Letter from Kaliningrad - Königsberg Fredrick Töben 14 April 2004 Farewell from the European Union – EU – and damned be the German legal ambush that nearly succeeded. Yes, the Germans are at it again … not giving anyone Natural Justice but relying on a legal ambush to have their way with me. The above expressed sentiment is not typically German but it comes out of a Germany that is infested with a foreign mindset that propagates the ‘Holocaust’ dogma. As this ‘Holocaust’ dogma is pure German hatred it is self-evident that Germans who believe in the ‘Holocaust’ dogma are self-hating Germans – and that is very sad indeed. Departing Finland A pleasant night’s rest in Helsinki and a hearty breakfast signified my wellbeing. Yet I always expect the worse and hope for the best – and my Finland departure illustrated how important it is to be prepared for the worse, otherwise our emotions will forever be up and down like a yo-yo. I checked in at the Finair counter, and at Passport Control requested proof of my exit with that clear EU FN stamp in my passport, then settled down in the Finair Lounge. TV showed someone holding up a book: The Diary of Anne Frank followed by Stalin. I could not hear what it was about because the volume was unusually low. Then I saw two burley armed young men in green uniform enter and begin a conversation with the two receptionists. All four, ever so discretely – and separately – glanced towards me. Had I been in a New York subway train carriage such a glance would not have amounted to a challenge, where then someone feels under attack and yells out: “What’re you lookin at me for?” Ever so gently the men slid out the lounge and presently I saw the receptionist walk towards me – a definite walk towards me. Softly she advised me that the two gentlemen outside would like a word with me, and would I please take my coat and bag with me, which I did.  Been there, done that! The powerlessness, if one is a control freak, must be devastating at such moments for those who do not have a clear conscience. The individuals who set such a bureaucracy in motion must inversely feel a great power surge as their will is acted upon, in this instance by two young men just doing their duty, carrying out orders. Outside, the young men, gentlemen rather, advised me that owing to the Schegenin Agreement there is a request from Germany that I not be permitted to enter any of the countries that make up the European, and would I please accompany them to their office just a few paces from the lounge. I didn’t have a choice in this matter, but how often, for example in the US, is it customary to make a big scene and heap embarrassment on the person. I handed over my passport and the letter I had received from the Bundeskriminalamt, Wiesbaden, Germany, wherein it is clearly stated that there is nothing pending on me that would prevent me from travelling to Germany. I also handed over a letter I had written to Judge Adam of the Mannheim Landesgericht wherein I respond to a call I had received from my German lawyer, Ludwig Bock about a month ago. Bock had been contacted by Judge Adam who enquired whether Bock was still my legal counsel of choice. Adam had also advised that my re-trial was to be set down to the first week in May. I advised Bock that this would have to be postponed because of my being engaged otherwise, but any time after May would suit me. My willingness to return to Germany for a re-hearing of my case is on public record because as I wrote to Judge Klaus Kern, the world is my prison, where could I hide then? In my letter to Judge Adam I advised him that Ludwig Bock is not anymore my legal counsel because he fears defending me with vigour on account of the consequences that would have – Bock would be charged again as he and been about five years ago when he defended Guenter Deckert “ too vigorously”,  and that this brought Bock’s mindset close to that of the Revisionists, according to state prosecutor Klein. Bock was duly fined. My legal counsel of choice was therefore a courageous advocate – Horst Mahler who had agreed to take on my defence. Unfortunately since a few days ago Horst Mahler has been debarred from acting for anyone else as a barrister. In his case before Judge Faust Horst Mahler collected numerous writs along the way that emerged out of what he stated in court as part of his defence. In Germany absolute privilege does not attach to court proceedings, and so if you wish to defend yourself against an allegation and counter that or even support it with evidence, then that is additional proof of your “criminal energy” that you are bearing upon the whole situation. Truth is no defence – only a plea for having transgressed and recanting will get you a sympathetic ear from the judge. It is truly witch-trial and Inquisition time in Germany, and this effectively eliminates Mahler from taking on my case and that of other Revisionists – in the foreseeable future at least. The Finnish Border Control gentlemen took copies of my documentation, and they showed me the document that emanated from Germany. It clearly stated that on 9 January 2004 Germany had requested EU member states to refuse me entry because I am now designated as an undesirable person not fit to enter the EU. According to the Schegenin Agreement this means that all EU points of entry have been alerted that my presence in the EU is VERBOTEN! Why wasn’t I advised that my letter had been superseded by this current one? The young men also received from me some additional material that I carried with me. They are all English literate. Apologetically they said they were merely carrying out orders, and that they cannot do anything to change the situation. “You must change it!” they said almost in unison, then again apologized for taking up my time. Did you, dear reader, hear this? Revisionists must change the situation! And so I returned to the lounge where the receptionist welcomed me back without my having to identify myself anew. When I touched down at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo Airport, Overseas Terminal 2, and had my passport stamped by an attractive brunette who said, “Welcome to my country!” I wondered for a moment if that welcome will have to be accepted literally in the near future. We shall see. As I exited the Passport Control and customs, I almost felt at home – and safe. A couple of individuals hawked for taxis, and another advised me that the transfer to the domestic terminal was free and I should go to “that” counter. My onward flight to Konigsberg was secured. PS: The individuals I was supposed to meet at Amsterdam and Helsinki had cancelled the treff a few days before. Coincidence? Of course! Anyone who now says that Revisionists are imagining their own persecution have proof that this legal persecution is real. It is world-wide, as currently exemplified by Ernst Zundel’s senseless imprisonment. Question: Who stands behind the enforcers of this ‘Holocaust’ dogma’religion? I as again: What is my crime? Is it because I refuse to believe in the things that I believe didn’t happen? I have always been a law abiding citizen in whichever country I happen to find myself. I have never distributed any so-called ‘ Holocaust’  material in Germany, and the material on our website is there for those who are interested in reading it. No-one is forced to look at that material, and if by accident anyone stumbles on to it, then surely it is that person’s moral duty, that person’s freedom of choice to either go on reading or switching off. That’s what free speech is all about. Nowhere have I been charged with any crime, except in Germany, the country of my birth. What individual mindset is it that seeks to criminalize thinking – and why? Can it be reduced to that simplistic formula – battle of the wills? Over to you for comments.