|
|
|
Psychopathic Personality
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fredrick Toben" <info@adelaideinstitute.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:36 PM
Subject: Happy Revisionists:Letter from Sunny California
![]()
NB: Happy Revisionists think with their mind and feel with their heart,
where the hand and the mind work as one to lovingly pursue the search for
Truth. The physical world is accepted as a reality and not as something to be
discussed away and labelled an illusion.
![]()
It was a surprise to land at Tom Bradley/Los Angeles Airport (LAX)
and find that my much-used scarf and overcoat during the past two months
became totally superfluous. California lives up to its name: warm and sunny,
even during winter. No wonder John Steinbeck captured the mood so well
in his The Grapes Of Wrath. So much for playing it by ear and not listening
to the weather reports.
Security at LAX was relaxed Thursday afternoon, but visual absence does not
mean physical absence.
Once settled for the night, that inevitable flick through the countless TV
channels was cut short when we watched something typically Californian: The
Police Chase. For over an hour I followed 'live' a real car chase, a high speed pursuit,
along No 5 Freeway, one of the arterial roads through greater Los Angeles.
The chase was a controlled event with police cars on the road keeping a safe
distance so as not to upset the suspect driver, and a helicopter from above
lighting up the 4WD as the driver sped along at 90 miles per hour through
the San Fernando Valley.
The police had no need to risk the lives of the two children on board
because the suspect driver was on his mobile to either his mother or his
sister, who in turn was in contact with the authorities advising them of his
destination to her home.
When he arrived there, police were waiting for him. The suspect driver let
the children out of the car, then placed his hands on the vehicle, then from
behind an officer tackled him to the ground and another half dozen police
jumped on top for good measure, just like in a rugby match!
Up to the point before the tackle I had thought that US law enforcers had
become civilized, like the lone London Heathrow police officer, whose
presence is enough to influence would-be thugs to think twice before doing
something silly.
It must be said that the suspect driver was certainly a competent driver
who pushed hard along the road, but upon exiting from the freeway he even
observed the various traffic lights.
So much for that item of trivia from LA.
Pictures of a light air plane crash in the LA vicinity with two dead
contrasted with the peaceful resolution of the chase.
Local news featured some person complaining about the "deplorable
conditions" existing in Southern Californian public school toilets. I wonder why
something as basic as cleanliness is a problem here.
Another item claims that a study shows that viagra does not work for women
because they are more complex than men in sexual matters. Have I missed
something all these years?
That reminds me of the David Attenborough documentary about the lion family.
When Mrs Lion needs loving, it is over a 24-hour period, then every
20 minutes Mr Lion has to do his job.
Attenborough shows the couple in that happy mood when his voice-over says:
"But it's not without its danger!" At that moment Mrs Lion looks up at Mr
Lion, then swipes him across the face with her big paw, and Mr Lion yelps like a
little boy and limps away. Such is life.
The new research into what makes a rooster so attractive to his harem of
hens, is also revealing. Certainly the physical attractiveness is a draw card for
the hens, but as in all matters of life, it is not the only factor.
The second attribute that a rooster displays is his gentlemanliness, unlike
the lion who ruthlessly has first go at eating. A rooster will always ensure that his
ladies have the first peck at food.
Then a final attribute is the rooster's ability to protect his hens from danger.
In the experiment a danger scene was simulated where a hawk circled above.
The rooster looked up into the sky, first with one eye, then with the other,
and then let out a danger cry. This brought the whole harem to him. Hens are also rather
short sighted and so this kind of behaviour is important for the whole family.
Now where there is more than one rooster, there is competition for loving,
and the lesser roosters have a harder time at catching their hens. So what some
roosters do is tell lies! They copy the danger sound in the hope that by giving a false
alarm this will bring the hens to them. But hens are smart because they can tell the
difference between a real danger sound and a false one. They don't even react to a
rooster that tells lies!
Is this also the case with individuals who tell lies about, for example, the 'Holocaust'?
Unfortunately there are individuals who have the power to develop and implement laws
that prevent an airing of the truth, where lesser roosters are encouraged to make their
sounds, and are rewarded for it.
Such behaviour breaks down a vital factor within society: trust. Where trust is absent,
truth counts for nothing and lies flourish, and relationships break down, and the control
freaks come in with their damage control that consists mostly of lies.
When on 1 February 2003 NASA's Space Shuttle disintegrated upon re-entry, another US
tragedy was born, and already speculation is running wild that this is symbolic of what
happened on 9/11. It is another internal job to satisfy the Zionist-US plan to guarantee
Israeli supremacy in the Middle East. The fact that the Israeli on board had taken with him
a drawing made by a boy who did not survive Auschwitz, and that this Israeli Defence Force
hero was himself the son of Holocaust survivors, fits neatly into the emerging 'Holocaust' Religion.
However, not mentioned was this man's criminal record that he earned while killing Palestinians.
There is also speculation that this tragedy will work against the US and its role as a proxy for
Israel and its war against Iraq.
The article below, 'Schizophrenic America. Lawyers warn of war
crimes prosecutions against the United States', reminds us of the danger
posed for Revisionists by psychopathic manic depressive individuals who are
about and possibly used by the enemy to undermine Revisionists' moral and
intellectual integrity. There is now a basic understanding of what characteristics
make up such a personality, and I shall list most of them. However, in our quest to be
ruthlessly honest with ourselves - to self-reflect - and not to believe our own
propaganda, we must admit that perhaps we ourselves have at one time or another,
exhibited one or more of those traits. The danger of psychologism is thus evident - it
is not objective reality, and certainly not scientific. I include this matter as
akind of talking point that may,if nothing else, heighten our self-awareness. After all, we
must guard against believing in our own propaganda because that is fatal to us gaining
a sound and healthy grasp of our world view.
Hence, in anything we do, where balance is also a virtue and a leading
principle, we may ask, which Happy Revisionist will cast the first stone at those that
don't like our work?
![]()
Psychopathic Manic Depressives
We all fall under such category at one time or another, so it is said.
However, when out of a dozen traits we find a person possesses more than
half of these characteristics, then it is time to worry.
In the battle of the wills, as is our human lot, such individuals love to
dish it out but can't take it if they then are themselves attacked.
Their hair-trigger temper, the huffing-and-puffing shouting that silences
any opposition, is a legendary device. For the sake of peace, for the sake
of the marriage, the family, work-place harmony, whatever, one withdraws
and remains quiet.
The Revisionists' credibility rests on telling the truth in a civilised
manner, and so the following characteristics don't quite fit into this
pattern:
1.The incessant talker, or motormouth, or machine-gun mouth chatterers.
2. Use of Pseudonyms; use of fake IDs, PO Boxes for correspondence, etc.
3. Feeling of Paranoia - being followed, phone bugged, being talked about
behind their back. All factors may apply because paranoia has been described
as having a heightened sense of reality.
4. The inability to handle money - buying sprees and making huge debts;
credit card companies hate such individuals.
5. Becomes easily verbally abusive -shouts, throws temper tantrums, etc.
6. Nomadic life-style; constantly changes address and usually leave
apartments/houses fully furnished, etc.
7. Need for latest gadgets which excite for a moment, then never to be
looked at again.
8. Never repairs anything and only gets new things that are then thrown
away. Total users of people and has a refined manipulative streak - if you let
yourself be manipulated!
9. Usually imposters, decorate themselves - a sort of make-believe world is
created: smoke andmirrors, etc.
10. Sexually aberrant, any form of sex, and highly sexed. May imply that
they are the rapists, torturers, masochists, and they like to inflict pain on
others - verbal abuse etc. and have own low threshold for pain in the form
of dishing it out but then can't take any form of retaliation.
11. Pathological liars - creating their own reality totally devoid from
reality.
12. They believe they have contact to the highest authorities, dropping of
names, etc; many think they have a direct line to God, or God speaks to them.
13. They cannot sleep - fitful sleepers - sleep deprived.
14. Reckless - in the army there are special camps for these individuals.
15. They are vexatious litigants, cantankerous, vicious and vindictive, etc.
16. There seems a lack of balance, a sense of being incomplete, not properly
wired, flawed.
As I said in my introduction above, upon reflection I can fully relate to
some of these points, especially the final one. I certainly didn't feel
complete when I was young, so the above points are to be regarded with great
caution. One authority on this matter is Dr Robert Hare, 'Without
Conscience', but the rest of the publishing information is lacking. Look it
up in Goooogle, please.
A final point before you read the article below is that this Happy Revisionist wishes to
advise of a forthcoming film that should be a smash hit 'Pirates of the
Caribbean's, scheduled for release in December 2003. I'll be watching out
for this one because the individual who advised me of this had a major role
toplay in it. We shall see whether I struck someone for whom talk is cheap
in the above sense.
America post-911, wailing and rending its garments over the "terrible,
unimaginable loss" of that horrid day, it would be outrageously amusing.
Since 911, it has been virtually impossible to listen to any news broadcast
that does not have at least one item about the casualties of 911, the babies
born into the families of the victims, the terrible loss felt by those left
behind. Now, it is not as though I am saying that such "human interest"
stories are necessarily inappropriate. What is totally beyond comprehension
(to the rational and reasonable) that all the millions (that's right,
millions) of relatives of the millions of casualties (collateral or
otherwise) of US and US policies have no right to similar feelings of
outrage, pain and loss.
From 1945 on, the US has accounted, directly and indirectly, for far and
away more casualties worldwide than all the "axes of evil" and "evil empires" in
the post-WWII period combined. Granted, America has not in every instance
directly massacred all these myriad innocents. However, in addition to the
carnage directly caused by the US the numbers of those who have perished at
the hands of America's "willing executioners" are huge and growing. It is
totally beyond question that American foreign policy has repeatedly and
continually groomed, schooled and supported many of the most repressive
despots, dictators and regimes in the post-WWII world.
America's schizophrenia comes from the fact that, possibly due to its deeply
embedded racism, many if not most Americans believe that they are a species
apart. Occasionally, at least in the minds of the American Anglophiles, this
extends as well to the British (the white, Anglo-Saxon Britons that is) and,
of course, Zionist Israelis. Most Americans are fully convinced of the
innate goodness, generosity and benevolence of their nation and its entire work.
This is merely a sign and symbol of the pitiable dearth of learning and
erudition among average Americans.
Though America arguably has the best post-secondary education money can buy,
the education of most Americans is so terribly narrow that, outside of their
own narrow area of specialization, Americans are morons. Liberal education
(along with just about everything else 'liberal') has become anathema in the
US. As with just about everything else, Americans value only that which can
directly be shown to be monetarily advantageous. Since a wide knowledge base
presents no direct monetary advantage (an erroneous assumption widely
accepted in the US, there is no demand for such education.
That American policies can only be positive and beneficial is taken for
granted by most Americans. That totally ignores the fact that, if the rest
of the world were to take America at its words and emulate (or attempt to)
America's profligate lifestyle, the world economy and ecosystems would
collapse in remarkably short order. On the one hand, the pablum peddled to
the somnambulant American public is that all of our various foreign
interventions, incursions and invasions are undertaken to "spread democracy"
and "American values" worldwide. However, the reality of American foreign
policy is 180° in opposition to its stated aims. Examine the shameful
behavior of the various proconsuls in the UN (American) satrapy of Bosnia.
Yes, by God, we will teach these heathens what democracy is! When we
disapprove of what is broadcast in that satrapy, the proconsul and his UN
bullyboys simply seize or destroy the offending facilities and arrest or
execute the personnel. When an election in that devastated region fails to
produce the proper result, again the proconsul (with the obvious support of
America) simply unilaterally overturns the election results and installs
whatever pro-American quisling it decides is most amenable to American
control and instruction. This is democracy?!?
Another conspicuous example of America's schizophrenia is demonstrated in
America's stance on 'ethnic cleansing' and 'genocide'. Accusations
(baseless) of such 'ethnic cleansing' and 'genocide' formed the basis for America's 79
day gang rape of Yugoslavia. However, ask any American (of course, Native
Americans excluded) how America 'developed' from a fragile strip of 13
Atlantic coast colonies to a continent spanning entity. They will look at
you in moronic bewilderment. When you suggest America itself may be the prime
example in recent times of 'ethnic cleansing' and 'genocide', you will be
verbally (if not physically) attacked, derided as 'anti-American' or, Heaven
forbid, a 'radical'. The fact that American politicians fall all over
themselves to rush to the aid and defense of one of the regimes most
obviously engaged in 'ethnic cleansing' and 'genocide' (Israel), simply does
not seem to register.
This is not to say that genocide and ethnic cleansing should be tolerated or
excused. However, if we are to be consistent and principled, then it is
axiomatic that America is far overdue for a thorough and honest
re-examination of its own history and behavior.
Any such re-examination will be uncomfortable, distressing and disturbing to
American who truly believes in the oft stated principles Americans
repeatedly say they hold dear.
Lawyers warn of war crimes prosecutions
January 25 2003
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/01/25/1042911585741.html
New York: A group of more than 100 legal experts warned President George W
Bush in a letter published today that senior officials could face
prosecution if US soldiers committed warcrimes in Iraq.
The experts said violations of international humanitarian law by US and
allied forces "were extensively documented" during the 1991 Gulf War and
military campaigns in Kosovo in 1999 and in Afghanistan in late 2001.
"Given these past violations, there is a reasonable basis for assuming that
in any future military action against Iraq, these requirements will once
again be breached," they wrote.
The letter, signed by more than 100 law professors and non-governmental
organisations, was also sent to US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld,
British Prime Minister Tony Blair and his Canadian counterpart, Jean Chretien.
Previous violations included "indiscriminate methods of attack," the use of
cluster bombs and fuel-air explosives, and attacks on electricity supplies
and dams, it said.
©-free 2003 Adelaide Institute