The
Ottomans allowed some immigration by Jews into Palestine, and the movement
continued after the defeat of the Ottoman Empire by the British in World War
I. There was already a small number of Jews who had been living in Palestine at the time of the
first waves of Zionist immigrants. They did not share the objective of an
independent Jewish state. They were content with their state of affairs,
where they enjoyed an affluent life style and had no problems with their
Arab neighbours. It is those Eastern Jews who are now second-class citizens
among their own people.
Palestine's Jewish population, mostly
European Jews fleeing Europe, was under 8% of the total population in
1914(1). Jewish land ownership in Palestine was then under 2 per cent.
Despite active British Mandate assistance to the Zionist movement between
1918-1948 (based on the commitment Britain made to the Zionist movement in
the infamous “Balfour Declaration”), Palestine's Jewish population in
1947 increased to only 33 per cent of the total population (2). Jewish
land ownership in Palestine was under 7 per cent in 1947(3).
Half a century later, The Zionist
entity has achieved little. The total number of Palestinians inside and
outside of Palestine adds up to 8.2 million. The number of Jews in Palestine
is 4.5-5 million. The ratio is still the same as it was in 1947, 2 to 1 in
favour of the Palestinian people.
However, Jewish land ownership is
increased by intimidation, land confiscation and an institutionalised
process of gradual ethnic cleansing. Today, 80 per cent of the Palestinian
people are out of their homes, out of their country, out of the land upon
which they lived and under which their ancestors are buried.
Jews in every Western country try
their hardest to push the concept of multiculturalism, with all its notions
of equality and harmony among all ethnic groups, Yet, when it comes to
Israel they want a "Jewish State", and above all to maintain its
"Jewish character". Such arrogance is being fostered by an
increasing Jewish grip on the governments and institutions in Western
countries.
Jews want to win each-way. They want a
liberal global attitude towards race and ethnicity in all other countries,
in order to creep freely on to positions of power in those countries. But
when it comes to stolen Palestine, they want a “Jewish State” with a
“Jewish character”. Deceit, arrogance, greed and dishonesty are not
alien to an extremist Jewish thinking and way of life.
So, why was Israel established on 14
May 1948? Why did the world community, as represented by the United Nations,
condone such a crime against the Palestinian people? A crime that lingered
for more than half a century and will linger on until the racist Zionist
entity is dismantled and the land is reclaimed by its rightful owners, the
Palestinian people.
At the time, in 1948, the creation of
Israel had the backing of the two rivals, the United States and the Soviet
Union; an amazing concurrence during the cold war. Jewish intrigue and
control of governments has no barriers. Super powers may differ on all
contentious issues, but they will readily agree on anything their Jew
masters dictate The biblical myth of the “Promised Land” flourished in
Europe only after the Second World War. The British in mandated Palestine
either failed or turned a blind eye to the flood of thousands of Jewish
hordes that entered the country prior to 1947. Europe was more than happy to
get rid of them, since the isolationist way of life of Jews was a major
factor in generating hatred toward them in Europe. Palestinians never hated
Jews until they robbed them of their country.
The early intentions for Palestine can
be illustrated by what Chaim Weissman said in 1919(4):
“We have agreed to accept the
original stipulation of the British Government as follows: It is clearly
understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and
religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the
rights and political status of Jews living in other countries. You see, our
aims for the present are modest and cautious. Later, an Independent
Government of Palestine will be a natural outgrowth of the new circumstances
and conditions”.
The element of Zionist deceit and
intrigue was there from the beginning. The promise of not prejudicing the
civil and religious rights of the Palestinians was never kept. Instead, a
gradual process unfolded by which Palestinians were evicted from their
homes to make room for more Jewish immigrants.
“Transferring" European Jews to
Palestine and "transferring" the Palestinian people out was the
main theme of the Zionist movement. Ben Gurion stated in 1944:
"Zionism is a TRANSFER of the
Jews. Regarding the TRANSFER of the Arabs this is much easier than any other
TRANSFER. There are Arab states in the vicinity . . .and it is clear that if
the Arabs are removed this will improve their condition and not the
contrary." (5)
The process continued unabated. The
more concessions the Palestinians made, the greedier the Zionists became.
While Palestinians eventually agreed to divide Palestine between themselves
and the racist Jewish invaders, the latter refused and started building
Jewish colonies in the Palestinian section earmarked for a future
Palestinian state. Namely: Gaza and the West Bank. Is that a gesture of good
will? Jews sat in mock peace negotiations talking concessions while building
more Jewish colonies in the West Bank. Everybody, including the UN, appear
to view the original 1947 partition plan as dead. The plan was stillborn
anyway; Zionists had their own plans.
Western corporate media invented the
cliché "Israel's right to exist". Who gave such a right to a
parasitic racist entity that was carved by force in 1948? It is no
coincidence that Arabs surround Israel on all sides. The land on which
Israel was created belonged to the Palestinian Arabs. Palestinians lived in
Palestine on a land that has layers upon layers of their ancestry. The
majority of Jews in Palestine are no more than hordes of East Europeans and
others, who have no roots or any association with the land.
In order to understand thoroughly the
changing geographical landscape of the region, we have to go as far back as
the end of the First World War when the Turkish Ottoman Empire totally
disintegrated. Palestine was then among the former Ottoman Arab territories
which were placed under the administration of Great Britain, under the
Mandates System adopted by the United Nations pursuant to Covenant Article
22.
All the "Mandated
Territories" became fully independent states except Palestine where,
instead of being limited to "the rendering of administrative assistance
and advice", the Mandate had as a primary objective the implementation
of the "Balfour Declaration" issued by the British Government in
1917, expressing support for "the establishment in Palestine of a
national home for the Jewish people". The Balfour Declaration is best
described by a famous Arabic quip, "He who did not own gave a promise
to those who did not deserve."
During the years of the Palestine
Mandate, from 1922 to 1947, Britain turned the blind eye to illegal
large-scale Jewish immigration from abroad, mainly from Eastern Europe. The
numbers swelled in the 1930s with the alleged Nazi persecution of Jews.
Hitler used to drive truckloads of Jews to be dumped over Germany's borders.
Many years later myth had it that he used to kill them in "gas
chambers" and roast the corpses in pizza ovens. It has been a great
dollar-earner for all Jews expelled from Germany, who later called
themselves "survivors", but that is another story about which
revisionist scholars have written volumes. The German people have no blood
on their hands. It is the Jewish gangsters in Palestine who have their hands
soaked in Palestinian blood, which they continue to spill for the sake of a
fanatic project that is doomed to failure.
Palestinian demands for independence and resistance to Jewish immigration
were never heeded by Britain. The British government, like many other
European governments, has always been under Jewish control. This led to a
Palestinian rebellion in 1937, followed by continuing violence between the
indigenous Arabs and the migrating Jewish squatters.
What used to be called “Great
Britain” had a devilish policy of leaving behind disputable regions and
border problems among newly independent countries. Examples that would come
to mind are Kashmir between India and Pakistan, three tiny islands between
Iran and the Arab Emirates and an undefined border between Qatar and Arabia.
Immediately after World War II, Great Britain tried to implement various
formulas in order to further complicate the situation in Palestine. In 1947,
after contributing to the creation of a murky mess, Great Britain turned the
problem over to the United Nations.
Various alternatives were examined by
the UN. Eventually, it proposed the partitioning of Palestine into two
independent States, one Palestinian Arab and the other Jewish, with
Jerusalem internationalised. (Refer to Resolution 181 (II) of 1947.)
Time was then ripe for the execution of the Zionist grand scheme. The
partition plan was then only a vision with no clear plan for its execution.
"Israel" unilaterally declared its independence. Palestinians and
their Arab neighbours, detested the idea of slicing Palestine into two
sections. War erupted in 1948.
Zionist and extremist Jews spare no
effort to offer a distorted record of historical facts. They nurture a
fondness for sweeping generalisations like, "Those Palestinians were
offered a state in 1947, but they refused. They fought us and lost." It
is this kind of distortion that exploits the complexity of the issue in
order to propagate similar lies. Some revision of history is required here.
All Arab countries were then under the
rule of puppets appointed by or loyal to foreign powers, mainly British or
French. Royal families, usually of dubious Jewish origins, were erected in
several Arab countries. An Albanian family from the times of the Ottoman
Empire continued to rule Egypt. Such rulers and governments of mixed
loyalties mounted a farcical war in 1948 against the hordes of
"Zionist" squatters in Palestine. Corruption and outright treason
by Arab rulers prevailed. The Egyptian Army fought with faulty
weapons, bought in shabby arms deals by corrupt politicians. The Iraqi army
did not fire a single bullet because they “had no orders” (The famous
Arabic cliché “maco awamer”). The lame effort resulted in the expansion
of "Israel" to occupy 77 per cent of the original territory of
Palestine. Israel also occupied the larger part of Jerusalem. The invading
squatters went on an orgy of wanton massacres and intimidation. It resulted
in forcing more than half of the indigenous Palestinian population out of
Palestine.
So, to claim that the Palestinians
rejected the partition plan, fought and lost, must be qualified by a
statement that incompetent Arab governments were the main party that
rejected the partition plan and contributed to the mess that followed.
According to the original UN partition
plan, what may now be termed the "occupied territories' were previously
the "West Bank" then occupied by Jordan, the Gaza strip occupied
by Egypt and the land in between, occupied by the newly formed
"Israel". Israel also occupied half of Jerusalem. So, in 1948
Israel was established on the territory suggested by the partition plan and,
in defiance of that plan, also occupied parts of the suggested Palestine and
half of Jerusalem, which was supposed to be internationalised.
Zionist Jews of Israel subsequently
inspired Zionist Jews of the US as early as 1967, when they introduced the
concept of the "pre-emptive strike", which was later often
mentioned in the ramblings of George Walker Bush, as a means of protecting
the US against its assumed enemies. Needless to say, the US is working hard
on making such enemies via a bankrupt foreign policy.
In the 1967 war, Israel occupied the
remaining territory of the original Palestine, until then under Jordanian
and Egyptian control (the West Bank and Gaza Strip). This also included the
remaining Eastern part of Jerusalem, which was subsequently annexed by
Israel. The Israelis also occupied the Sinai Peninsula, which was part of
Egypt. Sinai was an important part of the blueprint for the Zionist grand
scheme of "Greater Israel". The "six day war" in 1967
brought about a second exodus of Palestinians, estimated at about half a
million.
Security Council resolution 242 of 22 November 1967 called on Israel to
withdraw from territories it had occupied in the 1967 conflict. Like all
other such UN resolutions, it was never observed. Israel continued to defy
the world, under the protection of the Zionist Jews controlling the US
government. Instead of forcing Israel to abide by the decisions of the world
community, it continued to pour financial aid into the coffers of the
Israeli government. Israel has had governments headed by terrorists and war
criminals from David Ben Gurion to Ariel Sharon. But that never
worried the “friends of Israel” in the White House.
In 1973, another war erupted. I am not
going to bore you with the known details of the conflict, but I would like
to posit a theory of my own. It is a historical fact that Anwar Sadat of
Egypt was an agent of the US. It was revealed by CIA declassified documents
that he was on their pay roll, together with the late King Hussein of
Jordan. It follows that Sadat must have had some level of co-ordination with
the US.
The US did not come to the rescue of
Israel until after three days of fighting, during which time the Israeli
army was devastated. Was it some punishment from some quarters of the US, to
avenge the attempt by the Israelis at sinking the US spy ship ”Liberty”
in 1967? It is obvious that the war was conducted by Egypt within certain
imposed limitations that did not allow the Egyptian army to push on for a
comprehensive victory while it could. Who knows? We might wait for another
thirty or forty more years before the facts are known, if ever. Sadat killed
his army generals, who knew all the facts, in a staged helicopter crash,
where the only survivor was the helicopter pilot.
Sadat himself was later killed, most
likely at the instigation of the CIA, and the blessings of his successor.
Unfortunately, dead people do not say much. But as far as we know, Sadat
made his pre-rehearsed “surprise” visit to the Israeli Knesset and drove
another nail into the coffin of Arab unity against Israel, their common
enemy and the enemy of humanity.
In 1974, the UN General assembly once
again affirmed the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination,
independence, sovereignty and the right of return. Israel, to this very day,
denies such rights to the Palestinians, while giving the right to any Jew on
Earth to migrate to Israel, in order to live on stolen Palestinian land.
In 1975, the UN established a
“Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian
People.” The PLO was given observer status in the Assembly and all UN
conferences.
The period that followed saw little
activity until June 1982 when Israel invaded Lebanon in pursuit of the PLO.
When a truce was arranged, PLO fighters withdrew from Beirut to neighbouring
countries. Unarmed Palestinian refugees fell victim to Lebanese militias
loyal to Israel, in the large-scale massacre of the Sabra and Shatila
refugee camps, for which the war criminal Ariel Sharon was responsible.
In September 1983, the
“International Conference on the Question of Palestine”, which was
widely attended, adopted the “Geneva Declaration” containing the
following principles:
“The need to oppose and reject the
establishment of settlements in the occupied territory and actions taken by
Israel to change the status of Jerusalem, the right of all States in the
region to existence within secure and internationally recognised boundaries,
with justice and security for all the people, and the attainment of the
legitimate, inalienable rights of the Palestinian people."
But that is all talk and no action on
the part of the UN. We all know that Israel has never paid much attention to
UN resolutions. Besides, one country after another, including the US, did or
are contemplating the idea of moving their embassies from Tel Aviv to
Jerusalem; thus approving of its annexation by Israel in defiance of UN
resolution 181 of 1947.
In December 1987, a mass uprising
against the Israeli occupation began in the occupied Palestinian territory
(The First Intifadah). Methods used by the Israeli forces during the
uprising resulted in mass injuries and heavy loss of life among the civilian
Palestinian population. In October 1991, The Madrid Peace Conference was
convened. Negotiations were carried out along two parallel tracks: Between Israel and the Arab States,
and between Israel and the Palestinians.
The basis for negotiation was Security
Council resolutions 242 of 1967 and 338 of 1973. Mutual recognition resulted
between the Government of the State of Israel and the Palestine Liberation
Organisation (PLO). The parties signed the “Declaration of Principles on
Interim Self-Government”.
Arrangements in September 1993
resulted in a partial Israeli withdrawal and the election of the Palestinian
Council and the president of the Palestinian Authority. Palestinians took
over the administration in the areas under Palestinian self-rule.
In real terms, Palestinians were
assigned the dirty job of rounding up the militant elements amongst them,
for the benefit of the enemy. It was a formula that later proved divisive
and disastrous.
The UN General
Assembly welcomed the Declaration of Principles and reaffirmed that "the
United Nations has a permanent responsibility with respect to the question
of Palestine until the question is resolved in all its aspects in a
satisfactory manner in accordance with international legitimacy.”
Does this empty
rhetoric amount to much? Very little indeed, other than giving Israel more
time to procrastinate while maintaining the status quo, as a precursor to
further violation and expansion.
During the past few years, there has
been some concern at the stalemate in the peace negotiations. Arab
governments find refuge in empty, futile negotiations as a means of
dampening the anger of their people. The world is concerned about acts
of violence against civilians, the actions of the government of Israel with
regard to Jerusalem, the so-called settlements, land confiscation,
demolition of Palestinian homes and other acts of collective punishment of
civilians. Much has been said, but very little was done to put Israel on
leash.
The events in the US of 11 September
2001, and the subsequent phoney “war on terror”, have obscured the
situation and given Israel’s war criminals a free hand to reoccupy the
remainder of Palestine, but at a price. Continued “Shahada Strikes”
(martyrdom) by courageous Palestinian youth are followed by reprisal
counter-strikes from the Israeli Army.
Israel has been on an extended state
of emergency for the last couple of years, as a result of the “Second
Intifada”. This is crippling the Israeli economy. Every able Israeli is
supposedly ready for active army service, further disrupting civilian life
and the economy.
Now, I arrive at the main point I am
trying to make. Why is Israel doomed?
Young Palestinians are willing to die
for their country, using the only weapon available to them, Shahada bombing
strikes. Western media learnt what the term “Intifada” meant. It
is high time it knew what ‘Shahada” is. It is the noblest form of
self-sacrifice. Palestinian young men and women, as young as sixteen, do not
fear death. The level of their courage defies Western logic.
The concept of Shahada is alien to
Western mentality. They call it “suicide bombing”. American Jewish
media cynically call it “homicide bombing”. The idea of self-sacrifice
is so incomprehensible to the materialistic Western mindset that they can
only see it as an act of desperation, of someone with no interest in living.
It cannot be seen as an act of self-denial ; a sacrifice by one for the sake
of all. It is a unique concept that has no parallel in Western culture.
Therefore, it has to be looked at as an abnormal phenomenon.
Westerners cannot understand the idea
that an individual dies in order that his family and his people may live.
Palestinians suffer no shortage of young people willing to sacrifice their
own lives for their stolen country.
According to the Palestinian centre
for Human rights, more than 50% of the population is under 19 years of age
and population growth is about 5%. So, there will be no shortage of Shahada
strikers. Zionists will always be up against a weapon for which there is no
defence.
The growing hatred of Jews is not
confined to young Palestinians. Young people all over the world are coming
to grips with the facts about Jewish atrocities in Palestine and the Jewish
danger in their own countries. A recent survey by the Institute of Jewish
and Community Research in San Francisco gives us indications that the world
is waking up to the danger of extremist Jewish supremacists, who want to
control us. The Washington Post, which is a Jewish-controlled
newspaper, is sounding the alarm to all Jews. It published the findings of
the survey in an article on 21 January, 2003 saying:
“Anti-Semitism may be increasing in
the United States as more young adults express bigoted views about Jews than
do middle-aged Americans, according to a national poll. On question after
question, researchers found that the proportion of Americans ages 18 to 35
who held anti-Semitic views was consistently higher than the percentage of
middle-aged Americans who shared those attitudes.
For example, nearly one in four young
adults, 23 percent, agreed with the statement that Jews were a
‘threat’ to the country's ‘moral character’, a view shared by 15
percent of Americans between ages 45 and 54. And 20 percent of young
adults agreed that Jews ‘care only about themselves’, compared with 12
percent of middle-aged Americans.”.
In my opinion, such awakening is due
to the ease of obtaining information via the wonderful flow of the Internet.
Gone are the days when the BBC or CNN were the main sources of news,
dissipating misinformation and shaping public opinion. I recall an anecdote
at the time of the qualifying games for the Soccer World Cup of 1998. Iran
had been demonised by the Jew-controlled Western media for years; still is
being demonised by George W. Bush and the Jews in control of the US
administration. Australia played Iran away in Tehran on 22 November 1997.
The amazed Australian soccer commentator “Les Murray” could not help
express his astonishment at the difference between the real Iran he was
witnessing and the distorted image the Jewish American media painted for
him. He couldn’t help frequently reiterating that sentiment during the
relay of the match to Australia. He was amazed and impressed by the
discipline and sportsmanship of the crowds and the general way of life as he
saw it.
By the same token the Jewish Western
media has depicted the Palestinians as savages who kill themselves because
of their ‘fanatic Moslem indoctrination’ and the promise of a lavish
lifestyle in Heaven. This level of distortion is no longer possible. The
Internet is choking the filthy Jew-controlled mass media. I receive stacks
of e-mail messages and addresses of Internet sites showing profound
understanding of the global Jewish conspiracy, which is not just a theory.
It is a fact unfolding before our very eyes.
Palestine lies in the region between
the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, not on the disjointed bits
offered in phoney perpetual peace talks. Historical precedent dictates that
Palestinians will free their land. Until then, there will be no respite in
the letting of blood on both sides. Jews have only themselves to blame.
My prediction that Israel is a doomed
project is not based on my own wishful thinking; it is based on historical
precedent. History tells us that whenever you have an oppressed people
willing to stand up and fight for their freedom, the end result is victory
for the disenfranchised.
The French were driven out of Algeria.
The indigenous blacks of South Africa freed their country from the white
apartheid regime. History has a habit of repeating itself. Peoples and
nations also have the bad habit of not heeding the lessons of history.
To my mind, the freedom of the
Palestinian people from their Zionist oppressors may be much closer than the
freedom of their fellow Arabs from their backward, corrupt rulers.
_________________________________
(1) Righteous Victims, Benny Morris, p. 83
(2) Ibid, p. 83
(3) The Birth of the Palestine Problem
1947-1949, Benny Morris, p. 170
(4) Chaim Weissman, chairman of the
British Zionist Committee,
New
York Times, 28 February 1919.
(5) Expulsion of the Palestinians, Nur
Masalha, p. 159
