Insurgents gain a deadly edge in intelligence
Insurgents gain a deadly edge in
intelligence
Guerrillas have better sources than the
coalition
By John Diamond, Steven Komarow and
Kevin Johnson
11/13/03: USA Today
U.S. forces are losing the intelligence battle in
Iraq to an increasingly organized guerrilla force that uses stealth,
spies and surprise to inflict punishing casualties.
U.S. military, intelligence and law
enforcement officials say that after six months of intensifying
guerrilla warfare, Iraqi insurgents know more about the U.S. and
allied forces -- their style of operations, convoy routes and
vulnerable targets -- than the coalition forces know about them.
Indeed, U.S. intelligence has had trouble simply identifying the enemy
and figuring out how many are Iraqis and how many are foreign
fighters.
With local knowledge and the element of
surprise on their side, the guerrillas are exploiting their
intelligence edge to overcome the coalition's overwhelming military
superiority. Insurgents routinely use inexpensive explosives to
destroy multimillion-dollar assets, including tanks and helicopters.
Using surveillance and inside information, the guerrillas have
assassinated many Iraqis helping the coalition, gunned down a member
of the U.S.-appointed Governing Council, killed the top United Nations
official in Iraq and blasted the heavily guarded hotel in Baghdad
where Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz was staying.
Sophisticated U.S. intelligence tools
such as spy satellites and electronic eavesdropping intercepts have
been of little practical use, according to intelligence officials in
Washington and military officers in Iraq. And despite an intense
search and exhaustive intelligence efforts, deposed leader Saddam
Hussein remains at large.
The key problem is that Iraqi
guerrillas simply have more and better sources than the coalition.
U.S. military officers worry that the Iraqis who work for them, such
as translators, cooks and drivers, include moles who routinely pass
inside information back to insurgents. In at least two cases, Iraqis
have been fired on the suspicion that they were spies.
A former senior director in the Iraqi
intelligence service says the Americans are right to be anxious.''The
intelligence on the Americans is comprehensive and detailed,'' says
the Iraqi, who insisted on not being identified and spoke to a
reporter in a private home rather than at a restaurant or hotel to
avoid being observed. He says guerrillas get detailed reports on what
is going on inside the palace grounds occupied by Paul Bremer, the
chief U.S. civilian administrator, Bremer's staff and the Governing
Council. Again on Tuesday, guerrillas fired mortar rounds into the
''Green Zone,'' a heavily secured area of central Baghdad that
includes Bremer's headquarters.
Attacks on troops, Iraqis
Guerrilla forces have mounted repeated
attacks on U.S. convoys despite frequent changes of route and routine.
One frustrated U.S. commander points out that there are only so many
ways to drive between downtown Baghdad and Baghdad International
Airport, a trip U.S. forces must make and during which they have
frequently been ambushed.
Insurgents have also mounted
devastating attacks after conducting patient surveillance of major
targets such as the U.N. headquarters in Baghdad, the elaborately
secured Al Rasheed Hotel and a military supply train.
And they have identified and in several
cases killed Iraqis helping the coalition. An Iraqi scientist who had
provided confidential assistance to U.S. teams hunting for banned
weapons last summer was gunned down outside his Baghdad apartment,
chief U.S. weapons searcher David Kay told members of Congress last
month. A week ago, an Iraqi security guard working with the Army on
the secure transport of surplus Iraqi munitions answered a knock on
his door and was asked whether he was still helping the Americans. He
answered yes and was fatally shot three times in the chest, according
to Dan Coberly, spokesman for the Army Corps of Engineers.
U.S. intelligence cable traffic between
Baghdad and Washington is rife with warnings about Iraqi employees of
the coalition secretly supplying information to guerrillas, according
to a U.S. intelligence official and a high-ranking defense official.
Coalition authorities suspect that some insider information may have
aided guerrillas in the Aug. 19 bombing of the U.N. headquarters that
killed Sergio Viera de Mello, the top U.N. official in Iraq. The
former Iraqi intelligence official says guerrillas knew that Wolfowitz
was at the Al Rasheed Hotel last week, a closely guarded secret.
''Absolutely they did. In fact, the
sixth and 12th floors were targeted,'' the Iraqi says. Pentagon
officials say they have no evidence the guerrillas knew Wolfowitz was
in the hotel when they launched their rocket barrage Oct. 26.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld says
the coalition will rapidly increase the number of Iraqis serving as
police and joining U.S. forces on military patrols. But he
acknowledges that hurrying Iraqis into security roles increases the
risk that some will be moles working for the other side.
The guerrillas are as skillful at
keeping their secrets out of U.S. hands as they are at collecting
sensitive information about coalition operations. By using rudimentary
security precautions such as avoiding the careless use of cellphones,
guerrillas have kept their attack plans a secret. A series of bombings
last week in Baghdad caught U.S. commanders completely by surprise,
according to two U.S. military sources in Iraq.
A defense intelligence official says
Iraqi guerrillas are sophisticated in covert tradecraft. They
''compartmentalize'' information, so no one operative knows enough to
compromise an operation if caught. They use ''cut-outs,''
intermediaries who protect the identity of operatives and pass
messages. And they plant false information in coalition hands.
Just such a false lead may have led to
the ambush death of a National Guard military policeman, Spc. Richard
Orengo, in Najaf in June. Called to investigate a car theft, Orengo
instead walked into a firefight and was killed.
Coalition struggles
Army Lt. Col. Jim Danna, a unit
commander in Baghdad, says soldiers in Iraq know they can't rely on
complex intelligence devices to fight the Iraqi insurgency.
''The U.S. intelligence community in
general is a technology-based force, designed to fight against a peer
foe,'' such as the Soviet Union, Danna says. But what is going on in
Iraq today ''is a human-based war.'' For troops trying to protect
themselves and the new Iraqi government, the useful information is
''98% human intelligence'' from local sources.
Military intelligence field units have
had some success developing reliable sources, arresting former regime
officials and increasing the volume of viable tips, commanders say.
But they face an Iraqi populace reluctant to help them, whether
because the Iraqis oppose the occupation or fear they'll be killed by
guerrillas if they cooperate.
Intelligence officials say they have
had little success in getting information that would allow them to
thwart attacks. Some tips have turned out to be traps meant to lure
soldiers into ambushes.
''No, we're not satisfied with the
quality or quantity of our intelligence,'' Wolfowitz told National
Public Radio last week. Field commanders now get so many reports from
Iraqi sources that ''sifting out the good from the bad is a real
challenge,'' Wolfowitz said.
At the field headquarters of the 2nd
Brigade of the 1st Infantry Division in downtown Baghdad, intelligence
gathering resembles old-fashioned detective work.
Told that an informant says a Saddam
loyalist wanted for questioning has turned up at a local hotel, Army
Col. Ralph Baker replies, ''Let's pick him up.''
Baker says traditional Army methods are
light on human intelligence. The focus is the battlefield, not the
community. But now, Baker and others say, the only way to win is to
get tips from the same people the Army is working with on sewage
projects, school renovations and the like.
''We call them the silent majority,''
Baker says. ''We were slow getting started,'' he concedes, but today
''we have a tremendous information network.''
'Mission impossible'
While the military wants information
about the location of guerrilla hideouts and coming attacks, the FBI
has a large team in Baghdad trying to find the culprits in recent
rocket and car-bomb attacks.
One official with knowledge of the
investigations says the difficulty of getting reliable intelligence
has made tracking down attackers ''almost mission impossible.'' For
example, Iraq's unreliable telephone system has confounded U.S.
efforts to consistently gain information from the sort of electronic
surveillance that works in U.S. investigations, the official says.
An example of the frustration
experienced by U.S. authorities has been the ongoing FBI investigation
into the U.N. bombing.
Within hours of the blast,
investigators had recovered the vehicle identification number,
manufacturer number and Iraqi license plate attached to the
Russian-made truck used in the bombing. In most countries, the
recovery of just one of those items would have been a coup, tantamount
to a quick and sure resolution.
In the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, the
rear axle of the truck that held the bomb led agents to the Kansas
rental agency where bomber Timothy McVeigh had leased the vehicle.
Parts of the truck used in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing also
linked terror suspects to a rental agency. In Iraq, the gold mine of
vehicle evidence yielded little immediate payoff because Iraqi vehicle
records are in disarray.
Furthermore, continuing combat in
Baghdad means that even on routine forays through the city, FBI agents
must travel with the bureau's hostage rescue team just to ensure the
agents' safety. The heavily armed and visually conspicuous teams get
in the way of conducting clandestine meetings with Iraqi sources.
''It's pretty difficult to get people
to feel comfortable with you when you pull up with a SWAT team,'' the
official says.
Copyright: USA Today.