----- Original Message ----- From: Alain J To: Adelaide Institute ; David A. Astin Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 2:06 PM Subject: Re: Professor Robert Faurisson's Summing-Up of what Revisionism is all about     Professor Faurisson could perhaps be accused of acquiescing in the Jewish desire to place their own historical experience (or historical fantasy) at the centre of human history. Of course, their current trump card is "the holocaust", and no doubt it is very important that independent historians continue to investigate all the anomalies in this essentially religious dogma. Professor Faurisson seems to be despairing that not enough independent historians are accepting the handing over of that baton.   One could equally argue that the intellectual argument over "the holocaust" is essentially won. A few extra footnotes may need to be added, but the outline is now clear - to anyone who chooses to examine the subject with an open mind.   Some of us may think that now is the time to stand up for our right NOT to have an alien people dictate to us that we must grovel to their interpretation of what history is all about. Every day there are hundreds of examples in the media of Jews trying to make their own historical (or fantasy) experience central to the collective experience of all the rest of us. Some of these examples are trivial, compared to what Professor Faurisson has been so eminently concerned with. But all of them serve the same purpose: to create a Judeocentric vision of humanity's past. In contrast to Professor Faurisson's pessimism I think we are now living in an era when we really can - and should - challenge every distorted claim of the Jews and their suborned culture-distorters, no matter how trivial.   Here is one example. In The Weekend Australian of 21/2/04 someone called Norman McGreevy (of the heavily Jewish Melbourne suburb of Malvern) wrote that:    "Tasmanian Labor MP Harry Quick (20/2) has chosen his words poorly in his quoted comments on Jewish critics of Mel Gibson's The Passion of The Christ. 'For the Jewish lobby to say it is anti-Semitic is a bit beyond the pale,' Quick said. A quick historical refresher. Tsars confined Jews to the 'Pale of Settlement', 25 provinces of the Russian empire. To live 'beyond the pale', a Jew needed special permission from the notoriously anti-Semitic authorities - and inside thousands of Jews were starved and beaten to death. Quick is correct in that the film 'had villains and heroes' but he is clearly no expert on what is offensively anti-Jewish and anti-Semitic."   No doubt poor Harry Quick is just some political hack from Tasmania, and we don't need to consider his feelings overmuch. But note the Judeophile arrogance of Mr McSweeny! He invokes some experience that Jews may or may not have had in Tsarist Russia in order to demand that Mr Quick not use an expression that was part of the English language in the time of Shakespeare. Luckily, another reader of The Australian cared more about our own linguistic heritage than about some alien "footnote in history", and replied as follows:   'Norman McGreevy (Letters, 21/2) needs a history lesson.The word "pale" was used in Shakespeare's time to signify a district or territory subject to a particular jurisdiction. The term was common enough in that sense for Shakespeare himself to use it allegorically in The Winter's Tale (iv, iii). From as early as 1547 a published source tells us that "Irland ... is deuided in ii part, one is the Englysh pale, & the other, the wyld Irysh" [original spelling]. The inhabitants of the English Pale had to pay the Irish what were called "Black Rents" - essentially, protection money. Hence anyone "beyond the pale" was perceived as potentially wild, lawless, dangerous, and generally unacceptable. Despite Mr McGreevy's haste to take offence, Russian Jews were not confined to their "Pale of Settlement" until 1792 - and our common English phrase "beyond the pale" was in use centuries before that time. Tasmanian Labor MP Harry Quick therefore does not deserve Mr McGreevy's censure. Mr Quick used the phrase in its traditional, and correct, sense. Good luck to him for choosing his words wisely!   - Alan James, Carlton, Vic'   That response was published in The Australian on Monday 23/2/04.   My feeling is that the great holocaust gas-libel is teetering so much that all their other minor lies can now be refuted in the mass media, if any so-called "activist" can be bothered to push the envelope. The traditional enemies of truth are rattled. Now is the time to rout them on any and every peripheral issue, just like a football team pushing the ball down the wing and the flanks and thereby ultimately besieging the opposition goal.   The momentum has passed to us. Not on the main issue (as defined by the Jews), of course; but to us anyway. As the Yanks say, "It's time to kick ass!"