|
The
End of the Moral View of History
will lead to the
Answer
of the Jewish Question
Horst Mahler
What
is rational
is
actual,
and
what is actual
is
rational
Hegel
The
End of the Moral View of History
will lead to the
Answer
of the Jewish Question
Notice of the Intention to defend against the Charge
of Incitement of the People, before the 22nd Grand
Division of the District Court of Berlin
(522) 81 Js 3570/KLs (01/03)
Some
prefatory reflections for the future
-
for the sake of thinking ahead.
You
will hear outrageous things and you will possibly become outraged.
The
lack of freedom is most tellingly revealed by the outrage felt at
thoughts. This is the thought-taboo which holds sway over our
thoughts and emotions.
Who
has managed to impose on us such thought-taboos? How have they done
so? Using what means?
And:
Who are the beneficiaries? Whom are they harming?
The
questions posed last lead to the trail of the perpetrators.
It
is not just our country in which it is extremely dangerous to remind
oneself that thoughts are not to be judged morally, and certainly
not according to whether they comply with political correctness or
not, but that thoughts are to be evaluated solely according to
whether they are true or false, whether they partake in the truth or
whether they do not partake in the truth. Let Möllemann,
Hohmann
and Günzel
be mentioned here.
Is
there anybody out there who seriously believes that we live in a
free society?
But
if we do not live in a free society, how then, is the condition of
our community to be characterised?
Where
there is freedom of thought, there the person mistaken is accepted.
But where the person who thinks differently is struck down by force
due to his differing opinion, there brutal arbitrary rule is
established. To break this rule is the highest imperative.
Whose
interests are they serving and what motivates them, they who pretend
that we live in freedom yet trample the most basic of freedoms under
their boots?
Are
they who act in this manner so weak that they are compelled to act
so, or are they just blinded, that they are unable to see what is
plainly before our eyes? What are they doing to regain their sight?
The
Germans will only be free again when the German Reich has regained
its ability to act.
The
path to the autonomy of the German Reich leads over the fall of
Jewish foreign rule.
Jewish
foreign rule will fall with the exposure of the
Auschwitz
Lie.
1.
Situational
Description
As
citizens of the German Reich we stand here – coerced by force –
in front of an organ of will of the Judeo-American enemy power, and
not in front of a German court.
The
Federal Republic of Germany is not a state but a Reich-destruction
regime which Carlo Schmid fittingly described as the “organisational
form of a modality of foreign
rule” (OMF).
All institutions of the OMF-FRG – that includes the entity seated
before us, which calls itself “22nd Grand Division of
the
Regional
Court
Berlin
”
– are institutions of the system of foreign rule. They are sailing
under false colours, in order to deceive the German People.
It
is unthinkable for us that we should justify ourselves in front of
this entity as before a German court, for this would mean that we
would accept this entity as a trial court, where in fact it is, in a
political trial, only a gun emplacement of the enemy in the war
against the German Reich.
The
German Reich did not go under in the military defeat of 1945. It
continues to exist as a subject of national and international right
(ius gentium). Through the
murder and internment of the members of its government, which
happened in violation of the ius gentium, the Reich merely lost its ability to act.
Under these circumstances, the autonomy of the Reich has in total
fallen back onto each individual citizen of the Reich, who, as a
part, is necessarily also the whole.
The
German Reich lives and is certainly immortal so long as there are
German families able to reproduce, in whom the will of the German
Reich is alive.
Each
citizen of the Reich is obliged to do everything within the bounds
of what can reasonably be expected of someone, to protect the right
of the Reich and to support the Reich regaining its ability to act.
The most important duty is to resist the system of foreign rule.
The
war aim of the enemies of
Germany
was and is the perpetual destruction of the German Reich.
This is only to be achieved through the physical extermination
and/or the dissolving of the German People in a mash of nations of
the various races.
From the viewpoint of our enemies, this is consistent. They are thus
not to be rebuked but are to be recognised, accepted and treated as
enemies.
In
order to suppress the resistance that is to be expected against this
work of destruction, which is to be wrought over a longer period of
time against a living folk-body, our enemies invented the Auschwitz
Lie.
This Lie is first of all to be recognised as a psychological weapon
against the German spirit, and is to be destroyed
2.
The discovery
of the Lie, and the consequences thereof
This
Lie, in which I believed to the bottom of my heart, overshadows my
entire life. I went my way as an enemy of the state, believing in
the Lie of the industrial extermination of European Jewry, until I
grasped the sense of the Hegelian sentence concerning the activity
of Reason as history of the world:
What
is rational is actual, and what is actual is rational.
With
this I was released from the wretched moral view of history and
became enabled to conceive the thought that Reason was at work in
the extermination of European Jewry, just as much as in the
extermination of the Native Americans or the depopulation of
Africa
through Jewish slave
traders, where an estimated 100 – 150 million people lost their
lives.
God
himself is the agony of history and the triumph of its
accomplishment. Neither Caesar – nor his cook – are responsible
for the
Roman Empire
.
The extermination of the Jews would then be, just as was the
extermination of the Native Americans, an act of God and as such not
a crime.
It
was probably necessary for me to take this diversion in order to
open up to the question of what is to be thought of the arguments of
those historians stigmatised as “Holocaust deniers”. The answer
that I finally found, filled me with gratitude towards those
steadfast men only devoted to the historical truth, who opened my
eyes. They had to pay a high price for their fearlessness– without
exception.
After
long years of a painful struggle for insight into the Jewish
Question and into the situation of my People, I have become deeply
convinced of the truth of the words of Jesus to the Jews:
Ye
are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will
do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the
truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he
speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it.
John
8:44
3.
The
path to understanding the nature of the animosity against the Jews
and the surmounting of the same
It was not belief in
the Bible which made me take this viewpoint, but the contemplation
on the paths of cognition set forth by German Idealistic Philosophy.
On these paths I finally came to distinguish the Germanic spirit as
the spirit of freedom, from the Jewish spirit as the spirit of
bondage.
I realised, that the animosity between Jews and Germans, but also
between Jews and all other Peoples lies enclosed herein.
The
thought of the finiteness of this animosity took hold of me even
stronger.
At
last, those hated by all will receive justice in the realisation
that Judaism is to freedom what the ugly caterpillar, or cocoon, is
to the butterfly that grows out of this ugliness. Setting out from
this thought, it is possible to imagine, and bring about, the future
final solution of the Jewish Question in a way which will be the
liberation of the Jews from their mania of chosenness.
This
mania leads the Jews to experience the ugliness of the caterpillar
as the perfected beauty of the butterfly, and makes them incapable
of recognising the perfection of the butterfly as such. Their
thoughts and energies are directed at destroying the beauty of the
butterfly, which exceeds their own – the caterpillar’s –
beauty.
Their
arrogance, which enables them to rule the world, will break in the
realisation that Yahweh is by nature Satan, the enemy of man and
adversary of God. The insight which is dawning amongst the Peoples,
that the Jews as a religious community are the embodiment of evil
and as brotherhood of Mammon spell the demise of the nations
(Peoples), will now take the oppressive power which Judaism still
possesses from it. For this oppressive power is founded solely in
the belief of the Peoples (generated through Jewish pretence and
Talmudic hypocrisy) that the Jew recognises them as spiritual
beings, and acts accordingly.
This
redemptive-historical line of development – let there be no doubt
about this – will only continue forward in world history through
severest struggles, which can also take a bloody course. At the end,
the Jews will die of a broken heart. Their death as Jews, however,
will be their resurrection as man.
Hegel’s
recognition of world history as being the struggle of the spirits,
is attested to the highest through the struggle of Germandom with
Judaism. Hegel describes the universality of world history as
follows:
...
the spirit is opposed to himself within himself; he must overcome
himself as the truly hostile obstacle of himself; development, which
in nature is a peaceful going-forth, is a hard, ceaseless fight
against itself. What the spirit wants, is to reach his concept; but
he himself covers the concept up, is proud and full of enjoyment in
the alienation of himself.
In
this manner, development is not the mere going-forth without
struggle or harm, like that of organic life, but is hard unwilling
work against itself; and furthermore, it is not just the merely
formal side of developing itself, but is the bringing-forth of a
purpose of a particular content. We have recognised this purpose
from the very beginning: it is the spirit, namely according to his
nature, the concept of freedom. This is the basic subject and
therefore also the leading principle of development ...
4.
The
self-conception of the Deutsches Kolleg as bringer of salvation for
Jewry
The Deutsches Kolleg
(Collegium Germanicum) believes in the German People, which as the
German Reich is a particular shape of God, and believes in the
vocation of the German People as it is recognised by Idealistic
Philosophy. This belief finds its expression in the Plan for the
Uprising which is deduced from the examination of the Redemptive
Historical Role of the German Reich.
The final chapter of this examination, which precedes the Plan for
the Uprising bears the heading: “The Foundation of the Fourth
Reich is the Reconciliation with the Jewish Spirit, which is its
Conquest”. The Jews would do well to take the path set out by the
Deutsches Kolleg, and to tackle the work of reconciliation
themselves, instead of continuing to follow their plan with the help
of Turkey,
to move Israel, their perishing state, to Germany by means of
joining the European Union. The continuation of the Jewish-Turkish
seizure of land would probably result in a hundred-year bloody war
in
Central Europe
. At the end of it, the
Jewish Question would finally be solved once and for all – albeit
not in the sense of the Plan for the Uprising as presented by the
Deutsches Kolleg.
According
to the Plan for the Uprising as presented by the Deutsches Kolleg,
the Jews have the opportunity to recognise themselves as a necessary
moment of the history of the European Peoples and their freedom, and
have the chance to recognise themselves as justified within this
history. At last the Jews would have the opportunity not to conceive
of themselves as the chosen ones of Satan, but to know themselves as
humans born in God to freedom. They would then know that man is only
free when he recognises his own kind as coequal helpmates of God and
as free persons.
5.
A
serious warning to Jewry
In
the fourth book of Moses, chapter 21, verse 2, it is claimed that
Israel
made a deal with Yahweh
when it was still a People without land. It is to have promised him
to kill all inhabitants of
Palestine
, if he gave this People
into their hands. This sheer unbelievable suggestion is attested in
the following words in the Old Testament:
And
Israel
vowed a vow unto the LORD, and said, If thou wilt deliver this
people into my hand, then I will utterly destroy
their cities.
It
is further attested that Yahweh agreed to this deal. In the fourth
book of Moses, chapter 21, verse 3 it says:
And
the LORD hearkened to the voice of
Israel
,
and delivered up the Canaanites; and they utterly destroyed them and
their cities.
This
is the expression of the self-conception of a nation of
executioners.
There
can be nothing in common with this spirit of antiquity. This spirit
must not be tolerated for it belongs to oriental antiquity, which
disappeared long ago. It is the absolute negation of the West and
its history. Only here, in the Occident is world history in truth
the progress of the spirit in the consciousness of freedom.
Here, under Christian influence, the spirit worked its way up to the
idea of the person and to the idea of the nation – to concepts
which are wholly alien to the Jews and which cannot be understood by
them. To demand tolerance towards Judaism is comparable to the
suggestion to permit the trade with Negro flesh on the meat market
of Soho because cannibalism still occurs in Africa to this day
due to religious grounds, and because it would be unjust towards the
Africans living in London to hinder them from celebrating their
religious rites.
The
millennium phenomenon of anti-Semitism is brought about by the
repudiation of the Chosen People’s bloodthirsty belief in bondage.
If
the Jews continue to destroy the world as Satan’s servants, they
will be exterminated like the Native Americans or Australian
Negroes. They will then themselves suffer the fate Yahweh has
planned for the other Peoples:
For
the indignation of the LORD is upon all nations, and his fury upon
all their armies: he hath utterly destroyed them, he hath delivered
them to the slaughter.
Their
slain also shall be cast out, and their stink shall come up out of
their carcasses, and the mountains shall be melted with their blood.
Is.
34:2-3
6.
How
to deal with the Jewish Question
The
decisive viewpoint for the treatment of the Jewish Question was not
presented by Adolf Hitler but by the Zionist Bernard Lazare, who
lived at the end of the 19th century in
Paris
. He writes:
If
the animosity and hostility towards the Jews had only existed in one
country and in a particular time, it would be easy to find out the
reasons for this anger. But on the contrary, this race has always
been the goal of the hatred of all nations, in whose midst the Jews
lived. Since the enemies of the Jews belonged to the various races,
which lived in areas far away from each other, had different laws,
were dominated by opposing ground rules, had neither the same
manners nor the same customs, and were animated with dissimilar
spirits, the general grounds for anti-Semitism must always have
existed in Israel itself, and not amongst those who struggle against
Judaism.
The
spirit of freedom rose in the West, where not some, or a few, but
where all are free, both the individual and his community.
Europe
has proven itself
superior to the folk-spirits of
Africa
,
Asia
and
America
in this. The world is
marked by the Peoples of Europe, and it will remain so.
The
higher spirit is in fact with itself, i.e. free, when it destroys
its lower forms by also exterminating them physically. The spirit
does not need to justify itself to anybody, for who could judge God?
The
higher occidental spirit of freedom is, however, for itself the
consciousness that the lower forms and shapes of itself are but
moments of itself which are to be negated as spirit in spirit, and
where the slaying of these results in the opposite. The more
abstract spirit is not slain by the more concrete and more free
spirit, but is sublated in the spiritual struggle in the threefold
sense: ended (negare), kept (conservare), uplifted (elevare). This
higher spirit which has grown out of Judaism appears in an undated
memorandum of Himmler for Hitler, probably from May 1940. In this
memo, the thought “of a physical extermination of a People” is
rejected due “to inner conviction and as being ungermanic and
impossible”. Hitler agreed with this point in a marginal note of
his own.
Concerning
the disposal of the residual shape of Yahweh, which exists in the
pores of the historic Peoples of the West, one needs to sensibly
choose between assimilation, expulsion, isolation in ghettos or
accommodation in reservations – eventually a combination of these
measures, if possible, in agreement with those affected. We here
need to credit the achievements of Satan, God’s servant,
in the struggle of the Peoples, for freedom as idea.
7.
The
secret of the survival of the Jews – or, the workshop of the
history of the Jewish spirit
Freedom
is only actual
in the opposition of its moments, the freedom of the individual and
the freedom of the People as a whole. Freedom exists only as idea
in the self-conscious reconciliation
of the opposites of the moments of freedom. This is the key thought
of Hegelian philosophy, which has life as philosophical-political
tract in the Deutsches Kolleg.
The
particular contrast between the particular and general has worked
itself out as the hostility between the Western powers (
Great Britain
and
France
) that are of a more
individualistic nature on the one hand, and the Central power (
Germany
) that is of a more
communal (militaristic)
nature on the other hand.
In
order to liberate the subjective spirits (individuals) from the
binding forces of the family, clan, tribe and nation to an extant
that they were legitimately able to exist as Persons
(individuation), the natural communities were weakened until they
were at death’s door, in a process of world history lasting a
millennium.
It
has shown itself as history that the force which binds communities
on the one hand spiritually corrupts (paralyses), and on the other
hand, that it has been overcome through the materialistic powers of
the market, which unbind this force.
Spiritual
corruption, the death of God,
is the work of the atheistic system of belief
which clothes itself in the raiment of the “scientific world
view”.
The
materialistic loosening of the bonds that bind families,
communities, etc., which only reaches its mature form in the
relationship of capital as the boundless drive to enrichment and
power, is mediated by gold, wherever gold has become the general
means of payment.
Both
powers – atheism and the market – are psychic forces of the
subjective spirit itself: Atheism is the result of the spiritual
drive to freedom, and economic materialism results from the drive
toward an abstract being-for-self (Fürsichsein).
As ways of living of the spirit, both are appearances of the moments
of its freedom, which, in their particularisation from the general,
are at first only abstract freedoms. For the sake of the
one-sidedness of their moments, freedom appears as the Angel of
Death. The beating of his wings creates the apocalyptic aura which
now awakens consciousness to the thought of freedom, in which
private arbitrariness is just as much sublated as is the despotism
of Leviathan.
We
of the modern age think far too highly of our tearing away from God.
We would do better to mark the writing on the wall as Friedrich
Nietzsche interpreted it for us:
The
greatest of the recent events – that ‘God is dead’, that faith
in the Christian God has become implausible – is beginning to cast
its first shadows over Europe ... This long abundance and series of
demolition, destruction, demise and overthrowing which is now ahead
of us: who could guess enough of this today to be the teacher and
prophet of this vast Logic of Terror, to be the prophet of a
darkening and blackening out of the sun, the likes of which the
world has probably never witnessed before?
The
powers of dissolution and corruption have their world historical
existence both inside the subjective spirit
– the side of potential enticement – as well as in an outer
protagonist, in Mephisto who enters the stage as a frivolous sceptic
and dastardly tempter.
This
is the role assigned to Judaism.
In
itself (i.e. as one which is not yet put forth and known) Judaism is
atheism, with the drive to become for itself, to put itself forth as
atheism and to know itself as such. Judaism’s principle is
grandeur, i.e. the separation of God and man.
The
grandeur of Yahweh is in itself atheism, since in this form and
shape God is not at once man: i.e. God here ends where man begins,
meaning that God has a limit in man and is therefore not infinite
but finite. The limit contained in this grandeur disparages Yahweh
to finiteness. Grandeur therefore bears its own contradiction which
destroys Yahweh.
And
it is the Jews themselves who are executing this judgement with the
incredible lie of their extermination through the German Reich. For
how can they continue to bear Yahweh as their God, who allowed all
of this to happen?
If one were to follow the arguments of the Rabbis Yoel Taitelbaum
and Ovadia Yosif,
who interpret the “Shoa” as Yahweh’s punishment for
disobedience, then one could hardly prevent oneself from making the
cynical inquiry of just how much remuneration the German Reich will
receiving for these services.
This
God enslaves his chosen People with an abundance of unnatural
commands.
The Jews revolt against this in two ways: The weaker choose the path
of getting round the laws by means of a highly developed art of
hair-splitting. The stronger amongst them get rid of this despot by
using the separation of God and man that is given in Judaism to deny
the existence of Yahweh without destroying themselves in the process
of doing so.
It
is thus no surprise to find Jews in the front row of the great
atheistic thinkers: Baruch Spinoza, Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud. But
atheism is only the death of God that has become for itself, that
has become conscious, and which was already present in itself in
Yahweh.
As
the conscious tearing away of man from God, atheism is God’s
adversary (Hebrew:= Satan). Peoples as thoughts of God (Herder), and
states as existence of God in the world (Hegel) perish in the death
of God. In no age has this connection appeared more miserably than
in our own. The Peoples sense that the suffering at the loss of God
is a Jewish disease, the spread of which is led by Marxism’s list
of sins, in particular its Bolshevistic form.
That
parasite of market economy, extortion, is similarly a form of Being
impressed upon the Jew through the Yahweh religion,
which, due to the fact that it is exaggerated through divine
promises, is the ladder to desperately desired world rule in Jewish
self-conception.
Karl
Marx, grandson of a Rabbi, may here serve as a witness for the fact
that the Jew has appropriated the power of money, that through the
Jew money has become the world power and the practical spirit of
Jewry has become the practical spirit of the Christian Peoples.
Atheism
and Mammonism are therefore two sides of the same coin, which have
their mutual roots in Yahweh. It is due to these sides of their
being that Jews are hated in all places by all Peoples.
As
the body of
Yahweh
,
Judah
is the existence of the
negativity of the concept.
This is the act of excluding everything from itself, the unending
reference onto oneself. As consciousness, this is the thought of
being chosen.
As
Being for Another, i.e. in reference to the Peoples,
Judah
is Satan
and not truly a People (Volk).
It is precisely this state of affairs which finds its expression in
the Torah, in that Yahweh is irate at all Peoples and announces that
he will give them all up to the slaughter.
This
passage of the Bible is helpful for overcoming the emotional
barriers that hinder a clear insight into Jewry as atheism, as death
of God.
A
People which lets itself be chosen by Satan to become the
executioner and slaughterer of the Peoples is itself Satanic. If it
is then massacred by the attacked Peoples, then it is no more a
victim than is the murderer whom the law executes. Only the higher
self-consciousness of the Peoples, that the Jew is a brother in God,
can stay the sword drawn for protection against robbers and
murderers.
Judah
, unable to set forth a
constitution out of itself when forced to fend for itself, would (as
a People that is self-enslaved)
long ago have perished at the hostility of the Peoples,
as victim of a truly committed genocide by the World Spirit in
antiquity. Its traces would have disappeared: either in the sand of
the desert into which stronger Peoples would have driven
Judah
, or in the biological
and cultural substance of those Peoples who absorbed Jews as
refugees.
After
Judaism had already existed amongst the other Peoples as a
corrupting influence before the destruction of the
Second
Temple
, the Jews’ existence
as a People with a physical location is finally terminated with the
destruction of the
Temple
and the scattering of
the Twelve Tribes of Judah and
Israel
which accompanied this
event. The unending, spaceless desire for a return to the Promised
Land has taken the place of the physical location as a moment that
concentrates the People on physical territory, and the pariah-like
sense of togetherness that is created out of the fear of persecution
has taken the place of the feeling of their own folk-community as
experienced in their own territory (land).
This
desire is not ever satisfied since the emigration of the Jews out of
Israel
did not leave an
emptiness behind, and because the return of the Jews to
Palestine
now hits upon the
resistance of a folk-spirit that is superior to the spirit of the
Jews. This superiority shows itself in the willingness of the
Palestinian Moslems to sacrifice their lives. This attitude is
wholly alien to the Jews, since for them the highest value is the
preservation of the life of each Jew. Due to this reason the
Zionists were fundamentally mistaken when they thought to keep hold
of the robbed land and to pacify the Palestinians with brute force.
The
Jews’ fear
is omnipresent – a fear to which corresponds a particular
protective mechanism: they cry before they have been struck.
The extermination, which is only feared, thus becomes an imagined
reality.
The Jew thus always and everywhere feels as a “survivor” with
the with the right to claim compensation for his danger.
Perhaps
this is the inwardly experienced justification of the Talmudic
teaching which permits the Jews to rob the Goyim.
After
a victorious WWII, the Jews have put themselves into an unassailable
position by means of the mendacious persecution claims of their
media. Each and every crime is forgiven them by publicised opinion
before it is even committed. Each moral protest against the staging
of their villainies before the eyes of the world, is successfully
lied into the crime of “anti-Semitism” by them.
The
fact that the Jew is needed because of his corruptive Being by the
Peoples, is something of which the Peoples have no consciousness.
The protection often given the Jews by the princes is not due to the
insight into their negativity, but due to the high esteem in which
their money and intellect is held.
The
Jewish spirit is an anti-Folk-Spirit that does not wish to truly
love: not his neighbour (for this love needs to be explicitly
commanded to him!) and not the soil that carries him. Without love
for people and soil, the territory in which he lives will never
become his home.
He thus lacks the strength to defend both people and soil. The
passions, which remain unemployed (there is no Jewish art!) harden
to the fanaticism of the bondage of Yahweh. Without power of
assertion, and lacking all pride, the Jew seeks protection and
accommodation amongst the Peoples that he hates. Both are granted
him – until revoked – out of the subconscious inner necessity to
have the workshop needed for his redemptive-historical work of
destruction where the Peoples that are to be treated are located.
This
– Talmudic – enemy differs from all other enemies imaginable.
His particularity was able to be felt
by the Peoples, but it was not recognised. Hegel points this
particularity out, however, without interpreting Talmudism as such:
The
Jews are victorious, but they did not fight; the Egyptians are
defeated, but not by their enemies; they succumb like one poisoned
or murdered in his sleep by an invisible attack ...
A
decisive moment of the corruption of the Peoples that is
redemptive-historically necessary is their guilelessness. Just as in
the tale of the Wolf and Seven Kids (cf. the fairytales of the
Brothers Grimm) Satan needs to gain access through pretence and
hypocrisy in order to accomplish his work. The attack itself must
remain invisible. This is the deep reason why they scream
“anti-Semitism!” as soon as one openly speaks out their name.
They cover their conspiracies up with the reproach that one is a
“conspiracy theorist” if one perceives their intrigues and calls
them by name.
Judah
is a community without a
physical location that is essentially an enemy (Satan)
who cannot be grasped, and who cannot be fought against with regular
methods due to his lack of location, which is why he is always
threatened by irregular extermination.
Under
these circumstances, there can be no lack of a life-maintaining
redemptive-historical counter-force.
The
fact that Judah is still alive and has not perished like the other
Peoples of antiquity, is not due to a will to save Judah, nor due to
an inclination of the European Peoples, but is due to the fact that
(as could be shown in the redemptive-historical context) the Peoples
needed Judah as a corruptive influence for the sake of their own
liberation.
8.
...
but now they will lose!
The
Jewish metal, gold, has been cursed as being an agent of moral
corruption at all times by all Peoples. The secret of the world-wide
active charisma (to this very day) of the leader of the Germans,
Adolf Hitler, lies in the hope of the Peoples to be redeemed from
the curse of gold and the stranglehold of the Jewish plutocrats
through him. Billions of people would be willing to forgive Hitler
and the Germans the genocide perpetrated against the Jews – if
this genocide had indeed been committed – simply because they
cannot imagine any other solution of the Jewish Question than the
murder of the Jews.
The
thought mentioned last is deeply enrooted in the collective
conscious of the Peoples – and the Jews are aware of this. Already
the Old Testament, the Bible of the Jews, reports the decision of
the Persian High King Artaxerxes to rid himself of the Jews through
murder. In an addition to the Book of Esther, in the Vulgate, we
read:
Seeing
then we understand that this people alone is continually in
opposition unto all men, differing in the strange manner of their
laws, and evil affected to our state, working all the mischief they
can that our kingdom may not be firmly established: Therefore have
we commanded, that all they that are signified in writing unto you
by Aman, who is ordained over the affairs, and is next unto us,
shall all, with their wives and children, be utterly destroyed by
the sword of their enemies, without all mercy and pity, the
fourteenth day of the twelfth month of Adar of this present year.
That they, who of old and now also are malicious, may in one day
with violence go into the grave, and so ever hereafter cause our
affairs to be well settled, and without trouble.
Johann
Gottlieb Fichte treats the problem of the creation of a state within
a state in his work “Beitrag zur Berichtigung der Urteile des
Publikums über die Französische Revolution” (Contribution
towards the correction of the public’s judgements on the French
Revolution) from 1793. He here deals with Judaism and the solution
of the Jewish Question.
Following
contract-theory, Fichte believes that a state within a state is
possible. He replies to the objections which point out the danger of
such a condition:
But
please, is it really necessary, is it at all likely that much harm
would come of it? You who fear the danger of such a condition so
much, have you never thought about your own situation, have you
never discovered that these dangers perpetually surround you
hundredfold? (Fichte,
Werke, vol. 6, p. 149)
At
this juncture he takes Judaism as an example:
A
mighty, hostile state is spreading through almost all European
countries, a state that is constantly at war with all other states
and that oppresses the citizens of some states awfully harshly: it
is Judaism.
(loc. cit., p. 149)
He
does not take the danger to be that the Jews will form a state
within a state. Rather, it is the fact that this state is founded on
the hatred for all Peoples which makes it dangerous.
Fichte
criticises the drivel about tolerance and refers to it as “words
sweet as sugar about tolerance, and human rights, and civil
rights” (p. 149-150).
At
this juncture he reminds his opponents that in a different context
it is they who always conjure up the danger of a state within the
state, in order to then take a swing at the emancipation endeavours:
that
the Jews who, even without you, are citizens of a state that is more
secure and stronger than all your states, would completely trample
your remaining citizens under their feet if you now also grant them
civil rights in your own states.
(p. 150)
History
shows how justified this warning was. Let a Jewish self-testimony as
well as a conversation between the former US President Richard Nixon
and the preacher Billy Graham serve as examples.
In
a keynote address, which the Jew Stuart E. Eizenstat,
US
Undersecretary of State
for Economic, Business and Agricultural Affairs gave before
graduates of the
Yeshiva
University
on
21 May 1998
, he spoke of the
remarkable
transition
of the Jews from the fringes to the centre of American life, with
full equality, and this again with Jews … at their centre.
He
then concludes with satisfaction (and certainly not with
anti-Semitic intent):
Making
up less than three percent of the population at the end of this
century, the level of Jewish participation in the leadership of the
areas of the arts, science, of business life, economics, politics
and the government of the
United
States
is quite simply astonishing.
If the people of Israel expresses real power for the first time
since the destruction of the Second Temple, a power which is
exercised by Jews, then Jews have a real influence in America, more
so than in other countries of the Diaspora, and they are using this
power in a constructive and positive way.
In
its edition from
06 March 2001
, the International
Herald Tribune printed a commentary of the Boston Globe. It states:
Thanks
to the most recent release of Nixon tapes,
America
now learns that Graham egged Nixon on. After Nixon decries what he
sees as the malevolent influence of Jews in
Hollywood
and the media, Graham says, “This stranglehold has got to be
broken or the country’s going down the drain.” Seconds later,
Graham says ominously, “If you get elected a second time, then we
might be able to do something.”
Without
having spoken it out, Fichte had posed the question how to deal with
the Jews. He answers this question in a footnote (21) as follows:
The
Jew who pushes through the solid, yea, insurmountable entrenchments
which lie before him to a general love for justice, for mankind and
for truth, is a hero and a saint. I know not whether suchlike ever
existed or do exist. I would like to believe it as soon as I see
them. But I will not let anybody sell me pretty semblance for
reality! – The Jews still do not wish to believe in Jesus Christ;
they do not even want to believe in a God at all, if they did not
have two distinct moral codes and believed in a God hostile towards
mankind. – They must have human rights, even though they do not
grant us the same; for they are humans, and their injustice does not
justify us to become like them. Never force a Jew against his will,
and suffer not that it happen if you are the nearest to hinder it;
you quite simply owe it to him. If you ate yesterday and feel hungry
today, and you only have bread to last for today, then give your
bread to the Jew if he did not eat yesterday, and you would do most
well to do so. – But to
grant them civil rights, for that I see no other way than to cut off
all their heads in one night, and to stick other heads on them in
which not a single Jewish idea is contained. I again see no other
way to protect us from them, than to conquer their promised land and
to send them all down there. … I do not want to say that one
ought to persecute the Jews for their faith, but that no one ought
to be persecuted for this reason. I know that one is rather
permitted to attack the whole body of mores and their most holy
product, our religion, before various learned tribunals, than that
one is allowed to attack the Jewish nation. … What I say, I hold
to be true; and I am saying it in this manner because I believe it
to be necessary: I add that I find the method of many of the more
recent authors in respect to the Jews to be very inconsequent, and
that I believe to have the right to say what and how I think. He who
dislikes what I have said should neither grumble, nor slander, nor
get worked up about it, but ought to refute the facts mentioned
above. (Fichte, Werke, vol. 6, p. 150)
Is
there anybody who could claim that the relationship to the Jews has
improved since then, and that the dangers mentioned by Fichte have
diminished?
We
have a problem with the Jews. Who could possibly doubt this after
all that has come to pass? Except: one is not allowed to speak about
it.
Problems
which are not allowed to be discussed cannot be solved – at least
not sensibly.
Serious
problems that are not solved are like a cancerous growth. They kill
the infected organism.
A
law that forbids the treatment of life threatening problems by
punishment, is not right (ius).
For right is the will to life of a community. The community lives
freely through right. Right unleashes its productive powers so that
the community can freely develop.
Whoever
commands a People not to unsettle the enemy that has invaded, and be
it only through publicising the presence of this enemy, is himself
an enemy of the People and deserves to be driven out.
The
German Reich will solve the Jewish Question. How it is to be solved
– that depends on the Jews.
Germany
is not the country of
the Jews, and it is not the country of the Turks.
Germany
is the country of the
Germans – and only of the Germans!
Germany
will again become
German!
Long live the Holy German Reich!
|
