----- Original Message -----

The German Reich is calling


Invitation to join the Society for the Rehabilitation of Those persecuted
for Refutation of the Holocaust


Dear compatriots and friends,

the General Uprising of the People to regain the German Reich's Ability to
act announces itself in the Uprising for the Truth which was begun on the
Wartburg on the 30th of July 2003. With the campaign for promoting the
resumption of the proceedings in favour of those persecuted due to
refutation of the Holocaust, this uprising is now driven forward. The
organiser of this campaign will be the rehabilitation society that will be
founded in the next days. Each person loyal to the Reich should now feel
called upon to join this society and to support its work to the best of his
ability.

The foundation declaration has the following wording:


Foundation Declaration of the Society for the Rehabilitation of Those persecuted for Refutation of the Holocaust

"All other things are forced; man is the only being which wills. But
precisely because of this, nothing is as shameful as having to suffer force,
for force quashes him. Whosoever uses force against us, does nothing less
than challenge our humanity; he who endures such due to cowardice, throws
his humanity away."
[Friedrich Schiller: Concerning the Sublime, cf. Schiller Werke, vol. 5, pp
792-93]

We, the signatories of the foundation declaration, attest that in all parts
of the world honest and upright people doubt the Holocaust, in the sense of
a systematic destruction of European Jewry by the government of the German
Reich. Many are convinced that there was no Holocaust. Their numbers are
increasing.

In May 2002, the editor-in-chief of the news magazine DER SPIEGEL, Fritjof
Meyer, published the essay "Die Zahl der Opfer von Auschwitz" [The Number of
Victims of Auschwitz] in the reputable magazine OSTEUROPA. Amongst others,
the responsibility of this publication was also borne by Prof. Dr. Rita
Süßmuth, the former president of the Bundestag, in her capacity as president
of the publishing committee of this magazine. Based on new findings in the
archives, Meyer advocates the theory in this essay that contrary to the
assertions of official historiography, no or only experimental gassings on a
small scale of humans took place in the mortuaries of the crematoria I and
II in the main camp of Auschwitz. "The actual genocide", writes Meyer,
"probably (!) took place predominantly in the two converted farm houses
outside (!) the camp" (loc. cit. p. 632). The conclusion drawn from his
study distances itself "not all too far" from the "recent level of research"
"with 510.000 dead, of which 356.000 were probably (!) murdered in the gas"
(Jews as well as non-Jews).

The publication and distribution of this article was subject of numerous
preliminary investigations by public prosecutors' offices against Fritjof
Meyer, against Prof. Dr. Rita Süßmuth and against the numerous citizens of
the Reich who had reported themselves, had distributed the essay and had
informed the investigating authorities. All proceedings which were pending
at the prosecutors' offices of the various Lands were terminated with the
reason that no offence had been committed against the prohibition of
Holocaust denial/trivialisation (§ 130 StGB [Penal Code]).

The signatories take this as an opportunity to demand the resumption of all
criminal proceedings which have led to sentences due to violation of § 130
StGB with the statement of reasons that the Holocaust is in the described
sense an "obvious fact" which does not need to be proven.

The "doctrine of obviousness", which is advocated by the Federal German
supreme court, has at the very latest collapsed with the Meyer article and
the practice of the investigating authorities to terminate the proceedings
which pertain to this. In analogous application of § 359 StPO [Code of
Criminal Procedure] these circumstances amount to compelling grounds for
resuming the proceedings. The courts now have the opportunity to put right a
grievous maldevelopment of the judicial system. The punishment of Holocaust
denial, as well as making the persecuted defenceless through the criminal
proceedings, by the courts of the Federal republic of Germany are an attack
against the spiritualness of the people living in its reach of sovereignty.
The spiritualness of a person is a condition of being, i.e. something which
can normatively neither be questioned nor formed. Rather, this is the reason
of the inner sense of all statements whose logic is determined by a "You
shall".

Whichever contents the spirit may receive through examples, teachings of
faith, tradition, education and upbringing in associating with his own kin:
these are all, without exception, merely the malleable material at which the
subjective spirit forms itself through its own spiritual work and carves
itself out toward conviction. It is only the conviction which has been
worked out by oneself which is this inner steadfastness, without which human
existence is a miserable there-being. This innermost being of the spirit is
only made true through its expression. Conviction is the light which is shed
upon everything in which the person is interested. It determines all
possible decisions of the person and is in itself actuality (the emphasis
being on the verb 'to act'). The suppression of the expression of a
conviction is forced hindrance of a dignified existence, for only in the
expression of his core being does man have dignity. A core being which does
not express itself is not actual. An expression which is not the expression
of an innermost being is undignified. The arrogance of being able to
determine that a certain conviction is not at all possible due to the
"obviousness of the contrary" - e.g. the conviction that the mass
extermination of Jews is a false claim - is the eternally futile attempt to
destroy the spirit. This attempt does not destroy the spirit, but those who
try to kill it.

The "Society for the Rehabilitation of Those persecuted for Refutation of
the Holocaust", which is herewith founded by the signatories, is to
eliminate the isolation of the persecuted which has dominated so far, is to
guarantee the necessary public awareness of their struggle for justice, and
is to provide the financial means for a successful judicial struggle.


The following rules of dues are planned:

Draft of a proposed decision

The foundation assembly is asked to decide the following rules of dues in
accordance with § 4 no. 1 a of the standing rules:

1. Up until further notice, the regular membership dues are Euros 10,--
per month.
2. For members who, according to the conscientious conviction of the
executive committee, were/are personally affected by measures of persecution
due to supposed denial or trivialisation of the Holocaust, reduced dues of
Euros 3,-- per month apply.

All members are requested to support the society in the execution of its
tasks beyond the payment of their membership dues, through donations,
relevant contributions and favours according to their possibilities.

Whoever wishes to be represented as a foundation member can do so through
the power of attorney which is appended to this letter. If so, the signed
power of attorney needs to be in my hands by the 7th of November at the
latest.

In loyalty to the Reich,
Horst Mahler

Draft of the Standing Rules for the

"Society for the Rehabilitation of Those persecuted for Refutation of the
Holocaust"
(VRBHV)


§ 1 Purpose, Name, Seat, Financial Year

(1) The society acts under the name "Verein zur Rehabilitierung der
wegen Bestreitens des Holocausts Verfolgten".
(2) Its purpose arises out of the foundation declaration from the 9th of
November 2003, which is part of the statutes and which is presented in the
appendix.
(3) It has its seat in Vlotho; the financial year is the calendar year.

§ 2 Acquisition and Loss of Membership

(1) Prerequisite for membership acquisition is an application for
membership directed at the executive committee, in which the applicant
obliges to comply with the standing rules. The executive committee decides
on the admission at its own discretion.
(2) Membership expires through death, written notice of resignation and
expulsion. A member can declare his resignation by means of a written notice
to the executive committee at any time. Expulsion is permissible if the
member has culpably and grievously infringed the interests of the society.
The general meeting decides on the expulsion.
(3) After termination of the membership, a member has no rights to the
society's assets.

§ 3 Executive Committee

(1) All business of the society is managed by the executive committee,
which is comprised of the chairperson, his deputy and the clerk. The society
is always presented by two members of the executive committee together.
Through decision, the executive committee can conduct individual business or
can authorise individual representation for certain areas of business. If
the chairperson is unable to attend, he is deputised by the deputy
chairperson, and if he too is unable to attend, by the clerk.
(2) The members of the executive committee are elected for a year at a
time by the full general meeting. The executive committee stays in office
until a new executive committee is elected. The re-election of a member of
the executive committee is permissible.
(3) The executive committee can justify obligations for the society only
in that the liability of the members is restricted to the assets of the
society. Accordingly, all contracts signed in the name of the society, or
any other declarations of obligation, are to include the stipulation that
the members of the society are only liable with the assets of the society
for resulting obligations.
(4) The offices of the executive committee are honorary posts and are
held on a voluntary basis. The executive committee can appoint a secretary.
The secretary can be vested with the power of attorney by the complete
executive committee to the extent to which he has been authorised - if
necessary to individual representation - by decision of the executive
committee (§ 3 sect. 1 sentence 2 of the standing rules).

§ 4 General Meeting

(1) The full general meeting of the society always takes place in
November of a calendar year. The period of citation is three weeks. The
period begins with the posting of the invitation connected with the
suggested agenda (postmark).
(2) In particular, the general meeting decides on:

a) fixing the membership dues,
b) electing and recalling members of the executive committee,
c) the expulsion of a member,
d) the dissolution of the society and the use of the society's assets.

(3) Extraordinary meetings are to be convened if at least every fourth
member - certainly not less than five members - requests this, the reasons
being given in writing with the details of the agenda that is to be worked
through. If the executive committee does not comply with the request within
2 weeks (postmark is decisive) since receiving the convention request, then
these members can convene the general meeting themselves. At least 15 days
and at the most 24 days must pass between the posting of the invitation and
the day of the extraordinary meeting. Section 1 sentence 3 is valid
accordingly.
(4) Insofar as the standing rules do not determine differently, the
majority of the members present decides in the decision making of the
general meetings.

§ 5 Dissolution of the Society

(1) A decision of the general meeting with a two thirds majority of the
members present is required for the dissolution of the society. The motion
for dissolution is to be announced in the invitation. If less than two
thirds of the members turn up, then the meeting is unable to decide on the
dissolution of the society. In this case, the general meeting can invite to
another meeting which is then definitely capable of deciding. At least 15
working days have to lie between the first and the following meeting.
(2) The general meeting decides to whom the assets are to go.


Draft of a proposed decision

The foundation assembly is asked to decide the following rules of dues in
accordance with § 4 no. 1 a of the standing rules:

3. Up until further notice, the regular membership dues are Euros 10,--
per month.
4. For members who, according to the conscientious conviction of the
executive committee, were/are personally affected by measures of persecution
due to supposed denial or trivialisation of the Holocaust, reduced dues of
Euros 3,-- per month apply.

All members are requested to support the society in the execution of its
tasks beyond the payment of their membership dues, through donations,
relevant contributions and favours according to their possibilities.

Vollmacht

Hiermit erteile ich dem Rechtsanwalt Horst Mahler, Weidenbusch 13, 14532 Kleinmachnow, [ Tel. 004933203 20460, Fax 004933203 21059] Vollmacht, mich bei der Gründung des nichtrechtsfähigen "Vereins zur Rehabilitierung der wegen Bestreitens des Holocausts Verfolgten" (VRBHV) zu vertreten.

Dem Gründungsakt wird der Satzungsentwurf und die Gründungserklärung zugrunde liegen, die mir in schriftlicher Form zur Kenntnis gegeben worden sind. Die Vollmacht befugt den Bevollmächtigten insbesondere, meinen Beitritt zu dem Verein zu erklären und über die Satzung zu beraten und zu beschließen.

Sie umfaßt auch die Wahrnehmung meiner Mitgliedschaftsrechte in der begründenden Mitgliederversammlung, die die Satzung beschließen, den Vereinsvorstand wählen und die Beitragsordnung setzen wird.

_________________________________________________________

Ort, Datum                                                                             Unterschrift

_____________________________________________________________________

Name:             

Vorname:          

Anschrift:          

PLZ:                 

Ort: