|
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Dr. Charles E Weber, former professor of European Languages at the University of Tulsa, Oklahoma, passed away on Christmas Day 2002. A long time Revisionist, Dr Weber was also on the editorial advisory committee of The Journal of Historical Review.
Dear Reader
To date Revisionists have spent a lot of money defending free speech: We
must be guaranteed the right to be wrong, and any robust democracy defends
this right to be wrong. This is what the marketplace of ideas is all about.
Revisionists are persecuted through legal prosecution. Interestingly, it is
permitted to doubt whether the moon landings happened, but in many countries
it is illegal to doubt whether the 'Holocaust' happened.
Why?
In the past, many supporters have given generously to causes before the
courts, then found that their donations certainly brought a case into court,
but the matter was either lost or decided inconclusively. In most cases
individual careers were destroyed in the process. In rare instances, such as
Ernst Zündel at Toronto, a law was actually struck off the books.
We are hoping that the challenge we are throwing out to Australia's
Zionist-Jewish Community will transcend the normal factional in-fighting in
all spheres of social/political endeavour.
Our fight is far more fundamental than that, and it transcends any quarrel we
may have with the Zionists. They, themselves, are faced with the unspeakable
horrors that they have unleashed against the Palestinian people.
We are fighting to safeguard our humanity from an attack that attempts to
reduce our minds to slavery, as prevailed in the former Soviet Union
countries where every life's whim had to be seen through
atheistic-Marxist-materialistic eyes.
Parts of that 70+ years Soviet Union horror story is now told by Alexander Solzhenitsyn
in his latest volume '200 Years Together, a historical study of the
relationship between Russians and Jews in Russia'.
Such a horror story must never happen again - never again! Yet, our court
case is preparing the legal climate for such an event.
It is in the interest of many individuals and groups to proclaim the
'Holocaust' dogma as a new world religion, and we must resist this with all
our strength.
Not only money will help in this enterprise, but also moral support.
The issue now before the Australian court is not whether the 'Holocaust'
happened or whether Jews/Zionists can use it to hide behind and deflect
legitimate criticism of their behaviour, especially their oppressive
behaviour towards the Palestinians.
Whether you believe in the 'Holocaust' or not is now irrelevant because
there is a much larger issue at stake.During my 1999 German imprisonment I penned the following: If you deny me my freedom to think and to speak, then you deny me my humanity, and you commit a crime against humanity. Truth is my defence.
The issue now is FREE SPEECH, and a ruling, albeit from a tribunal, in South
Africa has opened a possible avenue from which there is hope of finding
relief from legal oppression.
After Cape Town's Radio 786 won in the Constitutional Court, South Africa's
Jewish Community took the Moslem community radio station back to the
Broadcasting Complaints Commission, as it had done previously, but lost its
case in November 2002.
In dismissing the complaint, Commissioner Roland Sutherland wrote that "the
trivializing of the extent of the suffering [of Jews during World War II is]
doubtless perceived by many who accept the accuracy of Holocaust evidence as
churlish and insulting. Nevertheless, in my view, it is not the stuff of
which reasonable people take offence to the degree it warrants the
proscription of the expression of such views ... no attack in the broadcast
on the Jewish religion or Jews as such ... no exhortation to hatred of any
particular religious group or group of individuals."
(Read the full text of the Judgment at: www.MoslemRadio786 )
The above decision may be significant because our case is a test case. If we
lose, then Australia's legal system will lose its Common Law tradition, and
our already limited freedom of speech will cease to exist.
Do you feel strongly enough to back this fight and put your money where your
mouth is?
Our battle is a global battle against those who thrive on enslaving the
minds. Are we going to let this happen? If we did, we would be mad.Fredrick Töben
*Simulated terrorism attack to take place in Sydney*
ABC News 19 December 2002
There will be a major counter-terrorism exercise in Sydney today to test
authorities' preparedness to respond to a real-life attack. But the details about the incident, its exact location and timing have been kept secret.
New South Wales Premier Bob Carr and Police Commissioner Ken Moroney announced two days ago that a simulated terrorist attack would take place in Sydney today.
But little information has since been revealed about the exercise, with both men saying the nature, exact location and timing of the incident has been kept secret from them.
Led by Chief Superintendent Norm Hazzard, the exercise will be staged in the Sydney suburbs of Alexandria and Parramatta. It is believed it will run for four hours this morning and will involve up to 70 police.
Authorities say the mock attack is necessary to test government and police readiness to combat terrorism.
Mr Carr says while he knows nothing about the plan, it is of great value
to the state's sense of security. "It is a message of reassurance that in at every level we are testing
our preparedness, and I think that should be reassuring to people," he said.
*Iraq war closer as dossier rejected*
ABC News
Friday December 20, 2002
The threat of war on Iraq is one step closer with the United States and
Britain rejecting its 12,000-page weapons declaration.
The American and British response came after the United Nations' chief
weapons inspectors, Dr Hans Blix and Mohamed el Baradei, provided their
initial assessment of Iraq's declaration to a closed meeting of the UN
Security Council.
Dr Blix told the Security Council Iraq had failed to provide the
evidence that it no longer possesses weapons of mass destruction.
"An opportunity was missed in the declaration to give a lot evidence,"
he said.
The US Secretary of State Colin Powell, says Iraq is in material breach
of the resolution.
"This declaration totally fails to meet the resolution's requirements,"
he said.
Mr Powell called for the inspections to continue and to give high
priority to questioning Iraqi scientists outside of the country.
"Iraq is obligated to make such witnesses available," he said.
Resolution 1441 calls for serious consequences if the Security Council
finds that Iraq has failed to comply.
Before United Nations weapons inspectors had even delivered their
assessment, Iraq was already rejecting the allegations it had failed to
declare all of its weapons of mass destruction.
Iraqi presidential adviser Amer Al Saadi says there is nothing new in
the declaration, because there is nothing new to report.
He says weapons inspectors have already received all the information
they need.
"We are not worried," he said. "It is the other party that is worried
because there is nothing they can pin on us."
Iraq says the US and Britain have no evidence to support their
allegations that Iraq is hiding weapons of mass destruction.
Think on these Things
There is nothing new in the return of inspectors of so-called weapons of mass destruction in Iraq An attempt to subjugate a defeated state and population 'forever' was made with the Versailles Treaty in 1920 against Germany and its World War One allies.
To enforce the 'de-militarisation' an Inter-Allied Military Control Commission was formed, which had the power to go anywhere, anytime in Germany to find concealed and illegal weapons. The Commission, formed out of intentionally-chosen technical experts and German-haters, soon became notorious for its chicaneries, which extended not unexpectedly into centres of industrial espionage, economical sabotage, especially in areas where the victors feared German competition. The German chemical industry was therefore its favorite target.
In spite of extensive use of bribery and treason in finding forbidden weapons it was an almost total failure. Yet the commission continued to hang around Germany until 1927 when it was reluctantly disbanded.
General von Seekt, chief of the Reichswehr — the German army of that time — had personally ordered and insisted on adhering to the limitations imposed upon Germany by the treaty. That patriotic officers of lower rank did not always comply was a different matter. But in principle this mattered little, for Germany was effectively disarmed, much weaker than the smallest of its aggressive neighbours, for example, Czechoslovakia. Remember, that even that 'shitty little state' of Lithuania was able to annex part of East Prussia in 1923.
This reminds us of what is now happening in Iraq.
Suring the 1920s French politicians unashamedly and without proof pulled the 'secret German armaments and hidden armies' card and, for their own vindictive ends, made unending demands for 'reparations' with which to blackmail the feeble Weimar republic.
It is worth to remember that the previous search for 'weapons of mass destruction' in Iraq was a failure, and when Iraq kicked out the inspectors, it was not because of their useless search, but for espionage condoned by that infamous Australian 'diplomat' Richard Butler.
The de-militarisation Commissions for the other loser states of World War One were just as ineffective as in Germany. Austria and Hungary were bankrupt; in Bulgaria the army saw to it that the investigators were utterly frustrated and thereby accomplishing nothing, while in Turkey they never managed to start at all because Turkey refused to ratify the Treaty of Sevres.
http://www.arabia.com/pina/article/english/0,14183,351982,00.html
Playing Toss, Israelis Force Palestinians to Choose Torture Method
Arabia.com | December 17, 2002, 10:58 PM
"Israeli torture methods vary from breaking a right hand, a left hand, a
head, a hand and a leg, both legs, a tooth, a nose or simply a shot with a
bullet .."
By Awad el-Rajub
HEBRON - Among various torture schemes adopted by Israeli occupation forces
against Palestinians is a so-called "toss" game whereby they force
Palestinians to choose their own type of torture.
Speaking to IslamOnline Tuesday, December 17, Youssef, a 22-year-old
Palestinian, recalled that he was on his way back home to Al-Khalil
(Hebron) when he ran into four Israeli soldiers.
"They held me at gun-point, ordered me to take off my shirt and searched me
to the nose," he recalled.
"They dragged me ten meters away and told me I have to choose my own
torture through a toss by picking a paper out of eight pieces of paper put
in a
small pot," said Youssef.
"I chose one of the eight papers and it had a "hand breaking" phrase. One
of them [Israeli soldiers] grabbed me while the three others broke my right
hand with the rear of their rifles. They then beat me up until I was
unconscious and I was taken to hospital.
"I later learned from other boys how they too were forced to choose one of
the torture methods which varied from breaking a right hand, a left hand, a
head, a hand and a leg, both legs, a tooth, a nose or simply a shot with a
bullet," he asserted.
Omar, a 30-year-old Palestinian taxi driver, said he was driving with seven
passengers when four Israeli soldiers stopped him on the way, ordered them
out and searched the car.
"Although they did not find anything, they took me to a pot which had four
pieces of paper with writing varying from breaking car glass, to blowing
the
tires, to taking the car keys to confiscating the vehicle altogether," he
recalled.
"I chose the easiest of the four tough choices and they broke the car glass
and then let me go," he asserted.
On other torture methods the Israeli forces use against Palestinian
civilians, Mohammad said he witnessed Israeli soldiers torturing
Palestinians near the
new barbed wires in downtown Al-Khalil.
"I saw them removing the teeth of Palestinian youths and hitting one child
with the rear of their rifles," said Mohammad, asserting that the
Palestinians were taken to hospital.
Rami, a 27-year-old Palestinian who was also a victim of Israeli torture,
recalls: "I was going to wok in Al-Khalil industrial zone and on the road
Israeli
patrol soldiers stopped me and beat me until I couldnt stand on my feet.
"After that four soldiers stripped me and threw me into cold water of
industrial waste.
"They finally ordered me to run home without allowing me to put my clothes
on," Rami conculded.
The Palestinian Human Rights Society condemned these Israeli barbaric
aggressions, branding them as "stark violation of the simplest human
rights."
Speaking to IslamOnline, Fahmi Shahein of Al-Khalil Law Society stressed
they received several complains about Israeli tortures.
The society will contact Arab and foreign human rights watch-dogs to update
them on the Israeli violations and racist assaults, he said.
"The Israeli aggression is part of maltreatment and disrespect of human
dignity that contradicts all international conventions and laws," Shahein
stressed.
He blamed the world community for such Israeli crimes, asserting that
international silence directly encourages the Israeli occupation to pursue
its waged war on the armless Palestinian people and perpetrate more crimes.
-IslamOnline (islamonline.net). Redistributed via Press International
News Agency (PINA).
"Today the world faces a single man armed with weapons of mass destruction,
manifesting an aggressive, bullying attitude, who may well plunge the world
into chaos and bloodshed if he miscalculates. This person, belligerent,
arrogant and sure of himself, truly is the most dangerous person on Earth.
The problem is that his name is George W. Bush, and he is our president."
Jack M. Balkin, Knight Professor of Constitutional Law and the First
Amendment at Yale Law School, September 22, 2002
If the State of Israel continues to exist, then racism remains a legitimate form of political activity.
If Israel expels the Palestinians, then this will be the greatest Holocaust of all times perpetrated by the Jewish people.
*Simulated terrorism attack to take place in Sydney*
ABC News 19 December 2002
There will be a major counter-terrorism exercise in Sydney today to test
authorities' preparedness to respond to a real-life attack. But the details about the incident, its exact location and timing have been kept secret.
New South Wales Premier Bob Carr and Police Commissioner Ken Moroney announced two days ago that a simulated terrorist attack would take place in Sydney today.
But little information has since been revealed about the exercise, with both men saying the nature, exact location and timing of the incident has been kept secret from them.
Led by Chief Superintendent Norm Hazzard, the exercise will be staged in the Sydney suburbs of Alexandria and Parramatta. It is believed it will run for four hours this morning and will involve up to 70 police.
Authorities say the mock attack is necessary to test government and police readiness to combat terrorism.
Mr Carr says while he knows nothing about the plan, it is of great value
to the state's sense of security. "It is a message of reassurance that in at every level we are testing
our preparedness, and I think that should be reassuring to people," he said.
Comment: 19 December 200
NEWS DESK MICHAEL WALSH - 13th March 2001 JEWISH RACE WAR CLAIMED
20 MILLION GERMAN LIVESWORLDWIDE EXCLUSIVE BASED ON RECORDS RECENTLY RELEASED.
Secret documents recently released by the British Records Office at Kew in London reveal the stark horror of ritual executions of German POWS carried out by British, American and Jewish torturers, assisted incredibly by certified doctors. Here is a story that will shock the world.
GERMANY HONOURED THEIR FOES The stark contrast between the Axis and Allied treatment of prisoners of war is only now being revealed. Typically, in September 1939 after the speedy success of the German-Polish campaign, captured Polish generals and officers, as well as those of other ranks, were treated according to convention and even chivalrously. There are no records of their being abused or maltreated by their German captors.Acclaimed historians such as A.J.P Taylor, as far as permitted, resisted political interference in the accurate recording of events. The late professor conceded that the German attack on Poland was in response to British-backed Polish aggression to which Czechoslovakia was already a victim. Since the Polish occupation of Czechoslovakia Germany too suffered repeated Polish attacks on its borders and the occupation of its territory.
Matters were finally brought to a head by Polish Foreign Minister Beck’s inflexibility over the Danzig question as well as daily revelations of murderous atrocities committed against German nationals in Polish occupied territories.
HITLER PAYS HIS RESPECTS Having secured German borders Adolf Hitler paid a personal visit to the tomb of Marshall Pilsudski, the renowned Polish President. Bareheaded and with military cap in hand he paid silent respect for several minutes. In 1940 after the fall of France the German leader made a similar chivalrous gesture when visiting the tomb of his predecessor Napoleon Bonaparte.During the occupation members of the former French government were left in peace and were never molested by the German authorities. An honourable peace agreement had been signed with the lawful government of France at the beautiful spa town of Vichy.
Throughout occupied France life went on as normal. William L. Shirer the Jewish journalist and author of The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, though notorious for putting a Jewish spin on the Third Reich, accepted that "The Parisians actually believed the Germans would rape the women and do worse to the men ... the ones who stayed are all the more amazed at the very correct behavior of the troops."
German soldiers undeniably behaved in a correct and courteous manner towards the French populace. Any violations of this code were severely punished by court martial. As a remarkable further gesture of reconciliation Adolf Hitler ordered that the remains of Napoleon’s son, the ill-fated Napoleon 11, be removed from its burial chamber in Vienna and re-interred at Les Invalides in Paris. It is difficult to imagine a more conciliatory and generous act of placation being placed before the French people.
BRITISH FAKE VICTORY PHOTOGRAPHS Professor David Dilks giving a lecture at Leeds University disclosed "that the British version of the famous film in which Hitler skips for joy at the defeat of France was doctored by us (the British) for propaganda purposes". He also revealed that "Hitler’s tread that day was in fact remarkably sober." - Sunday Telegraph, 26.3.72.Those attending this lecture, ‘Chamberlain, Churchill and the Fall of France’ included Lord Boyle, former Financial Secretary to the Treasury and Mrs. Stephen Lloyd, daughter of former Prime Minister Chamberlain.
Good relations continued until the Soviet Union’s entry in to the war 1941. It was then that the French Communist Party, in cohort with the French runaway renegade, General deGaulle who with Winston Churchill took the war to the German occupiers by planning acts of terrorism; sabotage, assassination and murder.
Members of Britain’s special forces were parachuted in or dropped off along France’s extensive coastline. Once ashore atrocities were committed against German troops and their civilian administrators, and then evidence was left to suggest local rebellious guilt. The purpose was to goad the Germans into reprisals that would then ignite the inconveniently complacent population. The Germans assisted by the French authorities, did resort to vigorous counter measures.
VIOLETTE SZABO WAS NEVER TORTURED - OFFICIAL One such agent was the Anglo-French woman, Violette Szabo. Recruited as an agent she made several drops into occupied France and with others brought about considerable destruction and loss of life. Twice she was captured and twice she escaped. On a third occasion, holed up with others, she killed several German soldiers before being captured. She was shot – according to convention – in the winter of 1944-1945.Szabo was never tortured as has been alleged. Claims that the Gestapo routinely tortured captives are so wide of the mark that incidences of maltreatment had to be made-up. The most infamous of these frauds related to the captured Violette Szabo which were later repeated in the film (Carve Her Name With Pride), books and of course various websites.
Her fellow prisoners, Captain Peuleve and Wing Commander Yeo-Thomas G.C., both of whom were interrogated and imprisoned with Szabo stated unequivocally that Szabo was never maltreated by the Germans.
"The torture claims made by her researcher Mr. Minney caused Captain Peuleve much embarrassment. He had wrongly and without his knowledge been named as the sole source of evidence for the torture allegations in the posthumous George Cross citation awarded to Szabo." - Sunday Times 4th April 1965.
THE WORLD’S FIRST FULL SCALE RACE WAR
US Commander-in-Chief Ge-neral Dwight D. Eisenhower who took personal responsi-bility for ensuring the des-truction of the German people was also of Jewish descent.
Through the early period of the war an unspoken understanding and shared chivalry existed between the British and German air forces - until May 1940. Then Winston Churchill, by cajolery and trickery succeeded in ousting influential government ministers who regarded him as a warmonger and favored honorable peace negotiations with Germany. Consequently British attitudes rapidly deteriorated as the ‘phony war’ rapidly turned into the total war for which Churchill had long plotted. America’s President Roosevelt had by this time assured him of the material support of the United States.
From this point on the military war against Germany turned into the world’s first war of racial genocide; a war that had one purpose; to totally destroy Germany as a nation and to decimate beyond recovery the German people. Their nation had been handed a death sentence and the consequences would cost millions of lives.
It was a war in which prisoners of the allies would be taken only reluctantly. Those captured would be slaughtered; others enslaved, deported, worked to death or subjected to mortal deprivation. Simultaneously the allies prepared for an unprecedented air war that would incinerate Germany’s civilian population in their homes.
Virtually all Germany’s adversaries were of non-European stock. Roosevelt was of Dutch-Jewish ancestry and surrounded himself with America’s most powerful Jewish figures, many of them prominent in the underworld.
Winston Churchill though not Jewish was the offspring of an American ‘society family’ and was proud of his Iroquois Red Indian blood. He detested and feared Europe and felt belittled by its culture. He is also on record as saying: "I am a Zionist." One of his first acts on seizing power (Churchill was unelected) was to halt all intelligence gathering on Soviet suspects, which led to the wholesale infiltration of MI5 and MI6.
US Commander-in-Chief General Dwight D. Eisenhower who took personal responsibility for ensuring the destruction of the German people was also of Jewish descent. The eminent anthropologist Arnold Leece described as ‘sheer nauseating nonsense’ his message of goodwill to the sinister Jewish lobby group B’nai B’rith.
"Our primary purpose," Eisenhower later told war journalist J. Kingsley Smith "Is the destruction of as many Germans as possible. I expect to destroy every German west of the Rhine and within that area in which we are attacking." - General Eisenhower. J. Kingsley Smith (INS) Paris. February, 24th, 1945.
BLOOD-SOAKED DICTATORS On the eve of the Jewish New Year Eisenhower issued this message: "Rosh Hashana, the Jewish New Year, is significant to every American, in the deepest spiritual sense, we are all the seed of Abraham and Issac."The Soviet dictator, the blood-soaked Georgian Joseph Stalin, whose racial origins are far from European, also surrounded himself by Jews, which included his father-in-law. Yiddish was the language used habitually by his family.
Against this formidable international array holding stupendous world power stood a revitalized Christian and financially independent Germany with its European Axis partners.
Roosevelt at this time was about to plunge the unwilling and deceived American people into war with Japan and soon afterwards Germany. Despite America’s so-called neutrality its warships had already been given the nod to sink German shipping and betray German shipping movements to Britain’s armed forces.
Britain in the meanwhile, again in defiance of international law, had initiated the cold-blooded deliberate bombing of civilian targets. This understandably provoked retaliatory German raids on Britain’s cities. The ruse gave the British warlord two advantages. It weakened Germany’s defensive capabilities (Russia was mobilizing to attack Germany) and it brought about a total war psychosis in the beleaguered English populations. It ended reluctance for his war against Hitler’s Germany. The ultimate fate of Britain and Europe, indeed the world was about to be sealed.
As the war neared its conclusion in 1944 and Germany and its Axis partners fought against overwhelming odds, the principle instigators of the near destruction of western civilization relished their moment. Winston Churchill, often drunk, attended conferences at Tehran and Yalta to conspire in the dismemberment and looting of central Europe and the removal of Germany as a trade competitor.
Attending the conferences were the world’s most evil men including Josef Stalin and of course Roosevelt and his henchmen. Between these malevolent conspirators representing the Capitalist and Communist facade of world Jewry, all of prostrated Europe lay at their mercy. There was to be no mercy and no compassion.
NO MERCY FOR EUROPE Never in the history of mankind have the northern hemisphere’s multi-national populations had their fate decided by so few. Tragically among those manic few were men who already held humanity’s chilling record for race genocide - and the worst was yet to come.In 1943 at the Tehran Conference Stalin with cold-blooded effrontery, among other diabolical schemes, proposed that following the Allied victory 50,000 German officers were to be randomly selected and shot.
The Soviet dictator had already executed virtually all of his own Red Army general staff in 1937 so the casual liquidation of tens of thousands of German officers posed no particular problem for him.
Winston Churchill balked at the proposal but not because he was opposed to the scale of the unfolding atrocities. He had already covered up the Soviet Union’s wholesale slaughter of 14,500 Polish Army officers at Katyn and elsewhere. He had by then turned a blind eye to the deportation and partial liquidation of 1.7 million Poles under Soviet jurisdiction. Nor was his reluctance due to the fact that the proposed atrocity was a gross violation of international law. He demurred simply because even the British people, despite years of poisonous anti-German propaganda, would be repelled at being dragooned into assisting the Soviet Union’s genocidal killing machine.
US Admiral Daniel Leahy was angry: "I felt sorry for the German people. We were planning - and we had the force to carry out our plans - to obliterate a one mighty nation."
MASS KILLINGS WITHOUT TRIAL Churchill favored instead the immediate mass shooting, without trial, of the 100 most influential leaders of the German nation. Sham trials would be arranged for the rest so that Stalin would get what he wanted and the British warlord would keep his bogus respectability.The European-wide killing machines were already being set up. These included military tribunals and mock judicial trials later to be damned as kangaroo courts by thousands of jurists, ecclesiastics, military leaders, politicians, diplomats and writers throughout the world
These courts were given a judicial veneer to add spurious legitimacy to the wholesale slaughter of the defeated nation’s military personnel. The outcome was that Stalin got his 50,000 corpses – and more, whilst Winston Churchill was able to distance himself from implication in Soviet-style mass murder without trial.
TENS OF THOUSAND POWS MURDERED The number of captive German soldiers, National Socialist and civilian functionaries summarily killed or tortured to death from the war’s end and through the 1950s runs into tens of thousands. One of the biggest mass slaughter machines ever created was cranked up to liquidate 20% of the people of the defeated German nation, but there was capacity and desire to increase this dreadful quota.Henry Morgenthau US Secretary of the Treasury and Robert Vansittart, the US London-based Diplomatic Advisor in 1940 along with other prominent Jews demanded the genocide of the German people. Theodore Nathan Kaufman, another of America’s most influential Jews also insisted on the end of the German peoples existence. He demanded the forced sterilization of all people of German stock and demanded that the German nation be divided between the conquerors. He calculated a period of two generations to achieve this aim.
Much of these plans were in fact carried out. Germany’s population was decimated and one third of its historical lands are even now occupied by satellite states.
The Soviet Union within months of the war’s end kidnapped an estimated 5,000,000 people. Mostly but not exclusively they were members of the German armed forces. Their destination, the notorious Gulag Archipelago chain of slave camps through the Siberian hinterland. Few survived.
GERMANY PERISHES The United States, France and Britain were directly and indirectly responsible for deaths far exceeding these dreadful figures. The official figure of 3.5 million German dead is completely bogus. Even Churchill who was unlikely to exaggerate such figures stated: "I am not alarmed by the reduction of the population. Six million Germans have lost their lives in the war. We can expect that by the end of the war many more will be killed, and then there will be room for those expelled" (ethnically cleansed from their original homelands) – Voice of History 1944-1945. Speeches and Papers of Roosevelt, Churchill, Stalin, Chiang, Hitler and Other Leaders, p 615.To Churchill’s figures can be added an estimated 13,000,000 – 15,000,000 German people who were liquidated by various means - after the war’s end. Approximately 20 million central Europeans, members of one of the most gifted Christian nations on earth had lost their lives by the early 1950s. All had perished at the hands of the victor nations who almost to a man took their instruction from those who were neither European by race nor Christian by faith.
(British dead including civilians is placed at 264,000. For every Briton who died 80 Germans died).
With tens of millions of displaced people wandering aimlessly across central Europe it was left to the ravages of nature, principally typhoid, starvation and a destroyed infrastructure to 'cull' the surviving German population. All means of survival were blocked at the defeated country’s borders to assist nature in 'taking its course'. Corpses littered the highways and byways, towns and cities of the German nation. What Stalin had brought to the Ukraine he brought to central Europe, with the assistance of Churchill and Roosevelt.
GUARDS AMUSE THEMSELVES BY SHOOTING PRISONERS In the vast holding camps of General Eisenhower it is estimated that 740,000 German POWS died from malnutrition, disease and maltreatment. This included casual murder on a horrifying scale. One ex-guard described how some of the other guards would amuse themselves by placing food outside the camp parameters, and then shoot dead those POWS who were sufficiently foolhardy to take their chances.Five million members of Germany’s armed forces had already been spirited away to the slave camps of the USSR. Millions more fetched up in camps across Europe, America and Canada. The French post war army took charge of nearly one million prisoners from the Americans for use as slave labour euphemistically called ‘reparations’. Even Rome at its most decadent had stopped short of carnage and slavery on such a monstrous scale. Of these postwar prisoners such were the conditions they were held in that 250,000 of them died in the most distressing of circumstances. Britain laid claim to 460,000 German slaves who were kept until 1948 when the International Red Cross insisted upon their release.
Most were soldiers of the Wehrmacht who had laid down their arms in May 1945 but scores of thousands were civilians including women, elderly people; even children. Most of these appalling deaths were listed as 'other losses' or 'Perdu Pour Paisons Diverses'. James Bacque in his book, 'Other Losses' has established the truth about these and other atrocities beyond all doubt.
THE FIRST GENOCIDAL RACE WAR WAS JEWISH The first war in which race was the killing factor rather than by unfortunate circumstance, as with the Native American and Australian aboriginal populations, was Jewish. Its victims white European and Christian.The evidence suggests that the killing frenzy of America’s Jews was motivated by the desire to kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people, not for any crime they had committed, but simply on the grounds that they were of different race to themselves.
In Washington DC as the Second World War came to its bitter end with the ‘unconditional surrender’ of Germany imminent, a bitter policy dispute arose between Henry Morgenthau and the then Secretary of State Henry Stinson.
Morgenthau by this time proposed the execution (without trial) of all members of the German National Socialist Party. Such was the Jewish desire for the spilling of German blood. Only when he learned that there were 15,000,000 NSDAP cardholding Germans was he forced to modify his demands. Stinson held his ground in favour of legally processing individual Germans – which was in itself without precedent and illegal – but he was on the losing side for several months.
Meantime the killing machine in Germany ground on. It was only when Morgenthau’s plan to exterminate the German people leaked out to the American Press, which was not entirely Jewish controlled, that Stinson’s view prevailed.
Field Marshall Bernard Montgomery, the British military chief at the time derisively described the planned trials of Germany’s political and military leaders as ‘victors justice.’ They were a mockery of real justice. In planning such ‘war crimes trials’, a dictum of Clausewitz was applied: ‘The pursuit of political aims by other means.’
THE ALLIES QUASI-LEGAL ABATTOIRS The entire quasi-legal process reeked of hypocrisy and double standards. The chief Soviet ‘jurist’ at the Nuremberg Trials was none other than the malevolent Andrej Vyshinsky, the chief prosecutor at Stalin’s 1930s show trials. Those sham trials had horrified the world before the Soviet dictator became ‘Good old uncle Joe (Stalin)’. Victims of those ‘trials’ included hapless British engineers who had been enlisted to work in Russia only to be abandoned when later condemned as ‘imperialist spies.’
Goering spoke of his faith and lack of fear. He had fearlessly faced death many times but hitherto against honorable opponents.
Stalin’s show trials served as a prototype for the military tribunals and Nuremberg ‘trials’ then being set up. These kangaroo courts excluded a defense, relied on evidence obtained through torture and made up laws as they went along.
The wickedness of these trials haunted the British Chief Prosecutor, Sir. Hartley Shawcross, for the rest of his life. He was often heard to declare that he "often inwardly wished that the great allied war criminals, Stalin, Churchill and FDR (Roosevelt) could also be put on trial" Muttering under his breath that the war with Germany had been unnecessary and a terrible mistake leading to Britain’s downfall. Sir Hartley freely and publicly admitted the ghastly mistake but by then it was far too late.
THE WISE TOOK THEIR OWN LIVES In stark contrast to Germany generosity accorded to leaders and governments of countries occupied by the Reich, Germany’s captured leaders suffered as few other captives have in history. All civilized standards were excluded as Asiatic bloodlust for the victors ‘rights’ took hold. The ‘lucky prisoners’ were those who before capture took their own lives and those of their loved ones.As the German leaders were rounded up they were fed into a manic process of humiliation, torture and death. On being seized they were placed in manacles and placed under armed guard. They were then stripped of their uniforms, even in freezing conditions and their decorations and insignia were torn away from them. They were then unceremoniously placed in unheated cells.
In these cells bright lights burned all night and with guards watching over them they were even forbidden to change their sleeping posture. In fact it was common procedure to keep the prisoners awake as a form of torture.
Beatings up were commonplace and typical was the statement proffered by Ken Jones of Wrexham, Wales. This former private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery had been stationed at Heidi in Schleswig Holstein. He described the standard procedure when Rudolf Hoss "whom the Dutch hadn’t been able to break" was brought in to be prepared for interrogation.
PREPARED FOR INTERROGATION Two other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join Rudolf Hoss in the cell to help break him down for interrogation. "We sat in the cell with him night and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to help break down his resistance." bragged the former private."When Hoss was taken out for exercise he was made to wear only jeans and a thin cotton shirt in the bitter cold. The prisoner was simultaneously being starved. After three days and nights without sleep Hoss finally broke down and made a full confession to the authorities." Jones concluded. – Wrexham Leader, October 17, 1986.
Rudolf Hoss was afterwards charged with murdering 2,500,000 Jews, which has since been derided as ludicrous.
Just as typical (thousands of times over) was the torture and murder of Dr. M.M Rost van Tonningen, former High Commissioner for the League of Nations in Vienna and President of the Bank of the Netherlands.
As a prisoner of the allies he was eventually transferred to Scheveningen prison. The term transferred is best considered a laundered expression. On his arrival at the prison he was physically thrown from the vehicle. As his legs had already been tied to a pole and he couldn’t bend them sufficiently to recover his balance he fell to the ground, much to the amusement of his baiters. He was then beaten with poles and told that he would never leave the prison alive. He didn’t.
PERVERTED SEXUAL BRUTALITY From there on his daily routine was a cycle of maltreatment and humiliation which included his being stripped naked and paraded with a line attached to his penis as a bull is baited by pulling the ring through its nose. Such were the horrifying conditions of the hellhole of Scheveningen prison; such were the screams emanating from the prison, that even the local police felt it necessary to intervene.
The brutality persisted and finally the son of the Commander in Chief of the Netherlands Indian Army was beaten to death with a rifle butt, his lifeless body was then hurled over the prison balustrade. Years later his adored wife, Florentine gave an interview to the Netherlands Television Network.
"Everybody thinks my husband committed suicide, which is not true. I did not even get a death certificate. So I contacted the sanitation service since it was they who had carted his body to the cemetery. On the way I learned which cemetery it was, so I looked up the director. I was told that I couldn’t be told anything it was all too secret. But they led me to the area where the graves of the poor where and pointed out to me a mass grave in which my husband was said to rest. Then I went to the hospital and there I learned, my husband had been tortured so horribly, the body couldn’t possibly be shown to the public." – Deutsche Nationalzeitung, July 27 1979.
It should be stressed that these were not isolated incidents and were typical of the treatment meted out to many thousands of prisoners of all ranks by the victorious allied armies.
WOMEN AND CHILDREN BRUTALIZED Even the wives and children of prisoners were not spared and although perfectly innocent they were imprisoned, insulted and abused over long periods of time. A case in point being the wife of Alfred Rosenberg the esteemed National Socialist philosopher and author (The Myth of the Twentieth Century) and his pretty teenage daughter.No family members were allowed to visit the accused though one or two exceptions were surreptitiously made. Never since the English king, after his victory over the French at Agincourt, had personally slit the throats of the captured nobles of France, had such acts of horror been committed.
With fabricated ‘retrogressive laws’ – laws that were invented for the obscene quasi-judicial proceedings, various German ranks were accused of planning and carrying out acts of ‘aggressive war.’ against other countries. The most eminent non-German historians and commentators have since refuted these charges.
Released Soviet archive material has since confirmed the German Reich’s claims that Stalin’s Red Army was poised to attack Western Europe and that Hitler’s reaction was pre-emptive. It is equally now well known that the attack on Poland and France were equally pre-emptive as both of these countries, backed and goaded by Britain, had first declared war on Germany by carrying out acts of war against Germany. France had formally declared war against her peaceful neighbor on September 3rd 1939.
"CYNICAL AND REVOLTING" The German leaders were also falsely accused of having carried out deliberate acts of genocide, an allegation, which has beaten a retreat since the 1950s. Today it finally stands exposed as "The Hoax of the 20th Century"; bogus blackmail to keep Germany in the thrall of a never ending cycle of slavery and national masochism devoted to paying out endless ‘reparations’ to Israel.Of the Nuremberg ‘trials’ Lord Hankey spoke for thousands of others of similar standing who similarly expressed themselves: "There was something cynical and revolting in the spectacle of British, French and American judges sitting on the bench with a colleague representing a country which before, during, and since the trials, had perpetrated half the political crimes in the calendar." - Lord Hankey, House of Lords, May, 5th, 1949.
These show trials were not international at all; just a few of the victor nations were responsible for them; neutral countries representatives were excluded. Even the US Supreme Court washed its hands of any responsibility for them
Before, during and after these ‘trials’ torture of German and other POWs was routine: At the Dachau US Military Tribunals, interrogators posed as priests to extract confessions. The American judge, Edward L. Van Roden, one of the three members of an American Army Commission set up to investigate claims of maltreatment found:
TORTURE OF PRISONERS "Posturing as priests to hear confessions and give absolution; torture with burning matches driven under the prisoners' fingernails; knocking out of teeth and breaking jaws; solitary confinement and near-starvation rations. The statements which were admitted as evidence were obtained from men who had first been kept in solitary confinement for three, four, and five months.... the investigators would put a black hood over the head of the accused and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses. All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. This was standard operation procedure with our American investigators."THE NUREMBERG TRIAL JEWISH RITUAL MURDER Louis Marschalko, Special Correspondent; Playwright and Poet affirmed: "Out of 3,000 people employed on the staff at the Nuremberg Courts, 2,400 were Jews." Many of them wore uniforms to which they had no entitlement.In the Nuremberg courtrooms crowded with exultant Jews a torrent of lies, distortions and fake evidence, provided by bogus witness, were hurled at the ill fated prisoners in the dock. The questioning of witness or their allegations was denied. Each of the prisoners faces revealed evidence of deliberately induced torture and lack of sleep. The verdicts of their vengeful accusers were a foregone conclusion. Denied a proper defense they were to be systematically killed.
All retained their courage to stand up and confront their accusers, vehemently denying the preposterous catalogue of outlandish allegations. The defensive words of the prisoners were summarily dismissed and no appeals were allowed.
On the night of October 15th 1946 – the Jewish Feast Day Hoshana Raba - the American News Service announced at 2.45am that eleven members of the defeated but nevertheless legitimately elected government of Germany had been executed.
GLOATING OVER THE DEAD The executions had begun at 1.00am and ended at 2.15am. The bodies were then laid out in rows for witnesses to inspect and gloat over. However, of the eleven victims Reichsmarshall Herman Goering, the First World War ace fighter pilot had succeeded in cheating his captors by taking his own life in his cell.Details concerning the burial of the eleven martyrs to Germany were kept secret; such was the enormity of the allied crime and the sadistic way by which the wretched prisoners were slain. Furthermore, even in death the victorious allies were mindful of the affection and example, which the executed still held in German hearts. Even the victims families were denied all knowledge of their loved ones final resting places.
In advance of these judicial murders a spokesman for the prison governor had maintained a running public commentary of sickening bad taste on how Goering and the other victims had spent their last days on earth.
The condemned men passed most of their time reading and writing and talking with the two chaplains. Most seemed resigned to their fate whilst Goering spoke of his faith and lack of fear. He had fearlessly faced death many times but hitherto against honorable opponents.
Two of the captives complained about the security regulations requiring the prisoners to sleep with their hands placed outside the filthy blankets. Such was the deliberate stringency of measures against suicide attempts that they were awakened if in their sleep they turned away from the brilliant spotlights shining on their prison beds.
All the prisoners, manacled to guards, took exercise in the corridors of the condemned block except for Goering who for several days declined. When taken to see his wife for the last time he walked briskly ahead and turning to the warder chained to him remarked with a smile: "You see, I am still a Führer (leader)."
STRANGLED TO DEATH Julius Streicher, a man with a finer intellectual mind than has been represented by his gloating Jewish captors and their Gentile propagandists, remained defiant to the end, even hurling abuse at his tormentors. He had held no official position in the government of Germany and throughout the war was a simple farmer. He was hanged merely for exposing and defying Jewish power. The official United States undertaker, who was present at the executions, stated that: "The Jewish-American boy in charge of the execution (of Streicher) let him strangle, horribly for a long, long minute."Admiral Husband E. Kimmel, Commander-in-Chief of the US Fleet shared the outrage of America’s officer class: "The war crimes trials were a reversion to the ancient practice of the savage extermination of a defeated enemy and particularly its leaders."
SICK SNUFF MOVIES At the time of these internationally condemned executions of Germany’s defeated leaders, Sir. Anthony Eden, former British Foreign Minister and leading Conservative rose to his feet in the House of Commons and pointedly asked Clement Atlee, premier of the first postwar Labour government, if as had been rumored a film of the executions had been made. He asked if the government was taking any action to prevent the public exhibition of such film footage.Atlee replied: "My attention has been called to this report. It is inaccurate. The Allied Control Council, on which His Majesty’s Government is represented, decided last week that no cinematographic film or photograph should be taken of the executions. Photographs of the bodies will be taken after death by an official photographer as representative of each of the four powers, record purposes."
But was this true? Although it remains uncertain whether an actual film of the killings was made, executions of Tojo and other Japanese leaders were filmed by their American executioners and shown to the delight of cheering American audiences. Excerpts from this footage were certainly shown on British cinema newsreels.
Eden’s reasons for posing this question remain unknown, but as a former First World War officer who had fought in the trenches he may have felt pangs of guilt and self-loathing. He was also known to be anti-Jewish, a sentiment he shared with Ernest Bevan the then British Foreign Secretary who by then had registered his disgust to the destruction of Germany and its frightful genocidal consequences.
There are in plentiful circulation photographs of the judicially murdered German leaders. These photographs reveal that the men had died a deliberately induced agonizing death with the blood still oozing from their mouths and plenty of evidence of extreme violence to their faces.
CHURCHILL HAS A PEE IN THE RHINE When residing in Cornwall, Mr. Vivian Bird contributor to this essay, happened by chance to be shown copies of these photographs by a former British Army photographer. The proud possessor kept them as gruesome mementos and produced his large collection of looted silver plate bearing the official stamp of Adolf Hitler. These treasures had been looted from Hitler’s Berlin Chancellery.The photographs of their murdered former leaders were distributed among the defeated German people in an attempt to terrify them into the most abject submission. Like Carthage in Roman times Germany was to be reduced to a desert of dust and ashes, removed from the face of the earth along with its people for all time.
Surrounded by grinning staff officers, Churchill had already shown his contempt for European values by standing on the banks of the beautiful River Rhine and urinating into its waters. The viciousness of his Iroquois Red Indian blood was supremely manifest in this unspeakable action.
US Jewish newspapers described one of the principle executioners of the German leadership as "a nice Jewish boy." It was this Jew, John C. Woods (not his real name), a sergeant in the US Army, who ensured that his victims met a prolonged and agonized death, literally by slow strangulation after their faces had been smashed against the side of the execution trap. Asian callousness was having its day and relishing it. One of the other US executioners later committed suicide.
The official British executioner Albert Pierrepoint also supervised the executions and at the time showed no qualms about his dubious place in history. Pierrepoint was of French lineage and later retired to the licensed trade.
DEATHS TOOK TWENTY-FIVE MINUTES Official British government documents recently released for public inspection by the Records Office in Kew, London, reveal that the executions were used to test ‘efficiency methods’ after it was revealed that it had taken up to twenty-five minutes to kill the victims.The experiments disclosed in these files confirm that the hangings did not inflict instantaneous death either by accident or design. The hearts of those hanged could be heard beating after the execution had taken place. Death could only be hastened when doctors (some doctors!) injected chloroform and other substances of a lethal nature.
The experiments at Hamelin during the winter of 1946 involved 64 Germans being executed there after the war’s end following trials based upon evidence that would have been rejected out of hand by any properly constituted legal court.
Because there were batches of as many as thirteen prisoners awaiting execution at any one time, it was felt that there would have been an "inordinate delay" if bodies were left suspended for an hour or more to ensure that the person hanged could not regain consciousness.
MACABRE RITUALISTIC MURDERS The Director of Medical Services asked Dr. F.E Buckland, British Army of the Rhine Assistant Director of Pathology, whether he thought there might be any objection to injecting the body immediately after execution. This would involve a lethal dose of some ‘chemical solution’ to ensure that the body could be taken down without delay. According to the released files, Dr. Buckland felt no ‘ethical objections’ and believed 10% of chloroform was appropriate.The first series of executions on December 13, 1945 were of three women and ten men. The women were hanged one by one, the men in pairs.
According to the file, after the trap was sprung, the medical officer went down the stairs to the room below, where standing on a step ladder, he listened to the beat of the heart for a half minute, and then injected 10% of chloroform. Some he injected directly into the heart, which he noted caused instant heart stoppage. Others were injected intravenously in the arm, which caused the heart to stop within a few seconds.
According to Dr. Buckland all were unconscious before the injections were administered. During the second series of hangings, on March 8th 1946, he decided not to use chloroform. Instead he listened to their hearts through a stethoscope to measure how long it took the victim to die. He recorded the results on a table, which showed that it took between ten and fifteen minutes for audible heartbeats to cease.
In a third series of executions on May 15, 1946, he used the electrocardiograph, an instrument that records the electric activity of the heart. His findings showed that inaudible impulses were produced a further ten minutes. Thus it took some of the victims up to twenty-five minutes to die from the initial drop.
During the macabre experiments two of the victims had started to breathe and had to be injected with chloroform. In one case records show that this took place a full eighteen minutes after the execution.
DOUBLE EXECUTIONS AT HALF HOUR INTERVALS Despite evidence of heart activity for up to twenty-five minutes, Dr. Buckland concluded that in future executions, bodies should be left hanging for fifteen minutes until a heartbeat was no longer audible, instead of the customary hour. This, he surmised, would ‘make it possible to effect double executions at half hourly intervals.’The vengeful victors, whipped up by theatrical Jewish outrage, continue to pursue clandestine murders and long terms of imprisonment of its former foes even to this day. Each murder lengthens an indelible stain across the honour of these British Isles for all time to come. It is hardly surprising that Britain is increasingly regarded as a pariah state throughout the world.
The admiration and respect Britain once regarded as a right has long since evaporated. It is unbelievable in the light of recent events that England ever earned a reputation for decency and fair play. Such goodwill has all but gone. One can only wonder if by the Hand of Nemesis it is now reaping the wind it has sown across Europe. Its present ignominious state can hardly be put down to poor luck.
The greatest irony of all is that whilst Britain stands on the edge of an election predicting unprecedented apathy, in Germany there is an equal unparalleled swing back towards National Socialism.
Germany is now negotiating for the return of its stolen lands, a peaceful and mutually beneficial reconciliation with Russia whilst it turns away from the increasingly backward island, isolated from Europe, across the North Sea. Comparisons are already being drawn between Albany (England) and Albania, another once great country now reduced to Third World status, a European mixed-race has-been nation deserving of contempt.
US Admiral Leahy had concluded his remarks by saying: "I had an uneasy feeling that those eighty million Germans some how or other would survive to fight again."
As a Briton one can only pray that should the Germans ever dominate Europe they will do so with high-mindedness and leave vicious unbridled vengeance to those of far lesser race.
A MICHAEL WALSH / VIVIAN BIRD EXCLUSIVE
Comment: 3 December 2002
Think on these things
From a local perspective —Robbery and Killings.
By Fredrick Töben
A while ago Dr Margaret Tobin, South Australia's top health administration bureaucrat, was gunned down outside her office in Adelaide by a Sydney man whom she allegedly de-registered as a practising psychiatrist. There is a rumour, and I stress it is only a rumour, that Dr Tobin was also clamping down on a legal drug supply that passed through her health services, then reached the open market.
Murders in Australia are becoming more common. So much so that legislators think by introducing stricter gun controls, they will arrest this trend. Definitely far more numerous are the break-ins, muggings, and willful arson attacks. All too often these arise out of the perpetrator's disconnection from societal obligations, from a need to feed some kind of habit that costs money. More horrifying are the thrill-crimes, often of a sexual nature that have no apparent material gain as a motive.
The latter is symptomatic of a total democratisation of public morality — anything goes, and where individuals have disconnected from any form of civilised behaviour.
I am reminded of individuals in relationships who object to committing themselves as such on account of some fear that it may not work out. Yet when such partners couple, then an offspring after nine months is usually the result.
I cannot accept any man's or woman's claim that they didn't know this would happen, or that they were ignorant of how the biological process in basic outline functioned. Yet, all too often there are individuals who claim:" It surprised me, I didn't expect to become pregnant"; or, "I only wanted children but not a man"; or, "I never wanted any children, but I wanted a woman".
I just wonder how many mothers or fathers, who refuse to marry their mate, cannot understand what moral message they are sending to their children. Father won't marry mother; mother won't marry father. I hasten to add that this is certainly not a new phenomenon — it's been with us since the family unit crystalized itself into a formal entity.
The negative message to our offspring is devastating, and many individuals then spend the rest of their life trying to work out why their parents did what they did rather then dismissing their parents as selfish, emotionally immature and irresponsible beings.
Parents who play such games with their offspring are unnecessarily handicapping them by robbing them of their energy even before their children reach puberty. It is difficult enough for any child to get a perspective on things, to begin to develop a morally sound world view without such added burdens imposed upon them by their selfish parents.
Mind you, in our consumer society, it appears that public objections are brushed aside, especially if there is a cushioning effect created through money. It does not amaze me anymore to note how many individuals lose all perspective on moral concerns when the element of money promises a child some material comfort — never mind the child's emotional and mental development.
It is thus not surprising to note how many of our young are literally lost in this world, wasting their time groping at nothing that is character building. Were it a relatively few only, then my concern would be misplaced. However, it is a larger group each year that emerges from the sheltered workshops called schools who are not robust enough to face life without breaking down in some way.
What such youths do in their desperation, and for whatever reason, I would call 'local terrorism'. Snatching old women's bags, for example, is inexcusable. Just the other day a man who wished to help a stranger that some thugs had set upon, was himself knocked senseless. He says he's leaving Adelaide, never to return.
Some critics claim that this local civil disturbance is deliberately nurtured, and that this is the price we have to pay for our policy of giving individuals so much freedom that in their perverse way they are able to self-destruct. Who, after all, wishes to guide our young, offer them a rights of passage, from childhood-youth and into adulthood. Some religious traditions still offer a definite coming of age ritual. In Australia the current end-of-school celebrations take the form of wild celebrations on the Gold Coast and elsewhere.
And what of those who cannot afford to travel, cannot afford to buy alcohol and other drugs?
As late as yesterday, Thursday, 28 November 2002, I spoke with a couple of my neighbours who related how thieves had a few days ago broken into a car and stolen tools, and dug up and removed seven bushes from the front lawn — all during the early hours of the morning.
I relate this in my capacity as a long-standing volunteer with our local community's Neighbourhood Watch organisation.
One of Australian society's great unifying factor is voluntarism. It is always sobering to see Australians pulling together in time of natural catastrophes that regularly sweep the country such as drought, bush fires and floods.
Our local community is supportive of Neighbourhood Watch but there are some critical voices who refuse to make a donation towards the cause. The reason given is that it ought to be the police patrolling the streets and making them safe, not citizens.
What we are experiencing at this micro level is, of course, mirrored at the macro level, in our current attempt to fight terrorism and safeguard our freedom and democracy.
Do we simply hunt down our criminals and imprison them, and build bigger and bigger prisons because the current ones are overflowing? Surely by criminalising our own citizens we are hurting ourselves, or brothers and sisters, our parents and grandparents.
Or, do we also look at the cause and ask the difficult why-question: Why is there this anti-social behaviour? For some it is easier to rely on some worn-out dialectic thought pattern and dismiss those conflicting with the law as less human, as inferior, as deserving of punishment. This thought pattern relies on the them-us, friend-enemy and rejectionist-hatred driven exclusivity pattern that shuns any notion of inclusivity, of belonging, of loving the outsider.
We can directly relate this to a macro-world phenomenon, to the Palestinian tragedy. Why would youngsters martyr themselves for a cause when their other choice is living in subsistence condition and total repression?
What a choice!
And what about when someone wants to steal your cheap oil? And what about when a bully begins to fabricate a story about your intentions so as to distract the world from revealing his own intentions? What about when someone begins legally to defame your good name in order to collect rogue elements around him, therewith then to get control of your mineral wealth? What can you do if that bully has half a million soldiers ready, and is just waiting for a pretext to invade your country?
Iraq is in trouble because of its alleged weapons of mass destruction. North Korea has admitted it, too, has weapons of mass destruction, yet the USA has no interest in gaining control of North Korea. The USA has learned its lesson from the Korean War. If the US attacks Korea, then China enters on the side of North Korea, and that would be the end of the bully Zionist-inspired USA.
Israel has weapons of mass-destruction, and Mordecai Vanunu is still serving time in solitary confinement for revealing this fact to the world. [www.peaceheroes.com/MordecaiVanunu/mvanunu.htm]
When will Israel release this man who converted from Judaism to Christianity in Australia, then on 30 September 1986 was 'stolen' back by Israel and placed in a prison where he remains to this day? What governments of the so-called 'free world' have asked the Israelis to pardon Vanunu?
In any case, North Korea has no valuable oil reserves. That's what this war on terrorism is all about: ownership of resources and trade, and soulless consumerism: money and power.
Not only, of course.
And, let's hope that moral cant will not rear its ugly head within the above reflections, and let us not slip into error and hope that Marxism's 'abolishing the family structure' policy does not again rear its ugly head either.
And let us remain sensitive to the plight facing peoples on the African continent, bearing in mind that no-one need go hungry in today's world.
And let's welcome an end to current Palestinian suffering, and see an end to the war-mongering tyrants who wish to steal Iraq's oil!
Deane Defends battle for truth
Nicolas Rothwell
The Australian, 28 November 2002
Fierce ideological battle has been joined over the the legacy of former governor-general William Deane and his committed campaign to highlight the massacre of Aborigines on the Australian frontier.
Sir William, whose semi-official biography has just been published, weighed in yesterday with a column in the Sydney Morning Herald to defend his position against revisionist critiques.
The most strident of these comes from historian and cultural polemicist Keith Windschuttle, whose core argument against the 'black armband' view of Aboriginal history is his claim that oral testimony from indigenous people is unreliable. He has used the former governor-general's most controversial speech to illustrate his claim.
Sir William, trailed by an ABC television crew, visited Mistake Creek in the East Kimberley in June last year, where he apologised in his own name for a massacre he said occurred there in the 1930s.
But he "got the facts completely wrong", according to a fiery presentation delivered by Windschuttle at the National Museum last December, and "made a fool of himself" as would have anyone relying on uncorroborated oral testimony, he said.
There the matter might have rested, with the former governor-general maintaining a dignified silence, had not another series of broadsides, spurred by Windschuttle's new book, The Fabrication of Aboriginal History, provoked Deane into replying yesterday.
Sir William, while now conceding that the massacre of Mistake Creek took place in 1915, not as he first believed in the 1930s, insists Aboriginal oral history can stand alone as historical evidence.
In the case of Mistake Creek, he says: "The oral history is remarkably strong. It lacks any dreamtime element of the kind that can occasionally lead to confusion between fact and allegory."
Who is right? Neville Green, the leading professional historian of the Kimberley, told The Australian yesterday he felt that on the basis of consistent Aboriginal reports the Mistake Creek massacre had in fact taken place.
Dr Green and other regional historians make qualified use of Aboriginal testimony and says it is backed by clusters of interlocking stories.
"The truth is that the Aboriginal viewpoint can be ephemeral in the telling, as is all oral history — ours as well," Dr Green says. "The plot of stories can change, people can write themselves into old stories, a story can be modified to depend on the audience and the time. What is the role of evidence at the end of the day — to confirm what some people say, or to conceal what others want hidden?"
Fredrick Töben comments: Unfortunately with that 17 September 2002 Federal Court of Australia gag-order hanging over my head, I am unable to say and write what I think. What a pity Revisionists cannot have a fierce debate with the anti-Revisionists and claim truth as our defence!
But I shall risk this: What's new? The matter of that ever illusive clarification ideal being given the run-around by the creation of new stories, re-interpretations, distortions and lying through omission, and even outright lying, is all too familiar a pattern for Revisionists.
After all, it is the love of truth —the foundation on which our civilisation rests — that gives us the moral certainty within a sea of moral and intellectual cowardice to proclaim the various truths that we now hold to be self-evident! The idea of Truth is as strong as the idea of God because God is Truth. It cannot be legislated away, curtailed somewhat but not eliminated because that would also eliminate our own humanity.
The court order of 17 September 2002 prevents me from exploring this issue any further — or face contempt of court charges. I have no fear of the consequences of being in breach of the court order, but it is not worth my while to spend time in prison for that heap of feces called the 'Holocaust'!
That aspect of our history forms a minute though fundamental and crucial picture of our world view — of the larger issue to which we are now a witness: the USA-Zionist-led war for 'freedom' and 'democracy' and on the abstract-concept 'terrorism', and its related physical/concretised form in the shape of Iraq —with the hunt for Osama bin Laden used as a tool to restrain any Moslem interference or direct opposition that may arise as the USA stakes its claim for the possession/control of cheap Iraqi oil. Again, it's as basic as that! Anyone disagree?
22 November 2002
For Reasonable People — It's on in February 2003
We have requested leave to appeal against Justice Branson's 17 September 2002 Judgment before the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia. A date for the hearing will be set sometime after 22 February 2003.
We have engaged a Solicitor, Junior and Senior Counsel who will prepare the matter, and if leave is granted to appeal, then this test case will clarify how much free speech we still enjoy in Australia.
We presented the matters of fact on which our view is founded before the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC), then before a single judge before the Federal Court of Australia (FCA). But all this was ignored as irrelevant because the only thing the Applicant, Jeremy Jones, needed to prove was 'a hurt feeling'. He did not have to prove, through medical reports, the 'hurt' suffered on account of having read our material on Adelaide Institute's website.
Usually in such damages cases, an Applicant needs to produce extensive medical evidence to prove that he has suffered some mental damage. The HREOC commissioner and the FCA judge merely accepted his word as evidence that he has been 'offended' by reading our material. Neither the commissioner nor the judge advised Jeremy Jones to ignore the material, thereby avoiding experiencing a hurt feeling, and thereby exercising his willpower, maturity and moral courage to turn away from our website.
His claim before HREOC and the FCA made him a 'Holocaust' affirmer. But he did not have to provide any proof that the alleged murder weapon existed, or about the alleged six million Jewish deaths. The judge accepted his claim without asking him to substantiate his claims in any way whatsoever.
Instead, the judge handed out a gag-order, which categorically states that certain historical matters — the gassings and the 'Holocaust' — must not he doubted and questioned. The judge has sent a chilling message to any Australian who refuses to blindly accept the orthodox version of an historical event, thereby creating an historical dogma from which no-one may deviate even if this dogma contains factual errors.
In effect the judge has adopted a censorship form that prevailed in all former Soviet Union countries where dissenting individuals were sent to the Gulag prison camps for being 'Revisionists'.
We are at the beginnings of this process in Australia, and Justices Branson and Hely willingly complied with the implementation of such persecution of dissenting opinions.
Australia does not have a First Amendment that guarantees free speech, as the USA enjoys.
Now, at the appeal stage, matters of fact become almost irrelevant and it is now matters of law that will be illuminated, to see whether the judge has erred in law.
We shall also attempt to test the constitutionality of the Racial Discrimination Act. It is our view that the 17 September 2002 FCA Judgment has made Australia a racist country. The judgment has categorized Jewish Australians as a racial entity, which they are not. This is exactly what the German National Socialists (Nazis) did with their Nuremberg Racial Law during the 1930s. It suited the Jewish National Socialists (Zionists) who needed a pretext on which to base their claim to the Moslem and Arabic-speaking land of Palestine.
The latest case on matters 'Holocaust' comes from South Africa.
Muslim radio station victorious in latest round of Shoah-denial case
"I dispute the fact [World War Two Jews] were ... killed by gassing."
- Yacoub Zaki, historian for the Muslim Institute in London, quoted by
the Jewish Telegraph Agency, November 18, 2002
By Michael Belling18 November 2002
www.jta.org/page_view_story
CAPE TOWN - Jewish leaders here are reacting with dismay after their complaint charging a Muslim radio station with trivializing the Holocaust was rejected.
In an acrimonious case, the South African Jewish Board of Deputies had filed
the complaint with the nation's Broadcasting Complaints Commission about a
1998 broadcast on Radio 786, a Muslim station in Cape Town.
Appearing on the program was Yacoub Zaki, a historian at the Muslim Institute
in London. During the broadcast, Zaki said, "I accept that 1 million-plus Jews died
during the Second World War, but I dispute the fact that they were murdered, that they were killed by gassing.
"These people died, like other people in the camps, from infectious diseases, particularly typhus," he said.
The interview prompted a series of legal actions, including one brought before the Constitutional Court, the nation's highest court. In that case, the radio station sought to overturn a section of the broadcasters' code of conduct that prohibits hate speech.
Radio 786 brought the case after the Board of Deputies had lodged a complaint against the station for airing the program, which dealt with the ideology of Zionism and how it resulted in the creation of the Jewish state.
Earlier this year, the Constitutional Court sided with the radio station and struck down several provisions of the Broadcasting Code of Conduct as unconstitutional infringements on the right of free speech.
After that ruling, the Jewish Board of Deputies turned to the Broadcasting Complaints Commission, as it had done previously, in hopes of obtaining a ruling against the radio station.
Now those hopes have been dashed.
In his ruling dismissing the complaint, commission official Roland Sutherland wrote that "the trivializing of the extent of the suffering" of Jews during World War II is "doubtless perceived by many who accept the accuracy of Holocaust evidence as churlish and insulting."
"Nevertheless, in my view, it is not the stuff of which reasonable people take offence to the degree it warrants the proscription of the expression of such views."
Hate speech is not protected under the free speech provisions of the South African constitution, but Sutherland ruled that the broadcast did not fall under the category of hate speech.
Sutherland found there was "no attack in the broadcast on the Jewish religion or Jews as such."
He also ruled that the broadcast had included "no exhortation to hatred of any particular religious group or group of individuals."
The Board of Deputies subsequently issued a statement saying the ruling evoked "a deep sense of shock."
Denying or trivializing the Holocaust is "an attack on the dignity of the Jewish people and not just 'churlish' behavior," the statement said.
Jewish leaders are vowing to keep the case alive.
"We will pursue every avenue open to us to take this matter further," Russell Gaddin, the Board of Deputies' national chairman, told JTA. "We believe we have a case they have to answer."So, it's not all doom and gloom. There are spot-fires breaking out everywhere and the anti-Revisionists are doing everything in their power to put out these liberating fires. We now need your urgent financial support so that we can mount a solid appeal in the Federal Court of Australia and have these matters clarified.
Please send your cheque or cash to:
Toben Defence Fund
P O Box 1137
Carleton 3053
Australia
Direct electronic transfer to:
Toben Defence Fund
National Australia Bank
271 Collins Street
Melbourne 3000
Australia
Account Number: 083.170.54878.5499
This is a test-case, a precedent-setting legal case that will either chill or liberate our enquiry into the truth of contentious historical issues.
19 November 2002
Sir Walter Crocker dies, aged 100, view at Dissenters
The Barbarians at the Gates of Paris. Comment les Etats Unis voient la france
Surrounding the City of Light are threatening Cities of Darkness.
City Journal, Autumn 2002 Vol. 12, No. 4, Theodore Dalrymple
Everyone knows la douce France: the France of wonderful food and wine, beautiful landscapes, splendid châteaux and cathedrals. More tourists (60 million a year) visit France than any country in the world by far. Indeed, the Germans have a saying, not altogether reassuring for the French: “to live as God in France.” Half a million Britons have bought second homes there; many of them bore their friends back home with how they order these things better in France.
But there is another growing, and much less reassuring, side to France. I go to Paris about four times a year and thus have a sense of the evolving preoccupations of the French middle classes. A few years ago it was schools: the much vaunted French educational system was falling apart; illiteracy was rising; children were leaving school as ignorant as they entered, and much worse-behaved. For the last couple of years, though, it has been crime: l’insécurité, les violences urbaines, les incivilités. Everyone has a tale to tell, and no dinner party is complete without a horrifying story. Every crime, one senses, means a vote for Le Pen or whoever replaces him.
I first saw l’insécurité for myself about eight months ago. It was just off the Boulevard Saint-Germain, in a neighborhood where a tolerably spacious apartment would cost $1 million. Three youths—Rumanians—were attempting quite openly to break into a parking meter with large screwdrivers to steal the coins. It was four o’clock in the afternoon; the sidewalks were crowded, and the nearby cafés were full. The youths behaved as if they were simply pursuing a normal and legitimate activity, with nothing to fear.
Eventually, two women in their sixties told them to stop. The youths, laughing until then, turned murderously angry, insulted the women, and brandished their screwdrivers. The women retreated, and the youths resumed their “work.”
A man of about 70 then told them to stop. They berated him still more threateningly, one of them holding a screwdriver as if to stab him in the stomach. I moved forward to help the man, but the youths, still shouting abuse and genuinely outraged at being interrupted in the pursuit of their livelihood, decided to run off. But it all could have ended very differently.
Several things struck me about the incident: the youths’ sense of invulnerability in broad daylight; the indifference to their behavior of large numbers of people who would never dream of behaving in the same way; that only the elderly tried to do anything about the situation, though physically least suited to do so. Could it be that only they had a view of right and wrong clear enough to wish to intervene? That everyone younger than they thought something like: “Refugees . . . hard life . . .. very poor . . . too young to know right from wrong and anyway never taught . . .. no choice for them . . . punishment cruel and useless”? The real criminals, indeed, were the drivers whose coins filled the parking meters: were they not polluting the world with their cars?
Another motive for inaction was that, had the youths been arrested, nothing would have happened to them. They would have been back on the streets within the hour. Who would risk a screwdriver in the liver to safeguard the parking meters of Paris for an hour?
The laxisme of the French criminal justice system is now notorious. Judges often make remarks indicating their sympathy for the criminals they are trying (based upon the usual generalizations about how society, not the criminal, is to blame); and the day before I witnessed the scene on the Boulevard Saint-Germain, 8,000 police had marched to protest the release from prison on bail of an infamous career armed robber and suspected murderer before his trial for yet another armed robbery, in the course of which he shot someone in the head. Out on bail before this trial, he then burgled a house. Surprised by the police, he and his accomplices shot two of them dead and seriously wounded a third. He was also under strong suspicion of having committed a quadruple murder a few days previously, in which a couple who owned a restaurant, and two of their employees, were shot dead in front of the owners’ nine-year-old daughter.
The left-leaning Libération, one of the two daily newspapers the French intelligentsia reads, dismissed the marchers, referring with disdainful sarcasm to la fièvre flicardiaire—cop fever. The paper would no doubt have regarded the murder of a single journalist—that is to say, of a full human being—differently, let alone the murder of two journalists or six; and of course no one in the newspaper acknowledged that an effective police force is as vital a guarantee of personal freedom as a free press, and that the thin blue line that separates man from brutality is exactly that: thin. This is not a decent thing for an intellectual to say, however true it might be.
It is the private complaint of everyone, however, that the police have become impotent to suppress and detect crime. Horror stories abound. A Parisian acquaintance told me how one recent evening he had seen two criminals attack a car in which a woman was waiting for her husband. They smashed her side window and tried to grab her purse, but she resisted. My acquaintance went to her aid and managed to pin down one of the assailants, the other running off. Fortunately, some police passed by, but to my acquaintance’s dismay let the assailant go, giving him only a warning.
My acquaintance said to the police that he would make a complaint. The senior among them advised him against wasting his time. At that time of night, there would be no one to complain to in the local commissariat. He would have to go the following day and would have to wait on line for three hours. He would have to return several times, with a long wait each time. And in the end, nothing would be done.
As for the police, he added, they did not want to make an arrest in a case like this. There would be too much paperwork. And even if the case came to court, the judge would give no proper punishment. Moreover, such an arrest would retard their careers. The local police chiefs were paid by results—by the crime rates in their areas of jurisdiction. The last thing they wanted was for policemen to go around finding and recording crime.
Not long afterward, I heard of another case in which the police simply refused to record the occurrence of a burglary, much less try to catch the culprits.
Now crime and general disorder are making inroads into places where, not long ago, they were unheard of. At a peaceful and prosperous village near Fontainebleau that I visited—the home of retired high officials and of a former cabinet minister—criminality had made its first appearance only two weeks before. There had been a burglary and a “rodeo”—an impromptu race of youths in stolen cars around the village green, whose fence the car thieves had knocked over to gain access.
A villager called the police, who said they could not come at the moment, but who politely called back half an hour later to find out how things were going. Two hours later still, they finally appeared, but the rodeo had moved on, leaving behind only the remains of a burned-out car. The blackened patch on the road was still visible when I visited.
The official figures for this upsurge, doctored as they no doubt are, are sufficiently alarming. Reported crime in France has risen from 600,000 annually in 1959 to 4 million today, while the population has grown by less than 20 percent (and many think today’s crime number is an underestimate by at least a half). In 2000, one crime was reported for every sixth inhabitant of Paris, and the rate has increased by at least 10 percent a year for the last five years. Reported cases of arson in France have increased 2,500 percent in seven years, from 1,168 in 1993 to 29,192 in 2000; robbery with violence rose by 15.8 percent between 1999 and 2000, and 44.5 percent since 1996 (itself no golden age).
Where does the increase in crime come from? The geographical answer: from the public housing projects that encircle and increasingly besiege every French city or town of any size, Paris especially. In these housing projects lives an immigrant population numbering several million, from North and West Africa mostly, along with their French-born descendants and a smattering of the least successful members of the French working class. From these projects, the excellence of the French public transport system ensures that the most fashionable arrondissements are within easy reach of the most inveterate thief and vandal.
Architecturally, the housing projects sprang from the ideas of Le Corbusier, the Swiss totalitarian architect—and still the untouchable hero of architectural education in France—who believed that a house was a machine for living in, that areas of cities should be entirely separated from one another by their function, and that the straight line and the right angle held the key to wisdom, virtue, beauty, and efficiency. The mulish opposition that met his scheme to pull down the whole of the center of Paris and rebuild it according to his “rational” and “advanced” ideas baffled and frustrated him.
The inhuman, unadorned, hard-edged geometry of these vast housing projects in their unearthly plazas brings to mind Le Corbusier’s chilling and tyrannical words: “The despot is not a man. It is the . . . correct, realistic, exact plan . .. . that will provide your solution once the problem has been posed clearly. . . .. This plan has been drawn up well away from . .. . the cries of the electorate or the laments of society’s victims. It has been drawn up by serene and lucid minds.”
But what is the problem to which these housing projects, known as cités, are the solution, conceived by serene and lucid minds like Le Corbusier’s? It is the problem of providing an Habitation de Loyer Modéré—a House at Moderate Rent, shortened to HLM—for the workers, largely immigrant, whom the factories needed during France’s great industrial expansion from the 1950s to the 1970s, when the unemployment rate was 2 percent and cheap labor was much in demand. By the late eighties, however, the demand had evaporated, but the people whose labor had satisfied it had not; and together with their descendants and a constant influx of new hopefuls, they made the provision of cheap housing more necessary than ever.
