David
Brockschmidt discovers another fraudulent claim from Israel
Come
on Israel, not again! In
Adelaide Institute Newsletter No 180/
3 October
2002
, I exposed the
late Uzile Gal, nee Guthard Glass from
Weimar
,
Germany
, as a fraud.
Gal was not the inventor of the Uzi submachine gun but that Gal copied
it off the Czech MP25, but then sold it as his invention. Now we are
again being deceived by the media about the latest ‘invention’
from
Israel
. The Weekly
Telegraph, No 648, January 2004, reports on the latest Israeli
weapon system invented by Lt Col Amos Golan, a submachine gun that
shoots around corners thereby not exposing the shooter to danger.
As
with Uziel Gal’s earlier invention this Golan invention is based on
a World War Two German invention that the Germans had produced and
used in actual battles during 1943–44. The 90 degree angle barrel
device was attached to the German MP 43/44. This machine gun was later
copied by the Russians in 1947 and later sold to the world as the AK
47, also known as the Kalashnikov. The standard army rifle in the
Israeli Defence Force, the Galil, is nothing but a copy of a copy of
the German MP 44. Shooting around the corner is an old German hat
exactly 60 years old, and to sell that today as an Israeli weapon
system is a bit bent! It seems as if it is necessary not only to think
around corners but also to have the chutzpah to sell this German
invention to British SAS today as Made in
Israel
.
Thinking
around too many corners gives you a crooked mind, and that’s why
Revisionists are straight shooters. I am looking forward to the next
Israeli weapons system to be launched – perhaps a gun that can shoot
in circles?
SAS
issued with guns that shoot around corners
The
SAS has brought a new Israeli weapons system that could revolutionise
its urban warfare and anti-terrorist operations by letting soldiers
fire aimed shots around corners, writes Toby Harnden. According to
Israeli sources, British police forces have also shown great interest
in the “Corner Shot” system, invented by Amos Golan, a retired
lieutenant colonel. The system appears to solve the age-old dilemma of
how a soldier can fire accurately and safely around a corner. Recent
attempts by the French and the FBI involved holding a monitor in one
hand while exposing the other arm to enemy fire. The system can be
fitted to most commonly used pistols. It has a trigger attached by a
cable to the pistol trigger, so that the handgun can be extended
through a doorway while the soldier remains covered by a wall. A small
high-resolution camera and monitor given a full view around the
corner.
Ref.:
1. Jim Thompson Machine Guns. A Pictorial, Tactical and
Practical History, 1989, ISBN 0-87364-535-9
2. Barker, A J German infantry weapons of World War II, 1976
January
23, 2004
FEATURE
Holocaust
denial: the state of play
[So
it's a game for some - tell that to those who have been
arrested
and imprisoned by the Zionists and their helpers - Töben.]
HOLOCAUST
denial decreased in the
United
States
in 2003,
but increased among Arab countries and the Palestinian Authority (PA).
These were two of the findings of Holocaust Denial: A global survey
— 2003, a report released last month by the Wyman Institute for
Holocaust Studies in
Philadelphia
.
The
report attributes the decrease in activity to “ongoing legal
conflicts between the two major US promoters of Holocaust denial —
the Institute for Historical Review and Liberty Lobby founder Willis
Carto”. However, it noted that British Holocaust denier David Irving
spoke in more than 25
US
cities
throughout 2003.
Other
major developments include a visit by former PA Prime Minister Mahmoud
Abbas (Abu Mazen) to the White House. Abbas is the author of The
Other Side: The secret relationship between Nazism and the Zionist
movement, which downplays the atrocity of the Holocaust.
In
October, former Malaysian Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad sparked
international outrage on the eve of his retirement when he alleged
Jews “rule the world by proxy”. But Dr Mahathir conceded in his
speech to the Organisation of Islamic Conference that six million Jews
were murdered by the Nazis. The following is a snapshot of Holocaust
denial around the world in 2003.
AUSTRALIA
ON January 8, Immigration Minister Philip
Ruddock denied David Irving’s request for a visa on account of his
“past and present criminal conduct and past and present general
conduct”.
Irving
was
previously denied entry to
Australia
in 1993 and
1996.
In
June, Melbourne Underground Film Festival director Richard
Wolstencroft came under fire over his decision to screen the 1993
documentary The Search for Truth in History which
features a speech by
Irving
. The
screening was eventually cancelled at the 11th hour.
In
July, the Federal Court upheld a ruling against Adelaide Holocaust
revisionist Dr Fredrick Toben ordering him to remove any material
which refutes the Holocaust or the existence of gas chambers from his
Adelaide Institute website.
In
December, Tasmanian Holocaust denier Olga Scully resumed distributing
anti-Israel and Jewish conspiracy material.
NEW
ZEALAND
THE
controversy over Joel Hayward’s
Canterbury
University
thesis, The
Fate of Jews in German Hands: An historical enquiry into the
development and significance of Holocaust revisionism, entered a
new chapter in 2003 when
Canterbury
lecturer
Thomas A Fudge authored an article titled “The Fate of Joel Hayward
in New Zealand Hands: From Holocaust historian to Holocaust?”
A
1999 investigation concluded that there was no evidence that
Hayward
’s thesis
was motivated by racism or malice.
Fudge’s
article was initially accepted for publication by History Now,
the journal of the Canterbury University History Department, and
printed in its May 6 edition.
However
objections from faculty staff prevented the edition from being
distributed. His article was published by the New Zealand Herald
and other newspapers in July 2003.
PALESTINIAN
AUTHORITY
IN
June, the Palestinian Authority’s official newspaper, Al-Hayat Al-Jadida,
published an article which accused Zionist leaders of conspiring with
Nazis to exterminate anti-Zionist Jews.
On
July 25, former PA prime minister Abu Mazen became the first Holocaust
denier to be invited to the White House. His book, The Other Side:
The secret (relation)ship between Nazism and the Zionist movement,
downplays the number of Jewish victims and accuses Jews of
collaborating with their Nazi oppressors.
He wrote: “Many scholars have debated the
figure of six million and reached stunning conclusions — fixing the
number of Jewish victims at only a few hundred thousand.”
In
August, Hamas newspaper Al-Risala published an article by senior Hamas
official Dr Abd Al-Aziz Al-Rantisi, in which he wrote: “It is no
longer a secret that the Zionists were behind the Nazis’ murder of
many Jews, and agreed to it, with the aim of intimidating them and
forcing them to immigrate to
Palestine
.”
In
September, Hafez Barghouti, editor-in-chief of the PA’s official
newspaper, Al-Hayat Al-Jadida — which has published numerous
articles denying the Holocaust — was part of a delegation of 10
journalists from the Middle East to meet British Prime Minister Tony
Blair.
UNITED
STATES
THE
impact of the Institute for Historical Review (IHR), the leading
Holocaust denial organisation in the
United
States
, was
diminished in 2003 due to ongoing financial problems, devoting much of
its resources to assisting imprisoned Canadian Holocaust denier Ernst
Zundel.
Consequently,
the IHR was unable to publish its Journal of Historical Review.
The last issue was published in late 2002.
In
April 2003, the Barnes Review announced that it is the
exclusive distributor for Jewish Supremacism, a new book by
Holocaust denier and former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke.
British
Holocaust denier David Irving spoke to audiences in numerous cities.
However, speeches scheduled in
Louisville
and
Kentucky
were
cancelled due to “outside pressure”.
Irving
returned to
the
US
in August
to host his annual “Real History USA Convention”.
CANADA
ON February 5, Ernst Zündel, 63, was arrested
in
Tennessee
,
USA
, and
deported to
Canada
. Zündel, a
German citizen, lived in
Canada
for more
than 40 years but was unable to obtain Canadian citizenship, because
he was regarded as a national security threat.
Zündel
was convicted by a Canadian human rights tribunal in January 2001 of
promoting hatred against Jews through his website, which was
subsequently dismantled. It was reposted on a different server later
in the year.
In
November, Amnesty International denied requests from the IHR to adopt
Zündel as a “prisoner of conscience”. The organisation said it
did not “adopt persons who are imprisoned for ‘hate speech’”.
On
August 8, the Canadian Jewish Congress petitioned the Canadian Radio,
Television and Telecommunications Commission, urging rejection of a
request to include the Arab television network Al-Jazeera — which
includes Holocaust-denial programs — among the satellite television
stations available to Canadian viewers.
EGYPT
AN article in the November 17 issue of the
Egyptian weekly newspaper Al-Usbu reported the opening of a manuscript
museum in the newly-renovated
Alexandria
library.
The article defended a decision to include an early Arabic translation
of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion in the exhibit,
positioned next to a Torah scroll. Museum director Dr Yousef Ziedan
said: “In reality, an analysis of samples from the purported gas
chambers has proven that these were sterilization chambers, without a
sufficient quantity of cyanide to kill.”
UNITED
ARAB EMIRATES
THE
Zayed Centre for Co-ordination and Follow-up — a now-defunct Arab
League-sponsored think tank that promoted Holocaust denial — was at
the centre of controversy in 2003 after Harvard Divinity School
graduate student Rachel Fish launched a campaign against the
university’s acceptance of a $US2.5-million gift from President
Zayed to endow a chair in Islamic studies.
AUSTRIA
AUSTRIAN Holocaust denier Wolfgang Fröhlich
was arrested in
Vienna
on June 21
in connection with the publication of his 368-page manuscript, The
Gas Chamber Lie.
BELGIUM
ON
September 9, Belgian Holocaust denier Siegfried Verbeke was sentenced
to a suspended prison term of one year and deprived of his civil
rights for 10 years following his conviction for distributing
pamphlets denying the Holocaust.
FRANCE
ON July 7, the European Court of Human Rights
rejected an appeal by French philosopher Roger Garaudy against his
conviction for Holocaust denial. Garaudy’s original conviction was
based on passages in his book, The Founding Myths of Israeli
Politics, in which he disputed the existence of gas chambers in
Nazi death camps.
GREAT
BRITAIN
ON
February 18, Cambridge University Union revoked its invitation to
David Irving to take part in its annual Free Speech Debate.
The
Holocaust-denying magazine The Revisionist resumed its print
edition in February. From 2001-2003, it had only been available
online.
ROMANIA
IN response to international criticism, the
Romanian Government issued a statement on June 17 acknowledging that
Romania
“was
guilty of grave war crimes, pogroms, and mass deportation of Romanian
Jews” during World War II. On October 22, President Ion Iliescu
announced the establishment of a national Holocaust Remembrance Day.
SWITZERLAND
ON January 13, Swiss Holocaust denier
Gaston-Armand Amaudruz surrendered to Swiss authorities over his 2000
conviction for violating the law that makes it illegal to “deny,
grossly minimise or seek to justify genocide or other crimes against
humanity”.
Holocaust
denier Albert “Ahmed” Huber said in a July 12 interview that he
now serves as the liaison between European neo-Nazis and Islamic
organisations in
Europe
. “I am
very happy that the right-wing world... understands that the Holocaust
was a big fraud and the European neo-Nazi should join Islamic
organisations to fight
Israel
, the Jews
and
America
,” he told
JTA. The Swiss Ministry of Justice is currently investigating Huber,
following the inclusion of his name on United Nations’ terrorism
lists.
Ex-SS
men on massacre charges
From correspondents in Rome
January
13, 2004
AN
Italian court has indicted three former members of the Nazi SS on
charges of massacring 560 people in the Italian village of Sant'Anna
di Stazzema in 1944, a local news agency reported. The ANSA news
agency said indictments had been issued against Gerhard Sommer, 83,
Alfred Schonenberg, 83, and Ludwig Sonntag, 80, all former members of
an SS Panzergrenadier Division. The court in
La Spezia
, in north-western
Italy
, decided not to proceed with
cases against two other former SS members and asked for further
information on a third, it said.
Judicial
officials in
La Spezia
could not be reached for
information after the ruling was issued late today. The accused were
not in court today, ANSA said. Last year, German prosecutors, who have
also been investigating the case, recommended the prosecution of eight
men. Among those cited was a man referred to only as Gerhard S.
Prosecutors handling the German case could not be reached for comment
tonight.
In
2002, German public television ARD interviewed a Gerhard Sommer from
Hamburg
who admitted being a company
commander in the division, but he had little to say about the
massacre. "I have an absolutely pure conscience, and I don't want
now to know further about these things," Sommer said. In August
1944, about 300 German SS troops surrounded the Tuscan village of
Sant'Anna di Stazzema, which had been flooded with refugees, in what
was supposed to be a hunt for partisans. Instead, they rounded up all
villagers they could find – 80 per cent of whom were women, children
and elderly – and began shooting them, according to witnesses.
Others were herded into basements and enclosed spaces and killed with
hand grenades.
The
Italian trial is scheduled to begin on 20 April, ANSA says.
Want
an Australian PhD?
Sue
Andrews: Sue.Andrews@anu.edu.au
PhD (Women's Studies) Research topic/title: Power, Politics and the
Personal: Creating Memory in
Australian
Holocaust
Museums
and Memorials Research
interests: Feminist interventions in fields of trauma, memory and
culture; gender, embodiment and health/social policy.
http://arts.anu.edu.au/gender/page5.html
Fredrick
Töben sends a Letter to the Editor, which is not published
-----
Original Message -----
From: Adelaide
Institute
To:
letters@scnews.com.au
Sent:
Tuesday,
January 20, 2004
5:41 PM
Subject:
'Holocaust' education is German hatred education
Re
Your 'Photos show war on web' article - Sunshine Coast Daily,
January 19, 2004
'Holocaust'
education is German hatred education
Sixty
years after the event I wonder if the British government will get its
act together and finally prove that which is so dear to its heart,
i.e. that homicidal gassings, that six million Jews were gassed and
that Adolf Hitler was responsible for the extermination-genocide of
European Jewry. Only in this way will the British government continue
to subdue and castrate the German spirit that derivative
individuals fear so much.
Also, only this 'Holocaust' fabrication will continue to
suppress the more virtuous British impulses that opposed WWI and WWII,
from coming to the fore.
It
is no accident that the National Archives has brought these millions
of photographs to a wider audience because the British legal
constraints on truth-telling have grown thin and too obviously
self-serving to last for very much longer. The National Archives
action is the final fling at Germans - but it will fail to
constrain the Teutonic spirit for much longer.
Fudging
documents is nothing new for the British government - as we saw with
Tony Blair's government and those Iraqi elusive WMDs when it fabri-cated
that
Niger
uranium story to help bolster its rationale to initiate an
aggressive-predatory war of resources. The stock-phrases of 'freedom',
'democracy', and against 'dictatorship' begins to sound not only
hollow but also deceptive. It is a classic example of cant, that
quality some celebrate as a virtue. Democracy's own dictatorship
merely sustains class thinking, among other things, that false
consciousness so welcomed by the gullible and the lazy that fear the
creative impulse from exploding anew - as it did prior to the outbreak
of WWII.
Add
to that the fact that the British government still refuses
to release documents surrounding Rudolf Hess's peace Flight to
Scotland
,
we should shift our focus away from the Zionist/Jews and re-focus on
the British archives to find the truth about certain historical
events. What kind of history is it that is locked up for years?
Archive insiders have no doubt done their job to bring the written
record in line with the fabricated facts.
But
we should not stop short of chiding the British. The focus must also
rest on the German government that through the Spiegel
continues to flog the 'Holocaust' horse, as became evident when it
slavishly picked up the British National Archive release of
photographs. Germans went from National Socialism to national
masochism - and 60 years after the event are still there feeling
guilty about something that never happened! That's not only sad or
tragic - that's stupid!
Revisionists
do not fear the release of these millions of images sixty years after
the event because they know that Robert Faurisson's challenge remains
to be fulfilled: show me or draw me Hitler's WMDs! We
shall with some amusement watch the younger generation of interested
individual re-searchers latch on to the images thus released and
search for that elusive proof. It would make anyone who found the
evidence an instant world celebrity. Revisionists recall the
celebrities of the recent past: Jean-Claude Pressac and Charles Provan,
for example, who served the 'Holocaust' lobby well, until their
proofs disintegrated under the firm watchful gaze of Revisionists.
The
fight against superstition (Aberglaube) and for Truth and Reason
continues unabated; the intellectual adventure continues to excite
those who can tolerate such stimulation.
Dr
Fredrick Töben,
Adelaide
Currently
at
Sunshine
Coast
20
January 2004
Kerry
Bolton writes on the German Hohmann affair
Embassy
Federal
Republic
of
Germany
,
90-92
Hobson St
.,
Wellington
,
New
Zealand
.
6
January 2004
Dear
Sir
I have somewhat belatedly read an article from The NZ Herald,
dated Nov. 6 03, entitled “Special forces commander fired over
anti-Semitic speech.” I enclose a copy of the article. The article
concludes with a quote from Paul Spiegel of the Central Council of
Jews, stating that “people abroad can’t understand” how certain
statements could be made from a Government employee and an Opposition
MP.
The statements deal with a speech made by Christian Democrat
Martin Hohmann who described Jews as “a race of perpetrators”.
Apparently Hohmann had stated in a speech in October that Jews had
acted “like a race of perpetrators” during the 1917 Bolshevik
Revolution, and that many had been involved with the Cheka and NKVD.
His party bosses reprimanded Hohmann and historians apparently
dismissed his statement as “amateur rubbish”.
Worst still Brig. Gen. Reinhard Günzel. Commander in chief of
the elite KSK forces and a forty-year veteran was dismissed for
writing a private letter of support to Hohmann.
As a non-German there are certainly things about this I
“can’t understand”, to use Mr Spiegel’s expression.
I can’t understand the statement from your “historians”
who claim that reference to Jewish involvement in Bolshevism and in
particular the terror squads, is “amateur rubbish”. What kind of
historians do you have and what rubbish are they teaching your youth?
It seems that the young are being taught to dishonour their parents
and grandparents, rather than to honour them for their
sacrifices.
As for the alleged Jewish involvement in Bolshevik sadism, the
Jewish role in communism and the Bolshevik Revolution was widely known
by both Gentiles and Jews at the time. Winston Churchill for e.g. in
an article he wrote for the Illustrated Sunday Herald (“Zionism vs.
Bolshevism – a struggle for the soul of the Jewish people”,
Feb.
8, 1920
)
described communism as “a movement among the Jews”, a “world
wide conspiracy… of envious malevolence” “for the overthrow of
civilisation.” In the context of what Hohmann and Guenzel were
condemned for stating, Churchill wrote: “…And the prominent, if
not indeed the principal, part in the [Soviet] system of terrorism…
has been taken by Jews…”
If we follow Churchill’s assertion, starting with the killing
of the Czar and his family, here Jews served as the perpetrators, from
the orders given by Jacob Sverdlov, first president of the
USSR
,
to the intermediary, commissar Goloshchokin of the Ural Soviet, to the
head of the murder squad, Yurovsky. This involvement is mentioned by
the eminent Russian Jewish author Arkady Vaksberg in his 1994 book
“Stalin against the Jews”, in which he documents the principal
role of Jews in the Cheka and NKVD. So according to your country’s
court historians and political and judicial authorities who routinely
jail Germans who write such things, would Vaksburg be a perpetrator of
“amateur rubbish” and/or an anti-Semite to be imprisoned? What
about Churchill?
Immediately after the November Revolution the Petrograd Cheka
became the embryonic Soviet secret police, headed by Uritsky. The
first head of the Cheka was a Pole, Dzerzhinsky, of whom Vaksberg
states he was totally indifferent to his duties and focused on his
position as head of agriculture. Vaksberg states that the real head of
the Cheka was Yagoda, who became chief of the GPU.
Jewish
academic G Ginsberg, states that “during the 1920s and 1930s Jews
were a major element in the secret police…” (“The fateful
embrace – Jewry and the state”, 1994).
The director of the Gulag system was Frenkel, Matvei Berman was
chief of concentration camps. Boss of the White Sea canal slave labour
project was Firin; deputy chief, Rappoport; overseer Solts, at a time
when the NKVD was headed by Beria, whom the Jewish academic Prof. Ivan
Kalmar identifies as Jewish (“Portrait of a culture”, 1993).
The perpetrator of the contrived first Ukrainian famine was
Khalatov, and of the second Kaganovich. More died in that genocide
(7,000,000-10,000,000) than Jews who died in the German enemy alien
internment camps due to typhus and food shortages. In 1997 a book on
the Soviet secret police in the
Ukraine
was
written with the support of the post-KGB Secret Service, and was
therefore based on KGB archives. The book provides biographical notes
on the personnel, of whom 60% were Jewish. (Y Shapoval et al,
“Cheka-GPU-NKVD in the Ukraine”, Kiev 1997).
In 1995 Ukrainian prime minister Valery Gurzin stated that the
reason for Ukrainian anti-Semitism was due to the Jewish predominance
among the NKVD and as perpetrators of the Ukrainian famine. Presumably
he would be jailed if he made that statement in Germany (?).
The situation was the same with the monstrous Soviet regime in
Latvia
.
Bucinskis headed the Peoples Militia terror squads. Shivoshinsky
directed the camp system. Sustins was head of the Latvian NKVD.
Where Bolshevik regimes were established outside the
USSR
the
situation was the same. The brief lunatic regime in
Hungary
after
World War I headed by Bela Kun had Szamuelly in charge of the “Red
Terror”. After the war, when Rakosi was running things, Jewish
historian Paul Lendvai states of
Hungary
that
“the political police proper was headed by the Jewish Gabor Peter
and was staffed at its command level mainly by Jews.”
(“Anti-Semitism in Eastern European”, 1972).
In
Poland
after
the war Berman headed the secret police. Many Jews ran the
concentration camps. One of the most notorious was Solomon Morel, who
specialised in personally torturing and beating to death thousands of
ethnic Germans who had been trapped in
Poland
after
the war. The involvement of Jews such as Morel in this “ethnic
cleansing” was documented by the well-known Jewish author Jack Sack
who has been hypocritically attacked by the Holocaust lobby for his
book “An eye for an eye”(1993). Morel was indicted for war crimes
in 1998 but fled to
Israel
where
he sits safe in the knowledge that
Israel
,
which demands the extradition of every old man who fought against
Bolshevism, refuses to extradite any of its citizens wanted for being
perpetrators of Soviet terror. In 2000 the Israelis refused to assist
with the case against Nachman Dushansky wanted for war crimes in
Lituania, and of Semion Berkis-Burkov. So what moral or judicial
obligation does
Germany
have
to kow tow to every demand by Organised Jewry to prosecute its elderly
war heroes. Or to silence the late Gen. Remer, Germar Rudolf, Dr
Toben, Dr Staglich, Udo Wallendy, and literally thousands of others,
and most recently Messrs Hohmann and Brig. Gen. Guenzel?
Gen. Guenzel seems to have served his country with distinction,
yet one private letter that does not accord with the contrived image
of Jews as sacrosanct, albeit one based on historically-verifiable
fact, is sufficient to end a distinguished career overnight. What kind
of nation is it that treats its heroes and patriots in such a manner
yet lauds traitors such as Willy Brandt?
When one thinks of a Daniel Goldhagen or of the much lauded
Elie Wiesel, and many others who condemn Germans as a “perpetrator
race” on the basis of the Judaic concept of collective and
hereditary guilt, “people abroad” certainly “can’t underhand
it”. Most of all we can’t understand it when the German response
to such ridicule is to perversely roll over and beg for more.
Certainly the double standards involved are perpetrating an
unwarranted Germanophobia against post-war generations, as per the
abuse German schoolchildren receive in
England
when
on outings, or the bigotry experienced a few years ago by the little
German boy resident on
Stewart
Island
.
Considering the central role played by the German folk in the cultural
history of
Europe
and
of Western Civilisation, many more than only the Germans themselves
lose when German officialdom persists with its craven, defeatist
mentality.
Sincerely
Kerr
Bolton,
P.
O. Box
1627
,
Paraparaumu
Beach
New Zealand
-----
Original Message -----
From: Adelaide
Institute
Sent:
Friday,
November 14, 2003
10:40 PM
Subject:
Horst Mahler makes it happen in
Germany
Horst
Mahler on behalf of the
"Society
for the Rehabilitation of Those persecuted for
Refutation of the Holocaust" (VRBHV)
Press
release
On
a historic date,
the 9th of November 2003
, the "Society for the Rehabilitation
of Those persecuted for Refutation of the Holocaust" (VRBHV) was
founded in
Vlotho
,
Germany
. The German-Swiss history
teacher Bernhard Schaub, who is himself affected by persecution, was
elected as chairman. His deputy is the head of the Collegium
Humanum Ursula Haverbeck-Wetzel.
Based
on the article of the editor-in-chief of the newsmagazine DER SPIEGEL
Fritjof Meyer, "The Number of Victims of Auschwitz - New Insights due
to new Findings in the Archives" which appeared in the magazine Osteuropa
(no. 5/2002) under the responsibility of the former president of the
Bundestag Rita Süßmuth, the society is striving for the resumption of the
proceedings which have led to sentences due to denial or trivialisation
of the Holocaust in accordance with § 130 sects. 3 and 4 StGB [Penal
Code].
These
sentences are based without exception on the thesis asserted by ruling
historiography, that the millionfold industrial murder of the Jews which
was motivated by racism and which took place under the responsibility of
the German Reich under the Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler (known as
"Holocaust") is an obvious fact which therefore does not
require proof.
In
his essay, which was examined by numerous public prosecutors' offices
and declared to be innocuous, Meyer advocates the thesis that no mass killings
took place in the mortuaries of the crematoria I and II in the main
camp of
Auschwitz
, which up until now have been
described as the scene of the crime. The insights of Fritjof Meyer
confirm the results of the research of Prof. Robert Faurisson and Paul
Rassinier (France), of Fred Leuchter and Arthur Butz (USA), of David
Irving (UK), of Germar Rudolf, Wilhelm Stäglich and Udo Walendy
(Germany), of Jürgen Graf (Switzerland), Walter Lüftl and Wolfgang Fröhlich
(Austria), of Frederick Töben (Australia), and of numerous other
"revisionists" who have gathered evidence for the refutation
of the so-called Auschwitz-Lie.
While the historians named above totally deny the mass killings of Jews
through the gas Zyklon B, Fritjof Meyer assumes that the gassings with
Zyklon B probably (!) took place in two farm houses outside the
camp
Auschwitz
, with "probably (!) 356
000 murdered in the gas" (Jews and non-Jews). With this the
practice of prosecution which is based on the supposed
"obviousness" of the Holocaust has become obvious as being a
crime of the judicial machinery.
The
society is to eliminate the isolation of the persecuted which has
dominated so far, is to guarantee the necessary public awareness of
their struggle for justice, and is to provide the financial means for a
successful judicial struggle.
Amongst
others, the following acted as founders:
Ernst
Zündel, untiring fighter for Germany's honour (in "security
custody" under Guantanamo-like conditions in Canada), and his wife,
the novelist Ingrid Zündel-Rimland (USA);
Prof.
Dr. Robert Faurisson (France);
Museum
Director Rainer Daehnhardt (Portugal);
Germar
Rudolf, author of the Rudolf Report (in exile);
Jürgen
Graf, author (in exile); Gerd Honsik, author of the book Acquittal
for Hitler (in exile);
Dr Frederick
Töben, director of the Adelaide Institute (Australia);
Andres
Studer (in exile);
Hans-Dietrich
Sander, editor of the Staatsbriefe (Germany);
Manfred
Röder, German freedom fighter (in prison);
Frank
Rennicke, German singer-songwriter;
Hans
Schmidt, publisher (USA);
Anneliese
Remer, widow of Major General Otto Ernst Remer (Spain).
In
a letter from
the 9th of November 2003
to the signatory, Prof. Robert
Faurisson invited "all revisionists" to join the initiative of
this society.
A
copy of this letter in English, German, Italian and French is
appended to this press release.
Vlotho/Berlin
on
the 11th of November 2003
.
On
authority of the executive committee.
