Filthy Jewish Lies about Iran

Dr. Patrick H. McNally -
Deholyhoaxotoxifier and anti-Semitist [not anti-Semite]

Elite Jewry has had millennia of experience lying and deceiving and consequently have become very shrewd and clever at fooling their own sheeple and the cattle goyim. Their all-time favorite ploy is to accuse others of doing exactly what they themselves are doing. They often talk peace like Jesus [an important Jew] but act like Jack the Ripper [another Jew]. That is why ZNN and other Jewish WMD [weapons of mass deception] are best avoided.

Nevertheless, when the joosmedia began to spread tales about Iranian President Ahmadinejad, my interest was aroused because several views attributed to him made a lot of sense. For example, the joosmedia whined that Admadinejad wanted to wipe Israel off the map. “Whow! What a great idea! An end to world history`s most vicious state terrorist government,” [I thought.] But alas a little investigation revealed that the President made no such suggestion.

He merely suggested that Palestinians be allowed to return to their villages and homes from which European Jews had ethnically cleansed them in the real Palestinian Holocaust. He further proposed that a referendum then be held in Israel in which Jews and Gentiles would vote on the type of government they wanted to have: a “Jews Only” apart-hate state or a one-man one-vote democracy. Of course, such a plebiscite might well mean that Nerutei Karta goal would be attained, i.e. the peaceful dismantling of the JewState [Teddy Herzl`s term meaning “a state of the Jews, by the Jews, and for the Jews”], but that cannot fairly be described as “wiping Israel off the map.” It is simply pointing out that Isrealhell has little if any right to be on the map.

Unfortunately, Ahmadinejad has not yet called for an international UN sponsored boycott, blockade and bombing of Israel. It is not Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Egypt, Panama, or North Korea that should be bombed, but Israel.

A second idea attributed to Ahmadinejad by ZNN [Zionist News Media] is that he flat out denies that the Germans gassed, barbequed, baked, fried or sent 6,000,000 Jews up in chimney smoke. “Great, incredible! At last an important statesman is standing up to the hoaxoco$t liars and profiteers!” [I naively thought.] Imagine my disappointment after researching the matter. “Researching” here means simply reading what Ahmadinejad himself had actually said rather than what some elite joosmedia liar or some Israeli-financed translation service said that he said.

It turns out that the Iranian President is not at all a holocaust denier but simply a skeptic or supporter of revisionism. There are holocaust affirmers, revisionists, and deniers. The hoaxoco$t affirmers say, “”Thou shalt believe in the Church of the Holocaust or off to the slammer with you!” Revisionists say, “Wait a minute! There are some minor details or even major factors that have to be looked at.” [“Revision” = “re” {once again} + “vision” {look at}] Hoaxoco$t deniers say, “There is a hoax in the hoaxoco$t. The whole thing is just a filthy unfounded blood libel and should not be discussed by ridiculed.” For example, World War II revisionists do not deny that something plausibly called “World War II” happened. The want to revise it and not deny it. However, witch deniers are like Holocaust deniers. They do not simply want to refine or tweak a concept.

Actually, Ahmadinejad is closest to Norman Finkelstein because the two of them are mainly concerned about political abuses and war crimes committed in the name of the holocaust. Both are less interested in whether the holyhoax hullabaloo has any basis in historical reality. Finkelstein called the holocaust “Israel`s prize alibi” but he is a holocaust affirmer. Ahmadinejad does suggest that scientific on-the-spot forensic investigations be carried out for the first time. Who could rationally object to that? Perhaps some people fear the results of such forensic investigations?

But it is clear that Ahmadinejad is not up to snuff about important aspects of the holocaust narrative. For example, at a meeting in New York with the Council on Foreign Relations, he was confronted by an insurance executive who claimed that he had seen the Dachau Concentration Camp as Germany fell. Ahmadinejad reportedly asked the executive how old he was. He should have replied, “You saw Dachau? So what! Dachau is no evidence whatsoever for anything to do with the holocaust. I may have seen the Shroud of Turin but that does not prove that Jesus rose from the dead. The Resurrection of Jesus and the Holocaust of the Jews are religious beliefs. Believe what you want but do not use an Inquisition to impose your beliefs on others!”

A third anti-Iranian smear being foisted on Ahmadinejad is the ridiculous claim that he mocks the memory of holocaust victims, survivors, believers, whatever. However, it is impossible to mock the memory of people who could not have died in a purely fictional mass murder. It is very possible and even praiseworthy to mock the defective memory of pilfering, profiteering liars.

A fourth Jewish lie encountered in the media is not anti-Iranian at all. One meets it among leftish Jews who even seem to vigorously oppose the war mongering dragging us into an attack on Iran. But these Jews never point to Israel or America`s Jewish fifth column as the driving forces behind the coming war against Iran. Just as these comic book Marxists or fake anarchists blamed the 15-year long massacre of the Iraqi people on “big oil,” American capitalism, or a faceless military-industrial complex, they now blame the expansion of Israel`s anti-Islamic war on amorphous institutions and mostly unnamed individuals. The most shameless and culpable of these Jewish deceivers is probably Numb Chumsky, although readers could nominate other candidates.

A recent piece by Stephen Gowans is a good example of Jewish attempts at damage control. Gowans writes,

a.) “It’s true that Iran’s developing an independent nuclear power industry would furnish the country with the potential to develop nuclear weapons, but this amounts to nothing more than a defensive threat to a small class of financiers, high-level executives and corporate lawyers whose common interests lead them to rally around the idea that Iranian oil should be under US control and made available to the project of enlarging the capital of US oil companies.”

b.) “Today, US oil companies have no presence in Iran. Major sectors of the economy, including oil, telecommunications, transportation, as well as banking and finance, are in state hands, as prescribed by the country’s constitution.”

c.) “It is a threat to the minority of owners and high-level executives in the US who look to Iran, and particularly its oil, as a field for profit-making opportunities, and who, moreover, are perfectly willing to throw young, working class kids, into the service of securing it for them through the sacrifice of their bodies and lives if necessary. But the prospects for success against a nuclear-armed Iran are not what the prospects for success were in invading an effectively disarmed Iraq, and that venture has proved to be a disaster for the US capitalist class.”

However, Gowans makes a very interesting comment and concession in his final paragraph where he writes, “Iran poses no threat, either to the US or Israel, other than the threat of potential self-defense. The claims that the country’s leadership mocks the Holocaust and seeks nuclear weapons to carry out a genocide against Jews is pure nonsense, concocted, like the mythical stories of Saddam Hussein’s hidden weapons of mass destruction and ties to al-Qaeda, to justify another conquest of an economically nationalist oil-rich state.”

This crucial final conclusion gives Gowans` game away and shows him to be nothing but a Jewish shill. He mentions here:

1. a threat to Israel,

2. mocking the holocaust, and

3. a genocide against the Jews as “nonsense concocted” to justify the coming war.

Now let us correlate the three items of nonsense concocted to justify the war with three institutions that Gowans says are driving us to war. The nonsense concocted consists of three Jewish issues. But Gowans never mentions Jews among the big players behind the drive to war. Does “big oil” gives a rat`s rectum about mocking the holocaust? Do American capitalists give two hoots about the JewState? Is the American military-industrial complex worried about genocide against the Jews?

Gowans is quite correct in dismissing the phony Jewish concerns as “concocted nonsense,” but why does he not point to the obvious fact that the concocters and promoters of this nonsense are all -or largely- Jews.
Many Gentiles privately mock the holocaust, would love to see the JewState bulldozed into the Mediterranean, and worry about genocides committed BY Jews and not at all about genocides AGAINST Jews. The only people worried about genocides against Jews are skillful fundraisers at the ADL [American Defamation League] and hucksters at Hoaxoco$t museums.

It looks more and more as if:

1. Israel will once again use nuclear blackmail against the JewAssA to force it to attack Iran [“Either the UAssA attacks Iran with conventional weapons or the JewState attacks it with nuclear weapons!] or

2. Isrealhell uses a false flag operation to attack the American “sitting duck” armada now being assembled off the Iranian coast and then blames the attack on Iran or

3. the JewState will jump the gun and nuke Iran and then whine, “But, Oiy veh!, Israel has the right to defend itself.”

But if there is a just God in heaven or elsewhere, he has certainly provided Iran with enough top quality Russian made “firecrackers” to stuff down the smokestacks at Dimona and incinerate the terrorist JewState in its own nuclear arsenal. As a famous Jewish rabbi once said, “He who takes the sword will perish by the sword.”