POW of proxy-Germany

 

Medical doctor of the Army Reserve

Dr Rigolf Hennig

will begin a 9-month prison sentence on

10 July 2006 at 12:00 noon,

 

Address:

 

Dr Rigolf Hennig

Strafvollzugsanstalt Vechta

D - 49377 Vechta

Willohstrasse 13

Germany

 

Dr Hennig's crime? "disparaging the Federal Republic of Germany " by using Prof Carlo Schmidt's argument that the current German political entity is a creation and a mere occupied territory of the post World War Two Allies, and that the German Reich continues to exist but is merely inactive.

 

Dr Rigolf Hennig is a courageous patriot who refuses to submit to the poxy-German Federal Republic - come along on 10 July and celebrate with us as this German who fearlessly continues to fight for his cause - it is an explosive cause.

 

Come along to farewell Dr Hennig  as he begins his 9-month sentence as a POW 12:00 noon, 10 July 2006.

 

 

Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 11:07 PM

Subject: Kriegsgefangenschaft Rigolf Hennig


 

Deutsche, die ihr noch Deutsche sein wollt – Bürger des Deutschen Reiches!

 

 Unser Kamerad, der Oberstarzt der Reserve Rigolf Hennig muß am 

Montag den 10.Juli 2006 um 12.00 Uhr in der  

Strafvollzugsanstalt in 49377 Vechta – Willohstr. 13

für 9 Monate zur Kriegsgefangenschaft einrücken.

 

Rigolf Hennig wurde vom Landgericht Lüneburg in einem Schauprozeß wegen „Verunglimpfung der BRD“ zu 9 Monaten Haft ohne Bewährung verurteilt.  Er hatte sich auf den Staatsrechtler Carlo Schmidt berufen, der in seiner Rede vor dem Parlamentarischen Rat eine klare Begründung dafür gegeben hatte, warum die BRD kein Staat im staatsrechtlichen Sinne, sondern lediglich eine Organisationsform der Feindmächte ist.

 

Nachdem die Revision verworfen wurde und nun das sogenannte Bundesverfassungsgericht den Antrag auf eine Einstweilige Verfügung abgelehnt hat, ist das Urteil rechtskräftig geworden.

 Rigolf Hennig muß sich der Gewalt beugen und die Kriegsgefangenschaft antreten.

 

Zeigen wir unserem Kameraden daß er nicht alleine ist. Zeigen wir aber auch den Systemlingen, daß ihre Zeit abgelaufen ist.  

Deshalb kommt am Montag den 10.07.2006 um 12.00 zu Strafvollzugsanstalt in Vechta, Willohstr. 13, damit wir unseren Kameraden würdig in die Kriegsgefangenschaft begleiten können.

 

Mit reichstreuem Gruß,

Klaus Kaping

_________________________________

 

THE GRAND INSTANCE IS ACTIVE IN PARIS

 

From: Bocage - bocage@club-internet.fr

Sent: Friday, 7 July 2006 10:43 PM
Subject: Rappel du procès R. Faurisson du 11 juillet

 

 

This is just to confirm that Professor Robert Faurisson's trial will indeed take place on Tuesday 11 July, starting at 13:30 hours before the XVIIth Tribunal Correctionnel, Paris.


Supporters should be there quite early because the police security checks takes a long time. This is because there is only one entrance for two events: the people wanting to go to the Court as well as the people wanting to visit the Sainte-Chapelle.

The presiding judge will be Nicolas Bonnal, who is the vice-president of the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris.


We have just learnt, from a note coming from the CRIF (Conseil représentatif des Israélites de France - Representative counsel of French Jews), dated 5 July, that "For the second consecutive year, the Ecole Nationale de la Magistrature (ENM) (National college of magistrates, or judges) has invited Marc Knobel, a researcher of the CRIF, to participate in the continuous training of the ENM, which focuses this year on 'cybercriminality and offences against human dignity in Europe' and that "About fifty judges are attending that training", amongst whom the said Nicolas Bonnal!


_______________
 

Nous revenons sur nos messages des 14 mai et 21 juin 2006 pour confirmer à nos correspondants que le professeur Robert Faurisson comparaîtra bien le mardi 11 juillet, à 13h30, devant la XVIIe chambre du tribunal correctionnel de Paris.


Il est bon de se présenter à l'entrée du Palais de justice un bon moment avant l'ouverture des débats puisque les contrôles de police effectués à l'entrée du Palais se font à une porte unique où sont canalisés à la fois les justiciables et les touristes voulant visiter la Sainte-Chapelle.

L'audience sera présidée par Nicolas Bonnal, vice-président du Tribunal de grande instance de Paris.


Or nous venons d'apprendre, par une note du CRIF en date du 5 juillet, que "Pour la seconde année consécutive, l¹Ecole Nationale de la Magistrature (ENM) a convié Marc Knobel, Chercheur au CRIF, à participer à la formation continue de l¹ENM, qui porte cette année sur la 'Cybercriminalité et les atteintes à la dignité humaine en Europe' " et que "Une cinquantaine de magistrats français assistent à cette formation" dont ledit Nicolas Bonnal!

Que tous ceux qui le peuvent viennent!

 

_________________________________


From: Andrew Winkler -  editor@therebel.org
Sent: Saturday, 8 July 2006 6:15 AM
Subject: Re: Poor Germans - Jews love NEW GERMANY enslaved by 'HOLOCAUST' LIE


 

This new found love of the ‘Lobby’ for Germany is obviously highly suspicious.
 

I bet it has something to do with Angela Merkel’s last visit to the US. Did anybody see the pictures of George W. Bush parading her on the WJC meeting? She obviously felt very uncomfortable.
 

My gut feeling is that she had struck some kind of ‘Stalin Pakt’ with the lobby about giving Germany a break in return for her support against Iran. Not surprisingly, Germany’s role in the G3 negotiations on the Iran nukes issue has recently shifted from that of a ‘honest broker’ to becoming an extension of Anglo-Judean imperialism.
 

Personally, I’m disgusted with how Merkel is repaying President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad the huge favour he has made Germany in questioning - on an international level - the veracity of the Holocaust. But then again, maybe that’s all part and parcel of it.
 

Maybe the message of the Zionists to Germany is, ‘Don’t go down that path. We’ll be nice to you from now on, but you got to help us with those nasty Iranians.’

Andrew Winkler
Editor/Publisher
ZioPedia – A Rebel Media Group Project

 

_____________________________

 

Mel Fowler is RIGHT  -

 

From: Mel Fowler [mailto:mel.fo@verizon.net]
Sent: Saturday, 8 July 2006 7:23 AM
Subject: THE NEW AND BENIGN GERMANS

 

Are The New Germans Really New?

 

Those Jews who have moved to Germany and are tickled pink to find that Germans now warmly accept them, seemingly to have been drained of old antipathies toward Jews, have perhaps failed to consider the possibility that they are the victims of the inverse of a deception which they, themselves, perfected long ago and which they have relied on from the beginning of the Jewish diaspora: that is to say, the systematic, 

rigorous suppression of any demonstration of hostility toward non-Jews, along with intentionally "fronting" themselves with displays of warm acceptance of their non-Jewish neighbors and their love for living in a non-Jewish community. 

 

Have Germans really forgotten the cruel injuries inflicted upon themselves after they lost the War?  Have they forgotten the inexpressibly vile insults to Germans of the Holocaust lies?  If they have forgotten these things, that can be accounted for only as a  pathological and necessary accommodation to present circumstances, including the return of the Jews to Germany. 

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 3:48 AM

Subject: Poor Germans - Jews love NEW GERMANY enslaved by 'HOLOCAUST' LIE

From: Josef K.J. Schwanzer M.A. - donauschwob@optusnet.com.au
Sent: Friday, 7 July 2006
Subject: The Forward Newspaper Online Jewish Cheers for Deutschland

 

_________________________________

 

 From: C M -  danielleceleste@hotmail.com
Friday, July 07, 2006

Foxman says "Never Again," but it's the same old story

 

Abraham Foxman is the director of the Anti-Defamation League [ADL], an organization that claims to protect various groups from defamation, which is loosely defined as insult, slander, libel, denigration or vilification. The ADL was founded more than eighty years ago and has engaged in an ongoing and concerted campaign to commit exactly the type of behavior it alleges to protect people from ever since. The primary focus of the ADL’s ire has traditionally been European Americans, but recently it has changed its focus to include Arabs and Muslims, a result of the “War on Terrorism,” and Israel’s need to convince Americans and Europeans that Islam is their mortal enemy.

In reality, the ADL is nothing more than a political arm of organized world Jewry, Zionism, for the faint of heart. It is essentially an organization that is designed to smear the reputation of those that dare question the motives of Jewry and often, individual Jews acting out of sheer selfishness or on behalf of their co-ethnics. The ADL has the ear of government, the judiciary and law enforcement, it has managed to insert itself in these venues by claiming to represent the underdog, which is generally understood to mean minorities in our present day and age.

The ADL engages in defamation, in fact it has mastered the art of defamation – it can and does defame anyone that attempts to bring attention to issues that organized Jewry wants kept under wraps. Interestingly, Foxman and the ADL aren’t in the least bit hesitant to engage in this type of disingenuous behavior, in fact they do so in the open, relying on the media, which is disproportionately owned, operated and managed by ethnic Jews to convey to the world the ADL’s goal while at the same time suppressing the League’s defamatory techniques. This blatantly biased approach enables the ADL to publicly question the veracity of the Russia President Vladimir Putin and the Russian government when it indicts and imprisons the thieving Oligarch’s who stole tens of billions of dollars from the Russian people in the 1990s, without revealing to Americans the overwhelming evidence that said Oligarch’s did so criminally and with extreme malice of forethought. The Oligarch’s were able to borrow incredible sums of money from their American co-ethnics in order to carry out this crime, something else that the ADL has successfully hidden from the American public. The undeniable fact is, every Oligarch under indictment or in prison today in Russia is guilty of treason, they acted against the best interests of their own countrymen; they did this with the assistance of what amounts to a Jewish international finance network, and they did so to further their own selfish interests and the interests of organized Jewry. For this reason the ADL has worked openly and behind the scenes to pressure the Russian President to release these Jews and more importantly to allow them to keep their ill gotten gains. What’s important to understand is that the establishment media and the ADL worked hand in hand, once again the media pushes the ADL’s agenda without divulging uncomfortable facts associated with what the ADL’s actual agenda is.

Fortunately Foxman has been overly aggressive of late and has exposed the ADL to a tremendous amount of public scrutiny, which has exposed him and the ADL for what they really are, agents of organized Jewry. As mentioned previously, the ADL has been around for some time, it has exposed itself in the past, when it was found guilty of defamation in a case involving a couple that allegedly cast some anti-Semitic aspersions on a Jew that had nothing to do with the organization, the ADL flexed its muscle and went after the couple, smearing them and attacking their reputations. A court found the ADL guilty of this and fined them, but most Americans have never heard of the case, the Jewish media neglected to cover it at any length. The ADL too has been implicated in espionage, it used its law enforcement contacts to dig up incriminating information on its enemies, which are legion, and then used that information to smear or defame them, for this reason and many others, some people have suggested that the ADL change its moniker to the Defamation League. This case too received almost no attention in the mainstream media, further evidence that the media acts in the best interests of Jews at the ADL and the ADL acts in the best interests of the Jewish media. One example of this, is the absolute fact that Foxman and the ADL literally jump all over anyone the moment they suggest that Jews have a disproportionate influence in the media and/or Hollywood, which is in reality just another media outlet. The Reverend Ted Pike recently noted that one of the primary goals of the new Office of Anti-Semitism [Yes such a entity actually exists] at the Department of State is to link any suggestion that the media is dominated by Jews, with virulent anti-Semitism, a hate crime if Foxman and the ADL have anything to do with it. Foxman too emphasizes this connection in his book Never Again, a tome devoted to elaborating on the many alleged thought crimes directed against Jewry, he notes in a classic admission and denial manner:

“It’s even true that, proportionately, there has always been a relatively prominent Jewish presence in the movie, TV, and record industries, for a variety of social and cultural reasons.”
[1]

The fact is, and Foxman knows this better than anyone else, ethnic Jews have a virtual stranglehold on the media, in its many facets, which includes all of entertainment television and most importantly, the televised news media.

Foxman’s use of the words “prominent Jewish presence,” is an understatement, ethnic Jews are so over-represented in the media, that they constitute nothing less than a majority, which is indeed strange and disproportionate for a demographic that constitute less than 3% of the entire American population. Consider the following:

Writing of the initial merger of Time, Inc. with Warner, Jewish writer Michael Wolff said in New York magazine in 2001 “since Time Inc.'s merger with Warner ten years ago, one of the interesting transitions is that it has become a Jewish company.” [“From AOL to W,” New York magazine, January 29, 2001]

Disney, the world’s second largest media conglomerate was managed by Jewish CEO Michael Eisner for decades, Eisner made it his mission to corrupt anything and everything the founder of Disney, Walt Disney ever stood for. Disney was founded as a family entertainment program, but by the time Eisner left the company, Disney had produced programs of such filth and degeneracy that Disney can in no way be considered a network devoted to family entertainment. Eisner resigned a year ago and was replaced by another Jew, who has carried on Eisner’s depraved legacy.

The third largest media conglomerate is Viacom, and its headed by Sumner Redstone, a Jew born Murray Rothstein.

Edgar Bronfman Jr., another Jew, acquired NBC in a merger several years ago; he additionally monopolizes the recording industry, and owns Interscope records too, which is probably the largest producer of “Gangsta Rap,” in the world.

Fox Entertainment is headed by Rupert Murdoch, who is allegedly a Gentile, but I can tell you for certain, his background is obscured, this author spent a rather substantial sum of money three years ago in an attempt to trace Murdoch’s pedigree, and what I found was that his mother’s ancestry could not be verified one way or another. I was unable to prove Elisabeth Joy Greene was a Jew, but nor was I able to confirm that she wasn’t. According to Jewish Law, the child born of a Jewish womb is a Jew. In any case, Murdoch relies on a Jew named Peter Chernin to actually conduct the day-to-day business at Fox, so in essence, Jews have a prominent position at Fox too.

So there you have it, there are the facts. The three largest television media conglomerates are for all intents and purposes in the hands of ethnic Jews. Another well-known Jewish television entertainment personality named Ben Stein had this to say about the prevalence of Jews in the media industry:

At mighty Paramount, the controlling stockholder is Sumner Redstone. Head of the studio is Jon Dolgen. Head of production is Sherry Lansing--all members of the tribe. At titanic Disney, the CEO is Michael Eisner, the world's most assimilated Jew, who might as well be a Presbyterian. Deputy head is Michael Ovitz, karate champ but also a Jew. Head of the studio is Joe Roth. At newly energized ICM, the top dogs are Jeff Berg and Jim Wiatt. At still overwhelming CAA, Jack Rapke and other members of my faith predominate. At William Morris, Jon Burnham and other Jews are, by and large, in the power positions. This has always been true in Hollywood. The ex-furriers who created Hollywood were Eastern European Jewish immigrants, and all of the great edifice of fantasy-making in Hollywood is their handiwork. Names like Zukor and Lasky and Goldwyn and Cohn are the foundation of mass culture in America and the world.
[2]
Stein took it a step further by citing the fact that Hollywood, which as we now know is predominantly controlled by Jews, after all a Jew admitted it, has in fact had what is probably the greatest impact on western culture than any other factor in the last century. Foxman would deny it, but nonetheless it’s true, our perception of the world is largely the result of Hollywood’s impact on our culture, therefore, deductive logic demands that we recognize the fact that Jewry has had a considerable effect on how we view the world around us.

At this point it’s worth considering what Abraham Foxman has to say about anti-Semitism, he refers to it as a “virus,” a “disease,” a “plague,” a “hate crime,” but not once in his book Never Again does he even suggest that it might be a viable defense mechanism, a reaction to Jewish misbehavior, but that is in fact what it is. Edgar Steele a well-known Idaho attorney states that “anti-Semitism is a disease, you catch it from Jews.” Of course Steele isn’t well thought of by Foxman, in fact the ADL maintains a list of so called anti-Semites on its website and Steele is included on its illustrious list. Foxman also predictably foists the absolutely ridiculous idea that anti-Semitism is “fundamentally irrational,” on the reader. This is an old tactic that has been successfully utilized in the past, so why change something that works? The same folks that promote this idea, also embrace the idea that violence is always irrational, which sounds nice and gives one a warm fuzzy feeling inside, but it flies in the face of logic /rationality. The truth of the matter is, the decision to engage in violence in order to protect ones life, family, nation, may be the most rational decision one will ever have the chance to make in this life. One could easily argue that allowing oneself and/or one’s family members to be harmed or killed, without engaging in violence in order to stop it, is “fundamentally irrational.” However, this is not a distinction these people make, their doctrinaire approach is simple, “violence is always irrational.” I suggest that accepting this point of view is irrational, illogical and foolish. In this vein, there is nothing irrational about recognizing and speaking out about the very real influence Jews wield in this country, and the fact of the matter is, it would be extremely irrational not to do so, especially if one had concluded that said influence is in fact quite real. Likening scrutiny of a group’s collective behavior to a “disease,” reveals not “sound logic,” but an irrationality that knows no bounds.

Foxman’s entire thesis in Never Again centers around the idea that anti-Semitism is the “most resilient form of hatred known to humankind.”
[3] Foxman does his best to corner the market on victim hood for Jews, sure he pays other minorities lip service, but make no mistake about it, Foxman is first and foremost concerned with Jewry, he just exploits other minorities in an effort to extract the last remnant of sympathy remaining in the Gentile population, especially the white Gentile population.

I highly encourage readers to go to the library and check out Foxman’s book. Don’t buy it; that would only enrich this shyster. I absolutely guarantee that your library has it on its shelf; I can guarantee that with as much certainly as I can that you won’t find any books critical of Jewry or Zionism, or any books associated with non-kosher historical revisionism. By reading Foxman’s book with a critical eye, one unclouded by manufactured guilt and/or foolish sentiments, the reader will see what amounts to one gigantic and preposterous lie, from front to back, Foxman is nothing less that a modern day Ilya Ehrenburg.
[4]
The ADL is the organization most responsible for the emergence of modern “hate crime,” legislation, and its inequitable and nearly exclusive application against the white majority in the United States. As a rule, whites aren’t committing the greatest proportion of so called “hate crimes,” crimes committed against one group by another and motivated by bias and/or prejudice, blacks are. Most readers inherently know this, after all, few people with a firm grip on reality would argue today that the black community doesn’t harbor some hard feelings against white society, many people recognize this reality, most blacks and a few whites even sympathize with the black community for the inequity they have suffered from as a result of racism and prejudice. If one concurs with the preceding sentence, one can then accept the fact that blacks might engage in crimes that target whites as a result of this animosity. The fact of the matter is, according to our own Justice Department, blacks commit murder at a rate seven times that of whites.[5] Even this statistic is highly illusory, as Hispanics are included as White in the gathering and analysis of these crime statistics, thus giving the erroneous impression that white Europeans are committing more crimes than they in fact are. Despite this, blacks still clearly are committing more than fifty percent of the murders in this country – this is not a “racist,” statement or opinion, this is an empirical fact backed up by statistics gathered by the federal government.[6]

Foxman himself admits the ADL’s role in the development and implementation of unfair and highly biased “hate crimes,” legislation in the United States:

“Forty-two states and the District of Columbia currently have some form of hate crime law on the books that enables prosecutors to seek increased penalties when a victim is targeted in a bias crime. Most of these laws are based on model legislation originally drafted by ADL in 1981.”
[7]

The fact of the matter is organized Jewry, the ADL being one element of, is almost exclusively the primary advocate of such laws. Sure, many minorities also support the statutes believing they may benefit from them in some manner, but the fact of the matter is, Jews are the primary propelling force behind the laws as evidenced by Foxman’s above statement. The predominantly Jewish media itself focuses on crimes committed by whites; examples are numerous, all one need do is watch television. One recent and more importantly, titillating example, is the alleged rape of a black stripper by an entire Lacrosse team composed of upper class white students from Duke University. The entire case is a farce, it’s nothing more than a modern day example of the Tawana Brawley case of the 1980s in which a black teen was allegedly raped by several “racist,” whites that scrawled racial epithets on her body, including a swastika [Oh my] using human feces. That case was proven to be a hoax, and the same will prove true with the Duke Lacrosse rape. As a rule, white males just don’t rape black females, not in this day and age, it is extremely rare, almost unheard of, but that still hasn’t stopped the media from making a circus of the alleged incident.[8]

In the end, Abraham Foxman’s book should be carefully and unemotionally studied by those interested in Jewish influence, but to fully understand and appreciate the impact of Never Again, one must also investigate the history of Jewish influence in Europe and the United States. Foxman wrote Never Again with an agenda in mind, it isn’t new, it isn’t unique, it’s part and parcel of a tried and true strategy that has worked for Foxman and his predecessors, make the majority feel guilty for their support of persecution against minorities real and imagined, and then support the expected result, minority dissent and derision against the majority by convincing the minority that they are in fact victims of the majority. Machiavellism at its finest. In such an environment, what collective group can stand against Foxman’s real agenda, the advancement of the interests of organized Jewry, Zionism for the faint of heart.

Curt Maynard
 

________________________

 

Connecting The Dots - Zionists & 911

By Douglas Herman
Exclusive to Rense.com
7-7-6



"The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservatives, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history."
-Ari Shavit Ha'aretz News Service (Israel) April 5, 2003
 
 
Masterful Plan Or Masterful Crime?
 
Was it only a coincidence that so many rich and powerful Jewish Americans played a pivotal role, or performed a supporting role in the alleged "terrorist attack" on September 11, 2001 and the "War on Terror" that followed? Likewise, under closer scrutiny, why do we find so many Israelis, in the exact same locations as the alleged Islamic plotters and terrorists? Curious coincidence or clever design?
 
For nearly five years we have been permitted a piecemeal glimpse, partial views of 9-11, but without seeing the bigger picture. Is there a Big Picture, you ask? This essay will attempt to connect the dots, identify some of the curious players, individuals and groups who, quite often, seemed to serve a dual loyalty. The peculiar irony was the principle loyalty seemed to be to Israel.
 
Let us begin with what we know. Later we shall speculate. Still later we shall draw logical conclusions.
 
What does the masterful motto, "By Way of Deception Thou Shalt Do War," mean to the average American? Surprisingly, most Americans have never heard of the Mossad motto.
 
It means a war within a war, enclosed by a greater deceptive war. If you understand the clever goals and can comprehend the tactics, one then might begin to grasp the bigger picture. We might then begin to understand 9-11 and all that happened since and continues to happen.
 
The clues abound; the players still enjoy the spotlight; many have enriched themselves; others have been awarded honors, medals and lofty positions. Almost all those lofty positions and awards were awarded by other like themselves. Those awards and accolades were paid for with the blood, sweat, toil and tears of others.
 
By Way of Deception
 
Wealthy Zionist Larry Silverstein built World Trade Center Building 7 in 1985. The building was part of the WTC complex, owned by the New York Port Authority. WTC-7, ostensibly a US government building, housed offices of the Office of Emergency Management (OEM) Secret Service, CIA and Security & Exchange Commission (SEC). Late in the afternoon of September 11, 2001 Larry Silverstein, for all intents and purposes, had WTC-7 demolished.
 
Only months before, well-connected Zionist Lewis Eisenberg, Chairman of the New York Port Authority, which owned the WTC, leased the complex for 99 years to fellow Zionist Silverstein. How or why that transaction took place was never discussed. At the time, the WTC was considered, by many, as an architectural white elephant and less than desirable piece of real estate.
 
Meanwhile, well-connected Zionists had attained top positions of power throughout the Bush administration, and within the three branches of the US government. Many had signed a sort of Globalist Declaration of Independence. The document mirrored an earlier Israeli manifesto. The signers slowly consolidated power in America, unbeknownst to most Americans.
 
The PNAC-Project for The New American Century -- was first written by Zionists in Israel as an Israeli policy papers, "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm," before becoming an important blueprint for foreign policy here. Many of the same authors contributed to both papers. On the surface both papers seem pragmatic, almost admirable, filled with diplomatic language. Yet if we understand the motives and comprehend the methods-By Way of Deception -- we may discern the Big Picture.
 
 
Douglas Feith ascended to power at the Pentagon, as did fellow Zionists Paul Wolfowitz, Dov Zakheim and Richard Perle. Most, if not all, of these top military strategists curiously possessed dual passports: Israeli and US passports.
 
"He served Likud interests," said Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski of her superior, Douglas Feith, head of the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans (OSP). "I don't think those are the same as Israel's interests, but instead those of a faction within Israel.  He engineered Likud (Right wing Israeli party) outlined and desired actions by the US and, in Feith's mind, I think he did it for Israel.  I just don't have any countervailing information that would suggest he has ever done anything for America."
 
Likewise what role did Wolfowitz play? And Perle? And Zakheim? All Pentagon top officials. How does one hold a foreign passport — Israeli -- while holding Top Secret US security clearances? Does anyone see a conflict of interests here? One could argue these men were great patriots -- but for which country? Philosophically they all shared the same goal: Strengthen Israel; weaken the tyrannical Islamic states; hasten US hegemony of scarce resources for key global players and multinationals.
 
And they all worked at the Pentagon. If America was ever to be attacked -- perhaps by a team of Islamic fanatics -- what better symbolic target than the Pentagon? Curiously, only a year before, the Pentagon had war-gamed just such an attack. You would have thought someone would have been prepared.
 
The Underlings
 
The alleged Israeli art students in Hollywood, Florida (They sold cheap Chinese art) lived on the EXACT same street, only blocks from the alleged Islamic hijackers (who flunked flight school). What were the odds of that happening?
Was there a shared connection, a common link, a series of dots perhaps (strip clubs)? Or was it simply a massive coincidence that a team of possible Mossad double agents posing as art students, lived blocks away from alleged Islamic fanatics who just happened to train next to US military bases?
 
What about those dancing Israeli furniture movers in Liberty State Park? They filmed the event from atop their white van, while celebrating the successful attack. Later, two other vans were stopped in key access points to Manhattan. The FBI kept these Israelis for weeks before eventually releasing them. In the horrific days following 9-11, other vans were stopped. Other Israelis were arrested. Dogs detected traces of explosives in the vans. If not for the vigilance of local law enforcement officers in several states (unlike the FBI), how many other targets in America would have been destroyed?
 
The US media actually performed quite well for 24 hours following the attack. Unbelievably, even Fox News.
 
"What is striking about Fox News Reporter Carl Cameron's portrait of Israel's spy network in the U.S. is the sheer vastness of his subject," wrote Justin Raimondo, in The Terror Enigma: Israel and the September 11 Connection, "In the months leading up to 9/11, Cameron claimed Israel was waging a covert war against its principal ally and benefactor, the United States."
 
But aside from smaller newspaper, like the Bergen Record, few reports of these obvious false flag-black operations by Israeli double agents appeared anywhere on cable news giants CNN, MSNBC or Fox in subsequent weeks. Nor did the appear in the mainstream newspapers. Why didn't they?
 
A quick glance at the masthead of any daily New York newspaper reveals a preponderance of Jewish editors and publishers. What was most revealing, after 9-11, was not so much editorial reluctance but an overwhelming self-censorship, a stony silence, by all the New York City newspapers. They refused to mention — EVER -- the probable connection of Israel to the 9-11 attack. Even though seven prominent NYC steel scrapers were demolished under exceedingly suspicious circumstances, not ONE Judeo-centric newspaper launched even a semblance of an investigation. Given the fact that Israel possessed the greater motive, means and opportunity to carry out the 9-11 attack, one had to wonder about the criminal complicity of the big New York dailies.
 
Other NYC periodicals went out of their way to debunk any attempt to get at the truth. Periodicals like Popular Mechanics, edited by a cousin of US Homeland Security head, Michael Chertoff, mouthed the official (Zionist) version of events. According to every New York periodical, Islamic terrorists hijacked the planes. How they attained the means, not to mention the opportunity to attack, was rarely broached.
 
 
Compromise security and you can conquer a city, state or nation. The Trojan Horse being a good example; America being another.
 
If indeed hijackers somehow got past airport security cameras and avoided normal flight check in procedures, wouldn't the suspicion fall on the Israeli-owned security company at Logan airport in Boston? How would hijackers have access to gates and terminals otherwise? No Mainstream news reports indicated hijackers got past airline employees working flight check-in counters. Somehow this remains a minor detail to the US media.
 
Even more suspicious, regarding security, how exactly did Islamic terrorists manage to gain access to the interior structure of WTC-7, in order to place obvious demolition charges? Wealthy real estate mogul and Zionist Larry Silverstein, the new lessee of the entire WTC complex, would have had final say in any security, wouldn't he? Additionally, the WTC-7 was, for all intents and purposes, a US government building. How could an enormous building, housing offices of the CIA, Secret Service and the SEC be left unsecured---unless the new landlord chose the "security" outfit.
 
Even more strange, flaming debris somehow scattered across a city block from the collapsing Twin Towers and set afire the 11th floor of WTC-7, where the SEC was located. Why this floor? What was located there?
 
"Odds are the SEC records in WTC 7 that were fortuitously destroyed when that building was 'pulled' included this bogus Brady Bond deal," wrote Karl Schwarz.
"Our sources have informed us that there was a group of ONI [Office of Naval Intelligence] working in this part of the Pentagon (that was destroyed) that were investigating the $120 billion Brady Bond scam I have reported on recently."

A masterful crime or a diabolical yet masterful spy operation? Probably both.

Instead of a terrorist attack, the crime begins to look like a huge scam with billions in profits and thousands dead.
 
If one were to examine this enormous evil iceberg further, and not just the tip, one might discover a monumental mass of icy Intelligence-connected players below the surface. Very likely, the entire WTC operation was a combination insurance scam (Benefiting one wealthy Zionist), false flag "terrorist" op (benefiting one Zionist nation), and billion dollar gold heist (Benefiting various operatives from many branches of intelligence possibly). Difficult to believe the CIA and Secret Service -- not to mention Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management -- had NO prior knowledge of the impending destruction of their offices.
 
According to the London Times: "The Comex metals trading division of the New York Mercantile Exchange kept 3,800 gold bars - weighing 12 tonnes and worth more than $100 million (£70 million) - in vaults in the building's basement. Comex also held almost 800,000 ounces of gold there on behalf of others, with a value of about $220 million (worth more than $560,000,000 today). It also held more than 102 million ounces of silver, worth $430 million (Worth $1.5 billion today). The Bank of Nova Scotia, which kept gold in the Comex vault, reported $200 million of gold lost in the wreckage (Lost-!). Comex also held precious metals for Chase Manhattan Bank, the Bank of New York and Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking." 
 
Not surprisingly, one massive gold-filled truck was discovered, crushed, in the tunnels below the WTC complex. Perhaps, in the eight hours, between 9 AM and 5 PM, when WTC-7 was demolished and Americans were glued to televisions, horrified, masterful planners heisted hundreds of millions in gold bullion. Before Silverstein finally "pulled" the US government building, that is.
 
Which leaves us only THREE final questions: Who leased the building only months before? Who hired security at Logan and the WTC? Who covered up the subsequent crime in the US media, not only in New York City but the nation? 
 
Still not convinced that key, dual-citizenship "Zionists" played a pivotal part? Perhaps THE pivotal part? The final footnote, indicating overwhelming involvement in the 9-11 attack, and the subsequent power to cover up any involvement, occurred 18 months later. That signature event was the War with Iraq, launched with whole-hearted White House, US Media and Congressional support on March 18, 2003. 
 
On Purim, a significant Jewish holiday, a day signifying destruction of Israel's enemies.

Masterful.
 
USAF veteran, Amateur historian and student of Spinoza and Thoreau, Douglas Herman questions authority.  Shouldn't you?

 

_________________________________

Brisbane, Australia

28 June 2006

Dr Töben

Ich möchte Ihnen mitteilen, auf was ich schon lange warte, und was mich sehr interessiert. Es sind die Terroristenakte der "Amerikaner" ... Panama Kanal, Columbia, Mexico, Zentralamewrica, besonders Guzman Arbenz in Guatemala, Panama, Count Bernadotte, Lumumba im Kongo, Tschombe, Katanga, die Heldenakte der CIA, Philippinen, Baralong & Nicosian schoss auf schiffbrüchige deutsche Seeleute, Altmark, Lansing; wie W.W.I manipuliert Lusitania, Britische Lords Carson, Spring Rice, John Foster Dulles verwandschaft mit Lansing, Brandeis mit Wilson & Colonel House, CFR, Sanhedrin, Zar Nicolaus' Verweigerung Asylum in England, Bank of England, Marconi Skandal, Julius & Ethel Rosenberg, Attentat auf Lincoln Rockwell, Helmut Stern 1944-47, Grenada, Chile's General Schneider Attentat, El Salvador Bischof Romero, Dominican Republic Massaker 1965, Kuba 1898, Korfanti in Schlesien 1918, Franzosiche Revolution 1789, Danton Marat Robespiere, President Wilson & Brandeis, Lloyd Geroge & Sasson, Orlando, Clemenceau & Mandel Rothschild, Egypten's Suez Kanal, Sir Alan Brooke 1944-45, Rhodes Scholarship, London School of Economics Plan, Cromwell 1650, Bernard Shaw, Alexandria & Arabi Pasha, Ashanti, Mahdi, Mutesi, Basuto, Chaka, Sanghay & Hausa, Oranien-Transvaal, 18B, Panama Skandal...

Mir schmerzt schon die Hand - Grüsse -  Max Gistinger, 41 Willmington St, Newmarket 4051, Australia.

 

 

Top | Home

©-free 2006 Adelaide Institute