From: Andrew Winkler
- editor@therebel.org
Sent: Saturday, 8 July 2006 6:15 AM
Subject: Re: Poor Germans - Jews love NEW GERMANY enslaved by
'HOLOCAUST' LIE
This
new found love of the ‘Lobby’ for Germany is obviously highly
suspicious.
I
bet it has something to do with Angela Merkel’s last visit to
the US. Did anybody see the pictures of George W. Bush parading
her on the WJC meeting? She obviously felt very uncomfortable.
My
gut feeling is that she had struck some kind of ‘Stalin Pakt’
with the lobby about giving Germany a break in return for her
support against Iran. Not surprisingly, Germany’s role in the G3
negotiations on the Iran nukes issue has recently shifted from
that of a ‘honest broker’ to becoming an extension of
Anglo-Judean imperialism.
Personally, I’m disgusted with how Merkel is repaying President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the huge favour he has made Germany in
questioning - on an international level - the veracity of the
Holocaust. But then again, maybe that’s all part and parcel of
it.
Maybe the message of the Zionists to Germany is, ‘Don’t go down
that path. We’ll be nice to you from now on, but you got to help
us with those nasty Iranians.’
Andrew Winkler
Editor/Publisher
ZioPedia – A Rebel Media Group Project
_____________________________
Mel Fowler is RIGHT -
From:
Mel Fowler [mailto:mel.fo@verizon.net]
Sent: Saturday, 8 July 2006 7:23 AM
Subject: THE NEW AND BENIGN GERMANS
Those Jews who have moved to Germany and are tickled pink to find that Germans now warmly accept them, seemingly to have been drained of old antipathies toward Jews, have perhaps failed to consider the possibility that they are the victims of the inverse of a deception which they, themselves, perfected long ago and which they have relied on from the beginning of the Jewish diaspora: that is to say, the systematic,
rigorous suppression of any demonstration of hostility toward non-Jews, along with intentionally "fronting" themselves with displays of warm acceptance of their non-Jewish neighbors and their love for living in a non-Jewish community.
Have Germans really forgotten the cruel injuries inflicted upon themselves after they lost the War? Have they forgotten the inexpressibly vile insults to Germans of the Holocaust lies? If they have forgotten these things, that can be accounted for only as a pathological and necessary accommodation to present circumstances, including the return of the Jews to Germany.
----- Original Message -----
From: Adelaide Institute
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 3:48 AM
Subject: Poor Germans - Jews love NEW GERMANY enslaved by 'HOLOCAUST' LIE
From: Josef K.J. Schwanzer
M.A. -
donauschwob@optusnet.com.au
Sent: Friday, 7 July 2006
Subject: The Forward Newspaper Online Jewish Cheers for
Deutschland
_________________________________
From:
C M - danielleceleste@hotmail.com
Friday, July 07,
2006
Foxman says "Never Again," but it's the same old story
Abraham Foxman
is the director of the Anti-Defamation League [ADL],
an organization that claims to protect various
groups from defamation, which is loosely defined as
insult, slander, libel, denigration or vilification.
The ADL was founded more than eighty years ago and
has engaged in an ongoing and concerted campaign to
commit exactly the type of behavior it alleges to
protect people from ever since. The primary focus of
the ADL’s ire has traditionally been European
Americans, but recently it has changed its focus to
include Arabs and Muslims, a result of the “War on
Terrorism,” and Israel’s need to convince Americans
and Europeans that Islam is their mortal enemy.
In reality, the ADL is nothing more than a political
arm of organized world Jewry, Zionism, for the faint
of heart. It is essentially an organization that is
designed to smear the reputation of those that dare
question the motives of Jewry and often, individual
Jews acting out of sheer selfishness or on behalf of
their co-ethnics. The ADL has the ear of government,
the judiciary and law enforcement, it has managed to
insert itself in these venues by claiming to
represent the underdog, which is generally
understood to mean minorities in our present day and
age.
The ADL engages in defamation, in fact it has
mastered the art of defamation – it can and does
defame anyone that attempts to bring attention to
issues that organized Jewry wants kept under wraps.
Interestingly, Foxman and the ADL aren’t in the
least bit hesitant to engage in this type of
disingenuous behavior, in fact they do so in the
open, relying on the media, which is
disproportionately owned, operated and managed by
ethnic Jews to convey to the world the ADL’s goal
while at the same time suppressing the League’s
defamatory techniques. This blatantly biased
approach enables the ADL to publicly question the
veracity of the Russia President Vladimir Putin and
the Russian government when it indicts and imprisons
the thieving Oligarch’s who stole tens of billions
of dollars from the Russian people in the 1990s,
without revealing to Americans the overwhelming
evidence that said Oligarch’s did so criminally and
with extreme malice of forethought. The Oligarch’s
were able to borrow incredible sums of money from
their American co-ethnics in order to carry out this
crime, something else that the ADL has successfully
hidden from the American public. The undeniable fact
is, every Oligarch under indictment or in prison
today in Russia is guilty of treason, they acted
against the best interests of their own countrymen;
they did this with the assistance of what amounts to
a Jewish international finance network, and they did
so to further their own selfish interests and the
interests of organized Jewry. For this reason the
ADL has worked openly and behind the scenes to
pressure the Russian President to release these Jews
and more importantly to allow them to keep their ill
gotten gains. What’s important to understand is that
the establishment media and the ADL worked hand in
hand, once again the media pushes the ADL’s agenda
without divulging uncomfortable facts associated
with what the ADL’s actual agenda is.
Fortunately Foxman has been overly aggressive of
late and has exposed the ADL to a tremendous amount
of public scrutiny, which has exposed him and the
ADL for what they really are, agents of organized
Jewry. As mentioned previously, the ADL has been
around for some time, it has exposed itself in the
past, when it was found guilty of defamation in a
case involving a couple that allegedly cast some
anti-Semitic aspersions on a Jew that had nothing to
do with the organization, the ADL flexed its muscle
and went after the couple, smearing them and
attacking their reputations. A court found the ADL
guilty of this and fined them, but most Americans
have never heard of the case, the Jewish media
neglected to cover it at any length. The ADL too has
been implicated in espionage, it used its law
enforcement contacts to dig up incriminating
information on its enemies, which are legion, and
then used that information to smear or defame them,
for this reason and many others, some people have
suggested that the ADL change its moniker to the
Defamation League. This case too received almost no
attention in the mainstream media, further evidence
that the media acts in the best interests of Jews at
the ADL and the ADL acts in the best interests of
the Jewish media. One example of this, is the
absolute fact that Foxman and the ADL literally jump
all over anyone the moment they suggest that Jews
have a disproportionate influence in the media
and/or Hollywood, which is in reality just another
media outlet. The Reverend Ted Pike recently noted
that one of the primary goals of the new Office of
Anti-Semitism [Yes such a entity actually exists] at
the Department of State is to link any suggestion
that the media is dominated by Jews, with virulent
anti-Semitism, a hate crime if Foxman and the ADL
have anything to do with it. Foxman too emphasizes
this connection in his book Never Again, a tome
devoted to elaborating on the many alleged thought
crimes directed against Jewry, he notes in a classic
admission and denial manner:
“It’s even true that, proportionately, there has
always been a relatively prominent Jewish presence
in the movie, TV, and record industries, for a
variety of social and cultural reasons.”[1]
The fact is,
and Foxman knows this better than anyone else,
ethnic Jews have a virtual stranglehold on the
media, in its many facets, which includes all of
entertainment television and most importantly, the
televised news media.
Foxman’s use of the words “prominent Jewish
presence,” is an understatement, ethnic Jews are so
over-represented in the media, that they constitute
nothing less than a majority, which is indeed
strange and disproportionate for a demographic that
constitute less than 3% of the entire American
population. Consider the following:
Writing of the initial merger of Time, Inc. with
Warner, Jewish writer Michael Wolff said in New York
magazine in 2001 “since Time Inc.'s merger with
Warner ten years ago, one of the interesting
transitions is that it has become a Jewish company.”
[“From AOL to W,” New York magazine, January 29,
2001]
Disney, the world’s second largest media
conglomerate was managed by Jewish CEO Michael
Eisner for decades, Eisner made it his mission to
corrupt anything and everything the founder of
Disney, Walt Disney ever stood for. Disney was
founded as a family entertainment program, but by
the time Eisner left the company, Disney had
produced programs of such filth and degeneracy that
Disney can in no way be considered a network devoted
to family entertainment. Eisner resigned a year ago
and was replaced by another Jew, who has carried on
Eisner’s depraved legacy.
The third largest media conglomerate is Viacom, and
its headed by Sumner Redstone, a Jew born Murray
Rothstein.
Edgar Bronfman Jr., another Jew, acquired NBC in a
merger several years ago; he additionally
monopolizes the recording industry, and owns
Interscope records too, which is probably the
largest producer of “Gangsta Rap,” in the world.
Fox Entertainment is headed by Rupert Murdoch, who
is allegedly a Gentile, but I can tell you for
certain, his background is obscured, this author
spent a rather substantial sum of money three years
ago in an attempt to trace Murdoch’s pedigree, and
what I found was that his mother’s ancestry could
not be verified one way or another. I was unable to
prove Elisabeth Joy Greene was a Jew, but nor was I
able to confirm that she wasn’t. According to Jewish
Law, the child born of a Jewish womb is a Jew. In
any case, Murdoch relies on a Jew named Peter
Chernin to actually conduct the day-to-day business
at Fox, so in essence, Jews have a prominent
position at Fox too.
So there you have it, there are the facts. The three
largest television media conglomerates are for all
intents and purposes in the hands of ethnic Jews.
Another well-known Jewish television entertainment
personality named Ben Stein had this to say about
the prevalence of Jews in the media industry:
At mighty Paramount, the controlling stockholder is
Sumner Redstone. Head of the studio is Jon Dolgen.
Head of production is Sherry Lansing--all members of
the tribe. At titanic Disney, the CEO is Michael
Eisner, the world's most assimilated Jew, who might
as well be a Presbyterian. Deputy head is Michael
Ovitz, karate champ but also a Jew. Head of the
studio is Joe Roth. At newly energized ICM, the top
dogs are Jeff Berg and Jim Wiatt. At still
overwhelming CAA, Jack Rapke and other members of my
faith predominate. At William Morris, Jon Burnham
and other Jews are, by and large, in the power
positions. This has always been true in Hollywood.
The ex-furriers who created Hollywood were Eastern
European Jewish immigrants, and all of the great
edifice of fantasy-making in Hollywood is their
handiwork. Names like Zukor and Lasky and Goldwyn
and Cohn are the foundation of mass culture in
America and the world.[2]
Stein took it a
step further by citing the fact that Hollywood,
which as we now know is predominantly controlled by
Jews, after all a Jew admitted it, has in fact had
what is probably the greatest impact on western
culture than any other factor in the last century.
Foxman would deny it, but nonetheless it’s true, our
perception of the world is largely the result of
Hollywood’s impact on our culture, therefore,
deductive logic demands that we recognize the fact
that Jewry has had a considerable effect on how we
view the world around us.
At this point it’s worth considering what Abraham
Foxman has to say about anti-Semitism, he refers to
it as a “virus,” a “disease,” a “plague,” a “hate
crime,” but not once in his book Never Again does he
even suggest that it might be a viable defense
mechanism, a reaction to Jewish misbehavior, but
that is in fact what it is. Edgar Steele a
well-known Idaho attorney states that “anti-Semitism
is a disease, you catch it from Jews.” Of course
Steele isn’t well thought of by Foxman, in fact the
ADL maintains a list of so called anti-Semites on
its website and Steele is included on its
illustrious list. Foxman also predictably foists the
absolutely ridiculous idea that anti-Semitism is
“fundamentally irrational,” on the reader. This is
an old tactic that has been successfully utilized in
the past, so why change something that works? The
same folks that promote this idea, also embrace the
idea that violence is always irrational, which
sounds nice and gives one a warm fuzzy feeling
inside, but it flies in the face of logic
/rationality. The truth of the matter is, the
decision to engage in violence in order to protect
ones life, family, nation, may be the most rational
decision one will ever have the chance to make in
this life. One could easily argue that allowing
oneself and/or one’s family members to be harmed or
killed, without engaging in violence in order to
stop it, is “fundamentally irrational.” However,
this is not a distinction these people make, their
doctrinaire approach is simple, “violence is always
irrational.” I suggest that accepting this point of
view is irrational, illogical and foolish. In this
vein, there is nothing irrational about recognizing
and speaking out about the very real influence Jews
wield in this country, and the fact of the matter
is, it would be extremely irrational not to do so,
especially if one had concluded that said influence
is in fact quite real. Likening scrutiny of a
group’s collective behavior to a “disease,” reveals
not “sound logic,” but an irrationality that knows
no bounds.
Foxman’s entire thesis in Never Again centers around
the idea that anti-Semitism is the “most resilient
form of hatred known to humankind.”[3]
Foxman does his best to corner the market on victim
hood for Jews, sure he pays other minorities lip
service, but make no mistake about it, Foxman is
first and foremost concerned with Jewry, he just
exploits other minorities in an effort to extract
the last remnant of sympathy remaining in the
Gentile population, especially the white Gentile
population.
I highly encourage readers to go to the library and
check out Foxman’s book. Don’t buy it; that would
only enrich this shyster. I absolutely guarantee
that your library has it on its shelf; I can
guarantee that with as much certainly as I can that
you won’t find any books critical of Jewry or
Zionism, or any books associated with non-kosher
historical revisionism. By reading Foxman’s book
with a critical eye, one unclouded by manufactured
guilt and/or foolish sentiments, the reader will see
what amounts to one gigantic and preposterous lie,
from front to back, Foxman is nothing less that a
modern day Ilya Ehrenburg.[4]
The ADL is the
organization most responsible for the emergence of
modern “hate crime,” legislation, and its
inequitable and nearly exclusive application against
the white majority in the United States. As a rule,
whites aren’t committing the greatest proportion of
so called “hate crimes,” crimes committed against
one group by another and motivated by bias and/or
prejudice, blacks are. Most readers inherently know
this, after all, few people with a firm grip on
reality would argue today that the black community
doesn’t harbor some hard feelings against white
society, many people recognize this reality, most
blacks and a few whites even sympathize with the
black community for the inequity they have suffered
from as a result of racism and prejudice. If one
concurs with the preceding sentence, one can then
accept the fact that blacks might engage in crimes
that target whites as a result of this animosity.
The fact of the matter is, according to our own
Justice Department, blacks commit murder at a rate
seven times that of whites.[5]
Even this statistic is highly illusory, as Hispanics
are included as White in the gathering and analysis
of these crime statistics, thus giving the erroneous
impression that white Europeans are committing more
crimes than they in fact are. Despite this, blacks
still clearly are committing more than fifty percent
of the murders in this country – this is not a
“racist,” statement or opinion, this is an empirical
fact backed up by statistics gathered by the federal
government.[6]
Foxman himself
admits the ADL’s role in the development and
implementation of unfair and highly biased “hate
crimes,” legislation in the United States:
“Forty-two states and the District of Columbia
currently have some form of hate crime law on the
books that enables prosecutors to seek increased
penalties when a victim is targeted in a bias crime.
Most of these laws are based on model legislation
originally drafted by ADL in 1981.”[7]
The fact of the
matter is organized Jewry, the ADL being one element
of, is almost exclusively the primary advocate of
such laws. Sure, many minorities also support the
statutes believing they may benefit from them in
some manner, but the fact of the matter is, Jews are
the primary propelling force behind the laws as
evidenced by Foxman’s above statement. The
predominantly Jewish media itself focuses on crimes
committed by whites; examples are numerous, all one
need do is watch television. One recent and more
importantly, titillating example, is the alleged
rape of a black stripper by an entire Lacrosse team
composed of upper class white students from Duke
University. The entire case is a farce, it’s nothing
more than a modern day example of the Tawana Brawley
case of the 1980s in which a black teen was
allegedly raped by several “racist,” whites that
scrawled racial epithets on her body, including a
swastika [Oh my] using human feces. That case was
proven to be a hoax, and the same will prove true
with the Duke Lacrosse rape. As a rule, white males
just don’t rape black females, not in this day and
age, it is extremely rare, almost unheard of, but
that still hasn’t stopped the media from making a
circus of the alleged incident.[8]
In the end,
Abraham Foxman’s book should be carefully and
unemotionally studied by those interested in Jewish
influence, but to fully understand and appreciate
the impact of Never Again, one must also investigate
the history of Jewish influence in Europe and the
United States. Foxman wrote Never Again with an
agenda in mind, it isn’t new, it isn’t unique, it’s
part and parcel of a tried and true strategy that
has worked for Foxman and his predecessors, make the
majority feel guilty for their support of
persecution against minorities real and imagined,
and then support the expected result, minority
dissent and derision against the majority by
convincing the minority that they are in fact
victims of the majority. Machiavellism at its
finest. In such an environment, what collective
group can stand against Foxman’s real agenda, the
advancement of the interests of organized Jewry,
Zionism for the faint of heart.
Curt Maynard
________________________
Connecting The Dots - Zionists & 911
By Douglas Herman
Exclusive to Rense.com
7-7-6
"The war in Iraq was conceived by 25
neoconservatives, most of them Jewish, who are
pushing President Bush to change the course of
history."
-Ari Shavit Ha'aretz News Service (Israel)
April 5, 2003
Masterful Plan Or Masterful Crime?
Was it only a coincidence that so many rich and
powerful Jewish Americans played a pivotal role, or
performed a supporting role in the alleged
"terrorist attack" on September 11, 2001 and the
"War on Terror" that followed? Likewise, under
closer scrutiny, why do we find so many Israelis, in
the exact same locations as the alleged Islamic
plotters and terrorists? Curious coincidence or
clever design?
For nearly five years we have been permitted a
piecemeal glimpse, partial views of 9-11, but
without seeing the bigger picture. Is there a Big
Picture, you ask? This essay will attempt to connect
the dots, identify some of the curious players,
individuals and groups who, quite often, seemed to
serve a dual loyalty. The peculiar irony was the
principle loyalty seemed to be to Israel.
Let us begin with what we know. Later we shall
speculate. Still later we shall draw logical
conclusions.
What does the masterful motto, "By Way of Deception
Thou Shalt Do War," mean to the average
American? Surprisingly, most Americans have never
heard of the Mossad motto.
It means a war within a war, enclosed by a greater
deceptive war. If you understand the clever goals
and can comprehend the tactics, one then might begin
to grasp the bigger picture. We might then begin to
understand 9-11 and all that happened since and
continues to happen.
The clues abound; the players still enjoy the
spotlight; many have enriched themselves; others
have been awarded honors, medals and lofty
positions. Almost all those lofty positions and
awards were awarded by other like themselves. Those
awards and accolades were paid for with the blood,
sweat, toil and tears of others.
By Way of Deception
Wealthy Zionist Larry
Silverstein built World Trade Center Building 7 in
1985. The building was part of the WTC complex,
owned by the New York Port Authority. WTC-7,
ostensibly a US government building, housed offices
of the Office of Emergency Management (OEM) Secret
Service, CIA and Security & Exchange Commission
(SEC). Late in the afternoon of September 11, 2001
Larry Silverstein, for all intents and purposes, had
WTC-7 demolished.
Only months before, well-connected Zionist Lewis
Eisenberg, Chairman of the New York Port Authority,
which owned the WTC, leased the complex for 99 years
to fellow Zionist Silverstein. How or why that
transaction took place was never discussed. At the
time, the WTC was considered, by many, as an
architectural white elephant and less than desirable
piece of real estate.
Meanwhile, well-connected Zionists had attained top
positions of power throughout the Bush
administration, and within the three branches of the
US government. Many had signed a sort of Globalist
Declaration of Independence. The document mirrored
an earlier Israeli manifesto. The signers slowly
consolidated power in America, unbeknownst to most
Americans.
The PNAC-Project for The New American Century -- was
first written by Zionists in Israel as an Israeli
policy papers, "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for
Securing the Realm," before becoming an important
blueprint for foreign policy here. Many of the same
authors contributed to both papers. On the surface
both papers seem pragmatic, almost admirable, filled
with diplomatic language. Yet if we understand the
motives and comprehend the methods-By Way of
Deception -- we may discern the Big Picture.
Douglas Feith ascended to
power at the Pentagon, as did fellow Zionists Paul
Wolfowitz, Dov Zakheim and Richard Perle. Most, if
not all, of these top military strategists curiously
possessed dual passports: Israeli and US passports.
"He served Likud interests," said Colonel
Karen Kwiatkowski of her superior, Douglas Feith,
head of the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans (OSP).
"I don't think those are the same as Israel's
interests, but instead those of a faction within
Israel. He engineered Likud (Right wing Israeli
party) outlined and desired actions by the US and,
in Feith's mind, I think he did it for Israel. I
just don't have any countervailing information that
would suggest he has ever done anything for
America."
Likewise what role did
Wolfowitz play? And Perle? And Zakheim? All Pentagon
top officials. How does one hold a foreign passport
— Israeli -- while holding Top Secret US security
clearances? Does anyone see a conflict of interests
here? One could argue these men were great patriots
-- but for which country? Philosophically they all
shared the same goal: Strengthen Israel; weaken the
tyrannical Islamic states; hasten US hegemony of
scarce resources for key global players and
multinationals.
And they all worked at the Pentagon. If America was
ever to be attacked -- perhaps by a team of Islamic
fanatics -- what better symbolic target than the
Pentagon? Curiously, only a year before, the
Pentagon had war-gamed just such an attack. You
would have thought someone would have been prepared.
The Underlings
The alleged Israeli art students in Hollywood,
Florida (They sold cheap Chinese art) lived on the
EXACT same street, only blocks from the alleged
Islamic hijackers (who flunked flight school). What
were the odds of that happening? Was
there a shared connection, a common link, a series
of dots perhaps (strip clubs)? Or was it simply a
massive coincidence that a team of possible Mossad
double agents posing as art students, lived blocks
away from alleged Islamic fanatics who just happened
to train next to US military bases?
What about those dancing
Israeli furniture movers in Liberty State Park? They
filmed the event from atop their white van, while
celebrating the successful attack. Later, two other
vans were stopped in key access points to
Manhattan. The FBI kept these Israelis for weeks
before eventually releasing them. In the horrific
days following 9-11, other vans were stopped. Other
Israelis were arrested. Dogs detected traces of
explosives in the vans. If not for the vigilance of
local law enforcement officers in several states
(unlike the FBI), how many other targets in America
would have been destroyed?
The US media actually performed quite well for 24
hours following the attack. Unbelievably, even Fox
News.
"What is striking about Fox News Reporter Carl
Cameron's portrait of Israel's spy network in the
U.S. is the sheer vastness of his subject," wrote
Justin Raimondo, in The Terror Enigma: Israel and
the September 11 Connection, "In the months leading
up to 9/11, Cameron claimed Israel was waging a
covert war against its principal ally and
benefactor, the United States."
But aside from smaller newspaper, like the Bergen
Record, few reports of these obvious false
flag-black operations by Israeli double agents
appeared anywhere on cable news giants CNN, MSNBC or
Fox in subsequent weeks. Nor did the appear in the
mainstream newspapers. Why didn't they?
A quick glance at the masthead of any daily New York
newspaper reveals a preponderance of Jewish editors
and publishers. What was most revealing, after 9-11,
was not so much editorial reluctance but an
overwhelming self-censorship, a stony silence, by
all the New York City newspapers. They refused to
mention — EVER -- the probable connection of Israel
to the 9-11 attack. Even though seven prominent NYC
steel scrapers were demolished under exceedingly
suspicious circumstances, not ONE Judeo-centric
newspaper launched even a semblance of an
investigation. Given the fact that Israel possessed
the greater motive, means and opportunity to carry
out the 9-11 attack, one had to wonder about the
criminal complicity of the big New York dailies.
Other NYC periodicals went out of their way to
debunk any attempt to get at the truth. Periodicals
like Popular Mechanics, edited by a cousin of US
Homeland Security head, Michael Chertoff, mouthed
the official (Zionist) version of events. According
to every New York periodical, Islamic terrorists
hijacked the planes. How they attained the means,
not to mention the opportunity to attack, was rarely
broached.
Compromise security and you can conquer a city,
state or nation. The Trojan Horse being a good
example; America being another.
If indeed hijackers somehow
got past airport security cameras and avoided normal
flight check in procedures, wouldn't the suspicion
fall on the Israeli-owned security company at Logan
airport in Boston? How would hijackers have access
to gates and terminals otherwise? No Mainstream news
reports indicated hijackers got past airline
employees working flight check-in counters. Somehow
this remains a minor detail to the US media.
Even more suspicious,
regarding security, how exactly did Islamic
terrorists manage to gain access to the interior
structure of WTC-7, in order to place obvious
demolition charges? Wealthy real estate mogul and
Zionist Larry Silverstein, the new lessee of the
entire WTC complex, would have had final say in any
security, wouldn't he? Additionally, the WTC-7 was,
for all intents and purposes, a US government
building. How could an enormous building, housing
offices of the CIA, Secret Service and the SEC be
left unsecured---unless the new landlord chose the
"security" outfit.
Even more strange, flaming debris somehow scattered
across a city block from the collapsing Twin Towers
and set afire the 11th floor of WTC-7, where the SEC
was located. Why this floor? What was located there?
"Odds are the SEC records in WTC 7 that were
fortuitously destroyed when that building was
'pulled' included this bogus Brady Bond deal," wrote
Karl Schwarz.
"Our sources have informed us that there was a group
of ONI [Office of Naval Intelligence] working in
this part of the Pentagon (that was destroyed) that
were investigating the $120 billion Brady Bond scam
I have reported on recently."
A masterful crime or a diabolical yet masterful spy
operation? Probably both.
Instead of a terrorist attack, the crime begins to
look like a huge scam with billions in profits and
thousands dead.
If one were to examine this enormous evil iceberg
further, and not just the tip, one might discover a
monumental mass of icy Intelligence-connected
players below the surface. Very likely, the entire
WTC operation was a combination insurance scam
(Benefiting one wealthy Zionist), false flag
"terrorist" op (benefiting one Zionist nation), and
billion dollar gold heist (Benefiting various
operatives from many branches of intelligence
possibly). Difficult to believe the CIA and Secret
Service -- not to mention Giuliani's Office of
Emergency Management -- had NO prior knowledge of
the impending destruction of their offices.
According to the London Times: "The Comex metals
trading division of the New York Mercantile Exchange
kept 3,800 gold bars - weighing 12 tonnes and worth
more than $100 million (£70 million) - in vaults in
the building's basement. Comex also held almost
800,000 ounces of gold there on behalf of others,
with a value of about $220 million (worth more than
$560,000,000 today). It also held more than 102
million ounces of silver, worth $430 million (Worth
$1.5 billion today). The Bank of Nova Scotia, which
kept gold in the Comex vault, reported $200 million
of gold lost in the wreckage (Lost-!). Comex also
held precious metals for Chase Manhattan Bank, the
Bank of New York and Hong Kong and Shanghai
Banking."
Not surprisingly, one massive gold-filled truck was
discovered, crushed, in the tunnels below the WTC
complex. Perhaps, in the eight hours, between 9 AM
and 5 PM, when WTC-7 was demolished and Americans
were glued to televisions, horrified, masterful
planners heisted hundreds of millions in gold
bullion. Before Silverstein finally "pulled" the US
government building, that is.
Which leaves us only THREE
final questions: Who leased the building only months
before? Who hired security at Logan and the WTC? Who
covered up the subsequent crime in the US media, not
only in New York City but the nation?
Still not
convinced that key, dual-citizenship "Zionists"
played a pivotal part? Perhaps THE pivotal part? The
final footnote, indicating overwhelming involvement
in the 9-11 attack, and the subsequent power to
cover up any involvement, occurred 18 months later.
That signature event was the War with Iraq, launched
with whole-hearted White House, US Media and
Congressional support on March 18, 2003.
On Purim, a significant Jewish holiday, a day
signifying destruction of Israel's enemies.
Masterful.
USAF veteran, Amateur historian and student of
Spinoza and Thoreau, Douglas Herman questions
authority. Shouldn't you?
_________________________________
Brisbane, Australia
28 June 2006
Dr Töben
Ich möchte Ihnen mitteilen, auf was ich schon lange warte, und was mich sehr interessiert. Es sind die Terroristenakte der "Amerikaner" ... Panama Kanal, Columbia, Mexico, Zentralamewrica, besonders Guzman Arbenz in Guatemala, Panama, Count Bernadotte, Lumumba im Kongo, Tschombe, Katanga, die Heldenakte der CIA, Philippinen, Baralong & Nicosian schoss auf schiffbrüchige deutsche Seeleute, Altmark, Lansing; wie W.W.I manipuliert Lusitania, Britische Lords Carson, Spring Rice, John Foster Dulles verwandschaft mit Lansing, Brandeis mit Wilson & Colonel House, CFR, Sanhedrin, Zar Nicolaus' Verweigerung Asylum in England, Bank of England, Marconi Skandal, Julius & Ethel Rosenberg, Attentat auf Lincoln Rockwell, Helmut Stern 1944-47, Grenada, Chile's General Schneider Attentat, El Salvador Bischof Romero, Dominican Republic Massaker 1965, Kuba 1898, Korfanti in Schlesien 1918, Franzosiche Revolution 1789, Danton Marat Robespiere, President Wilson & Brandeis, Lloyd Geroge & Sasson, Orlando, Clemenceau & Mandel Rothschild, Egypten's Suez Kanal, Sir Alan Brooke 1944-45, Rhodes Scholarship, London School of Economics Plan, Cromwell 1650, Bernard Shaw, Alexandria & Arabi Pasha, Ashanti, Mahdi, Mutesi, Basuto, Chaka, Sanghay & Hausa, Oranien-Transvaal, 18B, Panama Skandal...
Mir schmerzt schon die Hand - Grüsse - Max Gistinger, 41 Willmington St, Newmarket 4051, Australia.

