In the
shadow of 9/11
It
sounded so good when almost immediately after the 9/11 tragedy US President
George W Bush announced to the world that he would be fighting a war for
freedom and democracy and against terrorism. Who could disagree with such a
noble sentiment? After all, one of the pillars upon which any civilization
rests is the concept of ‘freedom’.
The
problem with the
US
president’s
announcement is how he arrived at it, and the timing for making it.
Western
democracies tend to be living in a delusional state where ideologically there
is the claim that there is a separation of powers of government. The belief is
that the legislative, executive and judiciary powers are indeed quite separate
and independent bodies united by the mindset of governing a society on
democratic principles.
What
happens when the processes of this triadic form of government is hijacked by a
unified mindset that continues to create the illusion of an existing
separation of powers, but in fact is acting unilaterally with a single purpose
other than fulfilling the ideals of a democratic form of government, so to
speak?
What
happens is that ordinary people know they are being deceived by their legally
elected representatives who have failed to protect them from their own
out-of-control government that deflects from any scrutiny of its doings by
looking for and hunting down suitable but quite defenceless scapegoats.
The
war on terrorism fulfils
Huntington
’s inadequate
and deceptive ‘clash of civilizations’. Like any bully-boy, though, the
US
is now
imploding under the weight of its own hypocrisy. All this is made possible
because the Internet has become a weapon of mass instruction that cannot be
controlled, though attempts are there to do just that through the US
Patriots’ Act, and enacting terrorism laws in various ‘democratic’
countries.
In
the
US
the Jewish
cabal consisting of Eastern European immigrant is the driving force behind the
war on terrorism. The Jewish perspective is a long-term one, often a decade or
two ahead of mainstream society wherein they reside. I think Professor Kevin
McDonald would call this an example of a group strategy for survival in a
hostile environment.
I
think it is also important to recall that four days before 9/11 there was an
extraordinary event which shook the complacent western democracies that until
then had had a dream-run at the United Nations. The
Durban
UN-sponsored
conference on ‘Racism, Xenophobia and related matters’ had just ended on
7 September 2001
. Australia’s
own paranoid Jew, Jeremy Jones, was to have presented a paper on ‘Hate on
the Internet’ wherein he
intended to crow about the great success he had had with shutting me up by
legally obtaining a court order that restrains me from discussing historical
matters. He was also celebrating the fact that I had been worked over by the
German judicial system at
Mannheim
where I was
sentenced to 10 months prison for daring to discuss and dispute matters
concerning the ‘Holocaust’.
But
things don’t always turn out the way smug individuals wish, and the
Durban
conference had
latched on to the taboo topic of Jewish supremacism at work in western
democracies. Naturally those that felt threatened cried foul and used the
usual five words to stifle any debate on the topic: ‘hater’, ‘holocaust
denier’, ‘antisemite’, ‘racist’, ‘neo-Nazi’. That most critics
of Jewish behaviour were Semites and thus could not be called racists either
frustrated Jeremy Jones and his usual group of apologists.
The
state of
Israel
stood
condemned as a European colonial entity, apartheid, Zionist and racist state,
to which was added the latest concept: terrorist. At the end of the
Durban
conference,
the Palestinians breathed easy because
Israel
stood
condemned to the world as a terrorist state. Four days later,
Israel
was again part
of the western democratic world, and the Muslim world stood condemned as
having perpetrated 9/11.
That’s
how close it came to
Palestine
emerging as a
legitimate state with
Israel
withering away
into it. It was not to be because the final onslaught in defence of this
anomaly in the
Middle East
had just
begun, and the
US
had begun
blatantly turning upon its own citizens so as to justify its own acts of
overseas aggression.
The
current construction of the wall in
Israel
is a mere
overt expression of the Jewish mindset – the ghetto mentality writ large –
and it will serve to delineate a Jewish homeland within the Arabic-speaking
and Muslim world for a while yet.
After
the 9/11 turmoil had produced conflicting theoretical explanations as to what
happened, things began to settle down again, as is the want of life where
habit still is the flywheel that motivates most of us.
Enter
the overt campaign directors against the world of Islam who need to keep the
pressure up so that the Anglo-American-Zionist attack on
Iraq
may continue
to demolish any trace of a previous civilization that would shame current
Israel
’s existence.
A new
campaign against Islam
In
September 2005 Jew Flemming Rose, a friend of ideologue-neocon Daniel Pipes,
ran a cartoon series in his Danish paper that deliberately blasphemed
Islam’s prophet. The predicted result did not eventuate, but Iran’s
president, Dr Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, had in December
2005 taken up the challenge and announced Iran would be holding a
‘Holocaust’ conference with
the aim of ascertaining the facts of this ’myth’.
After
much hand-wringing and teeth-gnashing and in unison as though they were
singing from the same song-sheet written by the same librettists, western
democratic leaders expressed their ‘abhorrence’ at the Iranian president
daring to even question any aspect of the ‘Holocaust’. In January 2006
other European newspapers began to run the blasphemous cartoons again – and
this time it did ignite expected, and desired, violent protests within Muslim
countries, from
Morocco
to
Iran
.
All
this western frenzy about matters ‘Holocaust’ is now also suspect for
those who have had no definitive views on the matter. What most concerned
individuals have, though, is a worry how Palestinians will survive in their
totally fractured country.
Running
parallel with this developmental outgrowth of 9/11 is, of course, the vicious
imprisonment of a number of Revisionists, namely Germar Rudolf, Wolfgang Fröhlich,
Günter Kögel, Siegfried Verbeke, Ernst Zündel, David Irving, and those in
exile such as Swiss Jürgen Graf.
The
Iranian president explicitly aimed to test the limits of free expression in
western democracies by having Iranian newspapers engage in a cartoon
competition featuring the ‘Holocaust’ as a subject matter. That’s where
things stood as Richard Krege and I visited
Iran
for a couple
of weeks in March 2006 to talk about the ‘Holocaust’ to students at
various universities in
Mashhad
.
Although
I operated under the Federal Court of Australia gag order, I set about
reporting on the raging debate between ‘Holocaust’ believers and
‘Holocaust’ Revisionists. It was relatively straightforward to link the
‘Holocaust’ with
Israel
’s continued
existence, the ‘Holocaust’ serving as its prime propaganda weapon to
create world sympathy for
Israel
.
Propaganda
Put
aside all that propaganda you have heard from the western media about
Iran
and prepare
yourself for an experience. See how a mono-cultural democratic theocracy –
that is still in charge of its own money supply – is thriving in a sea of
hostility generated by the international multi-cultural predatory capitalist
cabal.
Iran
is a tourist
paradise still uncontaminated by the multinational fast-food disease. Although
some exceptions still influence the granting of visitors’ visas, anyone may
arrive at an Iranian airport and obtain a seven-day visa at US$50. Most
visitors will have made prior arrangements for a visit, and so arrival in
Iran
is smoothened
by the presence of a local who knows the scene. After all, for a westerner the
customary warm greeting embrace – cheek-to-cheek for men and no handshake
for the opposite – may upset those who are emotionally mutated by western
materialism.
It
is at this point that what for the economic rationalist is a glaring
inefficiency of getting through immigration and customs, is in fact a subtle
screening process and assessment of the visitor’s character.
Democracy
in
Iran
Iranian
democracy is like living in a large extended family where dozens of
individuals relate to one another at all levels of human interests – always
accompanied by open emotional contact. Hand and body touching, hugs and kisses
is the norm whenever individuals meet. Naturally this happens in total
segregation of males and females. The somewhat ‘impertinent familiarity that
westerners have towards the opposite sex does not exist – at least not
publicly. There is no slobbering
old fool making his way to an innocent babe in the woods!
The
contact between men and women is made through subtle but penetrating eye
contact, and not as is common in western democracies where a woman merely has
to open a couple of buttons on her blouse to gain attention! The less crude
and more subtle and intense way is through eye contact. Eye penetration
reveals the workings of the brain and through it the beauty of the soul. After
all, as one Iranian said to me, has a woman not also a brain?
This
civilized method of communicating has somewhat fatal consequences in our
western materialistic consumer world. Iranian men who venture into western
society are amazed at the uncivilized forms of behaviour that are found even
at university level. Primitive western man responds by noting that Iranian men
appear to be all ‘gay’. Not so! The fact that the ideal of love, marriage
and family still firmly control Iranian behaviour means that men need to
attune to women’s psyche, and that means developing a sensitivity which to a
western woman may not be appealing because it lacks the ‘macho’ factor.
Primitive
western woman has also been subverted by the Marxist-feminist mindset that
operates on a perverted Hegelian dialectic where women pretend to be men, and
men pretend to be women. That such a life-style ‘choice’ will bring actual
physiological changes is a fact. And so the physical-mental divide widens and
a world of tragedy arises where medical help is sought in the hope of
achieving gender re-alignment, etc.
Unlike
in the west, in
Iran
such matters
are still locked in that proverbial cupboard where it will not offend the
normal healthy Socontinuity of the body politics.
That
the current younger generation of Iranians of the post 1979 Revolution era are
like anywhere else in the world experiencing their period of Sturm and Drang
– storm and stress - is a given
and need not be elaborated upon. However, instead of visiting a psychiatrist
and thus paying him money for listening to their personal problems, the
Iranians teenager seeks out for counsel their uncles, aunts, cousins,
grandparents, and anyone else within their extended family. Inevitably there
will be someone who can offer valuable life-experience advice to a developing
mind that has to learn to cope with the increases of yearnings and desire.
The
traditional Iranian family still imbues its young with basic values as
embodied in such concepts as TRUTH, HONOUR, JUSTICE, DUTY, etc.
Such
a moral value system does not encourage an excessive development of the victim
mentality, nor does it open the flood gate to hedonism where individuals are
encouraged to ‘experience everything’ in life. On the contrary, one is
encouraged to know about everything in life but one need not have
done/experienced everything in life. Restraint is thus the guiding moral
principle that is so evident in
Iran
. Add this to
the absolute quest to serve God and the Prophets, then we see this physically
manifest itself where material concerns are not over-rated. With the exception
of the various shrines and mosques, functionality rather than ornate
expressions seems to be the guiding principle controlling human endeavour.
Dr
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
This
moral principle is embodied within the popular Iranian president, Dr Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, the engineer and soldier who before becoming the president was
mayor of the 12+million inhabitants of
Iran
’s capital
city,
Tehran
. His plain
dress-sense indicates he is one of the people and shuns material enrichment,
nor does he dress in traditional clothes.
In
western democracies the driving force is overt
consumerism-materialism-hedonism-nihilism. Anything goes for the sake of
having fun – enjoy yourself, have fun and self-destruct, but don’t
criticise the various political institutions that deliver us that much-praised
western form of ‘freedom and democracy’, with which we can fight the war
on global terrorism. That the 9/11 form of terrorism is made in the USA, that
the White House possessed the receipts that purportedly enabled Ira to acquire
its alleged WMDs was a given, something Iranians are well aware of.
The
large family analogy and the scapegoat concept is useful in explaining how a
family needs a clear enemy picture in order to stay together. For the
USA
and its
willing helpers it is the Muslim world. For the Muslims it is
US
imperialism
and its rather ugly stunted outgrowth – Zionist Israel.
I
noticed the absence of dogs and cats in
Mashhad
, and unlike
London
and
Paris
, for example,
where litter abounds,
Mashhad
is a clean city. In western democracies dogs and cats have
become a substitute companion for many elderly whose extended family has
succumbed to individuality’s quest. In
Iran
the usual
three-generations still exist. To my pointing out that a while ago in
Australia
an elderly
couple was found dead four months after the event, and an elderly man was
found a year or two after he had died. In unison students responded that this
would never happen in Iranian society – not yet, anyway. So, in
Iran
you have
trouble finding a pet but you have no trouble finding an extended family
member. That this can also bring with it some oppressive features is, of
course, a given.
Muslim
women are still fertile while women in the western democracies find it an
imposition to have children and thus have become addicted to abortions, if not
to outright
sterility-barrenness through an act of ‘choice’. Such life-denying
value-system does not deserve to be supported by an elaborate government
program, as is now the case in most western European democracies. I wonder if
this is by design or not, but within such a world view there is no room for
ideals such a TRUTH, HONOUR, JUSTICE, PATRIOTISM, SACRIFICE.
Religious
sincerity
The
subtle and muted expression of religious sentiment in
Iran
indicates a
sincerity that the western high-powered and driven ‘event-Christians’ fail
to develop. Hence there is in Iranians a sense of balance between the physical
and mental worlds. The balance between the physical and the mental world is a
world of constant tensions that most individuals resolve by either opting for
the physical-sensual of for the mental-cerebral. This maturation process is
thus shunned by many who find it too much effort, and so they opt for either
the physical or for the mental world, thereby failing to grasp the
significance of what true freedom is all about – the partaking of the self-actualisation
process.
Iranians
are functioning at this level of development and thus their endeavours to
bring about justice, for example, to the oppressed Palestinians. Iranians do
not flee into an excessive form of consumerism-materialism. Walk along any
street of any city and you will notice that basic infrastructure – such as
roads, water, electricity, rubbish collection – functions well.
For
example, from Australia Iran has bought a system that controls its traffic
lights. At
Mashhad
I saw a number
of intersections that in the centre had mounted distinct numbers, either in
red or green digits, which indicated to a driver how much longer the lights
would remain green or red. Such common sense information delivery eliminates
impatience at the wheel, a no-no in any Iranian traffic situation. While
approaching an intersection a driver can judge if he can make it across or
not, or while sitting there
tapping his fingers on the wheel or shouting at the passengers in frustration
or blasting all with the latest fashionable sound decibels, all are informed
of the progress of time…
Everything,
however, is still not quite completed but forever developing. Cleanliness is
high on the agenda of virtues and the custom of taking off one’s shoes when
entering a home or work is usual. Veneration of the elderly is still practised,
and that is good because it is not possible for an older person to play stupid
or become too excentric in order to opt out of society’s rat-race!
The
separation of the sexes leads to a duplication of services, something that may
be considered to be inefficient by western economic rationalists and
‘equalitists’ who, for example, were jubilant when the first unisex toilet
was installed in public. Apparently it helped those with gender-aligned
problems cope better while using public toilets.
Western
freedoms appear hollow
The
concepts of ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy’ ring hollow and we had a few
laughs when I discussed them during lectures in various classes where law
students sniggered at such concepts used so hypocritically, for example when
Hamas won the election in
Palestine
, which
Israel
and the
US
rejected.
Iranians enjoy more personal freedom than their counterparts in the western
world whose only freedom consists of the freedom to go shopping.
Admittedly,
there are professional limitations imposed on individuals who refuse to comply
with the strict dress code that flow from the theocratic state, and public
office will not be available to anyone who refuses to submit to such. I
wondered then how just and democratic it is to have affirmative action in
western democracies! At least in
Iran
such
affirmative action serves to consolidate the ideal rather than to
fracture-divide society as it does in western democracies where the outcome is
a messy non-cultural multicultural hotch-potch, and where unity of purpose is
deliberately sabotaged for the sake of external interests. As stated before,
Iran
still controls
its own money supply, something that is a red rag to the international
financial cabal. Just as this money matter was the basic issue between Adolf
Hitler and his National Socialists in
Germany
, so too is
Iran
now clearly
swimming against the stream. It is resisting the US-imposed unifying principle
of financial control, that economic straight jacket which so effectively kills
off national interests. Ian still
produces many of its own goods, such as cars and buses, and its quest for
nuclear power is essential for its future development.
New
attack on
Iran
Recently
President Bush announced he would be funding opposition groups in
Iran
. That is an
outright declaration of war against Iran – much like that George Soros
funded orange revolution in Ukraine - because like any mature society, there
will always be disgruntled individuals who find their own society wanting.
Look at me and my criticism of western democracies! But I do this from the
foreign element perspective – I oppose a nation not being able to express
itself from within itself. For example, Germans cannot express themselves as
Germans without somewhere, and immediately, someone coming along to impose a
Jewish-spin to anything German. The latest is a resurgence of digging up the
Hitler controversy about his so-called homosexual-Jewish background. Amazing
how we have individuals who will forever do anything to put a Jewish spin on
things. Iranians, being good Muslims, know all there is about the Jewish
mindset, and are thus not fearful of things Jewish. Jews in
Iran
fare well, but
they cannot dominate Iranian politics because that is the preserve of Islam.
In the USA Jews have captured the nation, as Michael Collins Piper put it so
succinctly,
Washington
/
New York
is the New
Jerusalem!
The
only hope there is for the
Middle East
to come to
rest is that the proxy-US war machine begins to correct itself from within the
USA
. This would
benefit the Palestinians and begin to normalise their tragic existence. But
for the immediate future we can expect the
US
onslaught on
Iran
to be in the
form of enticing the younger generation into outright consumer-hedonism, which
so effectively defeated the former
Soviet Union
countries.
However, Islam is the provider of a strong moral guide for living within a
civil society, something we in the west have lost. The western moral
re-armament movement of the late 50s and early 60s did not withstand the 69s
drug culture of excessive individuality. Its substitute, the ‘Holocaust’
religion cannot sustain the onslaught of truth, and I venture to say that it
is only a matter of time when this propaganda weapon, this myth, this lie will
be abandoned – as soon as
Israel
’s ghetto
existence is secured in a
sea
of
Islam
.
_______________
I began my talks always prefacing it with the following disclaimer that
is also on our website:
"I am operating under a
Federal Court of Australia Gag Order that prohibits me from
questioning/denying the three pillars on which the 'Holocaust'
story/legend/myth rests:
1. During
World War II
,
Germany
had an extermination policy
against European Jewry, 2. of which they killed six million, 3. using as a
murder weapon homicidal gas chambers. It is almost impossible to discuss the
'Holocaust' with such an imposed constraint. I therefore am merely reporting
on matters that I am not permitted to state. For example, if I state the
'Holocaust' is a lie, the gas chambers did not exist, or six million Jews
never died, then I claim that I am merely reporting what Professors
Butz/Faurisson, and others, are stating in public.”
Definition of ‘Holocaust’
During World War Two, 1939-45,
Germany
1. had an
extermination policy against Jews.
2.
murdered six million Jews.
3. the
main murder weapon was a homicidal gas chamber, in particular at Auschwitz-Birkenau.
I then
played the video clip from ABC TV Lateline,
21
February 2006
, noting the following
quotations:
Fredrick Töben: “It’s not a novel notion that the Iranian President expressed in
asking for the dismemberment of the racist, Zionist, apartheid state of
Israel
. It’s a notion that needs to be discussed.”
Jewish Community – “does not enter into a debate with Dr Töben or anyone whether the
‘Holocaust’ happened or not.”
Words used to stop any discussion involving Jewish interests:
•
HATER
•
HOLOCAUST DENIER
•
ANTISEMITE
•
RACIST
•
NAZI
•
Why do Zionists push the ‘Holocaust’? – to
justify the existence of
Israel
and
distract from ethnic cleansing of
Palestine
. It
is
Israel
’s
number one propaganda weapon that deflects from any criticism of Jewish
behaviour.
The Mufti of
Jerusalem
- Haj Amin al Husseini
•
National Socialists had in their SS elite fighting
forces Muslim troops
•
Muslims would never have joined had the National
Socialists been racists.
•
The term NAZI is a twisted term used by Jews for
war-time propaganda against any PATRIOT/NATIONALIST
•
The war on terrorism is a war on Islam.
•
Jews use the term RACISM against anyone who expresses
patriotic/nationalist ideas.
•
This is in stark contrast to what Jews learn from their
BABYLONIAN TALMUD–MISHNA the source of their religious/moral/ethical
framework. It is immoral, unethical towards non-Jews who are called
‘cattle’. Biblical enemy is called ‘Amalek’ whom they are REQUIRED to
kill – today they consider the Palestinians to be ‘Ámalek’;
REVISIONISTS are called ‘Amalek’.
•
Australian Politicians forced to clarify values –
freedom and democracy threatened by Muslim life-style.
Three important statements that contextualize the ‘Holocaust’ debate:
1. A HOLOCAUST BELIEVER IS EITHER
IGNORANT OF THE FACTS OR A LIAR.
2. DON’T BLAME ONLY THE JEWS,
BLAME THE COWARDS THAT BEND TO THEIR PRESSURE.
3. IN
IRAN
EVERYTHING IS POLITICS & EVERYTHING IS RELIGION.
Add to that - EVERYTHING IS
SCIENCE. A good society balances Religion-Politics-Science.
Brief overview of legal status of ‘Holocaust’ discussion in world
•
Australia
–
racial hatred – gag order – education: Mrs Olga Scully, Dr Fredrick Töben
•
USA
–
no limitations but social/financial pressure: Prof Arthur Butz, Willis Carto
•
Canada
–
criminal -racial hatred: Ernst Zündel, Marc Lemire
•
New
Zealand
– social/financial pressure: Dr
Joel Hayward
•
South
Africa
– still free: Muslim Radio 768
•
Britain
–
criminal - racial hatred
•
Germany
–
criminal - defaming memory of dead- prison, fines: Dr Wilhelm Stäglich, Udo
Walendy, Günter Deckert, Günter Kögel, Ingrid Weckert
•
Austria
–
re-activating National Socialism: Wolfgang Fröhlich, Frank Swoboda, David
Irving
•
France
–
disputing
Nuremberg
judgments: Prof Robert Faurisson, Vincent Reynouard,
•
Switzerland
–
racial hatred: Jürgen Graf, Rene Berclaz
•
Belgium
–
racial hatred: Siegfried Verbeke, (Carlos Porter)
•
Netherlands
-
racial hatred – no Revisionists
•
Sweden
–
free since end 2005: Ahmed Rami – Radio Islam
•
Poland
–
racial hatred, since 1999 – NATO entry: Dr Dariusz Ratajczak
•
Russia
–
free: Jürgen Graf
•
Ukraine
–
free – university studies, Dr David Duke
•
Israel
–
criminal
•
Japan
–
financial pressure
•
Lebanon
–
2001 Revisionist Conference banned.
