To compare a Stammtischbruder with Charles Krauthamer is questionable for a number of reasons. Let me elaborate.

1. The Stammtischbruder does not publish his opinions in a main-stream newspaper. This makes a grand even essential difference!

2. I assume that Krauthammer nearly always knows when he is deviating from facts and events  for making his (wrong) points.. Essential difference: The Stammtischbruder starts talking according to items, and directly upon items, he knows. He may be found fault with when he talks on even after he's found out himself that there are flaws in what he says. This is a turn these talks all too often take!

3. Krauthammer has an education  based on the Talmud, i.e. he's got - at least some - training in "leading war by deception"; moreover, he has been called to do so by the teachings of the Talmud. The Stammtischbruder does not have a training, an education in all this! Krauthammer is always to a certain extent under duress for he has to hide away facts - he knows that "interest on money" is the main cause for ongoing troubles for a long time - for generations, even for centuries!

 

4. The lukewarm people who do not speak their minds - and by this test and improve what they know - when they see horrible things rampant, they are to blame for it!....

The Money Question

1. To what extent is someone to blame who is not prepared / trained to coming across people trained - to some extent- in "leading war by deception?

2. To what extent are people to blame that do not notice that very many of the ongoing troubles are brought about by an economy based on "interest on money", that starts an absolutely iniquitous race between the money-lenders, usurers - with time linked interest, and the ones offering services, or producing something? To be better positioned in this race I saw one or two weeks ago in the FAZ an article that Siemens was planning to dissolve 55 000 Arbeitsplätze - jobs at pretty short notice!

 

3. The notion of Human Rights of a banker being free to wield his tool of "interest on money" is this: Do what you will, after a while, and after enough enterprises will have been  started on credit - and have been going on for a while  -, all of this will be the banks' sole property! And then they can strangle you in any way they want, having you - factually - as serfs, slaves, or starving you. - as was done in the French Revolution, in the Bolshevik Revolution, especially Ukraine, and is happening presently almost world-wide etc.

4. If someone comes with a new idea bankers can support him as long as they think it as some use to them, but also can drop him at very short notice because it costs but a few entries in the bank account books.

5. In a society / community with "interest on money" we are all inextricably involved, subjected, to an ever extending system, that even for its own subsistence needs to be continuously extended. For this economic bubbles and ever new trends are created, and wars are contrived etc.

6. This alone makes people aggressive. Beyond this, most people are bound to lose in this race, and are aware of this over a long time! This  makes them absolutely aggressive, which also alternates with self-reproaches because normally they also think the cause for this is their being a failure. So, if you know the parable / fable by Bertolt Brecht If Sharks were Humans, the sharks described there are peaceful Beetschwestern - sisters of prayer- if compared with humans on the prongs of "interest on money"!

 

7. The "clash of civilizations" is over for these bankers when the Arab world will have adopted the "democratic way of banking" with "interest on money". Once Arabs do this it's only a matter of some time until these banks will be under control of the "democratic financial system". Compare the sizes of "Arab banking" and "democratic banking", and remember Bertolt Brechts parable /fable!

8. If Dr Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's Iran opens their oil bourse along the legal lines of "democratic banking", or the oil bourses in London and New York, it's but a matter of some time that all of Iran will be subjected to this financial system run mainly from New York and London! In such a case the oil bourse will serve as a Trojan Horse to subject Iran to "western democratic standards"!

9. The basic cause - that wasn't said, of course, - for WWII was that Hitler had taken Germany out of this global financial system, and was about to prove world-wide that the system based predominantly on barter he had created well-served the people. This can be very clearly be seen in the negotiations at the time of the war which is known under these names: "Phoney War", the "Telefonkrieg", or "Telegammkrieg"

 

10. The accusations against Germany of "warmongering", and above all the Holocaust allegations also serve to keep this hidden!