschild financed petro-dollars in the coffers
of the Saudi family has made it possible to for them to then propagandize
their bastardized version of Islam to other parts of the world, most notably
to America, where they purportedly subsidize up to 80 percent of the mosques
in the country, a version of Islam that substitutes political awareness for
dogmatic insistence of ritualistic fanaticism.

In 1999, King Fahd of Saudi Arabia attended the Bildeberg meeting, presumably
to discuss his role in furthering the interests of world government, along
with other such luminaries as Yasser Arafat and the Pope. Evidently, the Saudi
family are part of the deceptive ploys of the Illuminati network. Their
complicity in the accumulation of petro- dollars has gone into the financing
of Global terrorism, from Afghanistan to Bosnia, merely for the purpose of
fomenting the necessary animosity of the world against Islam.

David Livingstone is author of The Dying God: The Hidden History of Western
Civilization .

5. Moussaoui  - In His Own Words [Announce]
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:27:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Editor 911review.org" <editor@911review.org>

Sometimes, nothing can be more eloquent that the words of the people most
directly involved; especially when that person is on trial for his life. In
his own words:

"This is not even a parody of Justice; it is a summary public execution."

"Until proven guilty I have a right to live. I don't want to finish like
Oswald."

"What do they have to fear? Justice; the Truth!"

There are the words of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. They
have been selected from a Transcription of Handwritten Motions he filed when
acting in his own defense.1 Although we have tried to edit them down as much
as possible, it is still lengthy, but very worthwhile reading, as it is so
rich in its explicit claims of a cover-up of what really happened on 9/11, by
the only person directly concerned who is trying to tell the truth. See

http://www.911review.org/Wiki/InHisOwnWords.shtml

6. front landing gear strut of what hit the Pentagon - not a Boeing 757
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:08:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Editor 911review.org"
<editor@911review.org> From: "Thomas R. Ascher" <lifeforce@bvcolorado.com>
Subject: Re: Rock the Pentagon Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:14:37 -0600
Message-ID: <01cb01c48e3f$8321f0e0$0200a8c0@D7WTFL31>

> John: I cleaned up an air crash when I was a kid in USAF. It was a four
> motor transport that hit the side of a mountain in Nevada. A lot survived
> especially the engines, the landing gear and the tail. The real giveaway at
> the Pentagon are the missing engines and gear. Those engines are about ten
> tons and are made of some of the toughest steel and titanium imaginable.
> Also, the landing gear are made of very high strength steel. Imagine how
> strong they have to be to support 80 plus tons of airplane hitting the
> runway at 120 knots. (They will NEVER rust.) Where are these items, that
> are nearly indestructible?

There's a photo of what appears to be the front landing gear strut of what
really did hit the Pentagon buried in the rubble.

http://www.911review.org//Wget/www.rense.com/general32/phot_files/landinggear002.jpg

The photo was originally on a military web site from Fort Belvoir in DC
(belvoir.army.mil), but I think it originally came from FEMA.

It isn't even close to a Boeing 757 strut.

Dr. Michael Elliott.

7. 911 In plane site DVD zone coding
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:55:57 +0200 From: jean-pierre.desmoulins@wanadoo.fr

> "911 In Plane Site" - NOW AVAILABLE WORLDWIDE!!!!

Usually, DVD made in USA are not readable outside the USA/Canada zone (DVD
zone 1), unless they are manufactured with the "ALL" zone identification.

8. Party of Islamic Deliverance - scapegoats in Uzbekistan
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 16:18:07 +0500 From: "Eric Walberg" <eric@albatros.uz>

This is a very enlightening intro to Hizb-ut-Tahrir. It's exactly what Uz
needs (and both K and the US are terrified of), which is why 6000 of Uz's best
are being tortured and killed. Just having a paper copy of this on you would
be enough to send you to jail! Enjoy.

Shakir Asim, Hizb-ut-Tahrir representative in Germany, answers questions
Zavtra, Valentin Prussakov, 26.08.2004 http://enews.ferghana.ru/detail.php?id=574&code_phrase=

Hizb-ut-Tahrir or Party of Islamic Deliverance stands out among numerous
Islamic movements and organizations operating throughout the world. It is
known for its activeness and "ability to publish energetic and clever
materials" to quote American publicist Adam Parfray. Established in Palestine
in 1952, the party has headquarters in London. It denounces violence and
condemns terrorism, and yet the party is outlawed in some countries including
Moslem ones. Why? Who do its activities upset? What is it after? What is its
ideology? Here is an interview with Hizb-ut-Tahrir representative in Germany
Shakir Asim.

Shakir Asim: We are a political party. Islam is our ideology. We aim to
restore the Islamic state - caliphate - on the territories of Islamic
countries and not in Europe or America as our enemies maintains.

Our activities are restricted to ideological and political spheres only. We do
not regard Islam as just a confession, one of many. We present it as a
comprehensive system of life with its own unique doctrine in the economic,
social, and political spheres. It is this system that we offer to the people
instead of the capitalist system that dominates the world nowadays. Along with
that, we voice our opinion on important political events that touch upon
Moslems. We say, for example, that the aggression against Iraq is a
colonialist war that aims to establish American dominance and rearrange the
region in the interests of Washington and Tel-Aviv. As such, it is a war on Islam.

We categorically denounce the accusations that we are hostile towards anybody
because Islam is a message to everybody. We do not make racial or skin color
distinctions. Besides, it is common knowledge that Jews and Arabs are related
by blood. But we are against Zionism and the state of Israel that occupies the
lands seized from Moslems and Christians. It symbolizes tyranny unacceptable
from the point of view of Islam regardless of what people is the tyrant. It is
the duty of every Moslem to fight all forms of tyranny, oppression, and injustice.

Our enemies say that we are inclined to being conspiratorial but we organize
public lectures. Every person who is interested - his ideology or political
outlook notwithstanding - is welcome to attend. We do not have the right to
forbid anybody to enter the lecture hall. Moreover, preventing a person from
attending a public event because of this person's views is the worst degree of
humiliation and discrimination in Islam and therefore is unacceptable...

Constant economic troubles and impoverishment of the majority of the
population of Earth are realities of our era. All of that is generated by the
global liberal system of capitalism that depletes resources of the Third
World. In this situation we suggest the system of Islam and say that it can
distribute riches fairly and that it guarantees a worthy life to every person
with all natural differences among peoples taken into account. We also
maintain hat social and family laws of Islam concur with human nature and meet
its needs. In short, we suggest Islam as an alternative to capitalism.

Promotion of Islam is our fard (obligation to God). We are prepared to die for
Islam any moment. In Uzbekistan, Islam Karimov (the West's close ally in the
"war on terrorism") imprisoned thousands and thousands of our followers and
demands that they betray their faith. All these attempts are doomed to
failure. The Koran says (14:52), "This is the message to man, and let it be
exhorted and let everyone know that He is God, the only one, and let the
reasonable come round!"

ISLAMIC MOSAICS Valentin Prussakov Zavtra, August 26, 2004, p. 5

9. 20 Israeli firms tapped Olympics' $1.5 billion security budget
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 15:20:37 -0400 From: Don <NX7933@hotmail.com>

20 Israeli firms tapped Olympics' $1.5 billion security budget

SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM Wednesday, August 25, 2004

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/front_1.html

ATHENS - Israel has played a major role in securing the Olympic Games from
insurgency attacks.

At least 20 Israeli defense and security companies have won contracts in
Greece's $1.5 billion security project for the Olympics. The companies have
offered security expertise, sensors, naval patrol vessels and a range of
software packages.

Officials said Israel has sent military and police advisers to enhance
Greece's armed forces. They said the training included the creation of sterile
zones on both land, air and sea.

Other training focused on a Greek response to an insurgency attack as well as
distinguishing between a lethal attack and a civil protest. Israel has also
helped Greece in VIP protection, Middle East Newsline reported.

The Greek security effort has been capped by a $312 million command and
control system headed by Science Applications International Corp. At least a
dozen Israeli companies, including Elbit Systems, Israel Shipyards, Motorola
Israel and Check Point Software Technologies, participate in the C2 project.

Israel Shipyards has sold three Shaldag-class patrol boats to the Greek Coast
Guard for use at the Olympics. The boats were equipped with artillery and
sensors provided by Rafael, Israel Armament Development Authority.

Software has also comprised a significant contribution by Israel to the
Olympic Games. C. Mer Industries won a $25 million contract for the sale of
software that can detect and categorize security risks. The software was
integrated into the C2 system and was said to be able to distinguish between
the sound of a flat tire exploding and a gunshot.

Israel's Controp Precision Technologies, a supplier to Israel's military, has
sold 18 Cedar-M observation cameras for the protection of sea ports. The
Cedar-M provides automatic day/night detection by scanning a panoramic view of
a targeted area.

Motorola Israel has won a $100 million contract to provide cellular units for
Olympic security. The units were provided to guards posted around Olympic
facilities.

--
Peter Myers, 21 Blair St, Watson ACT 2602, Australia ph +61 2 62475187
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers   Mirror:
http://mailstar.net/index.html
To unsubscribe, reply with "unsubscribe" in the subject line; allow 1
day.