The  « Shoa » sherlockholmised

By R.Dommergue Polacco de Ménasce (A Jew who strongly takes issue with the totalitarian judeopathy)

1.       Do we know, in the course of History, of an ethnic group which would not rejoice when learning that, in a war ended fifty years before, it had suffered many less losses than it thought?  Would the discoverer of such good piece of news, not be rewarded, celebrated? Would he be overwhelmed with heavy fines, would he escape attempted murder, as such was the case with Professor Faurisson?  Do such reactions not belong to a heavy case of psychopathy?

2.       Have the live skeletons which can be seen in such films as “ Night and Fog” (by Alain Resnais), have anything to do with gassing? Are they not the result of famine in the camps because of the systematic bombing of German towns containing more than 100,000 people, “holocausting” hundreds of thousands of women and children who are never mentioned?

3.       Where would have been the 4 million Jews ( if we consider that 2 millions were killed in battlefields), when it is well known that one camp could not contain more than 60,000 thousand people, and that except in Auschwitz, there was no  zyclon  B gas-chambers?  ( there never was any proof of mass gasing with any other gas).

4.       Are the witnesses worth anything, when you know that torture was the way to squeeze out evidence. Such was the case of  Commandant Hoess whose ludicrous declaration has become a legend . What about the 100 witnesses of gassing in Dachau,  when it is official that there was no gas chamber in that camp?

5.       130 kilos of coal are necessary for the cremation of one dead body. We are told that the Germans cremated  1300 corpses a day. U.S.A aircraft took hundreds of pictures of Auschwitz, during the supposed period of the holocaust.  ( 1943-44). Why is there not a single gigantic heap of  the necessary coal? Why not a single black coil  of smoke?

6.       Why do radio, films, press, T.V., continue daily to inflict upon us the myth of the six-million-gas-chambers, in a never ending whining and moaning? Why is the Jewish  lobby chasing, 50 years after the end of the war, nonagenarians who attempted to rescue Germany from the iniquity of the Versailles treaty, from the rot of the Weimar Republic,  from the collapse of  German youth,  from the unemployment of 6 million people, who, back to work could  give bread to the 21,500,000 persons who were dependent on them?

7.       Why does the AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK, issue 43, page 666, inform us that in 1941, there were 3.300.000 Jews in occupied Europe?

8.       How is it possible that the gas chambers could be just near the crematoria, when any chemist will tell you that zyclon B is hyperflammable?

9.       Why are revisionist historians persecuted when they demonstrate the hoax of the Shoa?  A scientific dialogue, a court-ordered appraisal have been demanded since 1980 about a problem specifically arithmetic and technical. It would seal truth for ever. It would  definitively shut  the mouths. Such was the case for Katyn, thanks to the revisionist Gorbatchev.

10.    How could zyclon B gas 1000 people at one time, when it is well known that the USA gas chamber for one ( maximum 2) persons sentenced to death, are of an unheard of complexity and cost?  Why, at  the trial of the Degesh, which  fabricated the cyclon B, was it declared in 1949, that gassing in such conditions is impossible and unthinkable?

11.    Why did Leuchter, who was in charge of the maintenance of  the USA gas chambers, give the firm evidence that there was no gassing in Auschwitz? Why have Austrian and Polish reports confirmed the Leuchter report?  Why is the Rudolf report, which analyses all results, forbidden? Why are those who divulge the Rudolf report, heavily sentenced by the law. And yet   the slightest care of the quality and accuracy of the report  is not taken…

12.    Why was, for the first time in History, the doctor’s degree of Mr Roques, on the “ Gerstein report” cancelled? And still, this report was not accepted  at the Nuremberg trial! Besides, the well known historian, a socialist  minister, Alain Decaux, mentioned in the press that “ nobody could have access to the Gerstein report, without passing first through  the excellent thesis of Mr Roques”…Alain Decaux said: “I admired the skill  and perfection of a “chartist”[1] performed by M.Roques in his doctor’s degree on the Gerstein report”. ( in his book: “La guerre absolue” 1998)

13.    Why did Raymond Aron and François Furet at  a  Sorbonne seminar, ( to which no revisionist was invited), state that  there was not the slightest trace of a written or oral order for the extermination of the Jews?

14.    Why is it never spoken of the planning of the extermination of the Germans by sterilisation of German men,  as expressed in a book written by the Jew Kaufmann (“Germany must perish”), It is undoubtedly a small detail…

15.    Why could cyclon B, used by the Germans for hygiene since 1920, be used in the concentration camps  for other purposes than delousing  and protection against typhus? Why could large quantities of zyclon B  be found in camps where it is official that there never was any gassing ???

16.    Why do they harp on the “six-million-gas-chamber” and never on the 80 million Goyim exterminated in the USSR, by an entirely jewish political regime, the executioners of which bore the names of Kaganovitch, Yagoda, Frenkel, Firine, Jejoff, Ourenski, Rappaport, and fifty other Jews…?

17.    Why, during the Zundel trial in Canada, did the famous exterminationist Jews disgrace themselves by talking of “ poetic licence” in their holocaust assertions,  and never came back when summoned by the judges?

18.    Why the Fabius-Gayssot law ? ( the man of the contaminated blood and the Communist dragging along  200,000,000 corpses).

19.    Is it not the supreme proof of the fake? Is it not casting out the nines?  There is no need of stalino-Orwellian law «  to be put in prison because of one’s beliefs » ( thought crime of « 1984 ») as stated M. Toubon, before he became a minister of Justice in France, to set up truth.  This law is anticonstitutional, antidemocratic, against the rights of men. Any facts, proofs, pros and cons,  are what we need. Professor Faurisson besought for the granting of a forum with an unlimited number of contradictors: he never obtained it.  L’abbé  Pierre did ask for it : they pretended to grant it but refused it almost immediately.  The forum did take place on a T.V channel at Lugano. It was a complete success for the Revisionists and was broadcast twice. Nobody knows it as the media at the beck and call of the Jewish lobby, move their little finger only when authorised.

20.    Why is it that,  when a professor declares that the holocaust is an arithmetic and technical ineptitude, he is forthwith dismissed! This, for the first time in History,  sets up  the insane concept of religious historical dogma, which in case of non perennial worship, is doomed to be struck by the lightning of the inquisition of a secular state.

21.    Why did the EXPRESS,a  famous French newspaper, in January 1995, assert that the gas-chamber shown for decades in Auschwitz I, was reconstructed after the war, and that all that concerns it, is false?

22.    By the way, a corpse soaked in cyanide acid, with lungs full of this gas, does it not explode in a crematorium???!!!

23.    Why did the historian, Jacques Baynac (an antirevisionist) assert that there was no possibility whatsoever to prove the existence of gas-chambers? ( in articles of the “Nouveau quotidien de Lausanne” dated  3 and 4 september 1996).

24.    Who is a negationist: he who refuses to examine facts, evidence, experts reports,  or the one who takes all relevant facts in consideration? A NON-revisionist historian is anything you want except a historian! A historian is by definition “revisionist”.

25.    How is it that M.Roubeix, a chief  executive  for 20 years of the factory in Saint Avold, producing cyanid acid ( zyclon B) asserted categorically that all that  was said about the german gas chambers was pure humbug?

There was actually a holocaust of 60 million people in a war declared in 1933 by the Jews against Hitler.  Hitler had given bread to 6 million unemployed, he had rejected the dictatorship of the dollar and the Jewish totalitarianism which pollute man and the planet and  which is called “democracy” by semantic mystification.  Only two parties are left: the totalitarian judeopathy, exterminating man and the planet, and  Nationalism for the Goyim not yet cankered by  capitalisto-marxist Jewish influence.

How could it be possible that hundreds of civilian workers might have come in and out Auschwitz every day and never seen  the gas chambers or heard about them?

In “Marianne” Jean François Kahn, expresses anger at the bureaucrats of the Jewish World Congress, about the despoilment of Jewish property, which ended on the 3rd of March 1998 in Washington.  He writes: “They have reduced the Shoah to a financial  market. So the typical victim of Nazi barbarity, the archetype of the most frightful genocide of this time, is not the exploited worker in Krakow, the humble artisan of Lodz, the small civil servant of Kiev, the modest shopkeeper of la rue des Rosiers, or the unknown craftsman of Riga,  but the cosmopolitan billionaire who made his immense fortune prosper in Switzerland,  who collected Rembrandt and Rubens, slept on a heap of gold, signed here and there comfortable insurance policies, sent his children to the U.S.A in order that they should make a brilliant career.  This mighty lobby of American oligarchs is not ashamed of reducing the holocaust to a Shoa-business…[2] If Faurisson had written what J.F. Kahn wrote he would have had one more trial on his shoulders ! There is not the shadow of a doubt… There is not the slightest « freedom of expression » such as made compulsory in the famous « rights of men »…

[1] « L’école des Chartes » is a famous French school  where learned men study carefully ancient documents, texts and books .

[2] This journalist does not know, or pretends not to know the arithmetico-technical realities of the holocaust, but still, what he writes is exceptional and courageous…

Top of Page | Home Page

©-free 2003 Adelaide Institute