Dear Fellow Patriot!


Well, the weekend is almost over. That means back to
the "Alte Tretmuehle."

I still receive incredible mail about The Passion Of
The Christ. The blacks have chimed in, the Jews have
lamented, the Israeli Christians have complained, etc,
etc. At the same time, the film is just raking in the
money. So, I would really appreciate if  you stop
sending me mail about how Mel Gibson became again a
millionaire. Thank you.

*******************************************************

Dr. Leon Bourke has forwarded me this article, that I
think if worth your time:

[START]

A STRAIGHT LOOK AT THE THIRD REICH

Hitler and National Socialism, How Right? How Wrong?

by Austin J. App, Ph.D.

Decades after Unconditional Surrender, an objective
look at the Third Reich and National Socialism is long
overdue.[1] Three recent trips to Germany have
convinced me that any German policy which is patriotic
and national -- as truly German as we want American
policy to be truly American -- one which is firmly
anti-communistic and yet not slavishly subservient to
the Western victors, will be denounced as neo-Nazi.
Yet unless Germany can soon generate such a policy
into office, it seems destined to fall under the
domination of Soviet Russia.

GREEN LIGHT FOR SOVIETS TO INVADE

Indeed, the United Nations Charter (in Articles 53 and
107) reserves to Soviet Russia the right to invade
West Berlin and West Germany whenever it can allege a
revival there of neo-Nazism OR militarism. Every time
anyone accuses anything in West Germany or in Austria
as NEO-NAZI he is flashing a green light to Soviet
Russia to invade these FORMER ENEMIES. When in 1968
West Germany faintly protested the Red invasion of
Czechoslovakia, Moscow pointed to Articles 53 and 107
and convulsed Bonn with terror and silence. And
blackmailed it into ratifying the Red theft of the
Oder-Neisse territories -- one fourth of Germany --
and to sanction the expulsion of its fifteen million
inhabitants (which includes the Sudeten Germans) and
the murder of 2,500,000! And in the Moscow-Bonn
treaty, West Germany had to endorse Articles 53 and
107!

Yet a nation whom the victors do not allow to be
nationalistic cannot long remain a nation; it will go
the way the Soviet Zone of Germany and Czechoslovakia
have gone -- right under the noses of the
Anglo-American champions of democracy! The world-wide
Communistic conspiracy and a lingering Morgenthauism
have succeeded in labeling all German patriotism as
NEO-NAZI and to keep representing the Third Reich as
monstrously evil, and National Socialism as the most
Satanic governmental philosophy and system in the
world!

IT IS HIGH TIME TO TAKE AN HONEST LOOK

The time is overdue to investigate what validity this
judgement has and who is behind it. According to some
signs, what is not totally evil is National Socialism,
and what IS totally evil is the propaganda of the
Unconditional Surrenderists! For example, I was jolted
when the very respectable German paper, DEUTSCHE
ZEITUNG: CHRIST UND WELT, "War Hitler ein grosser
Man?" (April 18, 1969) dutifully denies that Hitler
was great, complains that he ruined Germany, but dares
to cite as one small, positive accomplishment of his
that he "broke up class structure of bourgeois Germany
and created a condition of social equality." In other
words, National Socialism, it appears, was an
instrument for social democracy, and this is really
the most Christian element of democracy! This would
represent a huge hunk of good in National Socialism!

GENERAL WEDEMEYER ALSO FOUND GOOD ASPECTS

While absorbing this revelation in the anti-Nazi
DEUTSCHE ZEITUNG, I happened to re-read WEDEMEYER
REPORTS (Devin-Adair Co., 1 Park Ave, Old Greenwich,
Conn. 06870, 497 pages, hardback, $7.50; paperback,
$2.95). In it, General Albert C. Wedemeyer, a
Nebraskan American, whom the U.S. Army sent to study
in the German KRIEGAKADEMIE from 1936 to 1938, who
therefore is one of the few Americans who saw Nazi
Germany when it was in peaceful operation, before it
was distorted by war, made the following observation:

"There were some aspects of the Third Reich which
seemed good at the time -- for example, the public
works program; encouragement of the arts, music, and
sciences; the building of roads and communications;
and cultural opportunities such as travel abroad for
underprivileged people at government expense." (p. 38)


In other words, German National Socialism, the Third
Reich, which Talmudists, Communists and our media
continue to represent as the very epitome of
concentrated evil had in reality some good in it! I
cannot help adding here that it also suppressed the
greatest contemporary American, Swedish, Danish and
West German shame -- and that of the Weimar Republic
-- pornography! Nor did it tolerate the effects of
pornography -- prostitution, perversion, sodomy! It
frowned upon divorce, encouraged marital fidelity. And
whatever else Hitler might have been, he was not an
adulterer like Roosevelt, who two-timed his wife, with
two of his secretaries! Nor like Wilson, whose
adultery caused the Jews to blackmail him into
appointing Brandeis to the Supreme Court and to
railroad the U.S. into World War I!

THE THIRD REICH NEEDED NO BARBED WIRE TO KEEP ITS OWN
PEOPLE IN

Indeed, upon a moment's reflection, we realize with a
start that Nazi Germany before the war certainly had
nothing like the Berlin Wall to keep its citizens in,
nor a barbed wire entanglement -- no Iron Curtain --
around its frontier, through the middle of Europe, all
hideous barbarisms which characterize our lend-lease
Pals, the Communists! We also recollect that until
1939 people could come and go to and from Germany very
much as in the U.S. and Great Britain! But NEVER to
and from Soviet Russia, or its satellites, like the
Soviet Zone of Germany, hypocritically called the
DEMOCRATIC GERMAN REPUBLIC.

Most of all, Jews could leave Germany at will -- with
their belongings -- and without paying a head tax! In
contrast, Soviet Russia, which the media continue to
represent as a kind of Utopia compared to Nazi
Germany, does not let Jews -- nor any other ethnic
groups, not even the remaining Oder-Neisse Germans --
go and come as they please. And they charge huge head
taxes for the Jews they do let out! In reality, Hitler
permitted them, even encouraged them, to emigrate,
precisely what Jews bitterly complain that Soviet
Russia denies them!

Yet, these same Jews continue to call National
Socialism intrinsically evil, but Communism, but for a
few AD HOC inconveniences, relatively good! In short,
the Third Reich was a relatively open and exposed
society, like our own, while Soviet Russia and its
satellites are barbed-wired in like huge concentration
camps!

WILL HITLER LIKE GOLDWATER BE REHABILITATED?

Ever since our media have ganged up to represent
President Nixon as liar, thief, and dictator, a
veritable Hitler, they also begin to talk of Senator
Barry Goldwater as the American ideal of a senator.
Recently Walter Cronkite pontificated benignly over
Goldwater:

"If Goldwater now sounds like the voice of moderation
and reason, in this current of public confidence
perhaps it's because ... he seems to plead no special
cause, right now, except frankness and honesty ...
Once ... He was ridiculed as an anachronism ... are
the times catching up to Barry Goldwater?" (NATIONAL
REVIEW, November 9, 1973)

Goldwater was not only called an "anachronism", he was
denounced as a Hitler, a Fascist, and a racist. If
"the times are catching up to Barry Goldwater", and
rehabilitating him, perhaps the times will by and by
catch up with Adolf Hitler, too? That is why I am
writing this booklet!

Here is what a few of the great U.S. publicists, who
in 1964 still denounced Hitler as an abomination, said
of Goldwater. Martin Luther King croaked, "We see
dangerous signs of Hitlerism in the Goldwater
campaign." If he wins, there will be an "outbreak of
violence" by Negroes. George Meany, who is especially
down on Nixon now, announced "a parallel between
Senator Barry Goldwater and Adolf Hitler." Jackie
Robinson said he believes he now knows "how it felt to
be a Jew in Hitler's Germany." Drew Pearson, one who
didn't believe in the Devil but knew Hitler was the
Devil, perceived "The smell of Fascism ... in the air"
at the San Francisco Convention. Governor Pat Brown
found that "Goldwater's acceptance speech had the
stench of Fascism ... All we needed to hear was "Heil
Hitler"!

And of course C. L. Sulzberger, of the NEW YORK TIMES,
which to ruin Nixon made a monster out of the
Watergate peccadillo, found that:

"... in January 1963 a dangerous group of financial
supporters including racists and labor-baiters began
to push Goldwater's candidacy ... the kind of business
backing behind the Nazis in the early Thirties."

James Reston, another pundit of the NEW YORK TIMES,
reminded Goldwater "that most of the extremist tyrants
of history, from Caesar and Napoleon to Hitler and
Stalin, acted in the name of liberty and justice." (We
are indebted for these quotations to NATIONAL REVIEW,
November 9, 1973.)

IF HITLER WAS LIKE GOLDWATER, HE MUST HAVE BEEN PRETTY
GOOD!

We see that in 1964 the top American opinion-makers
equated Goldwater with Hitler, and the Republicans
with Nazis and Fascists! And within a few months they
so defamed Goldwater that he sank from a Republican
hero to a "monster" few dared to name and fewer to
vote for! Now, if the moral cripples in our media can
do this to a now revered American politician, can
anyone doubt that they could and would do worse to a
foreign politician with whose country they tricked us
into a war? If they could make Goldwater look like
Hitler, and the Republican Party like Nazis and
Fascists, then one cannot accept their defamations of
Hitler nor of National Socialism. OUR TOP OPINION
MAKERS DURING AND AFTER WORLD WAR II, AND OUR TOP
MEDIA, OUTSIDE THE "CHICAGO TRIBUNE", WERE LIARS,
MORAL CRIPPLES, AND PROSTITUTES OF ROOSEVELT AND
MORGENTHAU -- AND LARGELY STILL ARE!

What they have been saying about Hitler and National
Socialism, like what they said about the Kaiser in
1919 and Barry Goldwater in 1964, is the crudest, the
dirtiest, the vilest character-assassination! Only
moral cripples would stoop to it, and only a
brain-washed public would believe it.

THE U.S. MEDIA AND THE PUBLIC HAVE TRADITIONALLY BEEN
UNFAIR TO OPPONENTS

The top U.S. media, possibly because they are
dominated by Jews, as their smearing of Goldwater in
1964 and of President Nixon now, and of President
Herbert Hoover in 1928, shows, have no tradition of
fairness to anyone they hate. They are
smear-terroristic liars and slanderers. But, sad to
say, they have also in wartime subverted much of the
public to a frenzy of prejudice. Even in our Civil
War, where Americans fought against Americans,
Americans of the North were told and came to believe
that Choctaw County stunk with dead bodies of murdered
slaves, and that Southern belles (really sisters of
the belles of the North) had worn necklaces strung of
Yankee eyeballs! And Northern politicians, like
Thaddeus Stevens, said of the Southerners, fellow
Americans, "Humble the proud traitors, strip them of
their bloated estates ... desolate the section ...
reduce them to hopeless feebleness."

If Yankees could believe that Southern girls wore
necklaces of Yankee eyeballs, would they not even more
readily believe that Germans made lamp-shades out of
the skin of prisoners, or that they boiled Jews into
soap? If in 1918 they wanted to hang the Kaiser on a
sour apple tree, as the monster criminal of World War
I, a world leader now universally recognized as one of
the most decent and moderate of all War leaders,
certainly less dishonest and less vindictive than
Wilson, Lloyd George, Clemenceau, and General Foche,
is it not likely that for possibly no more
justification they would want to hang Hitler, and did
in fact at the Nuremberg Trials hang Germans no more
guilty than the Kaiser, or Hindenburg, or Ludendorf?
Clearly what judgement American pundits and the media
and as a consequence, much of the public screeched
about the German leaders and people after World War II
deserves not to be credited -- and needs to be studied
honestly and be revised. This -- and only this -- I am
trying to do in this booklet.

WOULD HITLER LIKELY ESCAPE THE GERMANOPHOBIA OF WORLD
WAR I?

Have you ever heard that Hitler "burned books" and
that therefore the Third Reich must be destroyed, its
cities bombed, its workmen's homes destroyed by fire
bombs, its churches bombed to bits, and a maximum of
women and children massacred, as in Dresden? Well, in
World War I, after Wilson appointed George Creel as
director of public information, really as the
government prostitute for publicizing false atrocity
stories against the Central Powers, such as that
Germans went around slicing the arms off Belgian
babies, the allegedly fair-minded American public
outlawed the German language from the schools:

"German music and literature, German church services,
the German language, the activities of all German
societies ... came under the ban of super-patriots ...
The "Hun" language was banished from the curriculum
... German books were thrown out of libraries, sold as
trash or burned in the public square with patriotic
ceremonies." (Whittke, GERMAN PRESS, pp. 268-9)

Is it likely that a public that could be propagandized
into such a frenzy of hatred of an enemy long since
recognized as marvelously chivalrous, would not be
whipped to a worse paroxysm of hatred and vilification
during and after World War II, when in addition to the
George Creel type of slanderers the Third Reich and
the German people have been exposed to the likes of
the Jewish Communist Ilya Ehrenburg, who ordered all
German women raped, and Jews like Theodore N. Kaufman
(GERMANY MUST PERISH), who wanted all German men
castrated, and Secretary of the Treasury, Henry J.
Morgenthau (GERMANY IS OUR PROBLEM), who wanted all
Germans starved to death?

HATE PEDDLERS MUCH WORSE IN WORLD WAR II THAN IN WORLD
WAR I

Is it really likely that when such genocidal
barbarians swayed Allied propaganda and policy, that
Hitler and the Third Reich and the German people could
have been given an honest and fair treatment?
Obviously when such monsters of slander and
vilification and genocide were the darlings of our
media fairness to the Third Reich -- to Hitler, to
National Socialism -- has had no more chance than the
proverbial snowball in hell! I am writing this booklet
only to try to start setting the record straight -- no
more. I don't want to defend the Third Reich, nor
National Socialism, I just want truth and justice for
them. Though it be Utopian to hope so -- in as much as
even after 2,000 years it still does not grant truth
and justice to Jesus of Nazareth, -- I am most eager
to have the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai Brith
accept my modest and sincere intention!

CRUSADERS FOR "DEMOCRACY" PERMIT EVERY TYPE OF
GOVERNMENT EXCEPT NATIONAL SOCIALISM

The one thing the self-acclaimed "Crusaders" for the
destruction of Germany proclaimed over and over again
was and is that every people has the right to choose
what form of government it wants but that no outside
power or unpopular armed clique may force its type of
rule on a people. In the third Article of the Atlantic
Charter, the top hypocrites of the world, Roosevelt
and Churchill, preached "the right of all peoples to
choose the form of government under which they will
live"!

But what did they do? As soon as they had forced
Unconditional Surrender on the hapless German and
Austrian people, the peace dictators violently,
without a plebiscite, tore Austrians from Germany and
told them they must adopt the Rooseveltian New Deal as
their form of government or be starved to death. And
again the Western victors, without consulting the
German people, told the West Germans under their
occupation, that if they do not wish to be
exterminated as Nazis or Nazi sympathizers, they must
adopt the Rooseveltian New Deal and nothing else.

IF ANGLO-AMERICANS COULD FORCE THEIR GOVERNMENT ON
GERMANY, COULD NOT MOSCOW IMPOSE ITS FORM OF
GOVERNMENT?

Is it possible that the Anglo-American peace dictators
did not realize that if they claimed the right and
duty to force their form of government on the German
and Austrian people, under their occupation, Soviet
Russia would feel justified to force Communism on its
zones of occupation? Could our diplomats have really
been so stupid and blind! Or did they secretly,
barbarized and bolshevized by Morgenthauism, want to
deliver the German people to the Reds? Morgenthau
wanted U.S. troops to leave Europe and let Europeans
occupy all of Germany, which in effect meant handing
it over to the Soviet Russian rapists and burglars.
Morgenthau was flanked by Communist Harry Dexter
White, and he by Alger Hiss. John Barron (in KGB, N.Y.
1974, p. 188) lists among his catalogue of Red spies
in our foreign service, such characters as Ullmann,
Reno, Coplin, Gold, Greenglass, Julius and Ethel
Rosenberg (whom the media now glamorize), Sobell,
Perl, Soble, Wolston, and Alfred and Martha Stern. And
such as Klaus Fuchs and Philby for Britain.

No wonder that with characters like that the
Anglo-Americans forced the New Deal on West Germany in
a way which invited Soviet Russia to force Communism
on the eastern half of Germany -- and on Poland, the
Baltic States, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Rumania,
Bulgaria, and Yugoslavia! That is the right "of all
peoples to choose the form of government under which
they want to live" which the "holy Rooseveltian
Crusaders" inflicted on Europe -- and on China, North
Korea, and North Vietnam!

SINCE THE VICTORS SO FAVORED THE TOTALITARIANISM OF
COMMUNISM, BY WHAT LOGIC DID AND DO THEY PROHIBIT
NATIONAL SOCIALISM FOR THE GERMAN PEOPLE?

If "liberated", and all other nations can choose the
form of government they want, just why can't the
Germans choose National Socialism, in preference to
the atheistic, barbarous, abominable totalitarianism
of Bolshevism the victors not only permitted to them
but forced upon them? And upon a dozen unfortunate
Baltic and Asiatic peoples?

Let me again explain for the benefit of the
Morgenthauistic smear-terrorists, I do not recommend
National Socialism or Fascism, I do not advocate it
for Germany or for Italy. What I do declare solemnly
is that since the Potsdam Pact any impulses of
patriotism in West Germany, of honorable nationalism,
no matter how timid, are immediately denounced and
destroyed by the American, British, Israeli and Soviet
press as "neo-Nazi". And in a fright, the bulk of the
German press, which the Rooseveltians after the war
handed over to exclusively liberal, socialistic,
pro-Communistic, virtually treasonable so-called
Germans, immediately claques in unison with the
Germanophobic international press and chokes off any
German patriotic movement. This is what, for example,
it did to the NPD (National Democratic Party). This
was an absolutely harmless but patriotic and national
German party, and its chairman, Adolf von Thadden
(whose sister had been executed by the Nazis) was
about as anti-National Socialistic as it is possible
to be. But he and the party were patriotically German,
they wanted a Germany with some national pride, and
most of all they wanted to get rid of the Communistic
savages in the eastern part of Germany, one half of
the total, and reunification in the boundaries
Wilson's Fourteen Points and the Rooseveltian Atlantic
Charter had guaranteed to the vanquished!

GERMAN PATRIOTISM SQUASHED, CALUMNIATED AS
"NEO-NAZISM"

For this the same type of moral cripples who in 1964
equated Goldwater with Hitler screeched day and night
about the revival of National Socialism in Germany and
howled to have it crushed, even if necessary by having
Soviet Russia invoke Articles 53 and 107 and march
into West Germany!

It is because of these very articles that I insist it
is necessary to put National Socialism in proper
perspective. I solemnly declare that since the Potsdam
Pact the victors have not allowed Germany to be
patriotic. They have not allowed it to have national
pride. They have not allowed it to have a modern army
with modern weapons -- and an army without modern
weapons is a swindle. It is an invitation to the
Soviet Russians to march in.

Any but a Morgenthauist ought to realize that a
Germany that is denounced as "neo-Nazi" at every
breath of patriotism has no alternative, and only one
choice -- to go Communist, to seek its reunification
from Soviet Russia, rather than from a United Western
Front. At the first sign of a real depression, and as
in people's hearts the desire of a reunified Germany
grows, (but which they may not express), the German
people can only turn to Communism. The West which
encouraged the Berlin Wall and accepted the Iron
Curtain without a protest, and which calls all real
patriotism "neo-Nazi", which staffed its chief papers
with virtual traitors, cannot seem to honest Germans
as an alternative! Hope remains only if it quickly
stops denouncing patriotism as National Socialism and
Fascism!

I saw the German dilemma once. In 1931, Germany
suffered from the worst depression I ever experienced
or read about. The Communists, mostly with Jewish
leaders (e.g. Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Liebknecht, Kurt
Eisner), were aggressively and ruthlessly advancing
their Red barbarism. The only opposition to them was
Hitler and his followers. It was clear to me, then a
young man, that the German people, to whom America and
the West had refused self-determination for Austria,
the Sudetenland, Danzig and the Corridor, South Tyrol,
had only one alternative, Communism OR National
Socialism.

May I here add that it was at that time impossible to
oppose the Red barbarism energetically without being
denounced by Communists and Jews as "anti-Semitic". I
may add, THAT is still is the case. It happened to
Lindbergh, to Father Coughlin, and to Senator Joseph
McCarthy!

THANKS TO HITLER, PART OF EUROPE IS STILL FREE

It may take another hundred years, or a Third World
War with the Communistic monster which the
Rooseveltians created, before it will be realized that
it was Hitler and his National Socialism to whom, from
Spain to England, Western Europe must be grateful for
having preserved them at least until now from the Red
barbarism. Because the Rooseveltians knocked the sword
out of Germany's hand at Stalingrad, half of Germany,
all of Poland, the Balkans, the Baltic Republics have
since 1945 suffered the frightful agony and tyranny
and totalitarianism of the Bolshevik savages to which
the Anglo-Americans at the Potsdam Pact betrayed them!
That it was Hitler who saved Spain, the western anchor
of freedom, from the Bolshevik take-over is already
admitted.

AGAIN THE GERMAN PEOPLE MUST BUT MAY NOT CHOOSE
PATRIOTISM AND FREEDOM

Luckily, as by and by even our journalistic moral
cripples will admit, Hitler and his National
Socialists and Mussolini and his Fascists in those so
critical years for Europe won. But what makes me
tremble is the fact that again the German people,
normally, has only the choice of throwing off the
unpatriotic phony democracy of the Rooseveltians
forced upon it in 1945 or to let Soviet Russia engulf
it. The present German government, that of Brandt,
Wehner, and Bahr, all former Communists and, according
to all appearances still more Communistic than German,
in the last two years have sanctioned and ratified the
Communist robbery of the Oder-Neisse territories,
one-fourth of Germany proper, have betrayed the
Sudeten Germans to the Red Czechs, have endangered
West Berlin, are paying huge indemnities to the
Communists countries to reward them for the most
atrocious mass crime in all recorded history, the
expulsion, and total robbery, and clubbing to death of
20% of the East Prussians, Pommeranians, Silesians and
Sudeten Germans. A government that does that is not
for Germany, it is for Soviet Russia!

And the Brandt-Wehner-Bahr collection of former
Communists could afford these frightful betrayals of
German rights because they knew that Washington, with
a co-racialist as Bahr as Secretary of State, Henry
Kissinger, and President Nixon bludgeoned into serving
Zionist and Morgenthau interests rather than American
and Western ones, would be happy if West Germany
served "detente" by betraying all of Eastern Germany
and all the satellite and enslaved nations!

GERMANY BEING BETRAYED HELPLESSLY TO SOVIET-RUSSIA

The government imposed upon Germany by the
Rooseveltians, never truly independent of U.S.
Morgenthauism, is, with the additional impulse of the
prevailing phony "detente", betraying Germans to
Soviet Russia. Had the NPD not been smear-terrorized
out of influence some years ago, this would not be
happening.

But the frightful condition is that, whereas in 1931
Germany was allowed to chose an alternative to
Bolshevism, in 1974 it is damned as "neo-Nazi" if it
chooses patriotism and nationalism -- and therefore
has no alternative. Its only hope for reunification is
surrendering to Soviet Russia!

And let me make it absolutely clear, any patriotic
impulse in Germany, any effort for an adequate
defence, any sense of national pride is immediately
damned by the Bolshevik, Israeli, and American media
as "neo-Nazi" deserving of another Nuremberg trial!


To try to expose this suicidal Germanophobic hate
propaganda I am writing this booklet. I AM NOT WRITING
IT TO GLORIFY NATIONAL SOCIALISM, MUCH LESS
"NEO-NAZISM", I AM WRITING IT TO PREVENT GERMAN
PATRIOTISM FROM BEING SMEAR-TERRORIZED AS "NEO-NAZI".

JUST WHAT IS WRONG WITH NATIONAL SOCIALISM THAT IS NOT
TEN TIMES WORSE IN BOLSHEVISM?

But to achieve this so critically important fairness
in the West, I seem to be able only to do it by asking
just what is so wrong in National Socialism that is
not ten times more wrong in Bolshevism? Just why at
Potsdam did the Western victors tell the Germans on
pain of destruction not ever to tolerate or embrace
National Socialism, but to be very open-minded about
Communism, and in fact ordered the defenseless Germans
to accept it as their system of government for the
eastern half of Germany!

Why this insane foaming-at-the-mouth hatred of
National Socialism? Harry Elmer Barnes, before World
War II the great darling of Jews and Liberals, wrote:

"In short, there is no unique or special case against
Nazi barbarism and horrors unless one assumes that it
is far more wicked to exterminate Jews than to
massacre Gentiles." (BLASTING THE HISTORICAL BLACKOUT,
May, 1963, p. 35).

Morgenthau, whose plan envisaged the starving to death
of the German race, when the Nuremberg Trials were
proposed against Germans, "... would have preferred
simply to shoot the arch criminals"; furthermore he
wanted "... all members of an organization like the SS
(to) be found guilty of a crime against humanity
collectively, and punished without further trial"
(John Morton Blum, MORGENTHAU DIARIES, years 1941-45,
p. 397). This genocidist, who arrogated to himself the
moral superiority to shoot Nazis on sight, said to his
Communist assistant, Harry Dexter White:

"The only thing you can sell me, or I will have any
part of, is the complete shut-down of the Ruhr ...
Just strip it, I don't care what happens to the
population ... I would take every mine, every mill,
and factory and wreck it ... Steel, coal, everything.
Just close it down ... I am for destroying it first
and we will worry about the population second (p.354).


NO NAZI EVER AS GENOCIDIC AS MORGENTHAU

This is one of the Allied monsters who wanted to kill
all National Socialists and all "neo-Nazis"! Had any
German, any National Socialist, ever spoken anything
as inhumane as Morgenthau spoke on the Ruhr, the
Allied hypocrites would have hanged him forthwith. I
maintain that no National Socialist, no German before,
during, or after World War II ever wanted anything so
genocidic, or savage as Morgenthau! Yet, the holy
crusaders, who, forbade National Socialism forever and
ever, did not move a finger to try and hang
Morgenthau! What right had the likes of him to condemn
the National Socialists? He was not civilized enough
to have the right to kill a jackal in the act of
killing a lamb! And that pretty well goes for most of
the frenzied slanderers of National Socialism! Harry
Elmer Barnes wrote:

"Extremely severe sentences were imposed on Germans
convicted at Nuremberg of "plotting" evil deeds, and
it is doubtful if anything more evil than the
Morgenthau Plan was ever plotted. (BLASTING THE
HISTORICAL BLACKOUT, p. 33)

There wasn't! The Morgenthau Plan, which Roosevelt
made official American policy, and which was in effect
until 1947, was positively the most genocidic peace
plan in all recorded history. And genocidists of this
stamp presume to condemn German National Socialism
from the face of the earth!

Father Daniel Lyons, S.J., writing in TWIN CIRCLE
(October 12, 1969), commenting on how the press
favorably discussed Ho Chi Minh, "the Joseph Stalin of
Vietnam", added that Roosevelt, too, often praised
Stalin, and adds, "Stalin killed more people than
Hitler by far, but it was not until Khruschev
denounced Stalin that the U.S. press stopped praising
him."

STALIN AT WORST MERELY PUT MORGENTHAU TO WORK

The genocide that Morgenthau plotted on paper (and
which we Christians of America managed to keep from
full implementation), Stalin put into action. He
deliberately starved six million Ukrainians to death,
he murdered 2691 priests and 5409 monks, he tore down
or converted 15,000 Russian churches to stables at
worst and museums at best.[2] He murdered 15,000
Polish officers, P.0.W.'s at Katyn and elsewhere, he
slave-labored perhaps two million German P.O.W.'s to
death (of 96,000 captured at Stalingrad only 6,000
returned alive!), he looted and plundered for decades
the half of Germany under his administration, and he
put under Soviet tyranny half of Germany and seven
satellites, his soldiers raped a million German,
Austrian, and Hungarian women, and he organized the
most bestial mass atrocity in all recorded history,
the expulsion of 15,000,000 Oder-Neisse and Sudeten
and Balkan Germans, the total robbery of all of their
possessions, and clubbing and raping to death of some
20% of them.

To equate such a monster of satanic evil with Hitler
is almost as blasphemous as equating Jesus of Nazareth
with Genghis Khan! Or his communism with Hitler's
National Socialism!

[END]

*******************************************************

There is great news in the Zundel case. Please check:

http://www.zundelsite.org

Check out what Dr. Toben expresses:

[START]

Belief and Denialism

Fredrick Töben says:

I do not DENY the 'Holocaust'

I refuse to BELIEVE in the 'Holocaust'

[END]

He also forwarded this article:

[START]

Toronto Globe and Mail editorial

Zündel doesn't warrant a security certificate

Saturday, March 6, 2004 - Page A22

Ernst Zündel has been in a Canadian jail for more than
a year. Seized at his Tennessee home by U.S.
immigration agents and delivered here, he is facing
deportation to Germany on claims that he is a danger
to Canadian citizens. In the meantime, he languishes
in a tiny cell at Toronto's Metro West Detention
Centre in solitary confinement.

Tough luck, many will say. Mr. Zündel is depressingly
well known to Canadians as a Holocaust-denier and
extreme right-winger who spent decades here spreading
his noxious opinions about Jews. We would all love to
see the back of him. But is he dangerous? So
dangerous, in fact, that we need to pen him up in an
isolation cell for 12 months and counting?

The federal government is holding Mr. Zündel on a
national security certificate, a special procedure
that allows it to bypass many of the standard rules of
due process to protect public safety. Those cases
almost always involve suspected terrorists. If two
cabinet ministers decide that an individual poses a
risk, they can have him locked up indefinitely
pending deportation. The suspect is not allowed to see
the precise evidence against him, and his odds of
overturning the order in court are slim. The
government must show only that it acted "reasonably,"
a preposterously low legal hurdle.

These are extreme measures in a democratic society,
and Ottawa should use them only if it believes a
suspect is likely to do physical harm to people
or property. Odious as he is, Mr. Zündel poses no such
risk. He has never been charged with a violent crime
and does not urge others to commit violence. He is a
crank, not a terrorist.

It is hard to know exactly how Ottawa defends its
decision to jail Mr. Zündel, because, under the
security-certificate process, it can keep most of its
evidence secret -- a provision that severely limits
Mr. Zündel's right to mount a defence. But a summary
compiled by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service
argues that even if he doesn't actually advocate
violence, he is dangerous because of the influence he
exerts on his followers. "By his comportment as a
leader and an ideologue, the service believes Zündel
intends serious violence to be a consequence of his
influence."

That, says Mr. Zündel, is guilt by association. He is
right. It is precisely the sort of argument that was
used to lock up leftists in the days of the Red Scare.
You are a Communist and Communists advocate violent
revolution; therefore you are conspiring to commit
violence against the state. Guilty as charged.

If Mr. Zündel can be jailed and deported for his
"comportment" as an "ideologue," then every
Greenpeacer and anti-abortion activist must fear
imprisonment. Their rhetoric is pretty wild, too.
Perhaps the anti-poverty campaigner with a nose-ring
handing out pamphlets at the mall also "intends
serious violence to be a consequence of his
influence." Now that CSIS has the power to read minds,
who knows where it may stop?

The real danger to Canadians comes not from obnoxious
nuts like Ernst Zündel, but from a government that
casually discards their most precious rights.

[END]

*******************************************************

Also a few words about other e-mails forwarded to me.
Please do not forward me the Z-Gram. I am on Mrs.
Zundel's e-mail list.

Anything from Rense.com or ReportersNoteBook I won't
even look at. They are both plagiarists. Rense.com
just recently took the Dresden ccard from the Young
Saxons, cut it in half, blew it up and posted it on
the front page of his website. The caption:

"Glory, glory, halleluja!"

Anyone familiar with the card knows that the side
blown up by rense.com was the one the shows Germans
fleeing firing airplanes and the fire. Rense.com had
no permission to distort the card like this. I have
good contact with the Young Saxons and every year I
buy a few hundred of these cards. They are copyrighted
and they are the only means for this young group to
raise funds. After sending a harsh letter to rense's
webmaster, it was finally taken down. I despise these
"for profit" website that ruthlessly plagiarize
anything to make it look like they have their finger
on the beat. The Young Saxons need every dime they can
get to produce this once a year memorial. In fact,
more than 3,000 people showed up this year. If you do
use the Dresden memorial card, then give them credit,
or at least mention their website:

http://www.jlosachsen.de

So, again, please don't crowd my inbox with stuff from
rense or reportersnotebook. Thank you.

*******************************************************

See you at the 2004 International Revisionist
Conference in Sacramento, held on April 24th and 25th,
hosted by the European American Culture Council,
sponsored by the Adelaide Institute!

Organizer: Walter F. Mueller

thetruthisback@yahoo.com

Make your reservations today by contacting

hansgemuetlich@yahoo.com


Walter F. Mueller
"The truth is back in business"

The "Patriot Letter" is a free news service of
Community News, a monthly publication with a
circulation of 20,000. To subscribe to Community News
please e-mail for more information.

To be removed from this e-mail list, reply with
"unsubscribe".