It is not really a surprise that many of the "alternative dissident"
publications that have chosen to ignore 9/11 and the war on terror, except for
bland pronouncements in favor of world peace instead of world war, are funded by right-wing, oil money connected foundations.

Date: Tue Dec 9, 2003 2:14:11 PM Canada/Eastern

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles7/Jones_Protocols-Neocons.htm

The Protocols - a Neocon Manifesto

by Simon Jones

Dissident Voice August 21, 2003

I have to confess. The outrageous in-your-face behavior of the neocons finally
got to me -as Armageddon approaches, after seeing more and more references to
it (albeit usually wacky), I recently downloaded the Protocols of the Elders
of Zion. Guiltily, mind you, as if it were Mein Kampf or porno. I bet you
haven't dared (or bothered) to read it.

So what is this best-selling political tract of the 20th century, the reading
of which carried the death penalty in Stalinist Russia, lauded by the likes of
Henry Ford and Winston Churchill, and then loudly condemned for the past 60
years since it was briefly declared an anti-Semitic forgery (in a Swiss court
in 1935 overturned by the Appeals Court in 1937)?

The bile aside, it is in fact a series of 24 mostly articulate, well-argued
lectures outlining a plan for world capitalist domination, with sharp
political and social analysis, lots of Machiavelli and a Marxian
sophistication in its understanding of capitalism and historical processes.
Briefly, it outlines a plan of world conquest by first establishing world
government by consent. As with any brilliant political analysis, it has been
denounced, dismissed, misinterpreted and banned. And made very good use of by
those lusting for world power.

What immediately struck me was that with a little dusting off, abridging and
updating, it could easily be the handbook of the neocons. With the wonders of
modern computers, you can download a free copy from the Internet, cleanse it
of anti-Semitism by replacing "fellow Jews" with "neocons" and make sense of
what's happening in the world today.

Mysterious origins? Not really

Though its origins are still unknown, it was clearly inspired by the French
revolution and its aftermath, the then-popular Masonic order, and most of all
the nascent 19th century Zionist movement. All that we know is that it was
written in France and brought to Russia, supposedly in 1884. It first appeared
in print in St Petersburg in 1903, but reached the West only after the Russian
revolution. It caused an immediate sensation, originally crudely interpreted
as foretelling the Bolshevik revolution as the crucial link in a Jewish
conspiracy to rule the world. As such, it was admired by the likes of
Churchill and Ford, both confirmed anti-communists and anti-Semites.

True, it has the prescience to allow for an anti-capitalist revolution on the
way to its final goal, but there's nothing even vaguely socialist in it. It's
firmly founded on a plan for capitalist domination through Jewish control of
international finance and just happened to appear at the very moment of the
founding of the Zionist movement, with its goal of establishing as soon as
possible a Jewish state in Palestine, backed by powerful worldwide Ashkenazy
Jewish economic interests.

It's as if an especially ruthless and well-read 19th c Zionist, inspired by
the Rothschilds and other great Jewish financiers of the time, wrote it or
most of it, as I am sure is the case. Really, it reads as if it were written
by the Jungian shadow of the likes of Zionism's founder, Theodore Herzl, or
any of Israel's notables from Ben Gurion to Ariel Sharon. Its anti-goyim
callousness certainly indicate it was not written for public consumption, and
after Hitler, it was relegated to the Forbidden Shelf in ALL libraries along
with Mein Kampf and naked bottoms. But it is very hard to believe that it is a
spoof or a mere provocation, as it is just too impressive in detail and
understanding of the logic of late 19th c capitalism.

Did Hitler read it? I bet the Nazis read it carefully. They certainly followed
much of its advice, from how to use the press, to how to manipulate both
politicians and the masses in consolidating their political hold. It's also
clear why destruction of the Jews became Hitler's tragic obsession. His New
World Order (NWO) would have to exclude a group even remotely connected with
such a scheme for world domination. As the neocons warn today: "You are either
with us or against us."

Many paths - but they all lead to Rome

The trouble with the Protocols is that it has been interpreted since it was
published to suit the prejudices of the moment. In pre- revolutionary Russia,
it provided fuel for the already widespread Russian anti-Semitism. In post-WWI
Europe and America, it provided fuel against the Russian revolution. In the
post-WWII world, it became the Bible of American isolationists and racists who
see the poor UN as the dreaded "World Government," backed by the Soviet Union
and 3rd world revolutions. Now it is read by Muslims as proof of the
conspiracy by US imperialism to destroy them.

Another problem is that there have been many variations on the theme of the
NWO ever since the collapse of the Roman Empire. The French revolution and
Napoleonic conquests, the Masonic lodges, imperial Germany and England all
have had their own NWO fantasy. The Russian revolution was the most radical
attempt at a NWO, and even can be distinguished for the large number of Jews
who took part, but despite the fact that the Protocols was first published in
Russia and strictly banned during the Soviet period, the Soviet experiment was
not even remotely the final World Government of the Protocols, as it was
anti-capitalist in its essence.

The red herring in it is of course 'Jewish', which is supposed to refer to a
race. The Jews referred to in the Protocols are the European Ashkenazy Jews,
who had been traditionally usurers and who were in the 19th century becoming
increasing wealthy and part of the mainstream European culture. From them
sprang the Zionists, who transformed a religion where God is to bring them to
the 'promised land' someday into an active plan to seize Palestine based on
their growing international economic and financial might. So it is this group
that is the real inspiration behind the Protocols and not some amorphous
Jewish RACE. Think of the authors as the neocons of the day. For by the 19th
century, usury was the norm, and the rapid spread of capitalism meant that the
Western world effectively became Jewish, as Marx put it, and adopted the
Jewish idea of success.

Yet another problem. It is loudly dismissed as a forgery. Hello? It was
anonymous, so how can it be a forgery. Who forged what? No wonder the Swiss
Appeals Court threw the case out. In that case we can dismiss the Bible as a
forgery. And who cares who wrote the Psalms anyway? They stand on their own
merits, as does the Protocols stripped of a few provocative phrases here and
there, which could have been slipped in by anyone.

You may well protest: "The Protocols attributes the conscious machinations of
Jews to be behind all historical developments. I don't believe the Zionists
are either so powerful, or so far- sighted." In answer: It's not necessary for
our actions to be premeditated. The logic of world capitalism sweeps us along,
whether we like it or not. Some players are more conscious (and ruthless) than
others. They become the Herzls, the Wolfowitzes, the Sharons. The rest of us
get swept along, either yielding to, or fighting the current: the Bushes and
the Schwartzeneggers or the goyim. The Protocols (or its original, if it is
indeed a forgery) was inspired by the new economic system sweeping the world,
and composed by the 19th century equivalent of the neocons. It hasn't played
itself out yet, just as capitalism hasn't played itself out. We ignore it at
our peril.

Arise, ye prisoners of starvation?

Contrast the Zionist movement with the other great attempt at a NWO from the
19th century on -- the world socialist movement. It is far weaker, split by
nationalism and hundreds of ideological splinters, and motivated by social
justice, a far less competitive motivation that money, wealth and
power-for-its-own-sake. The Protocols is quite clear about this: "Our triumph
has been rendered easier by the fact that in our relations with the men whom
we wanted we have always worked upon the most sensitive chords of the human
mind, upon the cash account, upon the cupidity, upon the insatiability for
material needs of man: and each one of these human weaknesses, taken alone, is
sufficient to paralyze initiative, for it hands over the will of men to the
disposition of him who has bought their activities." (I)

There is no fear of the dangerous effective of democracy: "The abstraction of
freedom has enabled us to persuade the mob in all countries that their
government is nothing but the steward of the people who are the owners of the
country, and that the steward may be replaced like a worn-out glove. It is
this possibility of replacing the representatives of the people which has
placed them at our disposal, and, as it were, given us the power of
appointment." (I)

Socialism never had a chance against this corrosive Machiavellianism, though,
just in case, the Protocols had a plan: "The hour strikes when, not for the
sake of attaining the good, not even to win wealth, but solely out of hatred
towards the privileged, the lower classes of the goyim will follow our lead
against our rivals for power, the intellectuals of the goyim." (IV) This is
the only reference to the use of a revolt of the masses, which was seized upon
to associate the Protocols with the Russian revolution. Rather slim pickings,
and it reveals the strategy is to undermine the "intellectuals of the goyim",
i.e., the socialist opposition to world capitalism.

On the contrary, the Russian revolution seemed to really shake the very
foundations of the plan for world capitalist domination. Curiously in its
first 30 years the SU had the Zionists split. Why? Well, no doubt partly
because many rank-and-file Zionists were socialist by persuasion, truly wanted
the SU to succeed and hoped for a socialist Israel as a bonus (Herzl's utopian
novel depicts a socialist Israel). But for the Zionist fanatics of the
Protocols, their fence-sitting was because achieving their own state was the
main priority, and required the support of both the communist and capitalist
camps.

And as for the softer versions of socialism which have surfaced occasionally
in the West, their headway has always been kept well in check, and social
democratic reforms were rolled back very easily after the collapse of the SU,
via the tactics envisaged in the Protocols. So the plan of the Protocols
should not be confused with the many variations on a socialist/ communist NWO.

If you can't beat 'em, join 'em

The Protocols also lauds "the successes we arranged for Darwinism, Marxism,
Nietzscheism." (II) Why promote such radicals? Because of the "disintegrating
importance these directives have had upon the minds of the goyim." Just how
central to Marx's success these Zionists were is debatable.

But it's become clear to me that Zionists have penetrated and tried to control
all the NWO fantasies, from left to right, to further their own cause. It is
not surprise then that they have been at the center of the present neocon
insurgency from the start. And as for the EU-as-NWO, Sharon even suggested
Israel should join the EU since 'we share common ideals'. In spite of Israel's
loathing for the UN, it is at the very heart of THAT beleaguered, clumsy
organization too (with a stake in hand just in case, it can be argued). It has
recently been revealed that Zionists are even involved with extreme right
anti-Semitic movements in Europe and with the creation of Hamas. After all,
anti-Semitism is the Zionist's best defense. "The Jewish group has thrived on
oppression and on the antagonism it has forever met in the world." (Albert
Einstein, Collier's Magazine, November 26, 1938)

True, anti-Semitism got out of control under Hitler and it even looked like it
was touch-and-go for a while for the Ashkenazy Jews of Europe, but fascism was
in turn destroyed by a capitalist-communist alliance, with Zionists at its
heart, as the Protocols so brilliantly foretold: "For a time perhaps we might
be successfully dealt with by a coalition of the goyim of all the world: but
from this danger we are secured by the discord existing among them whose roots
are so deeply seated that they can never now be plucked up." (VI) Divide and
rule!

The Holocaust gave the fanatical Zionists their long-sought state, which
allowed them to discard any socialist pretensions and nurture the
capitalist-Zionist alliance essential to the goal of world domination. The
defining moment is perhaps the triumph of the neocons under Reagan in the
1980s. The Zionists had consolidated their hold on American foreign policy
under Democrat Carter, and were ready to make the alliance official under
Republican Reagan. It is at this point that the very term Zionist and even Jew
can be discarded. As I have argued elsewhere, 'We are all Jews now.'
(http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles4/Jones_Palestine.htm) And with the
Bush coup in 2000, we all (for the present at least) have become neocons (or
goyim). As the opposition grows weaker, with the shield of the Holocaust at
the ready, the neocon-Zionist alliance has begun to act more and more brazenly
to consolidate its hold on the world and destroy the last meaningful
resistance - the Islamic world.

The ultimate trump card

Not only was the Holocaust and the way to defeat it foreseen in the Protocols,
but, like the anti-Semitism that gave rise to it, it has been turned into the
ultimate defense of the Zionist cause. A kind of perverse win-win situation
for the Zionists.

It transformed important anti-Semites into Judeophiles overnight. While
Churchill was an enthusiastic reader of the Protocols before WWII, he became
an enthusiastic supporter of the foundation of Israel after, and shifted his
anti-Semitism onto the Arabs. Stalin, also a confirmed anti-Semite, provided
the key vote at the UN to approve the foundation of Israel and supplied
crucial arms via Czechoslovakia to the beleaguered state, foolishly thinking
he could ultimately manipulate. Ha, ha! Finally it became the linchpin in
consolidating today's neocon-Zionist alliance, and a brilliant defense for all
manner of Zionist crimes: "We can do anything to defend ourselves after the
Holocaust!"

The icing on the cake is the impressive Holocaust museum which blends in
tastefully with the Lincoln and Washington memorials in the heart of
Washington, D.C. (Note: There is no museum to the Holocaust against the native
peoples or the blacks.)

A crack in the wall?

While 'Old Europe' has made some noises about this lethal NWO, the governments
are nonetheless beholden to it, and can do little but try to carve a slightly
bigger piece of the pie. No, the only meaningful remaining resistance to the
neocon-Zionist NWO is the as yet unbrainwashed goyim of the world - the peace
movement and the Islamic world, strange bedfellows at best.

However, there are some disturbing ripples in the NWO waters. Bush/ Sharon
have chosen the warpath, while the Soros branch, which includes Europe, wants
a more peaceful transition. The reckless policies of the erstwhile "servile
administrator" in Washington are quite possibly endangering the very economic
foundation of the NWO. The Protocols foresees such chaos, though it presumes
to be in control of it: "We shall soon begin to establish huge monopolies,
reservoirs of colossal riches, upon which even large fortunes of the GOYIM
will depend to such an extent that they will go to the bottom together with
the credit of the States on the day after the political smash...." (VI)

Such a collapse of the present world financial system is not at all beyond the
realm of possibility. And if it comes, it could take down the US government
and the neocons with it. It is here that the PROTOCOLS begins to unravel. The
Protocols assumes the corporate financial cabal controlling the world economy
will be invited to take over bankrupt governments with their World Government,
as indeed has been happening under the guise of IMF restructuring programs and
more recently by direct invasion. But the bankrupt and invaded countries, such
as Argentina, most of Africa, Afghanistan, Iraq for starters are proving to be
problematic, more than the cabal can digest.

Maybe, just maybe, the neocons' gamble will trip them up before they reach the
finish line and they will end up along side the despised GOYIM at the bottom.
A switch to a gold dinar in the Muslim world and oil-euros for the rest would
seriously endanger the NWO, as would a massive ecological disaster, natural or
man-made.

The mild neocons (Soros etal) see this clearly and are scurrying to minimize
collateral damage. Theirs is a strategy closer to the spirit of the Protocols
- no overt wars, a careful amassing of power through education and the control
of the press, no dangerous splits in the capitalist-Zionist alliance,
achieving victory through financial and trade blackmail. Have a look at the
Protocols yourself. It's all there.

So, are these cowboy jackboot high jinks a momentary glitch in the triumphal
march to the neocon-Zionist paradise? Will a Howard Dean, urged on by Soros,
put the out-of-control steamroller back on its proper path? Or has the
Protocols played itself out? Is our present apocalyptic scenario instead a
crack that gives us hope of emerging from this nightmarish plot?

Rational racism?

I don't know about the Elders, the Symbolic Snake, the actual killing off of
the goyim, whether the line of King David will be re- established to rule the
world, the importance of the Masons, or whether the French Revolution "was
wholly the work of our hands". There's surprisingly little of such bile for a
work of such notoriety, and it can be easily edited out so as not to distract
from the sharp analysis. Perhaps it was added by an anti-Semite as a
provocation. Who knows? As for the Masons, come to think of it, the popularity
of them, the Yale Skull and Bones, and other such Monty- Pythonesque groups
shows a stubborn inclination by would-be GOYIM leaders to voluntarily (i.e.,
consciously or unconsciously) make themselves part of a world conspiracy,
however idiotic.

That's not so much the problem. The major flaw behind the logic of the
Protocols is its basic premise - that there is a Jewish race. There is only
one race - the human race. Just have a look at Israeli society if you think
there is a racial basis to Judaism. But hey! Scientists are discovering that
there are genes which are responsible for skin color, that define risk-takers
or those susceptible to various diseases. Maybe there's a gene for these
would-be Elders of Zion. Perhaps the NY Times will post the following soon:
The Zionist- neocons now welcome to their fold those who share their lust for
capitalist world domination. All those with gene DN145, please sign up here.
We are all equal before Mammon. MBA schools will go crazy.

The Masonic lodges, Skull and Bones fraternities, the Jewish 'race' itself are
just foils in this march of world capitalism, gathering in like-minded wanabes
as it makes its final push for total control. It is somehow fitting that the
once reviled Jew should sit one day on the world's golden throne surrounded by
his neocon minions. That is the Protocols' vision of the end of history. Eat
your heart out Fukuyama!

Simon Jones is a Canadian freelance journalist living in Uzbekistan. He writes
for Peace Magazine (Toronto) and has published pieces in Counterpunch and
YellowTimes.org. He can be contacted at sj958@yahoo.com