From: Amy Aremia AAREMIA@nc.rr.com

Time to fight back

 Re: The  Executive Committee of Australia Jews asks Attorney General to streamline racial vilification---

 

      Back in August 18, 2009,  Steven Lewis and Peter Wertheim wrote Freedom of Speech should not be freedom to vilify. Although it has its certain merits; however, when it comes to those who question or deny the Holocaust, the word is grossly overused…denying freedom to those who question.  Instead of debating the issue, these people are vilified and their good character is assassinated by instilling and reading into what the Jews twist to believe the questioners had written. To the average reader the questions do not sound offensive, racial hatred, racist or anti-Semitic but are logical questions when one considers that a Holocaust did not occur as such, for the killings not only included Jews.

Pulling a “Holocaust” out of World War II, is, in itself, a racist act, ignoring millions of other minority or ethnic groups who met the same death. To question the Holocaust did not occur, or that there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz, that Jewish people who believed in the Holocaust have exaggerated the number of Jews killed during World War II to profit from what he described as "a Holocaust myth," are reasonable, not racist, anti-Semitic, or hatred.  Many facts and stories were later proven wrong, or actually did not happen- even the 6 million supposedly killed had been reduced to a little over one million.

The floods of publicity for the alleged Jewish holocaust has never ceased, and seem totally out of balance when compared with the immoral silence about the Christian Holocaust in Bolshevik Russia, the Chinese massacre of nearly 80 million.. And now, Israel and the Zionists have made a criminal offense for anyone to inquire or to seek answers to this era of history---their Hate Crime Law, which they have become the biggest offenders of.

Even if the 6 million dead is correct, why is it that millions of words, dozens of books and movies, and oceans of tears have been poured on that one event, while nothing has been done to enshrine and memorialize the horrors of the methodical slaughter of 17 million Christians by Russian Bolshevik leaders, and top secret police officers, many of whom were "Jewish?"  Are not 17 million Christians worth the same moralization and sorrow as the alleged 6 million Jews? 

There never was a storm of protest when "Heads of States" wined and dined with some of the very men of the Soviet Union who played roles in the Christian Holocaust.  Why?  Why is Germany made to suffer guilt and continue to pay and pay for a "war crime" after all these years? And finally, why haven't the allies signed a peace treaty with the Germans after more than 64 years, while keeping an army of occupation at great cost, all these years in Germany?

Why isn't there a memorial, also, in Washington, D.C. to the Christian holocaust?  Why is there not one in Russia?  Why are there no required courses in schools on this tragedy, as one on the Jewish Holocaust is being made mandatory?  This is not an attack on the Jewish people; it is seeking to bring before the world's conscience the greater crime of murder of far more Christians than that of any number of Jews who died in the "Jewish Holocaust."  Why are these questions not put before the courts and the major news media to answer?? 

 No Christian, or other public affairs groups have ever made criminal charges against the public vilifying of Jesus Christ by Jews from the time they insisted that the Romans crucify him….No non-Jewish groups have ever taken to court Menacheim Begin who made a speech to the Knesset (the Israeli Parliament) that was published in The New Statesman in June 25, 1982. when he said: “Our race is the master race. We are divine gods on this earth. We are different from the inferior races as they are from insects---other races compare to us as human excrement.”

Neither did any group speak out against Golda Meir, who was Israel’s Prime Minister in 1969 when she said: “There is no such thing as a Palestine people. It is not as if we came and threw them out and took there country.  They did not exist.”  For more than 60 years they have been wiping out the Palestines whom she claimed did not exist. (Is not a denial of an ethnic group an act of racism and hate?)

 Like all freedoms, the proper limits of free speech are exceeded when it is about causing physical and mental harm or monetary loss.... But harm has to be proved according to objective criteria. The questions raised by the historian/revisionists were never debated, or proved wrong or harmful …simply questions of a “genuine academic group seeking clearer facts and scientific debate. The real thrust that such questions are to use the internet to stoke up hatred against Jews as a group, is an unproven statement that has never been clarified or actually been part of a genuine debate about history, but only distorted politics.

"It is the Jews who originated biblical exegesis (a critical analysis of the Bible), just as they were the first to criticize the forms and doctrines of Christianity...Truly has Darmesteter written: 'The Jew was the apostle of unbelief, and every revolt of mind originated with him.'" (Bernard Lazare, Antisemitism: It's History and Causes, London: Britons Publishing Co., 1967, pp. 149-151).

The Anti-Defamation League, the Jewish Congress, and many other Jewish organizations are “watchdog groups” around the world, seeking to condemn anyone for any statements that can be twisted into a “Hate Crime,” turning people into “criminals” and having them imprisoned. History shows that ever since “Jews” were finally dispersed from the promised land of Milk and Honey by their God for not obeying his commandments, they have sought revenge wherever they migrated, and not assimilated. “The Jews claim to be the torchbearers of civilization, but through their parasitic habits have deteriorated or destroyed every nation in which they have existed in  large numbers.”  (Charles A. Weisman, Who is Esau-Edom? –p 28)  

"Ever since the Jews invented the libel charge of 'anti-Semitism' in the 1880s.  It was first printed in the Jewish Encyclopedia,(1901 Vol. I , p. 641), and has been built up with Jewish money, organizations, propaganda, and lies (such as the Holocaust- Holohoax), so that now the word is like snake venom which paralyzes one's nervous system. Even the mention of the word 'Jew' is shunned unless used in a most favorable and positive context." (Charles A. Weisman, Who is Esau-Edom? - p. 63).

There is no concerted effort by any group to fight free speech vilifying non-Jewish races, or ethnic groups by their smears and gross insults. While there is still some freedom of speech, the world needs to counter the Jewish influence that is being inflicted through this “Hate Crime Law” being foisted upon the governments of still independent nations, and superceding the United Nations Resolutions. 

Considering that one of the basic principles of the Charter of the United Nations is that of the dignity and equality inherent in all human beings, and that all Member States have pledged themselves to take joint and separate action in co-operation with the Organization to promote and encourage universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion, that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenants on Human Rights proclaim the principles of non-discrimination and equality before the law and the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief,

Considering that the disregard and infringement of human rights and fundamental freedoms, in particular of the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or

whatever belief, have brought, directly or indirectly, wars and great suffering to mankind, especially where they serve as a means of foreign interference in the

internal affairs of other States and amount to kindling hatred between peoples and nations, that it is essential to promote understanding, tolerance and respect in

matters relating to freedom of religion and belief and to ensure that the use of religion or belief for ends inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, other relevant instruments of the United Nations and the purposes and principles of the present Declaration is inadmissible,

Convinced that freedom of religion and belief should also contribute to the attainment of the goals of world peace, social justice and friendship among peoples and to the elimination of ideologies or practices of colonialism and racial discrimination as based on This Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief:

Article 1

1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have a religion or whatever belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practices and teaching.

2. No one shall be subject to coercion, which would impair his freedom to have a religion or belief of his choice.

Article 3

Discrimination between human being on the grounds of religion or belief constitutes an affront to human dignity and a disavowal of the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and shall be condemned as a violation of the human rights and fundamental freedoms proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and enunciated in detail in the International Covenants on Human Rights, and as an obstacle to friendly and peaceful relations between nations.

This makes no need for the "Hate Crime Law" that has been instigated by the Jewish organizations, and being foisted on individual nations to supercede the UN and their own government laws... such a law will, and can only encourage more hatred.

 

 

 

©-free 2009 Adelaide Institute