Dr Wilhelm Stäglich dies at 90
Dr
Wilhelm Stäglich
*11.11.1916
+5.4.2006
So
wie er den nicht geringen Herausforderungen
seines
Lebens mit Charakterstärke und Konsequenz
entgegen
trat, so stellte er sich trotz nachlassenden
Kraften
auch seinem Ende.
Nach
einem erfüllten Leben und heimtückischer,
schwerer
Krankheit ist unser Vater, Schwiegervater
und
Großvater friedlich eingeschlafen.
In
stiller Trauer und in Dankbarkeit denken wir
zurück
an sein Pflichtbewußtsein, seine
Wahrheitsliebe,
seinen Mut und seine
Großzügigkeit.
Familie Stäglich
und
alle Angehörigen
Die
Trauerfeier fand im engsten Familienkreis statt.
*
Du
weisst, daß
hinter den Wäldern blau
Die großen Berge sind.
Und
heute ist nun der Himmel grau
Und die
Erde blind.
Du weißt, daß
über den Wolken schwer
Die
schonen Sterne stehn.
Und
heute nur ist aus dem golden Heer
Kein
einziger zu sehen.
Und
warum glaubst du dann nicht auch.
Das uns
die Wolke Welt
Nur
heute als ein flüchtiger Hauch
Die
Ewigkeit verstellt?
Eugen
Roth
*
In
1997 with Dr Stäglich
On
28
March 1999 Dr
Wilhelm Stäglich and Dr Fredrick Töben in Glücksburg.
Dr
Stäglich died on 5 April 2006
______________________________________________
-----Original
Message-----
From: Bocage [mailto:bocage@club-internet.fr]
Sent: Friday, 12 May 2006 8:50 AM
Subject: Le Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich nous a quittés
Nous apprenons la mort du Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich.
Ancien magistrat de Hambourg, docteur en droit de l'Université Georg-August de Göttingen, Wilhelm Stäglich publie, en 1979, "Der Auschwitz Mythos".
Son livre contient une recension exhaustive des sources sur lesquelles repose la
connaissance que l'on a d'Auschwitz et une étude critique de ces sources.
L'auteur arrive à la conclusion que la prétendue politique d'extermination des juifs et l'emploi, à cet effet, de chambres à gaz homicides à
Auschwitz ou ailleurs sont de ces aberrations qu'engendre toute guerre et qu'entretient toute propagande de guerre.
Mais aux yeux des tribunaux l'ouvrage enfreint à tout moment le tristement célèbre article 130 du Code pénal allemand.
L'ouvrage est donc saisi et on fait même procéder par les soins de la
police à la fonte des plombs de composition. Peu après, en 1982, le Conseil des
doyens de l'université Georg-August de Göttingen retire à son auteur, pour
"indignité", son titre de docteur en droit qui lui avait été
attribué en 1951!
L'ouvrage sera néanmoins réédité en allemand, mais en Angleterre, et sera
traduit en français puis en anglais.
La version française, "Le Mythe d'Auschwitz/Etude critique", est
une traduction/adaptation qui paraîtra en 1986 aux éditions de La Vieille Taupe
(elle contient un supplément de 25 pages où le professeur Faurisson
commente personnellement des photos et une documentation en rapport avec ce mythe).
Le Dr. Stäglich était une personnalité attachante et il était estimé de
tous les révisionnistes.
==========================
From: ArtButz@aol.com
Sent: Friday, 12 May 2006 11:10 AM
Subject: Fwd: Le Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich nous a quittés
Friends:
This e-mail reports the death of Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich, one of the earliest
revisionists. In 1973 he published an article on his recollections of
Auschwitz, near which he was stationed during the war.
I believe he was 62 years old when I visited him in the summer of 1977.
A. R. Butz
=========================
Fredrick Töben
comments:
In 1983 the
University of Göttingen stripped Dr Wilhelm Stäglich of his doctorate
because he dared to question and then to reject the 'Holocaust' story as
presented in his book Der Auschwitz
Mythos,1979,which developed out of a brief article Dr Stäglich had written in 1973.
The reason for revoking his doctorate rested on the absurd notion that his
book on Auschwitz denigrated academic standards.
This 1983 action intimidated German academics into silence, and it was a few
years before Germany enacted specific 'Holocaust' protection laws in the form
of that notorious Section 130 of the Criminal Penal Code, which formalised
and implemented the nonsensical defamation principle of "defaming the
memory of the dead". Dr Stäglich never tired of stating that if only
there were a hundred judges courageous enough to withstand the pressure to
political correctness, then Germans would be liberated from the Auschwitz
lie.
Dr Stäglich, a judge himself, never apologised and never retracted anything
contained in his book. He used to reflect on how the book actually saw the
day of light, but was saddened when his intimate helper, his wife, in
this project to set the record straight about Auschwitz, passed away. He
predicted that he would not live to see the 'Holocaust' myth crumble.
Here are two
predictive early comments on the intellectual suppression that has
intensified to the point of imprisonment - not yet outright judicial murder
of Revisionists. One fears for Germar Rudolf's and
Ernst Zündel's safety
while they are imprisoned at Stammheim and Mannheim.
Professor Robert
Faurisson:
“In the
mid-twentieth century appeared a phenomenon which, we had come to believe,
had vanished in the sixteenth century: the University of Göttingen withdrew
the doctorate degree it had awarded to Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich in 1951. This
was a logical consequence of the return to the stupidities of a distant past.
Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich, German judge and historian, has defended the honor of
Germany’s judges and historians. He himself has lost almost everything, but
not his honor.”
Professor Arthur R.
Butz:
“Dr. Wilhelm Stäglich
has produced the only serious full length study devoted entirely to
Auschwitz, the center piece of the received legend of Jewish
‘extermination’. The malicious persecution of Judge Stäglich in Germany,
and the official suppression there of Der Auschwitz-Mythos, could serve
as a paradigm of behavior commonly associated only with totalitarian states,
but our supposed guardians of civil liberties have chosen to look the other
way in this. Thus the reader should realize that he has in his hands a work
unusually revealing, not only of an important aspect of World War Two
history, but also of frightful conditions in contemporary society.”
---more to come -
====================================
here's a fitting
reflection on what this Revisionist battle is all about
From John
Kaminski Friday, 12 May
2006
The Mindlock, Part 1 - Man on the Fence
The legendary Greek hero Leonidas held a pass and fended off thousands of
Persian invaders with only 13 men (before being wiped out, of course). But
the impossible maneuver won the war, and Greece stayed free, at least for
that one brief historical moment about twenty five hundred years ago.
So now today, here's our intrepid hero, who occasionally fancies himself that
Greek sentinel, sitting uncomfortably on top of a white picket fence, as he
watches that fence begin to burn at its base. In fact, the entire fence is
engulfed in flame, turning a sickening wrinkled black at the bottom as it
creeps upwards to exactly where he is sitting.
He not only knows it's only a matter of time before the inevitable question
confronts all living things. But now he also knows that that time is right
now, for him, and for everyone else as well.
As the numbers of homeless radically increase on the streets of America and
the white train cars get ready to roll from American military facilities, the
time to decide is now. It always is.
But decide what, you may ask?
His choice, as he ponders the flames flicker closer to his feet, is either
— sound the alarm or go back to sleep? Protest against something he appears
not to be able to stop, or simply kick back and live his life as best he can,
and let the bleeding people he chooses not to look at it fall dead in their
tracks wherever they happen to be?
To aspire, or to expire? Ah, that is the question. When you give up hoping,
the process of decay and death accelerates. An essential vitality is lost,
and this is true in all living things. The imprint of this concession is now
visible in almost all areas of human endeavor. A tedious weariness. A
lethargic unwillingness to fight for one’s own survival.
The point the man on the fence has been trying to make is simply not seen by
most people — not wanted. It impinges on personal privacy paradigms. They
want things that make them healthy, and talking about the issues he has been
talking about can make you suddenly unhealthy, or suddenly dead.
But then, so does not talking about them.
The question he asks politely as he watches the spreading fire inch closer to
his toenails — is something wrong with this picture? Or is this just the
story of humanity playing out perpetually, Romans slaughtering Gauls, Vikings
burning England, Columbus cutting off the hands of the Taino, and that boy
from Poughkeepsie putting a bullet in the head of an Iraqi woman he had just
raped?
What is wrong with the picture if this is exactly the way humanity appears to
have proceeded throughout its long and destructive history? You can't change
the way things are. God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot
change, the old saw sings.
Personally, I never liked that tune that much.
So do I accept the mass extermination of the human herd and shuffle off
quietly to the dissenter camp — Camp Ashcroft, I like to call it. In most
times these opponents of the herd program would be rehabilitated, retrained,
as Orwell suggested in 1984. But now the herd is so big that all these camps
have no facilities, no purpose except as secure extermination facilities.
Maybe the answer to the fuel problem, ey? Maybe Soylent Green.
The policies that have been put in place at Guantanamo and throughout the
depraved American gulag now spread all over the world are now being used on
the American population.
Consider the operating principles in your mind: the truth doesn’t matter,
nobody’s innocent, and anyone can be killed if they don’t play along.
That’s the deal. You read about it every day in the newspapers.
Already, the spigots of society have been turned down to a trickle, and many
will die of thirst. Even those who have filled their canteens well will feel
the drought, as the people of Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan and so many
other places have felt this same sad stark drought for centuries.
Yet some would say this is precisely the pressure created by overpopulation.
Meanwhile, they're eating pygmies in Africa, and two million people LIVE in
the landfills of Rio de Janeiro, not far from the posh hotels where you play.
The man on the fence rises up and cries out, “Should we try to fix this or
just accept it as it is?”
The problem with waiting this long is that the fire is much more difficult to
put out, especially since most people don't even believe there actually IS a
fire. It simply hasn't occurred to them. Or, they continue to refuse to let
the information in. They won’t hear the alarms being sounded in cyberspace,
on TV and in front of their own eyes.
And what information is that? you may ask.
The Jewish tradition teaches that you are entitled to seek revenge. Is that a
good thing or not? And what has it done to our world?
The Christian tradition teaches us to turn the other cheek. And what has that
accomplished, except to create a population of more willing slaves?
The tradition of Muhammad (PBUH) espouses a family of humans each of whom has
a direct line to God with no intermediary translators necessary, easily the
best deal among the monotheistic religions.
The ordinary common sense of an average nonspiritual but honest man can
clearly see that all humans are criminals who naturally do what’s best for
themselves.
What is it you hoped to be? How much are you willing to learn? As the fire
crackles toward where you’re sitting, and your toenails start to curl from
the heat, the money runs out, your home is flooded out and geeks in black
masks patrol your neighborhood, what are you going to do ... ?
The man on the fence asks himself this question, as the flames lick higher.
----------
John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf
Coast of Florida whose essays have been seen on hundreds of websites around
the world. He is also one of the most censored writers on the Internet,
because he dares to say what many believe but are afraid to say themselves.
His latest collection, Recipe for Extinction, is available at http://www.johnkaminski.com/
Top|
Home
©-free 2006 Adelaide
Institute
