Happy to be back in Australia: Fredrick Töben reflects
24 July 2003
Dear Associates and Supporters
I'm back in Australia but not yet back home, and after a rather extended trip through North America, Europe and Southern Africa - made possible by a generous sponsor - I am happy to say I am somewhat refreshed and ready to do more work on the vexed issue of free speech-Holocaust Revisionism. The trip's outline is at: awww.adelaideinstitute.org
I am happy to announce that from Poland Adelaide Institute has a new European Associate: Dr Dariusz Ratajczak: Email: firstname.lastname@example.org the former Opole University academic who lost his job because of publishing a little book wherein he addressed some difficult questions - naturally about the Holocaust.
From memory I recall that in January 1999 Poland passed anti-Revisionist laws, then in April 1999 joined NATO. In June the first casualty of that new law was already there, namely Dr Dariusz Ratajczak.
That subsequent former east European countries followed the same pattern indicated the strength of the Holocaust lobby. It was indeed true that Europe is an occupied continent, occupied by ZOG!
I personally resisted such conclusion, and still do instinctively now, but facts on the ground are facts that have proven themselves to be physical impediments for Revisionist Historians, and anyone who dares to quest for free speech, who dares to reject the Anglo-American-Zionist occupational ideology of international corporate and predatory capitalism.
I certainly cannot subscribe to the theory that all the world's prevailing ills can be sheeted home to the so-called 'Zionist-Jewish lobby' because that would not explain vital issues on which this lobby is itself divided and attempts to silence dissent by assassinating its own renegades.
However, I go a long way towards confirming that in Australia it was indeed the Zionist lobby that has attempted to silence our work, and that this lobby has had some considerable success in our courts to silence both Mrs Olga Scully and myself. The costs alone have been horrendous for the likes of us who have dared to stand up against the dictum "for fear of the Jews". Fortunately we have nothing to lose, and I am reminded what Mel Gibson's father, Hutton Gibson, said to me when I praised his courage in speaking out against the Anti-Revisionists, and affirming that the whole 'Holocaust' is indeed a racket. He said that he has nothing the Jews can take from him, and so he had nothing to fear; and this at 84!
Currently the thrust of the Anglo-American-Zionist force is into the Middle East, there to continue creating facts on the ground. After Iraq, it will be Iran, as the groundwork for this onslaught has already been set.
But nothing is certain in life, not even that might is right, though the visible hurt and devastation of this primitive ideology can be seen wherever humans are active. An excessive focus on this aspect of life would make us unbalanced and turn us into victims of life, something I instinctively resist. Our task is to focus on powers that oppress others, for example the Zionists who oppress the Palestinians, etc.
Further, to get that personal balance on things I, wherever I can, take an early morning swim, come what may, during summer and winter. Recently in South Africa though, I must confess that I remained in the water for only a few seconds - the water's temperature was just above zero centigrade, and I made that dash into the water up to my neck, then out again in a flash. I didn't realize that I was still quite fast on my feet!
Still, after such exercise I feel that nothing can upset me because I have challenged my own self, or as the Germans say, 'den inneren Schweinehund zu überwinden'. After all, you have to doubt your own sanity as you enter the cold water and the sensation is not pleasant, but your body continues to adapt to the temperature changes that occur rather quickly.
In this sense of continuing to challenge the obstacles that life inevitably provides for us to surmount, let's see what the remainder of 2003 will bring. Sometimes I, too, am gloomy about whether we are getting anywhere, whether the Holocaust ideology will be defeated in our time.
Then, as I reflect on how far the Revisionist attitude has infiltrated the world, then I smile to myself because I recognise how fragile the world of the anti-Revisionists is. They are on the run and they fear Revisionists. Reflect again on the legal bill that Olga Scully and I will be presented with, at least $150, 000 each. Imagine, that's how fragile their world view is: they need to persecute through legal prosecution.
Think of Ernst Zündel in the Toronto prison called a Detention Centre! When I think of all that, then I know we are sane and they are mad! And I qualify this statement immediately because I usually do not use such generalist language. But think of it: Ernst Zündel merely expressed his point-of-view on historical matters. He refuses to comply and submit to accepting the historical orthodoxy currently prevailing in Germany - a fact that upsets those who control that historical world view. They feared him so much in Canada that a Canadian government spy agency has become complicit in his planned murder per mail-bomb. What is his crime? Ernst Zündel does not hate the National Socialist Adolf Hitler, and he does not cringe when using that name, as many wretched Germans do who have lost their personal dignity by swallowing the victors' imposed world view.
And finally, Ernst Zündel considers himself to be a good patriot, a nationalist. But horrors, oh horrors, how can anyone in this modern age still have a love for one's ethnicity-country, as Ernst has for his beloved Germany? Well, multiculturalism teaches us that all ethnic groups should be loved and respected by us. It seems to me that Ernst is merely implementing what the United Nation is advocating in its declaration of universal rights. But then I forget, even Amnesty International will not consider Ernst Zündel a prisoner of conscience. Why not? Ernst loves his ethnicity, his Germany! And the Germans lost the so-called Second World War! Any German who dares forget that, whether in business, politics or in the cultural domain, will be sanctioned.
I wonder what it is with the Germans, what values so rile those that hate Germans, that causes this kind of world hatred for anything German.
Then again, I forget that many in the world love German virtues, as much as Ernst Zündel loves and attempts to embody them in his public and private life.
Why is that a crime, punishable by imprisonment where the Anglo-American-Zionist Axis of Evil rules? Now Israel has officially sent its Mossad hit-squads into friendly countries, there to eliminate any critic of Israel. German politician and critic of Israel and friend of the Palestinians, Möllemann, appears to be the first victim of Mossad's cowardly work. Then British Dr Kelly may have been the next because anyone who does not support the Anglo-American-Zionist destruction in the Middle East is an enemy of Israel that is targeted to be eliminated.
Well, that's not nice because I certainly view Israel as a European colonial outpost in the Middle East that practises political Zionist-Apartheid-Racism, much to the detriment of its original Semitic Palestinian settlers.
Herewith the first page of the August newsletter. Any suggestions for anything to be included?
All the best.
ERNST ZÜNDEL - PRISON MEMOIRS, FEBRUARY 5 - 19, 2003
Dear Paul (Fromm),
You asked me to write something about what happened to me. I find it difficult because I am in a state of denial about it all. It simply has been one grotesquely unfair and very emotionally disturbing, highly unpleasant experience from the word "go", especially since we were living in the belief that we had done everything by the book, everything we could have possibly been doing and, and in our lawyer's opinion, the overwhelmed immigration service checking into thousands, tens of thousands in fact, of terrorists in the United States simply had not come around to look at the file of two pension-aged Whites setting up residence. All this came to an abrupt end when a virtual posse of police cruisers, paddy wagons, etc., materialized in my driveway in Tennessee at about 11:00 a.m., February 5, 2003.
One of my handymen was helping me frame some of my water colors, oils and line drawings which I intended to hang on the walls of our soon-to-be opened Art Gallery that very afternoon. We were to open in two weeks.
I was dressed in my work outfit, blue jeans, mountain hiking boots, colorful carpenter's suspenders, casual flannel shirt, etc. I inquired what brought them there as they surrounded me menacingly. They told me to put my hands on the hood on a truck in the driveway and said that they were Immigration Service Enforcement officers there to address me and take me into custody because I had failed to keep a hearing date. I was stunned as was Ingrid (Rimland, my wife).
They had no arrest warrant. I asked to call my attorney. The request was denied. Ingrid joined us. She, too, was told no calls to the attorney were allowed. I asked Ingrid to go into the house for my passport and jacket. I took no papers or identification like driver's license, social security number, etc. and absolutely no addresses with me, not to compromise my friends, because by then I knew I was being deported - I thought to Germany.
Within minutes, I was in handcuffs and leg irons in a prison van, escorted in a police convoy down our mountain road, past our art gallery, into our little town where we did our shopping, onto highway I-40 to Knoxville, where I was processed, finger printed, photographed and where one Immigration officer, not directly involved in my case, had his wall decorated with a 2 x 4-foot large Israeli flag. Needless to say, I found this somewhat of an odd wall decoration in a U.S. Immigration Office! I wondered to myself if they had Nazi swastika flags on the walls of the INS in the 1930s or 1940s.
I was given some documents to sign which were lying on the table of one of the bureaucrats when I came in. They had yellow post-it notes and one clearly said in someone's handwriting "add today's date here".
A Polaroid photo was taken of me against the wall of some garage, part of a hollow block-type building with a very noisy, malfunctioning air conditioner being checked by a technician. This photo was then trimmed and later on stapled onto a document of which I was given, I believe, a copy. The photo clearly shows the outfit I wore the moment I was arrested.
I was then put again into a prison van in handcuffs and leg irons and driven for approximately 1 1/4 to 1 ½ hours through heavy traffic from Knoxville via Maryville past the airport to the Blount County Jail, a building I had pointed out to Ingrid several times in the previous two years saying, "This is where they will take me when they come to arrest me", prophetic words! How did I know? I don't know.
I was unloaded at the Blount County Jail, a cold unfriendly place whose staff had a nasty attitude, the likes of which I had never encountered in any other prison facility in Canada or in Europe before.
The processing took over four hours. Then I finally was allowed a brief call to Ingrid which did not go through right away as it was 9:45 p.m. I was kept in an ice-cold, all concrete holding cell - even the seats and floors were concrete - until well after midnight. I had had nothing to eat or drink since about 12:30 at the INS office in Knoxville. The medication I was on which I brought with me to jail was denied to me. The doctor, I was told, was to decide if I was allowed it or not. Since [the pills] were all non-chemical based, they were denied me. As a result, my blood pressure began to act up. I was told by the nurses to whom I was taken in handcuffs and ankle irons, that it was dangerously high.
I was housed in a two-man cell, 24-hour lockup, only allowed a brief shower after two to three days and a short call to Ingrid, I don't remember when.
My cell mate was a chemical engineer, a manic depressive who hallucinated, talked to unseen people all day and jumped up and down and out of bed all night long, hollering orders to persons unseen, thinking he was in charge of the CIA and talking loudly to "the president" on his make-believe telephone. He annoyed the guards repeatedly in the middle of the night by frequently using the in-cell intercom. He smelled something awful, obviously not having showered in weeks.
Finally, the guards came en force, six or seven of them, and told me to get off my top bunk, grab my mattress and sheets and get out of the cell, motioning me out into the hallway. The next thing I heard was hollering, screaming and kicking and punching and blood squirting against the wall as my crazy cell mate was dragged on one leg across the floor into a different area of the prison. I saw him a few days later on my way to sick bay with bruises, all black and blue over his eyes and head as they led him past me from the doctor's office.
Later on, I was told by my U.S. attorney that he had engaged a well-known Knoxville attorney (Public Defender) who had filed a $6 million lawsuit against the Blount County Jail and the sheriffs and guards.
I was put into a two-man cell with a gentle, soft-spoken 65-year-old barber who had tried to shoot his mother. He was kind and helpful to me and taught me the ropes of U.S. prison life. I was now briefly with the general population, half Black, Mexican and Indian, the rest being Whites mainly from the Smoky Mountain area.
There was hardly a blond person amongst them, all were dark-haired to jet black. Most were hardened criminals, murderers, bank robbers, car thieves. Most were repeat offenders. Many had 25- to 30-year sentences. There was anger, rage and frustration in that place that was palpable. Guards were cold, abrupt and unfriendly.
Contact with Ingrid [my wife] was very unpredictable because one of the phones was broken and the young Black inmates were hogging the phones for calls of 45 minutes to an hour.
One Sunday, I heard dogs barking. The next thing I saw, we were all ordered into our cells while black-uniformed SWAT teams went systematically from cell to cell, threw us on the floor face down, hand cuffed, arms twisted behind our back. They searched our pockets, beds and plastic bins. They dragged us outside the cells like sacks of potatoes while helmeted, visored, New World Order-type cops hollered commands at us. The dogs dripping saliva from their snapping jaws were mainly Dobermans and German Shepherds and were kept on chain leashes two feet away from our bodies and faces.
Young, pretty women in skin-tight uniforms and tightly-fitting flak jackets, all black in color, kept climbing over the men who were curled up, face down, shaking, crying, tears streaming down some of their faces, frightened out of their wits. The women filmed these hapless prisoners with mini camcorders close up, laughing and joking, having themselves a ball. For whom were these videos taken?
During this amazing performance, the water in the toilets was turned off and after we were ordered back into our cells, many felt the urge to poop and soon, and the place stank to high Heaven! After about two hours, the water was turned on and everything returned to normal.
I was there on two weekends, and this terrorizing of the prisoners happened on both weekends. I was lucky to miss it the last weekend because my American attorney had come to see me and I was in the visitor meeting area of the prison. He had found out by the grapevine that I was going to be deported from the USA, even though we had a habeas corpus motion filed with the court and it was already before the Cincinnati Sixth Circuit Court at that time.
A few nights later, I was awakened by pounding on my cell door at 2:30 a.m. and told to get ready. By 4:30 a.m., the guards finally came to get me for "processing" out. I was given a shower, ice cold, and changed back into my civilian clothing. It was a national holiday, "President's Day" [Monday, February 17]. They could not let me have the U.S. $400 I had brought with me to prison because of the holiday. Thus, I was taken to the Knoxville Airport without a single cent in my pocket. We boarded a plane to Atlanta [Georgia] shortly after 7:00 a.m., landing there after 9:00 a.m. I was not told where they were deporting me to but saw the airline counter we went to, and it said, "Buffalo, New York". Then, I realized they were shipping me to Canada, not to Germany.
I had had no opportunity to let Ingrid know where I was and what was happening to me. We arrived in Buffalo at 11:30 a.m. in a bad snowstorm. There I was told I was banned from the U.S. two times ten years, which meant Ingrid would be 87, and I would be 84 years-old before I might have my first chance to see her again.
I was taken across the Canadian border, kept in a locked room, at Canadian Immigration offices at the Peace Bridge. There was lots of gesticulation and loud talking. The end result was I was taken back across the U.S.
border, still in a snowstorm. We seemed to slide and slither for hours until I finally spotted a sign saying Attica, New York, Maximum Security Prison. Luckily, the van turned into Batavia and we finally arrived there at dusk.
It was way out in a wind-blown farming area. It was a flat-roofed facility, surrounded by high barbed-wire fences and search lights with a small guard hut and a barrier like in the Dr. Zhivago film. A huge six-foot guard, dressed in a Russian-type fur hat and a dark green greatcoat, came to check papers and cargo, and soon I was processed into the Batavia Detention Center. It was a seemingly new, very clean, well-organized facility.
Especially the Immigration Detention area I was kept in was state of the art, efficient and clean. The guards were friendly. There were a dozen phones on the wall, a pencil sharpener which worked and paper and envelopes cheerfully handed to me by a big, blond guard who could have stepped out of an SS recruiting poster a few moments before.
Unfortunately, I was only there for not quite two days before I was taken back to Canada, this time for good. Again, I was deported via the Peace Bridge at Fort Erie on February 19, 2003.
I was interrogated for about seven or eight hours off and on. I was allowed to call Ingrid, my lawyer, friends, and within two hours, some Scottish friends [from Hamilton, Ontario] had come to see me, and brought me some much-needed money. They left. I was arrested and taken to Thorold, the Niagara Region Detention Center. It was an old facility and primitive in comparison to Batavia.
This was to be my home away from home for the next three months, interrupted by numerous detention hearings...
[to be continued?]
New Zealand's Anti-Revisionist Lobby at it again and will not leave Joel Hayward alone
Holocaust scholar at heart of 'book burning' row
New Zealand Herald, 22 July 2003
A "book burning" scandal has erupted at Canterbury University over an article on controversial Holocaust scholar Joel Hayward. The decision to recall and destroy copies of the history department's journal History Now - and dump editor Ian Campbell - is dividing the academic community.
Canterbury lecturer Thomas Fudge, who wrote the offending article, has resigned in disgust and plans to leave at the end of the year. Dr Fudge said he could not remain at a university that suppressed academic freedom. "It made me a hypocrite trying to teach my students to think critically and ask the tough questions - all of the academic values that universities are about - and here my department was saying, effectively, we're going to burn books."
The article revisits the storm that surrounded the 1993 masters thesis of former Canterbury student Joel Hayward, which questioned the validity of Holocaust history. Dr Fudge, who lectures on medieval religious dissent and witch-hunting, explored what for Dr Hayward became a career-ending controversy. He revealed in the article that Dr Hayward had been harassed and received death threats against his children. Dr Hayward suffered an emotional breakdown and left his teaching post at Massey University in June last year. He now cannot get a job.
'The Fate of Joel Hayward in New Zealand Hands: From Holocaust Historian to Holocaust?' played on the title of his thesis, The Fate of Jews in German Hands. The article appeared on May 6. Next morning, Professor Campbell was asked to appear before his editorial committee and history department head Peter Hempenstall.
Professor Campbell said he was effectively pushed: "The fact is that board disapproved of my editorial decision and, as a result, I couldn't continue as editor." An embargo was slapped on the journal and 500 copies recalled. Staff was later advised that copies of the offending journal had been destroyed on the authority of Professor Hempenstall. Another May edition of History Now was printed without the Fudge article and an editorial discussing truth and martyrdom.
On May 14, Dr Fudge defended his article at a special meeting of history department academics, calling the censorship "unconscionable". Last week, he confirmed to his students that he had resigned.
Professor Hempenstall declined to speak, saying the matter had now become an employment issue between the university and Dr Fudge.
Mr Kerry Bolton, New Zealand Associate of Adelaide Institute Speaks Up
22 July 2003
Dear Dr Fudge
Congratulations on your courageous stand for freedom of enquiry. If such freedom does not exist at university then what is the point of the institution existing - simply to uphold the status quo?
Surely history by nature is revisionist? Perhaps Canterbury also still believes that the Germans bayoneted Belgian babies during WWI, and that they were guilty at Katyn?
I have read Dr Hayward's thesis, as well as the Working Party report on it.
A forced retraction and apology is
surely as of much value as a forced confession. If I recall correctly, Galileo's retraction was of the same nature.
If it was not for revisionist historians tales, about gas chambers existing within Germany, and of making soap from corpses would still be in vogue.
As for the disgraceful behaviour of the University towards Hayward and now yourself, surely you are aware that in much of the world academics are jailed, fined, beaten and even murdered. Faurisson in France had his academic career ended and has been subjected to numerous court proceedings. He was beaten to near death several years ago. In the same country Prof. Duprat died in a car explosion. James Keegstra and Paul Fromm in Canada had their teaching careers ended.
In Australia Dr Toben has been legally obliged to censor his own website, and was entrapped and imprisoned on a visit to Germany...
I would like to ask you whether your article will be consigned to the memory hole, or whether it is to be available?
K R Bolton
Office of the Vice Chancellor
Christchurch, New Zealand
Dear Dr Sharp
Having read Dr Hayward's MA thesis, the Working Party Report and Dr Hayward's addendum, I have to wonder about your university, considering the totalitarian decision to destroy an edition of History Now which apparently champions freedom of enquiry.
If such freedom is not tolerated at a university, then what precisely is the point of the institution existing? - simply to uphold the status quo, or in this instance, a dogma that relies at least as much on religious faith as historical research.
Surely history by nature is revisionist? Or perhaps your University still upholds the World War I propaganda legends of Germans bayoneting Belgian babies? If it was not for revisionist researchers, and this is a point conceded by Raul Hilberg, myths such as the existence of gas chambers within all German concentration camps, the making of soap from human fat and German responsibility for Katyn would still be taught unquestioningly.
I find it paradoxical - or is the word hypocritical? - that orthodoxy relegating the German people per se (e.g. Daniel Goldhagen) to the status of mass murderers is encouraged and applauded but any questioning of this Blood Libel is met with religious type fanaticism.
Your University has the stench of the Inquisition about it.
K R Bolton
22 July 03
Canterbury University has the stench of the inquisition about it. What kind of supposed institution of higher learning is it that destroys the magazine published by its History Department because of the inclusion of an article defending freedom of enquiry?
Dr Thomas Fudge has courage in writing an article questioning the bigots who pilloried Dr Hayward when he wrote an MA thesis that sought to examine Holocaust revisionist literature in an objective manner. Dr Fudge is perhaps a little naïve however. Violence, imprisonment and censorship are the standard means by which valid questions on the Holocaust are suppressed. Dr Hayward was merely one of many academics who have been persecuted by zealots who have made the Holocaust into a religious and political rather than an historical matter.
If freedom of enquiry is not tolerated at a university, then what precisely is the purpose of the institution? Simply to uphold the status quo? In that case, perhaps the University establishment still perpetuates the World War I myth of Germans bayoneting Belgian babies? If it were not for revisionist researchers, legends such as the existence of gas chambers in all German camps, the making of soap from human fat and German responsibility for Katyn would still be in vogue. Or perhaps they are at Canterbury?
K R Bolton
Who is Mahmoud Abbas?
Posted: July 22, 2003
By Joseph Farah, © 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
To his great credit, President Bush has not made one mistake his predecessor made repeatedly - inviting the father of modern-day terrorism, Yasser Arafat, to the White House. But President Bush is doing the next worst thing this week - inviting Arafat's puppet, Mahmoud Abbas, to meet with him in Washington.
Abbas, or Abu Mazen as he is also known, is perceived by some, including the president, as a "moderate" hope for peace.
I do not agree with this assessment. In fact, Abbas is a fraud. Abbas is evil in his own right. Abbas is a deceiver. Abbas is an anti-Semite and a hater. And I can prove it.
Many have heard the story of how Abbas, as a doctoral candidate at Moscow's Oriental College in 1982, wrote a thesis suggesting far fewer than 6 million Jews were killed in the Holocaust. But, Abbas did much more than that. He actually accused the Jews of conspiring with Adolph Hitler to annihilate European Jewry. He accused the Jews of deliberately inflating the numbers of those killed in concentration camps to pave the way for a Jewish state. He may have been one of the first to equate Zionism with Nazism.
"The Zionist movement's stake in inflating the number of murdered in the war was aimed at ensuring great gains," he wrote, adding that "this led to confirm the number [6 million] to establish it in world opinion, and, by so doing, to arouse more pangs of conscience and sympathy for Zionism in general."
In the version of his doctoral paper later published under the title, The Other Side: The Secret Relationship Between Nazism and the Zionist Movement, Abbas denied the German use of gas chambers and suggested the total number of Jews killed was fewer than 1 million.
But perhaps the most horrifying and revolting charge by Abbas is that Zionists were complicit with the Nazis in the murder of Jews.
"The Zionist movement led a broad campaign of incitement against the Jews living under Nazi rule, in order to arouse the government's hatred of them, to fuel vengeance against them, and to expand the mass extermination," Abbas wrote.
Abbas has danced around this treatise for many years. He has attempted to put it in perspective. He has tried to explain what he really meant when he denied 6 million Jews were murdered. But he has never publicly retracted his accusation that Zionists collaborated with the Nazis in the extermination of Jews.
Despite this incredible charge, Abbas still enjoys the reputation of a "moderate." He still enjoys the reputation of a "pragmatist." He still enjoys the reputation of a "statesman" - perhaps even an indispensable statesman.
Nothing could be further from the truth. Abbas was one of the principal planners of the Munich Olympics terrorist attack. He was the guy who wrote the checks and embraced the operatives as they headed off to one of the most sensational terrorist attacks of its time in 1972. More recently he said the "intifada" - the violent uprising by Arabs against Israel that has raged since the fall of 2000 - "must continue." He has never renounced armed struggle as a legitimate means of achieving his precious Palestinian state.
In the Soviet school in which he was educated, Abbas served a useful purpose. It's called the dialectic.
What's the dialectic? An idea or event
generates its opposite, leading to a reconciliation of opposites, or a synthesis. That is how progress is achieved - through conflict, whether it's real conflict or phony conflict manufactured by two or more conspirators.
When you see a schism develop between Arafat and Hamas, or Arafat and Abbas, understand what is at work. There is no schism. It's not real. They are play-acting. They are reading off the same page. It's the dialectic at work. The fix is in.
Abbas is not a champion of peace. He is a master of artful conflict. President Bush's advisers do not serve him well if they have not explained this simple con game.
Fredrick Töben comments
Imagine, here is a man defending Israel's terrorism against the Palestinians, then complains about Mahmoud Abbas because Abbas took the typical 'left-wing' position against Zionism, a somewhat dated dichotomy. Further, what riles this fellow, Joseph Farah, is the fact that Abbas refuses to accept the obligatory 'Holocaust' story, something even the single judge in my 17 September 2002 Federal Court of Australia judgment refused to get involved in. From memory I think she said that the trial was not about whether the 'Holocaust' happened or not, but rather whether the material complained of could offend in all probability.
This point is not new because years ago Professor Arthur Butz stated that any kind of 'Holocaust' material coming from Revisionists would indeed be offensive, and a law that is specifically designed to catch such mindset is patently unjust, and Butz concluded that we are all guilty of upsetting people with our work. That's the nature of the whole intellec-
tual exercise where under normal circumstances truth would protect anyone from legal consequences, and where historical matters are not the subject of court actions. But we are living in times that are out of joint!
In our Australian pioneer work against Zionist-Jewish oppression, it cost the Zionist $150 000+ each to place a gag order on Mrs Olga Scully and me. We must be saying something right, especially when telling the truth, and searching for the truth, will not protect us from such action. All very sad for Australia's judicial system that such a judgment has been made. The judges involved are themselves enslaved, and I have a suspicion that they know it, in fact perhaps in part enjoy it. After all, looking at their own blind spots is not an enterprise some judges indulge in freely.
Joseph Farah's comment about 'dialectic' is elementary because he does not specify whether he is using the Hegelian or the perverted Marxist dialectic method. He may protest all he likes but the Hegelian dialectic is a universal that cannot be discussed away.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 4:00 PM
Subject: Fw: White Male 911 Victims Mocked
How many of you have witnessed a self-loathing White man named Michael Moore on television peddling a racist book called Stupid White Men? No, it wasn't on a racist TV show, or on a program warning against racial stereotypes. Not Black Entertainment TV or from Al Sharpton or Louis Farrakhan's pulpit. It wasn't on the ADL's website or in millionaire Morris Dees' Southern Poverty Law Center fundraising letters. It was on every single major network morning program, within earshot of all of America's little children. Why would a smirking news anchor like Katie Couric giggle while interviewing this man instead of identifying him as a self-hating White man promoting false stereotypes? It is because he is a shabbos goy, and Couric's Jewish boss wanted his anti-White message put forth? He is shielded by his skin color while delivering a message directly to America which the Jews' media has been indirectly attempting to do for the last 50 years.
I read an article this morning about Mr. Moore which would have been the top story on all news stations had the target of the vicious attack been a non-White or a Jew. I thought "Oh, he's gone too far this time." But since the Whitebashing in this country gets worse by the month, not one U.S. newspaper decided it was politically incorrect enough to mention. You be the judge as to whether or not this would have been on your news had the target of the attack been a non-White. Note the author of the piece is a black man with a Muslim name. Read his words:
"What we did not expect was to feel so enraged at one point that we almost walked out. It was when Moore went into a rant about how the passengers on the planes on 11 September were scaredy-cats because they were mostly white. If the passengers had included black men, he claimed, those killers, with their puny bodies and unimpressive small knives, would have been crushed by the dudes, who as we all know take no disrespect from anybody."
The article goes on to talk about black-on-black crime, naming victims and describing the horror black communities endure because of their young angry black males. The author thought that mocking the deceased White men on board the hijacked plane was an insult to...blacks! That is how bad it is, people. That is how little value White lives have to the enemy, and unfortunately even to our own people. I thought the author was outraged because of the racial stereotyping or disrespect to the victims of 911. But no, Michael Moore saying that allegedly manly and courageous black men would have prevented the hijacking of the plane (while White men cringed) is not an insult to us. We don't matter. The media has elevated this man to star status and wants our children to internalize his message of hatred towards their fathers, grandfathers, sons, brothers, husbands, uncles, friends. Katie Couric and company do not care to defend the honor of the White people on that plane, but they would certainly ruin the career of any White man who merely implied 1/10th of what this self-loather said.
I am outraged that I didn't read about this, as a headline, in the hysterical "anti" racist U.S. media. I had to read it in a foreign newspaper, sold to the public as an insult to negroes. Just beautiful. The author ended his column with these words:
"While nice liberals and career anti-racists luxuriate in denial, a community implodes".
Because of the grateful peon that I am, I sent this Negro writer a letter thanking him for letting me in on what people are saying about my people "in polite company."
Here is an excerpt from that letter:
"It may be true that whites seem cowardly at the moment, evidenced by the fact that they won't defend themselves even when victimized. I call it 'Battered White Syndrome'. After all we have been beaten down with anti-white, racist propaganda for 40 years. But you are right. A community is imploding. The white community and if the racial harassment and double standards continue, whites may wake up, and when whites wake up, they do it in a big way."
ANGRY WHITE FEMALE
Adelaide Institute Reports, 27 July 2003
Horst Mahler challenges the anti-Revisionists/Exterminationists theory of the 'Holocaust'
On 25 July 2003, the German media ran articles about Horst Mahler not receiving permission to leave Germany and travel to Poland, there to visit the Auschwitz concentration camp.
Mahler is the foremost 'German Reich' political theoretician in Germany, and he has initiated an action that re-focuses Revisionists' attention on Auschwitz-Birkenau, where 'allegedly' European Jewry was exterminated in homicidal gas chambers.
Mahler uses documentation that purports to reduce the official Auschwitz death figures to just over half a million (510 000), and that of those deaths probably 356 000 were gassed (Jews and non-Jews), not in Krema II but in two farmhouses outside of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration complex.
Brandenburg's interior minister, Jörg Schönbohm, calls this action an "unbelievable provocation", and literally placed Mahler under 'house arrest', i.e. Mahler had to hand in his passport and identity card to the police and is not permitted to leave Germany and travel to Poland.
Together with supporters, Mahler had planned to visit Auschwitz on 30 July 2003, there to make a public statement using the documentation on which he bases his political action.
It is an article from leading Spiegel editor, Fritjof Meyer, 'Die Zahl der Opfer von Auschwitz. Neue Erkenntnisse durch Archivfunde', which appeared in the renowned publication Osteuropa, 5/2002, p 631 ff. The former president of the German Bundestag, Prof Dr Rita Süßmuth is patron of this publication.
Mahler advises that in an 'action against judicial notice of the Holocaust' various citizens of the German Reich had copied the article, sent it to a number of well known public figures, then turned themselves in to State Prosecutor Neumann in Berlin, and elsewhere, for having contravened German law that pro-
hibits anyone questioning details of the
'Holocaust' (§ 130 Abs. 3 and 4 StGB).
To date in Berlin three actions have been stopped for lack of evidence:
Edgar Forster StA Bochum,06.05.2002, 33 Js 145/03 A;
Ursula Haverbeck StA Bielefeld, 27. 05.2003, 46 Js 171/03;
Imke Barnstedt StA Berlin, 10.06.03, 81 Js 1564/03.
The public prosecutor's office in Stuttgart refused to begin proceedings, that Günter Deckert initiated, against the Spiegel editor Fritjof Meyer and Prof. Dr. Rita Süßmuth.
Mahler wants to know how it can be explained that publicly the number of Auschwitz victims is 'officially' reduced.
Is this because Fritjof Meyer advises that the camp commandant Rudolf Höß, under torture, came up with an imaginary number because he, Höß, hoped in time it would be realized how such self-incriminating evidence was extracted?
Mahler is appealing the minister's decision.
TROUBLE IN THE HOLY LAND
Jerusalem touted as world's capital: Israel's Peres wants shrines under stewardship of U.N., Annan as mayor
Israeli opposition leader Shimon Peres, a former Israeli prime minister, is proposing Jerusalem be declared the capital of the world as a way of getting around competing Israeli and Arab claims to the city. According to his spokesman, Yoram Dori, the dovish leader of Israel's opposition Labor Party suggested putting the important religious shrines in Jerusalem under United Nations stewardship. He said the holy sites in Jerusalem's walled Old City could be declared a 'world capital.':
www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33711 © 2003WorldNet Daily.com
Remember this: Resentment v Hatred
"I resent being accused of hatred. Resentment is not hatred it is a natural response to a false accusation. I detest many Jews, and other groups, meaning simply that I do not wish to socialize with them, for the simple reason that they are deliberately obnoxious -they cultivate their obnoxiousness so as to provoke dislike so they can maintain their complaints of victimization so as to play upon the consciences of those that possess such a thing and who are unaware they themselves are the victims of the Jewish game."
Peter Wakefield Sault
27 April 2003
Dog Adolf in Nazi salute
From ALLAN HALL in Berlin
23 July 2003
A racist who trained his dog Adolf to give the Hitler salute outside a school of Asian and Turkish children is facing six months in jail. Roland Tach, 53, was arrested as the black labrador raised its right paw as mums dropped their kids off in Berlin. Giving the salute or praising the Nazi regime in public is forbidden in Germany. But this is believed to be the first time the law has been applied to the owner of an offending animal. Retired factory worker Tach has waged a daily vendetta against the kiddies. He waited by the gates with Adolf to yell racist abuse at them, including: "You're not Aryan. Go home scum." Tach would then command "Adolf - Gruss" and his dog would raise his paw. The Heil Hitler salute was also known as the Hitler Gruss - Hitler greeting - during the 12-year Nazi regime. Last week Tach fired a gas pistol into the air as Adolf obeyed his order. One mum at the school in Lichtenrade said: "We were terrified of him.
"He was so objectionable, calling us and the children all manner of names." Tach could be fined up to £5,000 on top of a six-month prison sentence.
Adelaide Institute comment: The man only ought to be charged for use of indecent language and threatening behaviour, something that is not linked to being a National Socialist or a racist.
©-free 2003 Adelaide Institute