About Jean-Claude Pressacs capitulation
1) R. Faurisson to Monsignor Williamson (On Fri, Nov
2, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Jean Norton <email@example.com>
friend Michael Hoffman writes: Krah claims that Williamson was
given Pressac's report on the alleged homicidal gas chambers to study
for a year but he failed to do so.
true? It would be piquant to note that you were given a book to read in
which Pressac, in 1989, still put forward an argument that he was to
repudiate six years later, on June 15, 1995, to be precise, writing that
it was good only for the rubbish bins of history (as revealed five
years afterwards by Valιrie Igounet in her Histoire du nιgationnisme
en France, Paris, Seuil, 2000, p. 652).
not like to speak of this with M. Hoffman without knowing beforehand
whether this Krah is telling the truth.
I hope that
you are holding out in the storm. Your opponents, in any case, will have
disgraced themselves for nought.
2) Reply of Mgr Williamson to RF:
about two-fifths of Pressac's magnum opus, and could not be bothered to
read any more. Michael Hoffman's article is basically accurate. I did at
the time study several works on the Holocaust, for instance by
Germar Rudolf, and you may remember I was soon resorting to yourself for
guidance. I had grasped that you were the doyen of
Revisionists, and -- pardon me -- the most reliable. Even
now I beg you to stay with us, as you also know! I hope there will
be no nasty sequels of your hospitalization.
worry about my expulsion from the SSPX. The parallels with Vatican
II are unending. For instance Mgr Lefebvre said at his own
excommunication; They cannot throw me out of the Conciliar
Church because I never belonged to it.
He was a
very great man, but the neo-SSPX spurns him, except as a mascot.
know if you need any more information.
wishes, and blessings,
3) Note of thanks from RF to Mgr Williamson:
Thank you indeed,
Monsignor, for the detailed answer. It seems to me that whenever we
write Pressacs name we should recall his capitulation of June 15,
1995, a result of the public humiliation that I dealt him in the
seventeenth chamber of the Paris Criminal Court, through the
intermediary of barrister Eric Delcroix, on May 9 of the same year.
Those present in the courtroom could note the poor wretchs utter
inability to show, describe, or explain the magic gas chambers of
Auschwitz for us. As for me, seated where I was at the foot of the
judges dais, I did not let him escape my gaze and so saw the tears
well up in his eyes when, arms raised towards the sky, he said to
presiding judge Martine Ract-Madoux: Madam, you must understand:
Im alone in my struggle. The revisionists should make it their
duty to redress their long silence on this spectacular victory and on
the fact that the exterminationists, at their end, kept this
capitulation hidden for five years.
In my trophy room for
the biggest peddlers of one of historys greatest lies, I have
PUBLICLY mounted, with the help of two lawyers (Doug Christie and Eric
Delcroix), the heads of Lιon Poliakov, Raul Hilberg, Rudolf Vrba,
Pierre Vidal-Naquet, Georges Wellers, Jean-Claude Pressac,
Robert Badinter and a few other lesser individuals.
Do forgive me
these reminders. The hour of reckoning is approaching, alas, for me.
Yours respectfully, RF
©-free 2012 Adelaide Institute