The
Truth Shall Make You Mad
Edgar
J. Steele
February 15, 2004
"All
great truths begin as blasphemies."
--- George Bernard Shaw
"Speaking
the truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act."
--- George Orwell
"The
trust of the innocent is the liar's most useful tool."
--- from Needful Things, a novel by Stephen King
"Ye
shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad."
--- Aldous Huxley
Once
upon a time in
America
,
truth was an absolute defense to any charge of libel or slander.
Indeed, the whole point of trials and open-court litigation was
pursuit of the truth. No more. Trust me - I'm a lawyer
(said with a straight face, too).
Throughout
my career as a trial lawyer, always I have given the following advice
to my clients, be they plaintiffs or defendants: "Just tell
the truth. Then you never have to worry about what to say or
what you already might have said." Whenever a client then
has lied during the course of a case and refused to let me tell the
other side and do my best to compensate for that lie, that client has
had to find a new lawyer on the spot. Admittedly, mine is a
minority opinion in a profession that richly deserves all that is said
about it.
Nowadays,
though I still insist upon the truth (call it a weakness), I tell my
clients that likely it is irrelevant what they say. Of course,
most of my clients these days are politically incorrect. As I
have pointed out at length elsewhere (see "Injustice
for All," for example), there simply is no justice to
be obtained for the politically incorrect in
America
these days.
Increasingly,
litigation simply is window dressing, especially criminal litigation.
Particularly when it involves politically-incorrect defendants.
Many procedural and substantive reasons exist for the loss of truth
and justice, such as media vilification and prosecutorial misconduct
(beginning with gross overcharging), but they serve merely to mask the
true objective: silencing dissenters through the exercise of
power simply because that power is available.
Used
to be, we considered the role of truth merely when a legal case
already existed. Today, simply telling the truth can get you put
in an American jail. And it is about to get worse. Much worse.
America
has crossed the line into the prosecution of pure thought crimes and
there will be no turning back without a revolution. Yes, it is
because of the Jews. Hear me out, please. You need to
understand what I am about to tell you. You needn't agree just
yet, but you really need to understand the rationale.
Many
ask why I so condemn the Jews. In truth, it is a minority of
Jews to whom I really object: the Jewish supremacists.
If
you feel negatively about White supremacism, then merely imagine that
same concept, but from the point of view of the oppressed in
Palestine
;
that's Jewish supremacism, also known as Zionism these days.
Through silence, the rest of the Jews let the Zionists get away with
their brand of supremacism; they allow the transgressors to fall back
into their ranks and hide behind the hurled epithet of "antiSemite."
Those
who stand silently and wait also serve, as they say, so the Jewish
bystanders properly are charged with the crimes of their supremacist
brethren. That is why I rail against Jews, not just Zionists.
Jews
really do run most of the world. Certainly, all the Western
world. If you do not agree with this, then you need to do some
basic spadework, work that is beyond the scope of this piece you are
reading. It is so obvious, once you are willing to see it.
All
the power positions in government, both here and abroad, are occupied
by Jews, generally with only the head of state not being a Jew. The
media, virtually every last little scrap of it, is owned and managed
by Jews. Most of business is owned and/or controlled by
Jews. The recent transfer of ownership of the Russian oil empire
known as Yukos to the Rothschild family, because the owner was
indicted for corruption and fraud, illustrates how true Jewish
business ownership exists in many cases without being at all apparent.
The
central banks, especially the US Federal Reserve Bank (which is
neither Federal nor has any reserves) are owned and operated by Jews.
Again, Rothschild is a major player, even in ownership of the US
Federal Reserve Bank.
The
legal and medical professions have been taken over. These,
and more, are facts. Cold, hard, unassailable facts. But
they are facts that are unprintable, because they involve Jews.
Yet,
when Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir recently said the world is run
by Jews by proxy (that is, through their goyim puppets), he was
roundly condemned. And what he said was called a lie by
Israel
, where a furor erupted. You may recall that Israeli Prime
Minister Sharon has said, "We, the Jewish people, control
America
, and the Americans know it." (Tar
Baby II) Why do you suppose was it necessary for the
American President, of all people, to denounce Mahathir? If not
acting at Jewish direction, why would Bush II even care?
Mahathir told the truth, after all. Problem is, the truth
involved Jews.
America
outlaws boycotting the products of only one country in the world:
Israel
. And that law is enforced, as Cook Composites and Polymers
Company recently found out. Cook was fined $6,000 merely for
responding "to a request from a customer in
Bahrain
...stating that the goods being shipped were not of Israeli origin and
did not contain Israeli materials." (North
Kansas City company settles charge related to boycott of Israel,
Kansas City Star,
June 25, 2003
) Again, merely telling the truth runs afoul of the law, when
the truth involves Jews. And, as this boycott law blatantly
shows, it is the truth about only a single ethnic group that counts:
Jews.
Enter
Historical Revisionism, the quest to set the record straight.
During war, governments issue some of the most ridiculous statements
and push them as fact, in order to get their citizens on board with
their current war effort. The American claim during
Baghdad
I that Iraqi soldiers stole a
Kuwait
hospital's incubators, leaving babies to die on the cold tile floors,
is a particularly egregious recent example. It could have been a
scene from "Wag the Dog," it was so outlandishly false, as
since admitted by officials. The idea was to get Americans
behind the effort to intercede in the
Middle East
. It worked. Problem is, the story still occasionally
surfaces and gets passed around.
Historical
Revisionists endeavor to get history written correctly.
Currently, their main effort concerns World War II and the propaganda
pushed, first, to get
America
into the war and, later, to keep it there until its bloody end.
That propaganda has endured and grown, in fact, turning into a major
industry, the main purpose of which is to advance Zionist interests.
Even
though the stories about lampshades made from human skin and soap
rendered from the fat of Jewish victims have been as thoroughly
debunked as the Kuwaiti baby incubator fable, they still occasionally
bubble to the surface.
The
lies about the gas chambers and the ovens have only partially been
revealed. Similarly, though Jewish historians themselves admit
that far fewer perished, the myth that 6,000,000 Jews perished in
German concentration camps persists and is actively promoted at all
levels of society.
A
side note: outlandish claims of Jewish casualties is nothing
new. They claimed 6,000,000 in WWI, too, believe it or not.
And, as historian/journalist Michael Hoffman has pointed out:
“There are two early 'Holocaust' tales from the Talmud. Gittin
57b. claims that four billion Jews were killed by the Romans in the
city of
Bethar
. Gittin 58a claims that 16 million Jewish children were wrapped
in scrolls and burned alive by the Romans." Judaism's
Strange Gods, Michael Hoffman (Independent History, 2000) The Bible
abounds with outlandish claims of Jewish casualties, as well.
Publicly
challenging Jewish "Holocaust" claims will lead to a prison
sentence in most Western countries. And truth is no defense.
The mere revealing of the lies and their machinations is deemed
antiSemitic, you see. In fact, attempting to defend oneself
against these charges in court, once one is charged in some countries,
such as
Germany
, will result in fresh charges being filed. Yes, you read that
last sentence correctly. Repeating the offensive statements in
court is a separate offense!
The
Jewish ADL (AntiDefamation League) has been instrumental in getting
hate crime laws passed in most of
America
's states. Now they endeavor to convert those laws into pure
hate speech laws, as now exist in
Canada
and most of
Western Europe
. Already, the American laws are perverted to punish mere
speech, but that is not enough. Once speech itself, with no
accompanying crime, becomes formally illegal in
America
, then eradication of truth as a defense will follow, as it has in
Canada
and
Western Europe
. And it will be the truth concerning a single ethnic group that
will be most disallowed, of course: Jews.
You
needn't believe just me that Jews are special when it comes to
suppressing the truth. Listen to none other than
America
's Attorney General, John Ashcroft, as he prostrates himself before
the ADL: "Ninety years ago, the founders of the
Anti-Defamation League dedicated themselves to the noblest ideals.
They vowed to use their time, their energy, and their earnings to
stand against intolerance and to stand for freedom...This
administration believes that acts of anti-Semitism must be confronted,
condemned, and denounced...As history shows, verbal attacks on the
Jewish people are portends (sic) of more savage criminality to
come...The ADL has proven time and again its ability to warn of the
dangers to the innocent when the good and truehearted do not band
together to oppose hate." Prepared Remarks to the ADL of
Attorney General Ashcroft,
New York
,
New York
,
November 7, 2003
www.usdoj.gov/ag/speeches/2003/agantidefamation.htm
And
Ashcroft's is not a lone voice in the Administration, either.
FBI Director Mueller pandered to the
ADL at its 24th Annual National Leadership Conference in May of 2002:
"I have long admired and respected the work of ADL, and I
appreciate your longstanding support of the FBI. I know that
under my predecessor, Louis Freeh, this partnership reached new
heights...I am absolutely committed to building on that
relationship." http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/speeches/speech050702.htm
This
is the same ADL, by the way, that has been adjudged guilty of massive
theft and illegality in assembling a computerized database of
Americans it dislikes. And this is the same FBI that busted the
ADL in 1993, a bust which led to the judicial ruling that the ADL
violated a number of state and Federal laws when it stole data from a
variety of government offices, including the FBI itself.
http://www.impactnet.org/html/adl_spying.html
They
steal from the government, yet that same government then turns around
and praises the ADL and the partnership it has with one of the very
agencies from which it stole! Meanwhile, it is just business as
usual for the ADL and the Jewish interests it advances.
It
should not go unnoticed, either, that the guy who was responsible for
the ridiculous prosecutions of so many white American dissidents
lately, Michael Chertoff, is a Zionist who, as Director of the US
Justice Department's Criminal Division, directed the efforts of the
FBI for Ashcroft.
Clearly,
the Jews are getting their way in
America
, as they have in
Canada
and
Western Europe
; just as they did in
Russia
early last century. Today, of all Western Countries, only in
America
can I get away with writing this article. However, even in
America
I get roundly condemned and widely censored … for telling the
truth...about Jews.
Bush
II has proven himself to be nothing but a water carrier for Zionism.
With the eight original Democrat Presidential candidates each being
either Jewish or married to a Jew, it is clear that there will be no
change in the upcoming election. Some choice, huh? Things
will only get worse. Making Bush a one-termer (inevitable now, I
believe) merely will provide the illusion of "throwing the
rascals out."
Tomorrow
I will be unable to bring these truths to you. Tomorrow I will
be imprisoned, or worse, for even trying to do so. So will you.
Already, tomorrow has come to
Canada
and
Western Europe
.
Consider
what the day after tomorrow might bring. Are you getting mad yet?
I am, and I'm not alone. It is time. Time for a change. New
America
. An idea whose time has come.
-ed.
"I
didn't say it would be easy. I just said it would be the
truth."
-Morpheus
Copyright
©2003, Edgar J. Steele –
subscribe@conspiracypenpal.com
www.ConspiracyPenPal.com
Toben’s
website may be in breach
AVIVA
BARD
Australian Jewish
News -
5 March 2004
http://www.ajn.com.au/
JEWISH
community leaders are investigating whether Holocaust revisionist Dr
Fredrick Toben has breached a court order instructing him to remove
any material from his website which suggests that the Holocaust did
not occur.
At
the time of going to press, the front page of Dr Toben’s Adelaide
Institute website stated: “Why are we forced to believe in the
'Holocaust’? I don’t want to believe in the 'Holocaust’! Why is
it a crime not to believe in the 'Holocaust’? Why is it a crime to
say the 'Holocaust’ never happened?”
In
a landmark decision last July, the Federal Court ordered Dr Toben to
delete any material suggesting that the Holocaust did not take place
and that there were no gas chambers at
Auschwitz
.
It also ordered him to remove material which was likely to “offend,
insult, humiliate and intimidate” Australian Jews and not to
republish it.
The
case was brought by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ).
Weighing
up how to respond to the latest inclusions on the website, the NSW
Jewish Board of Deputies and ECAJ are considering “whether it
amounts to a breach of the orders already made”, or whether
“separate proceedings” should be instituted, board president and
senior counsel Stephen Rothman said this week.
Töben
responds:
Is
asking questions a crime for some?
Is
making statements that incite hatred against Germans for some an
Unquestionable RIGHT?
For
example any 'Holocaust' statement made is a direct attack on Germans
because it alleges that Germans were responsible for
1.
the death of six million Jews
2.
used homicidal gas chambers to exterminate Jews, and
3.
Hitler ordered a German national policy that Jews be exterminated –
solely
for Jews being Jews.
I
am not permitted to discuss these matter because I have a gag order
from the Federal Court of Australia that prevents me from detailing my
views, but anyone else is permitted to state that Germans did all
those things.
Natural
Justice, where art though in this moment of need when Stephen Rothman
again needs a sacrifice and possibly seeks his pound of flesh!
Auschwitz ashes to be buried in Melbourne
Brandon
Cohen
ASHES
recovered from one of the Holocaust’s worst killing fields on behalf
of Melbourne’s Jewish Holocaust Museum and Research Centre in the
late 1980s will finally be “laid to rest” next month at Springvale
cemetery.
Actress Ann Morell, now Morell-Crawford, and
her husband Glen Crawford, originally from
Melbourne
, brought
the
Auschwitz
ashes, now
contained in a small rectangular box, back to
Melbourne
at
the request of the museum’s inaugural president, the late Aron
Sokolowicz.
The
couple had visited the Elsternwick museum to obtain contacts for a
documentary they were planning to make on Polish children’s writer
Janusz Korczak — who ran an orphanage for 200 Jewish children in the
Warsaw Ghetto before they subsequently perished in Treblinka — when
Sokolowicz handed them a letter requesting the ashes.
According
to a report in the Sunday Age last week, Morell-Crawford and her
husband carefully hid the box of ashes in their luggage and undertook
an arduous journey through
Europe
and back to
Australia
.
“At
that time, when the Berlin Wall was up and
Eastern
Europe
was under
communism, the border guards regarded any westerner with paranoia,”
Morell-Crawford told the Sunday Age. “Believing something as
sensitive and precious as the ashes would be confiscated, buried under
miles of red tape or we would be detained, we smuggled them over
various checkpoints.”
From
our Archives –
Torment
of the Abba star with a Nazi father
The
Observer International |
Sunday June 30, 2002
|
Kate Connolly
Anni-Frid
was persecuted as a child of the 'master race', reports Kate Connolly.
Now people like her want justice.
When
Abba sang 'Knowing Me, Knowing You', there was one member of the cult
Swedish pop group for whom it had a special meaning. The brunette
Anni-Frid Lyngstad is one of thousands of people who grew up in
Scandinavia
shunned, persecuted and
parentless. It is alleged that some were even used as guinea pigs in
drugs trials.
Known
as the Tyskerbarnas or German children, they were the offspring of
Norwegian mothers and German soldier fathers, the result of a Nazi
plan to 'enrich' the Aryan gene pool.
Now
the group of up to 12,000, of whom many are now in their sixties,
plans to fight for compensation in the European Court of Human Rights.
Anni-Frid
Lyngstad's story is typical of the suffering of thousands. After her
birth in November 1945 - the result of a liaison between her mother,
Synni, and a German sergeant, Alfred Haase - the infant's mother and
grandmother were branded as traitors and ostracised in their village
in northern
Norway
. They were forced to emigrate
to
Sweden
, where Anni-Frid's mother
died of kidney failure before her daughter was two.
The
child found her father by chance three decades later. They met for an
emotional reunion in her Swedish villa, instigated by Benny Anderson,
an Abba founder and Anni-Frid's then husband.
Afterwards,
the singer said of the meeting and her father: 'It's difficult... it
would have been different if I'd been a teenager or a child. I can't
really connect to him and love him the way I would have if he'd been
around when I grew up.' The depression she subsequently suffered was
attributed by friends to the delayed encounter with her long-
lost
father, a retired pastry cook.
The
somewhat morose Anni-Frid, who withdrew for years in Greta Garbo
style, is nevertheless viewed as something of a role model by her
fellow Tyskerbarnas still living in
Norway
.
'She's
achieved amazing things in
Sweden
, something she would never
have been able to do had she stayed in
Norway
, where she would have been
branded a freak,' says Tor Brandacher, 63, spokesman for the
organisation representing the children. Founded in 1999, the group,
Krigsbarnforbundet Lebensborn, or Source of Life, takes its name from
the scheme run by Heinrich Himmler, the leader of Hitler's feared SS,
to create a master race.
It
has been pursuing its claims for compensation for abuse and
discrimination through the domestic courts. The case, involving 122
people, argues that the wartime Norwegian government - led by the
notorious Quisling - was complicit in the Nazi scheme to breed with
blonde, blue-eyed Norse women. The government asserts that if crimes
were committed, they happened too long ago to be dealt with now.
The
case is now going to the country's Supreme Court, but the victims and
their families are preparing to take it to the European Court of Human
Rights. 'Having been rejected by
Norway
so far, we have little choice
but to take our case further afield,' says Brandacher. 'We see
Norway
as a rundown gas station in
comparison to the gleaming motorway service station that is the ECHR
in
Strasbourg
,' says a hopeful Brandacher,
himself the son of an Austrian elite Gebirgsjäger soldier. He says
the Norwegian government is likely to face huge embarrassment once the
case receives full international attention.
Most
of the Lebensborn children
who
stayed in
Norway
are social misfits. Few have
received proper education or been employed. 'It's typical that they've
suffered from depression and low self-esteem,' says their lawyer,
Randi Hagen Spydevold. 'Most have had problems forming relationships
or being able to relate to the real world, which is hardly surprising
when you've spent your formative years being called a German idiot, a
no-good bastard who doesn't deserve to be alive.'
Had
Germany
won the war, they would
almost certainly have been heroes. But
Germany
lost, and soon afterwards the
Norwegian mothers lost their status, and their children were
classified as 'rats' by government officials.
The
postwar hatred towards the offspring of German soldiers was so great
that government psychologists commissioned to report on the children
and their mothers concluded that women who had fraternised with
Germans were 'of limited talent and asocial psychopaths, some of them
seriously backward'.
The
verdict 'father was a German' was indictment enough to send children
to mental hospitals, where many were tortured and raped. They were
deemed to be dangerous because of their 'Nazi genes' and capable of
forming a fascist fifth column.
Quisling's
government was desperate to be rid of the problem and attempted to
send the Tyskerbarnas as far afield as
Brazil
and
Australia
.
Sweden
was praised for taking
several hundred and thus relieving
Norway
of an embarrassing 'problem'.
Around 250 were sent 'back' to
Germany
.
Many
thousands of their mothers - labelled 'German whores' - were sent to
Norwegian 'concentration camps', where they were virtually slave
labourers. Of those children who ended up scattered around 128
Norwegian children's homes, many were released from their virtual
prisons as bewildered adults only in the early Sixties into a world of
which they had little or no experience.
When
her case comes before the supreme court, Spydevold has as one of her
witnesses a highly-experienced judge who will testify that a high
percentage of the criminals he has seen have been the result of the
Lebensborn experiment. 'He will testify that through the Norwegian
government's neglect of them, many turned to crime,' Spydevold told The
Observer.
But
in many ways the most shocking aspect of the whole story is what
happened to the children in the homes. In a separate case, Spydevold
is attempting to bring the Norwegian government to task over
documented evidence of drugs trials carried out on both children and
mothers. Witnesses and documents say experiments with LSD, mescaline
and other substances were initiated by the Norwegian military,
Oslo
University
and the CIA.
For
Harriet von Nickel, born in March 1942, the road to justice is long
but worthwhile. 'As a two-year-old living with foster parents, I was
chained up with the dog in the yard,' she says in German Child, her
best-selling autobiography.
'As
a six-year-old I was thrown in the river by a man from my village, who
said he wanted to see if "the witch will drown or float",'
she writes. At the age of nine or 10, she says, drunken villagers from
Bursr, near
Trondheim
, branded her forehead with a
swastika made of bent nails, and threatened to rape her. 'A woman
saved me, and I rubbed sandpaper on my skin to get rid of the
swastika.'
Money
King Soros’ World Revolution
George
Soros: Imperial Wizard/Double Agent
by
Heather Cottin, from Western Destiny, No 34, February 2004
“There
does exist, and has exited for a generation, an international network,
which has no aversion to co-operating with communists, or any other
groups, and frequently does so. I know the operations of this network
because I have studied it for twenty years, and was permitted for two
years, in the early 1960s to examine its papers and secret records…
It is this power structure which the Radical Right in the
US
has been attacking for years in the belief that they were attacking
the Communists…”
Prof.
Carroll Quigley, foremost American historian, Tragedy & Hope,
MacMillan, NY, 1966.
“There
is no proletarian, not even a communist, movement that has not
operated in the interests of money, and for the time permitted by
money – and that without the idealists amongst its leaders having
the slightest suspicion of the fact.”
Oswald
Spengler, The Decline of The West, 1918
The following article, apparently by a
Leftist, albeit non-liberal, of some persuasion, provides a well
documented background on the subversive nature of George Soros’
global machinations. Here we see Soros as the money bags for numerous
– often Left/liberal, movement and individuals – pushing
revolution and subversion under the name of humanitarianism, human
rights, and democracy. Like the anti-apartheid offensive directed
against
South
Africa
,
which merely resulted in the globalisation and privatisation of the SA
economy, the Left can be seen in its historic role as lackey’s of
plutocracy. We have added emphasis and comments.
Soros’
“open society” revolutions in true capitalistic fashion, are
directed against traditional societies, and the network of Soros
foundations fund feminism and abortion rights, warding off any moves
to re-establish traditional, religious based societies among Orthodox
East Europeans and Muslims, especially in the former Soviet region.
Karl Marx would have been encouraged, having stated in the Communist
Manifesto and elsewhere, that Free Trade is a subversive doctrine
undermining tradition and nationalism. Further information on this is
contained in our own booklet Useful
Idiots of the New World Order.
The New Left in the
United States
was a social democratic
movement. It was
resolutely anti-Soviet, and when
Eastern Europe
and the
USSR
fell, few in the New Left opposed the destruction of the socialist
systems. The New
Left did not mourn or protest when the hundreds of millions in
Eastern Europe
and
Central Asia
lost their right to jobs,
housing at reasonable and legally protected rents, free education
through graduate school, health care and cultural enhancement. Most
belittled any suggestion that the CIA and certain NGOs such as the
National Endowment for Democracy or the Open Society Fund had actively
participated in the annihilation of socialism. These people felt that
the Western determination to destroy the
USSR
since 1917 was
barely connected to the fall of the
USSR
. For them, socialism failed
of its own accord, because it was flawed.
[The
New Left was Trotskyite in outlook. What was objectionable to them was
that socialism proceeded along nationalistic lines in the Soviet bloc
since the time Stalin eliminated Trotsky and his concept of world
revolution. These Trotskyites, motivated primarily by a hatred of a
Trotsky-free
USSR
, joined in large numbers the
American Establishment in attacking the
USSR
. Leading Trotskyites
including Prof. Sidney Hook and James Burnham, became proponents of
the Cold War against the
USSR
. Prof. Hook was honoured by
the Reagan Administration whilst insisting he never reneged on his
Trotskyite beliefs. These Establishment Bolsheviks led the CIA front,
the Congress for Cultural Freedom which sponsored much of the cultural
junk that subverted Western traditional culture.
Ms
Cottin errs in her belief that “the West” had sought to destroy
the
USSR
since 1917. Rather the
USA
under the banker controlled
Wilson Administration ensured the survival of the
USSR
when Lenin and Trotsky were
fighting for their survival against the White Armies.
Wilson
pushed for the recognition of
the Bolshevik Government at the Paris Peace Conference, at a time when
the Soviets controlled little of
Russia
. American troops were under
orders form Wilson himself NOT to intervene on behalf of the White
Armies. Rather, American troops were stationed at Vladivostock to
maintain order until the Bolsheviks could take over government. The
Vladivostock Soviet praised the
US
forces and thanked them for
their assistance, according to a report in the NY Times,
Feb. 15, 1920
. “
Vladivostok
pro-American, Revolutionist
staff thanks [Gen.]
Graves
for preserving neutrality”
runs the headline. The
Roosevelt
Admin. adopted a pro-Stalin
policy for the duration of the war against the Axis and hoped the
alliance would continue to build a post-war New World Order via the
UNO. Stalin scuttled the globalist scheme by insisting on Security
Council vetoes in the UNO and rejecting the Baruch Plan for the
“internationalisation of nuclear energy”. Stalin correctly viewed
both schemes as methods of ensuring American global domination. The
Cold War was the result. The so-called ‘neo-cons’ who dominate the
Bush Admin. are descended from these Trotskyite Establishment
Bolsheviks and are far from “conservatives”. These are the coterie
with which Soros is working. See our booklet
America
,
Russia
& the
New World
Order.].
As
revolutions, such as the ones in
Mozambique
,
Angola
,
Nicaragua
or
El Salvador
were destroyed
by proxy forces or were stalled by demonstration “elections,” New
Left pragmatists shrugged their shoulders and turned away. The New
Left sometimes seemed to deliberately ignore the post-Soviet
machinations of
U.S.
foreign policy.
[The
“New Left”, like the Trotskyite Old Left, was spawned by the
American Establishment. Feminists such as Gloria Steinem were
sponsored by the CIA, as was drug culture guru Timothy Leary. The SDS
emerged from the CIA funded National Students Association. See our
booklet, Useful Iidiots…].
Bogdan
Denitch, who had political aspirations in Croatia, was active within
the Open Society Institute, and received OSI funding. 36 Denitch
favored the ethnic cleansing of Serbs from
Croatia
,
NATO bombing of
Bosnia
and then
Yugoslavia
,
and even a ground invasion of
Yugoslavia
.
37 Denitch was a founder and chair for many years of the Democratic
Socialists of
America
,
a leading liberal-left group in the
U.S.
He has also long chaired the prestigious Socialist Scholars
Conference, through which he was key to manipulating the sympathies of
many toward support for NATO expansion. 38
Other
Soros targets for support include Refuse and Resist, the ACLU, and a
host of other liberal causes. 39 Soros added another unlikely trophy
when he became involved in the New School for Social Research in New York, long an academy of
choice for left intellectuals. He now funds the East and Central
Europe Program there.40
[The
New School for Social Research was a typically banker funded Left-wing
institution from which has emerged what is now known as Political
Correctness, a mutation of Bolshevism of service to the plutocrats in
the guise of ‘radicalism’ and ‘progress’. Most of the funding
for the
New
School
has come from the Rockefeller
foundation. See our Useful
Idiots…].
Many
leftists who were inspired by the revolution in
Nicaragua
sadly accepted the election
of Violetta Chamorro and the defeat of the Sandinistas in 1990. Most
of the
Nicaragua
support network faded
thereafter. Perhaps the New Left could have learned from the rising
star of Michael Kozak. He
was a veteran of
Washington
’s campaigns to install
sympathetic leaders in
Nicaragua
,
Panama
and
Haiti
, and to undermine
Cuba
- he headed the U.S.
Interests Section in
Havana
.
After
organizing the Chamorro victory in
Nicaragua
, Kozak moved on
to become U.S. Ambassador to
Belarus
. Kozak
worked with the Soros-sponsored “Internet Access and Training
Program” (IATP), which was busy “creating future leaders” in
Belarus
.
41 This program was simultaneously imposed upon
Armenia
,
Azerbaijan
,
Georgia
,
Kazakhstan
,
Kyrgystan
,
Turkmenistan
,
and
Uzbekistan
.
IATP operates openly with the support of the
U.S.
Department of State. To its credit,
Belarus
expelled Kozak and the Soros-Open Society/U.S. State Department crowd.
The government of Aleksandr
Lukashenko found that for four years before moving to
Minsk
,
Kozak was instrumental in engineering the flow of tens of millions of
dollars to the
Belarus
opposition.
Kozak was creating a united opposition coalition, funding web-sites,
newspapers and opinion polls, and tutoring a student resistance
movement similar to
Yugoslavia
’s
Otpor. Kozak brought in Otpor leaders to instruct dissidents in
Belarus
.
42
Just before
September 11,
2001
, the
U.S.
was revving up a
demonization campaign against
President Aleksandr Lukashenko. Demonizing Lukashenko has
temporarily taken a back burner to the “war on terrorism.”
Through OSI and HRW,
Soros was a major supporter of the B-92 radio station in
Belgrade
.
Soros funded Otpor, the organization that received those “suitcases
of money” in support of the
October
5, 2000
coup that toppled the Yugoslav government.
43 Human Rights Watch helped legitimize the subsequent kidnapping
and show trial of Slobodan Milosevic in
The Hague
by saying
nothing about his rights.” 44 Louise Arbour, who served as judge at
that illegal tribunal, is presently on the Board of Soros’
International Crisis Group. 45 The Open Society/Human Rights Watch
gang has been working on
Macedonia
, calling it part
of their “civilizing mission.” 46 Expect that republic to be
“saved” to finish the total disintegration of the former
Yugoslavia
.
DEPUTIES
OF POWER
Soros
has actually stated that he considers his philanthropy moral and his
money management business amoral. 47 Yet those in charge of
Soros-funded NGOs have a clear and consistent agenda. One of Soros’
most influential institutions is the International
Crisis Group, founded in
1986.
ICG is headed by individuals from the very center of political and
corporate power. Its board includes Zbigniew Brzezinski, [founding
director of David Rockefeller’s think tank, the Trilateral
Commission, which sponsored Jimmy Carter’s rise to the presidency]
Morton Abramowitz, former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State; Wesley
Clark, former NATO Supreme Allied Commander for Europe; and Richard
Allen, former U.S. National Security Adviser. Allen is noteworthy for
quitting Nixon’s National Security Council out of disgust with the
liberal tendencies of Henry Kissinger; recruiting Oliver North to
Reagan’s National Security Council, and negotiating missiles for
hostages in the Iran-Contra scandal. For these individuals,
“containing conflict” boils down to
U.S.
control over the people and
resources of the world.
In
the 1980s and 1990s, under the aegis of the Reagan Doctrine,
U.S.
covert and overt operations in
Africa
,
Latin America
, the
Caribbean
, and
Asia
were in the works. Soros was
openly active in most of these places, working to buy off would-be
revolutionaries, or subsidize politicians, intellectuals and anyone
else who might come to power when the revolutionary moment had passed.
According to James Petras:
“By the early 1980s the more
perceptive sectors of the neoliberal ruling classes realized that
their policies were polarizing the society and provoking large-scale
social discontent. Neoliberal politicians began to finance and promote
a parallel strategy ‘from below,’ the promotion of
‘grassroots’ organizations with an ‘anti-statist’ ideology to
intervene among potentially conflictory classes, to create a “social
cushion.” These organizations were financially dependent on
neoliberal sources and were directly involved in competing with
sociopolitical movements for the allegiance of local leaders and
activist communities. By the 1990s these organizations, described as
“nongovernmental,” numbered in the thousands and were receiving
close to four billion dollars world-wide.”48[Soros
is playing the role of Jacob Schiff, the head of Kunh Loeb & Co.
who funded the revolution against
Russia.
].
In
Underwriting Democracy, Soros boasts about the
“Americanization of Eastern Europe.” According to his account,
through his education programs he began to establish a young cadre of
Sorosian leaders. These Soros Foundation-educated young men and women
are prepared to fulfill the functions of so-called “influence
agents.” Thanks to their fluent knowledge of languages and their
insertion into the emerging bureaucracies in target countries, these
recruits would philosophically smooth the inroads for Western
multinational corporations.
[Where
Governments prove resistant, as we have seen, ‘revolutionaries’
are bought off to topple them with
US
connivance, under the guise
of ‘democracy’].
Career
diplomat Herbert Okun, on the Europe Committee of Human Rights Watch, along
with George Soros, is connected to a host of State Department-linked
institutions, from USAID to the Rockefeller-funded
Trilateral Commission. From 1990 to 1997, Okun was executive
director of something called the Financial
Services Volunteer Corps, part of USAID, “to help establish free
market financial systems in former communist countries.” 49
George Soros is in complete accord with the capitalists who are in the
process of taking control of the global economy.
NON-PROFIT
PROFITEERING
Soros
claims not to do philanthropy in the countries in which he is involved
as a currency trader. 50 But Soros has often taken advantage of his
connections to make key investments. Armed with a study by ICC, and
with the support of Bernard
Kouchner, chief of the UN Interim Administration in Kosovo (UNMIK),
Soros attempted to acquire the most profitable mining complex in the
Balkans.
In
September 2000, in a hurry to take the Trepca mines before the
Yugoslavian election, Kouchner stated that pollution from the mining
complex was raising lead levels in the environment. 51 This is
incredible considering that he cheered when the 1999 NATO bombing of
Yugoslavia
rained depleted uranium on
the country and released more than
100,000
tons of carcinogens into the air, water and soil. 52 But Kouchner had
his way, and the mines were closed for “health reasons.”
[An
e.g. of the use of ostensible ‘environmentalism’ for plutocratic
purposes].
Soros
invested $150 million in an effort to gain control of Trepca’s gold,
silver, lead, zinc and cadmium, which make the property worth $5
billion. 53 As
Bulgaria
was imploding
into “free-market” chaos, Soros was busy scavenging through the
wreckage, as Reuters reported in early 2001:
“The European Bank for
Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) invested $3.0 million in
[Bulgarian high-tech company] Rila, the first firm to benefit from a
new $30 million facility set up by the EBRD to support IT firms in
central and eastern Europe.... Another $3. 0 million came from U.S
private investment fund Argus Capital Partners, sponsored by
Prudential Insurance Company of
America
and operating in central and eastern Europe... Soros, who had invested
around $3.0 million in Rila and in 2001 invested another $1.0
million...remained its majority owner.” 54
In
Colombia
, labor leaders are routinely
killed by paramilitaries working in concert with the U.S.-sponsored
government. Because those unions oppose neoliberal economics, HRW
[Human Rights Watch] is relatively silent. In April of this year,
HRW’s Jose Vivanco testified before the U.S. Senate in favor of Plan
Colombia
: 55 “Colombians remain committed to human rights and democracy. They need
help. Human Rights Watch has no fundamental problem with the
United
States
providing that help.”
56 HRW equates the actions of the Colombian guerrilla fighters
struggling to free themselves from the oppression of state terror,
poverty and exploitation with the repression of the U.S-sponsored
armed forces and paramilitary death squads, the AUC (United Self-Defense
Forces of Colombia). HRW validated the Pastrana government and its
military, whose role was to protect property rights and maintain the
economic and political status quo. According to HRW, 50% of civilian
deaths are the work of the government-tolerated death squads. 57 The
correct number is 80%. 58 HRW essentially certified the election and
ascendancy
of the Uribe government in 2002 as well. Uribe is a throwback to the
Latin American dictators the
U.S.
supported in the past,
although he was “elected.” HRW had no comment about the fact that
the majority boycotted the election. 59
In
the Caribbean Basin, Cuba is another opponent of neoliberalism that
has been demonized by Human Rights Watch. ... When Sorosian
organizations count, they seem to lose track of the truth. Human
Rights Watch asserted that 500 people, not over 2,000, were killed by
NATO bombers in the 1999 war in
Yugoslavia
. 65 They said only 350, not
over 4,000, died as a result of
U.S.
attacks on
Afghanistan
. 66 When the
U.S.
bombed
Panama
in 1989, HRW prefaced its
report by saying that the “ouster of Manuel Noriega.. and
installation of the democratically-elected government of President
Guillermo Endara brought high hopes in
Panama
...” The report neglected to
mention the number of casualties.
Human Rights Watch prepared the
groundwork for the NATO attack on
Bosnia
in 1993 by the false rape-of-thousands and “genocide” stories.
67 This tactic of creating political hysteria was necessary for the
United
States
to carry out its Balkan policy. It was repeated in 1999 when HRW
functioned as the shock troops of indoctrination for the NATO attack
on
Yugoslavia
.
All of Soros’ blather about the rule of law was forgotten.
The
U.S.
and NATO made their own law, and the institutions of George Soros
stood behind it.
Massaging
of numbers to provoke a response was a major part of a Council on
Foreign Relations [CFR – a plutocratic think tank founded in the
1920s to provide US administrations with personnel]. campaign after
September 11,2001
. This time it was the 2,801
killed in the
World
Trade
Center
. The CFR met on
November 6, 2001
, to plan a “major public
diplomacy campaign.” CFR created an “Independent Task Force on
America
’s Response to Terrorism.”
Soros joined Richard C. Holbrooke, Newton L. Gingrich, John M.
Shalikashvili (former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff), and
other powerful individuals on a campaign to make the Trade Center dead
into tools for U.S. foreign policy. The CFR report set out to make the
case for a war on terrorism. George Soros’ fingerprints were all
over the campaign:
“Have senior-level
U.S.
officials press friendly Arab and other Muslim governments not only to
publicly condemn the 9/11 attacks, but also to back the rationale and
goals of the
U.S.
anti-terror campaign. We are never going to convince the publics in
the
Middle
East
and
South
Asia
of the righteousness of our cause if their governments remain silent.
We need to help them to deflect any blow-back from such statements,
but we must have them vocally on board.... Encourage Bosnian,
Albanian, and Turkish Muslims to educate foreign audiences regarding
the
U.S.
role in saving the Muslims of
Bosnia
and Kosovo in 1995-99, and our long-standing, close ties to Muslims
around the world. Engage regional intellectuals and journalists across
the board, regardless of their views. Routinely monitor the regional
press in real time to enable prompt responses... Stress references to
the victims (and ideally named victims to personalize them) whenever
we discuss our cause and goals.” 68 [emphasis added].
[Soros’
opposition to George Bush therefore rings hollow. It is rather a
matter of image in regard to the so-called “war on terrorism”
rather than substance].
Sorosian
innumeracy: counting to bolster and defend
U.S.
foreign policy. Soros is very
worried about the decline in the world capitalist system and he wants
to do something about it, now. He recently said: “I can already discern the makings of the final crisis.... Indigenous
political movements are likely to arise that will seek to expropriate
the multinational corporations and recapture the ‘national’
wealth.” 69
[Read
that quote again. Here is Soros’ agenda, and that of other
plutocrats: expropriation of the resources of nations and their
concentration into the hands of a global coterie].
Soros
is seriously suggesting a plan to circumvent the United Nations.
He proposes that the “democracies
of the world ought to take the lead and forge a global network of
alliances that could work with or without the United Nations.”
If he were psychotic, one might think he was having an episode. But
the fact is, Soros’ assertion that “The United Nations is constitutionally incapable of fulfilling the
promises contained in the preamble of its charter,” reflects the
thinking of such reactionary institutions as the American Enterprise
Institute. 70 Though many conservatives refer to the Soros network as
left-wing, on the question of U.S. affiliation with the United Nations
Soros is on the same page as the likes of John R. Bolton,
Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security
Affairs, who, with “[M]any Republicans in Congress-believe that
nothing more should be paid to the UN system.” 71 There has been a
decades-long rightwing campaign against the UN. Now Soros is leading
it.
[Ms
Cottin should also dig a bit further on the UNO. She would find that
it was founded by plutocrats for the purpose of establishing a New
World Order. Most of the planning personnel were drawn from the CFR
and the land for the UNO building was donated by the Rockefellers. The
UNO was set up with precisely the same humanitarian façade as that
now used by Soros to promote his plutocratic revolutions. The plan to
use the UNO as an instrument for world government was scuttled by
Stalin who insisted on Soviet nationalist and imperial interests].
35. See Sean Gervasi, “Western
Intervention in the
USSR
,”
CovertAction Information Bulletin, no. 39, Winter 1991-92. 36. “The
Cenasia Discussion List,” http://www.eurasianet.org/resource/cenasia/hypermail/200102/0052.html.
37. Bogdan Denitch, “The Case Against
Inaction,” The Nation,
April
26, 1999
.
38. “Biographies, 2002 Socialist
Scholars Conference,” http://www.socialistscholar.org/biographies.
39. “Grants,” http://www.soros.org/repro/grants.
40. “East and Central Europe Program,” http://www.newschool.edu/centers/ecep.
41. Oxana Popovitch, “IREX
Belarus
Opens a New IATP Site in Molodechno.” http://www.iatp.net/archive/belarus.
42. lan Traynor, “Belarussian Foils
Dictator-buster...For Now,” Guardian,
September
14, 2001
, http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,551533,00.html
43.Steven Erlanger, “Kostunica Says Some
Backers ‘Unconsciously Work for American Imperial Goals,”’ New
York Times,
September
20, 2000
;
and “Bringing Down a Dictator,
Serbia
Calling.” PBS, http://www.pbs.org/weta/dictator/rock/serbiacalling.html
44. Milosevic in
the
Hague
,
Focus on Human Rights, “In-Depth Report Documents Milosevic
Crimes,” April 2001, http://www.hrw.org/press/2001/10/milocroat1029.htm.
45. “About ICG,” May 2002, http://www.intl-crisis-group.org/annual/2002/ICG2002.pdf.
46.
Macedonia
Crimes Against Civilians: Abuses by Macedonian Forces in Lluboten,
August
10-12, 2001
47. Andrew Leonard. “The Man Who Bought the World,”
February
28, 2002
,
Salon.com. http://archive.salon.com/tech/books/2002/02/28/soros/
48. James Petras, “Imperialism and NGOs
in
Latin
America
,”
Monthly Review, vol. 49, no. 7, December 1997.
49. International Security Studies,
“Herbert Okun,” http://www.yale.edu/iss/peopleadvisoryboard1.
50. Leonard. 51. Edward W. Miller,
“Brigandage,” Coastal Post Monthly,
Mann County
,
CA
,
September
52. Mirjan Nadrljanski, “Eco-Disaster in
Pancevo: Consequences on the Health of the Population,”
July
19, 1999
, http://www.gci.ch/GreenCrossPrograms/legacy/yugoslavia/Nadrljanski.html
53. “Soros Fund Launches $150 MIn
U.S.Backed Balkans Investment,” Bloomberg Business News,
July
26, 2000
;
Chris Hedges, “Below It All in Kosovo,”
New
York
limes,
July
8,1998
,
p. A4.
54. Galina Sabeva, “Soros’
Sofia
IT
Firm Gets $9 Million Equity Investment,” Reuters,
January
23, 2001
.
55. On Plan
Colombia
see: Manuel Salgado Tamayo, “The Geostrategy of Plan Colombia
CovertAction Quarterly no. 71, Winter 2001.
56.“
Colombia
:
Human Rights Watch Testifies Before the Senate,” Human Rights Watch
Backgrounder,
April
24, 2002
, http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/americas/colombia-testimony0424.htm.
57.“
Colombia
:
Bush/Pastrana Meeting, HRW World Report 2001, Human Rights News” (
New
York
,
November
6, 2001
).
58. Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting,
Action Alert,”
New York
limes Covering for Colombian Death Squads,”
February
9, 2001
.
59.
Doug Stokes “
Colombia
Primer Q&A on the Conflict and
U.S.
Role,”
April
16, 2002
.
Znet, http://www.zmag.org/content/Colombia/stokes_col-primer.cfm.
60.Interpress Service,
January
18, 1995
.
For additional background see Jane Regan, “AIDing U.S. Interests In
Haiti,” CovertAction Quarterly no. 51, Winter 1994-95; and Noam
Chomsky, “Haiti, The Uncivil Society,” CovertAction Quarterly no.
57, Summer 1996.
61.
Sam Tucker, Human Rights Watch, http://www.webactive.com/webactive/sotw/hrw.
62.
John Kenneth Knaus, Orphans of the Cold War (New York, BBS Public
Affairs 1999), p. 236.
63.
Elisabeth Rosenthal, “Defiant Chinese Muslims Keep Their Own
Time,”
New
York
limes,
November
19, 2000
,
p. 3.
64.
Jonathan Reynolds (pseudonym), “The Clandestine Chef,” New York
Times Magazine,
December
3, 2000
.
65.
“Lessons of War,” Le Monde Diplomatique, March 2000; Peter
Phillips, “Untold Stories of U.S./NATO’s War and Media
Complacency,” http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/suntold.htm
66.
Marc W. Herold, “A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States’
Aerial Bombing of Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting,” http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/civiDeaths.html
67. “Rape as a crime against humanity,” http://www.haverford.edu/relg/sells/rape.html
68.“Improving the Public Diplomacy
Campaign in the War Against Terrorism,” Independent Task Force on
America
’s
Response to Terrorism, Council on Foreign Relations,
November
6, 2001
.
69.
William Greider, “Curious George Talks the Market, The Nation,
February
15, 1999
.
70.
“Oppose John Bolton’s Nomination as State Department’s Arms
Control Leader,” Council for a Livable World,
April
11, 2001
, http://www.clw.org/bush/opposebolton.html
71.
Ibid. 72. Greider. 73.
“The Dictatorship of Financial
Capital,” Federation of Social and Educational Assistance (FASE),
Brazil
,
2002, http://www.fase.org.br
Shevardnadze
accuses Soros of organising a coup d’etat in
Georgia
http://newsfromrussia.com/world/2003/12/01/51582.html
Former
President of Georgia Eduard Shevardnadze has accused American financier
George Soros of organising the events that led to the coup d’etat in
that Caucasian republic. “This
is his plan,” said Shevardnadze in the “News
of the Week” programme on the Rossia TV channel. According to him,
Soros has formulated “a whole
concept how to hold elections so that new people come to the government,
and how to found such organisations as in
Yugoslavia
.”
“This is the plan of Soros. He provided for everything: how much money
is necessary, what government organisations are reliable, with whom it
is necessary to cooperate,” said
he. Shevardnadze reminded the audience that one of the American
organisations got access to the lists of the constituents compiled by
the municipal authorities of
Georgia
. After that many
names disappeared from the lists, said the ex-President. “You have driven him (Soros) away from
Russia
,
and you were right. His behaviour is not good. He should not poke his
nose into politics in general,”
he added.
|
