From Captain Eric May - and more

 

 

Prologue  - Ms. Doran's remarks

 

Heather Van Doran hvandoran@yahoo.ca wrote:

Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 19:19:55 -0400 (EDT)
From: Heather Van Doran hvandoran@yahoo.ca
Subject: Re: AOC Lafayette, La. broadcast: 'CurrentIissues" program contains known untruths

Socialist claptrap for the masses?

 

[A reply to Ms. Doran...]

Dear Ms. Van Doran (et al.),

 

I'm one of the two soldiers in the Current Issues TV "war crimes" edition that has been causing such a ruckus since it appeared last week, especially after a Monday Al-Jazeerah.info article about it. The remarks you make above are quite mild compared to some others I've received.  I've had some "swift-boating" specialists from the Bush League threaten me with death, but settle (I hope) for promising to dredge up whatever they can extract from my military records to discredit me.

 

I vouch for the authenticity of the information I offered Dr. Tillawi, the host of the my interview.  At the link below, you'll find my picture in the top left corner, and by clicking it you'll access the full interview in question.

 

Current Issues TV http://www.currentissues.tv/

 

My military specialties are in intelligence and public affairs, and I know what I'm talking about when I charge that there has been a systematic pattern of media censorship since before the war, that has specialized in covering up just the kind of information that Ghost Troop specializes in putting out through the internet (i.e., real war news).  My portion of the interview is the last thirty minutes of the hour show, and Dr. Tillawi gives a fine introduction of the program's interests and views in his fifteen-minute introduction and update.

 

But it's the fifteen minutes between Dr. Tillawi and me that's causing all the ruckus, I think...

 

 

US Iraq Vet Jesse MacBeth

 

Jesse MacBeth, whose 15-minute interview precedes mine, is a member of Iraq Veterans Against the War..., and a self-confessed war criminal.  He states that the kind of killing that was apparently done in anger in Haditha wasn't singular, or even unusual.  He says that mass execution was being conducted systematically by US Army elements during his service in Iraq, and that it was directed and covered up by higher command.  He gives tactical details of Iraq infantry operations that corroborate his claims.  He is, in short, a credible witness.

 

If we consider MacBeth's allegations to be true, it goes a long way towards explaining a current curiosity in the Haditha matter:  Why isn't it big news in Iraq?  To hear MacBeth tell it, American  atrocities are commonplace, and no one is surprised about Haditha.  The Iraqi non-response is quite a shocking response, when you think about it.

 

I'm inclined to believe Jesse MacBeth was telling the truth about the nature of the operations in which he partook in Iraq.  I was at Camp Casey in the summer of 2005, and was impressed with the sincerity of the Iraq Veterams Against the War.  Like the Vietnam vets of the Vietnam antiwar, they were clearly soldiers, not peaceniks, and they had earned the right to protest the war.  They know plenty of stories, big stories, that aren't getting media coverage, and apparently they are becoming increasingly confident about telling them.

 

In the interview it's easy enough to pick out the guilt MacBeth feels, and will continue to feel forever.  He stepped into a real war, not the propaganda version on TV, and became something couldn't have imagined before the war, and won't be able to forget after the war.

 

War is never simple or easy to the men who are in it, though it often seems that way to the men who send men to it.  With Haditha we'll have another case of the Abu Ghraib phenomenon:  a controlled cycle of quasi-regret and non-admissions by the Bush League and its media enablers, counterbalanced by severe condemnation and punishment for the soldiers at the bottom of the crime.

 

 

Decide for yourself, it's the American way!

 

In a matter of such importance as this, I strongly recommend that each American citizen listen to the interview.  You can make up your own minds about the truth.  There is no one so foolish as to think that the mainstream media tells anything like the truth, so what makes anyone think that the current revelation of Haditha is anything more than a watered-down version of the truth?  Monday, Al-Jazeerah.info published my letter to Dr. Tillawi about the interview and its significance:

 

Al-Jazeerah.info / CPTMAY / Current Issues TV

 

Ms. Doran, thanks for sending this my way so that I'd have a chance to clarify my part of the interview, and offer thoughts on the rest of it.  If Jesse MacBeth's story breaks down, so be it.  I don't jump at the chance to believe the worst things about my brothers and sister GI's in Iraq, but I don't turn away from strong evidence, either.

 

Best regards,

 

Captain Eric H. May, MI/PAO, USA

CO, Ghost Troop, 3/7 Cybercav+

Mission of Conscience / Patriots in Action

 

PS:  For anyone interested in knowing what in particular motivated my "mission of conscience" against Bush in 2003, the "Camp Casey" version of our core Ghost Troop essay is at: 

 http://homepage.mac.com/kaaawa/iblog/C177199123/E20050823090852/.

 

_____________________________________

 

General News

Published: Tuesday, May 30, 2006
Bylined to:
Franz J.T. Lee

Riots break out in southwestern Merida: Chavez' Revolution in immediate and serious danger ... challenging times for Latin America: for Venezuela, Bolivia and Peru...

University of Los Andes (ULA) professor Franz J. T. Lee writes: Riots and 'guarimbas' are running wild in southwestern Merida State, led by the delinquent student leader, United States CIA and "opposition" stooge Nixon Moreno.

Over the past few days, a small group of reactionary students of the University of The Andes, Merida ... with the probable aid of paramilitary forces smuggled into the university from inside the Faculty of Law & Political Science campus, opened fire at police forces guarding the streets, wounding twenty-six policemen ... three very seriously.

At present time, the bloody political carnival continues around the Plaza de Toros (the bull-ring), in front of the faculty, where student "matadores" are using military arms ... shotguns and pistols ... and seem to be well-organized, aided by some university authorities who oppose the Chavez government.

Many buses full of anti-chavistas students from other national universities were detained by security forces in nearby Ejido preventing their arrival to Merida City in destabilization attempts to cause total chaos.

The disturbances have spilled over to the adjacent Faculty of Humanities.  Sporadically the armed conspirators are shooting at the police, or anybody, or anything in red for that matter. The police find  themselves in a defenseless situation, since they are prohibited by law from using firearms at public demonstrations. At any moment, classes could be suspended in the schools, educational institutions and universities throughout the region.

Shakespeare's Juliet had once asked a semantic question: "What is in a name?"

Well, in Venezuelan politics the name of a leader tells the true story: the reactionary student leader in Merida is called Nixon Moreno and his delinquent anti-chavista counterpart in the Caracas student federation is called Stalin Gonzalez!

Hence the alliance of "Nixon and Stalin" against "Les Miserables" (Hugo) against the "Big Dictator."

According to the daily "Ultimas Noticias" (30/05/06), Chavez' special electoral commando is ready for launching to get a possible ten million favorable votes in the December presidential elections ... this is the very last thing that Washington D.C. can afford to happen.

As fake window-dressing, the "opposition" has also named its candidates; among them, Teodoro Petkoff, who has already begun his anti-chavista campaign in Merida. In a press conference at the airport, he caustically launched his diatribal garbage against the "Chavez regime," against the Bolivarian Revolution ... he was fetched and welcomed at the airport by Nixon and cohorts.

The subversive idea is to keep the streets "hot" ... to cause permanent social unrest, and even to try to sabotage the OPEC meeting in Caracas and to discredit the Chavez government in the eyes of the world awaiting the results of the OPEC conference.

All this just to create favorable conditions for US military or paramilitary intervention. In any case, the mastermind behind all these maneuvers is the Bush military regime.

The coming 141th Extraordinary OPEC Conference in Caracas, June 1-3, is already confirmed ... at the same time a number of opposition destabilization plans have been uncovered as being hatched for this week ... this will be a really trying week for Latin America, especially for Venezuela.

Two of the main topics to be discussed at the OPEC venue concern Iran's program for peaceful nuclear energy and possible conversion to the euro as international currency for oil sales.  As we know, Iran may launch its euro-based oil bourse any moment.

A possible cooperation between Russia and OPEC will be discussed with reference to the USA-Iran conflict ... this will be followed by a trip described as a cordial visit to Russia where Chavez and President Putin will discuss matters concerning the future of both nations and mankind itself.

Nevertheless, as I have already explained in previous commentaries, international relations of the world market are already very hot and explosive on the information highway ... what is happening is that an "atomic" economic war is already being declared against the USA and we could expect a bellicose retaliation at any moment too.

  • We should not forget, that Chavez is blamed for the North American economic and energetic fiasco ... but, for the United States of America, time is running out.

Every fleeting second in which a US dollar is converted into an euro, Bush is singing "Nearer My God to Thee!" as his Titanic sinks.

The initial stages of this colossal belligerent preparation for military conquest of Latin America ... especially of Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia and Peru ... are already in the final stages.  CIA destabilization is already exhausted, the dictatorial image of "Chavez the Tyrant" is already cemented in the brains of all the "Friends of Venezuela."

Hence, the planned military attacks may begin soon after the OPEC conference, after the results of the Peruvian elections, Chavez' visit of to Moscow or the launching of the Iranian oil bourse. 

  • There may be multiple attacks against the "axis of evil," ushered in by another Bin Laden "attack."  And this time, it must be a realm big one.

Blowing up the Statue of Liberty will not suffice ... it must be the use of something real big, a convincing pretext for a nuclear war, the use of a biological or chemical weapon of mass destruction in some metropolitan country. The blowing up of an atomic reactor or throwing a pocket atomic bomb in a large industrial city ... in London, Berlin, Los Angeles ... for war criminals who organize hoaxes like 'Pearl Harbor' and the 'Twin Towers' the latter would be sufficient pretext to raze Iran to the ground and to invade Latin America.

This is not shouting Wolf!

We are living in a brutal, heartless world, where power, capital and money reign, we face the eve of yet another severe United States directed military coup against President Chavez. Such situations have occurred manifold over the last seven years ... their early discovery and our warnings in time aborted many a military coup already.

This time, it will not be an easy walk to liberty ... the USA is desperate, is facing total bankruptcy, extinction as a world power. It will defend itself mercilessly at all costs.

Meanwhile, nationwide, the Chavez government is making preparations for self-defense against a possible asymmetric protracted war.  As a result of the current situation in Merida state, the people's reserve army is already called to be on the alert.

On May 29, Venezuela's Minister of Defense, Admiral Orlando Maniglia informed the public that this week the first batch of 33,000 Russian-manufactured rifles and ammunition will arrive, ready to be used for defense purposes ... he also stated that military training against asymmetric war, in which the armed forces and the people will participate, will take place in coastal Vargas  State very soon.

In the meantime, National Assembly deputies Tarek El Aissami and Alberto Castelar have presented video clips and documentary evidence that Teodoro Petkoff and Julio Andres Borges -- pre-candidates in the upcoming presidential elections (December 2006) are implicated in sabotage, acts of violence and destabilization in conjunction with Nixon's student movement ... they have shown videos of the war materials used by the student fifth columnists.

Yes, the Bolivarian Revolution is indeed in serious danger ... both from within and from without ... we face extreme and immediately challenging in Latin America: for Venezuela, Bolivia, Cuba and Peru...

Franz J. T. Lee
franz@vheadline.com 

Franz John Tennyson Lee, Ph. D (University of Frankfurt), Author, Professor Titular & Chairholder of Philosophy and Political Science, University of The Andes, Merida (Venezuela)

http://www.vheadline.com/lee

 

_______________________________________


Confident U.S. generals commit war crimes

Uranium as a force multiplier

by Bob Nichols

This 4-year-old Iraqi boy is suffering from a tumor growing in his eye.

Photo: BBC

It always pays to listen, and to listen exactly, to what the senior U.S. military officials say about fighting wars. In 1991, Gen. Colin Powell sent 500,000 men with Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf, lots of 70-ton Abrams Tanks and other soldier equipment for a 100-hour war against a weak third world country – Iraq. It was called the Powell Doctrine and required a quick enemy defeat by “overwhelming force,” “defined goals” and an “exit strategy.”

Another George Bush, George Bush the second, sent only 145,000 troopers for the much more ambitious conquering and occupation of Iraq 12 years later. What changed?

Why send 355,000 fewer troopers for a much larger, tougher, sure to get you killed job? The American war policies did not change. The answer is that the Americans had millions of pounds of a deadly microscopic “helper” called depleted uranium as a “force multiplier” deployed in Iraq.

A force multiplier is a technological method to multiply the aggressiveness and lethality of an armed force. Dr. Katsuma Yagasaki of Ryukyus University in Okinawa, a physicist, stated publicly that the atomicity equivalent of the weaponized uranium gas deployed in Iraq by U.S. military forces is hundreds of thousands of times the radioactivity of the Nagasaki atomic bomb.

Marion Fulk, who started working on nuclear weapons more than 60 years ago during the Manhattan Project, says, “I would say that it is the perfect weapon for killing lots of people.” A leading scientist, Leuren Moret, speaking out on the use of depleted uranium today, says flatly, “Iraq is uninhabitable,” due to widespread radiation poisoning.

Uranium weapons are criminal violations of international and U.S. federal law in at least four ways. That is exactly what the U.S. military and politicians demanded be used in Iraq and Central Asia. Noted humanitarian and war crimes lawyer Karen Parker gives a simple four point test to determine that DU is illegal and a war crime and a crime against humanity. However, using the four point test as a weapons spec gives the Pentagon the super weapon they wanted. War crimes lawyers, in many ways, wrote the spec for Washington’s latest genocidal wonder weapon.

A weapon that:

  • strays off the field of battle.

  • lasts after the battle is over.

  • causes cancer and other major devastating diseases.

  • causes lethal harm to people and the environment, is an illegal weapon as determined by a U.N. body. In short, its use is a war crime.

DU, or so-called depleted uranium, fits the profile perfectly. The senior American military and political leadership had their super weapon. They then determined that the Iraqi people and others in Central Asia’s resource rich lands were in the way, had no right to live and had to go. They would be nuked by uranium munitions.

The American war planners knew and assumed that the U.S. soldiers were expendable commodities, like bullets. They would be nuked, too. As the famous American secretary of state, His Excellency Henry Kissinger, said, “Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.”

The American expeditionary forces purposefully used a long lasting genocidal weapon, uranium gas, in Iraq to decimate the Iraqi civilization. The Americans are still using this genocidal weapon more than 15 years later. It’s estimated that more than a million Iraqis died during the past 15 years from wars and sanctions. There were only about 24.4 million Iraqis to start with in 1991. The extermination minded American senior politicians and military leaders are nothing if not determined, ruthless and relentless.

As the brutal American Marines say, “Kill their ass and steal their gas.” The American privates and corporals, the so-called grunts, do not know they are included in the soon to be dead or maimed, because poison gas weapons are not controllable. The poison flies everywhere with the changing wind. Poison gas is very unpredictable. The grunts are “throw away soldiers.”

The Pentagon reported 320 tons of deadly, radiation-dispersing weaponized ceramic uranium oxide gas weapons were deployed on the nearly defenseless Iraqis in 1991. Cancers and other diseases soared. Ever since the American atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in August 1945, radiation dispersing uranium weapons have been war crimes and illegal.

Since the Americans are the world’s only “super power,” the world is in a quandary, wondering what to do to stop the Americans? The American generals and senior politicians are addicted to the incredible lethality and force multiplier properties of depleted uranium.

Uranium weapons deliver death and illness in a big way, forever. That makes non-nuclear countries fear the United States. The American politicians love it because they know fear is a great motivator.

Thousands of nuclear missiles remain on hair trigger alert, even today. The lethal nuke birds can fly in 15 minutes. All world leaders know it. Just like that, they could die in a global thermonuclear war in which everybody dies or wishes they were dead.

After the U.S. nuked Japan in 1945 with large depleted uranium bombs wrapped around a tiny core of A-Bomb and H-Bomb devices, it did not take long for the U.S. monopoly on global thermonuclear weapons to evaporate into thin air and for nukes to proliferate like fleas on a dog. As the famed scientist Albert Einstein said, “There are no secrets.” Sure enough, soon Russia, China, France, England, Israel, Pakistan, India and probably others also possessed thermonuclear weapons.

A country has to have a nuclear reactor to start a nuclear weapons program. Big American companies were very anxious to peddle the multibillion dollar Goliaths or little baby “research” reactors all over the world. The only difference in them is how much atomic bomb making material each can produce in a year when set up right.

The big megawatt reactors can make the stuff for about 40 atom bombs a year. Indeed, that is their primary purpose. The highly subsidized, very expensive, very dirty “electrical power” the reactors heat water to make is effective political cover. The couch potato – dumbed down American public – does not see the reactors’ true purpose: atom bomb production.

More than 40 countries now have 430 reactors around the world. That means more than 40 countries can produce, or already have produced, global thermonuclear weapons.

The Pentagon wanted to be able to use radioactive uranium to kill and cause deadly cancers without the very noticeable boom of an actual atom bomb. The entire world was really down on the big atom bomb blasts on human populations. Still, the Americans exploded 1,200 atom bombs before Dr. Ernest Sternglass and others convinced the United States Senate to approve the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty in 1962.

The amount of radiation released by the atomic bombs pales in comparison to the huge amount of permanent killing radiation released in Iraq. The total radioactive life span of uranium weapons is a majestically creepazoid 45 billion years. The Iraqis have a right to ask, “Why do the Americans hate us so? Why do the Americans want to exterminate us?”

Ordinary use of the big atom bomb was out. What were the U.S. political and military leaders to do? Answer: Go directly to the major radiation dispersing element in the atomic bombs and use it for radioactive munitions: dirty bullets, dirty shells and dirty bombs – depleted uranium. Problem solved. The military-industrial-congressional complex had their force multiplier back.

But, with budgetary battles and contending with those within the military who opposed Radiation Dispersing Weapons, it took decades to craft and develop the uranium munitions. Keep in mind that these are not “uranium covered” or “uranium tipped” or “weakly radioactive” weapons as Pentagon apologists, propagandists and other war promoters say they are. They lie. Uranium weapons in use today are machined from solid uranium.

The most plentiful metal in the atom bombs used to devastate Japan and warn the world about the trigger happy senior American leadership was so-called “depleted uranium.” It was five feet thick and only fractionally less radioactive than the feedstock uranium it came from.

DU would be ideal as a killer weaponized radioactive uranium gas fired in conventional weapons. A vanishing small percentage of the radioactive uranium in a hundred pounds of uranium is deadly enough to make atomic bombs; but it is all radioactive. Take one half of the tiny amount of bomb making stuff out and it is called “depleted uranium.” What a con, and hundreds of millions of Americans fell for it!

Thus, depleted uranium rounds, including bombs, were born. They were tested in various wars – field tests for new weapons – and configurations before the new genocidal munitions were ready for prime time in the 1991 Iraq “war” turkey shoot.

The Pentagon admitted to using 320 tons of DU – of weaponized uranium gas, aerosols and fragments – that left Iraq a cancer ridden radioactive wasteland. The genocide embracing American forces were not through with Iraq yet, though. They would be back.

The Americans have spent billions of dollars to set up and maintain a huge industrial operation to produce nuclear weapons of all kinds. This ranges from the publicly understood atomic bombs like those used on two Japanese cities’ civilian populations to the nuclear radiation dispersing bullets, shells, land mines, missiles and bombs. The uranium weapon as a force multiplier is alive and well.

Today, this vast industrial strength nuclear weapons establishment maintains four ammunition storage dumps in the U.S. and an unknown number around the world. Each of the U.S. ammo dumps in the U.S. is licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to have 22,000,000 pounds of actual uranium on hand in uranium munitions. When these huge war material centers move into high gear, they are a wonder of lethal industrial killing efficiency.

To maintain “Class 1” status, the ammo dumps must be able to ship 3.2 million pounds of weapons a day for 30 days. That can total 384,000,000 pounds of radioactive weaponized ceramic uranium oxide poison gas dispersing weapons per month.

George Bush the Second launched the “shock and awe” uranium bombing campaign against Baghdad and the remainder of Iraq in March of 2003. Within nine days, microscopic radioactive uranium oxide particles were detected in special high volume air filters in Aldermaston, England, some 2,700 miles away. Millions of pounds of uranium gas contaminated Baghdad yet again.

Government and university scientists estimated the five week uranium bombing campaign exposed hundreds of millions of people in Europe and Britain to tiny radioactive particles at the adult male lung dose rate of 23 million particles.

Cancers and other illnesses will follow, of course. For the first time in 41 years, the infant neonatal death rate is inching up. The tiniest babies die first. Tony Blair, the English prime minister, tried to ride the tiger too many times to no effect. The berserker Americans were uncontrollable. This is Bush’s true legacy.

Now, we really must listen to the war criminals in the senior American political and military leadership. The purpose of the illegal uranium weapons is to multiply the effectiveness of a smaller force by killing or maiming the enemy continuously, after the initial battle is over. The millions of pounds of radioactive ceramic uranium oxide gas and dust all over Iraq are a deadly virtual army – killing and maiming civilian Iraqi men, women and children continuously.

People have always thought wars against children are particularly gross. That is not a problem for the American war machine planners at the Pentagon. Just look at what they do.

The radioactive virtual army secures the Iraqi homeland. The American war criminals are free to “redeploy” or ship the now radioactive, dying, constantly replaced American Army veterans to whatever little country is next – Iran, Syria or North Korea.

“Only” about 2,300 American troopers were sacrificed in the past three years in Iraq. Those deaths are acceptable to the American leadership. So were those of 250,000 Iraqis. They will move on and turn yet another country into radioactive rubble. The only real question is: “Who’s next?”

Some Americans think that all this just could not happen in America. Foolish American intellectuals think that mere words without acts will deter the in-control American fascists. They simply do not understand that the old American Republic is dead and gone.

Now, in 2006, the United States is the most successful fascist empire, with the most lethal military, in the history of the world. The fascist government of war criminals and crooks must be put out as soon as possible, certainly before they invade Iran and use global thermonuclear weapons as promised and nuclear munitions again to do so. Words do not count in this arena, though, only actions.

Because, ultimately, these senior American generals and politicians must be cast out of office, tried and appropriately punished for committing these war crimes. It is the right thing to do. What America is doing to the world is wrong and criminal. All Americans are war criminals. We all bear responsibility – all 300 million of us.

There are at least six individuals, probably hundreds more, affiliated with the DOD, the CIA and the DOE who aggressively argue for the God given right of the American Expeditionary Forces to use deadly uranium weapons. These public relations masters work hand in glove with their programming counterparts in the big media to maintain the lie.

Since this article will only be seen in the SF Bay View newspaper, which goes all over the U.S. and the world, and on the Internet, it is fairly easy for these despised characters to publish continuous “feel-good” articles about these nuclear munitions. Already this series of anti-nuclear munition articles is sent by you, the readers, all over the country and the world. You must do more – always more.

Feel outraged? Helpless? Upset? Powerless? I do!

Do you want to stop these Americans from committing these war crimes? Then you must “be the media.” Do the only thing you can control. Tell your friends and neighbors about this. Just say, “The U.S. is using radioactive weapons and is destroying the world. What can we do to mess with them? Let’s do it.”

Working together, you will be able to figure out all manner of wildly inventive and cool things to do to stop this worldwide menace. The generals and politicians don’t stand a chance against a righteously angry American public. Just go ahead and do it. Don’t wait for permission. You are right! Don’t be timid! The whole world is watching.

Thank you for your time.

Bob Nichols is a Project Censored Award Winner. He is a correspondent for the San Francisco Bay View newspaper and a frequent contributor to various online publications. Nichols is completing a book based on 15 years of nuclear war in Central Asia. He is a former employee of the McAlester Army Ammunition Plant. You are encouraged to write him at bob.bobnichols@gmail.com or DUweapons@gmail.com.
 

______________________________________

JTA-small news-2.6.06

Pope speaks out against anti-Semitism
 
Pope Benedict XVI referred specifically to anti-Semitism and wartime Jewish suffering.
“Today’s humanity must not forget Auschwitz and the other ‘factories of death’ where the Nazi regime tried to eliminate God in order to take his place,” he said.

 

Many saw his remarks as a response to Jewish groups’ criticism that he did not explicitly mention anti-Semitism and the Jewish victims of the Nazis when he spoke at Auschwitz on Sunday. “Humanity must not give in to the temptation of racial hatred, which is at the origin of the worst forms of anti-Semitism,” he said in Rome on Wednesday.

 

In a statement after the pope’s address at Auschwitz, the Anti-Defamation League’s national director, Abraham Foxman, said, “Standing at the crematoria, the world’s largest Jewish cemetery, the pope uttered not one word about anti-Semitism; not one explicit acknowledgment of Jewish lives vanquished simply because they were Jews.”
 
 **Lawmakers want travel ban on Ahmadinejad
 
Seventy-five European lawmakers asked the European Union president to impose a travel ban on Iran’s president.
The petition is aimed, in part, at preventing Mahmoud Ahmadinejad from traveling to next week’s soccer World Cup in Germany, although Ahmadinejad’s spokesman said earlier this week that he would not be traveling to the event.

 

“We do not wish the Iranian president to come to Europe for very clear reasons — his attacks on Israel, his denials concerning the Holocaust,” Jana Hybaskova, member of the European People’s Party, the largest faction in the European Parliament, told The Associated Press.

 

Ahmadinejad has repeatedly questioned Israel’s right to exist, said the country should be wiped off the map and called the Holocaust a myth.
 
** Jewish groups welcome Senate immigration bill
 
Jewish groups welcomed a U.S. immigration bill that includes paths for undocumented immigrants to legalize their status.
The Reform movement and the American Jewish Committee each welcomed the bill passed last week in the Senate. The bill was an improvement over a U.S. House of Representatives version, both groups said, because the House version emphasized enforcement at the expense of amnesty.

 

The Senate bill “offers a comprehensive solution incorporating a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and a sensible temporary worker system,” AJCommittee said.
 
 **Rabbi meets African president on Israel
 
A prominent U.S. rabbi met with Senegal’s president to discuss Israel’s relations with the Arab world and ways to implement a tentative peace accord in Darfur.
The private discussions between Rabbi Arthur Schneier, the president of the Appeal of Conscience Foundation, and Abdoulaye Wade took place earlier this week in Senegal.

 

Schneier was part of the U.N. Alliance of Civilizations High-Level Group, which visited Senegal with the aim of issuing recommendations to United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan on how to close the gap between Islam and the West.

 

While in Senegal, Schneier called on the United Nations to organize an international conference focused on the issue of textbooks that foment chauvinism and racial hatred.
 
**Prague to get Jewish nursing home
 
Groundbreaking is set to begin on a Jewish nursing home in Prague this month.
The new Prague Jewish Community puts its own stamp on the Hagibor project, expanding it beyond a 60-bed nursing home. It will also be an assisted-living facility with a JCC-like activity center that will offer classes, a swimming pool, sports facilities and a concert hall intended to attract Jews of all ages.

 

The $6.84 million facility is set to open within two years.

 

 

___________________________________

Endgame in Iran       

 

By Mike Whitney

  

06/01/06 "Information Clearing House" -- -- “The US is updating contingency plans for a strike to cripple Iran’s atomic weapon program if international diplomacy fails….The plan calls for a rolling, five-day bombing campaign against 400 key targets, including 24 nuclear-related sites, 14 military airfields and radar installations, and Revolutionary Guard headquarters.”   Ian Bruce, “US spells out plan to bomb Iran”, The UK Herald   

   

   The Bush administration has no intention of peacefully resolving the nuclear dispute with Iran. They have consistently blocked all attempts by Iran to negotiate in good faith or to establish diplomatic channels for discussion. The current offer by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to talk directly with Iran is less a departure from the normal US’ belligerence than it is a means of enlisting support from Russia and China for future punitive action. In one particularly ominous comment, Rice said that the negotiations would give Iran “one last excuse” to resist American demands. This tells us that US diplomacy is a just a smokescreen for the eventual hostilities.

    

    It took the United States months of behind the scenes wrangling to persuade the UN Security Council to even consider Iran’s “alleged” nuclear weapons programs. Iran tried to prevent this by offering to allow surprise inspections on any facility suspected of covert nuclear activity. Iran is not required to do this under the terms of the NPT, but volunteered as a way of building confidence among the member states. The Bush administration, which made this a vital part of earlier demands, rejected the offer outright saying that Iran’s concession would not be enough to end the standoff.

     

   A similar incident took place just weeks earlier when Iran was finalizing the details of an agreement with Russia to enrich uranium outside of the country. Iran figured that this would allay US fears that it was secretively developing nuclear weapons.

 

    Again, the Bush administration rejected this “good will” gesture as insufficient, while Condi Rice scoffed at the idea as a trick. These are just latest examples of Iran’s efforts to find a peaceful way to placate Washington. The administration is not interested in concessions or settlements. It is simply building the case for punitive action or war. 

    

   Despite growing pressure from the administration, the Security Council has not agreed on a resolution condemning Iran’s nuclear programs. So far, Iran has cooperated fully with the IAEA and there’s simply no evidence of non compliance. It took an enormous effort by the Bush administration to push a feeble “non-binding presidential statement” through the Council. The statement neither endorses economic sanctions nor military action. It is a toothless declaration that is utterly meaningless except for its use in fueling the propaganda campaign against the Islamic regime.

    

   The administration has hit a road-block at the Security Council. Their appeal for decisive action is going nowhere.

   

    Last week, Secretary of State Rice said, “Security guarantees for Iran were off the table”. Her announcement reveals the true depth of America’s inflexibility and the unlikelihood of a peaceful solution. If the United States refuses to sign a “non aggression pact”, then what incentive is there for Iran to abandon its nuclear programs?  After all, Iran has the “inalienable right” to enrich uranium under the NPT. Shouldn’t that at least be a bargaining chip for negotiations with the US?

      

   The administration’s hardnosed approach precludes any future compromise. Their stubbornness only makes sense if the ultimate objective is war, which appears to be where Washington is headed.

 

   If we compare the present situation to the lead up to the war in Iraq, we can assume that the war plans are already underway. The maneuverings at the UN are just a facade to conceal the movement of military hardware and troops. Once the logistical work is done, the administration will create a pretext for attacking Iran just as it did with Iraq.  Rice's globe-trotting diplomacy means nothing; it's Cheney and Rumsfeld who will decide when the time is right. 

 

   The administration sees non-aggression treaties as a sign of weakness unworthy of a superpower. As stated in its National Security Strategy (NSS) the United States reserves the right to attack any nation that may challenge its national interests or its global supremacy. Iran is the next domino to establishing permanent American hegemony. Controlling the oil resources of the Caspian Basin and removing regional rivals to Israel remain the fundamental goals of Bush’s global resource war. This makes a military confrontation with Iran inevitable. It is absurd to expect the Bush administration will seriously negotiate when their final purpose is regime change.  

      

   In a recent article in Counterpunch, “Embedded Journalism and the Disinformation Campaign for War on Iran”, Gary Leupp notes that the same cadres of neocons who misled the nation into war with Iraq have been reassembled in the Pentagon to repeat their success against Iran. Under the rubric of “The Office of Iranian Affairs”; Abram Shulsky, Elizabeth Cheney and other far-right hawks fill out a roster of pro-war advocates. Their task is to prepare the country for war by generating fear and suspicion of Iran’s imaginary weapons programs. The group's influence is probably similar to that of Judith Miller who was allowed to spout her bogus claims about Iraqi WMD from headlines across the country. In this case, however, the intention is to omit the critical facts about Iran’s activities rather than simply inventing false allegations.

 

  For example, the media invariably excludes the important details about Iran’s programs that would allow American’s to form an educated opinion. These are:

 

   1 The IAEA has consistently said that there is “no evidence” that Iran has a nuclear weapons program or is diverting nuclear material from its research.

 

   2  Iran has been in full compliance with all its treaty obligations for 3 years although it has undergone the most intensive inspection regime in the history of the IAEA.

 

   3 The UN Security Council reaffirmed Iran’s “inalienable right” to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes and did not order Iran to suspend nuclear enrichment as was falsely reported in the news.

 

   4 The United States has violated its obligations under the NPT by developing a new regime of “bunker busting” low yield nuclear weapons.

 

   5 That the United States is violating the UN Charter by unilaterally threatening a sovereign nation which is not in breach of any UN resolution.

  

    These are the fundamental facts that the American people need to know to make an informed judgment about the present confrontation. Instead, the media simply reiterates the specious claims of government officials without regard to either international law (NPT) or the findings of the UN watchdog agency, the IAEA. We must assume that the media is working with high-ranking officials in The Office of Iranian Affairs to produce news that is so obviously skewed in favor of the administration. After all, their entire raison d’etre is to create the rationale for moving the country to war.   

 

   A growing number of American elites are uneasy with the precipitous decline of American prestige as well as the reckless approach to foreign policy. Henry Kissinger has joined Madeleine Albright, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Chuck Hegel and other CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) luminaries to pressure the Bush administration to open a direct dialogue with Iran. Until today, Bush showed no sign that he would do so. Despite the many setbacks in Iraq, the “war president” still appears to be entirely under the spell of VP Dick Cheney and Sec-Def Donald Rumsfeld. Regrettably, there’s no indication that Rumsfeld or Cheney are the least bit affected by the widening divisions in elite-opinion. They are in complete control of the policy-making apparatus and should be expected to execute their war plan regardless of its unpopularity or its long-term consequences.

  

    In a recent article by Gareth Porter Iran Proposal to US offered Peace with Israel, the author reports that in 2003 Iran not only offered “to accept peace with Israel and cut off material assistance to Palestinian armed groups” but made a “two-page proposal for a broad US-Iran agreement covering all the issues facing the two countries”. The secret document that was provided to IPS proves that Iran is neither committed to the destruction of Israel nor to the continued sponsorship of terrorist groups.

.   

   “What the Iranians wanted in return,” Porter says, “ was an end to U.S. hostility and recognition of Iran as a legitimate power in the region” They want to see a “halt in hostile US behavior and rectification of status of Iran in the US” as well as "recognition of Iran's legitimate security interests in the region with according defense capacity.” (ISP)

    

    Respect and security; the same demands that one expects from any reasonable sovereign nation.

   

    “In 2003, Bush refused to allow any response to the Iranian offer to negotiate an agreement that would have accepted the existence of Israel.” (IPS)

   

   This implies that the decision to attack Iran must have been made in the earliest years of the Bush administration. (Perhaps, even before Bush took office as indicated in the Project for the New American Century)  

  Will there be a war with Iran?

  The UK Herald reported two weeks ago (“US spells out plan to bomb Iran”, Ian Bruce) that “the US is updating contingency plans for a strike to cripple Iran’s atomic weapon program if international diplomacy fails….The plan calls for a rolling, five-day bombing campaign against 400 key targets, including 24 nuclear-related sites, 14 military airfields and radar installations, and Revolutionary Guard headquarters.”

   If there is an invasion it will probably be limited to securing the region of Khuzestan which is adjacent to Iraq’s southern flank and contains 90% of Iran’s oil wealth as well as much of its natural gas. This could be achieved with as little as 15-20,000 combat troops, plus a backup of Special Forces. The rest could be accomplished by aerial bombardments of military installations, radar, artillery placements, missile silos, nuclear sites and Republican Guard facilities. Needless to say, there are not “400 nuclear targets” in Iran. The Herald article implies that the Pentagon is anticipating a “Serbia-type” attack which disrupts major industry, oil production and civilian infrastructure.  This strategy has been described in great detail by author John Pilger in his article “Calling the Kosovo Humanitarians to Account” Pilger states:

    “NATO's civilian targets included public transport, hospitals, schools, museums, churches. ..bombing bridges on Sunday afternoons and market places."

  

    Citing the goal of opening the region to a “free-market economy”, Pilger notes how NATO intentionally targeted state owned businesses to bring Kosovo into the global economic paradigm and remove any stain of its socialist past. Pilger says:

   

   “In the bombing campaign that followed, it was state-owned companies, rather than military sites, that were targeted. NATO's destruction of only 14 Yugoslav army tanks compares with its bombing of 372 centers of industry, including the Zastava car factory, leaving hundreds of thousands jobless. Not one foreign or privately owned factory was bombed.”

   

    We expect that the same basic model will be applied to  Iran, although the assault will be papered-over by the “state-media franchise” (the “free press”) Iran has no nuclear weapons programs and Washington knows it. It is being prepared for “economic reform” and “structural readjustment” so that it can be included into the prevailing system of predatory capital and satisfy the west’s ravenous appetite for cheap oil and new markets.

  

  US carrier groups are already moving to the Gulf and the finishing touches are being put on the battle plans. Lt General Sam Gardiner expects that an attack will come as early as June 2006.  http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article13458.htm

 

Former CIA Analyst Says Iran Strike Set For June Or July
McGovern: Staged terror attacks across Europe, US "probable" in order to justify invasion

_________________________


Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | June 1 2006

Former CIA analyst and Presidential advisor Ray McGovern, fresh from his heated public confrontation with Donald Rumsfeld, fears that staged terror attacks across Europe and the US are probable in order to justify the Bush administration's plan to launch a military strike against Iran, which he thinks will take place in June or July.

Appearing on The Alex Jones Show, McGovern was asked about the timetable for war in Iran and said that behind the diplomatic smokescreen, the final chess pieces were being moved into position.

"There is already one carrier task force there in the Gulf, two are steaming toward it at the last report I have at least - they will all be there in another week or so."

"The propaganda has been laid, the aircraft carriers are in place, it doesn't take much to fly the bombers out of British and US bases - cruse missiles are at the ready, Israel is egging us on," said McGovern.

McGovern said Iran's likely response to a US air strike would be threefold - mobilizing worldwide terrorist cells that would make Al-Qaeda look like a girls netball team - utilizing its cruise missile arsenal to attack US ships and sending fighters into Iraq to attack US forces.

"The Iranians can easily send three divisions of revolutionary guard troops right over....the long border with Iraq," said McGovern, stating that the local Sunni population of Iraq would welcome such an invasion.

The turmoil caused by such an action would lead the US to tap its so-called 'mini-nuke' arsenal said McGovern, opening a new Pandora's box of chaos.

McGovern highlighted President Bush's all time record low approval ratings as a reason for launching an attack on Iran to again whip up false patriotic fervour.

"I can see Karl Rove saying, 'look what you need to do is become a war president again, get us involved with something pretty big here and then strut around and say you can't vote for a bunch of Democrats to pull the rug out from under me while there's a war going on'."

McGovern drew a comparison with the concillatory cold war stance of Russia and JFK's decision to respond in a similar manner, and the Iranian President's letter which was immediately dismissed by the Bush administration. JFK's approach saved the US from potential nuclear annihilation while Bush's actions put the US in severe danger as Russia and China give ominous mixed signals on what their response to a US strike on Iran will be.

McGovern lambasted Bush's inner circle as uniformly lacking any real military experience and characterized them as a cabal already hell-bent on war.

McGovern entertained the notion that western governments and intelligence hierarchies could potentially stage terror attacks in Europe and the US either before or after an invasion of Iran.

"That's altogether possible," said McGovern.

"I would say even probable because they need some proximate cause, some casus belli to justify really unleashing things on Iran....I would put very little past this crew - their record of dissembling and disingenuousness is unparalleled."

McGovern said that Rove, Cheney and Rumsfeld, fearing impeachment and Enron-style criminal proceedings, are urging President Bush to launch a war in order to create a climate unconducive to lengthy investigations and impeachment proceedings.

Asked to cite specifically when we should expect to see an attack launched, McGovern said, "I think we all agree that an attack is likely before the election and we all agree that it has to do largely with the election - as for timing I see a likelihood that it could come as early as late June or early July, most of my colleagues predict August, September, maybe an October surprise even."

"My thinking is that for it to be October that would be so crass and so transparent that even this crowd would shy away from making it so obvious," said McGovern.

McGovern is set to appear along with a host of other respected and credible whistleblowers at the American Scholars Symposium at the end of this month.

Click here to listen to a clip of the interview with Ray McGovern. Prison Planet.tv members can listen to the entirety of this interview. If you are not a subscriber please consider the great benefits of becoming an exclusive member by clicking here

 

Top | Home

©-free 2006 Adelaide Institute