|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INSANITY FAIR By Geoff. Muirden. Held
Australian League of Rights Ladies
and Gentlemen, this talk is entitled “Where to from here? Do
not adjust your mind. The fault is in reality.
As we look at what's happening in the world, we may be forgiven for
assuming that lunatics have taken possession of the asylum. A man called
Vernon Howard wrote a booklet called “The Lunatic Asylum Society” and
he said, “it’s not as bad as you think, it’s worse.” It's a
world in which the lessons of history have been thrown in the trash can
and the legacy of Western civilization seems to be fading into oblivion.
As if this were not bad enough, the white man seems to be assisting those
who want to destroy him, by cooperating in his own destruction. It is
getting to the stage where whites will be expected to dig their own
graves, lie down and very kindly shovel the dirt on top of themselves.
Needless to say, as a civil libertarian, a central concern is the way in
which civil liberties, a proud heritage of Western civilization, are now
being cast aside, and items such as Magna Charta, the English Bill of
Rights, the Declaration of Independence, and the US and Australian
Constitutions are museum pieces. And this is madness. To have a legacy of
freedom for which people fought and died for centuries ago and to throw it
into the trash can with the assistance of our so-called
“representatives” in a so-called “democracy” is insanity. And this
is partly a legacy of the way in which the world is being structured
towards totalitarian control. Doesn’t
it occur to anyone that war is the supreme act of “terrorism” and that
those who want to save us from terrorism recommend war to “end it”?
And isn’t it “terrorist” to use such methods as depleted uranium
that will threaten not only opponents but even An
indication of the way things could have been, but weren’t, is conveyed
in Dr Helen Caldicott’s book, “The New Nuclear Danger: George W.
Bush’s Military- Industrial Complex”, the chapter headed: “The
Tragedy of Wasted Opportunities.” Dr
Caldicott creates a fantasy world. She says: “Imagine this: The Cold War
is over. A wise and visionary American President, elected in 1992, decides
that now is the time to rid the world of nuclear weapons. Six months into
his first term he flies to “American
tax dollars are diverted from massive Pentagon and corporate military
budgets into projects designed to take care of the nation’s people. A
government-funded system of universal health care is instituted, and free,
state-of-the-art education from kindergarten through college gradually
becomes available throughout the nation. Congress passes a law mandating
that all cars be built to operate at 80 miles per gallon and appropriate
funding for public transportation operates in every state. Legislation is
enacted requiring that most buildings be retrofitted to collect solar
energy, and that every new building be powered, heated, and cooled by
solar energy. Generous safety nets are put into place, providing for the
old, the poor, the sick, and the indigent, and the Social Security system
remains immune to the work of “market forces”. Every American child
will be immunized, and no child will live below the poverty line. “Almost
five decades since the dawn of the atomic age, the “Now
blink and enter reality.” Of
course, that is pure fantasy. If swords had been turned into ploughshares,
and efforts made to phase out all nuclear weapons, civil liberties would
be more secure. But in a time of wars and rumours of wars freedoms are
under attack in a blatant way and are in process of being phased out. Truth
is the first casualty of war. One aspect of these lies being the furore
over the lies told about weapons of mass destruction, which constitute
weapons of mass deception. What
is worse, warnings have been extant for decades. George Orwell's
"1984" was a record of what was to come, even
if Orwell did not foresee the Internet as a weapon of mass
instruction and the way it
preserved free speech on a global scale. But much of what he spoke of is
now in place and what is not there already is in the works. War, or
preparation for war, seems to be a preoccupation of the Warnings
of the decay of our civilization have been forthcoming from a variety of
sources, including the League itself, individuals such as Peter Sawyer,
patriotic newspapers such as "Strategy", Tony Pitt's
"National Interest", Christian newspapers such as "It's
Time" and on the Net many and varied sources, such as Neil Baird's
Newsletter, the American Free Press, National Vanguard, etc., to name but
a few. Maybe these have slowed down the rush to destruction, but they
haven't stopped it. What I call "Muirden's Law" comes into play.
"Muirden's Law" says that in politics, you're either a cynic, or
you don't understand the real situation. It’s
a little like something Eric Butler mentioned. He talked about the
Gadarene swine rushing to jump over a cliff, and he imagined a solitary
pig stopping to ask himself, “is this a wise policy? Maybe we should
stop and reflect on it.” He tried to stop other pigs, but few heeded it.
This is an analogy of our present society, headed for destruction with
only a few voices raised against it. We should also advise others not to
commit suicide. (Many
and varied have been happenings in politics that show shown destructive
tendencies. We have seen, for example, the former Governor-General, Peter
Hollingsworth, hounded out of power by a media campaign to unseat him. His
years of service to the poor and needy have been ignored. He was accused
of having raped a woman over 20 years previously. Not only was it
inherently unlikely that a man of his character would do this, but also
the Archdiocese of Bendigo, where this incident allegedly occurred,
affirmed that he was not present at the camp where this allegedly took
place. The woman who made the accusation died before the case came to
court and was thus not available for cross- examination. Nevertheless,
Hollingsworth offered to stand down until an investigation took place. His
accusers did not proceed with the charge. Nevertheless, Hollingsworth
decided that the office of Governor-General had been sufficiently
blackened for him to retire. The media demand for him to resign did not
stop until he officially resigned. One
of the issues people of the past had fought for, and which is less and
less observed now, is "innocent until proven guilty." This was
not applied in his case and he was a victim of media harassment. The media
found him guilty and treated him as such. Which indicates that the media
have a share of blame in promoting these destructive tendencies. The
growing interest of Little Johnny in military matters may be shown in the
way he chose the Very Model of a modern Major-General, Michael Jeffreys,
as the new Governor-General. But
an article in April-May 2003 "Strategy" maintains that
the office of Governor-General it itself a "con" in that it
keeps the illusion that the office of Governor-General represents the
Queen of Australia in an executive position. The article says, and seems
to be correct, that the title "Queen of Australia" is just a
figurehead title, and not the statement of any constitutional reality. In
1973, the Royal Styles and Titles Act passed by the Australian federal
parliament and signed by the Queen, removed the status of Queen of the In
1975 on dismissal of the Whitlam government by Governor-General Sir
William Kerr, Speaker Scholes sought direction from the Queen. The reply
confirms she no longer has power in In
1984 Letters Patent were issued for the appointment of Governor-General by
the Queen of Australia. Under the Constitution, the Queen of Australia has
no executive power or legal position since the Queen of Australia has no
legal position in If
people want to revere the Queen as a surviving symbol of our
Anglo-Saxon-Celtic heritage, which in effect people such as Nigel Jackson
do, they can do so, (nothing personal against Nige) but the powerlessness
of the Queen means among other things, that those who petition the Queen
for redress of grievances, under the impression that she, or her so-called
representative in Australia, the Governor-General, are wasting their time
and preserving a legal fiction. In effect, we seem to be living in a de
facto republic. This is but another example of how institutions supposedly
set up to preserve liberty are only a mockery and a sham. "Muirden's
Law" is vindicated again. The
British monarchy is itself under threat. In the UK Mail, dated It’s
an amazing example of Doublethink. It announces that it will ensure the
survival of the monarchy yet its provisions would destroy it. One key item
is that it wants to sever the link between the monarchy and the Church of
England created under Henry VIII in 1532. If such a suggestion had been
made to Henry VIII, he would have sent them all to the block, but maybe
the present legislators think they can get away with it. They
announce that “the monarch should have the same freedom of religion as
the rest of us,” so they want to ensure that the monarch can be of any
religion, such as Buddhist, Islam, etc. And abandon the C of E. Her role
as “Defender of the Faith”, a legacy of the Reformation, is discarded,
and she becomes defender of any faith. They
recommend that the right of the monarchy to decide who their sons and
daughters can marry is to be removed, male primogeniture, which gives
priority of succession to a male heir, is to be scrapped. The monarchy
should have no right to dissolve or summon Parliament, their Royal Assent
over Parliament is to be revoked and their right to choose a Prime
Minister in the event of a hung Parliament is to be revoked. As well, they
want to demand that the queen pay a 40% inheritance tax. The outcome of
all this is of course to make the monarchy impotent and useless as no
doubt intended and to abolish any remaining power the queen might have to
help her subjects, as part of a race to a One World disorder. A sign of
the times.) As
a civil libertarian, a major concern is the way in which 9/11 has been
used to stifle liberties and justify war. Evidence
has come to light that not only 9/11 but also the invasion of Afghanistan,
Iraq and in future maybe Iran, Syria and others was planned years before
the event. In
a book published in 1997,titled "The Grand Chessboard",
Zbigniew Brzezinski , details the geopolitical strategy of the Why
am I inclined to give credence to this book? Because of the author's
qualifications. They
include Counsellor, Center for Strategic and International Studies;
Professor of American Foreign Policy, Johns Hopkins University; National
Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter (1977-81); Trustee and founder
of the Trilateral Commission; International Advisor of several major
US/Global Corporations; Associate of Henry Kissinger; under Ronald Reagan,
member of NSC-Defence Department Commission of Integrated Long-Term
Strategy; Past member, Board of Directors, The Council on Foreign
Relations; 1988- Co-Chairman of the Bush National Security Advisory Task
Force. He is also a past attendee and presenter at conferences of the
Bilderberger Group, which has meetings attended by the wealthiest and most
powerful families and corporations on the planet. All
that adds up to a lot of influence over the policies of the Bush and
previous His
central theme is that the His
statement is corroborated by Dr Johannes B. Koeppl, Ph.D., a former German
Defence Ministry official and advisor to former NATO Secretary General
Manfred Werner. He told FTW (From The Wilderness) "the interests
behind the Bush Administration, such as the CFR, the Trilateral
Commission, founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller- and the
Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and are now moving to implement open
world dictatorship. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are
fighting against citizens." This
statement sums up the real purpose of the alleged anti-terrorist drive. Vice
President Dick Cheney said that the so-called war against terrorism
"may not end in our lifetimes." What that means is it will not
end until all armed groups, anywhere in the world, which possess the
political, economic or military ability to resist the imposition of this
dictatorship, have been destroyed. These
are the so-called "terrorists" the globalists will fight over
the world. In
"The Grand Chessboard", Brzezinski describes He
notes that any nation that becomes predominant in He
says: "the defeat and collapse of the "But
in the meantime", he adds, "it is imperative that no Eurasian
challenger emerges, capable of dominating "For
" "How
"It
is also a fact", he says, "that "To
put it in a terminology that harkens back to the more brutal age of
ancient empires, the three grand imperatives or imperial geostrategy are
to prevent collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals,
to keep tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians from
coming together." (p.40) "Henceforth,
the United States may have to determine how to cope with regional
coalitions that seek to push America out of Eurasia, thereby threatening
America's status as a global power" (p. 55) “Uzbekistan,
nationally the most vital and the most populous of the central Asian
states, represents the major obstacle to any renewed Russian control over
the region...but the Eurasian Balkans are infinitely more important as a
potential economic prize: an enormous concentration of natural gas and oil
reserves is located in the region, in addition to important minerals,
including gold." (p.124) "The
momentum of " "Once
pipelines to the area have been developed, "For
" "It
follows that "
He
comes back to the suggestion that "without sustained and directed
American involvement, before long the forces of global disorder could come
to dominate the world scene." (p. 194) This
rhetoric reminds me of the comment of To
get back to Brzezinski, he continues: "With warning signs on the
horizon across "The
most immediate task is to make certain that no state or combination of
states gains the capacity to expel the "In
the long run, global politics are bound to become increasingly uncongenial
to the concentration of hegemonic power in the hands of a single state.
Hence, So
there's an element of "gather ye rosebuds while ye may" about it
for him. Now is the chance for the Brzezinki's
book is a clear and unambiguous statement of what the His
book shows evidence of some of the dangerous madness in the 21st century,
although planned back in the 20th century. It assumes that Might is Right,
that I
think he was right and that the US, Despite
the alleged connection of an al-Queda network behind 9/11, evidence is
accruing to suggest that it was conducted by forces within the The
way in which the truth is being concealed about 9/11 is the article in American
Free Press, July 21,2003, p. 3, which states that the investigation of
the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United
States, is being hampered by a lack of co operation from US intelligence,
and government sources, including the Pentagon and Justice Department,
which refuse to release important documents and insist that “minders”
are at hearings to intimidate witnesses.
The
pattern of events since 9/11 suggests
that the real aim in invading The
same pattern existed as that following the fire in the Reichstag which
Adolf Hitler used as a basis for the Enabling Acts that suppressed
personal freedom in the name of security for the citizen. The use of a
crisis to generate war is also shown in the way Franklin Delano Roosevelt
knew in advance of the planned attack on The
events of 9/11 were used as a pretext to justify draconian anti-terrorist
legislation whereby to "save" us from terrorism, we had to
create a state which itself became a terrorist exerting dictatorial
control, a major example, of doublethink. The US Patriot Acts in effect
abolished the US Constitution and US Bill of Rights. The
Department of Homeland Security has created a situation where This
is time when the proud history of freedom that inspired the American
Founding Fathers is being thrown in the trash can. I would suggest that it
is pure insanity to throw aside with contempt what men and women fought
and died for during the American Revolution and establish a tyranny far
worse than that of the redcoats. Another sign of Insanity Fair. The
American Founding Fathers did not believe for a minute that sacrificing
freedom for supposed security was worth it. Benjamin Franklin said:
"they that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." What
is being implemented in the George
Washington also knew the dangers of State powers. He said:
"government is not reason. It is not eloquence. It is a force, like
fire; a dangerous servant and a terrible master." And
John Adams understood the way in which moral and religious decline
prepared the way for tyranny, as it has in the Another
sign of tyranny is the imposition of military tribunals in If
the accused hires a civilian lawyer, the attorney has to have a security
clearance, work for no pay, have all conversations monitored, and abide by
a gag order about what happened there. They won't see all the evidence
against their client. Only the judge, jury and executioner will. The way
in which it works has been demonstrated by the sentencing of David Hicks,
an Australian citizen who will not be released to Once
convicted, there will be no appeal. As for "innocent until proven
guilty", forget it! As
if all that were not enough, consider this. In 2000 the US Army War
College report said that in 25 years we will have a hive mind, that the
Pentagon will oversee insertion of public information into a control grid.
We will be wired into a government mind-control Brainiac computer. This
is a kind of matrix built by the Pentagon. The embryonic LifeLog programme
would dump everything an individual does into a giant database; every
email sent or received, every picture taken, every Web page surfed, every
phone call made, every TV show watched, every magazine read- all monitored
and filed away. Ref:
DARPA's Dreams, HYPERLINK http://www.wired.com/ But
let's not forget that a dossier on these spies is also being kept in
Heaven, where the spies will be liable for punishment. Behind all these
military and civilian tribunals, there is the highest tribunal, the
Supreme Court of Heaven, that will judge them in the end. In the meantime,
the move towards suppression of civil liberties continues. Amnesty
International's 2002 report was aware of the insanity of using these
methods to create peace and safety. The 2002 report says: "far from
making the world a safer place, (the war) has made it more dangerous by
curtailing human rights, undermining the rule of international law and
shielding government from scrutiny. It has deepened divisions among people
of different faiths and origins, sowing the seeds for more conflict." Why?
Because war, which is the ultimate act of terrorism, makes more war
because those who are attacked swear vengeance, whether it is a guerrilla
war such as exists now in Security
must protect people as well as states. That means a commitment to human
rights. In
1977, Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was formed, led by
Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, James Woolsey, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard
Perle, Bill Kristol etc., most of them Zionist figures. They agreed to a
central role for the The
plan was for PNAC to gain control of the Bush administration, which proved
easier after 9/11. PNAC was behind the National Security Strategy
promulgated by the Bush administration in 2002 which assumed world
hegemony for the Mere
hours after 9/11 Secretary of Defence Rumsfeld ordered an attack on Iraq,
even though intelligence officials told him it was an al-Queda attack and
there was no connection between Iraq and the attackers.
Nonetheless, this lie of an Iraq-Al Queda connection was mentioned as a
pretext for invasion. This is a weapon of mass deception that is coming
more to light in the One
of the main excuses for invading Nevertheless,
we were told that Saddam Hussein was a crazed dictator and we must take
WMD away from him.He would indeed have to be a crazy dictator if he wanted
to attack the US, the strongest military force on earth, but there is no
hard evidence that he did. However, US, This
is more madness. Since the invasion of The
fault may not lie with the intelligence services as much as the abuse of
their reports by government sources in One
serious event here was the alleged suicide, or possibly murder, of an
intelligence whistleblower, David Kelley, on or about 17th
July, 2003,who revealed to the BCC ways in which UK Prime Minister, Tony
Blair, doctored intelligence claims about the Iraq war. Some
of the tensions and madness within Tensions
and conflicts within the intelligence community can have serious
consequences. On Warren
Reed, a former intelligence officer said there is a massive groundswell of
opinion in the federal intelligence bureaucracy that intelligence is
either ignored or used selectively to prop up policy decisions. "The
politicisation of advice to governments" says Reed," was
exacerbated under Keating's presidential regime and has been taken to
dangerous levels by the Howard government." Warren
Reed says: "the syndrome of politicising intelligence is so bad, so
insidious, so far-reaching in "Anybody
who rocks the boat by simply being honest in the nation's interest will
suffer through bastardisation and intimidation unless they toe the line. A
classical example is the tragedy of the Merv Jenkins suicide, which is
said to be one of the worst cases of bastardisation we've ever seen." Merv
Jenkins was put under such pressure he chose to suicide. But Muirden's Law
says that the suicide most likely will do nothing to change government
policy. Jenkins was evidently a sensitive individual and the world is now
geared for tough characters who have as much sensitivity as a ten-ton
truck. Incidentally, if anyone wants an understanding of how the sensitive
individual thinks, they should read Elaine Aron's "The Highly
Sensitive Person" According
to a paper, "Silent Witness",
written by Des Ball and published in One
way in which intelligence information can be concealed is shown by the way
in which they were told, ahead of the time, of the role of the Indonesian
army, the TNI, behind massacres in In
September, 2000, as the Olympic Games got underway, Australian Federal
Police raided homes in These
kind of concerns have been heightened now that the oppressive ASIO bill
passed Parliament in June, 2003. ASIO will now have more powers than
police but with less oversight. Simeon
Beckett, a spokesman for Australian Lawyers for Human Rights, suggests
that if a journalist were to write a story about terrorist organizations
and ASIO didn't have the information it could
under the ASIO laws, issue a warrant seeking his arrest. He then
has the choice of either breaking his ethics of silence concerning sources
for the story or face five years in jail. Under the legislation, he can be
detained for seven days and, if new evidence is produced or manufactured,
can be held for another seven days. This process can continue
indefinitely. It's
not necessary for ASIO to suggest that they have committed a terrorist
offence. It is enough that they have information about a terrorist offence
or organization, a power even police do not have when questioning a
suspect for suspected murder. Although
ASIO is given greater powers than the police, it will be subject to less
accountability. Complaints can only be made to the Inspector-General of
Intelligence and Security. Maybe
in future the ASIO law will ban revelations
such as those of Douglas
Wilkie, a defence analyst for the ONA (Office of National Assessment) who
published an article dated According
to Wilkie, the Iraqi military was "weak" and its "weapons
of mass destruction disjointed and contained." Moreover the argument
that Saddam Hussein had to be removed before he passed on WMD to
terrorists was flawed because there is no hard evidence of active co
operation between The
problem with producing so many lies is a lack of faith in the
pronouncements of Allied authorities. I.F. Stone, a political commentator,
said "all governments are liars. Nothing they say should be
believed." Amen. As
for an alleged dedication to democracy and its blessings, why is there no
mention of the way the US supported Saddam Hussein's dictatorship in the
1980s when Iraq was "the enemy of our enemy" (thus our friend).
The Reagan administration assisted But
that was back in the 1980s. Has there been a change since then towards
greater democracy? No, certainly not. The The
And,
of course, especially since 9/11 the imposition of totalitarian
legislation such as the Patriot Act has made it a sick travesty to speak
of the A
book published in 2003 by a Chinese writer, Amy Chua, titled "World
on Fire" does a worldwide survey to show that exporting free market
democracy breeds ethnic hatred and global instability,. Whereby the market
dominance of a minority generates hatred of their domination by the
majority. The It
looks as if the invasion of So
we have a whole bundle of insanity fairs here: the use of the supreme
example of terrorist force, which is war, as a so-called defence against
"terrorism". The pretext of shunning weapons of mass destruction
when armed to the teeth yourself, then invading and finding none of these
weapons. Cuddling up to dictatorships and creating a dictatorship while at
the same time announcing the export of democracy to the What
seem to be two motives for invasion stand out: the drive for oil and the
need to create a global Empire. It's
been argued that the invasion of The
policy known as the Carter Doctrine developed by Pres. Carter in 1980 was
to protect the flow of oil by any means necessary, including military
force. Whoever controls the flow of oil has a lever of power against rival
forces. Saddam used the euro as a means of currency for sale of oil before
the invasion. It suits the At
the same time, pressure was put on the To
keep this kind of military control going, civil liberties must be
suppressed, and so they are suppressed. One of the ways they are
suppressed is demonstrated in Plato's Republic, part of the inspiration
for the neo-con or chickenhawk conservatives. In Plato's Republic there is
a character called Thrasymachus, who cuts into a conversation by Socrates,
who wants to know what constitutes "justice". Thrasymachus says
that "justice is the will of the stronger". What
does Thrasymachus mean, that "justice is the will of the
stronger?" He means that certain people in society, an elite, have
political power and they impose their view of justice on society in
general. Plato
didn't like this definition, but it seems Thrasymachus was right. We see
it today, with influential interests imposing such Communist agendas as
"anti-racism", "anti-sexism" etc. on society, not on
the basis of their proven accuracy, but simply because they have the power
to proclaim it and enforce it, gaining control and suppressing civil
liberties, especially freedom of discussion. (as demonstrated in the
suppression of David Irving's video)As the totalitarian control is
enhanced, this "will of the stronger" is likely to be dominant,
more so than now, and dissent will be rendered difficult. This is the
future we are moving into. Little
Johnny is clearly in bed with the And
the agency behind much of this is war. I believe Major General Smedley
Butler, USMC retired, was right when he said, "War is just a racket.
A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it
seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it
is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense
of the masses." The
remedies suggested for the madness which throws into the gutter a proud
legacy of safeguards against
an abuse of freedom. These
include an appeal to the UN, and its list of human rights, overlooking the
fact that the UN allows exceptions to its list of human rights, except
where banned by law, and of course, these rights are banned by law is most
countries. The UN itself is totalitarian and anti-democratic, devised by
Communist instrumentalities. The
other is pressure for a Bill of Rights, choosing to overlook the fact that
if the government chooses not to abide by the Bill of Rights, they are
useless and empty words. A Bill of Rights existed in the Russian
Constitution under Stalin which supposedly guaranteed basic freedoms and
all were swept aside under the Stalinist dictatorship. Part
of what we need is what Eric Butler called "the wisdom of the
unlettered man." Joe
Sobran once mentioned an example of this in an article where C.S. Lewis
once overheard some soldiers conversing during wartime. He was startled to
discover that they all casually assumed their government
was lying. They weren't the least bit outraged by it; they simply
took for granted that this is what governments do. It was putting their
lives at stake, yet they didn't trust it to tell the truth. Lewis was
shocked that they weren't shocked." It
was not that C.S.Lewis was an idiot. He was an intelligent man. Yet these
unlettered men showed greater wisdom and understanding in their realistic
cynicism, which endorses Muirden's Law. When
it comes to secular tactics for dealing with the present situation, I
believe Thomas L. Fielder’s book, Candle of Light (which is worth
purchasing) has many useful insights. He documents the descent into
barbarism we are experiencing now, and suggests some remedies. He points
out that it cannot be remedied from the top down, but only from the
grassroots level. He mentions that people are not moved by information but
by events powerful enough to make them change. He recommends organizing
into small groups promoting important initiatives, especially Social
Credit, since he sees the monetary system as a vital reason for our
decline and sees the urgency of reform. He points out that it is good to
form an active group to approach politicians, especially those vulnerable
ones in marginal seats who are
in danger of losing their seat at the next election, and thus missing out
on the hearty pension and other goodies enjoyed by politicians. Recent
articles in “The Australian” have suggested that Jewish groups
are unhappy with the ALP, and it’s implied may have been behind the push
for Mr Beastly to take over as leader from Frank Crean. The Jewish groups
have threatened to cut off or reduce funding to the ALP. This could
increase the vulnerability of the ALP and make an approach by patriots who
threaten not to vote for marginal incumbents very effective. Another
move has been the suggestion by one writer, Bazza Thomson, who urges
financial assistance to activist patriots by recommending that many people
subscribe into a central fund where money can be pooled and use to finance
spokesmen. It’s a great idea, and if it is implemented, he should have a
leading role in organizing it and getting assistance from it. Grassroots
can play a part in opposing tyranny. In the These
are some secular remedies. But
what is the underlying reason for
the descent to barbarism ? It’s a spiritual problem with a
spiritual solution. It comes because we have rejected God. As William Penn
said "if men are not ruled by God, they will be ruled by
tyrants." We are not being ruled by God, so we are being ruled by
tyrants. Man’s law inevitably leads to tyranny. The systems devised by
men lead to oppression because man is trying to become God, but without
God’s wisdom. And those doing it fail to accept the reality of universal
sin. That “there is none righteous, not one.” Instead, they try and
impose a mask of righteousness to try and hide their oppression. As
part of doing so, they try and suppress free speech, as part of a decline
into barbarism. But, as Charles Bradlaugh said, “without free speech, no
search for truth is possible; without free speech, no discovery of truth
is useful, without free speech, progress is checked, and the Nations no
longer march forward, toward the nobler life which the future holds for
man. Better a thousand fold abuse of free speech, than denial of free
speech. The abuse dies in a day, but the denial slays the life of the
people, and entombs the hope of the (human) race.” Free speech is an
attempt to find the truth that makes us free, so it is not surprising that
those who uses lies to enslave us oppose the truth. In spite of that,
there are politically incorrect magazines and the Internet as weapons of
mass instruction. Another
factor is set out by writer, Chalmers Johnson, in his book, “Blowback”,
a term invented by the CIA to explain unintended consequences of
intervention in foreign countries. It’s merely another term for reaping
what you sow. The Bible says that “God is not mocked, for whatsoever a
man sows, that shall he also reap.” That rule applies to nations, too,
who reap disastrous consequences from foreign illegal intervention.
Johnson sets out many examples of the way the The existing Christian churches are no more than agencies for political correctness. We need a national repentance to call on God for help and to call for vengeance from heaven against those who oppress us. If we do not, the present drive towards insanity and tyranny will continue. The world will continue to decline towards insanity, as usual, but the Christian can be in the world, but not of it, so he maintains a certain detachment towards it, rather like a visitor to the zoo, who impartially watches two tigers ripping each other apart. We are the observers, who will watch the world tearing itself apart. We can do little to stop it, but we can rise above it spiritually. We will have to relate to God individually and call on Him to assist us individually but the society as a whole is likely to decline unless it accepts the reality that we can only rely on God as the source of our salvation. Thank
you, ladies and gentlemen. |
