Dear Fellow Patriot!


Veteran revisionist Bradley R. Smith launched his
campaign to de-criminalize "holocaust" history by
introducing a booklet with the same title. Mr. Smith
is a speaker at the 2004 International Revisionist
Conference in Sacramento.

Bradley Smith is the only revisionist who has made it
his life's work to educate campuses throughout America
on the "holocaust" issue. Not as a "holocaust"
revisionist, but as a freedom of speech activist. He
has earned my utmost respect for these efforts. His
booklet is about 20 pages and revolves around the open
debate about the dissenting history.

"No one should be imprisoned for writing a book,"

is the motto. Free speech is the overall issue of the
campaign. Some of us have become so obsessed with our
issues that they compromise some of the fundamental
things about "holocaust" revisionism. I've seen this
many times. Revisionists compromise in order to stop
the severe attacks of the enemy. Even though it never
works, you can find these statements in many
revisionist books. For example, some agree that there
were gassings, but not in gas chambers, and so forth.

On page six of the booklet, Mr. Smith writes:

"There is no doubt that the Nazis committed many
inexcusable crimes during the war....."

This stuff gets my blood boiling.... Nazis committing
many inexcusable crimes? No examples? It's not open
for debate? It defeats the very purpose of the entire
campaign. No examples are given what these "many
inexcusable crimes" are.

I say there is no such thing then "Nazis committing
inexcusable crimes!" What is excusable in a war? That
the Americans eliminated entire villages during the
Viet-nam war? Or the British enslaving thousands of
people in their colonies? Or how about Iraq and
Afghanistan? We need to be very careful as
revisionists when making statements like these. The
enemy will pick them out and will say "Look, even
"holocaust" deniers say that the Nazis 'committed many
inexcusable crimes'."

Again, there were no gas chambers, gas vans, or any
inexcusable crimes. In a war, anything could be
inexcusable. It depends on who writes history. As an
American of German heritage, I have seen many
inexcusable crimes in the US, without them being at
war. We cannot single out atrocities that are normal
during wars, for one, and not from the other.

"There is no doubt that the Nazis committed many
inexcusable crimes during the war," is a statement
that continues the demonization of the Germans and
makes questioning the "holocaust" kind of a paradox.
One cannot say they committed many inexcusable crimes,
except the "holocaust." One statement is like the
other. Especially when one leaves it up in the air
without giving examples.

What are these inexcusable crimes during the war that
Bradley Smith is talking about? The incarceration of
Jews in camps because they were considered a national
security risk? But what about the internment camps in
the USA? Or how about Ernst Zundel in Canada?

As often as definitions change today, ones atrocity
becomes for some a heroic act, and ones heroic action
become atrocities for others.

I believe that revisionists need to stay away from
statements like these. It serves no purpose, unless
someone wants to earn some brownie points with the
enemy.

Was the "holocaust" or wasn't it, is the issue. And
once one believes the "holocaust" is a lie, one cannot
say, "there is no doubt that the Nazis committed many
inexcusable crimes."

Nevertheless, I believe the campaign to decriminalize
"holocaust" history is badly needed and that's why I
support veteran revisionist Bradley R. Smith. You can
do the same by helping him to print this booklet:

5000 copies cost $1,005, or about 22 cents per copy.
10000 cost $1,339, or about 14 cents per copy. And so
on. The more he can print, the less expensive each
copy is.

You can e-mail Bradley Smith at

bradley@telnor.com

or check out his new website at

http://www.outlawhistory.com

*******************************************************

Horst Mahler announces that the Kellog website is also
produced now in English:

[START]

Bekanntmachung

Das elektronische Schaufenster des Deutschen Kollegs
ist nun auch in englischer Sprache abrufbar. Es ist
unter

http://www.deutsches-kolleg.org/english

zu finden und auch über die deutsche Seite erreichbar.
Diese ist weiterhin unter

http://www.deutsches-kolleg.org

zu finden.

[END]

*******************************************************

From the Adelaide Institute comes this:

[START]

Horst Mahler predicts victory against the Auschwitz
Lie and claims there will be a re-hearing of the 1960s
Frankfurt Auschwitz trial with new evidence - soon.
 
Stay tuned - Mahler makes it happen in Germany.
 
Legal developments occur only where there are strong
individuals who stand firm on their principles of
truth and justice, without fear.  Horst Mahler is
fearless and he shames all those Germans who fear the
loss of their livelihood, fear the loss of their life,
and fear the fear of FEAR.
 
Fredrick Töben
 
Subject: Der Auschwitzprozeß wird wieder aufgerollt

Horst Mahler

Offener Brief an den

Verein zur Rehabilitierung der wegen Bestreitens des
Holocausts Verfolgten (VRBHV)

zu Händen von Bernhard Schaub und Ursula Haverbeck

Aufstand für die Wahrheit - Stand der Dinge

Liebe Ursula, lieber Bernhard,

wenn der Stein erst einmal ins Rollen versetzt ist,
geht es oft schneller voran, als angenommen. Für den
Februar 2004 waren die  ersten Wiederaufnahmeanträge
(in den Fällen Germar Rudolf und Dr. Hans-Dietrich
Sander)  vorgesehen. Im Dezember 2003 fand eine erste
Arbeitssitzung mit Prof. Dr. Robert  Faurisson und
Ahmed Rami, dem Chef  von "Radio Islam", in Vichy
statt. Seit  Weihnachten 2003 laufen die
Vorbereitungen auf Hochtouren.

Die im Februar 2004 begonnene Hauptverhandlung gegen
die Vorarbeiter des Deutschen Kollegs - Uwe Meenen,
Reinhold Oberlercher und Horst Mahler  (MOM) - wegen
Volksverhetzung vor der 22. Gr. Strafkammer des
Landgerichts Berlin erweist sich dank der
hervorragenden Mitarbeit des Staatsanwalts Krüger als
ideale Auftaktveranstaltung. Dieser Jurist hat meine
Einlassung in diesem Verfahren zum Anlaß für
zahlreiche Ermittlungsverfahren "wegen Leugnung des
Holocausts" genommen. Wenn er weiter so schneidig
vorgeht, wird es alsbald eine entsprechende Anklage
gegen mich geben. Wird dann auch noch das
Hauptverfahren eröffnet, haben wir erreicht, was wir
mit der Vereinsgründung angestrebt haben: es wird
gegen "eine weltbekannte Person der Zeitgeschichte"
eine öffentliche Hauptverhandlung wegen "Leugnung des
Holocausts" geben. Damit ergibt sich zum ersten Male
in der Geschichte die Gelegenheit, den
"Auschwitzprozeß" wiederaufzurollen und die erst nach
dem Nürnberger Militärtribunal und nach dem
Frankfurter Auschwitzprozeß  erarbeiteten Beweise zur
Widerlegung  der offiziellen Geschichtsschreibung mit
einem weltweiten Echo "gerichtsnotorisch" zu machen.
Unter Führung von Prof. Dr. Robert Faurisson steht die
internationale Gemeinde der dem Revisionismus
zugerechneten Wissenschaftler  "Gewehr bei Fuß", um in
das Geschehen einzugreifen. Eine bisher nicht gekannte
Entschlossenheit greift um sich:  Am 5. Dezember 2003
schrieb Faurisson an mich: "Mark my last words :
,Zusammen ins Gefängnis !'"Ahmed Rami  hat eine
intensive Berichterstattung für die islamischen Länder
zugesagt.

Die Wahrscheinlichkeit, daß die Wiederaufnahmeanträge
als unzulässig verworfen werden könnten und deshalb
eine öffentliche Hauptverhandlung gar nicht
stattfinden würde, war bei der Vorbereitung der
Vereinsgründung von uns als recht hoch eingeschätzt
worden. Diese Befürchtung ist jetzt gegenstandslos. Es
spricht nunmehr eine überwiegende Wahrscheinlichkeit
dafür, daß es diese öffentliche Verhandlung geben
wird. Der Versuch von Herrn Krüger, mich durch ein
sofort wirkendes vorgreifliches Berufsverbot als
Verteidiger für den kommenden "Großen Auschwitzprozeß"
auszuhebeln, geht ins Leere, da ich mich im Falle
einer gegen mich erhobenen Anklage selbstverständlich
selbst verteidigen kann, auch wenn ich mit einem
Berufsverbot belegt werden sollte.

Die Würfel sind gefallen.  Ich bin glücklich, daß das
Schicksal mich ausersehen  hat,  diesen Schlag gegen
unsere Feinde zu führen. "Die Wahrheit siegt!" "Die
Lüge vernichtet sich selbst."

Mit reichstreuen Grüßen

Horst Mahler

[END]

*******************************************************

Schleyer vs. Dr. Countess:

[START]

Prof. Robert H. Countess, Ph.D.
Toney, Alabama

Dear Dr. Countess:

I very much appreciate your retort to Rabbi Ariel Bar
Tzadok, who defends Jewish atrocities, as reported by
Mr. Mueller.  Your argument seems to relieve Abraham
of the faults of Talmudism but Hegel's 'Spirit of
Judaism' works consistently to the contrary.
Recently, I had occasion to summarize the Jewish
problem for a Christian in Iowa whose entire life is
devoted to resolute struggle against feticide.  In his
response, he seemed to think that if they are Children
of Satan then they must be all-powerful.  The
following was my reply:

"I do not hold that the Jews are all-powerful; on the
contrary, true theology teaches that they live in
bondage to a finite and totally false conception of
God that amounts to self-worship. 

"As the mirror of Jewish racial exclusiveness and
Self-Will, Yahweh is Satan, the Essence of Evil. As
the embodiment of Jewish self-worship and Self-Will,
Judah is Satan, living Temptor and Seducer. These are
vibrant truths and not metaphors.  Satan also finds
residence elsewhere in the World, but not in this
special way, as among people who PRAY FOR EVIL.
This is akin to sorcery and just as wicked.

"True Theology, a citation to which you have been
given [i.e., Hegel], teaches that the Children of
Satan, like the rest of Mankind, are actors in God
Himself.  They serve Him despite their wickedness.  He
permits them to follow Abraham's folly as they wish,
to freely express devotion to a limited (finite) and
hence inherently satanic concept of the divine. For
in the end, Mankind learns the painful lesson that
Hypocrisy and Self-Deceit are practically
indistinguishable and equally deadly. 

"Notwithstanding the foregoing, if you prefer, the
Bible alone is sufficient indictment of the Jews as
the Children of Satan:

HOLY SCRIPTURE

'You want to kill me, a man who has told you the truth
. . . .  You are doing your father's work,' Jesus
said.

'The only father we have is God,' replied the Jews.

'If God were your father, you would love me, since I
have my origin in God and have come from him . . . . 
You are from your father, Satan, the father of Lies,
and you prefer to do what your father wants because
you
cannot bear to listen to my words . . . .  It is
because I speak the truth that you do not believe me .
. . .  The reason why you do not listen is
that you are not from God,' answered Christ Jesus
(John 8:42-47).

INTERPRETATION:

"It is important to see through the Jews even as
Christ Jesus himself taught us.  Despite how THEY beat
their breasts and say 'Lord, Lord,' their Yahweh, as
Christ perceived, is really an evil manifestation of
their own Self-Will as racially 'chosen' ones. Evil
and nothing but evil resides in their hearts as long
as they persist in their perverse claim to racial
superiority and lyingly call it religion. 

"Good Christians should never deprive any Jew of food
or shelter and must punish Jews only for criminal
behavior and commercial cheating.  But to give them
admission to one's society, to grant them civil
rights, or to tolerate their presence without
conversion to Christianity (they would then cease to
be Jews) is to invite political slavery and death.
This is simply a fact of life, well-demonstrated,
beginning with Christ Jesus and extending to the
present day."

I would emphasize for you, sir, the strict conclusion
of philosophical-theological analysis of Judaism:  IT
IS NOT AND NEVER WAS A RELIGION.  Therefore, Judaism
should not receive the traditional respect accorded
religious belief.  Laws pertaining to protection of
religion as a matter of conscience should not and
cannot pertain to Judaism.  This matter deserves
closer investigation, of course, but the political
implications in the struggle against Talmudic
Despotism are profound.

R. Schleyer, M.A.
1080 Patterson Street, #908
Eugene, Oregon 97401 USA
schleyer@earthlink.net

[END]

*******************************************************

See you at the 2004 International Revisionist
Conference in Sacramento, held on April 24th and 25th,
hosted by the European American Culture Council,
sponsored by the Adelaide Institute!

Organizer: Walter F. Mueller

thetruthisback@yahoo.com

Make your reservations today by contacting

hansgemuetlich@yahoo.com


Walter F. Mueller
"The truth is back in business"

The "Patriot Letter" is a free news service of
Community News, a monthly publication with a
circulation of 20,000. To subscribe to Community News
please e-mail for more information.

To be removed from this e-mail list, reply with
"unsubscribe".

----- Original Message -----