US admits it used napalm bombs in Iraq
By Andrew Buncombe in Washington
The Independent | 10 August 2003
American pilots dropped the controversial incendiary agent napalm on Iraqi
troops during the advance on Baghdad. The attacks caused massive fireballs
that obliterated several Iraqi positions.
The Pentagon denied using napalm at the time, but Marine pilots and their
commanders have confirmed that they used an upgraded version of the weapon
against dug-in positions. They said napalm, which has a distinctive smell,
was used because of its psychological effect on an enemy.
A 1980 UN convention banned the use against civilian targets of napalm, a
terrifying mixture of jet fuel and polystyrene that sticks to skin as it
burns. The US, which did not sign the treaty, is one of the few countries
that makes use of the weapon. It was employed notoriously against both
civilian and military targets in the Vietnam war.
The upgraded weapon, which uses kerosene rather than petrol, was used in
March and April, when dozens of napalm bombs were dropped near bridges over
the Saddam Canal and the Tigris river, south of Baghdad.
"We napalmed both those [bridge] approaches," said Colonel James Alles,
commander of Marine Air Group 11. "Unfortunately there were people there
... you could see them in the [cockpit] video. They were Iraqi soldiers.
It's no great way to die. The generals love napalm. It has a big
A reporter from the Sydney Morning Herald who witnessed another napalm
attack on 21 March on an Iraqi observation post at Safwan Hill, close to
the Kuwaiti border, wrote the following day: "Safwan Hill went up in a huge
fireball and the observation post was obliterated. 'I pity anyone who is in
there,' a Marine sergeant said. 'We told them to surrender.'"
At the time, the Pentagon insisted the report was untrue. "We completed
destruction of our last batch of napalm on 4 April, 2001," it said.
The revelation that napalm was used in the war against Iraq, while the
Pentagon denied it, has outraged opponents of the war.
"Most of the world understands that napalm and incendiaries are a horrible,
horrible weapon," said Robert Musil, director of the organisation
Physicians for Social Responsibility. "It takes up an awful lot of medical
resources. It creates horrible wounds." Mr Musil said denial of its use
"fits a pattern of deception [by the US administration]".
The Pentagon said it had not tried to deceive. It drew a distinction
between traditional napalm, first invented in 1942, and the weapons dropped
in Iraq, which it calls Mark 77 firebombs. They weigh 510lbs, and consist
of 44lbs of polystyrene-like gel and 63 gallons of jet fuel.
Officials said that if journalists had asked about the firebombs their use
would have been confirmed. A spokesman admitted they were "remarkably
similar" to napalm but said they caused less environmental damage.
But John Pike, director of the military studies group GlobalSecurity.Org,
said: "You can call it something other than napalm but it is still napalm.
It has been reformulated in the sense that they now use a different
petroleum distillate, but that is it. The US is the only country that has
used napalm for a long time. I am not aware of any other country that uses
it." Marines returning from Iraq chose to call the firebombs "napalm".
Mr Musil said the Pentagon's effort to draw a distinction between the
weapons was outrageous. He said: "It's Orwellian. They do not want the
public to know. It's a lie."
In an interview with the San Diego Union-Tribune, Marine Corps Maj-Gen Jim
Amos confirmed that napalm was used on several occasions in the war. <end>
Top of Page | Home Page
©-free 2003 Adelaide Institute