Dear Free Speech Supporter:

Big thanks to Wolfgang Mueller for the following report on the February 19
Zundel hearing before Mr. Justice Pierre Blais. Most of the loyal band of
supporters attended Gerhard Hass's funeral that morning and, therefore,
missed the hearing. Our close associate Wolfgang Mueller held the fort and
took notes.

Still, a half dozen supporters arrived from the funeral for the afternoon
session.

Paul Fromm
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION
__________
R  e  p  o  r  t  on HEARING in Federal Court

about: Reasonableness of Security  Certificate issued against  Ernst Zuendel
in: Toronto, Ontario, on February 19, 2004; From about. 9:15 a.m. to about.
14:30.
Presiding: Judge Blais;
Representing the Fed. Gov't: Crown Attorney MacIntosh  plus three  others
Representing Ernst Zundel: Peter Lindsay and his partner
Purpose of Session: Questioning of Mr. Zuendel by Mr. Lindsay
In the audience: about a dozen civilians
Other: 4 security personnel, and additional Court admin. Personnel.
Suspect: Ernst Zundel appearing without cuffs, in civilian clothes but
beltless pants, held up by a tie.

In continuation of yesterday's session  Mr. Lindsay recalled a number of
items,  illustrating how Mr. Z. had been continuously harassed by a number
of mainly Jewish organisations such as B'nai Brith and persons for
political reason and the results thereof:
How one such charge against Mr. Z. had not been properly documented in one
of his previous trials and was therefore dismissed; how it was claimed that
his periodic "Power" letter was allegedly  disseminating hate;  how the CBC
had made a broadcast under the  title  " HI-Tech Hate" dealing among other
things  with his radio transmissions, his activities in Germany; and how
another charge of distributing hateful material laid by Sabina Citron  was
dropped by the government due to insufficient evidence.
How Ms. Citron initiated thereupon a $10 Million lawsuit against Mr. Z. to
which he responded with a lawsuit of his own; these suits resulting in a
"Mexican standoff" and remain in limbo to this day.
Mr. Lindsay claimed that all these activities were initiated for political
reasons  and not for security concerns, which Mr. MacIntosh confirmed and
that going over these activities was therefore  irrelevant.
Mr. Lindsay then claimed that the Minister was likely influenced by these
organisations and person to issue the Security Certificate, which Mr.
MacIntosh denied, saying there was no such evidence. Nevertheless, Mr.
Lindsay pointed out that likely Ms. Citron's actions had led to some
government actions such as the formation of a "Toronto Mayors against Hate"
group.
Mr. Lindsay then presented a number of newspaper articles on the terror
activities by these groups  such as a June 12, 1993 report by the  Toronto
"Globe and Mail" about how the ARA trashed the home of a Mr. Schipper,
while the police looked on, two  Toronto "SUN" articles, one of May 8, 1995
 reporting on the "VE DAY BLAZE Zundel's home, HQ torched"   and May 21,
1995 about a bomb mailed to Mr. Z., from a P.O. Box in Vancouver, B.C. ,
two "Toronto Star" articles of July 20, reporting on a probe by the RCMP
about the bombs mailed from B.C. by the "Anti-Fascist Militia" to Mr. Z.
and three other persons and  of November 1995; how leading members of the
Toronto "Anti-Racist Action", (ARA), a radical Marxist group, had put up
posters in the streets near Mr. Z's home inciting the public to commit
arson against Mr. Z. home, the address was included,  and possibly murder
him by showing a picture of him in the crosshair of a gun and calling him
"GURU of HATE". Toronto police, whom Mr. Z. informed of these
. . . . . . /  2
-  2  -

activities were very slow to respond. When Mr. Z. tried to lay charges with
the police the staff sergeant on duty did not create a document recording
this request, or even Mr. Z.'s appearance. Whether the ARA people were
questioned or linked to the posters is still not known to Mr. Z. to this day.
Other activities of these organizations were to hold demonstrations
involving from 200 to 1,000 person to drive him out of the neighborhood, a
plan  with which they did not succeed, as the neighbours continued to
tolerate Mr. Z's presence and never made any threats of any kind  against him.

Finally he (not the aggressors) was dragged before the so-called "Human
Rights Commission"

In order to show that despite everything,  Mr. Z. had a private, very human
life during this turbulent period,  Mr. Lindsay then discussed Mr. Z.s'
brief marriage to and divorce from "Irene", a 18 year younger, single
mother who knew about Mr. Z. troubles and also had some medical problems of
her own,  as well as an 8 year son,  but whose overriding need was, to have
a father figure for her son. "Irene" claimed initially not to be interested
in politics; however, during the divorce proceedings  she gave testimony
slanted against Mr. Z.

After the divorce from "Irene" Mr. Z. got emotionally closer to Dr. I.
Rimland and they proceeded to buy a property in Tennessee and he decided to
join her there, feeling better protected under the Freedom of Speech
guaranteed by the American Constitution. Dr. Rimland has a PhD in child
psychology, is a teacher, lecturer and author of several very powerful and
moving books, such as a trilogy called "Lebensraum", "The Furies and The
Flames ", "The Wanderers" and others, dealing with her very hard, but
eventful and hope inspiring life.

Judge Blais then said that he recognizes that Mr. Z, did not produce as
much of his "usual" material in Tennessee as he had in Canada.
Mr. Z. replied that this was,  because his turbulent past in Canada had
made him temporarily somewhat "antisocial' and also that his health had
been affected  to the extent that he began studying  the promises of
alternative medicine.

Mr. Lindsay then introduced a folder containing over fifty personal letters
of support for Mr. Z., some of which were actually read out, over the
objections of the Crown Attorney McIntosh, who characterized them, without
have read a single one, as irrelevant, as they would not contain any
evidence regarding the Security issue but would allow Mr. Z  to conduct a
popularity contest. The Judge however, felt that he was allowed under the
rules of this Legislation to cast as wide a net as possible to be able to
fathom Mr. Z. motives and to get a feel for Mr. Z. relations with the
people around the world. However, he would not feel obliged to comment on
every single one of them.
. . . .   /   3

-  3  -

Mr. Lindsay pointed out that all of his efforts today were an attempt to
provide some context.

Judge Blais then returned to the events surrounding the bombs sent from
B.C.   to Mr. Z. and expressed his disbelief  about the fact that Mr. Z.
had never been informed about the outcome of the RCMP probe on the four
men, who had been identified by name as the "bombers". He felt that Mr. Z.
was entitled to this information. At first Mr. Lindsay offered to find it,
but then the Judge charged the Crown Attorney Mr. McIntosh with this task.

In conclusion, Mr. Z. was then outlining his 25 years of efforts through
meetings with and corresponding with Jewish intellectuals, rabbis, writers,
filmmakers and journalists to bring about some reconciliation between the
Jews and the Germans.

Next Sessions are scheduled for: April 13 - 14, April 29 and 30, and May 4,
5 and 6th for further cross-examination of the CSIS agent by the Crown and
final arguments.

BRAD LOVE LETTER FROM PRISON - FEBRUARY 22, 2004

Paul,

I got to thinking about the treatment Ernst Zundel is receiving at the West [Toronto Detention Center]. So, I thought I'd write further on my experience within such an oppressive jail. That stuff about keeping his towel/soap, etc. outside of his cell is both unusual and new to my ears but, let's face it, when engaged in a political struggle, it is dirty tricks galore.

As for the rest of the West which Ernst Zundel does not see, thankfully, the population is mostly ethnic [Tamils, East Indians, Blacks, Asians] and both loud and unruly with 30 inmates crammed into ten cells made for 20. The TV blares rap music all day, subjecting all to violent anti-White, "bitch-ass, mother fucker" rantings of BET'S latest hero who makes big money saying the same thing that got me jailed. Never once do you see a hockey game or al news broadcast and, being culturally isolated, you get the feeling you are locked up in a foreign nation. Programs are nil. Jobs scarce. There is no direction or instruction, little communication between with guards and it is a walk-on-eggshells-watch-what-you-say-and-do existence. Fights? Never. Beatings? Plenty and it is six on one, often culturally/racially motivated with a lone, singled-out white inmate carried off to the medical unit. Not good and to most who are new to the system, it is an eye opening nightmare. Too often, you are in a range where it is you and 26 other black gangsters in for the various squabbles that our media tells us of daily.

Some sit for years. You fight over the phone, showers and even food. Inmates hand out meds taken from a cart that a guard pushes onto the range but leaves once they have been counted. Even the guards look as if they would rather be somewhere else and they, too, are like the inmates. They're paranoid, disenfranchised as their ranks, like most of the city, have been colorized. Most are afraid to say anything, question their indifferent superiors, make decisions, to show any consideration for an inmate, would be seen as "soft" or not one of us. They obey orders to the "T" and make great Nazis. Buck-passing is an art form within these walls. As diverse as the place is, most inmates are being held on frivolous types of "he said, she said" domestic issues or for drunken squabbles which led to police being summoned and guess who is led away? Back and forth to bail court they go. The docket is full. They can't be heard. Their families in court to post bail suffer accordingly and, in the end, too many plead guilty just to put an end to such a farce. This isn't justice, of course but lawyers too afraid to face aggressive politically correct Crown attorneys and victims [women's] services groups often go along with such a travesty and allow their clients to be convicted of something they didn't do. Jobs are lost. Families destroyed and it is a wonder why these guys even want release for when they are released, due to court orders, they have no home to return to.

It is my belief that police who now never exercise any discretionary powers, simply charge everyone with multiple counts, so in the end, the accused will be found guilty of something, anything. Then, their bosses can go to the local politicos and cry: "See how bad crime is! Look at our conviction rate. We need more money, now!" It is being artificially inflated why, at the same time, the bad-asses remain free. Cops, like everyone else take the path of least resistance and pick out easy targets first. And no one but those who have been jailed have seen the mess up close and personal are able to call out such inconsistencies but by then, we are just convicted offenders, putting forth "sour grapes".

One would think that many of these individuals who are put through this wringer, would, when existing the jail's rear door, go around to the front door and register some kind of formal complaint. But, here again, the new Canadian model of "Better-not-say-anything" overcomes common sense and righteousness does or says anything. Perhaps, they are just so glad to be free, [that] such euphoria blinds them through what they just went through. I imagine the powers that be count on such behavior. Or maybe they simply know that "You couldn't pay Canadians to protest". Gay rights, different tribes marching on foreign embassies or various unions bitching about more money, sure they will hit the streets. But the average Joe gathering to protest life and death issues like crime, illegal immigration or the right to speak about some question, forget it! Look at the recent occurrences. A cop shot in the arm, three dead near an Asian body rub pallor, numerous violent attacks on the streets, yet, night after night, the media concentrates on Don Cherry, Conan O'Brien or some sick dogs in a park. Some priorities, eh?

Where is our legal community throughout all of this? Seems they will jump at a dime to represent the criminal and terror vermin among us, the Almarei's who can given no legitimate reason as to why they are here, but should the average Joe try to fight for his rights, the phone just keeps on ringing. It is the "foreigners first" mentality that is out there. Meanwhile, our cops utter phrases like: "Any civil disobedience will not be tolerated." or "Such intolerance threatens all communities and will be dealt with accordingly". Blah-blah-blah! Such robots!

To kill my days in this $85 million loony bin, I write to various news outlets expounding on my opinions of what they do or do not tell me. I have a list of political [personalities] that I am banned by court order from writing to. But no one says I cannot write about them or point out their inconsistencies and failures. I usually tell my addressees [The Toronto Star or City TV] to feel free to pass my letters on to all concerned and, like my previous writings, I get very few replies. They must say to themselves: "Love, he is in jail and he is still writing".

To which I say: "The problem that I write about is still out there, isn't it?" So, then how can I simply pass by the burning house with the child screaming at the window without doing my civic duty? And at every opportunity, I point at the way the media constantly promotes multiculturalism and immigration at all costs through their feel-good articles and cozy homespun exposes all the while glossing over the body count that they show us during the first 38 seconds of their nightly newscasts. Such negligence, indifference, aiding and abetting! All of those dead victims need a voice and, although, I do not give a rat's ass about most of them as they are or were criminals themselves, I do realize that to speak out now helps to protect me and my community as I am sure there is a huge roll call of folks out there who have attended funerals and think to themselves: "Why didn't I speak out?" Of course, dressed in funeral black, it is a little late for them to say anything. But, knowing all of this, I press on.

My/our struggle is just! What motivates us may be personal but it is the big picture that one must take in when the issue of: "Why stick your neck out?" comes up. I would rather be a loud and truthful antagonist than a dead, innocent bystander who never uttered a peep. You know, like Derek Wah Yan, who was killed when a gangster's bullet struck his Sadlee Cove Cres home. Cops said he was in the wrong place at the wrong time. But since when is your own home the wrong place. What a pitiful force that claims to protect us from the foreign vermin that their paymasters have unleashed upon our nation. No wonder no one calls cops any more unless, of course, you get a letter from Brad Love. I wonder if my arresting officer, Peter Heard, at YRP [York Regional Police] sit up at night thinking: "Yep, that crazy pen master was right all along!"

Brad Love

P.S. Don't you feel so much safer now that Roy McMurtry [the former Tory Attorney General of Ontario and now Chief Justice of Ontario], a dimwit who had so much to do with Ernst Zundel's original prosecution is now taking charge of Toronto's war on guns and games. Yeah, me neither!