The Captain speaks on the unspeakable - the Jewish problem - and explains his position

 

 

From: Eric May
Sent: Tuesday, 18 October 2005 1:46 AM
To: Jonathan Stephenson; shanker@nytimes.com


Subject: Fundamentalist and Jewish Zionists, and what should be done [Yin and Yang perspectives]


(LT Woodard, kindly post this email thread to OTT!)

Dear Mr. Stephenson,

Many thanks for your sage comments. While I could have added the qualifications you mention, I omit them for a reason (and it's not space!). I have dealt extensively both with the Fundamentalist and Jewish communities, and agree with you that the militantly Zionist part of both communities (since for the first time we now speak of Christian Zionists, too) is not the majority. What I don't believe is that the majority of both communities doesn't tacitly accept the militant minority.

I re-include the press release we of Ghost Troop have issued, giving confirmed "news" that the Zionist-controlled US Media has repressed for 30 months, in complete disregard of the tenets of the Constitution and the ethics of journalism: http://www.nationalvanguard.org/printer.php?id=6479 .

The simple fact is that these deaths were repressed by a Zionist-dominated professional group, and who can blame me and mine if we make the politically incorrect, but factually correct, point that Jews covered up Christian deaths? It's not my aim to let anyone off the hook, because the tendency to let folks off the hook is what made folks bold enough to do evil in the first place! Remember Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir's comments to the World Islamic Conference back in the fall of 2003? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1009668/posts . He said that US Jews dominated US cultural and political life -- and given that 80% of the Neocons are Jewish, it's not my fault -- nor Mahathir's -- that his remarks are right on!

My sincere belief and hope is that the fence-sitters in both Jewish and Christian Zionist circles will realize that the room for hedging is rapidly disappearing, and that they had better beat a retreat away from the Zionist leaders who have used far cruder generalizations than I have to turn their communities in homicidal degree against Moslems! If the majority of those communities are not tacitly approving, then where, for heaven's sake, then why do they continue to keep silence? Saying that they are trying -- in this or that obscure way -- to put the brakes on their brethren is simply making excuses for them, and that is what those who abide evil always count on.

Incidentally, there's nothing I'm saying about collective guilt that hasn't been said by Elie Wiesel, the famous Holocaust survivor and author of (inter alia) "Night" -- a book all faiths should read religiously (particularly as it's only a hundred-page read!). I saw Wiesel at a conference in which he received the question: "How should the Germans -- even those who weren't Nazis -- do about the fact of the Holocaust?"

Wiesel's answer was stark: "That's a problem for the Germans." In a similar vein, the willingness of Christian Zionists and Jewish Zionists to follow leaders like Pat Robertson or Charles Krauthammer is a problem for those Zionist partners to deal with. I'm no more inclined to accept excuses for this imperial, genocidal war than the Nuremberg witnesses were inclined to absolve the German People of participation in the Third Reich.

Perhaps I am severe, but the times call for unequivocal, severe statements. Had more harsh men spoken more quickly, more convincingly, and less equivocally, we would have avoided this national stain of being the new Nazis. We know it not at all, because our preachers and our pundits have locked arms to convince us that God is on our side (Gott mit uns -- it's been said...), but the rest of the world knows it well.

Again, I thank you for being candid, and understand that all your better instincts and views lead you to decry my mental militarism on the Zionism Question, but knowing what I know I can do no other. I was raised Baptist in Dixie, and I made my way for a decade as a media writer (NBC and the Houston Chronicle being a couple of my gigs), so I'm not attacking anyone I don't know, and indeed, haven't sympathized with in days when they weren't committing mass homicide. The saner parts of the Zionist Communities (Christian and Jews) must take control of their own Frankenstein monster of a new crusade, or they will endure more attacks like mine, and eventually, more severe attacks than mine. It's a problem for the Zionists, my friend!

By the way, I tried mightily to bring the problem of Zionist criminal war to the Jewish Community itself, with which I once enjoyed good relations. Here's one of many polite brush-offs I received after strongest exhortations to them to join me in preventing the Middle Eastern Holocaust we have undertaken: http://www.ghosttroop.net/holocaustmuseumdec8.htm . Contrast the tone and spirit of that email with the stark fact in the first link I mention in this email and note that the former was published by the National Vanguard, a strongly anti-Zionist (some would say antisemitic) group. Can anyone condemn me for forging links with folks I previously wouldn't have dealt with when they're the only ones willing to deal with the truth of this war of cover ups?

I welcome your insights, even criticisms, but failing some effort by the Zionists to control their own monsters, I doubt that I'll change tactics, and I know very well that others are more outraged than I am -- and that it's not my problem, but the problem of the Zionists.

Regards and thanks, CPTMAY

PS: I've been making a bit of noise about things relating to this issue on Cloak and Dagger radio, in interviews with hosts Lenny Bloom and Sherman Scholnik. The question came up again and again in our interview about the July 2003 time-frame that covers the Rove/Libbey attacks on Wilson/Plame. You can find the interview, which deals with what I believed and reacted to back in those bad old days, given that I'd written an op-ed that was published in my home paper, the Houston Chronicle, which was published as a continuation of Wilson's attack on July 6, 2003. My piece ran of July 8, 2003 -- and ten days later I had dived into the underground, told by military intelligence contacts of mine that I would suffer far worse than "outing" if I didn't! The interview is a bit over halfway down the page at: http://www.cloakanddagger.de/ , and tells much more about what happened to those of us who were fighting the infowar back when the propaganda war was getting physical in response to us.


Jonathan Stephenson wrote:
Dear Eric,
While I agree with almost all you wrote here, there are two points I'd disagree with on substance, that being that all Fundamentalist Christians are supporters of Bush, and that all Jews are Zionists, this is a great difference today, vis-a-vis Nazi Germany. I belong to many Christian Groups, many Fundamentalist, those who believe in the liturgy literally, have taken note that the most important lesson of the Bible is helping the poor, the widow, the orphan, the stranger, the helpless, the hopeless, and this, the Fascist Bushites are totally opposed to, and indeed I believe even a majority of real Fundamentalist Christians, which includes a large percentage of African American Pentecostals are not fascist oriented at all, but actually try to ignore politics. For Jews, it is the same, the Zionists are probably even a smaller percentage of Jews than Fascist Fundamentalists are among Christians, as witness many large Orthodox Jewish protests in New York, against Zionism.
I understand that for purposes of space and simplicity you didn't want to go into detail on a peripheral issue, but its unfair and unfortunate that all people who claim a particular name, as identifying their belief system should be lumped together as one cohesive entity. Other than this point it is an excellent piece. Sincerely, Jonathan Stephenson

Eric May
Frieda, a teen in the Third Reich writes about:
Germany In 1933: The Easy Slide Into Fascism
by Bernard Weiner
Co-Editor, The Crisis Papers, June 9, 2003

a goodly number of folks wonder if they're living in America in 2003 or Germany in 1933. .............My personal dejavoo experience...FF

All this emphasis on nationalism, the militarization of society, identifying The Leader as the nation, a constant state of fear and anxiety heightened by the authorities, repressive laws that shred constitutional guarantees of due process, wars of aggression launched on weaker nations, the desire to assume global hegemony, the merging of corporate and governmental interests, vast mass-media propaganda campaigns, a populace that tends to believe the slogans and lies it's fed without asking too many questions, a timid opposition that barely contests the administration's reckless adventurism abroad and police-state policies at home, etc. etc.

The parallels are not exact, of course; America in 2003 and Germany seventy years earlier are not the same, and Bush certainly is not Adolf Hitler. But there are enough disquieting similarities in the two periods at least to see what we can learn -- cautionary tales, as it were -- and then figure out what to do with our knowledge.


CPTMAY adds: NEVER FORGET!

I believe, my dear Frieda, that Bush would be Hitler if only he could. Candidly, they are identical in their megalomaniacal mass-homicidality; all the differences (intelligence, courage, self-dedication) favor the herrenvolk Hitler, and work against the chutzpah Hitler. Imitation is the truest form of praise, I suppose, and I wonder where Boy George keeps his swastika!

I think the social aspects of the Nazi/Neocon parallel should be mentioned as well: I have enough Moslem friends to know that their position is analogous to that of the German Jews. As for the Christian Fundamentalists and their obsessive credulousness and willing to follow a militarist-manufactured messiah, that's identical, too. As for the Catholic Church's uneasiness about the fact that it will sit on its hands while a world war pends..., that's identical, too. As for the erosion of civil rights, folks going to football games or boarding subways are now subjected to random searches. On the internet nowadays, folks like me who are into investigation have to type in codes half the time they make inquiry or contact (the reason, no matter what the screen says, being understood as surveillance and intimidation via the prospect of surveillance).

My dear Frieda, you are wasting your talent and experience. Shucks, I'm a ghostwriter with a good pedigree, and am a lifelong scholar of the Nazis, political and military aspects; I have several friends (most deceased now, alas) who were trapped in the mind-warp of the
Third Reich and the Second World War... Why don't we collaborate on a book that would be so easy for us, even in the matter of the title: FOURTH REICH / THIRD WORLD WAR !

The only point I would want to make that would be objectionable to the average American (quasi)intellectual would be that the Nazi Party of this mass-murderdom is the Nozi Party. The phrase is my invention, I believe, and is showing up in search engines. It simply means that the propaganda power of this neo-Reich is the NOZI (anagram for ZION) interests who rule our media so completely that no one in the world is oblivious to it except ourselves (who depend on the Nozi Party for our information!). It's the saddest parallel of all, isn't it? The people who suffered the most under Hitler are those most instrumental in putting the Hitler dynamic back into effect! I suppose there is something, after all, to the notion that those who have been traumatized are most prone to inflict that very form of trauma onto others. I used to sympathize (before this post-911/Reichstag period) with the "Never Forget!" motto that was inscribed over the portals of the many Holocaust Museums that sprang up in the 1990's, and in fact, when I was the editorial writer for Houston's NBC affiliate, wrote a very moving editorial in recognition of the opening of the Houston Holocaust Museum. Not so any longer. "Never Forget" appears (like so much of the propaganda coding central to fascism) to have had a dual meaning. I think it was meant to tell the Christians to never forget how bad the Nazis were to the Jews..., and was meant to remind the Nozi Party of how they should go about getting the same thing done to the Moslems!

Folks you knew as leaders, thinkers and artists existed in the Third Reich indulged in the exact same kind of devices, as you know but most Americans don't -- and can't, absent a great amount of historical study. They talked elliptically about "Final Solutions" and snickered to think that the "squares" wouldn't get it -- and that they would be able to deny knowledge in the end if things fell apart. They justified "pre-emptive defense" as a salvation for their nation and a boon for mankind. They wrote their own "Never Forget" slogans over their facilities, my favorite being, of course, Arbeit Macht Frei.

Do you know, poor Dr. Guenther worked with me through all my analysis of the matter, from my early explorations of the Battle of Baghdad Cover Up - BOBCUP - [ http://neworleans.indymedia.org/news/2005/10/5809.php ] to my most unsettling Embedded Code analysis [ http://www.whale.to/b/may.html ]. In our last conversation I finally tied together what neither of us wanted to face: the Nozi Party instead of the Nazi Party, and a fabric of media manipulation that went back a decade or more; in short, a premeditated 911 Coup, Fascist Empowerment, Third World War and, ultimately, a genocide of the Arabs. I believe he never recovered from the shock, sadness and sureness he felt when he concurred with my analysis. He died several months late, and we never spoke again; I loved the man too well to afflict him again with my analysis. NEVER FORGET!

Yours as always, CPTMAY

PS: We haven't met in person, so I send along a couple of photos of me from Camp Casey!

http://it.news.yahoo.com/050822/38/3cqxn.html

http://homepage.mac.com/kaaawa/iblog/C177199123/E20050823090852/

 

 

From Adelaide Institute file:

 

 

Captain Eric May

 

"Superstitious people may use reason and understanding some of the time"- FT

------------------------

US Supreme Court nomination, Harriet Miers' Qualifications Are 'Non-Existent'

-----------------------------

Oceania and Orwell:

The October 2005 Bali Bombings

"The first information is the most important in getting a good read on any of these arranged events, and this one seems arranged to me. The rough order of events as I recall them is:..."      - read on

 

 

A no-match contest for Hitler

From: D A A
Sent: Tuesday, 18 October 2005 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: The Captain speaks on the unspeakable - the Jewish problem - and explains his position

One thing Hitler did that Bush has never done was to put the welfare of his own people first. From the soup kitchens of 1933 to full employment, clothing, education, hospital and old age care, rights for his countryman were above those of foreign powers. He CARED for his people and believed in his country. You can't say that about Bush.

 

From: Peter Wakefield Sault
Sent: Tuesday, 18 October 2005 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: The Captain speaks on the unspeakable - the Jewish problem - and explains his position


Cap'n May compares Bush to Hitler. He must have misheard someone say something, sometime.

Bush is an ARSEHOLE, not an ARTIST.

 

___________________________________________________

 

On things ANTISEMITISM and RACISM

within ZIONIST, RACIST ISRAEL

___________________________________________________

 

More on the Nazi-hunting antics of Dr Efraim Zuroff

- throw money at the problem - what problem?

- When there are no more left, Zuroff says he will turn his

efforts to rebutting historical revisionism and Holocaust denial.

- Who will oppose Dr Zuroff's witch-hunts?
- read on

 

More on truth denier Zuroff The Twilight of the Nazi Hunter
 

Top of Page | Home Page

-free 2005 Adelaide Institute