Monday, 9 May 2005

 

1. Prof Arthur Butz

2. Dr Fredrick Töben

3. Horst Mahler

4. Prof Robert Faurisson

5. Germany has no Peace Treaty with Allies

6. Romanian jail term for Holocaust revisionism

7. Paul Fromm

8. Anti-Wall demonstration

 

====================================================================

From: ArtButz@aol.com
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:56 AM
Subject: the big horror cram

"We've not extended the school day, we've not extended the school year. When is it too much?"

This article in today's Chicago Tribune relates the practical impact on Illinois high school teachers of legislation mandating teaching about genocide and other atrocities. It started in 1990 with the requirement that students study the "Holocaust" but now everybody wants their pet grievances entertained.

A.R. Butz

===================


Schools fear lawmakers will cram in more courses

By Grace Aduroja and Erika Slife
Tribune staff reporters

May 8, 2005

As far as students this year in teacher Lionel Allen's history class are concerned, the 1920s were nearly non-existent. Same for the Depression.

The Oak Park and River Forest High School educator says he's had to make some difficult curriculum choices to ensure that students receive a smorgasbord of historical topics.

"Why does it have to be a give and take? Time," said Allen, who focused on both World Wars, including the Holocaust, and the Vietnam War. "I think that's a challenge that every history teacher has to deal with."

It's a common dilemma among Illinois educators who must incorporate a slew of required topics into already jam-packed curriculums. This legislative session, Illinois lawmakers have proposed more than 40 bills that could require even more of schools, including several that would lengthen the list of must-teach subjects.

One proposal, which the House passed, would broaden an existing mandate that requires that high school students get a unit on the Holocaust. The measure, which is awaiting Senate action, would also require schools to add instruction on other recent occurrences of genocide, including the slaughter in Rwanda in the 1990s and the atrocities done to Cambodians by the Khmer Rouge in the 1970s.

"Every year they add new requirements that teachers have to teach, and students have to learn and they never increase the school day or school year," complained Ben Schwarm, associate executive director of the Illinois Association of School Boards. "That's why they have to impose each one, one by one. It's drip by drip but pretty soon the bucket gets full."

Out of bounds?

The genocide bill has educators discussing how far lawmakers in Springfield should be allowed to step into their classrooms and if they are qualified to legislate teacher curriculums.

"It's always an interesting quandary when non-professionals consistently dictate what professionals in the field are doing," said Lorie Cristofaro, a Glenbard East High School teacher for 11 years, said. "That's our job as social studies teachers, to make (students) more aware of things going on in the world."

What is especially frustrating to some educators is that, while districts are wrestling with budget deficits and overcrowded classes, legislators are talking about adding more things to teach.

Already swamped by the pressure to comply with state testing standards, some teachers say added teaching mandates will only siphon off more time from classroom instruction.

But supporters of the genocide bill argue that failing to teach students about the prevalence of ethnic and political killings would be more detrimental than the strain of increasing teacher workloads. Awareness could be a key factor in stopping future acts of genocide and curbing indifference, they say.

"This is a lesson that has never been learned. It's entirely appropriate guidance," said Steve Buenning, a world history teacher at Fremd High School in Palatine. "I don't think it's unnecessarily burdensome at all."

Illinois was at the forefront of national education policy in 1990 when it required schools to incorporate study of the Holocaust into curriculums. If the new measure is passed, Illinois will join select states, including California and Rhode Island, trying to broaden education about genocide.

In addition to Cambodia and Rwanda, the bill would require teaching about genocide in Armenia and Ukraine as well as more recent atrocities in Bosnia and Sudan. Proponents say that schools should not limit discussions to those tragedies but include others as well, such as the disappearances of political dissenters in Argentina and Chile; or human rights violations that have occurred in places such as El Salvador.

Movie highlights issue

The recent Oscar-nominated film Hotel Rwanda highlights this problem in its depiction of the United States and much of the world turning a blind eye a decade ago to the slaughter of 800,000 Rwandans by their countrymen during a 100-day killing spree.

"Genocides are still happening, and we need to expand our knowledge on it, " said Katya Mischenko-Mycyk, a board member for the Ukrainian Genocide Famine Foundation, a Chicago group that supports the bill. "It's almost unfair to students just to see a small piece of the historic picture."

Rep. John Fritchey (D-Chicago), the bill's sponsor, said incorporating recent events into classroom lessons would resonate with students who live in a fast-paced world where today's technological advances are ancient history tomorrow.

"I have a 9-year-old daughter. In her mind, learning about something that happened 60 years ago is the same as learning about something that happened 200 years ago," he said. "This brings the reality of genocide much closer to home for them and they're much more able to grasp what it is they're being taught and that's really what this is about."

Other lawmakers argued that schools already desperate for cash would have problems covering the costs of supplies for new topics. However, Fritchey said that non-profit organizations already have pledged to donate literature and volunteer speakers.

Instead, some opponents suggest that lawmakers consider more sensible solutions that wouldn't bog districts down with unfunded rules.

Rep. Suzanne Bassi (R-Palatine), a former educator who was one of the 11 House members to vote against the bill, said she agrees with the spirit of the legislation but is against the lack of funding to help carry it through. She suggests educators be taught how to incorporate the subject of genocide in their lessons as a more reasonable fix.

"They can bring it into our classroom without writing a state law for it," she said.

Glenbard East's Cristofaro says that she and many of her peers are already doing this. At the beginning of each class, she engages her students in a brief discussion on current events, including the ethnic strife in Sudan.

"It is imperative that we treat educators as professionals and trust that they are teaching these human-rights issues in the classroom," she said.

While many educators say that is a laudable goal, they also say it is made that much harder every time the legislature orders schools to teach something specific.

"We've not extended the school day, we've not extended the school year," said Deanna Sullivan, director of governmental relations for the Illinois Association of School Boards. "When is it too much?"--------Article URL----------------
gaduroja@tribune.com
eslife@tribune.com
Copyright © 2005, Chicago Tribune

2. Dr Töben

 

Mike Hodgson: To challenge a person's Will is the ultimate act of disrespect.

 

8 May 2005: Revelation on VE Day – a legal precedent case in Australia

Today around lunchtime, Adelaide time, a Process Server left a court document for me at Adelaide Institute’s physical address – my home. For a moment I thought that someone had initiated legal action against Adelaide Institute and deliberately, as a present so to speak, ensured the writ would be delivered on this very day.

Whenever there is a happening, such as the above, I always expect the worse and hope for the best. In this case the document turned out not to be a writ but court advice on a matter concerning one of our long-time supporters, the Estate of Mr Michael Charles Murphy, who had passed away on 7 October 2002.

I clearly recall Michael informing me in 2002 that he would be withdrawing from active Revisionism until further notice – and now I know what he meant by this. His exit from this life was according to his belief – without fanfare and complaint. He left in his Will meticulous instructions for the setting up of a Trust Fund that would continue his most important but uncompleted Revisionist work.

As he states in his will:
 

Library
I amassed a modest library of around 2000 books which assisted in my many research projects. Many are scarce and the replacement value might be around $150,000 - $180,000. A complete catalogue exists detailing the title and the purchase price of each book.
The library is not to be sold, lent, divided, or disposed of in any way; but it is to remain as a whole. One reason to hold on to them is that those who may wish to complete my books may need to consult or refer to its publications.

Unpublished works
Over a period of some thirty-five years of research, mostly conducted in my spare time, I amassed a large amount of material filling some 145 volumes. I was driven often by curiosity which took me into areas not often explored by others or were looked at from a different perspective.

It is a pity that so much of my time had to be spent earning a living producing things of little value, that resulted in my books being left in various states of incompletion. Also a pity was that so much effort was expended yet nothing had been published…

The following titles are research projects that I began in 1967:

1967 The Royal Genealogy of Ancient Egypt  -11 volumes of notes.

1982 House Folklore and Customs. Beliefs of the Northern European Peoples around the world -11 Volumes.

1983 German Nationalism, Religion and Occultism - 11 volumes.

1993 The Allies and the Holocaust: Fact and Fiction of World War II, 1905-1945  - 2 volumes.

1993 Nazi Germany and the Holocaust: Fact and Fiction of World War II, 1933-1945  - 1 volume.

1993 Nazi Death Camps: Fact and Fiction of World War II, 1933-1945  - 1 volume.

1993 World War II and the Holocaust, 1945-2005  - 3 volumes.

1993 From Hollywood to Holocaust: Myth Making and the Mass Media  - 3 volumes.

 

Michael’s Will is now being contested, and legal advice received by the challenger is rather startling for Revisionists. In his Will, Michael wishes to have his money flow to Adelaide Institute, IHR, David Irving and Ernst Zündel, among others. The Legal Advice tabled in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Sydney Registry Equity Division Probate List No. 6187 of 2003, discounts the Revisionists as ‘educationally’ and ‘charitably’ not eligible as beneficiaries.

This personally is quite disturbing because legal advice negates Michael as a serious researcher, something that the above list of manuscripts contradicts.

Legal advice offered by Acting Master Berecry, of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Sydney, on 25 February 2005, received by Michael’s sister, Karin Ellis, who is contesting her brother’s will, states:


(27) In respect of Messrs Zundel and Irving the terms of the will impinge the rule against perpetuities – see paragraph 23 above. Therefore, the will fails in respect of the provision for Messrs Zundel and Irving.

Adelaide Institute
(36) The evidence suggests that this organisation (Adelaide Institute) does not fall within any of the four categories for a charitable trust. In the words of the founder (sic) it is a one-man crusade sponsoring a revisionist view of the holocaust. it does not have any community benefit nor could it be regarded as having as its purpose a bona fide educational purpose.
(37) The gift fails because the purpose of the institute is either political or propaganda. In Tudor on trusts, 9th edition, the learned author says 2.020 … Whilst ‘educating’ has consistently been given a wide meaning, a gift to increase the sum of knowledge available without provision for propagating it has been said not to be charitable. (Re Shaw (1957) 1 WLR 729). A useful summary of the distinction is made by Iacobucci J in Vancouver Society of Immigrant and Visible Minority Women v Minister of National Revenue (1999) 169 DLR (4th) 34 at 113:

(T)he threshold criterion for an educational activity must be some legitimate targeted attempt at educating others, whether through formal or informal instruction, training, plans of self-study or otherwise. Simply providing an opportunity for people to educate themselves, such as by making available materials with which this might be accomplished but need not be, is not enough.

… Secondly, the purpose must not be propagandist. The public must be presented with neutral information (sic) so that they can choose for themselves: Re Bushnell (Deceased) 1 ALL ER 721 at 729 per Golding J and cannot be presented with slanted and selective information in support of a pre-conceived point of view.

(38) Therefore, the gift fails as it is clear that the purposes of the Institute are neither educational nor beneficial to the community.

Institute of Historical Review
(39) The purpose of the institute is stated as being for the promotion of public awareness of key chapters of 20th century history that has social-political relevance today. This is achieved by publishing material and conducting seminars. However, the material accompanying the plaintiff’s statement the facts revealed that the institute promotes a revisionist view of history in particular of the holocaust and appears to have a fixation towards Jews and Jewish organisations.

(40) The purpose of the institute is purely propaganda or a revisionist view of history held by its members. The material published by the institute lacks objectivity for neutrality. In Re Hopkins (Deceased) (1949) 1 ALL ER 346 at 350, 352 Vasey J noted that

“…political propaganda masquerading…as education is not education as defined for charitable purposes…the testators object was, not education in the proper sense of that word, but the furtherance of his political view and the better equipping of those who make it their business to further them.”

Clearly the trust fails in respect of the Institute.
 

A resolution of this matter in the Sydney Supreme Court will send a clear message to Revisionists – that their Will is not safe from those who do not share their world view. Whichever way this matter goes – has gone already – it reveals that the judicial system has already laws in place that will strip dead Revisionists of their accumulated wealth for reasons indicated in the legal advice offered by Acting Master Berecry to Michael’s sister, Karen Ellis. The hypocrisy contained in the legal advice speaks for itself, and it indicates the inroads this all-pervasive Holocaust propaganda has made into our legal system.

Dr Fredrick Töben

Adelaide Institute

8 May 2005

 

 

3.  Horst Mahler


Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 8:37 AM
Subject: AW: AW: [deutscheskolleg] DK-Erklärung zum 1. Mai 2

 

Weil du aber lau bist und weder kalt noch warm, werde ich dich ausspeien aus meinem Munde.

[Die Offenbarung des Johannes. Apk 3, 16)]

Lieber Herr Honold,

der Unterschied zwischen meiner Position in der Judenfrage und dem Standpunkt dazu des Deutschen Kollegs ist in Wahrheit  ein Gegensatz. Ich folge Carl Schmitt, der auf die Bedeutung eines richtigen Feindbildes hinweist. Feind ist immer ein Volksgeist. Demokratie ist kein Volksgeist, sondern nur das Mycel (Pilzfäden), mit dem uns der Feind durchsetzt hat. Der Versuch, dieses aus  dem Volkskörper zu entfernen,  gleicht dem Versuch, mit einem Besen  das Wasser des Ozeans von der Küste fernzuhalten. Nein, man muß dort ansetzen, wo das Mycel seinen Ausgang nimmt: bei Alljuda.

Es muß doch etwas zu bedeuten haben, daß die Identifizierung des feindlichen Zentrums mir so zahlreiche „gut gemeinte  Ratschläge“ einbringt, doch dieses Thema nicht oder wenigstens nicht so deutlich anzusprechen.

Sie schreiben:  „Stürzt die Demokratie durch die Verwirklichung der selbstbewussten Volksgemeinschaft, stürzt die diese begründende Judenherrschaft.“ 

Ich fürchte, wir könnten die Demokratie durch die Orange-Revolution stürzen sehen als Zementierung der Judenherrschaft auf einem höheren Niveau, wenn es uns nicht gelingt, Alljuda als Strippenzieher dieses Umsturzes  wahrnehmbar zu machen. Dazu bedarf es klarer Gedanken, einer resoluten  Sprache und einer am Begriff orientierten  Judenkritik.  Diese muß eingedenk der Talmudlehre: "Die Juden (allein) werden Menschen genannt, die Nichtjuden aber werden nicht Menschen, sondern Vieh genannt"(; vgl. Jebamoth 61a, Kerithoth 6b, 7a), sich auch – wenn es zu wahrhafter Erkenntnis notwendig ist – den Satz von Reinhold Oberlercher zutrauen, daß „Juden keine Menschen sind“ sondern als alt-antikes Volk durch ihre Feindschaft gegen alle Völker auf einer vorsittlichen Stufe stehen geblieben sind (Max Weber). Wenn er wahr ist, wird dieser  Gedanke uns von Alljuda  befreien, ohne daß einem einzigen Juden ein Haar gekrümmt wird.

„Publikumsverträglich“ ist judenverträglich, denn die Juden haben das Publikum so abgerichtet, daß es reflexhaft jede explizite Judenkritik als eine schwere Sünde von sich weist. Das ist der Trick, der es den Juden ermöglicht,  im Hintergrund zu bleiben, d.h. sich der Wahrnehmung ihres Wesens zu entziehen.

Erst die intensivere Beschäftigung mit dem Judentum, zu der ich durch den Berliner Judaismus-Prozeß gezwungen war, hat mir die Augen für das Wesen des Marxschen Werkes über das Kapital geöffnet. Marx  hat den Systemgedanken (das Denken des Ganzen) , wie wir ihn bei Hegel als Begriff des Geistes entwickelt finden, materialistisch mumifiziert,  den Volks- und Staatsbegriff  entseelt und die technische Seite der Lebenserhaltung als ein Auto dargestellt, das ohne Chauffeur ziellos durch die Gegend fährt.

Im Fleischhauer-Gutachten aus dem  Berner Prozeß um die Echtheit der „Protokolle der Weisen von Zion“ habe ich Anhaltspunkte für die Annahme gefunden, daß Marx  in seiner Pariser Zeit sich im Kreise der Gründer der ersten Jüdischen Weltorganisation, der „Alliance Israélite Universelle“ bewegte und sich  die Aufgabe gestellt hatte, angesichts des Elends der vom Frühindustrialismus gebeutelten Völker die Aufmerksamkeit von Alljuda abzulenken, den Gegensatz von Lohnarbeit und Kapital innerhalb der bürgerlichen Klasse zum Bürgerkrieg zu steigern mit dem Ziel, die Kaiser zu stürzen, die Nationalstaaten revolutionär zu zerschlagen  und den Jüdischen Welt“staat“ propagandistisch vorzubereiten. Dieses Programm läßt sich schon in seinem Essay „Zur Judenfrage“ – im  Jahre 1843 in Paris (!) entstanden – nachweisen.

Müntefering und Deutsches Kolleg stehen neuerdings in einer Front, um der verschleiernden „Kapitalismuskritik“ einen zweiten Frühling zu schenken.

Der „Macher“ der Russischen Oktoberrevolution, Leo Trotzki, stellte sich selbst als die Verleiblichung dieses Programms dar.  In seinem in der Schweiz erschienen Buche „Krieg und Internationale“ schreibt er, daß es sich ihm vor allem um die „Zertrümmerung des nationalen Staates als eines selbständigen Wirtschaftsgebietes“ und „um die Schaffung eines weit mächtigeren und widerstandsfähigeren Vaterlandes – um die republikanischen Vereinigten Staaten Europas als Fundament der Vereinigten Staaten der Welt“ handele.

Das Ziel dieses bolschewistischen Juden, die Beseitigung der nationalen Staaten und Grenzen, ist das gleiche, wie das Ziel der Alliance Israélite Universelle.

Es darf auch nicht länger übersehen werden, daß der 1. Völkermord des 20. Jahrhunderts auf europäischem Boden, der  30 Millionen Russen das Leben gekostet hat,  in alttestamentarischer Tradition von den marxistischen Juden organisiert worden ist, die 1917 in das Zarenreich eingefallen waren.

Weltgeschichtliche Ereignisse dieser Art brauen sich nicht zufällig zusammen, sondern sind Ausdruck eines Ringens gegensätzlicher Momente des Weltgeistes selbst. Bis heute hat sich offensichtlich noch niemand ernsthaft mit der Frage beschäftig, wie es zu erklären ist, daß den kommunistischen „Menschheitsbeglückern“ die Menschenschlachtung so flutschig  von der Hand ging. Das atheistische Marxsche Theoriengebäude und die von den Bolschewisten gelegte Blutspur tragen die Signatur des Jüdischen Geistes, der sich – kraft jahwistischer Ermächtigung -  über alle nicht-jüdischen Völker erzürnt und sie der Schlachtung zuführt. Dieser Geist hat die Afrikanisierung des Abendlandes auf höherer Stufenleiter eingeläutet. Es wird Zeit, daß wir ihm das Schlachtemesser aus der Hand schlagen.

Mit reichstreuen Grüßen

Horst Mahler


Von: thyd@netcologne.de [mailto:thyd@netcologne.de]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2005 23:45
An: 'Horst Mahler'
Betreff: AW: AW: [deutscheskolleg] DK-Erklärung zum 1. Mai 2

Lieber Herr Mahler,

ich sehe in der (wohl Oberlercher’schen) DK-Erklärung und Ihrer Kritik dazu keinerlei wesentlichen Widerspruch.

Implizit ist die Kritik an der Judenherrschaft in der DK-Erklärung enthalten. Diese ist nur nicht in den Vordergrund gerückt, sondern vermutlich publikumsverträglich verpackt. Eine andere Seite der Medallie sozusagen.

Stürzt die Demokratie durch die Verwirklichung der selbstbewussten Volksgemeinschaft, stürzt die diese begründende Judenherrschaft.

Die Kluft, besser den qualitativen Unterschied, sehe ich im Ansatz. Ihrer ist mehr der angewandt-metaphysische Ansatz, der von RO ist mehr der theoretisch-sozioökonomische Ansatz.

M.E. gründet beides im Gleichen und läuft beides auf das Gleiche, die verfassungsgebende Volksversammlung hinaus.

Mit reichstreuen Grüßen

Martin Honold

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Horst Mahler [mailto:hm@horst-mahler.de]
Gesendet: Freitag, 29. April 2005 11:41
An: deutscheskolleg@yahoogroups.de
Betreff: [Norton AntiSpam] AW: [deutscheskolleg] DK-Erklärung zum 1. Mai 20

 Wer über den Internationalen Juden (Alljuda) nicht reden will, der sollte über Kapitalismus und Demokratie schweigen. Denn Demokratie ist Judenherrschaft. Die Emanzipation der Menschheit vom Judentum (Karl Marx) und damit von der Demokratie geschieht durch die Aufrichtung der Selbstherrschaft  (= Freiheit) als selbstbewußte Volksgemeinschaft, die der Staat als Führerstaat ist. Dieser ist nichts anderes,  aber mehr als Nationalsozialismus. Weil das die Wahrheit ist, die sich durchsetzt, kam es zum 8. Mai 1945. Dieser  war die notwendige Niederlage der 1. Negation der Judenherrschaft. Diese alte, jetzt zum Untergang verurteilte Formation hatte sich durch das Erstarken des Deutschen Volkes als ihres Todfeindes noch einmal zu einer heilsgeschichtlichen Kraftanstrengung aufraffen können, um die sich in Wirklichkeit zeigende Zukunft der Völker noch einmal niederzuschlagen. Der Niederlage folgt jetzt die Auferstehung, d.i. die Negation der Negation (2. Negation = Affirmation) als  endgültiger Sieg der Verantwortungsgesellschaft, deren Vorschein der historische Nationalsozialismus unter Adolf Hitler als bewußte Volksgemeinschaft war. Die jetzt sich verwirklichende höhere Stufe dieser Entwicklung ist die selbstbewußte Volksgemeinschaft, die sich als Dasein Gottes weiß.

Kleinmachnow am 29. April 2005

Horst Mahler

_____________________________________________
Von: deutscheskolleg@yahoogroups.de [mailto:deutscheskolleg@yahoogroups.de]
Im Auftrag von Dr. Reinhold Oberlercher
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. April 2005 23:56
An: Deutsches Kolleg
Betreff: [deutscheskolleg] DK-Erklärung zum 1. Mai 2005

DK-Erklärung

zum 1. Mai 2005

 

Die demographische Katastrophe des demokratischen Systems

 

Die demographische Katastrophe ist eingetreten. Selbst der Wunsch nach Kindern ist in Mitteleuropa auf durchschnittlich anderthalb Kind (1,52) geschrumpft, ganz zu schweigen von der tatsächlichen, ständig sinkenden Geburtenrate. Die katastrophale Demographie des Deutschen Volkes - lange Zeit ein Monopolthema der extremen politischen Rechten - hat sich erst kürzlich, mit der Gewalt kollabierender Sozialkassen, den Zugang zum Diskurs der Demokraten erzwungen.

Ursache der demographischen Katastrophe ist das demokratische System. Das demokratische System ist die politische Erscheinung des kapitalistischen Systems. Demokratie ist: Herrschaft über allerlei Leute mit deren Zustimmung in Vertrags- oder Wahlform. In der Verkehrssphäre erscheint dies als ein Geschäft unter Gleichen, in der Erfüllungssphäre jedoch stellt es sich als ein Tatbestand von höchster Ungleichheit heraus und der Kern einer jeden Herrschaft, auch der demokratischen, erscheint, nämlich das Verhältnis von Befehl und Gehorsam. Wer befiehlt, ist der Herr, wer ihm gehorcht, sein Knecht. In der Demokratie ist der Herr der Demokrat und der Knecht der Demokratisierte. Der Knecht ist notwendigerweise der Anti-Demokrat, der Herr der Gegen-Demokratisierte. Für die Demokratie aber sind beide, denn sie ist ihr besonderes Herr-Knecht-Verhältnis, dem sie ihr soziales Dasein verdanken. Wer weder Herr noch Knecht, weder Demokrat noch Demokratisierter sein will, der wird zur Gefahr für die Demokratie.

Gefahr für die Demokratie ist Gefahr für den Kapitalismus. Das marktwirtschaftliche Analogon der Demokratie ist das Humankapital, also die Verwandlung von Geld in Arbeitskraft, die Ausbeutung der Arbeitskraft in der Produktion von Gütern und Diensten und deren Realisierung in mehr Geld. Diesem Mehrwert des kapitalistischen Prozesses entspricht der Machtzuwachs des demokratischen Prozesses. Die Enteignung der Volksmassen von den ökonomischen Produktionsmitteln und den politischen Sachmitteln (sachlichen Verwaltungsmitteln) ist Voraussetzung und ein identischer Vorgang, der lediglich doppelt beschrieben wird: in ökonomischer und in politischer Sprache.

Die bürgerliche Gesellschaft in ihrer Zuspitzung als kapitalistisches System ist bei allem Reichtum nicht in der Lage, die laufende Erzeugung des Elends zu begrenzen. Friedrich Engels hat die marxistische Verelendungsthese dahingehend modifiziert, daß langfristig wohl nicht der Verbrauch von Gütern pro Kopf zurückgehen, sondern die Unsicherheit der Existenz wachsen werde. Nicht nur letzteres ist eingetreten, nicht nur die Wertverelendung (bei wachsendem Güterverbrauch) hat auch in den langen Wachstumsphasen des Gesamtkapitals in den proletarischen Volksmassen ununterbrochen gewirkt, sondern in der jetzigen Reifestagnation der kapitalistischen Produktionsweise greift auch wieder Güterverelendung (sinkender Güterverbrauch pro Kopf) um sich.

Der Kapitalismus ist in das Endstadium der absoluten Verelendung eingetreten. Absolut ist die systeminduzierte Verelendung dann, wenn nicht mehr nur am Güteraufwand pro daseiender Arbeitskraft gespart werden muß, sondern an der Zahl der ins Dasein zu setzenden Arbeitskräfte selber, somit deren Sterberate dauernd über ihrer Geburtsrate liegt. Die Reife des Kapitalismus ist der schleichende Tod der Völker in Gestalt aussterbender Arbeitskräfte.

Wer über Kapitalismus und die von ihm verursachte absolute Verelendung nicht reden will, der soll über Demographie schweigen und sich schämen. Die demographische Katastrophe ist eingetreten, die des demokratischen Systems ist absehbar. Der vollendete Sieg des demokratisch-kapitalistischen Systems hat seine charakteristischen Spuren hinterlassen:

-       die Verwüstung der Welt zu ununterscheidbaren Herstellungs- und Vermarktungsräumen;

-       die Entsittlichung der Völker zu bloßen Bevölkerungen durch Verausländerung aller ehemals homogenen Siedlungsräume;

-       die Daseinsverfehlung der Frauen wie der Männer durch die ohne einen Rest von Selbstverachtung zum Ideal erhobene proletarische Existenz, bei immer häufigerem Absturz selbst qualifizierter Arbeitskraft in das arbeitslose subproletarische Dasein;

-       den Tod der Kinder, das Verschwundensein der kinderreichen Familien als gewünschtes und normalerweise erreichtes Ideal und wahrer Menschenreichtum.

Der Staat will zwar nicht die Verelendung, weder die relative noch die absolute, ist als proletarischer Staat aber Knecht des Kapitals und kein freier Mann. Das Kapital hat den Staat seinem Interesse verknechtet und ihn zum staatverschuldungsdienlichen Steuerstaat und zum krankenschwesterhaften Sozialstaat verformt, was die innenpolitische Erpreßbarkeit des Staates durch das Kapital vervielfacht hat.

Wer die Demokratie - dem Deutschen Volke ein Fremdwort und eine Fremdherrschaft gleichermaßen - nicht durch die Gewalt der Verfassungsgebung hinwegfegen will, braucht mit der Kapitalismuskritik erst gar nicht zu beginnen und hat vom demographischen Problem, der Wahrung und Mehrung des Deutschen Volkes, gänzlich zu schweigen.

post@deutsches-kolleg.org

www.deutsches-kolleg.org

 

 

4. Professor Robert FAURISSON


Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 5:29 AM
Subject: Andrea Carancini

 

I recently caught Andrea Carancini red handed in his dishonesty and I had to warn an Italian publication about it.

So there you have his petty vengeance and, by the way, one more dishonesty.

He is twisting my words and got it all wrong.

In my 2002 booklet (Le Révisionnisme de Pie XII) I clearly stated that Pius XII was against Stalin and Hitler but that, at one point, having, in the summer and in the fall of 1941, to choose between both, he chose to help Roosevelt in his preparation of a most probable war against Hitler. The documentary evidence is to be found in Actes et documents du Saint Siège relatifs à la seconde guerre mondiale, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, vol. 5 [1967], especially on p. 13-26 for a summary; for the references to the documents, as reproduced in this volume, see the footnotes. Four people authored the publication of the 12 volumes of those ADSS. Among them, Pierre Blet, still alive, who, in 1997, published a remarkable 342 p. summary, Pie XII et la Seconde Guerre mondiale d'après les archives du Vatican, Paris, Librairie académique Perrin.

Before the war, in 1937, Pius XI had clearly stated in the encyclical letter Divini Redemptoris that Communism was intrinsically perverse and that no Catholic could collaborate in any way with it. Therefore it was difficult for Pius XII to say in 1941 that it was nevertheless possible for a Catholic to back Roosevelt's policy towards Stalin. Roosevelt wanted already in the summer of 1941 to extend the benefit of the Lend Lease Act (March 1941) to the Soviet Union; this meant he wanted to deliver goods and armament to Stalin, which he did.

So the Pope had to find a way. On September 20, 1941, his "right hand man", State Secretary Mgr Tardini, permitted Mgr Cicognani, Vatican's representative in Washington, to discretely receive Mgr Nicholas, Cincinnati's archbishop, and to tell him that the Pope had condemned communism but not the Russian people and that consequently it was OK to have Soviet Union benefiting from the Lend-Lease Act. On October 14, Nicholas was received by Cicognani who asked him to make a public statement in that sense. And, accordingly, this is what Nicholas did in a pastoral letter. Then, later on, in December 1941, with Pearl Harbour and the automatic entering of Germany into the war, the whole problem was solved for Roosevelt and the Pope (ADSS, vol. 5, p.13-26 under the heading "Pie XII et la politique de Roosevelt").

The four publishers of the ADSS conclude by these words: "We are obliged to state that [Pope Pacelli] made his State Secretary [Tardini] and the American hierarchy to speak as if he had admitted with Roosevelt that Hitlerism was the most dangerous enemy, of which only a military victory could get the better, a victory obtained even with the support of Soviet Union" (ADSS, vol. 5, p. 25-26).

That was not "the central thesis" of my 121 p. - booklet. As indicated by the title, the central thesis was that Pius XII was more than sceptical about the rumours during the war of an extermination of the European Jews by Hitler ; there had been a specific revisionism à la Pie XII . The short section where I discuss the matter of the Pope's choice between Hiler and Stalin occupies less than three pages (p. 36-38).

Robert Faurisson
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
From Andrea ("Alessandro") Carancini
Date : Sat, 7 May 2005 15:07:41 +0200
Objet : a wrong thesis...

dear sirs,
some time ago prof. faurisson wrote a publication about Pope Pius XII (Le révisionnisme de Pie XII).
the central thesis of the book is that Pope Pius XII, between Hitler and Stalin, choosed Stalin.
this is wrong.
at the end of his work faurisson quote, among the "recommandations bibliographiques", the 12 volumes of "Actes et documents du Saint-Siège". did he read them?
i doubt it, otherwise he wouldn't have told that the Pope "manquait à l'effort d'impartialité qu'il s'était, dit-il, toujours imposé".
furthermore faurisson didn't read the very accurate book of Paul Duclos ("Le Vatican et La Seconde Guerre Mondiale", in which the vatican neutrality is demonstrated so well).
faurisson, then, ignore that in 1942 Pope Pius XII released the first two parts of the Fatima's secret (those concerning the russian menace against the world): this fact alone would be sufficient to demonstrate that the Pope refused to be involved in the "antinazi" crusade performed by the allies..
prof. faurisson indeed based his work only about secondary sources, like the book of father blet: a plain error for a revisionist.
regards,
andrea carancini

 

 

5. Germany has no Peace Treaty with the Allies - and thus, after 60 years, is still an occupied country.
--------------
 
Conquered Reich - No legal existence - What surrender means.
 

London May 8th 1945

 

"The German Reich ceases its legal existence at midnight tonight and its government will become a subjugated, conquered and occupied country without further independent existence. 

 

All German leaders are now in the same category as war prisoners. 

 

All German property, possessions or credit in foreign countries are automatically transferred to the account of the central allied control commission which begins to function immediately.  

 

There is no armistice as in 1918, for which reason from midnight the whole of the German manpower and military and private property is at the disposal of the allies.

 

Article in West Australian 5 May 2005

 

-------------------------------and then the plunder of Germany began, and the lies of the Holocaust began, reaching a fever pitch on 8 May 2005--------------------------------

 

Then view WWW.adelaideinstitute.org

 

Go to - Reports

 

Go to - 8 May 2005

 

=================then, from Paul von Stroheim Filmer9@aol.com , view the film clip that states 300,000, all nationalities, died at Auschwitz.

 

Had it not been for Ernst Zündel's 1988 Toronto Holocaust Trial, then the 4 million death figure of Auschwitz would have still stood as a fact.

 

It was during this trial that the 4 million figure was demolished - and 20 plaques on which the 4 million figure was engraved had to be removed.

 

A few years later the plaques re-appeared and the former official 4 million figure was reduced to 1 - 1.5 million deaths.

 

However, the total 6 million figure did not change because that is a religious number for Jews, and so it remains fixed for eternity - so they hope.

 

The unofficial death figure now hovers around 300,000.

 

Professor Robert Faurisson's challenge also remains unfulfilled: "Show me or draw me the homicidal gas chamber".

 

Professor Faurisson is still waiting. To date no-one has succeeded in showing to the world the gas chambers at Auschwitz.

 

What has been achieved through legal persecution is a witch-hunt of those Revisionists who refuse to believe in the gas chambers-Holocaust.

 

David Irving believes in "limited gassings" in the two non-existent farm houses. This disqualifies him as a Revisionist.

 

Others believe in mobile gassing vans -

 

Still others dare not open their mouths because they have a court gag order that prevents them from speaking openly about such matters.

 

Were they to speak out and express their disbelief in these huge chemical slaughterhouses called homicidal gas chambers, then they would be in contempt of court - a criminal matter usually rewarded with three months in prison.

 

Happy 8 May

 

Dr Fredrick Töben

Adelaide Institute

 

 

6. Romanian MPs pass bill introducing jail terms for Holocaust revisionism

Published: 5/5/2005
 

BUCHAREST - The upper house of the Romanian parliament on Thursday adopted a bill that makes denying the Holocaust a crime punishable with between six months to five years in prison.

Lawmakers in the Senate voted overwhelmingly in favour of the bill that was first put to parliament in 2002 but repeatedly delayed as political parties argued about its wording and the length of the prison terms.

It now includes a definition of the Holocaust as "the systematic, state-sanctioned persecution and annihilation of Europe's Jews by Nazi Germany, its allies and collaborators between 1933 and 1945."

The definition was inserted because Romanian politicians have in the past sought to minimise the role of the country, which was an ally of Nazi Germany until changing sides in 1944, in the war-time persecution of Jews.

The former Social-Democrat government sparked outrage in 2003 when it denied that the Holocaust had also been carried out on Romanian soil between 1940 and 1945.

The bill, which still has to be approved by the Chamber of Deputies, also bans racist and xenophobic organisations and symbols, as well as fascist propaganda and an allegiance to "people guilty of crimes against humanity."

The last provision is considered to be aimed at the lingering personality cult around the pro-Nazi war-time premier Ion Antonescu.

He is blamed for the death of 270,000 Romanian Jews during the war but still considered a hero by many for winning back Romanian territory annexed by the Soviet Union in 1940.

 

 


 

7. Paul Fromm


To: cafe@canadafirst.net
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:57 PM
Subject: Free Speech Supporters Protest Zundel's Treatment At German Consulate in Toronto

 

Free Speech Supporters Protest Zundel's Treatment At German Consulate in Toronto

 

Canadian Association for Free Expression

Box 332,

Rexdale, Ontario, M9W 5L3

Ph: 905-897-7221; FAX: 905-277-3914

May 6, 2005

Zundel Protest at German Consulate In Toronto

Representatives of a number of Canadian free speech and German-Canadian organizations  presented serious letters of concern about the treatment of political dissident Ernst Zundel to German Consul General Dr. Klaus Rupprecht at the consulate this morning at 11:00 a.m, Paul Fromm announced from his Rexdale, Ontario office..

            Mr. Fromm heads the Canadian Association for Free Expression. Other groups protesting the imprisonment of Mr. Zundel  include the German World Congress.

            "We see Ernst Zundel as a prisoner of conscience," says Fromm. "He is in prison in Germany under 'investigative detention' solely for the non-violent expression of his political views. This week marks the 60th anniversary of the end of World War II. The new order that emerged after 1945 promised more freedom and democracy," Mr. Fromm points out. "Jailing Mr. Zundel for his non-violent expressions of historical dissent and scepticism is not consistent with democratic tolerance and freedom of expression," he adds.

            "We are asking the Consul to pass on our concerns to Chancellor Schroeder and our demand that Ernst Zundel be freed," Fromm explains.

            "We hope that Guantanamo Bay will never be emulated in Germany and are of the opinion that Mr. Zundel's speedy release would serve to enhance the reputation of Germany as  a free and democratic country," adds Christian Klein who was among the people presenting letters to protest to the Consulate.

            The effort to leave the letters of protest was not without incident. Fromm was confronted by a gangly security guard, as he got off the elevator – not even yet on consulate property. “You have to turn off your cellphone,” the busybody insisted.

            “Why?” Fromm demanded.

            “Security reasons,” the rent-a-cop explained. “I’m only following orders,” he added. [No kidding!]

            “You have to be joking,” Fromm said incredulously. “You mean you think my cellphone is a bomb and I intend to blow my brains out with it.”

            “Well, after 9/11,” the guard concluded, as if that simple mantra justified every intrusion into personal privacy.

 The Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE), [Box 332, Rexdale, ON,. M9W 5L3.] CAFE was founded in 1981 and is Canada's leading advocate for free speech. It has intervened in a number of court cases and human rights tribunals and is especially concerned about government censorship of the Internet. CAFE publishes the monthly Free Speech Monitor.  ($15).

Copies of CAFÉ’s letter and letters from Christian Klein in English and German follow.

 

Canadian Association for Free Expression

Box 332,

Rexdale, Ontario, M9W 5L3

Ph: 905-897-7221; FAX: 905-277-3914

 

Paul Fromm, B.Ed, M.A. Director

 

May 5, 2005

Herr Gerhard Schroeder,

Chancellor,

Federal Republic of Germany,

11012 Berlin,

GERMANY.

                                                 Re: Imprisonment of Ernst Zundel

Your Excellency:

            I am writing to you on behalf of the many Canadians we represent who are concerned about freedom of speech and freedom of thought. Particularly, I want to voice our concern about your country's imprisonment of Ernst Zundel, who lived for many years in Canada.

            A very successful graphic artist in his professional life, Mr. Zundel studied the history of the Twentieth Century and became highly sceptical of the conventional accounts, especially as they related to the treatment of Jews in detention camps in the Third Reich and to German guilt in general. Whether his opinions are valid or not is immaterial. The UN Declaration of human rights enshrines freedom of thought and expression and freedom of speech as among man's most basic rights.

            As you must know, Mr. Zundel, a German citizen, was extradited to Germany on March 2 and has since been in "investigative detention" at Mannheim prison. His political/historical views are under investigation.

            May is an emotion charged time, marking as it does the 6o anniversary of the end of World War II. The order than emerged in 1945 promised a freer more democratic world. Surely, democracy entails freedom of speech and belief.

            Respectfully, we find the incarceration of Mr. Zundel, who has, apparently,  not yet been charged with anything, offensive. Mr. Zundel is a prisoner of conscience -- in prison solely for the non-violent expression of his political/historical opinions.

            We urge your government to release Mr. Zundel and show the world that the new Germany is one that respects freedom of belief and freedom of speech.

            Respectfully, Sir, we ask:

*  Is it true that an arrest warrant was sworn out by the German government on the very day of the Zundel deportation to Canada, even though the statutes of limitation on previous charges for "speech  crimes" had expired?

* Is it true that Ernst Zundel has not yet been charged by the German government, even though he has been in detention in a German prison for almost two months?

* Is it true that the letters of Ingrid Rimland, his wife who is an American citizen,  are withheld from him?

            Looking forward to a response to our concerns, I remain,

 Sincerely yours,

Paul Fromm

cc: Dr. Klaus Rupprecht, Consul General of the Federal Republic of Germany, Suite #1711, 77 Bloor Street, West, Toronto, ON, Canada.

 

The Chancellor

of the Federal Republic of Germany,

Mr. Gerhard Schroeder

11012 Berlin

Germany

 

May 6, 2005

Re.: The incarceration of Mr. Ernst Zündel in Germany

 

Dear Mr. Bundeskanzler,

as a member of the so-called “survivor Generation” – those that have lived through World War II and who became its victims, it was unavoidable to eventually become interested in the Zuendel-affair, since newspapers and television kept us abreast of it.

From the letters that I enclose you can gather my opinion regarding that matter.

It’s now 50 years since I immigrated to this country. Although my roots are in Silesia,

which is now under Polish rule, I still feel connected to Germany

In Canada I attended the University of Toronto and became a teacher. I taught at four different high schools in this city plus one year in Australia. Being an expellee from my homeland I helped to found an organization for my compatriots, and I am active in five other German-Canadian clubs and societies. I also belong to two Canadian political organizations.

What I relate in my letters also reflects the opinions of the majority of my friends and society members. We are worried about the advancing curtailment of our freedom of speech and our other freedoms in the aftermath of the so-called “9/11” and the war against Iraq. We are glad that Germany did not participate in this war of aggression and hope that your government will be able to resist the plans of the Bush-administration for further wars.

Concerning the incarceration of Ernst Zuendel, we hope that “Guantanamo Bay” will never be emulated in Germany and are of the opinion that his speedy release would serve to enhance the reputation of Germany as a free and democratic country very well.

With best wishes for your continued success,

Sincerely yours,

C. J. Klein   (BPHE, B.ED)

C.c.: Dr. Klaus Rupprecht, Consul General of the Federal Republic of Germany, Toronto   

 

An den

Bundeskanzler

der Bundesrepublik Deutschland,

Herrn Gerhard Schröder

11 012 Berlin

Deutschland

6. Mai 2005

Betr.: Inhaftierung von Herrn Ernst Zündel in Deutschland

Sehr geehrter Herr Bundeskanzler,

als Angehöriger der sogenannten Erlebnisgeneration, also jener, die den zweiten Weltkrieg noch erlebt hat und deren Opfer wurde, konnte es nicht ausbleiben, daß ich 

an der Zündel-Affäre schließlich Anteil nahm – man kam nicht umhin, die Nachrichten darüber in den Tageszeitungen und im Fernsehen zu verfolgen.

Aus beiliegenden Berichten können Sie meine Meinung darüber ersehen. Es sind nun

50 Jahre, seit ich hier eingewandert bin, aber meine Wurzeln sind in Deutschland,

obwohl meine Heimat, Schlesien, sich nun unter polnischer Herrschaft befindet.

Hier habe ich die Universität von Toronto besucht und bin Lehrer geworden. Habe an vier verschiedenen höheren Schulen dieser Metropole unterrichtet, sowie ein Jahr in Australien. Als Heimatvertiebener half ich einen Verein für meine Landsleute zu gründen und bin in weiteren fünf deutshkanadischen Vereinen und Gesellschaften aktiv. Auch gehöre ich zwei kanadischen politischen Organisationen an.

Was ich in meinen Briefen beschreibe, gibt auch die Meinung der meisten meiner Landsleute wieder. Wir machen uns Sorge um die fortschreitende Einschränkung unserer Redefreiheit und aller anderen Freiheiten, die im Zuge des sogenannten “9/11”, sowie des Krieges gegen den Irak immer schärfere Formen annehmen. In diesem Zusammenhang sind wir sehr froh, daß sich Deutschland nicht an diesem Angriffskrieg beteiligt hat und hoffen, daß das es der deutschen Regierung auch weiterhin gelingen möge, sich den kriegerischen Plänen der Bush-Administration zu widersetzen.

Was die Inhaftierung Ernst Zündels betrifft, so hoffen wir, daß “Guantanamo Bay” bei Ihnen nicht Schule macht, und sind der Meinung, daß eine baldigste Freisetzung dem Ruf Deutschlands als ein freies und demokratisches Land am dienlichsten wäre.

Es grüßt in heimatlicher Verbundenheit,  C. J. Klein  (BPHE, B.ED.)

Kopie: Herrn Dr. Klaus Rupprecht, Generalkonsul der Bundesrepublik Deutschland,  in Toronto, Kanada.

 

8. Anti-Wall demonstration

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

10 Israelis Arrested and Beaten at Bil'in Anti-Wall Demonstration

May 6, 2005

Bil'in, Ramallah, West Bank

10 Israeli non-violent peace activists were gassed, arrested, and severely beaten with batons by Israeli soldiers today at an Anti- Wall demonstration in the village of Bil'in west of the West Bank city of Ramallah. Several Palestinian demonstrators were wounded by rubber coated metal bullets. 3 were treated for tear gas inhalation. Arrestee Rabbi Arik Asherman of Rabbis for Human Rights was seen being beaten to the ground after being handcuffed.

Today's demonstrators, including 150 - 200 Palestinians from Bil'in, 70 Israelis from the groups Rabbis for Human Rights, Anarchists Against the Wall, and Gush Shalom, and the International Solidarity Movement, left the village and headed for the path of the Wall being cut through Bil'in's olive fields. They carried signs reading "Stop the Wall", "No to the Wall" in Arabic, Hebrew, and English.

No construction was occurring today on the site, but Israeli soldiers stood guard. As marchers approached the path of the Wall they were told it was a closed military zone and that the demonstration was illegal. As they continued peacefully walking forward they were met immediately by tear gas being fired on them. Soldiers then attacked demonstrators beating the Israelis with wooden batons and arresting them. The soldiers continued beating demonstrators even after being handcuffed.

Sound grenades and rubber coated steel bullets were also fired at the crowd.

Several Palestinians received minor wounds in the head, legs, and stomach.

One person was hit in the head with a tear gas canister. Several demonstrators were also treated for gas inhalation. The 10 arrestees are being held by the police at Givat Ze'ev settlement near Jerusalem and are reported to be currently being released.

Today's demonstration, organized by village residents against the construction of the annexation Wall through their olive groves, is the most recent action in a very active popular campaign against the Wall. Two days ago, Palestinians joined by International and Israeli activists chained themselves to olive trees. 11 were arrested and released.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

10 Israelis Arrested and Beaten at Bil'in Anti-Wall Demonstration

May 6, 2005

Bil'in, Ramallah, West Bank

10 Israeli non-violent peace activists were gassed, arrested, and severely beaten with batons by Israeli soldiers today at an Anti- Wall demonstration in the village of Bil'in west of the West Bank city of Ramallah. Several Palestinian demonstrators were wounded by rubber coated metal bullets. 3 were treated for tear gas inhalation. Arrestee Rabbi Arik Asherman of Rabbis for Human Rights was seen being beaten to the ground after being handcuffed.

Today's demonstrators, including 150 - 200 Palestinians from Bil'in, 70 Israelis from the groups Rabbis for Human Rights, Anarchists Against the Wall, and Gush Shalom, and the International Solidarity Movement, left the village and headed for the path of the Wall being cut through Bil'in's olive fields. They carried signs reading "Stop the Wall", "No to the Wall" in Arabic, Hebrew, and English.

No construction was occurring today on the site, but Israeli soldiers stood guard. As marchers approached the path of the Wall they were told it was a closed military zone and that the demonstration was illegal. As they continued peacefully walking forward they were met immediately by tear gas being fired on them. Soldiers then attacked demonstrators beating the Israelis with wooden batons and arresting them. The soldiers continued beating demonstrators even after being handcuffed.

Sound grenades and rubber coated steel bullets were also fired at the crowd.

Several Palestinians received minor wounds in the head, legs, and stomach.

One person was hit in the head with a tear gas canister. Several demonstrators were also treated for gas inhalation. The 10 arrestees are being held by the police at Givat Ze'ev settlement near Jerusalem and are reported to be currently being released.

Today's demonstration, organized by village residents against the construction of the annexation Wall through their olive groves, is the most recent action in a very active popular campaign against the Wall. Two days ago, Palestinians joined by International and Israeli activists chained themselves to olive trees. 11 were arrested and released.

Scoop News - http://scoop.co.nz/stories/WO0505/S00144.htm

Top of Page | Home Page

©-free 2005 Adelaide Institute