|
Captain
Eric May
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 3:04 AM
Subject: Ghost Troop & the Battle of Baghdad (April 5-7, 2003)
Dear Operation Truth:
My compliments to you for the fine work I've just seen at your
website, which was referred to me by one of my Ghost Troops.
Ghost Troop is the cyberunit, comprised of former military
professionals and interested patriots, dedicated to the same
mission you are: We dig into the real information concerning
the war and publish the truth, as well as we are able to
construct it.
Our initial area of interest was the cover-up of the Battle of
Baghdad, which I was able to pick up on the basis of my
experience as a Soviet-media expert (US Army, Military
Intelligence, DLI-trained, Russian-fluent) and my background as
a Public Affairs Officer (75th Reserve Division General Staff).
The story, as you know, has been suppressed by the US media and
CentCom Public Affairs, but was finally admitted (although
without acknowledgement of casualties) June 29, 2004 -- fifteen
months after the battle!
Below I will give the MSNBC acknowledgement and hyperlink; below
that I will give my essay, published, ironically enough, by Al-Jazeerah.info
in May, 2004.
Best regards, and all wishes for your continued success,
Eric H. May
CPT, MI, USA
CO, Ghost Troop, 3/7 Cybercav+
(Mission of Conscience)
First item: the Battle of Baghdad admitted on NBC, with an
analysis by pro-Ghost Troop journalist Amy Rice.
Battle of Baghdad, April 5-7, 2003
Most of us haven’t don’t
even know that there was a Battle of Baghdad in the first month
of the Iraq war, when we reached Saddam’s capital. Since this
is the biggest of the media’s Iraq War lies for Bush, it’s time
to learn about it.
Think back now the “crazy”
claim by the Iraqi Information Minister, whom our media labeled
a ridiculous “Baghdad Bob.” On April 5, 2003, he made the claim
from Baghdad that there was a fierce fight going on between US
and Iraqi forces at the Baghdad International Airport and that
the Iraqis were inflicting heavy casualties on our soldiers and
Marines. That’s about the last thing you will remember about
the battle, because that’s when Bush told the media to pull the
plug on the truth and start lying. Within hours the media began
to feed us a story about Private Jessica Lynch as a distraction,
and stopped reporting the US attempt to take Baghdad, clearly
the biggest story of the war. They didn’t return the cameras to
Baghdad until April 9, after the fighting was over, when they
broadcast the US Army pulling down the statue of Saddam Hussein.
The biggest story of the
war became a non-event when the truth of the matter is that it
was simply too bloody an event to report. If we had known that
things were getting tough, we might have had second thoughts –
and the Bush media is not going to let us think for ourselves.
They haven’t cared about the Constitution or journalistic ethics
from the beginning; what they have cared about is boosting the
war for their big bosses and Bush, public be damned!
The truth has finally
sneaked into an obscure part of the media: In the summer of
2004, Defense Paul Wolfowitz teased the media for being too
frightened of the mess Iraq has become to leave their bunkers
and go out and get more bogus stories about what a success Iraq
is! That was the last straw, and the media (for once) showed
some spunk. On June 29, 2004, on the MSNBC Chris Mathews Show,
Hardball, (Andrea Mitchell substitute host), the media
finally admitted that there had been a Battle of Baghdad.
Ms. Mitchell interviewed
David Zucchino, the Los Angeles Times reporter who was present
at the battle with the 3rd Infantry Division about
his book “Thunder Run,” which gives a watered-down version of
the three-day battle.
ANDREA
MITCHELL: “You write very dramatically in this terrific book,
‘Thunder Run,” David, about the assault on Baghdad. It‘s not as
we saw it in real time on television, is it? There was a much
grittier story on the ground.”
DAVID ZUCCHINO:
“No, not at all. I think the impression that came from those
three days of combat was that the Iraqis rolled over, that there
wasn‘t much of a fight and the American forces just rolled into
the city. And it was anything but that. There was just some
fierce, savage fighting. There were thousands of, you know,
Iraqis and Jordanians and Syrians who stood and fought from a
series of bunkers and ditches. They inflicted casualties. They
caused a lot of problems for the armored columns. And this was
never reported … but it really was not an easy victory at all.”
[Full transcript at
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5343985]
Everything the media told you from April 5, 2003 to June 29,
2004 was just a Bush media lie. The media has become Benedict
Arnold, serving King George.
Estimating the true number of US dead:
Now that we’ve established
that there was a Battle of Baghdad, described by someone
who was there as “three days of combat,” marked by “fierce,
savage fighting,” what was the death toll among US
Forces? Just how many US soldiers and Marines do you think had
to die to take a city the size of Los Angeles from “thousands
of Iraqis and Jordanians and Syrians who stood and fought from a
series of bunkers and ditches
Before you take a guess,
bear in mind that in any military operation, the defender
has a considerable advantage – and that advantage is greatest
when he is defending a city. OK, now factor in the average
deaths per day in the three days before the Battle of Baghdad,
when the Bush media reported thirty-one dead GI’s (or ten per
day).
How much higher was
the number from the Battle of Baghdad?
Before you guess, here’s a professional analysis. A week before
the battle began, by the way, US retired general Barry McCaffrey
estimated that an assault on Baghdad would cost around 3,000 US
casualties:
"We ought to
be able to do it (take Baghdad)," he told the Newsnight Program
on Britain's BBC Television late on Monday. "In the process if
they (the Iraqis) actually fight, and that's one of the
assumptions, clearly it's going to be brutal, dangerous work and
we could take, bluntly, a couple to 3,000 casualties," said
McCaffrey who became one of the most senior ranking members of
the U.S. military following the 1991 war.
Article from March 24, 2003,
http://www.eces.org/articles/000060.php).
Now go ahead and check the
official numbers for the three-day battle [http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/uscasualties2.html].
The Bush media admits a total of thirteen deaths for in
the period of April 5-7, 2003, when the young American soldiers
and Marines fought and died in the Battle of Baghdad. Welcome
to the brave new world of Bush and his media, liars
extraordinaire, and traitors to the American People.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 4:17 AM
Subject: Ghost Troop 9/07 Numeric analysis of embedded 911 code 4
GTFF
Foreword and explanation of analysis:
Top, Ghost Troop, this analysis is for one of our oldest, wisest
members, Ghost Troop Ficklfinger, but it will serve as an example
of how a military intelligence analyst watches the media to pick
up signals put there by their owners, who are part of the War
Cabal. Remember, y'all, this is not a skill I invented; it is a
standard part of MI training, and something y'all spent a few
million to teach me how to do during the Cold War when I was a
media analyst specializing in the Soviet Media, piecing it all
together from Russian broadcasts and publications. I am exhorting
each of you to begin to look for hidden meanings -- numeric are
most conspicuous -- in the US Media, which is nothing more or less
than a red-white-and-blue-painted TASS! CPTMAY
Numeric analysis for GTFF:
Today US Media is saying 999 US dead (that's cultic for 666 --
right?)
Today US Media is saying that there are at least 33 dead Iraqis
since the weekend (33 is the supreme Illuminatist number --
right?)
Today is day 1091 since 911 (1091 drops the "0" and becomes 191,
an anagram for 911 -- right?).
Apropos of my last communication: Russia had "twin" "terrorist"
airline destructions -- right? Israel had "twin" bus bombings
(the first in six months) to get them off the hotseat for having a
Mossad Mole in the Pentagon -- right? Well, today Italy has
sustained "twin" hostage-takings by "terrorists" in the uniforms
of Iraqi National Guardsmen -- right? Remember, GTFF, you're the
one who taught me about the notion of "twinning."
The media, (CNN particularly) is trying to imply that the Russian
school incident is the "Russian 911," and on 9/12 will be
broadcasting an update on the post-911 world (which the War Cabal
has induced); in that update they will state that nuclear terror
is likely. I believe things are well on the way, my friend...
Start looking at the numbers, y'all. Help me keep an eye on the
media, Ghost Troops! I believe that the US media is conveying a
coded message for their megamedia bosses, the War Cabalists. It
may be that they are standing down from their op-plan to carry out
a staged "terror event" before the election to slingshot us into
WWIII, but I'm not counting on it! I think it more likely that
the "yellow journalist" reporters are being allowed to ask some
tough questions, even believe that the truth will be allowed
(imagine that!), but they are mere puppets, and have proved it
since 911, the little "Operation Northwoods" incident that started
this roller coaster to hell called the "Global War on Terror" so
that the public would believe it was something other than a
pre-packaged WWIII.
Continue to charge, Ghost Troop! Charge the White House -- with
treason!!!
CPTMAY, MI, USA
CO, Ghost Troop, 3/7 Cybercav+
MISSION OF CONSCIENCE
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 4:06
AM
Subject: Re: Fw: URGENT 2 Ghost Troop:
Embedded Code broken; next 9/11 on 9/27/2004
Thanks, my friend! Please help me keep
the discussion of the embedded code going as well as you can. It is
really quite simple, and well-established (which is exactly why they
chose to use it). I have discussed it with Masonic people, Jewish
Cabalists and cultists. The more these people heard, the more sure
they were. My police/military intelligence contacts are in the
know, but I fear that they have been corrupted from the top down.
starting with the Bush appointees.
Best regards, and constant gratitude,
CPTMAY
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: URGENT 2 Ghost Troop: Embedded Code broken;
next 9/11 on 9/27/2004
I have refined my original analysis/prediction by fixing a
mistyped number or two. I attach it immediately below. Below
that, you will find another attached email, one that shows that
the FBI issued a March 25, 2004 warning because of a Ghost Troop
prediction made the day before, then tried to cover it up as
"unspecified, uncorroborate foreign intelligence." The incident
we predicted happened within five hours of our prediction time,
and within 30 miles of our prediction location. Best regards, Capt.
May
GHOST TROOP, all-important that you
forward to all contacts, worldwide!
The email extract below was written
by Army Intelligence officer, Captain Eric H. May, on a mission
of conscience, in obedience to his oath to defend the US
Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. The
recipients are expert members or associates of Ghost Troop, a
group of former military and concerned citizens who have been
successfully picking apart flaws in the cover-up of 911 and the
Middle Eastern War since April 5, 2003. Indeed, before founding
Ghost Troop, Capt. May began working on the prospect of an
attack on the Houston Petrochemical area six months before
the FBI put out its summer, 2003 warnings, by publishing an
op-ed analysis of the attack scenario in the Houston Chronicle,
Feb. 23, 2003. (it is one of five Houston Chronicle war essays
by Capt. May at
http://www.geocities.com/onlythecaptain/pub.htm).
Since his initial analysis of the
prospects of a Houston/Pasadena strike, Capt. May has worked
extensively in many areas military intelligence and media
analysis, but Ghost Troop only returned to Houston/Pasadena
target analysis after the Madrid bombings of 3/11/2004. They
were very interested in the numeric oddity that there were 911
days between 911/2001 and 311/2004 – and that the media were not
reporting it. It was at this point that Capt. May changed his
view of the 911 event, which he had previously believe to be a
foreign terror event, and came to believe that it was a staged
event, under orders by the Bush White House, intended to start
the war in Iraq (and the Middle East at large). This was, after
all, the goal that Bush and the Neocons had the day they came to
office – but simply had no excuse to enact. For confirmation of
this view, refer to the same site of his five war essays, and
read his July 8, 2003 op-ed, in which he quotes General Wesley
Clark’s comments, who expressed the same view on CNN Crossfire,
June 25, 2003. For an example of the US Government’s
willingness to do this in the past (1962, vs. Cuba), refer to
the ABC News report on Operation Northwoods (http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html)
Using basic numerological ciphering
techniques, Capt. May and his associates, Ghost Troop (you can
find them under the search phrase, Ghost Troop) alerted
the FBI, Homeland Security Agency and many Houston-area police
departments that there would be a terror event against a
Houston-area petrochemical target on 3/31/2004. After four
conversations with three FBI agents, Ghost Troop was threatened
with prosecution if it did not desist from its predictions. In
response, Capt. May called several Houston-area media outlets,
most importantly news radio station KTRH, which in turn called
the National FBI. At this point the FBI issued a warning,
carried in national media, on 3/25/2004 (http://www.command-post.org/nk/2_archives/011140.html).
They changed the Ghost Troop prediction by saying that there
were “unspecified, uncorroborated, foreign reports” that
Al-Qaeda was intending a refinery strike to interrupt the US
elections, just as they had done in Madrid on 311.
The strike, contrived by the Bush
White House, occurred in Texas City (30 miles from Houston) on
3/30/2004; the Capt. May/Ghost Troop prediction had been
accurate to within one day. Although the FBI assured worried
Americans that the event was not intentional, the world oil
markets believed Capt. May and Ghost Troop, and gasoline futures
reached their highest level in history the next day. The news
of a terror strike (and its prediction) became a major point of
anxiety in the annual OPEC conference, according to Forbes
Magazine (http://www.forbes.com/newswire/2004/03/31/rtr1318047.html).
The international markets clearly thought the FBI story was a
lie – and it was.
In an August 16 email
(below) Capt. May explains to Ghost Troop why they were off-date
by twenty-four hours in the email extract below, and makes a
frightening prediction that the next 911 will occur on 9/27/2004
– the 1111th day after 911, and completely in keeping
with the methodology of the time-schedule of the makers of 911
itself, and 311 in Madrid. Please forward this email, with its
analysis of the embedded code and its prediction of a 9/27
staged terror event, to all friends and family, and to all local
police agencies and fire departments. The more people who are
aware of the methodology of the faked terror events there are,
the less able the Bush White House will be to carry them out.
From: Eric May
>To: Neworld Order , lindalee3565@aol.com
>CC: snipeunblue@aol.com, John Spooner , wndbear@aol.com,
>Thomas Buyea , Adelaide Institute
>, jimmykilpatrick@educationnews.org,
>liteworks201@aol.com, lizsallen@aol.com, lunstroth@uh.edu,
nhixon@uh.edu,
>palast@gregpalast.com, RADICAL PRESS
>Subject: Cryptoanalysis the next Al-CIA-Duh strike against the
US
>Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
>
> >We're either closer to a geopolitical adjustment (i.e.,
reducing
>our (sinking) Middle Eastern footprint), or just that much
closer to 911
>(the sequel), which I've been predicting as 9/27 (i.e., 9/9,
i.e., 9=9=18;
>i.e., 1=8 = 9). Again, 9/27 will be the 1111st day since 911
(which was 11
>years from the announcement of the New World Order by King
George XLI).
>
>I'm hoping and praying that the folks who were scared of the
War Conspiracy
>are more scared of the War Catastrophe nowadays -- but I'm not
betting on
>it. Believe me, Boy George (King George XLIII) has a hard-on
for the
>numerics of September 27, 2004.
>
>Now to the matters numeric for y'all to chew on. First, a
rundown on the
>"elevens":
>
>3/11 (2004): Madrid Al-CIA-Duh bombings, intended to send Spain
to the
>right but achieving the opposite effect.
>
>5/11 (2004): Beheading of Nick Berg (manifestly bogus and
post-dated to
>achieve the date) by Al-CIA-Duh.
>
>7/11 (2004): End of seven-year term (initiated 7/11/97 of
George Tenet
>(not his real name, but the name in Latin means "George
Holds/Controls").
>Also the Sunday on which the two parties announced on Sunday
morning
>networks shows that Al-CIA-Duh was preparing another strike,
"most likely
>before or after the elections, as the did in Madrid."
>
>8/11 (2004): CIA releases information that the next Al-CIA-Duh
attack will entail “political assassinations.” This is the Bush
Boyz way of threatening the many politicians, military and media
who have become aware of the Al-CIA-Duh hoax. “If you tell,
we’ll kill you and say it was Arab Terrorist!” is the gist of
the 8/11 release.
>
>9/11: The granddaddy number: 9/11, 1990 is the day King George
XLI
>announced the New World Order, as we were preparing to attack
Iraq in
>Kuwait (whither we had enticed them by promising that little
prize for
>service rendered on behalf of Uncle Sam when Iraq fought a war
against Iran
>-- yep, it was a set-up, just like Saddam said). ELEVEN years
later -- to
>the day -- it is the day of the domestic facet of the NWO.
Nowadays all
>the media whores delight in saying "the post-911 world/reality"
(meaning
>the police state/paranoid reality, requiring that the US
dominate the world
>just to be safe in the world).
>
>>Bonus date: 6/11 (2004) when they buried Ronnie Reagan and
Bush made his
>cryptic "western star rising" eulogy -- 1002 days after 911.
The numbers
>were beautiful on that one: 911/2001, with the 911 "flipping"
to 611 while
>2001 (the year) reversed to 1002 (the ordinal since 911). In
summary,
>911/2001 = 611/1002; that one took real manipulation, boyz, and
I'm sure
>Ronnie wasn't present in mind when the SS (as in Secret
Service) physicians
>and agents terminated his term of years in time for the event
to take
>place. He was an actor to the end, after, all, and his last act
was to lie
>in state so that the New World Order could have it's black mass
of a
>funeral -- a rallying signal for the last phase.
>
>Oh, and a last things: I know now why the Texas City
petrochemical
>explosion/fire took place on March 30 (2004), and must now
admit that I was
>off by a day in my 3/31 prediction: 3/30 is the only day in the
year with
>the supreme cult number (of the Masons, inter alios) of 33
(11x3). It is,
>incidentally, also the date in 1981 when Bush buddy Hinkley
tried to kill
>Ronnie Reagan -- as a Hinkley family member had dinner with
Neal Bush --
>whose marriage date was two or three years before on..., you
guessed it,
>3/30. I've got a feeling that Neal is heavy into the crime and
>assassinations end of the family biz, y'all...
>
>OK, XO, Top, y'all can broadcast it as far and wide as you want
-- all to
>support my prediction that we're headed for 911, part 2 on 9/27
or 11/11,
>depending on whether the Bones Boyz want to bother with the
election (in
>which case they'll wait to see which King wins the contest) and
make their
>move on 11/11. If they've brokered a deal, dependent on a
crisis before
>the election (and I'm leaning that way in my prediction), then
they'll go
>with 9/27. That date is fresher, anyhow, and has a lot more
numerological
>subtlety in it.
POSTSCRIPT: Two
days after this email extract, there was an “unexplainable”
event involving a petrochemical explosion, with a 1,000-foot
pillar of fire, at Moss Bluff, Texas. Moss Bluff, like Texas
City, is around 30 miles from Houston, Texas. In Capt.
May/Ghost Troop analysis, the significance of this event was to
give the final signal for the follow-up to the foiled 3/30 event
in Texas City. The date of the Moss Bluff “pillar of fire”
was 8/19; 8+1=9, therefore 9/9; and 9+9 = 18; 1+8 = 9, one of
the 911 "signature numbers, along with 11. (Hyperlink to the
event news:
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/news/081904_APnatl_gasexplosion.html).
The Moss Bluff explosion started out on 8/19, and was then
"amplified" the next day until it reached its full 1,000 pillar
of fire climax.
These numbers are
the signature of the embedded code. Any Mason will be able to
identify the Illuminatist numerology. IMPORTANT: Just as 3/30,
the date of the Texas City event, was 930 days from 911 (9+3=12,
the number of completion or perfection to Masons), the 8/19 Moss
Bluff event is 39 (93(0) reversed) from the target date of 9/27,
the 1111th day in the 911 sequence. Texas City is
approximately 30 miles southeast of Houston/Pasadena; Moss Bluff
is approximately 30 miles northeast of Houston/Pasadena; the
next strike, 9/27, will be in Houston/Pasadena. Just as the
media struck itself in New York to be able to deny the 911
event, and Washington, D.C., struck itself to be able to do the
same, George W. Bush will strike his adopted hometown to remove
suspicion of the event from himself. I predict casualties in
the tens to hundreds of thousands, and an immediate willingness
of the US public to stop investigating Bush and follow his
insane plan to initiate the Third World War.
What to do?
Please forward this email
to all, or print and mail it to people with whom you don’t
communicate via email. Remember, once the secret of the
embedded code is out, the war conspiracy collapses. If they had
the power to effect their plans without stealth, outright, they
wouldn’t be using the code in the first place!
Down with the traitor and tyrant
Bush! Long live the United States of America!
Captain Eric H. May, MI, USA
Commander, Ghost Troop,
3/7 Cybercavalry+
Mission of Conscience
Second email to Mr. Toben: GHOST TROOP WARNED FBI OF
3/30 ATTACK ON 3/24 -- THEN FBI COVERED IT UP FOR THE WAR CABAL:
Dear GTBuyea, here's the initial prediction, which set the
national alert going when I delivered it to KTRH radio
(News, Clear Channel, Houston) on March 24, 2004. As you'll
note from the list of four citations (three on the 3/30
strike on Texas City; one about the Moss Bluff (8/19) strike
starting the "countdown" to 9/27 (the 1111th day since 911),
my email preceeds the national alert by a day. 'Nuff said?
CPTMAY
I reattach the four reference articles; the email confirming
Ghost Troop's initiation of the alert (and the FBI's lie to
cover it up) is below:
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:42:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Eric May
Subject: ALERT: 3/31 Al Qaida attack: Houston, Texas
by CPTMAY/G TP, 3/7 CAV+Cyber
CPTMAYSEZ 2 GHOST TROOP & POLICE POSSE:
Yo y'all, I know it's a grim headline, but I've
been predicting a strike against Houston on
March 31, 2004 since the 311 bombings -- and
have been in constant communications with
various police, media, civic organizations.
They are all responding in classic bureaucratic
fashion: Everyone is covering his ass or
following orders to cover the institution's
ass. All my principle contacts are going crazy
since the film Independence Day aired on Fox
Network yesterday, because we've been studying
the theory that the film was used as a study of
an empowerment scenario, embedded media and
genocidal war. It also contains a strike
against Houston by a "fighter pilot" president.
Back in early March a Pasadena Police Sergeant
was asking me to give him a specific target for
my predicted strike against the Houston/Pasadena
petrochemicals district. The first thing to
leap into my mind was "the San Jacinto
Monument," our Texas version of the Washington
Memorial. The sarge whistled under his breath
and asked me if I was a Mason, and when I said
no he simply said: "There's a lot of cult stuff
built into the San Jacinto Monument -- I wish
you hadn't said that."
On 311 "Al Qaeda Terrror" blew up the Madrid
bombings. Within a day Fox Network was saying
that "Al Qaeda Terror" had announced that it was
90% ready for a "Black Wind of Death" attack on
the United States. (This was exactly the type
of attack mentioned in my Houston Chronicle
op-ed about a Houston Refinery District attack.
On 321 "Al Qaeda Terror" vowed revenge for the
"targeted killing" of Sheik Yassin, and within a
day (322) Fox Network had explained that "Al
Qaeda Terror" has a suitcase nuke that it got
from Russia -- a plausible enough scenario
(supposed to be), and was vowing revenge against
the United States.
On 331 "Al Qaeda Terror" will place a suitcase
nuke in the Refinery District, and it won't
matter if it's placed near to the San Jacinto
Monument, because when the Refinery District
goes up like an atomic fireball the monument
will be vaporized along with everything else
within miles.
Watch Independence Day, the movie we of Ghost
Troop have been cracking as part of the EMBEDDED
MEDIA. Before ten minutes you'll be as
frightened as the gentlemen below -- on of whom
is a Marine Officer, the other of whom is an
Army Officer. Y'all think it's for real yet,
boyz and girlz??? Yo,
Culmo80@aol.com
-- you think this is getting to be URGENT and
CRITICAL yet, boy? LOL, what the hell -- be a
good Christian by fighting the infowar to inform
the public, y'all! I'm getting a little tired
of all the "can't do a thing" attitude of the
sheep -- weren't y'all trained to be rams?
Last thing, apropos of the pending attack on
Houston/Pasadena: The movie "The Alamo" is
being marketed already as how "a few had to die
so that all could live free." The movie
involves the Texan defeat of the Mexicans at San
Jacinto Battleground, where they hollered
"Remember the Alamo!" It was a slaughter, by
the by -- a complete massacre of the Mexicans,
who were clubbed to death in the shallow waters
that surround the place -- I know it well, since
I worked out there for years and in fact married
Mrs. May there. Who'd have thought that things
would come to this... Well, the movie will be
released in April, just in time to push the
public into a war of revenge against the "Al
Qaida Terror" that did this to Houston at San
Jacinto!
I can hear the trailers working up after it all
goes down...
"Remember Houston! Remember San Jacinto!
Remember the Alamo!"
...which all together add up to one summary:
EXTERMINATE THE TERRORISTS!!!
By the way, what you're saying and I'm saying is
what Alex Jones and other folks playing the
scenario through were saying up in the March 20
protest against the war in Crawford. They
mentioned the Illuminati, too.
Y'all have all made a believer out of me.
CPTMAY
PS: I've place the op-ed of Houston "Black Wind
of Death" attack -- from over a year ago --
above the two letters.
February 23, 2003 “Don’t’ laugh at duct tape; it
saves lives”
Houston
Chronicle Outlook, February 23, 2003
As we
poise to attack Iraq, our military leaders worry
that our forces will have to survive and
function on the “dirty battlefield” of chemical
and biological contaminants. They are preparing
for that worst-case scenario, which is the best
thing to do. Here at home, on the other hand,
I’m afraid that too many of us are expecting the
best-case scenario – that we will be untouched
by the war – which is the worst thing to do. We
are negligent in our civil defense.
Take the
duct tape squabble as an example. Earlier this
month, the Bush administration heightened the
nation’s alert status, and gave the specific
advice that citizens have emergency supplies,
including duct tape and plastic sheeting, in the
event of possible chemical or biological attacks
on American soil. Senate Minority Leader Tom
Daschle, more concerned with the war for the
presidency in 2004 than the war for Iraq in
2003, mocked the administration’s ineptitude,
saying that it would have to do better than duct
tape to protect the American people.
Daschle is
wrong. One of the first tricks of survival in a
contaminated environment is to seal up a room
with duct tape and plastic, breathing the ample
inside air until any wind-borne toxins outside
have dissipated.
Dismissing
Daschle’s argument, I went down to a local
hardware store to get supplies a few days ago,
only to learn that he had already influenced
many shoppers. Duct tape and plastic sheets in
hand, I asked the checkout clerk fomr the back
of the line how many people were stocking up on
the items. “Not many,” she replied, “duct tape
won’t work.” I explained to her why duct tape
would work. To most of the shoppers in
earshot, this seemed to be welcome news, and
several of them went back to the shelves for
supplies. The hardware store made a handful of
dollars in profit, and a handful of people made
purchases that could save their lives.
Now is the
time for all wise people to come to the aid of…
themselves. Civil defense, like all forms of
self-defense, is an unpleasant concept. It
demands that we accept our own stated reason for
going to war: There are evil people in the
world who hate and seek to harm us with weapons
of mass destruction. We are in a war with
terrorists – and terrorists are in a war with
us. Not just with our service personnel,
intelligence agencies and police forces; not
just with citizens of our political and
financial capitals, but with all of us.
Terrorists deal in terrifying deeds. The know
that a thousand civilian casualties in America
are more devastating to the nation’s morale than
a thousand U.S. military casualties in Iraq, and
may well be easier to inflict.
The
Houston area is unquestionably among the top
homeland targets for agents of evil. Consider:
·
We’re the
nation’s fourth most populous city.
·
We’re the
home of the Johnson Space Center.
·
We are the
declared home town of the Bush family.
·
We have
the nation’s largest chemical district.
·
Our
climate enhances the lethality of a chemical
attack.
When I was
a general staff officer we routinely envisioned
worst-case scenarios to test our preparedness.
Let’s use one for ourselves:
Early one
morning there is a massive explosion in the
chemical district along our ship channel.
Lethal gases, similar to the ones released in
the catastrophe of Bhopal, India, erupt into the
atmosphere. An early morning inversion
temperature gradient – our climatic norm – keeps
the toxic cloud on the ground, while gentle
southeasterly breezes – again, our norm – blow
it northwest inside Loop 610, where our
population is most dense. It may reach beyond
that. In any case, the toxins would not
dissipate until the afternoon, when our
atmospheric conditions usually cause ground
pollution to rise.
If anyone
thinks that my scenario may give the bad guys
ideas they haven’t already thought of, think
again. Terrorists like the ones who
simultaneously hijacked four planes and turned
them into missiles are smart enough to think of
blowing up toxic factories in populous areas.
They are constantly thinking of the bad things
they can do to us – and we’d better start
thinking about them ourselves.
May, a
Houston-based writer, is a former Army Chemical
Corps instructor of nuclear, biological and
chemical warfare.
Reader
Reply:
Re:
Eric May
's Feb. 23 Outlook article, "A Dangerous
Truth / Don't laugh at duct tape; it saves
lives": May
should throw out the fear
propaganda. Any elected government official who
promotes fear ought to be voted out of office
immediately. Americans should fear nothing
except the tyranny taking place in our
government.
John
Leonard, Houston
gail.heyn@kucinich.us wrote:
Will this issue be discussed in today's debate, coming up
in minutes?
Gail
CPTMAY replies 2 Mr. Burks:
Dear Mr. Burks,
Thanks for taking the trouble to examine
the Chronicle archives -- and thanks for the info that my op-eds
have been removed from file. This is quite a feat on the
Chronicle's part, because I have written around 50 op-eds for them
in the last 12 years, beginning in 1991, when I received a bit of
acclaim hereabouts for standing down a street gang that had been
robbing my inner-city high school students at gunpoint. That
little bit of recklessness on my part earned me the opportunity to
write "real-life" op-eds about education issues. Most of my
stuff, as a matter of fact, is about education, local politics and
culture; I've only written five geopolitical pieces in the
Chronicle, all referenced at my "Ghost Troop" website report at
www.geocities.com/onlythecaptain/ . Should you wish to look
at that site's premise (that there was a bloody Battle of Baghdad
last year, while US Public Affairs broadcast the Jessica Lynch
"rescue" as a distraction), you'll see that my work on the
embedded code is a secondary mission. I was drawn into the
infowar out of a simple desire to see the truth about my comrades'
sacrifice come to light. Incidentally, fifteen months after the
battle, the truth of things in that bloody April 5-7 weekend of
2003 in Baghdad did come to (slight) light: The media wanted to
punish Dep. Sec. Def. Wolfowitz for castigating their inability to
find positive Iraq stories, so they dangled the possibility of
revealing the truth that Baghdad was covered up -- and by
implication that many (nay, all) the important facts affecting
America are covered up. Here's the citation, in brief.
[Extract from an article by Amy
S. Rice, of Journalists Against Bush (JAB)]
The truth has finally sneaked
into an obscure part of the media: In the summer of 2004, Defense
Paul Wolfowitz teased the media for being too frightened of the
mess Iraq has become to leave their bunkers and go out and get
more bogus stories about what a success Iraq is! That was the
last straw, and the media (for once) showed some spunk. On June
29, 2004, on the MSNBC Chris Mathews Show, Hardball,
(Andrea Mitchell substitute host), the media finally admitted that
there had been a Battle of Baghdad.
Ms. Mitchell interviewed David
Zucchino, the Los Angeles Times reporter who was present at the
battle with the 3rd Infantry Division about his book
“Thunder Run,” which gives a watered-down version of the three-day
battle.
ANDREA
MITCHELL: “You write very dramatically in this terrific book,
‘Thunder Run,” David, about the assault on Baghdad. It‘s not as
we saw it in real time on television, is it? There was a much
grittier story on the ground.”
DAVID
ZUCCHINO: “No, not at all. I think the impression that came from
those three days of combat was that the Iraqis rolled over, that
there wasn‘t much of a fight and the American forces just rolled
into the city. And it was anything but that. There was just some
fierce, savage fighting. There were thousands of, you know,
Iraqis and Jordanians and Syrians who stood and fought from a
series of bunkers and ditches. They inflicted casualties. They
caused a lot of problems for the armored columns. And this was
never reported … but it really was not an easy victory at all.”
[Full transcript at
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5343985]
Everything the media told you from April 5, 2003 to June 29, 2004
was just a Bush media lie. The media has become Benedict Arnold,
serving King George.
Back to Mr. Burk... Please spread the
word that the media is completely complicit in the scenario I and
my associates in Ghost Troop call "Fourth Reich / Third World
War." The embedded code is genuine, and not even particularly
complicated. As you can see at my website intro, my own
background is military intelligence / languages / media, so I'm no
natural code-breaker..., but this code isn't deep at all. The
fact that it's so apparent (once explained) is due to the
necessity of having something simple to coordinate the many levels
of the federal apparatus necessary to enact "terror events."
I truly believe we are in a race against
time, and hope that you and your associates can help me and Ghost
Troop to spread the word. We really did break up (or at any rate,
alter) the 3/30 event, and we can preclude a 9/27 event. It only
takes enough circulation of the code that the code itself is
broken -- I seriously doubt they can organize and program a
back-up. Once the public comes to see the 911 code for what it
is, they will begin to put the chronology of events into that
context, and the War Cabal, already beginning to show cracks
(e.g., the Mossad Mole in the Pentagon story) will collapse
utterly. Should we fail to bring enough scrutiny fast enough,
they will go ahead with the event, insuring that the catastrophe
is sufficient to bring the public into line with their aims. I
expect that they mean to use 9/27, the 1111th day since 911, to
fully mobilize the public, and grant King George the power to wage
nuclear/strategic war.
With best regards, CPTMAY
|
