|
|
Peter Wakefield Sault's telling comment on Robert Fisk
My life's work is concerned with
demonstrating that a large body of scientific knowledge pre-dated the
'dawn of history' (circa 4000BC).
Please read Chapter 2 of my
book which is online at http://www.odeion.org/atlantis/chapter-2.html
I have upset the assyriological
establishment just a little, not because I can show that I'm right but
because the name 'Atlantis' occurs in the title of my work.
They are, however, using that as
an excuse to ignore the actual content.
It's a bit like claiming
that the 'Protocols' is a forgery in order to avoid discussion of
the contents.
As for Fisk - why doesn't he make
the same noises when he sees a Bible for sale?
Unlike the 'Protocols' the entire
Old Testament is a proven forgery created by some Babylonian Jew by
the name of Ezra.
Please feel free to comment on
matters raised above.
Peter Wakefield Sault
NB: I have people writing to me now thinking that it is my work and research that leads to this conclusion and I am having to put them right and refer them to Peter Myers' webpage
http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/bible.html
on the subject that provides further details, for example he precises Richard Elliot Friedman Who Wrote The Bible, pub. Jonathan Cape 1988, which summarizes the work done on the subject by scholars since 1711. I do not have a copy of this book. It is available through Amazon at
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0060630353/qid=1070738901/sr= 1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-2861815-8093602?v=glance&s=books
There is another book on the same subject, some of which can be read at http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1570718423/ref=sib_dp_pt/002-2861815-8093602#reader-page
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert
H. Countess
To: Fred
Toben
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 2:45 AM
Subject: Re: Robert Fisk's personal blind spot and the
alleged forged Protocols
Dear Peter Wakefield:
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter
Wakefield Sault
To: Robert
Countess
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 3:44 AM
Subject: Re: Robert Fisk's personal blind spot and the
alleged forged Protocols
Dear Dr Countess
Thankyou for your comments, which
are well-taken.
I have rather naively made that
judgment based upon the extracts from 'Who Wrote The Bible' by
Richard Elliot Friedman available on Peter Myers' website at http://users.cyberone.com.au/myers/bible.html
My purpose was to present a contrast
to the claim that the 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion'
is a forgery.
That the Old Testament starts off
with a set of contrived falsities, not to say bare-faced lies,
is plain to see for anyone who is not suckered by the absurd
tales contained therein. I'm sorry if you credit tales of
talking burning bushes but I myself can only assume that the
character Moses, if he even ever existed, was either a liar or a
psychotic (or both). The whole sorry saga proceeds with various
tales of genocidal mania on the part of the Hebrews.
In my opinion for anyone to take
this stuff literally, let alone to base their lives upon it, is
a sign of grotesque mental weakness and aberration. Not only do
I personally not need any laws, be their origin divine or human,
to behave in a decent manner towards all living beings but these
laws are akin to gun control - they are obeyed only by the
intrinsically decent person anyway. And my observations of both
historical and contemporary events lead me to conclude that the
followers of this trash are the most maniacal, bloodthirsty lot
one could ever hope not to meet, George W. Bush being the
perfect example of a man whose extreme delusional behaviour
based upon this material has led to the deaths of at least tens
of thousands of innocent people - people who would still be
alive and well under the 'evil' Saddam Hussein's rule.
Kind Regards
Peter Sault
|