-----Original
Message-----
From: Barry Chamish
[mailto:chamish@netvision.net.il]
Sent: Thursday, 15 December 2005 10:13 AM
To: info@adelaideinstitute.org
Subject: letter
This is vital. I have a court case coming up and I request you e-mail the
following verification. The problem is you put me in your Christmas family
without asking me. Please write that it was done without asking my
permission.
Please write in the letter the following facts:
1. I have never requested that you post my material. You have chosen to do so
independently.
2. I am not affiliated with your institute in any way.
3. You are aware that I am not a Holocaust denier, nor have I ever written
material justifying Holocaust denial.
4. Your interest in me has nothing to do with such denial.
Do me this favor quickly or I'll lose a suit.
Best, Barry
---------------------------------------------------
Comment from Fredrick Töben: I did not ask Barry Chamish to whom he was addressing his email because I assumed it was me, and I brush aside why he could not find the strength to mention me by name!
I responded thus:
This is a
quick reply. I do not understand Christmas family reference -
Have a look at
http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissenters1/Toben/toben_chamish.htm -
and open attachment -
Then advise. Fredrick
------------------------------------------------------------------
TO WHOM IT
MAY CONCERN
15 December 2005
1. This is to confirm that I have known Mr Barry Chamish for a number
of years. We have never met but I have been following his thinking processes
via emails and material he publishes on his website, especially his
elaboration of his Rabin-murder hypothesis.
2. Although Mr Chamish is a fervent Zionist, and I refuse to believe
in the ‘Holocaust’, I have gained valuable information about his cause - his
concern as to what is happening to those Jews who have come to Israel in the
belief that there they can fulfil their dream in peace.
3. I empathise with Mr Chamish and the plight of those Jews who have
been removed from their homes – at the same time I empathise with the
Palestinian peoples who should never have been removed from their homes in
the first place. There was relative peace in Palestine while the area was
under Muslim control.
4. In 2004 I invited Mr Chamish to our planned International
Revisionist conference at Sacramento where I wished him to present the
Zionist perspective on the Middle East conflict. The conference as planned
did not take place on account of the venue being cancelled. We had nothing to
do with the substitute conference, which Mr Chamish did not attend.
5. Throughout the past years I have forwarded through our list
numerous emails that Mr Chamish published about matters pertaining to his
interests – which I headed “A View from Israel”. I received some criticism
from individuals who were not interested in such material, and I advised that
as we have one list only, those who did not like Mr Chamish’s material, could
just delete these emails.
6. In summary: Mr Chamish has never requested I pass on his emails
through our list, and to my knowledge he has never passed on any of the
material that passed through our list. There is no link with Mr Chamish and
Adelaide Institute and the traffic is a one-way road that I personally
nurture because of my concern to give the ‘enemy’ a voice in our
deliberations, in particular about the Middle East situation. It is clear
that Mr Chamish is a Holocaust believer while I refuse to believe in the
Holocaust. Further, I support the Iranian position on matters Palestine.
However, as someone whose training has been in philosophy, I cannot accept
positions that are not subjected to revision, especially when new information
about a matter becomes available.
Sincerely
Dr Fredrick Töben
Director
Adelaide Institute
