Germar Rudolf - the latest letter
Will Germar Rudolf re-cant in order to save himself?
Read his latest letter from Stammheim Prison, Germany
Asperger Str 60
30 December 2005
Your letter of December 14 arrived here today. On December 1, the Mannheim Court took over censoring, hence the long posting times.
1. Re my other letters: If I do not expressly say so, you can publish it.
2. Thanks (remitting stamps).
3. This must be published: Once and for all – David Irving is a disgrace for historians and revisionists alike. He does not know what he is talking about. The well-known Hötle report on the deportation figures through the Aktion Reinhardt camps was discussed in Mattogno’s book on Belzec [- obtainable through Michael Santomauro at http://www.tadp.org ] where it is reproduced in the document appendix. Nothing in it indicates that the numbers mentioned in it are numbers of killed inmates.
If Robert Jan van Pelt claims otherwise, as the media reported, it proves once more that van Pelt is a liar. He is correct, though, that the Hötle report figures are congruent with the figures mentioned by Koherr, but Koherr expressly wrote about “deported to the east”, not killed, and he also separated these from Jews under “special treatment”, so if special treatment was death, “deported to the east” was not special treatment, hence, not death - of course, special treatment was not necessarily actual death.
As to Aumeier, I have analyzed his statement in my review of the Maser book as published in The Revisionist 4/2004, I think, and Carlo has added added some more points to his book on The Banks of Auschwitz, clearly stating that Aumeier made his absurd, anachronistic statements under duress and are therefore worthless as evidence.
David Irving never reads the books of other authors, and most certainly not those of revisionists, as he despises revisionist scholars.
He himself told me the fact of his never reading revisionist books. Hence he is an ignorant fool and he should be treated as such.
4. Aderlaß: Get in touch with Michael and Perry. They have orders to publish it in T&DP. If not, they have it now. I had an agreement with Claus. It’s his donation.
5. Who is Müller? Rabied dogs get shot.
6. You need to exercise and breathe fresh air while doing so! Strengthens your lungs!
7. Food is plenty and good since I can now buy supplements, like milk and Müslie.
8. I am both in Straf-and in U-Haft – on remand and sentenced – and receive all disadvantages of both together. Therefore: phone prohibition and long-lasting mail censorsphip.
9. No problem, but no revolt triggered yet either. Working on it, though.
10. – 13. no comment. I am isolated, so don’t expect me to comment on political bullshit going on in the world, nor on trials happening in Caparthia – Kaparten.
So far to your points. I leave 9 obscure. I do not really need anything right now. If you can, work on Aderlaß – wasn’t Damon working on it? – or Bellinger, on all other projects. That would be fine. Back to work! I’ll get a typewriter soon, so my next letter will be legible, odds are …
Alright, I leave it at that.
Have you been in touch with Marc Lemire and Bradley Smith at all? Is something moving there? Better action it than waste your time to answer me on it.
See you in a couple of years …
30. Dezember 2005
heute erhielt ich Deinen Brief vom 14. Dezember. Seit 1. Dezember hat das LG Mannheim die Zensur meiner Post übernommen, folglich die lange Wartezeit.
1. In bezug auf meine anderen Briefe: Wenn nicht ausdrücklich von mir untersagt, können diese veröffentlicht werden.
2. Danke für die Übersendung der Briefmarken.
3. Folgendes muß veröffentlicht werden: Ein für allemal sei gesagt: David Irving ist eine Blamage für Historiker, wie Revisionisten. Er weiß nicht wovon er redet. Der bekannte Hötle Bericht über die Anzahl Deportierter durch die Aktion Reinhardt Lager, wurde in den Büchern Mattognos über Belzec erfasst [erhältlich über Michael Santomauro http://www.tadp.org] wo dieser als Dokument im Anhang reproduziert ist. Nirgendwo befindet sich dort Hinweis, daß die darin vermerkten Zahlen, die Zahlen von getöteten Gefangenen sind.
Sollte Robert Jan van Pelt anderes behaupten, wie die Medien berichteten, beweist dies wieder einmal, daß van Pelt ein Lügner ist. Aber er hat insofern recht, daß die Zahlen des Hötle Berichts mit denen von Koherr benannten übereinstimmen, allerdings schreibt Koherr ausdrücklich über "deportiert in den Osten", nicht getötet, und außerdem trennte er diese von Juden unter "besondere Behandlung", wenn also besondere Behandlung Tod bedeutete, war "deportiert in den Osten" nicht besondere Behandlung, daher nicht Tod - selbstverständlich war besondere Behandlung nicht unbedingt wirklicher Tod.
Was Aumeier betrifft, so habe ich seine Aussage in meiner Rezension des Maser Buches analysiert, die, wenn ich mich recht erinnere, in "The Revisionist" 4/2004 herausgegeben ist, und Carlo hat dazu noch einige Aspekte in seinem Buch "The Banks of Auschwitz" hinzugefügt, worin er klar darstellt, daß Aumeier seine absurden, anachronistischen Angaben unter Zwang erstellte, was sie deshalb als Beweis wertlos macht.
David Irving liest die Bücher anderer Autoren nie und ganz sicher nicht die der Revisionisten, da er revisionistische Geisteswissenschaftler verschmäht.
Er selbst hat mir das als Faktum erzählt, [nämlich] daß er nie revisionistische Bücher liest. Daher ist er jemand, der sich nicht um Erkenntnis bemüht, und sollte als solcher gehandhabt werden.
4. Aderlaß: Setz' dich am besten mit Michael und Perry in Verbindung. Sie haben Anleitung zur Herausgabe in T&DP. Wenn sie die noch nicht haben, haben sie die jetzt. Ich habe mich deswegen mit Claus verständigt. Es ist seine Spende.
5. Wer ist Müller? Wütende Hunde brechen ihr Genick.
6. Du brauchst Körperertüchtigung und frische Luft während ...Das kräftigt Deine Lungen!
7. Es gibt [jetzt] genug Essen und es ist gut, seitdem ich Zusätzliches - wie Milch und Müslie - einkaufen kann.
8. Ich habe beides am Hals: Straf- und U-Haft - in Untersuchungshaft und verurteilt - und erhalte alle Nachteile beider zusammen. - Deshalb: Verbot von Telefongesprächen wie auch lang anhaltende Postzensur.
9. Kein Problem, jedoch kein ausgelöster Aufstand bisher. Schaffe dran.
10-13. Ohne Kommentar. Ich bin isoliert, erwarte also nicht, daß ich den in der Welt kursierenden politischen Müll oder sonstige Verurteilungen in den Kaparten kommentiere.
Soweit zu Deinen Fragen. No. 9 lass ich mal unklar. Ich brauche im Moment eigentlich nichts weiter. Wenn Dir möglich, arbeite an Aderlaß - arbeitet Damon nicht dran?- oder Bellinger an allen anderen Projekten. Das wäre gut. Zurück an die Arbeit! Bald kriege ich eine Schreibmaschine, so daß mein nächster Brief leserlich sein wird, was tut's...
Also gut. Das wär's dann.
Bist Du mit Marc Lemire und Bradley Smith irgendwie in Verbindung? Bewegt sich da was? Besser was tun, als Deine Zeit mit Antwort darauf an mich verschwenden.
Wir sehen uns in einigen Jahren...
Holocaust Handbooks, Volume 15:
Item No. 29
Germar Rudolf: Lectures on the Holocaust. Controversial Issues Cross Examined
In 1976, Holocaust revisionism produced its last "standard work," if there ever was such a thing: Prof. A.R. Butz' Hoax of the Twentieth Century. "How can a quarter century old text not be obsolete today?" Butz asks in the preface of the 2003 edition of his own book, pointing out "the age of this text, and the great advances that have subsequently occurred in Holocaust revisionism." Hence, there is a great need for a new, integrated work summarizing Holocaust revisionism after 30 years of very intensive and thorough research.
And here it is, the new standard work of Holocaust revisionism! It was written by German scholar, writer, and publisher Germar Rudolf, based on the research of the most prominent revisionists, most of which Rudolf had the pleasure to publish in a multitude of German and English language journals and books over the past 15 years.
The book was written to fit the need of both those who have no in-depth knowledge of the Holocaust or of revisionism, as well as for well-versed readers familiar with revisionism. Anyone who wants to bring himself up to date on revisionist scholarship, but does not want to read all the special studies that were published during the past ten years, needs this book!
Since 1992, Rudolf has been giving lectures to various mainstream audiences all over the world. His topic is very controversial: the Holocaust in the light of new forensic and historical findings. His listeners initially think they know exactly what "the Holocaust" is all about, but their world view is completely turned upside down after the evidence is presented. Even though Rudolf presents nothing short of full-fledged Holocaust revisionism, his arguments fall on fertile soil, because they are presented in a very pedagogically sensitive and scholarly way. This book is the literary version of Rudolf's lectures, enriched with the most recent finding of historiography to a topic regulated by penal law in many countries.
The book's style is unique as is its topic: It is a dialogue between the lecturers on the one hand who introduce the reader to the most important arguments and counter arguments of Holocaust Revisionism, and the reactions of the audience on the other hand: supportive, skeptical, and also hostile comments, questions, and assertions. The Lectures read like a vivid and exciting real-life exchange between persons of various points of view. The usual moral, political, and pseudoscientific arguments against revisionism are all addressed and refuted.
This book is a compendium of Frequently Asked Questions on the Holocaust and its critical reexamination. With more than 1,300 references to sources and a vast bibliography, this easy-to-understand book is the best introduction into this taboo topic both for readers unfamiliar with revisionism and for those wanting to know more.
US $30.00 568 pp. ., 6"x9", pb., ill., bibl., index (Aug. 2005) , ISBN: 1591480019 , ISSN: 1529-7748
You can place your order at: www.Tadp.org
Fredrick Töben comments: Adelaide, 31 January 2006 – the day on which Germar Rudolf’s letter arrived.
After three months of prison Germar’s steadfastness looks good – there is little likelihood that Germar will one day cry out: “Yes, I believe in the HOLOCAUST!”
Like Germar, I will continue to state: “I REFUSE TO BELIEVE IN THE HOLOCAUST!”
Horst Mahler bravely asserts the same, but expressed in even stronger terms, saying with Robert Faurisson, et al, the Holocaust is a lie!
Mahler has just has his Passport cancelled to prevent him from travelling overseas.
The Newspaper, Die Welt reports on it, and links Adelaide Institute with Mahler's work. We are proud to be associated with Horst Mahler's work.
On this day our local The Advertiser ran the following non-event article on its front page, and next to an article about a 24 year-old female music teacher facing a charge of having seduced a 15-year-old boy. A while ago a similar case occurred in Melbourne - the concerned boy had received counselling, something he rejected because it aimed to inculcate within him a feeling of having been abused by the female teacher. Most healthy 15 year-olds would feel relieved and rescued by such an incident, and certainly not be traumatised by such generous acts of love.
Another Prisoner of Conscience
Sent: Saturday, 28 January 2006 4:34 PM
To: 'Paul Fromm'
Letter from Political Prisoner Brad Love, Now Moved to Penetang
Dear Free Speech Supporter:
I've just received the following letter from political prisoner Brad Love, imprisoned since November 4 for having sent about half a dozen non-threatening letters to his local newspaper, the Etobicoke Guardian. The intrepid press, having defended freedom of expression by ratting out the opinionated Mr. Love to the local thought police, have refused to cover the story. Mr. Love is accused of breach of probation for having sent letters critical of Canada's immigration policy, letters the Crown claims, but has not proven, are "scurrilous" or "hateful;." An April date has been set for trial. Mr. Love remains in jail - no bail. Meanwhile drug pushers and armed robbers - the very criminals, mostly Black, of whom Mr. Love complained in his letters - are in and out in a revolving door process of easy bail and light sentences.
Canada's corrupt "justice" system winks at you if you're a gunman or crack dealer. It locks you up and throws away the key if you're a political dissident.
Canadian Association for Free Expression
Those who wish to help Canada's free speech victims may send their contribution by cheque or money order to Canadian Association for Free Expression, Box 332, Rexdale, ON., M9W 5L3, Canada or may e-mail their VISA and expiry date to the same address or by return e-mail
January 18, 2006
First of all, Paul, many thanks to you and Wolfgang for showing up at my court appearance yesterday. It was a brief show, of course, as I was again put over until February 10th. Giving the crown attorney even more time to line up a shrink to see me before I am released. This unreasonable and precedent-setting request is meant to be punitive to stall, wear me down, teach me a lesson. And, if you noticed, Paul, even the head cop in the case showed up, which is odd, considering the rash of real street crime out there and the fact that my case is unworthy of being there, never mind a busy cop who, you'd think, would have more important things to investigate. Oh, I bet I know, he is just following orders!
My cell mate attended City Hall Court on the same day and told me how they have special Native Courts and drug diversion courts. He spent the day watching already-convicted criminals charged with additional crimes, breach of bail, etc., and all of them were freed by day's end. And here I sit wondering: Why I can't be an Indian or a drug addict.
Received an overseas letter (UK) crammed with British news clippings regarding the illegals, crimes, scams. None of it is a surprise to veterans like us, but I was shocked that the jail let it in. Perhaps, they see things like I do for no one knows more than they which types of people are ruling their jail/city/country.
January 20, 2006
Early this morning, I was ordered to pack up. I was cuffed and shackled, loaded onto a bus with 20 others to be transported to where I am now - the Penetang Super Jail. As I write, I am writing in a holding cell to be taken to my new living area. Maplehurst was getting too crowded with big city criminals. So, to give relief, they ship a gang out whose court date is more than two weeks away. It is a real stress. It is like starting this ordeal all over again, but, no matter, I'll make it.
Two days again, the TORONTO STAR ran a photo of police Sgt Heinz Kuck reading a Martin Luther King bio to a group of 8-year-old school kids - not a white face in the crowd. And I am thinking with all of the gang crime out there, how do cops find the time to engage in such multicult propaganda. And the cop Kuck, an obvious German, how does he put up with such crap? How can he abandon his history, heritage, culture, integrity and future, simply to be used as a poster boy in this diversionary see-how-we-all-get-along photo op? What a sad and pathetic display that slights every crime victim out there, "I have a dream" is becoming "We have a nightmare!"
This northern Ontario jail is identical in structure [to Maplehurst] and is inhabited by approximately 300 local boys and 1000 of us commuters, bused up here to fill bunks and keep the local economy humming. Very few Blacks here. My company is psychotic, bald, tattooed biker types, who when not lining up for pill parade, seems to fly off the handle at the slightest occurrence, real or imagined.
This being a privately run jail, we are similar to the 407 road system, the taxpayers pay to build then turn it over to a US consortium to run it. This all means that it is a skinflint operation. Toiletries handed out sparingly; towels, etc., threadbare; absolutely no extras food-wise; limited number of books; writing supplies, doled out as if you wish for anything of quality, you have to buy it from the canteen. All of this designed to isolate you, cost you money, and wear you down.
My personal peeve is that it is difficult to obtain newspapers up here as one has to apply for a short-term subscription and that takes longer than the time I will actually be here. Meanwhile, the let's-promote-multicult-at-all-costs City TV just doesn't cut it for thinking people living in the free world. Oh sure, it is comforting to see those gunshot stories, many of which occur within ear shot of the ETOBICOKE GUARDIAN offices in Toronto, who, instead of publishing anything to expose such violence, chose, instead to rat a guy out like me, who sent them some letters about their consistent lack of reporting. When even the media jumps into the, let's-squash-free-speech business, it is time to really start to worry, folks! Even PRAVDA never went so far when it came to being the mouthpiece, eyes and ears of the government.
Not much else to report save for the fact that a new party now runs Canada and let us all hope that the Conservatives stick to their word and open up for theirs to be an accountable and accessible government. A government that does not use police agencies to silence its dissenters. And a government with the gumption and spirit of good will that frees those already in jail while facing prosecution for stating or writing what beliefs and opinions many hold so dear.
Here's to a better future, to those of us who defend it.
Brad Love, Political Prisoner
Penetang Correctional Institution
1501 Fuller Ave.
Penetanguishene, ON L9M 2H4
Truth IS a Defense
Top | Home
©-free 2006 Adelaide Institute