ISSN 1440-9828
                                                                                  No 329



Richard Toye, Sir Winston Churchill, Sir Martin Gilbert and the end of lies

David Brockschmidt

David Brockschmidt, Adelaide, 19 April 2007

The Spectator’s review, 17 March 2007, of Gilbert’s book: Churchill and the Jews, to be published by Simon & Schuster, Great Britain, in June 2007, and in the USA by Holt in October 2007, starts with a whitewash of Churchill in 1937.

Gilbert is trying to tell his readers that Churchill’s thoughts written down by the British Labour Party’s candidate of 1937, Adam Marshall Diston, had absolutely nothing to do with Churchill. According to Gilbert not one word of this essay, which was only recently published in Richard Toye’s Churchill and Lloyd George, Cambridge University Press, 2007, has absolutely nothing to do with Churchill. In Gilbert’s words >>Churchill has not written one word himself<<.

Gilbert informs that Churchill paid Diston to draft his story, and Churchill merely amended parts of it. Gilbert then states that this Diston-Churchill story never appeared in print but was published.

This statement does not make sense. If it was never published in print, in which form was it then published? Was it made public only by word of mouth? Did the BBC broadcast it? Or how were Churchill’s thoughts written down by Diston made known to the public?

I think Gilbert owes us an explanation here.

According to Gilbert the Churchill-Diston story failed to be published three times. The last attempt to publish this story failed in 1940 when Churchill’s response to publishing this story was >>I have forgotten all about it, and I will not permit anybody to publish it<<.

In response to the Spectator’s story of 17 March 2007, >Churchill is too fond of the Jews<, Richard Toye writes this letter, dated 24 March 2007:


In his piece ‘Churchill was too fond of the Jews, Sir Martin Gilbert suggests that Winston Churchill should not be held responsible for the article ‘How the Jews can combat persecution?’, which was commissioned from him in 1937 by the US magazine Liberty to which I draw attention in my book Lloyd George and Churchill: Rival for Greatness. Sir Martin and I both agree that the article was drafted by ghostwriter Adam Marshall Diston.

It has been reported in some parts of the media that Churchill rejected Diston’s draft because he did not agree with it. I note that Sir Martin does not make that claim in his article, but rather observes that Churchill’s piece was twice offered for publication. It would seem that he grounds of debate have narrowed considerably. On the one hand, there is the contention that although Churchill tried to get the article published, he was not answerable for its contents because his efforts to do so were unsuccessful. On the other is my argument that Churchill’s attempt to get it into print under his own name demonstrate that in 1937 (though not in 1940, when the question arose again) he was happy to endorse the sentiments it contained.

Richard Toye, Homerton College, Cambridge, UK.


This makes it quite clear to me that Churchill was the author of this essay and Diston was the ghost-writer, and Sir Martin’s attempt to whitewash Churchill fails miserably. But, of course, Gilbert’s story does not end here. He keeps on quoting Churchill’s philo-semitism as expressed in Churchill’s address to the Manchester Jewish Constituents in 1907 saying: >>Be good Jews. You can only be a good Englishman if you are a good Jew<<.

Well, if Churchill really said that, then he was either trying to pull the wool over the non-Jewish eyes, or he didn’t know what he was talking about and appears to know nothing about Judaism.

The first loyalty of any Jew at that time, and for the vast majority of Jews today, is not the constitution and the laws of the countries wherein they live, but the Torah, Talmud and Erez Israel.

The founder of the Frankfurt House of Rothschild, Meyer Amschel Rothschild, said: >>Give me the money of a country and I don’t care about their laws<<.

Torah, Talmud and Erez Israel beat the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights, and Great Britain any time, and Gilbert knows that. Please, Sir Martin, don’t try to tell us otherwise.

Let me make this double-loyalty of Judaism crystal clear here with a quote from the great American Rabbi, Stephen S Wise: >>I am not an American citizen of Jewish faith. I am a Jew. I have been an American citizen for 63 years, but I have been a Jew for 4000 years<<.

Let’s continue with Sir Martin’s new book here. He quotes Churchill saying >>Keep the Jewish movement free from Communism<<.

By Allah, Jesus and Elohim, if communism is not a miscarriage of Judaism, then what is it, and where is it coming from? Gilbert makes it clear in his book that Churchill was alarmed >>By the prominence of individual Jews in senior positions in the communist revolutions in Russia, Hungary, Bavaria-Germany, since the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. What Gilbert fails to tell his readers here is the fact that Communism-Bolshevism is one of the brainchilds of Judaism, from Karl Marx to Leon Trotzki to Lazar Kaganovich, to David Ben Gurion. Of course not all Jews were communists, communist Jews killed in Soviet Russia hundreds of thousands of non-communist Jews and millions of Gentiles in co-operation with their non-Jewish Bolshevik brothers and sisters. Approximately 65 million in Soviet Russia and Eastern Europe between 1917 until Stalin’s death in 1953, according to Solshenitzin, Bukowski, Nekrassow, and other Russian and non-Russian historians.

We are not dealing here with a few prominent Jews as Churchill said within the Bolshevik revolution but the vast majority of leaders in the Bolshevik government and administrations were Jewish. Remember that out of Lenin’s first Petrograd Bolshevik government, nearly 90 per cent were Jewish.

In order to confirm what I am saying, here are quotes of famous public Jewish personalities confirming that Bolshevism is another brainchild of Judaism:


>>We the Jews, are a people, one people. When we sink, we become revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of a revolutionary party. When we rise, there arises also the terrible power of our purse<< Theodor Herzl: The Jewish State, 1896.


>>The Jews in Russia, in their total mass were responsible for the revolution.<< Angelo S Rappaport: The Pioneers of the Russian Revolution, Stanley Paul & C. London, 1918.


>>Bolshevism is a religion and a faith. How could those half-converted believers dream to vanquish the truthful and the faithful of their own creed, those holy crusaders, who had gathered around the Red Standard of the prophet Karl Marx, and who fought under the daring guidance of those experienced officers of all latter-day revolutions – the Jews?<< Dr Oscar Levy in his Preface to: The World’s Significance of the Russian Revolution, by George Pitt-Rivers, 1920.


>>The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a new world order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains and because of Jewish dissatisfaction and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the world.<< The American Hebrew, September 10, 1920.


>>There is much in the fact of Bolshevism, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolsheviks. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with many of the highest ideals of Judaism.<<Jewish Chronicle, London April 4, 1919.


>>It is often said that Judaism is the driving force of communism, but this does not prove anything beyond that which is expected and only natural. Is it surprising that Judaism should become the fermenting and destructive elements in countries which have always despised and persecuted it? That particular facility for intrigue, strategim, conspiracies, and that patient, almost uncanny waiting for the hour of never failing revenge, are all characteristics of the Chosen People.<< Professor F A Ossendowski, The Nineteenth Century and After, London, January 1926.


>>We are one people, despite the ostensible rifts, cracks, and differences between the American and Soviet democracies. We are one people and it is not in our interest that the west should liberate the east for in doing this and in liberating the enslaved nations, the west would inevitably deprive Jewry of the eastern half of its world power.<<  Chaim Weizmann, in: World Conquerors, by Louis Marschalko, Joseph Sueli Publishers, London, 1958.


>>We Jews who have posed as saviors of the world, we are today nothing else but the world’s seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners.<< Oscar Levy.


>>The two internationals of finance and revolution work with ardour, they are the two front of the Jewish International. There is a Jewish conspiracy against all nations.<< Rene Gross, Le Nouveau Mercure, Paris, May 1927.


>>It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism. All that is in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews.<< Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to all Antisemites, London, 1939.


>>Let us recognize that we Jews are a distinct nationality of which every Jew, whatsoever his country, his station, or shade of belief, is necessarily a member. Organize, organize, until every Jew must stand up and be counted – counted with us, or prove himself wittingly or unwittingly, of the few who are against their own people.<< Louis Brandeis.


>>Some call it Marxism, I call it Judaism.<< Rabbi Stephen Wise, The American Bulletin, May 15, 1935.


>>Only recently our race has given the world a new prophet, but he has two faces and bears two names. On the one side his name is Rothschild, leader of all capitalists, and on the other, Karl Marx, the apostle of those who want to destroy the other.<< Blumenthal, Judisk Tidskrift, No 57, Sweden, 1929.


>>Marxism is the modern form of Jewish prophecy.<< Reinhold Niebur, Speech before the Jewish Institute of Religion, New York, October 3, 1934.


>>How do you account for the fact that so many young Jews may be found in radical movements all over the lands?<< Michael Gold, New Masses, May 7, 1935.



>>The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attain dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this New World Order the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their own hands.<< Baruch Levy, >Letter to Karl Marx<, in: La Revue De Paris, June1, 1928.


>>Marxism, you say, is the bitterest opponent of capitalism, which is sacred to us. For the simple reasons that they are opposing poles, they deliver over to us the two poles of the earth and permit us to be its axis. These two opposites, Bolshevism and ourselves, find ourselves identified in the Internationale. And these two opposites, the doctrine of the two poles of society, meet in their unity of purpose, the renewal of the world from above by the control of wealth and from below by revolution.<< Quotation from the Jewish banker, Lindeman, by the Comte de Saint-Aulaire in Geneve contre la Paix. Libraire Plan, Paris, 1936.


>>If the tide of history does not turn towards communist internationalism, then the Jewish race is doomed.<< George Marlen, Stalin, Trotzky or Lenin, New York, 1937.


>>You have not begun to appreciate the depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them. We have been at the bottom of not merely the latest Great War, but of every other major revolution of history.  We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it. No-one can tell how long we shall go on doing it. Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone.<< Marcus Eli Ravage, Century Magazine, February 1928.


Let’s continue with Sir Martin’s whitewash of Churchill.

Sir Winston was such a philo-Semite that when Lloyd George wanted to include three Jewish cabinet ministers among his seven Liberals in his 1918 administration, Churchill said: >>There is a point about Jews which occurs to me – you must not have too many of them.<<

Dear reader, if this is not a true and honest statement of Sir Winston’s philo-semitism, then what else could it be? Antisemitism?

Gilbert here quotes Churchill’s >>Zionism is a very great ideal<< and continues with Churchill’s statement about promoting a Jewish state as early as 1920, wherein he suggests that four million Jews should be settled on the banks of the Jordan River under the protection of the British Crown.

In Churchill’s 1922 White Paper it states: <<The Jews are in Palestine of right and not of sufferance.<<

Gilbert does not tell us here what these rights for European Jewish settlement, meaning land confiscation in Palestine from the Palestinians, are based on. Is it Torah, Talmud, the terrible power of the Jewish purse, as Herzl said? Or, is it just the fact that Sir Churchill and the whole Churchill clan was nearly bankrupt and had to be bailed out by Jewish bankers, as did Bernard Baruch in New York, USA, Lindeman in Baden-Baden, Germany, and/or the world-wide banking house of Rothschild.

May I also remind the reader and Sir Martin, that Sir Winston Churchill traveled by train from Cairo to Gaza, then on to Jerusalem where Churchill met Rothschild.

In Jerusalem Baron Rothschild informed Churchill that his bank will finance the new to-be-established Jewish state in Palestine, but that the Palestinians have to be ethnically cleansed before the Jewish state can be established.

Of course Rothschild’s demands to ethnically cleanse the proposed homeland for the Jews made sense because where else would you settle four million Jews in Palestine, if not on land that belonged to Palestinians for over three thousand years.

Lawrence of Arabia protected Churchill from being killed by the Arab masses who hated Churchill and the British even more than the Ottoman Turks.

The Balfour Declaration, which was not written by Lord Balfour but by the closet-Jew Ameri who only disclosed being Jewish on his deathbed, did not protect the rights of the Palestinians as we can see today. Less that 20 per cent of the ex-British mandate of Palestine is left for the Palestinians.

There is a famous photograph from the beginning at the 19th century, which shows the German Kaiser Wilhelm II sitting on his horse and overlooking the hills of Jerusalem. In front of the horse you have the founder of Zionism and modern Israel, Theodor Herzl, and surprise, surprise, the young Winston Churchill looking up to the god-like Kaiser in all his glory and shining uniform.

This was the symbolic moment when the final solution for the Palestinian people and the Arab world was worked out – between imperial Britain and imperial Germany!

By promising Herzl his Jewish state in Palestine, financed by the Rothschilds, and using the Zionists with which to safeguard the British and German interests in the Middle East the result was the plunder of the resources belonging to the Palestinians and the Arab world. No wonder they hate us today.

The Unsolved Problem remains to this day

Here are two relevant letters from the local Adelaide Advertiser:


Look at the UN facts

Margaret Cassar, Westbourne Park

The Advertiser, 9 April 2007

The debate on Israel-Palestine must move away from uninformed opinions and look at the facts.

The latest UN report into conditions in Gaza states that 1.1 million of the 1.4 million Palestinians who live there are dependent on food aid. One result of this is that 25 per cent of children are anaemic because of malnutrition. In the four years from 2000 to 2004 half of Gaza’s usable land, including farms and infrastructure had been bulldozed by Israeli forces.

About 500 Israeli Jews go to jail each year rather than serve in the occupied territories and add to the suffering of the Palestinians.


Palestine water annexed

Joyce Scott, Urrbrae

The Advertiser, 12 April 2007

Palestinians are being driven off their land in all manner of ways. Annexing their main water supply is one method. The mountain ground water basin, the Palestinian’s largest reservoir has, with other aquifers, been consolidated behind Israel’s apartheid wall, a massive and divisive structure being built in contravention of international opinion.

The UN general assembly, on October 21, 2003, passed a resolution condemning the wall on Palestinian land. On July 9, 2004, the Hague International Court of Justice found the route of the wall to be a serious and egregious violation of international law. The Israeli government’s response was to continue the wall, seize the land, demolish homes and destroy livelihoods. This was despite the opinion of a growing number of Israeli people who are against this injustice and oppression. Eminent Jewish write Tanya Reinhart sums up the dire situation in her book The Roadmap to Nowhere.

We need to see beyond the fraudulent propaganda of consecutive Israeli governments.


Of course in Sir Gilbert’s book there is no word in regard to Palestinian misery. Quite the opposite. In Gilbert’s book Churchill continues to say: >>The Jews have any right in the world to bring economical, political and financial pressure on any government which persecutes them.<< From this it is clear that Sir Winston with the Rothschild money is in fact promoting ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians.

Gilbert makes a lot of how the press in Hitler’s Germany abused Churchill because he, Churchill, stood up for the Jewish rights in Germany and against the German antisemtic policies. Gilbert does not tell his readers that world Jewry declared war on Germany as early as 1933, only two months after Hitler came to power.

In 1910 Churchill suggested that the Zionist leader, Chaim Weizmann, become British High Commissioner to Palestine. As Home Secretary, Sir Winston signed Weizmann’s naturalization papers, making him a British citizen. The same Weizmann, who later became the first president of Israel, and who in 1939 said >>World War Two is our war, a Jewish war against Germany and the Axis powers.<<

Let’s also not forget here what the great fighter against Nazism, Fascism and antisemitism, Winston Churchill, said in 1935: >Germany will be destroyed<<.

This did not stop him having diplomatic relations with Germany, signing all kinds of agreements with Germany, including military ones, and then in 1938 admiring Hitler and praising him for re-building Germany saying: >Whenever Britain should come in such a desperate situation like Germany did before Hitler, I pray that god will send us a man like Adolf Hitler to save our country.<<

Sir Winston’s blood, sweat and tears, not his own, of course, but the blood, sweat and tears of the British people, were a very high price to pay for winning World War Two. He won the war, lost the peace and the British Empire to the Americans who also win wars but continuously lose the peace, again and again, which means they have learned nothing out of history.

Let’s make another point about Churchill’s link to fascism, Sir Winston’s personal friendship with Benito Mussolini.

Mussolini’s letter to Churchill show quite clearly how fond they were of each other. Unfortunately for history but fortunately for Churchill and the legend spun around him by the court historians, Churchill’s answers to Mussolini’s letters were conveniently lost.

Nevertheless, Mussolini’s responses in his letters to Churchill make it quite clear how fond they were of each other. After all, it was not only the British imperial forces in Palestine who trained the Zionists how to kill unarmed Palestinian civilians, men women, and children, the Italian fascists financed the Zionists’ military training.

Ben Gurion said in his diary in regard to Palestinians: >>We must show no mercy on the Palestinians, men women and children. We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population. Let us not ignore the truth among ourselves. Politically we are the aggressors and they, the Palestinians defend themselves. The country is theirs because they inhabit it, whereas we want to come here and settle down, and in their view we want to take away from them their country.<<

This is what Ariel Sharon said: >>Even if it means blowing up one or two synagogues here and there, I don’t care. What you don’t seem to understand is that the dirty work of Zionism is not finished yet, far from it.<<

If I would be a cynic, I would call that the pain of nation building.

Let me attempt to round up the issues of my considerations

After the Potsdam Agreement of 1945 between the Allies over defeated Germany, Churchill said >>We slaughtered the wrong pig<< because he realized what the Soviets were up to – but it was all too late. The British Empire was lost to the US Americans who can win wars but cannot build, keep and administer an empire.

Hitler was desperate to make peace with Churchill and Roosevelt because already in the 1930s he could foresee what the Soviets were up to >World Revolution<!

Hitler made over 40 peace offers to the British, French and later to the US Americans, but they were all rejected. World War Two was a totally unnecessary war. It did not even have to start, and after it began Churchill could have ended the war in 1940 without Britain being attacked. Remember here, please, that Britain and France declared war on Germany, before that giving the Poles carte blanche to deal with Germany in regard to Danzig and the corridor.

Sir Hartle Shawcross, who was the British chief prosecutor at the 1945 International Military Tribunal Nürnberg, gave a speech on 12 March 1948 entitled: >>Ashamed and Humiliated<<, which was reported in the Times of London:

>>Step by step I have arrived at the conviction that the aims of communism in Europe are sinister and fatal. At the Nürnberg trials I, together with my Russian colleagues, condemned Nazi aggression and terror. I believe now that Hitler and the German people did not want war. But we – Britain – declared war on Germany intent to destroy it in accordance with our principle of the balance of power, and we were encouraged by the Americans around Roosevelt.<<

Churchill’s greatest mistake was to ally himself with Stalin who wanted to steamroll the whole of Europe, starting on 6 July 1941, only three weeks after Hitler landed a pre-emptive strike against Soviet Russia. Had he done otherwise, then 55 million people would not have died in this inferno called World War Two, Great Britain would never have been attacked by Germany, Soviet Russia would never have been able to occupy eastern Europe for 50 years, killing millions of its own people and others, Mao Zedong would never have come to power in China where he killed up to 80 million of his own people, the Korean and Vietnam wars would never have happened – and have a look at what a mess the world is in today.

Let’s end this painful chapter of history with three more Churchill quotations:


>>We make a living by what we get, but we make a life by what we give.<<


>>History will be kind to me because I intend to write it.<<


>>Historical truth is so important that it has to be protected by an army of lies.<<


I rest my case!



 South Korean 'loner' behind Virginia massacre. April 18, 2007

By ninemsn staff and wires

Cho Seung-Hui, 23 (AAP)

Cho Seung-Hui felt he was a victim

[Fredrick Töben asks: Think on these things: Cho Seung-Hui, a >disturbed< young man studying English literature. How much of today’s English literature consist of fictitious Jewish Holocaust-Shoah horror stories?]


Anger and grief gripped the campus of Virginia Tech University on Tuesday as police identified the gunman behind the deadliest school shooting in US history as a South Korean student "loner."


Monday's rampage at the university in southwestern Virginia, which left more than 30 people dead, was carried out by Cho Seung-Hui, 23, an English major at Virginia Tech, police said. The Chicago Tribune newspaper and ABC News reported that Cho had left behind a note in his dormitory in which he railed against "rich kids."  "You caused me to do this," he wrote in the several-page-long note that railed against "debauchery" and "deceitful charlatans."


Lucinda Roy, director of creative writing at Virginia Tech's English department, had Cho in one of her classes and described him as "troubled."


"There was some concern about him," said Professor Carolyn Rude, chairwoman of the department. "Sometimes, in creative writing, people reveal things and you never know if it's creative or if they're describing things, if they're imagining things or just how real it might be. But we're all alert to not ignore things like this."


AP reports that Cho was referred to the university's counselling service, but the outcome of the session is unknown.

Prof Rude refused to release any of his writings or his grades, citing privacy laws.


Harrowing accounts of bravery and survival emerged as thousands of students, many wearing the orange-and-maroon colors of the school, gathered on campus for a memorial service to be attended by President George W. Bush and his wife, Laura.


Distraught family members and friends kept up a vigil for news of loved ones still missing after the massacre. Chief Virginia medical examiner Marcella Fierro said it would take several days to identify the victims.


Two people were shot dead in an initial attack in a campus dormitory on Monday around 7:15 am. Another 30 were killed in Norris Hall, an engineering building, two-and-a-half hours later. Up to 30 others were wounded.


Steve Flaherty, superintendent of state police, told reporters Cho was in his senior year at Virginia Tech, was from Centreville, Virginia, and had been living in a campus dormitory. He was a resident alien in the United States. No motive was given for the rampage.


Larry Hincker, associate vice president for university relations, said officials had difficulty obtaining information about the gunman. "He was a loner," he said.


Cho had shown recent signs of "violent, aberrant behavior," including stalking women and setting a fire in a dorm room, the newspaper reported.


Cho shot himself in the head as police closed in on Norris Hall, where he had methodically gunned down dozens of students and faculty members after chaining the doors of the building from the inside.


Flaherty said a 9mm handgun and a .22 caliber handgun had been recovered from Norris Hall and ballistics tests indicated one of the weapons was used in both shootings. "It certainly is reasonable for us to assume that Cho was the shooter in both places, but we don't have the evidence to take us there at this particular point in time," Flaherty said.


As police pursued their investigation into the rampage, the campus of this university of 26,000 students in southwestern Virginia prepared to welcome President Bush for a memorial ceremony.


Counselling was being offered Tuesday at the university's conference centre, where a crisis unit has been set up. The White House ordered flags on US government buildings to be flown at half-mast.


"Our nation grieves with those who have lost loved ones at Virginia Tech. We hold the victims in our hearts. We lift them up in our prayers, and we ask a loving God to comfort those who are suffering," Bush said in a proclamation.


Amid the shock and horror, some students and families criticized college officials who failed to lock down the campus or alert students when gunfire first broke out.


"If someone has come into a campus and murdered two students in a dorm there should be a mass filing informing students and staff of what is going on immediately," said Lorraine Watkins, who drove to Blacksburg with her husband, Jeff, to see their 19-year-old daughter Lauren.


The head of public safety for Virginia, John Marshall, defended university authorities on Tuesday telling a press conference the right decisions had been made. "(University authorities) made the right decisions based on the best information that they had available at the time," Marshall said.


Police said bodies were found in four classrooms and a stairwell in Norris Hall.


Student Erin Sheehan survived along with a handful of classmates in a 20-plus member German class. Students held the door shut against the gunman after he barged in twice and fired repeatedly, she said. "He seemed very thorough about it, getting almost everyone down. I was trying to act dead," she said.


The shooting immediately renewed concern over school security and access to guns that was rekindled last year by a rash of shootings. The state of Virginia has some of the weakest gun licensing requirements in the country.


The mass shooting came almost eight years to the day after two students ran amok in Columbine High School, killing 13 people and themselves, and six months after a lone gunman shot dead five people at an Amish school in Pennsylvania.


As world leaders offered their condolences, the South Korean government expressed "indescribable surprise and shock" after the gunman was identified as a South Korean.


Savonarola or Cyrus?

Iran:  Will there be the great Arian renewal after the victory over the Holocaust Politics?

Dagmar Brenne


Savonarola oder Kyros?

A commentary on Thomas Kielinger’s article

-  received on 15 April 2007 from

Translated by Dagmar Brenne


The US-Israeli hate-mongering against Iran may have deeper roots than only the concern about Tehran's Atomic program. The pen pushers of the Israel lobby fuel the wishful thinking of the Jewish Centres of power with ever new metaphors.

Lately Thomas Kielinger from the Die WELT newspaper desires that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad may transform himself into an Iranian Savonarola.

>>Teheran, a guardian of peace, of love and of truth, as Ahmadinejad, a Muslim Savonarola, never tires to repeat.<< - Die Welt, 5.4.2007.


Savonarola Ahmadinejad

It may be true, that much of Girolamo Savonarola is embodied in the Iranian president Ahmadinejad, as is shown by his engagement for an unhampered research of the history of the Holocaust history.

>>In his own way, Savonarola did truthfully seek the good for his society, the good of the church, the good for his Christian people. But it is exactly there where the highest Authority of the Church barred his way.  And from this very Authority came the condemnation and lastly the judgment<<. – ZDF- Expedition, 14.01.2007.

The Jewish centres of power are built upon thousands of years of a history of success. Always, it were the good ones who were executed and burnt, while the corrupt helpers, were put in high positions, in order to lead the masses. Girolamo Savonarola turned his back on the corrupt, sinful, Roman Centre of the Christian Church and brought the people of Florence behind him. Up to 16,000 citizens listened to his preaching in the Dome of Florence. For this he became at last yet another victim of the many gruesome crimes of the >Holy See<.

Pope Alexander VI, who, like so many of his predecessors and successors was most probably financed by those, whom Jesus called a brood of vipers and whom he cast out of the temple, needed a spectacular trial. He tortured Savonarola, until the tormented man confessed, what his henchmen wanted to hear: heresy and a pact with the devil.

Afterwards the painstricken man recanted. The pope continued the torture more severely for several more weeks. At the end he received the >confession< which the pope had so eagerly awaited. It was only in this way that he could break the charisma of the prophet with his wonderful gifts before all the world, amidst a bloodthirsty mob.

As Savonarola was being led to the gallows on May 23, 1498 one is without doubt reminded of the crucifixion of Jesus or the Nürnberg >trials< of the victor-criminals.

Just like the victims of Nuremberg and the Persian victims of the feast of >Purim< this fighter for good ended on the gallows tree and his body was burnt afterwards.

Savonarola was not allowed to walk this last walk in the habit of the Dominicans. Pope Alexander wanted to rob him of the last piece of dignity before the hangman placed the noose around his neck. The pope cynically ordered the body of Savonarola and two of his followers to be burnt in the Piazza della Signorina.

>>I honour Savonarola as a Saint<<, were the words of another monk only a few years after the death of the >black Prophet<. The monk was Martin Luther.

The destiny of Savonarola is also the desire for Ahmadinejad by the mighty ones of the Israel lobby, when they order the mercenary penpushers to expostulate about >Iran's Savonarola<.

But it can turn out differently too.

Maybe Ahmadinejad will continue were the famous Persian king Cyrus left off, who was the king who truly founded the first Empire in history.

If you dig here, you invariably encounter the roots of the hatred of the Israel lobby for Ahmadinejad. The influential Jewish publicist, Lord Weidenfeld, maintains that Ahmadinejad, and perhaps he is not wrong in this, has read Adolf Hitler's book:

>>But the Iranian has doubtlessly read the translation of Mein Kampf, which is widely publicised in the Islamic world.<< - Die Welt, 16.7.2006.

For Mr. Weidenfeld it is more >>criminal<< to be an Aryan than to read Mein Kampf.

The announcement by president Ahmadinejad to belong to the Aryan nation and his claim of the Jewish Holocaust -tale as >>pure fiction<<, turns him into the most prominent Amalek since Adolf Hitler. 

 >>An Iranian Academic, who knew the (president of Iran) well, when he was still the Mayor of Tehran said, that Ahmadi-Neschad was proud of his Indogermanic, that is, his >>Aryan<< heritage. In regards to the question of the Holocaust he says in two special breaths: Hitler's Genocide of 6 Million Jews is pure fiction.<< - Die Welt, 16.7.2006.

The Aryans, which means as much as the >Noble ones< are translated in the Jewish Kabala as >Amalek<, that is, an arch enemy who has to be eradicated. The origin of this is Marduk, the adversary of Yahweh.

The Mesopotamian imperial God Marduk, with his seat in the Aryan cultural centre of Babylon was the guardian of all Aryan gods on Earth under the banner of the Swastika. Due to the Babylonian captivity of the Jews, Marduk proved his superiority over Yahweh- in the sign of the Swastika. In a certain University Thesis it is said, >>Was Marduk, the god of Babylon, mightier than Yahweh?<< University Duisburg- Essen, Inst. für Ev. Theologie/Metzger/Babylon.

Cyrus the Great, Aryan Founder of the first Empire of History!

The circle begins to close, for the Iranians are about the oldest Aryan people on Earth. And they are even proud of it.

>>In the Persian language–realm the word Aryan is still in use and becomes ever more popular as self-description<< - wikipedia.

[Dagmar Brenne comments: Could there be an insurmountable, murderous envy on part of the Jews, who have never built an empire, but rather have been instrumental at destroying empires, eg. the Russian? Even their much yearned for ''Israel'' has turned sour for them. Many are leaving, yes - even to go and live in Germany!]

Because the Persian king Cyrus, founded the first true world - empire, took Babylon over and showed Marduk the greatest respect, as well as bringing Israel under Persian control, this has earned the Persians the appellation of >Amalek<.

The mercenary pen pushers of the Israel lobby know of the pride of Aryan Iranians and their knowlegde of history. Kielinger clearly underlines this in his Savonarola comparison:

>>And besides that, his – Ahmadinejad’s – demeanour was calculated to emphasize the role as a leader of a Civilisation dating back some 7,000 years<< Die Welt, 5.4.2007, p.1.

The most holy emblem of the Aryans, the sign of Marduk and Vishnu, the Swastika, signifies for the Israel lobby exactly that, what the Crucifix is for a vampire.

The Jews of the world, declared war on Germany on 24. March 1933, this is without their being a State, simply by leaning on their worldwide influence in the economic area.

This happened one day after Adolf Hitler's empowering in the parlia -

mentarian-democratic Reichstag, intended to banish poverty from the land.

Not only was Hitler legitimised in a most democratic way as Chancellor of the Reich, but there was also no >>persecution of Jews<< at that point, when the Jews issued their declaration of War on Germany.

What was the true reason for the Jewish declaration of war? The symbol of the Aryan world of their Gods, the Swastika, was the reason! Because Hitler used the most holy thing of the Aryan culture and religion, the emblem under which Jesus preached, which is very much feared by Yahweh, and which Hitler resurrected to life, fit was for that reason that  war was declared on him and his people. In the declaration of war it says verbatim:

>> The appearance of the Swastika as a symbol for a new Germany called the lion of Judah, the old fighting symbol of the Jews to alert.<< - Declaration of war JUDEA DECLARES WAR ON GERMANY, Daily Express, London, 24. March 1933, p.1.

The hatred of Yahweh for the Persians is best illustrated in the book of >Esther< from the Old Testament. The feast of >Purim<, which is annually lavishly celebrated and reminds us, how Mordecai with Esther's help achieved to get the enemies of the Jews at the court of Achashwerosh killed.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad knows, that the power of the Israel lobby as adversary of the Aryan Persians is founded in the story of the Jewish Holocaust tale. He knows, that with the help of this story the  most despicable crimes against humanity have found justification. And in this connection, Ahmadinejad is indeed like Savonarola: For the sake of Truth he endeavours to search out the Jewish Holocaust Saga. This renders him the mortal enemy of the Israel lobby, and he knows that for this, they seek to destroy him and his country.

But USrael no longer possesses the old strength, to bring the world under its yoke without effort as it was possible in the past. >>The lost victory in Iraq<< is followed by the defeat in Afghanistan. But the defeat in Afghanistan will lead to the dissolution of the NATO.

>>If the Hindukush is no longer  tenable ... the consequences of  a central Asian displacement of power is not to be estimated. It would be a very narrow situation for the Nato, revealing its lack of leadership- the reputation, which NATO as yet has never lost would be gone<<Die Welt, 13.3.2007, p8.

The Dissolution of NATO tips the Holocaust-World-Order over, even without a financial breakdown of America, which by the way has become totally unavoidable.

Out of this situation could come the hour of an  Ahmadinejad, who, thanks to his intelligence, his decency could destroy the foundation of the present world political system and, in the footsteps of King Cyrus, create a new Iran, from which emanates a new and beaming World Order.

The chances for Ahmadinejad are good, for >>Russia's return to world politics<< - J. Fischer SZ, 1.4.2007, p2 - is only possible with a pact with Iran. Russia and Iran are preparing a cartel for their exports of Gas. The West, which cannot exist without the deliveries of energy from Russia and Iran is standing at the crossroad of choices: to begin a war with Iran or to abandon the old Holocaust world power politics and to leave the future to the powers of a new world order.

To begin a war with Russia is not possible for the West at this point in time, even though NATO has begun to encircle Russia with American rockets in Chechnya and Poland. A war with Iran is possible, but un-winnable. The consequences would be disastrous for the energy-addicted West.

It appears as though a new Gas-Opec, formed by the enemies of USrael is about to be created:

>>For the politicians of the industrial states it is an energy-political spectre of horrors: Russia's president Vladimir Putin and his Iranian colleague Mahmoud Ahmadinejad could meet in order to work out a cartel for their gas exports. It is indeed not far removed from reality. This scenario of a Gas-Opec, which could as well include additional countries such as Venezuela, Qatar, Libya and Algeria, and this could become a reality by the beginning of April (?), when there will be a meeting of the world's biggest Gas producers in Dohar, the Capital of the Emirates of Qatar on the Persian Golf<< – SZ, 20.3.2007, p19.

And should this gas-cartel be created, the first thing that would happen is that the exports would no longer be using US- Dollars but would be evaluated in other currencies. For a time, possibly in Euros, but even more possible in Roubles, so that the Russian currency would become the World's leading currency. This of course would lead to the total financial collapse of America, because America, like a vampire, does only thrive on the blood of other countries, who pay dearly for all their imports in US Dollars. Through the evaluation of all energy purchases in Dollars only, the decayed and bankrupt USA is in the position to print dollars, which the rest of the world is forced to exchange for good money.  That racket would be finished. Not long after the resulting dollar- crash, would the artificial Currency of the Euro of the >locust plague< come crashing down... 

The EU has no chance of survival, she will break apart in the fight for the goodwill of Russia in regards to deliveries of energy. For a warm house is more important than the many >Hurrahs< for the undying friendship with Israel, if with it you have to freeze.

Poland and Chechnya will be particularly responsible for the demise of the EU. They are stationing rockets, which are directed towards Russia. Moscow therefore is forced to consider serious measures for the rest of Europe. Who then would not be on Russia's side, because they cannot expect any deliveries of oil or gas from Israel or the USA?

There, where the rockets are stationed and that are directed at Russia, runs, so the Ex-Minister of foreign affairs, Fischer, the >Great Divide< of Europe.

>>Exactly in this question it will happen, that the bilateral behaviour – of Poland and Chechnya – is threatening to split Europe along the same >Great Divide< as the war in Iraq has worked. In the meantime Moscow is busy playing the game of ''divide and rule'', while it uses Europe's dependency on Russian oil- and gas deliveries. While the EU is blocked by Poland's stubborn Hardline Government and no new contract of partnership with Russia can be achieved, Russia makes contracts with individual EU-states, as was recently the case with Greece and Bulgaria.<< – J. Fischer, SZ, 1.4.2007, p2.

The end of the EU has become visible.

It is simply wonderful, how the powers of darkness have to give way to the dawn of a new epoch. It is breathtaking to watch how the moloch of the EU implodes into itself and the centre of human persecution, the BDR is being swept away into the deep.

The ideals of Savonarola and Ahmadinejad, not to allow any more lies of Yahweh, to free the world from the yoke of the mind- and multicultural terrors, put wings on the thoughts of mankind, for they already hear the approaching sound of fanfares of the wonderful new time of freedom.


Top | Home

©-free 2007 Adelaide Institute