|
|
|
|
The Race Card From Judeo-Nazi to Zionist-lite!
Jewish man arrested over arson at
Paris Jewish centre [The Jewish Question is exhaustively treated at: www.jewishtribalreview.org] During my seven month incarceration in Germany during 1999, I met an Afro-American who scoffed at an inmate's suggestion that he should pull the race-card against the prison wardens so as to get some benefits out of it. Not only did he reject doing such a thing because he considered German prisons to be quite civilized, but he also said that the O J Simpson trial taught him one thing: there is no justice to be had from the US court system. If you have the money, he claimed, then you can buy yourself justice. From its inception in 1994, Adelaide Institute has always insisted that the Jew is not a race. This does not mean that there are individuals who wish to belong to a Jewish race, call themselves Jewish (non-religious, of course), and then seek the protection of some racial discrimination law. But this kind of thinking is categorical confusion - and intellectually unsustainable. Hence the urgency of someone like Jeremy Jones to get a court ruling using a law that his Zionist group authored. The aim has been to enshrine the concept Jew as a racist concept within Australian law. The next category into which those Jews with a racist mindset would like to slip is the category of ethnicity. But as the above, it is intellectually not tenable to insist upon such. The problem with the above analysis is that the Jew belongs to the religion category. Anyone who has travelled through Israel, would have noted the various racial origins/ethnic backgrounds that Jews come from. What holds them together is their religion. When in 1935 Hitler proclaimed the Jew to be a race, he was doing the bidding of the Zionists who had a vision of establishing their own state in Palestine. The Jew category is a religious one, and the Jew clearly belongs to the successors spawned by its own religion - Christianity and Islam! Through her 17 September 2002 Judgment, Justice Catherine Branson has re-activated the 1935 Nürnberg Nazi Race Law that branded the Jew a race. Justice Branson's ruling needs to be tested in a court of law. That was the problem faced by Justice Branson, and by Justice Hely in the Jeremy Jones v Olga Scully case in Launceston. Under the Racial Discrimination Act (RDA), Rules of Evidence are practically suspended! And where a case is run where the accused are not legally represented, then surely no legally sound judgment can emerge. No good precedent law can emerge from such a process. But then cynical minds say that that is exactly the aim of the RDA - to create woolly legal precedent, protecting those Australians who claim to be Jewish. That is not justice! Whenever there is a conflict involving someone who claims to be Jewish, the racial, language, religious —even cultural — categories are often used in an attempt to deflect justified criticism. Individuals with a sound moral framework will, of course, not pull the Jewish-racist card because that would mean they condone such conceptual confusion. 1. The Israel-Arab war: Israel is a national concept, while Arab is a language category. For a long time it was resisted to label the current conflict: Israel-Palestine conflict, instead of the Israel-Arab conflict. 2. When we hear about Arabic/Palestinian citizens in Israel, it is always stressed that these citizens are not Jewish, i.e. not converts or not having a Jewish mother. The latter is a biological-racist category that, however, applies to Black or Indian Jews. 2. Jews and Arabs: Here Jews implies religious identity, while the Arabs here remains a language category. 3. Antisemitic (spelling also antisemitic, anti-Semitic): The term is used by those who call themselves Jewish, as a weapon to deflect scrutiny of their personal behaviour, and to silence any opposition that their untoward behaviour may generate. Anyone who is accused of being an antisemite, can deflect such criticism by merely stating that he does not oppose the Palestinians who are real semitic peoples.
 It must be remembered that the 'Jews' are only as good as the host nation's education system wherein they reside. To this day, many prominent Jews carry German names. It must also be remembered that it is an impossible task to reconcile the Germans and the Jews because here we mix 'racist' and 'religious' categories, though this fact does not prevent some Jews from attempting the impossible, e.g. Prominent Jewish German Michael Friedman. Hence, there is some truth in the statement that the 'Jews' need the 'Germans', but not the reverse. The Germans can do without the Jews. More on this issue, in German, is available from Horst Mahler hm@deutsches-kolleg.org who has called upon the the Jews, including the Zionists, to overcome their limitations and give up the Jew-Goyim divide and become a whole Mensch. Mahler is working on this problem at: http://www.deutsches-kolleg.org/hm/ The attitude that has to be overcome is a somewhat infantile one: to view everything from one's own point-of-view. Such self-centrednes all too often does not accept that there is such a thing as objective reality, objective knowledge. Simply put: The world continues to exist even if human consciousness ceases to exist. In the Jeremy Jones case: He does everything possible to ingratiate himself within the Australian social structure, then feels offended when someone justifiably criticises his behaviour, for example, supporting the sending of money to Israel's outer settlements that are built on Palestinian land. Jones then evokes, as do now US Zionists in academia, that such criticism of Israeli behaviour is pure antisemitism. Unfortunately, the world has seen through this scam of using shut-up words with which to deflect valid criticism of one's own behaviour. See what The Birdman jbryant@intenet.net
has to say on this matter: http://www.thebirdman.org.
From: ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny, October 6, 2002 An internet service called 'Alexa' (http://www.alexa.com/)
has developed some means of evaluating and ranking
websites. Included in this evaluation is a means for
readers to voice their opinions. |
