Dear Fellow Patriot!

The Republican National Convention in New York is on
its way. The media is doing a hatchet job and displays
an incredible bias when reporting about the
convention.

I still get the many e-mails, pointing out the evil
that Bush does. Some are very emotionally charged and
without reasoning. Don't misunderstand me, I do not
support George W. Bush and his handlers. I never have.
However, I also do not support the Democratic
nomination for the White House. John Kerry is a
self-admitted war criminal, and only in America is it
possible for people like him to run for office.

I have been very active in both parties, over time in
my life. I even sat on the Republican National
Committee. I ran for office as a Republican, and I got
an inside look into both parties. Not just on a local
level, even though everything starts on the local
lever, but also state and federal.

I am opposed to immigration, to affirmative action
programs and to many of the social programs. Since I
am not a minority, and a hard worker, I do not support
gun control. Vehemently I oppose it. These are all
things that the Democratic Party stands for.


If you take a closer look at our House and Senate, you
will notice that all Jews in political office are
Democrats. That goes also for the local and state
level.

I have learned to despise the group-hugging, phony
policies of the Democrats. Sure, the Republicans have
changed a lot, but if I have to weigh it out, I still
come out on the Republican side.

Unless there is a viable third party, I will not throw
away my vote for some Ralph Nader type who will affect
my life tremendously.

See, the problem is, when I shut down this computer, I
have to go back to the real world. That means a
working world of taxes, laws, and restrictions. Most
of them came from the Democrats. I am not talking
about the Patriot Act. I am talking about half of my
salary being used to support the scum of the urban
landscape of America. Because in reality, most of us
own a house, have a mortgage payment and are taxed out
of our minds to support the liberal agenda.

Many of you complain about all of the Jewish advisors
or the handlers of George W. Bush. What do you think
John Kerry will have? He will just as much serve the
master as Bush does.

I am not necessarily against war. Because if some evil
force is attacking my family, my livelihood, or me it
means war. And I am not afraid to terminate.

So what can I tell you? Everyone has to make us
his/her own mind. But please don't give me the
ludicrous unrealistic manure that I keep on hearing.
In today's political era there is hardly anyone left
that is worth voting for. If they are experienced in
politics, then they are bad. The ADL and the
Democratic Party make sure that the new generation of
politicians will be worse than the old one. Unless the
71% of the population of European-Americans wakes up
and creates a viable third party, not much will
change.

In the meantime, I'll beg your pardon that I - for
once - for my own welfare.

On the same subject, from William Henry Harris:

[START]

Guess who's endorsing John Kerry?

The Communist Party of The United States of America,
CPUSA, is publicly supporting the election of John
Kerry.

No, this is not a typo ... you read it correctly. The
CPUSA has made available on its Web site,
www.cpusa.org, an advertisement entitled Top Ten
Reasons to Defeat Bush. This advertisement can be
downloaded. The Communist Party urges readers to place
this ad in local newspapers throughout the country to
defeat President Bush.

Remarkably, the "Top Ten Reasons" of the Communist
party are identical to those of the Democratic party;
out-sourcing, homosexual rights, abortion and the
like.

At first, it was thought that "this was only a
coincidence." The Democratic Party of the United
States couldn't be in lock step with the Marxists! So,
the originator of this e-mail wrote to a spokesman of
the CPUSA in Georgia and here is part of the
spokesman's letter: "The CPUSA supports the John Kerry
campaign with donations and volunteer effort. We
believe that defeating George Bush is the single most
important issue this November"

**Next, it was discovered that one of Kerry's campaign
themes is "Let America be America Again." This slogan
was borrowed from a Communist poet, Langston Hughes.
This is not common knowledge to the average American.
"Let America be America Again" sounds good but is a
rambling, gloomy poem.

Interestingly, another poem by Langston goes as
follows; "Goodbye, Christ Jesus, Lord, God, Jehovah,
Beat it on away from here now. Make way for a new guy
with no religion at all -- A real guy named Marx,
Communist, Lenin, Peasant, Stalin, Worker, ME -- I
said, ME!"

Then, if this was not convincing enough that the
Democratic party has lost it, a third discovery!

**A Vietnam vet group took a trip to Communist Hanoi
to investigate a report that John Kerry was in the
"Hanoi Hall of Fame." Yes, there is a museum in Hanoi
with a section dedicated to foreign activists who
helped defeat the United States Military in Vietnam.
Of course, you would expect Jane Fonda's picture to be
there. But, alas, there is John Kerry's picture
shaking the hand of a Communist official.

Never has there been such a tragedy! Never has there
been such a threat to America! Has the Democratic
party has been taken over by the far, far left?

It's not only the communists but the homosexual
activists who are appalled that George Bush is married
to a woman! They are enraged that the President wants
a constitutional amendment to protect traditional
marriage between a man and woman.

Then we have the ACLU running to a federal activist
judge with every piece of legislation that doesn't fit
into their leftist agenda. They support every
Democratic socialist whim. The removal of the Ten
Commandments is their top priority!

Don't trust this message for the truth -- visit the
CPUSA website at www.cpusa.org -- read the articles,
and then decide for yourself.

So...who will you vote for during the next
Presidential Election?

This message needs to be seen by your friends...send
it to them!

Have good day

[END]

*******************************************************

Alex Linder, owner of Vanguard News Network, is back
from vacation. Good stuff on his website. While I
disagree with the racial slurs of some of his writers,
I can't help to tell you that he runs one of the best
interactive website in cyberspace. I enjoy many of his
exclusive writers, such as Rich Brooks, and I think
his perseverance in the face of spiteful gossips will
make him a long-term contender.

Today, I found an awesome article on his website by
Max Hadden. If I g through the trouble of forwarding
it to you, you'll bet its worth your time. Mr. Hadden
uses a different terminology as I do, but basically, I
agree with him. So enjoy:

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/

[START]

Understanding Hitler

by Max Hadden

30 August 2004

It doesn't both me anymore when the ignorant lemmings
bash Hitler and the Third Reich on countless internet
websites, but when unwarranted criticism of National
Socialism and its leaders appear on VNN, then I must
speak out, as Ernst Zundel once said, for those
Germans who can't defend themselves. The author of the
recent article "A Weak Message Forecasts Future
Failure" makes the true but rather obvious
observations that an organization that has no strong
message or corrupt leaders isn't going to be
successful. The author then proceeds to criticize
Hitler as well as the "weak" message of National
Socialism. Neither of these criticisms contain any
merit and the very fact that they were made indicates
either a lack of knowledge or anti-German prejudice,
or perhaps both. However, I am not as paranoid as some
so-called leaders in the struggle for the plight of
the White race who see COINTELPRO operations behind
every criticism of the White Nationalist movement or
its important historical figures. Valid criticisms of
any White leaders or organizations should and can be
made as long as they are based on verifiable facts.

National Socialism A "Weak" Message?

In an amazing example of irony the author stated that
Commander George Lincoln Rockwell's American Nazi
Party was the most successful racial organization in
American history, but then goes on to proclaim that
"Americans fought against Germans because Hitler's
National Socialist message was weak!" So if Commander
Rockwell's message was strong, and it was a National
Socialist message, then how could Hitler's National
Socialist message be weak? This is obviously a false
belief. First off, let's discuss what Commander
Rockwell said as to what makes a strong message. In a
lecture recorded in a secret gathering held in Dallas,
Texas, of pro-White supporters (I can't locate this on
the internet as digital audio for download, but the CD
is available here). Commander Rockwell says that the
problem with all the other political parties except
for National Socialism is that their messages were
aimed at people's brains instead of their hearts. In
other words, since the masses of people will not study
and have the attention span of a cat, the best or
strongest message is always an emotional one, not an
intellectual one. And the most emotional subjects
always revolve around family, friends, and loved ones,
which ultimately leads to the entire race as extended
family. This is the heart of National Socialism. Along
with fundamental policies that naturally emerge from
National Socialist philosophy -- such as Germany
should be ruled by Germans, not Jews. Just like
America and every other formerly White nation should
be run by Whites, not by Jews.

And where did Commander Rockwell learn this idea about
emotional rather than intellectual messages? "The
people in their overwhelming majority are so feminine
by nature and attitude that sober reasoning determines
their thoughts and actions far less than emotion and
feeling." Mein Kampf, vol. 1, ch. 6: 'War Propaganda.'


Something I'd heard once before, but didn't believe it
until I heard it stated in another way by Ernst Zundel
(http://www.zundelsite.org/radio/5th_estate.ram), was
that the Germans had higher average IQ's than most
other Europeans and this is why they could comprehend
more easily the various details and gems of wisdom
that were expressed in Mein Kampf. As Herr Zundel
pointed out, Germany had a higher percentage of Nobel
Prize winners than any other country at the time of
the rise of the NSP. The Germans were voracious
readers on the whole which would seem quite natural
since, thanks to Gutenberg, they were the first to
produce and distribute printed material on a mass
scale. If one examines the leadership of NS, for
example in a biographical profiles booklet put out by
the Third Reich in 1938, one discovers an
exceptionally high rate of men with doctorates. From
the table of contents, out of 26 leaders, 10 of them
have doctorates (Goebbels, Frick, Guertner, Frank,
Dorpmueller, Ohnesorge, Lammers, Meissner,
Seyss-Inquart, and Ley).

Incidentally, another claim that the author of the
article in question tries to make was that Hitler was
corrupted or essentially bought off by the "German
rich" and points to Count von Stauffenberg. I will go
into more detail about a particular incident of the
war the author relates that makes Hitler appear
incompetent later, but suffice it to say that the
political profiles booklet demonstrates that many of
the "German rich" were on Hitler's side as opposed to
the oddball out, von Stauffenberg. Some rich German NS
leaders were; Joachim von Ribbentrop, Baron Constantin
von Neurath, Count Schwerin von Krosigk, and Baldur
von Schirach (and possibly a few others are part of
the upper class rich who simply do not have patents of
nobility). Others wealthy aristocrats such as Prince
August Wilhelm were prominent National Socialists as
well, but there's no time to mention them all.

One National Socialist agenda item was decreasing
class strife. Class division is inevitable given the
natural biological separation of people of any race
into occupations requiring varying levels of IQ, but
class conflict is not inevitable and was greatly
reduced if not entirely eliminated in NS Germany.

Another point about reading and comprehension is in
order too. I agree that there's a lot of verbiage in
Mein Kampf that was intended to put things in the
proper historical perspective for the ignorant that
makes for dry reading, but at the same time, one can
find in it a gold mine of wisdom over a comprehensive
list of subjects that are explained in a matter of a
few sentences quite clearly and with flawless logic.
As for example, what Hitler has to say about
conscription (which I'll leave to the interested
reader to figure out). For a humorous anecdote about
reading comprehension I'm always reminded of that
brilliantly made comedy "A Fish Called Wanda" where
the dialogue was something like, "Monkeys read
Nietsche too, Otto, they just don't understand it."


Why Did the Americans Fight the Germans?

The author's statement, "Americans fought against
Germans because Hitler's National Socialist message
was weak!", assumes that American masses had heard
Hitler's message in one way or another -- which is
completely incorrect. The Jews had a stranglehold on
the mass media just as they do today. If one
understands the basic reality that no one hears a
pro-White message anywhere in the mass media or hears
the truth about the Jews, then one knows that the
situation was no different in 1930's America when
there was no internet. In fact the only
German-Americans who knew the truth were those who
received letters from their relatives in NS Germany or
who had visited the country. For a real explanation as
to why White Americans fought the Germans one only has
to listen to what Commander Rockwell said in the first
part of his (Brown University speech). Rockwell
actually helped sink some German U-boats for which he
hated himself for and tried to make amends the rest of
his life. Briefly, Rockwell said that the reason that
he enlisted is because he believed all the lies he had
been told that Hitler wanted to take over America and
even the entire world.

Here's where some valid criticism of Hitler and the
National Socialists can really be made, maybe. Why
didn't Hitler travel the world, or have Goebbels or
others do so, to make absolutely certain that the
British, French, and American people heard the
ideology of National Socialism? Speaking limited
English or French was an obvious barrier, although
surely there were others who could speak just as
eloquently in the proper language? Goebbels did
address the French in person once that I'm aware of,
but only during the so-called "occupation government"
of the pro-National Socialist French leader
Henri-Phillipe Pétain.

One can speculate that the Jewish FDR (Dutch name
Rosenveldt) and his Jewish Communist sympathizer
buddies (Frankfurter, Morgenthau, White, et al) would
not have been allowed to continue in office waging a
secret war against the Germans if the NS message had
been heard and all the Jews been put on a boat to
Madagascar or somewhere. FDR also provoked the
Japanese unnecessarily (the Germans were ignorant of
this and were more surprised that the Japs attacked
Pearl Harbor than the politicians in our American
government were). By default, a war with the Axis
power of Japan, which also wanted to defeat Jewish
Communism, meant war with Germany. The fact was that
by 1939 war with Poland was inevitable, not because of
the Germans, but because of the Poles and their Jews
(http://www.cwporter.com/letter13.htm). Perhaps if the
leaders in France, Britain, and America had known of
the Jewish problem as explained by National
Socialists, they wouldn't have fought, as Commander
Rockwell once commented, on the wrong side.

In fact, so frightened were the Jews that the
Americans would learn that they'd made a mistake
fighting Germany and the disastrous war had been
caused by Jews everywhere that the U.S. had a policy
of non-fraternization with German civilians that
General George S. Patton bitterly (rebuked). Patton
couldn't understand the policy and felt it would be
good for the Germans to talk to the Americans, since
Germans were so ignorant (haha) about Americans and
all. In reality it was for what the Germans would tell
the ignorant Americans that the gag order was levied.
Patton eventually realized, just as Commander Rockwell
did, that Americans fought the wrong enemy. After a
visit to ruined Berlin, he wrote his wife on July 21,
1945: "Berlin gave me the blues. We have destroyed
what could have been a good race, and we are about to
replace them with Mongolian savages. And all Europe
will be communist."

The answer to why the Americans fought is simple:
National Socialism never reached the ears of the
American people who were lied into a war against
Germany by the Jews in America. This brings up
something -- one particularly pro-German American
skinhead once told me that he was more pissed off at
the so-called "greatest generation" of Americans than
he was at Jews and Africans. It was they who fought
against and defeated the pro-White pro-European
civilization and culture bearers of the world that
eventually led to the abominable state of chaos that
we are in today. If he had his way, the skin told me,
every American veteran of the Second World War would
be hanged or even worse. I tried to tell the young lad
that it wasn't their fault. They were lied to and
didn't know about the treacherous pro-Communist Jew in
the White House and could only see Pearl Harbor and
the "evil Axis" powers through a Jewish lens. False
beliefs result in incorrect decisions.

The Incident At Dunkirk

The author next makes the accusation that Hitler made
a mistake and let the British escape at Dunkirk. Of
course, this is understandable given that so many
history books are written by Jewish professors or
pro-Marxist Americans. Recall that this was very early
on in the war, May of 1940, and France and England had
declared war on Germany less than a year earlier. The
Germans were horrified at the thought of fighting
their racial brothers. Race is the foundation of NS
philosophy. Because he was a pro-White humanitarian,
Hitler let the British go at Dunkirk. Ribbentrop's
representative at the Fuhrer's headquarters... left on
record the comment: "Hitler personally intervened to
allow the British to escape. He was convinced that to
destroy their army would be to force them to fight to
the bitter end."
(http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/2WWdunkirk.htm)

Not only was this fact confirmed by a rich German
supporter of Hitler, von Ribbentrop, but also by one
of the alleged possible co-conspirators in the
so-called "July Plot" to assassinate Hitler, Guenther
Blumentritt. Referring to the German Western Offensive
that involved Dunkirk, Blumentritt said of Hitler, "He
then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the
British Empire, of the necessity for its existence,
and of the civilization that Britain had brought into
the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders,
that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by
means that were often harsh, but 'where there is
planing, there are shavings flying'. He compared the
British Empire with the Catholic Church - saying they
were both essential elements of stability in the
world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was
that she should acknowledge Germany's position on the
Continent. The return of Germany's lost colonies would
be desirable but not essential, and he would even
offer to support Britain with troops if she should be
involved in any difficulties anywhere. He remarked
that the colonies were primarily a matter of prestige,
since they could not be held in war, and few Germans
could settle in the tropics. He concluded by saying
that his aim was to make peace with Britain on a basis
that she would regard as compatible with her honour to
accept."
(http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERblumentritt.htm)


Hitler did the right thing at Dunkirk. The Germans in
May of 1940 were still desperately hoping that a
diplomatic peace could be arranged with both Britain
and France. In fact, it was in that month that the
great "Prisoner of Peace", Rudolf Hess, the Reich
Minister and Deputy of the Fuehrer as leader of the
National Socialist Party flew on his ill-received
flight to Scotland to negotiate peace with England. It
is documented that Hitler made at least 6 offers for
peace between Oct. 6, 1939, and July 19, 1940, that
were all rejected by the so-called "flat-footed
bastard of a drunken old cigar-smoking Jew" Winston
Churchill. Note: The comment about Churchill is from
anti-Nazi British propaganda. Any serious devastation
of forces at Dunkirk would have given the British no
choice but to become vindictive and fight the Germans
to the bitter end out of spite and for vengeance.
Unfortunately, Hitler did not know that Churchill, who
had really been the one corrupted by the "rich" (as
detailed by David Irving), was hell bent on destroying
the enemies of the Jews.

Now as everyone agrees that the victors write the
history, it is not at all surprising then that
pro-British and pro-American authors even if they are
not Jewish will continue to slander Hitler and
demonize the "Nazis" for whatever they can to justify
their destruction of Germany and National Socialism.
Even David Irving, who has done a remarkable job at
exposing realities about Germany under Hitler, laces
his writings with pro-British rhetoric and propaganda.
I don't know whether David Irving is Jewish as has
been claimed or not, but I would agree with Carlos
Porter that he is inconsistent on many issues and
appears to be two-faced if not actually schizophrenic.
So in this "Hitler bashing" vein we will also find
scores of accusations, whether true or false, about
how it was Hitler's fault that the Germans lost at
Stalingrad, or whatever.

The fact is that if you get a half dozen generals in
the same room together, you're going to have arguments
about military strategy. And hindsight being 20/20,
today it's obvious what the correct decisions were.
Even if General Erwin Rommel -- who is regarded as
possibly the greatest military genius that ever lived
even in America's most prestigious military colleges
-- were to be present at all military strategy
meetings, that wouldn't guarantee the right decision
nor a successful outcome. In fact, Rommel is still
best known mainly not for his campaign successes but
for his one biggest military blunder -- the supply
problem. But was it really a blunder?
http://www.geocities.com/kkh_khan/SupplyinAfrica.html
More anti-German propaganda? You decide.

Once more I will propose what I consider a valid
question, if not criticism, of the Third Reich. The
Germans proved their superior intelligence once again
during the Second World War with the brilliant
creation of the Messerschmitt 262 (Me 262), the first
jet-powered aircraft to enter combat. However, the
question still remains whether or not Hitler is to
blame for the insistence on its use as a bomber rather
than a fighter. If he had not done so, could the
Germans have put a stop, or at least a huge dent, in
the Allied bombing of so many civilian targets,
thereby saving the lives of hundreds of thousands of
innocent Germans as well as dampening any plot to
assassinate him? You see this was the main reason
several German leaders became hostile to Hitler:
because of the suffering of the German people under
Allied bombing raids. Of course, if the Allies had not
been attacking Germany, the Jewish Bolsheviks would
have been defeated and we wouldn't be talking about it
today, but that's not what happened. I even find
myself criticizing this "what if" question for the
following reason: even if Hitler had requested as many
Me 262's were to be built as designed asap, that
doesn't mean that the same production problems that
plagued the jet engines would have been somehow
miraculously avoided, and such a delay would still
have cost the Germans many civilian casualties as did
happen. Again, hindsight is 20/20 and this game can be
played for hours.

Whom To Believe?

A comment from this writer was the following, "It's
funny how racists swear up and down that Ernst Röhm
was a homosexual, never even entertaining the idea
that Hitler and gang might have concocted that story,
whilst telling nonracial Whites that the Holocaust was
a hoax. If one is thought to be a hoax, or at least an
exaggeration, why can't the other?" This an improper
analogy if one was ever written. Or a strange straw
man, if you prefer. For one thing, "Hitler and gang"
are not the only source of information about Röhm's
homosexuality. A British journalist named Sefton
Delmer is quite vocal about the fact that Röhm was gay
(http://www.heretical.com/miscella/rohm.html)

To answer the general question, Why believe Hitler?
Very simple: because the entire NS movement was based
on telling the truth and doing the right thing. Sure,
Germans are humans and tell little white lies now and
then, but it wasn't policy. When it comes to serious
issues, the National Socialists wrote the teachers
edition on the book about truth and justice. Tell me
the name of even one political party that even comes
close to explaining the true nature of reality as much
as the National Socialists did. The Germans said the
races weren't equal, they aren't. They said the Jews
were a problem, they are. So if they say Röhm was a
homosexual, your best odds are that he was. The
Germans did not frame people, the Jewish secret police
in Soviet Russia did.

The author also goes on to state that, "Röhm preferred
the strategy of mobilizing Whites in other White
countries rather than using the German Army (like
Hitler). Instead of mobilizing the German military,
Röhm would have mobilized the White masses." In the
videotaped interview of former Waffen SS man Hans Von
der Heide by revisionist historian Michael Hoffman,
Herr Von der Heide remarked that he and the other
soldiers thought of their military as the first NATO
or the first United Nations force because they were
fighting shoulder to shoulder with men from nearly all
of the nations in Europe, including France and
Britain. (Here.)

The author also assumes that the masses could be
mobilized from afar by National Socialist propaganda,
but as I mentioned before in my valid criticism of the
Third Reich, this was in most cases impossible because
of the Jewish control or influence in many countries.
This is why the all volunteer Waffen SS from various
nations that were previously not Axis, or even
anti-Axis (like France), only joined AFTER they came
to be ruled by the Germans. Note: Some nations, like
Finland, had first hand knowledge of Jewish Communism
and so immediately signed onto the Axis.

The fact that the so-called Holocaust is a hoax is a
separate issue. It always amazes me how the same
people who want someone to have a fair trial -- the
innocent until proven guilty crowd -- have no qualms
with throwing out Aristotle's scientific method when
it comes to accusations of mass murder against the
"Nazis." When one examines the exterminationist
theories of the Holocaust, it's quite obvious they
don't hold water. Here were a bunch of dead people at
the end of the war and the Jews, Communists, and
criminals claimed the "Nazis" killed them in various
ways. The scientific method would demand that it's not
up to the disbelievers to prove the Germans didn't
kill them intentionally (proving a negative), but it's
up to the proponents of the accusation to prove that
their deaths could not have been caused by anything
else. That is, the deaths were not caused by diseases
or lack of food and water, but a deliberate plan of
extermination. This they can not prove because it's
simply not true. Rather, most assume the Germans are
guilty of murder -- while actually they were only
guilty of throwing out the Jews.

To continue a little bit longer on the Holohoax which
is an extremely important issue -- an American doctor,
whose name escapes me right now, volunteered for the
Red Cross and visited Buchenwald at the end of the war
when people were dying at the rate of 500 per day. He
testified at the 1985 Zundel trial in Canada (video
title The Great Holocaust Trial, available here
http://www.revisionisthistory.org) that the deaths he
saw were not due to deliberate extermination but
disease and starvation. Further, Ditlieb Felderer
remarked in his interview with Hoffman that the
letters from the commanders at Meidenek concentration
camp said things such as, "We are all dying here!
Didn't you get my order for Zyklon-B? People are dying
here!" And what he meant was that the typhus epidemic
was raging in the camp and everyone, including the
German guards, were dying and needed the gas for
fumigating beds, clothing, luggage, etc. to
exterminate lice.

Politics and History

As an example of how easy it is to blast leadership
for incompetence, let's look at America for a minute.
So the Founding Fathers in their infinite wisdom made
it a requirement that the President of the United
States be at least thirty five years old. This is in
fact a very good idea as men who are younger, although
they are not as naive and do not feel as invincible as
when they were teenagers, still aren't mature enough
yet, or have the necessary experience in life even in
their twenties, to handle their obligation to the
people as President of the United States. Some might
say that we should have similar arguments, or perhaps
detailed requirements, on who is allowed to post
articles on the internet. Nevertheless, however
brilliant these men were, they ignored the sagely
advice of Ben Franklin when he was railing about the
Jews and the need to keep them out of America
entirely. Now should we then say that many of these
men (Jefferson, Hamilton, et al) were therefore
incompetent because we have the evidence today of all
the destruction to our society that the Jews have
wrought? That's pretty unfair in my opinion. As is
bashing Hitler.

The author also bashes Hitler saying he wasn't a great
orator and was too feminine in "The Triumph of the
Will." First off, it was a documentary of the Party
celebrating an anniversary. It was not intended as
propagandist rhetoric to persuade anyone of the
righteousness of National Socialism. It was party
about the Party for christsakes. Hitler was a great
orator, no one with any grasp of history will deny
that. He was persuasive, as the Jews like to say, but
what they also say is he lied about Jews, which is a
lie. The reason that he was such a great orator wasn't
practice, it was because he saw the world clearly and
had the passion and courage to stand up for his race.
Many of us who have this same comprehension of reality
and the nerve might also be great orators, but most
will not. I have given more than one pro-White lecture
in rooms packed full of people, and I've also been
accosted by those loser ARA folks, but I can't hold a
candle to Hitler, Goebbels, or our own Commander
Rockwell. The feminine remark was tasteless in my
opinion as was the "stupid little mustache" comment.
Here's a man, Adolf Hitler, who loved and died for his
people and only wanted the best for them, and some
pro-White Americans continue to talk nasty about him.
Great.

When it comes to understanding people or what's
important as far as politics or political propaganda,
most Americans are like virgins trying to write a sex
manual. But the National Socialists were not. They
were pros. The real experts, not at all like the
charlatan "experts" which our media is so fond of
trotting out to further Jewish agendas. As Commander
Rockwell said, people who've suffered through all the
American political bullshit and have found their way
to NS theory are the graduate students when it comes
to politics. Personally, I found this to be the case
after I first began my studies years ago. The NS
philosophers I met ran circles around me easily and I
always ended up putting my foot in my mouth and saying
stupid things because I was so ignorant. In fact, I
know one particular elderly gentlemen whom I'll
probably never match in ability to grasp all of the
comprehensive issues National Socialism encompasses
and handles effectively.

Conclusion

Let go of your hate for Adolf Hitler. Maybe visit
http://www.fuhrerbunker.com/ and get a coffee mug.
There is enough blame for the White race's plight to
go around. Further, if you haven't seen the movie "The
Eternal Jew" (Der Ewige Jude) wherein the Jews are
compared to rats, you might like it.

National Socialism contains many strong messages to
attract the masses. It contains emotional truths
concerning love for one's family that tug at the
heartstrings and are life affirming. It is the cure
for the lack of vision and hope that have lead to
despair, drugs, anti-social behavior and suicide that
plague White youth today. The message of Whites
running their own country and not letting the Jews
have their way is more important today than any other
issue as American lemmings continue to march to the
beat of Jewish drums advocating war against Islam.
Just because a message promotes love your own race, as
National Socialism does, doesn't mean that it promotes
a weak philosophy of loving your enemies, or letting
the Jews skate.

As Ernst Zundel said, the people need a rallying point
for their cause. That person was Adolf Hitler and his
National Socialism, but more importantly, it still can
be and should be for those of us who still carry his
message. To chime in with Jews and Marxists in Hitler
or NS bashing is to make our message more difficult to
believe. We don't have to always see eye to eye, but
we should always fight back to back. I'll give der
Fuehrer the last words -- this is taken from a speech
Hitler made in 1941 when the invasion of Russia was
about to take place: "When this, the biggest front
line in history, now begins its advance it does so not
just to provide the means of ending for all time this
great war, or to defend those countries currently
concerned, but for the salvation of our entire
European civilization and culture. German soldiers!
You are thus entering upon a harsh and demanding
fight-because the fate of Europe, the future of the
German Reich, the existence of our nation now rest on
your hands alone. May the Lord God help us all in this
struggle."

Amen and Heil Hitler!

Sieg Heil!

MAX HADDEN

[END]

*******************************************************

BOOKS FOR SALE:

AVAILABLE THROUGH THE COMMUNITY NEWS LIBRARY:

* RICHARD ODORFER - THE SOUL OF GERMANY - HARD COVER
WITH GOLD IMPRINT - $30.00 (INCLUDING SHIPPING)

* UDO WALENDY - FORGED WAR CRIMES MALIGN THE GERMAN
NATION - $12.00 (INCLUDING SHIPPING)

* UDO WALENDY - TRUTH FOR GERMANY - SOFT COVER -
$17.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)

* CHRISTINE B. MILLER - REALITY CHECK - SOFT COVER -
$10.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)

* WALTER F. MUELLER - REVISIONIST RESOURCE GUIDE -
$8.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)

* ERNST ZUNDEL - SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT - LETTERS
FROM CELL #7 - SOFT COVER - $6.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)

* JOHN RAWLINGS/MICHAEL PASSMORE (GERMAN TRANSLATION
GUENTHER DECKERT) - THE POSTAL HISTORY OF THE
NUEREMBERG RALLIES - SOFT COVER - BLACK/WHITE &
COLOR(COFFEE TABLE SIZE) - $ 35.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)

* SPECIAL EDITION - THE POSTAL HISTORY OF THE
NUREMBERG RALLIES (THE HOFFMANN RALLY CARDS) - SOFT
COVER - COLOR - $ 12.00 (SHIPPING INCLUDED)
*******************************************************

Walter F. Mueller
"The truth is back in business"

The "Patriot Letter" is a free news service of
Community News, a monthly publication with a
circulation of 20,000. To subscribe to Community News
please e-mail for more information.

To be removed from this e-mail list, reply with
"unsubscribe".

What's wrong with National Socialism? Bush - Nazi Link Confirmed