ISSN 1440-9828
                                                                      No 276


Tehran: 21:30 ,  2005/12/31

Referendum in Palestine is a fair idea: expert

TEHRAN, Dec. 31 (MNA) -- In a recent speech in southern Iran the President Mahmud Ahmadinejad reiterated Iran’s principled stance that the Islamic Republic believes holding a comprehensive referendum in the occupied territories with the participation of all native Palestinians, including Muslims, Christians, and Jews, is the best option to resolve the longstanding Middle East crisis.


In light of Iran’s position, the Mehr News Agency has conducted a series of interviews with scholars from all over the world to learn their views on the so-called holocaust and the idea to hold a referendum in Palestine. Egyptian-born scholar Mohammed Hegazi, who resides in Australia, expressed his backing for the Iranian proposal to hold a referendum. In an interview on December 26, Hegazi said, “The question of a referendum amongst the people now living in pre-1948 Palestine is also a fair idea that should be highlighted.”


Following is the text of the interview:


Q: Why are Arab authors and intellectuals not willing to speak about the holocaust adequately?


A: Egypt is a dictatorship, one of the worst models you can imagine. The media has been government owned until fairly recently. When the system decided to allow some opposition newspapers, that was done only to improve its image, by giving the false impression of a free press. The rest of the Arab countries all have corrupt despotic governments. Scholars and free thinkers tend to shy off under such oppressive conditions. Opinions of Arab historians about the Jewish holocaust are not widely circulated, but they share the same views expressed by Mr. Ahmadinejad about the fallacy of the holocaust.


Q: How is the atmosphere in Australia for the free expression of views about the holocaust, given that Australia hasn't passed a law against revisionism?


A: Like in most countries of the West, Jews control government and the judiciary in Australia. There are constant attempts to vilify those scholars    who "offend" Jews by denying the myth of the Jewish holocaust. Some   laws have already been passed under the guise of preventing "racial hatred". The crux of such laws is that you should not "offend" minorities, regardless of the historical correctness of what you say. They follow the same model Jews have imposed on many European countries. There are constant attempts to silence my colleague Fredrick Toben, who has been given a hard time in courts in order to dismantle the website of Adelaide Institute. So far, we continue to express our views on the site, with much caution, like our counterparts in other parts of our Jew-controlled world.


Q: What is your view of the Iranian president’s remarks that the holocaust is a myth? What is your evaluation of the possibility of holding a comprehensive referendum in the occupied territories?


A: Iran is to be commended for a number of conferences that were held in support of the Palestinian people by non-government organizations (NGOs). The frequency of such conferences is restricted by the limited resources of NGOs. No conferences were held for the purpose of exposing the Jewish holocaust as a fallacy and a stark historical lie. The views on the subject that were courageously expressed by Mr. Ahmadinejad have sent shockwaves across timid European governments. It would be quite apt for an Iranian information government body to follow up with a conference, or a series of conferences, on the history of the Jewish holocaust. Let historians from all over the world prove that the statements of Mr. Ahmadinejad were historically correct. The question of a referendum amongst the people now living in pre-1948 Palestine is also a fair idea that should be highlighted.






From the Archives

Israel unleashes its death squads - Sunday Times, 19 January 2003

ISRAELI death squads have been authorised to enter "friendly" countries and assassinate opponents in a move that raises the prospect of political killings in Australia. Agents of the Israeli secret service Mossad have been given free rein to kill those deemed to be a threat to the Jewish state - wherever they are hiding.

Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, who has until now refused permission for assassinations on the home ground of allies, has reversed the policy as part of a more aggressive approach to terrorism. The move was revealed by former Mossad agents in a series of interviews with US news agency United Press International. It was later confirmed by US intelligence officials. They said the policy raised the potential for killings in countries with close ties to Israel, including the US, Britain and Australia.

One Mossad official told UPI the policy shift was prompted by "a huge budget" increase for the agency as part of "a tougher stance in fighting global jihad (or holy war)".

"Targeted killings" have, in the main, been restricted to the West Bank and Gaza because "no one wanted such operations on their territory", one Israeli official said. But that is changing with the appointment late last year of new Mossad director Meir Dagan.

Another former Mossad agent told UPI: "Diplomatic constraints have prevented Mossad from carrying out preventive operations (assassinations) on the soil of friendly countries until now."

Mr Sharon and Mr Dagan were now "reversing that policy, even if it risks complications to Israel's bilateral relations".

A third source said Mr Sharon wanted "greater operational maneuverability" for Mossad. Asked if that meant assassinations within allied countries, he said: "It does."

The move comes in the wake of the assassination by the CIA of al-Qaeda suspects in Yemen. Qaed Sinan Harithi and five other suspects were killed last year when an unmanned Predator spy plane fired a Hellfire missile at their car. That attack is thought to have limited the ability of the US to protest about Mossad killings abroad. "That (the Predator attack) was done on the soil of a friendly ally," an official at the US Congress said. "I don't know on what basis we would be able to protest Israel's actions."

Israel has in the past sent hit squads to kill opponents in hostile countries such as Lebanon, and snatch squads have been used extensively throughout the world. Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann was captured in Argentina in 1960, taken to Israel and executed.

In 1986, scientist Mordechai Vanunu was snatched in Rome and transported to Israel after revealing details of Israel's nuclear weapons program. He was sentenced to 18 years jail, only being released from solitary confinement in 1998.

One of the few known cases of Mossad hitmen carrying out an assassination on friendly soil occurred on July 21, 1973, when a Mossad team shot dead Moroccan waiter Ahmed Bouchikhi as he walked home from the cinema with his pregnant wife in the Norwegian ski resort of Lillehammer. The assassins apparently mistook Bouchikhi for Hassan Salameh, a PLO intelligence chief suspected of masterminding the killing of 11 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics. Gullow Gjeseth, who led a Norwegian Government inquiry into the shooting, said: "This was much more than a murder. This was a violation of Norwegian sovereignty." In January 1996, Israel paid undisclosed damages to Bouchikhi's family, but refused to admit responsibility for the killing.

Mossad is thought to have struck again in October 1995, when the head of the Palestinian militant group Islamic Jihad, Fathi al-Shikai, was gunned down on the streets of Malta. The hit, though never formally claimed, had all the trademarks of the agency. A return to such killings is expected to raise concerns among Israel's Western allies.

The assassinations are likely to be carried out by a unit of Mossad's secret Metsada department called the Kidon, a Hebrew word meaning "bayonet". The agents will have to answer to Mr Dagan, who has been described by a CIA agent as having a "real killer instinct". Officially, Israel has refused to confirm or deny the policy change. Kim Farber, a diplomat at the Israeli Embassy in Washington, told UPI: "There is so little information available on this, there is nothing I can add."



   am 19. Dezember 2005

Quick summary:

Austrian politician, John Gudenus retired on 4 November 2005 but that will not protect him from criminal prosecution under Section 3 h of the notorious Austrian criminal code that prohibits anyone from denying or minimizing National Socialist crimes, and punishes such behaviour with one to ten years prison. Similar allegations have been brought against David Irving whose trial will begin in Vienna in February 2006.

At the end of April 2005 Gudenus stated in a television interview that the existence of the homicidal gas chambers should be “physically and scientifically investigated”. On 29 June 2005 the Austrian parliament stripped Gudenus of his immunity from prosecution. On 14 September 2005, during a visit to the concentration camp Mauthausen he had commented that on some photographs the inmates “looked good” while he looked far worse. This was literally the final straw for the public prosecutor and proceedings were begun against Gudenus.         

Wiederbetätigungsprozess gegen Gudenus

Nach dem britischen Holocaust-Leugner David Irving wird sich auch der ehemalige FPÖ-Bundesrat John Gudenus wegen nationalsozialistischer Wiederbetätigung im Wiener Straflandesgericht verantworten müssen. Wie die APA am Montagnachmittag aus gut informierten Justiz-Kreisen erfuhr, hat das Justizministerium einen entsprechenden Vorhabensbericht der Staatsanwaltschaft Wien genehmigt.

Der Akt mit der "abgesegneten" Anklageschrift gegen den mittlerweile pensionierten Politiker - Gudenus hat

am 4. November seine Abschiedsrede in der Länderkammer gehalten - ist nun wieder am Weg zurück zur Staatsanwaltschaft.

Am Montagnachmittag war er dort noch nicht eingelangt, weshalb es seitens der Anklagebehörde keine offizielle Stellungnahme zur Causa Gudenus gab.

Auch das Justizministerium hielt sich bedeckt. Er könne dazu nichts sagen, damit Gudenus die getroffene Entscheidung nicht aus den Medien erfahre, erklärte der zuständige Sektionschef Werner Pürstl gegenüber der APA.

Fest steht, dass der mit dieser Sache betraute U-Richter dem früheren Bundesrat noch vor Weihnachten die Anklageschrift zustellen wird. Gudenus hat dann 14 Tage Zeit, diese zu studieren und allenfalls dagegen Einspruch anzumelden. Sobald die Anklage in Rechtskraft erwachsen ist, wird im Grauen Haus ein Richter bestimmt, der die Hauptverhandlung leiten wird. Der Prozess dürfte im kommendem Frühjahr stattfinden.

John Gudenus hatte Ende April in der ORF-Sendung "Report" verlangt, man sollte die Existenz von Gaskammern im Dritten Reich "physikalisch und wissenschaftlich prüfen". Mit weiteren umstrittenen Aussagen ("Es gab Gaskammern, aber nicht im Dritten Reich. Sondern in Polen. So steht es auch in Schulbüchern") sorgte er für beträchtliches Aufsehen und scharfe Proteste. Am 29. Juni hob der Wiener Landtag, von dem er als Ländervertreter ins Hohe Haus entsandt worden war, seine Immunität auf.

Am 14. September wurde Gudenus auf Ersuchen der Staatsanwaltschaft ein zweites Mal ausgeliefert: Bei einem Besuch in der KZ-Gedenkstätte Mauthausen hatte er laut einem Protokoll des Innenministeriums erklärt, auf einem Foto abgebildete jugendliche Häftlinge würden - bezogen auf ihren körperlichen Zustand - "eigentlich ganz gut aussehen", während er selbst "schlechter aussehe". Die Staatsanwaltschaft begann darauf hin wegen des Verdachts auf Verstoß gegen den Paragrafen 3 h des Verbotsgesetzes zu ermitteln, der das Leugnen oder Verharmlosen von NS-Verbrechen unter Strafe stellt. Nach dieser Gesetzesstelle wird bestraft, "wer in einem Druckwerk, im Rundfunk oder in einem anderen Medium bzw. öffentlich auf eine Weise, dass es vielen Menschen zugänglich wird, den nationalsozialistischen Völkermord oder andere nationalsozialistische Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit leugnet, gröblich verharmlost, gutheißt oder zu rechtfertigen sucht." Strafrahmen: Ein bis zehn Jahre Haft.


David Brockschmidt corrects an obvious ambassadorial fiddle with historical truth

Austria and the Jews - From the Austrian Ambassador, The Spectator, 10 December 2005

Sir: In Austria it is illegal publicly to deny the Holocaust (‘Let Irving speak’, 3 December). ‘Words are deeds’, said Sigmund Freud, and in Austria we are aware of this connection.

‘There is no more anti-Semitic nation in western Europe than Austria’? Neither the report on ‘Manifestations of anti-Semitism in the EU, 2002-2003’ by the EU Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia, nor the recent study by the Anti-Defamation League ‘On attitudes towards Jews in 12 European countries’ corroborates this claim.

It is true and shameful that many Austrians participated in the Holocaust. Was this guilt ‘extraordinary’? A relatively greater number of Austrian Jews survived than did Jews in several other European countries. Was the Holocaust ignored by the Austrian government after 1945? The vast majority of its members had been prisoners of the Nazis. Very strict anti-Nazi laws were soon passed, former Nazis were excluded from public life for years, and many (about 136,000), though far from enough, were prosecuted. About 30,000 were brought to Austrian courts and 13, 600 were sentenced, 43 to death, in the first years after 1945. Restitution on the basis of Austrian laws also started shortly after the war, but there again too little was done and often too late. Renewed efforts to compensate victims were made in recent years. Unsatisfactory as it all is, does it amount to Austria pretending the responsibility resided solely in Berlin?

“Hitler himself was Austrian”. What kind of argument is this? Mozart and Wittgenstein were also Austrians. Stalin was Georgian. Neither Hitler nor Stalin rose to power in their native lands. Hitler left Austria in 1913, at the age of 24, and wrote Mein Kampf, in a German prison.

Why did German troops (100,000) and police (16,000) enter Austria on 11 March 1938? Why not on 5 or 23 March? To prevent a plebiscite scheduled for 13 March on whether Austrians wanted to join Germany or not. The Austrian government launched a massive campaign for independence. The Austrian Jewish community issued an appeal in favour, arguing, that as long as Austria exists Jews would not be in danger.

What would Rod Liddle have written if “the anti-Semitic [Austrian] nation’ had ignored its own laws and let Irving speak to ‘wacko right-wing Austrian students’? Well, you can’t win this one.

Gabriele Matzner-Holzer, Austrian Embassy, London SW1.

Response from David Brockschmidt, Adelaide

In regard to the Austrian Ambassador to the UK, Gabrielle Matzner-Holzner’s letter, ‘Austria and the Jews’, The Spectator, 10 December 2005,. I would like to protest on her attack on freedom of speech.

Frau Matzner-Holzer is wrong here saying that the German government prevented citizens of Austria from holding a plebiscite in order to decide if they wanted to become part of the German Reich or not.

The plebiscite took place as planned by the Austrian government on 13 March 1938: Subsequently and following proper registration of Austria’s voting population elections were held throughout Germany and Austria in order that those populations be given the opportunity to approve or reject German-Austrian unity. On 13 March 1938 the Austrian government enacted a constitutional law concerning a plebiscite for the re-union of Austria with the Third Reich. On 18 March 1938 Hitler dissolved the Reichstag and announced conformity with the plebiscite which was announced on 10 April 1938. The peoples of both nations were to be given the opportunity to decide for or against unification with Hitler’s Germany.

Austria: The Election Results

Entitled to vote: 4,474, 138

Actual Vote: 4,460, 778

Total Valid Votes: 4,455, 015

Votes in favour of unification: 4,443,208

Votes against unification: 11,807

Spoilt Papers: 5,763

Germany: The Election Results

Entitled to vote: 45,073,303

Actual Vote: 44,872,702

Total Valid Votes: 44,803,096

Votes in favour of unification: 44,362,667

Votes against unification: 440,429

Spoilt Papers: 69,606

British writer, Gordon Brook-Shepherd stated: “Most foreign observers present in Vienna that day accepted that the polling had been free from any opinion intimidation.”

Contrary to Communist elections, where you vote for an open list, the votes in Germany and Austria were secret ballots.

It would have been much better to let the distinguished British historian, David Irving speak not only to the ‘wacko right-wing’ students in Vienna, but to the whole Austrian population. Instead this brilliant man, David Irving, is now a political prisoner in the “Democratic People’s Republic of Austria”. Perhaps Stalin was right after all by saying, “Democracy fits the Germans, and Austrians like the saddle to the cow.”

Well, you can’t win this one, Frau Matzner-Holzer, right?



Patrick H McNalley: Mini-Essays


1. The Turkish and German Holocaust Trials

Amazing that advanced nations [indoor toilets, hot running water] like both Turkey and German are simultaneously embroiled in imbecilic holocaust criminal trials. Don't they have universities and research institutes where quasi-rational people can take a crack at figuring out the past? Give a group of academic nerds a modest salary, a huge coffee budget, several years and they will come up with something, if the goodies are not stacked too much in favor of one pre-ordained politically correct conclusion.

Criminal law is not the framework and criminal lawyers are not the people to be pontificating  about historical issues. We have enough dangerous real criminals that should be incarcerated. Enough traitors to be arrested and deported! At one time in the USA, divorce could only be fought out in the courts. Then they started "no fault divorce." We need "no fault" holocaust-hoaxoco$t disputes. No more government mandated imprisonment to silence truth seekers, historians, and normal humans who like to talk and inquire.

The Turkish government's criminal case is defending Turkish national self-identity against Turks who affirm an Armenian holocaust. However, the Jewish Occupation Government [JOG] in Germany is attacking German national self-identity against Germans who deny the fictional Jewish holocaust. Germar Rudolf said that Germans can do a very good job of persecuting themselves and no longer need Jews to do it for them. Perhaps the courageous chemist underestimated the evil machinations of elite Jewry.

Poor Germany! Once the land of poets and thinkers, its government has been reduced to a lapdog for the Jew elite and a rabies-infected mad dog against its own people. Now any German who wants to assert the traditional national cultural self-identity can do it only in foreign exile or German prison.

2. Know thy Enemy! Read the Talmud!

Socrates said, "Know thyself!...The unexamined life is not worth living." Sounds like good advice, but the witty Jew pedophile, Woody Allen, warningly quipped, "Just because you're paranoid does not mean that nobody is following you." Consequently, it is difficult and even dangerous to exclusively pursue Socratic self-knowledge when Talmud psychos are out to relieve you of all your bodily goods, political safety, and even your very life.

Reading a few pages of this filthiest of all books would end all the pollyannish fantasies about a putative Judeo-Christian tradition. The Talmud boasts that Jews did kill Jesus and that he is now in hell boiling away in excrement and semen. Mary, his mother, was a whore who had sexual intercourse with animals. Does "Judeo-Christian" only mean that gullible Christians should serve as foot soldiers in Judaism's war against Islam and then be silent as Judaism finishes the job of deleting the few remaining traces of Christianity from public life? Isn't it incredible that Christian soldiers would die in Israel's war against Iraq and that ACLU Jews would demand that Christmas signs be removed from privately owned MacDonalds restaurants? I am just asking because I am not a Christian and do not eat in MacDonalds. P.T. Barnum was right in saying that nobody ever went broke over-estimating the stupidity of the American people.

The Talmud - more than anything - exposes the Jewish elite's hypocritical pretense that they have any committment to the Enlightenment values of open debate, democracy, separation of religion and politics, and universal human values. All the philosophical viewpoints found in the much maligned "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" came out of the Talmud. The Jewish elite should disown and attack the Talmud before Gentiles start to study it.

The top-dog Jews are an enemy state within any and all Gentile states unfortunate enough to have such a cohesive fifth column of traitors. However, the wise words of the Iranian head of state fall on deaf ears because Western peoples have been brainwashed into fighting for their enemy.

3. Jews' Power Makes Stupid Jews

Nietzsche incisively observed, "Power makes stupid." That maxim focuses on the brain, but Lord Acton's statement ["Power tends to corrupt. Absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely."] focuses on the moral. At any rate, the clout of the Jew elite has grown exponentially since the days in 1916 when a handful of conniving zio-traitors could secretly blackmail the UAssA president into World War II and thus get the Jew fifth columnists their ballyhooed Balfour Declaration.

Today a bold-faced liar and hate monger like Alley Weasel, a flatulent gasbag and war criminal like Henry Kissinger, and a fork-tongued hypocrite like Shimon Peres can walk off with Nobel Peace Prizes. How about one for Saddam Hussein? Or a joint one for Baby Bush and Saddam because the two of them presided over the dismantling of Iraq, just like Peres-Arafat and Kissinger-Le Doc Tho presided over the end of criminal and genocidal attacks on a victim people. OK! I forgot Baby Bush is not a Jew, so he would not qualify.

J.J. Goldberg wrote a fascinating book, "Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment." It is a good read to sober up the naive who associate the Jewish elite with Nathans the Wise, Einsteins, and Heinrich Heines. Today's elite Jewry has just raw political power, truckloads of money, and no human morality whatsoever supporting its Zionist Occupation Government [ZOG] running and ruining the UAssA.  Surprising that so many of the Zionist elite are junk dealers, porno pushers, and denizens of the world of organized crime.

However, each success in duping the gullible goyim just give them more relative power in a weakened body politic and so they end up with less absolute power and awakened resistance from their Gentile victims. It is elite Jewry's centuries old story of the diaspora experience's vicious cycle: intial acceptance by goyim [Hello, Jews!]; growing Jewish elite prosperity; Talmud-inspired betrayal of the Gentile host culture; goyim disgust, resistance, and expulsion of Jews [Good riddance!].

4. Prison Time for Elite Jewry's Holocaust Liars!

The great Israel Shamir described the joosmedia as a Stealth Bomber that never appears on anyone's radar screen. Elite Jewry can attack anybody, but nobody can counter-attack elite Jewry. That elite's ability to censor out any opposing viewpoints has distorted public discourse so much, that their most outrageous lies are now the politically correct "truth" and the use of simple arithmetic applied to holocaust fables is criminal behaviour punishable by prison sentences. Go figure!

The Jewish elite has completely trashed the Modern European Enlightenment position that free speech is a most basic human right. Apparently, homosexual marriage has become a more fundamental right than free expression of one's convictions. Should not homosexual wedlock and holocaust revisionism be at least equally important? If it is acceptable to deny God's existence, why not be able to deny the holocaust? Is the holocaust more important than God? Apparently so!

But the craven cowardice of American academics, intellectuals, and pseudo-intellectuals is the most disgusting aspect of the sad spectacle of Jewry's neo-Inquisition against the feeble remnants of the Voltairean stance of defending others' free speech even if one disagrees with the content. Spineless professors do not even have the backbone and gumption to investigate and see if they agree with the imprisoned holocaust revisionists or not. Instead they simply take their opinions from safe and acceptable leftgatekeepers like Numb Chumsky and Steven Spielberg and join the sheeple in passive silence.

Great social critics of the past like Mark Twain and H.L. Mencken would heap mountains of scorn, contempt, and defiance on the pious pontifications and self-serving lies of schmaltzy, hate-mongering moral dwarfs like Alley Weasel and Sly Weaseltal. Whatever happened to our sense of humor and self-respect? Maybe we had just better forget the Enlightenment now that our JOG [Jewish Occupation Government] has liberated us from our Bill of Rights and given us the PATRIOT Act [written and administrated by our joodiciary]. [PATRIOT = Pathetic Asshole Traitors Revenging Independent and Opposed Thought]

But there is another relevant legal principle available to defend human dignity and self-respect. That is the common law right to defend oneself against libel and slander. Voltaire's defense of free speech does not include a putative right to tell lies about other humans. The hoaxoco$t fable is history's most outrageous and gross blood libel against Gentiles in general, the German people in particular, and most specifically the families of innumerable Germans caught up in the web of elite Jewry's lies.

ACLU Jews make a big deal of getting certain long-past criminal judgments reversed, e.g. Leo Frank's conviction for murdering a young girl in Georgia in the early 20th Century. Fair enough! Germans have to imitate ACLU Jews by getting the early Hoaxoco$t show trial convictions reversed because they were based on torture of witnessess, forged testimony and allied revenge. The allies' chutzpah in setting themselves up as the judge, jury, prosecutor, legislator, and sole approved witness is incredible. After getting the Nuremburg kangaroo courts judgments reversed, it would then be time to move onto libel suits against the hollowco$t heavies and jail time for the perjury of the well-fed professional prevaricators and actors perpetrating the "hoax of the century."

In between the extremes of Christian forgiveness and Jewish revenge, there is the common sense legal and moral principle of justice as fairness. A German prisoner of conscience summed it up by saying: "If elite Jewry will stop telling lies about us, we will stop telling the truth about them."

5. Elite Jewry and its Solomon Sixpackers

Plato and Aristotle thought a lot about various possible good and bad political, legal, and social arrangements and paid great attention to the conflicts within societies. They both thought that these arrangements were very important for humans' happiness, although their premises and conclusions were rather different. In contrast to the great Greeks, the political ideas of Moses, Nehemiah, and the Talmud seem positively childish, outlandishly one-dimensional, and psychotically rigid.

The Torah's list of 613 rules is a good strait jacket to keep the sheep in line, but it does seem a little bizarre to imagine that any universal, eternal, transcendental God would be passionately interested in whether or not you ate shrimp or non-kosher Big Macs.  Rather than getting lost in such detailed rules that Jews themselves do not and could not realistically follow, let us focus on some huge, unbridgeable chasms between this strange Judaic tradition and the great Gentile thought of the Ancient Greeks.

The Greeks gave us the option of changing the rules. The Judaic elite forbade their Solomon Sixpackers from making such changes because everything was supposedly dictated by G-d. The Greeks made each society responsible for its actions, policies, and their consequences. The Jews put the onus and responsibility onto some transcendental fig newton deity who has a quasi-sexual fetish about his favorite tribe. The Greeks wrote about human nature. The Jews wrote about Jooish divinity as a people apart and above and beyond merely human all-too-human humans. The Greeks thought that  the greatest dangers for humans would come from their own leaders. The Jews turned their own leaders into God's ventriloquists whose pronouncements had to be obeyed.

The pathetic short-sightedness of this Jewish bigotry is that the Solomon Sixpackers have never been able to understand the ABCs of Gentile political wisdom and, consequently, the Jewish elite-priesthood-plutocracy can lead their Leonard Lunchboxers by the nose into the worst disasters. For example, the crackpot zio-elite betrayed Germany in WWI and started WWII. All that was very bad for the Sixpackers and Lunchboxers living in East European ghettos, but the Self-Chosens' Self-Chosen modern wannabe Moseses wanted to lead them into the new Self-Promised Land of Zion and did not care how many died in the desert or even whether they wanted to go to Zion.

The best, most recent, and clearest example of the divergence between the interests of the elite Talmud  Pharisaic priest/plutocrats and the dumb as doggy dodo Sixpackers is the hoaxoco$t fairy tale. Perhaps Mr. and Mrs. Lunchboxers derive some vicarious sado-masochistic pleasure at their imagined hollowco$t  victimhood, but the "holocaust industrialists" and the hoaxoco$t jet setters are a small subset of the Jewish people. In fact, most of the victims of elite Jewry's shakedown of the Swiss banks were Jews who expected some payout for their time spent at the Awshucks Labor Camp. After the top-of-the-food-chain embezzlers took their fees, commissions,  expenses, the Sixpackers got zilch. Following this shameless scam was there a loud outcry from the Jewish street against their deceitful misleadership? Not a peep!

All of Jewry [secular and religious! plutocrat and pauper! Ph.D. and trash dealer!] seems to be a humongous moral, mental, political, and social ghetto. Jews build all sorts of walls around themselves to keep up their fragile sense of superiority and ward off the less-than-human Gentile. The Wall now being built in Izrealhell at Gentile expense epitomizes the Jewish outlook You can get the Jew out of the ghetto, but not the ghetto out of the Jew.

6. The Impossibility of Holocaust "Eye-witnesses"

If someone swore up and down that they eye-witnessed the cruxifixion of Jesus and the burning of Joan of Arc, we could legitimately demand proof that they were alive at those different times. If someone claimed to have eye-witnessed the Pearl Harbor attack and the Nazi tanks near Moscow on the same day at the same hour, we could justifiably demand proof that they had bilocation capability. But it is politically incorrect and socially impolite to raise these problems of space and time when supposed eye-witnesses claim to have "eye-witnessed the holocaust."

The holocaust story raises insurmountable issues of space and time for putative eye-witnesses because no single human could possible have witnessed the murder of 6,000,000. Assuming the holocaust started in January, 1942 and ended in January, 1945 with the liberation of Auschwitz, our wannabe witness would have to have eye-witnessed c. 5480 murders a day on average. Double-counting of victims by multiple witnesses would be a big problem to the extent that such eye-witnesses constituted the case for the holocaust.

Serious crimes require serious evidence. The big paradox with the holocaust is that it is very easy to get lots of forensic evidence relating to the crime, but the holocaust prophets-profits fight tooth and nail against gathering any conclusive forensic evidence, i.e. jail time or death threats for investigators going to the Auschwitz Labor Camp to gather forensic evidence Their attitude can be contrasted to the actions of the American government after 9-11, when the USA central police authorities quickly destroyed masses of possible forensic evidence for the obvious crime because they wanted to prevent any investigation leading to the real perpetrators. The holocaust affirmers have not destroyed any evidence because there was none to destroy because there was no holocaust crime.

Belief in the holocaust is epistemologically similar to belief in the resurrection of Jesus, i.e. both beliefs are irrefutable, but substantive forensic evidence is needed to support accusations that crimes have been committed. It is not enough for holocaust affirmers to argue that their accusations cannot be refuted. They must end their witch trial tactics and address the issues raised by revisionists. If they cannot or will not do that, they should be sued for libel and forced to pay damages.

7. Alley Weasel and Other Moral Masturbaters

Sly Weaselthal, the West Coast heavyweight hate mongering holocaustomaniac, recently made a good career move by kicking the bucket. The Ancient Romans said, "About the dead say nothing but good!" So Sly rather preempted any pointed exposure of his outrageous lies and made himself immune to refutation. But Alley Weasel, the East Coast champion hoaxohuckster, is still fair game and awaits "deconstruction," an academically fashionable and pompous word to describe what the child did who pointed to the universally respected emperor and said, "But he has no clothes."

Alley is one humongous living lie, in fact, the most monstrous and shabbiest lie ever concocted. The colossal success of the "hoax of the century" [actually "blood libel of the millennia"] proves the truth of P.T. Barnum's maxim, "Nobody ever went broke overestimating the stupidity of the American people." And Barnum's wisdom must now be supplemented with, "Nobody ever went broke overestimating the cowardice of the American people."

How could such a sewer trout like Alley ever swim so far upstream into the USA's ideologico-political system to become the quasi-official court preacher for the neo-religion of Holocaustianity? This is the new fake religion of Judaic revenge and racism designed to browbeat and dominate the gullible goyim and especially the Jewish sheeple at the bottom of the Jewish Supremacist hierarchy.

The logical and scientific analyses of Faurisson, Butz, Mattogno, Rudolf, et al. seem like arrows, bullets, and hand grenades attacking a creeping cloud of poisonous gas. The holocaust industrialists arrogantly dismiss their findings and imprison, exile, assault and batter, or totally ignore their arguments. The holocaust believers sheepishly follow their brainwashers' cues. Of course, the Faurisson et al. approach is a wake up call and shock to anyone still at all influenced by Enlightenment values of rationality and open debate, but our Jewish Occupation Governments [JOGs] seem to have dragged us back into a new Dark Age of witch trials, religious Inquisitions, and the PATRIOT [Pathetic Asshole Traitors Revenging Independent and Opposing Thoughts] Act. So read Germar Rudolf's "Lectures on the Holocaust" to persuade fence sitters but don't waste time arguing with holocaustomaniacs?

Nietzsche said that you cannot use reason, logic, and science to dissuade people who did not acquire their beliefs by reason, logic, or science. So in such cases he recommended laughter, derision, scorn, etc. Enough of holocaust revision! It is time for holocaust derision. No more sceptical, laid-back holocaust denial, but a raucous, joyous, Dionysian hoaxoco$t affirmation. The hollowco$t is the biggest and sickest joke and just sitting there inviting deholyhoaxotoxification through laughter.

"Brainwashed of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your delusions!"

8. Spielberg's Viciously Anti-Semitistic Movie, "Munich"

Steven Spielberg has established himself as Hollywood's most pretigious wannabe historian, political pop-philosopher, and hoaxoco$t huckster. His pseudo-documentary, "Swindler's List," set a new low for slick deceit and flatout lying. But the movie's one interesting feature was that the only character with an backbone was Oskar the Goy. Why did the Jews' elite promote that movie since all the Jews were shown as passive cowards?

"Saving Private Ryan" was much slicker propaganda in terms of placating the goyim and only throwing in here and there a few fictive side tales about "the enormous Jewish contribution" to fighting in the war the Jews' elite itself started. But Spielberg made one major faux pas at the very end when Saved Private Ryan -now Senior Citizen Ryan- visits the cemetery for Normandy's war dead. The camera panned over rows on rows and fields on fields of Christian crosses but barely a Star of David in sight. Israel Shamir commented that certain elite Jews want to get all those cemeteries bulldozed so the Christian role is not so obvious. But Jewish Supremacists should be proud that they got and get so many stupid goyim to die in their wars. The Christians should be ashamed of their losses in past and present Jewish wars.

"Munich" is viciously anti-Semitistic [against Jewish Supremacy] because it treats Jews as normal human beings whose drive for revenge can start a vicious downward spiral into guilt, paranoia, and [Oiy veh!] loss of faith in Zionism and Israel. David Brooks [review in the "New York Times"] stupidly claimed that Spielberg left evil out of "Munich." By "evil" the joosmedia always means some Gentile phenomenon. There supposedly cannot be any really Jewish evil. Just honest Jewish mistakes or overly zealous Judaic idealism! Brooks' bigotry prevents him from seeing the Jewish core evil of racist revenge, but Spielberg made this Jewish evil the central theme of his movie.

One of the most pathetically asinine teachings in all of Jewdayism is the notion of Amalek, i.e. a small tribe mentioned in the account of the Self-Chosens' desert wanderings. Jews are instructed to take revenge against this tribe for something or other it did some 4,000 years ago to insult the Self-Chosen. The bizarre thing is that today's Pharisaic rabbis discuss whether this or that European nation is Amalek. Spielberg has gotten far beyond that asininity with "Munich." And precisely that makes his movie anti-Semitistic because Semitists [Jewish Supremacists] need revenge for real or imagined insults as the core value holding the Jewish sheeple together.

"Munich" seems very similar to Victor Ostorvsky's book, "By Way of Deception." Both Spielberg's movie and Ostrovsky's book cast doubt on the core Judaic value of chronic and disproportional revenge. For Buddha and Jesus, revenge is a terrible moral evil and the destroyer of peace, spiritual tranquillity, and human societies. Nietzsche pointed to the same problem of revenge as evil when he suggested that the main cause of wars is that people study history too much. So it is no accident that war-mongers like Alley Weasel constantly talk of memory and justice when they really mean revenge for crimes that were never even committed against them.

9. Expulsion of Jews? or Enslavement by Jews?

Paul Johnson wrote a fascinating one-volume birds'-eye-view "History of the Jews." The book is interesting because it combines the obligatory politically correct Judeolatry [Jew worship] with numerous incidents showing Jewry's dark side. But actually in that, his book is very much like the Old Testament which depicts Jewry as stiff-necked, bone-headed, genocidally racist, but still G-d loves them oh! so dearly and is just so sad that his darling tribe are such incorrigible sphincters. A god so prone to favorites should have chosen the Ancient Greeks and his only excuse is that that god does not exist.

The recurring pattern in Johnson's Jewish history involves: 1.) a pseudo-assimilationist thriving in a Gentile host culture, 2.) the tribe's inability to restrain a Talmud-inspired rampant graspiness for politico-economic power, 3.) Gentile exasperation with and expulsion of the Self-Chosen, 4.) migration into a new host and repetition of the pattern. This pattern began way back when the shifty Abraham told the natives of Canaan that he merely wanted to buy a burial ground for his family in Hebropn. But he did not tell the sellers that God, the Great Real Estate Developer in the Sky, had actually given him title in fee simple to the whole frigging country and far beyond. That is the great thing about being self-chosen: whatever you want is yours! But what kind of psycho could thing that the purchase of a small private plot grants full political sovereignity in perpetuity over an entire region? Only a zio-psycho!

Nietzsche pointed to the pseudo-assimilationist nature of elite Jewish behavior when he said that Jews are Europe's greatest actors, i.e. on and off stage. Off stage they can pretend to be Germans, Frenchmen, Russians, et cet ad infinitum. If the excrement hits the fan in a given country, a Jew, e.g. Henry Kissinger, can wipe off the blowback, migrate, and become a fake American patriot but genuine war criminal. Nietzsche pointed to the Talmud-based graspiness when he said that Jews are world history's greatest haters whose core virtue is revenge. This is the same Nietzsche who often proffers the most ridiculous, unfounded philo-Semitic [pro-Jew] nonsense So nobody can reasonably argue that Frederick Wilhelm is an auntie-Semenist.

But for the simple, ordinary un-chosen goyim there is one ominous kink-exception in Johnson's pattern, i.e. sometimes Jewry's graspiness is successful at attaining supreme political power and Jewish Supremacists enslave Gentiles for a while. Examples: In the 7th Century when the Christian Byzantine Empire lost control of Palestine to the Persian Empire and Jews obtained the freedom to murder 6,900,000 Christians in homocidal gas chambers. [OK, I added a few zeroes and threw in the gas chambers story just for dramatic effect. Am I the first one to do such a thing???]

In the 11th Century, Khazar Jewry ruled over non-Jews who got sick and tired of Jewish chutzpah and oppression and let the country and government collapse. Khazar Jewry then wandered north into the deep freeze of the future Yiddish East Europe. These two examples are found in the writings of Israel Shamir. In particular, please read his thought provoking essay, "Nincompoop" about Baby Bush and the AshcanNazis.

Today's post-industrial cyber-slavery is very different from the Old Plantation style with its clearly visible bullwhips and identifiable Uncle Toms. The magnificent "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" describes in detail the techniques of modern enslavement:

1. phoney elections; [ zio-stooge Bush vs. zio-stooge Al Bore, Kerry/Kohen], 2. joosmedia control of discourse; [endless scandals of homosexual priests], 3. fake social issues; [homosexual marriages and adoptions], 4. media induced hatred; [anti-Arab hysteria and anti-Muslim lies], 5. fake foreign threats; [Iraq, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, God-knows-where-next], 6. phoney foreign friends to bankrupt and back stab us [ISRAEL] 7. socially destructive government policies; [deindustrializing free trade = reverse mercantilism, borderless open borders, socialism for the rich, free enterprise for the poor], 8. pseudo-schooling; [great buses, harassed teachers, few books, no computers, bullshit "feel good" curricula, high schools as team sports feeders for college and pro leagues, "no child left behind" = no child out in front], 9. complete holocaustofication of public discourse; [ hoaxoco$t "education," hollowcost movies, holyhoax Chanakah, hoaxoco$tianity tax-supported museums, hoaxoholiday of the month]

What has the USA become? Unfree Stupid Asses? Land of the Free? of the Freak? Home of the Brave? of the Knave? Maybe a ZOG-HOG? [Zionist Occupied Government-Holocaust Obsessed Government

10. Jewry's Need to Exterminate Holocaustorians

No power elite will willingly give up its privileges, dominance and wealth [MAJOR PREMISE]. Elites like the Ancient Roman Emperors, Medieval Popes, or the Soviet Union's nomenklatura always used an idealistic facade or "holy lie" as the front line of self-defense. They also had armies, secret police, and even torture instruments to intimidate any outspoken free thinkers, eg. in Brecht's play the pope only has to have the torture instruments shown to Galileo to have him recant his convictions.

Today's elite USA Jewry is a power elite [MINOR PREMISE]. It has complete control of public discourse but not yet a secret police. The American booboisie is uneasy about embracing the PATRIOT [Psychotic Asinine Traitors Revenging Independent and Opposing Thinking] Act. But Jewry knows that it must stop the sceptical scientific inquiries of holocaustorians or the whole hoaxoco$t lie will go up in smoke. And the Auschwitz Lie is the visible keystone of elite Jewry's power and their most important privilege, i.e. their right to tell "holy lies."

Notate bene: "Auschwitz Lie" here means the unfounded fable that Auschwitz was a death camp with homocidal gas chambers. In German "Auschwitz Luge" means exactly the opposite, i.e. the reasonable claim that Auschwitz was only a forced labor camp with insecticidal gas chambers to save Jewish lives.

Therefore, elite USA Jewry will not willingly give up its key privilege, i.e. the holocaust fable [CONCLUSION]. That is why it runs frantically around the world rating governments, heads of state, and even peoples on a Holocaust Acceptance Scale [HAS]. Holocaust insane Israel and Holocaust Obsessed Germany [HOG] have perfect ratings because they scour the earth for anyone they can get deported back to their jewdiciaries for a kangaroo court show trial right out of the age of the witch hunts. Canada and the USA are far down on the scale because they allow their native born subjects to sound off about the hoaxoco$t and do not imprison them yet. They only deport the foreign born. But Jewry sees that as a terrible violation of human rights, i.e Jewish privileges, and wants to criminalize un-holocaust deeds, words, and thoughts. Soon the UAssA will get a Un-Holocaust Activities Committee. At the very bottom of HAS and even off the scale are Iran and those countries whose presidents even scoff at the whole shabby scam of the hollowcost.

Interrupt for a news break: New Orleans has been flooded and soon all of Lousyanna will be en-Gulfed? "Forget it! The Iranian president just denied the holocaust. Roll out the B-52s and nuke the guy's country!" The USA has the lowest achievement scores for students in the industrialized world? "OK! They need holocaust re-education programs to beef up their skills and make them internationally competitve in hoaxoco$tology, a new field soon to offer Nobel Prizes."

Elite Jewry is very experienced and talented at mouthing the platitudes and plongitudes that the modern goyim suckers love to hear: human rats [Jimmy Carter's pronunciation], freedumb [Baby Bush's], Judo-Christianity [Colon Bowel's], dumbmocracy [most any political stooge], but Jewry's dominant rabbinal mentality is right out of the Spanish Inquisition. In fact, Israel Shahak reports in his small gem of a book, "Jewish History - Jewish Religion," that Spanish Jews established the first Inquisition to keep the Jewish sheeple in line. It was 100 years later that the Christians copied them.

The verbiage of the Modern European Enlightenment is only a sheep's skin costume that the raging, racist wolf of elite Jewry puts on to fool their own sheeple and their cattle-goyim. Now that they have grabbed power and no longer need Enlightenment values, Jewish plagiarizers, gasbags, and moral dwarfs like Alan Dershowitz, Charles Krauthammer, et al. santimoniously talk about the necessity and value of torturing Gentiles. When they talk of torturing information out of AIPAC traitors, I will take these moral big mouths seriously.

11. O.J. Simpson and the Holocaust

Did O.J. murder his wife? There were fervent advocates on both sides of the question. But those who argued "No" were never accused of saying that O.J. had been the perfect husband or that O.J. never threatened or beat his wife. All disputants knew that the sole issue was the matter of murder. Among those who argued "No," there was nobody who tried make O.J. out to be a Mother Teresa. Would that holocaust discussions were carried on in so clearly and well defined a manner! But holocaust deniers are often illogically accused of asserting that Jews did not suffer at all and/or of defending the Nazis. Such accusations are just rhetorical tricks and logical fallacies designed to derail the analysis of the holocaust.

The holocaust narration accuses some Germans of a most serious crime. Only the most rabid Jewish racists like Alley Weasel and Daniel Goldhagen state that all Germans were and are somehow still implicated. If the accusation is true, there should be serious consequences for any justly and fairly convicted criminal murderers. If the accusation is false, there should be serious consequences for the criminal libelers. Making accusations like the holocaust cannot be something with only upside risks of positive payoffs. But to my knowledge nobody has yet even mentioned the obvious downside risks of committing such a monstrous blood libel, i.e. if the holocaust narrative should turn out to be a deliberate hoax and filthy lie.

At this point, I assume that the holocaust story can be proven true or refuted. It is not the case that the result will be unknown or indeterminable. Moreover, any previous trials at which the holocaust was a central issue have to be looked at to determine if convictions were based on torture, the threat of torture, or blackmail of either the defendants or witnesses. It might turn out that some defendants got the choice of turning states' witness and thereby avoiding torture and imprisonment.

QUESTION: In the holocaust who did what to whom where, when, and how?

ANSWER AND INDICTMENT: Some Germans murdered 6,000,000 Jews in Europe between 1941 and 1945 by using mainly homocidal gas chambers. [This has been paraphrased from the quasi-official "Holocaust Encyclopedia."] The crux of the indictment is the phrase "murdered 6,000,000." By the time that that will been proved the other issues would have been proved.

Now millions of Japanese and Germans were killed as the American Air Force firebombed its way up and down and back and forth across the civilian population areas of those two countries. But virtually nobody says that the unfortunate Japanese and Germans were "murdered." They merely "died" or were "killed." Arthur Butz ironically quipped that during World War II a war was going on. During wars people die, bad things happen. TENTATIVE BUT REBUTTABLE CONCLUSION: However many Jews lost their lives during WWII, they were not murdered. They simply died, just like their fellow Germans and Japanese. The German SS did not want to kill the Jews but wanted to use them as forced labor. Why transport them all the way from Holland to Poland to murder them? Just murder them in Holland! Why have a swimming pool, a theater, a whore house, and a soccer field within the Auschwitz Main Camp? Perhaps the Germans were more humane than the Soviets in running forced labor camps.

The most basic issue about the holocaust is that it must be seen as a researchable, provable, and refutable historical event. It cannot merely be a partisan quasi-religious belief or divinely revealed tribal dogma not subject to dispassionate analysis. An independent international commission of neutral parties, e.g. Mongolians, Eskimos, Fiji Islanders, etc. should be set up to study the origins, costs, and consequences of the holocaust both as historical event and an ideological narrative. It is simply bizarre that one party [which happens to be the putative victim and unquestioned post-WWII beneficiary of the holocaust] should be the sole judge, jury, law-giver, prosecutor, plaintiff, news media source, historian, and final court of appeal in adjudicating and even discussing the holocaust.



Editorial: Awful denial of Holocaust, A Cap Times editorial, December 28, 2005

First it was the new president of Iran. Now it's the leader of the main opposition party in Egypt. Both are claiming that the Holocaust, which claimed the lives of 6 million Jews, is nothing more than a myth.

This is very dangerous talk. It deserves the strongest rebuttals possible not only by Western governments, but by Arab governments as well. It also deserves notice from people in this country who think those who deny the reality of the Holocaust are just some kind of fringe element.

Talk to the people who have survived the Nazi concentration camps and it is hard to image anyone reducing the horror they experienced to some kind of a made-up story. Talk to the American soldiers who were the first ones into the concentration camps at the end of the war and it is inconceivable that anyone could say this never happened. These are firsthand witnesses to the atrocities of the Nazi regime.

Yet even the accounts of firsthand witnesses, the collections of artifacts, the files of Nazi documentation, the public trials of the architects of this horrendous policy seem not to make a dent in the propaganda being spewed by the leader of Iran and the rising power in Egypt.

They are playing to the crowd, trying to undermine the main rationale for the creation of the state of Israel. If there was no Holocaust, then finding a safe haven for the world's Jews was not a humanitarian act but simply a land grab of territory occupied by Palestinians.

There can be reasonable debates over the way Israel came into existence and over its current policies. But to dismiss a people's suffering as fiction, to pretend a piece of history does not exist is a recipe for disaster. It means official policies and public perceptions are based on a false view of the world.

Strong rebuttals are needed, but so are ongoing efforts to help people in Arab nations indeed, in all nations understand the reality of what European Jews experienced under Hitler. It is not fiction. It is part of what shapes the world even to this day.

Discuss this topic in the forums =


Top | Home

©-free 2006 Adelaide Institute