|
Ontario appeal court approves Zündel
hearing
|
By KIRK MAKIN, JUSTICE REPORTER
From Friday's Globe and Mail
March 12/04 |
The Ontario Court of Appeal has scheduled a rush hearing of a
constitutional challenge by Ernst Zündel to ensure the case is
heard before the internationally known Holocaust-denier can be
deported to Germany.
Over objections from the Crown yesterday, Mr. Justice Marc
Rosenberg said a three-judge panel will hear the case in mid-May.
Mr. Zündel aims to strike down a controversial anti-terrorism
measure known as a security certificate that is used to deport
non-citizens who may pose a security risk. A security certificate is
signed by two federal cabinet ministers who, based on secret
intelligence, decide that an immigrant should be deported as a
danger to Canadians.
Even alleged spies and terrorists normally targeted this way
are not permitted access to the precise allegations against them.
Judge Rosenberg made his ruling yesterday after hearing
defence lawyers Peter Lindsay and Chi-Kun Shi argue that their
client has been in solitary confinement for a year and faces
deportation as soon as a Federal Court of Canada judge completes a
review of his case.
They also cited a dramatic speech made by Federal Court of
Canada judge to a security conference in 2002. It went unreported at
the time, but Mr. Justice James Hugesson roundly condemned the
security certificate procedure.
The veteran judge said there was widespread discomfort on the
Federal Court bench about the way fundamental legal rights are
denied under the process. "I can tell you because we talked
about it; we hate it," he said. "We hate hearing only one
party. We hate having to decide what, if any, sensitive material can
or should be conveyed to the other party."
The judge said he felt like "a bit of a fig leaf"
used to cover a dubious procedure.
"This is not a happy posture for a judge, and you are in
fact looking at an unhappy camper when I tell you about this
function," Judge Hugesson said. "With these national
security affidavits, if they are successful in persuading the judge,
they will never see the light of day. The fact that something
improper has been said to the court may never be revealed."
While Justice Department lawyers strive to be fair at security
certificate hearings, he said there is no substitute for having two
opposing parties reveal the shortcomings of the each other's
arguments.
"It does not matter how good and how honest the lawyer
is," he said. "If you have a case that is only being
presented on one side, you are not going to get a good case."
Mr. Zundel retired to the United States three years ago. Last
year, he was arrested and returned to Canada after failing to make a
routine appointment with U.S. Immigration Services. The federal
government commenced deportation proceedings.
Mr. Justice Pierre Blais of the Federal Court of Canada has
been conducting a review of the certificate for several months, and
is scheduled to hear final arguments in early May. Since there is no
appeal of a certificate review, an adverse decision would mean Mr.
Zundel's immediate deportation.
"If this proceeding is not expedited, it will likely be
moot," Mr. Lindsay told Judge Rosenberg yesterday. "The
German government has already offered to pick Mr. Zundel up on two
existing warrants for denying the Holocaust. Mr. Zundel could be on
a plane to Germany and a jail cell before his constitutional rights
are determined."
Mr. Zundel lived in Canada for 42 years with a clean criminal
record.
However, Crown counsel Donald MacIntosh argued that the courts
have already effectively decided against the constitutional issues
Mr. Zundel intends to raise. He said that in any case, an Ontario
Court of Appeal ruling would not be binding on Federal Court judges.
The only unclassified portion of the security certificate
against Mr. Zundel accuses him of being a dangerous preacher of
anti-Semitic, white-supremacist hatred. Even if he doesn't advocate
violence, it reads, he is dangerous because he's seen as a guru by
those who do.
Of the 27 security certificates issued since 1991 — only
five since the 9/11 attack — virtually all have involved suspected
terrorists from such countries as Iran and Algeria.

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 7:51 PM
Subject: VICTORY: ZUNDEL WINS EXPEDITED HEARING
Dear Free Speech Supporter:
Somewhat as rare as a ripe strawberry in an Arctic March, there's
been a major Zundel victory in a Canadian court!
On Thursday, March 11, Mr. Zundel's lawyers Peter Lindsay and his
wife and law partner Chi-Kun Shi appeared in the Ontario Court of
Appeals seeking an expedited hearing for Mr. Zundel's appeal against
the decision of Madam Justice Benotto turning down Mr. Zundel's habeas
corpus motion. The appeal had been set for June 9, 2004.
However, the CSIS Certificate Review before federal judge Mr. Pierre
Blais, the former solicitor-general and boss of CSIS, could well be
over by then. A negative decision by Mr. Justice Blais, finding the
decision of the two ministers to sign the decision
"reasonable", would automatically convert the certificate
into a deportation order that could not be appealed.
Thus, it's vital to the cause of justice for Mr. Zundel that his
appeals in provincial and federal court be heard soon. [The Federal
Court of Appeal has still not ruled on a motion staying the
certificate hearings pending an appeal of certain of Mr. Justice
Blais's decisions.]
Peter Lindsay reports:
"We won the motion to expedite the appeal to the Court of
Appeal of Ontario. The appeal has, thus, been moved up from June 9,
2004 to May 10, 2004. This will allow us to have the appeal heard
before the end of the certificate review."
Ruling for Mr. Zundel, Mr. Justice Marc Rosenberg, a former criminal
defence lawyer, held:
"In my view, this appeal should be expedited. I am not required
to deal with the merits of the proposed appeal. My concern with the
June date is that the appeal may be moot and that the moving party
[Mr. Zundel] remains in custody at this time. Traditionally, habeas
corpus matters are expedited. The appeal is set for May 10,
2004."
Consulting with Mr. Lindsay, Wednesday, I learned that Donald
MacIntosh, the Crown Attorney, as one might expect in this bitter
struggle, had strongly opposed an expedited hearing in his written
submissions. Mr. Lindsay concluded: "The Crown seems to want to
make certain that the constitutional issues in the Zundel case will
not be heard."
Speaking of the recently publicized e-mails between CSIS and federal
immigration authorities and their contacts with U.S. immigration
authorities after 2001, Mr. Lindsay said: "It's clear from the
correspondence between CSIS lawyer Murray Rodych and officials at
Immigration that they were out to screw Ernst Zundel. It had nothing
to do with 'national security'! They've been trying to deport him
since 1985." Mr. Lindsay referred to the absolutely
uncharacteristic speed with which the Department of Immigration
moved to initiate deportation proceedings (later overturned) against
Mr. Zundel immediately after his 1985 conviction (subsequently
overturned by the Supreme Court of Canada in 1992) for publishing
"false news" in challenging the Hollywood version of World
War II.
Paul Fromm
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION
The Zundel Defence Fund Needs Your Help Today
January and February have been very expensive months for the Zundel
case. We have spent just over $70,000. Yes, part of this was to
bring the Lindsays up to speed in the case. We had six court dates
-- four in federal court and two in Superior Court in Ontario for a
habeas corpus motion in November and December and eight more in
January and February. Canada's vindictive systgem madet Ernst
Zundelspend Christmas in prison. April promises to be an expensive
month, with four days planned in Federal Court -- April 13, 14, 29
and 30.
The Defence Fund is very seriously depleted and we face major
outlays in the New Year. I again ask for your commitment and urgent
help. Please mail us your contribution today or e-mail us your VISA
number and expiry date. We have a number of delicate colour-pencil
sketches by Ernst Zundel done in prison. Each is dated and signed.
Each is a nature study. Mr. Zundel has long been a paint and sketch
artist. He had returned to his love of art before the U.S. I.N.S
picked him up and deported him. All donors of $100 or more will
receive one of these sketches. Mail your donation today to CAFE, Box
332, Rexdale, ON., M9W 5L3, Canada or e-mail us your VISA number and
expiry date. On your cheque or an accompanying piece of paper, note:
"For Zundel Defence Fund."

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 7:51 PM
Subject: ZUNDEL PERSECUTION IS PART OF LIBERAL SCANDAL IN
OTTAWA
Dear Free Speech Supporter:
I visited Ernst Zundel in the Metro West Detention Centre on
Wednesday, March 10. He's been contemplating the unravelling of the
sick and corrupt Liberal Party establishment in Ottawa. This is the
grafting, arrogant lot who use the Canadian Security and
Intelligence (CSIS) as their political police.
Mr. Zundel sees himself as a particular victim of the Liberal Party,
having crossed them over 35 years ago, when, as a young,
anti-communist upstart German, he put himself forth in the 1968
Liberal leadership race, the one that eventually elected socialist
Pierre Elliott Trudeau, a Mao and Castro admirer. "I am their
victim," Mr. Zundel told me. "I'm collateral damage to the
Liberal Party elite in Ottawa, who wear Gucci loafers and carry
briefcases instead of Uzis!"
An angry Gerard Pelletier, one of the "three wise men"
recruited with Trudeau, snapped at Mr. Zundel during that
convention: "Germans should be seen and not heard."
"Back in the late 1960s, I distributed tens of thousands of Ron
Gostick's Canadian Intelligence Service leaflet warning about CAPRI
-- the Canadian Peace Research Institute -- which made the
connection between pro-communist leftists like Rev. Endicott and an
up-and-coming politician named Pierre Trudeau," Mr. Zundel
recalls. "Many in the Liberal Party were furious at me for
blowing the whistle on leftists like Trudeau, Andre Ouellett, and
Gerard Pelletier -- who were the Trotskyist neo-Cons of their
day."
Not long after the 1968 Liberal Party Convention, Mr. Zundel's
Canadian citizenship application was turned down. In 1981, Mr.
Zundel's postal privileges were revoked after agitation by Jewish
groups. In 1982, they were re-instated, but Mr. Zundel had to learn
of the reasons from Jewish publications. He was repeatedly denied a
written copy of the judgement. He wrote to then-Minister Trudeau
requesting a copy of his own judgement. "The former Prime
Minister let his secretary write a letter stating that I would not
be given the reasons 'while I'm Prime Minister,'" Mr. Zundel
recalls.
"I severely antagonized elements in the Liberal Party. That's
why I have twice been denied citizenship. As the late Lady Jane
Birdwood wrote, this is "the longest hatred!" he says.
"I'm being treated like the classic whistleblower. I'm the
victim of a confluence of Liberal Party and Jewish lobby influence
going back to Dean Maxwell Cohen," who wrote the infamous Cohen
Report on Hate Propaganda, which paved the way for the
passage of the "hate law", Canada's gag law, now Sections
318-319 of the Criminal Code.
"The denial of my citizenship application was entirely
arbitrary," Mr. Zundel explains. When defence team lawyer
Barbara Kulazska applied under the Access to Information Act some
years ago, "she found nothing in the files."
Former key advisor to Jean Chretien, "Jean Carle, Denis Coderre
and Martin Cauchon have made my life miserable," said Mr.
Zundel, referring to key Ottawa Liberals, the latter two who were,
until very recently, Minister of Immigration and Minister of
Justice, respectively.
Mr. Zundel keeps reasonably well informed on the news from the daily
papers sent to him. He commented on the surge of Third World crime
in Toronto -- the Vietnamese marijuana grow-ops, the endless Black,
mostly Jamaican, gang shootings. He observed: "Boy, are
Canadians ever paying a steep price in lives and taxpayers' money
for being too stupid, lazy and politically naive to stop the
immigration insanity in the late 1960s and early 1970s, when there
was still time to do it. I can't help but feel a certain amount of
glee, when I read all these self-inflicted inconveniences. Actions
have consequences!"
Paul Fromm
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION