Wacko’s
World by David Brockschmidt
Manny
Waks, one of the Jewish B’nai B’rith’s Anti Defamation Commission
publication editors, and/or one of his front men had a go at my article that
appeared in Adelaide Institute’s Newsletter No 329
May 2007: ‘Richard Toye,
Sir Winston Churchill, Sir Martin Gilbert and the end of Lies’.
Again
it looks as if these types of journalists suffer from the selective memory
syndrome and in this case it has gotten the better of them.
Let’s
address the points Manny Waks makes in his 2007 submission about me:
- Yes,
Brockschmidt has read Adolf Hitler‘s Mein
Kampf, Der Mythos des 20. Jahrhunderts written by the National Sozialistische Deutsche
Arbeiter Partei-NSDAP ideologue with a nice Jewish-German name, Alfred
Rosenberg; The Goebbels Diaries,
1933-45, and much more literature written and published during the
Third Reich. I have read and reflected on all of it at a time when your
father was still jumping over the fence with you.
Manny,
you asked me if I had forgotten what Hitler wrote, and to that I say it is not
important what political leaders wrote in their younger years, but what they
say, write and act on when they are in power, especially during times of war.
- It
was not German propaganda regarding Stalin’s plan to attack Germany on 6
July 1941 and steam-roll the rest of Europe right up to the Atlantic in
order to advance the communist world revolution. This is a very well
documented historical fact and it explains Hitler’s desperate attempt to
make peace with the western allies in order to have a free hand to
neutralise Stalin’s plan and smash Bolshevism in Soviet Russia.
- Manny,
I think you have conveniently forgotten to read the following books and
Stalin’s speeches while he was in power. All that I mention here is
confirmed. In order to overcome your historical information gap I shall
mention again the books, plans and speeches you need to read in order to
make a competent historical judgment.
a.
Martin
Allen: The Hitler–Hess Deception
b.
Joachim
Hoffmann: Stalin’s War of Extermination
c.
Victor
Suvorow: Icebreaker
d.
Victor
Suvorow: The Day M
e.
Werner
Maser: Der Wortbruch. Here we find
Stalin’s famous secret speech before his generals, given at the Frunse
Military Academy, Moscow, in 1940.
f.
General
Wassilewski’s plan to attack Germany May 1941
g.
Marshall
Schukow’s plan to steamroll Europe between May and 6 July 1941.
h.
Gerd Schulze-Blumhof:
Der Krieg der viele Väter
hatte.
i.
Albert
Weeks: Stalin’s Other War. Soviet
Grand Startegy 1939 to 1941. This book includes Stalin’s secret speech
to his politbureau given on 19 August 1939.
j.
Erkki
Hautamaki: Finnland in the Whirlwind.
k.
Hitler’s
Tabletalks
of 1936-1945, published by DTV.
- This
is, of course, only the tip of the information iceberg proving that
Germany’s attack on Soviet Russia was a pre-emptive strike, similar to
Israel’s so-called Six-Day-War in 1967. I was there, Manny, risking my
life for Erez Israel. Where were you?
- If
you want to take on Revisionist scholars and historians you had better
make certain you have done your homework, or you can end up with egg on
your face. Revisionists work with facts, not with faction and/or fiction.
- So,
what do you say in response, Manny? We are all eyes and ears. Please
educate us, will you? As long as you shoot from the lip and not from the
hip, as long as you present fire and waterproof facts, not faction,
fiction, opinions and heresay, we are happy to revise everything we write.
Every thinking person should revise, and we are sure you do just that.
That, of course, will make you a Revisionist. So welcome on board, Manny,
for the sake of truth in history.
- Let’s
stop playing the good, the bad and the ugly game. Political correctness,
which is nothing else but intellectual terrorism, is suffocating sensible
historical thinking through constant info-tainment and disinformation
pumped into people’s brains 24-hours a day by our mass media. The west
is turning into an “Axis of Willing Morons”.
- Last
but not least, for you and your colleagues who are thinking of pulling the
antisemite, racist, hater, Nazi, and Holocaust denier card on me, may I
offer you two more book titles for the betterment and further education of
you and your organisation before you get back to me with the facts. Peter
Schaeffer: Jesus and the Talmud, Princeton University Press, 2005; Michael
Kellog: The Russian Roots of Nazism.
White Emigres and the Making of
National Socialism, 1917-45. Cambridge University Press 2006.
Remember, Manny, knowledge is power and the Internet is the weapon of
Revisionist mass instruction.
_______________________________
History’s
Memory Holes by David Brockschmidt
The
official Holocaust-Shoah history, taught world-wide in schools and
universities, is like the Ozone holes above the North and South Poles. They
shift constantly, getting bigger or smaller, according to the needs of the
Holocaust-Shoah industry.
Let’s
start again with the victim figures for Auschwitz I-Stammlager and Auschwitz
II-Birkenau. According to the International War Crimes Tribunal, Nurnberg in
1945-46, the French submitted a victim figure of 8 million, which is only
related to the Auschwitz camps. The same applies to the following victim
figures: 4 million deaths as alleged by the Soviet Union, which were
officially recognized by the Nurnberg War Crimes Tribunal, and remained valid
until 1989. Then the official figures for Auschwitz were reduced by the Polish
authorities to one million. Because of world-wide Jewish pressure and
protests, the Polish president, Lech Walensa, issued an order to increase the
victim figure from one million to 1.5 million.
Today, the actual Auschwitz plaques carry the figure 1.-1.5 million.
In
May 2002 the chief editor, Fritjof Meyer, of Germany’s left-wing Der
Spiegel, which is Europe’s largest news magazine, published an article
in the Osteuropa, titled ‘Die
Todeszahlen von Auschwitz’, wherein he reduced the figures even further, by
another one million, to approximately 500,000, of those 360,000 were gassed.
As
the victim figures have shrunk so dramatically so have the size of the Zyklon
B gas insertion holes in the underground homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz
II-Birkenau, Krema II and III. According to the ‘Pope’ of Holocaust-Shoah
history, Professor Robert-Jan van Pelt, the four holes in the ceiling of Krema
II, mortuary I, were reduced by van Pelt from 700x700mm2 to approximately
50x50mm round, the size of a tennis ball.
These
four gas insertion holes were also ‘moved’ from the middle of the ceiling
next to the underground concrete columns, and then to the edge of the roof!
Further,
van Pelt informs his readers that before the Nazis destroyed the underground
mortuary-gas chamber, the four tennis ball-size holes were filled with cement
and then blown up. Does that make any sense?
To
his credit, one should say that in his book Auschwitz:
From 1270 to the Present, published in 1996, at pages 363-64, he admits
that the so-called homicidal gas chamber at Auschwitz-Stammlager was a
re-construction, built after World War Two, symbolically representing what
happened at Auschwitz II-Birkenau, where supposedly the real homicidal gas
chambers operated. Fritjof Meyer, of course, has changed not only the victim
figures from 1.-1.5 million to approx 500,000, as previously mentioned but
also transferred van Pelt’s homicidal mass gassings outside of Auschwitz II-Birkenau
camp into two farm houses – the red and white house, or Bunker I and II. In
an unpublished section of his essay, which Meyer gave to historian Werner
Maser, the latter quotes Meyer by saying that there is no historical proof
that these two farm houses ever existed.
So,
here we go again, the story is continually changing. Now let’s have a look
at what another eminent Holocaust-Shoah historian, Professor Deborah Lipstadt
has to contribute to this historical matter.
Professor
Lipstadt used the building plans of the SS Bauleitung – construction office
– of Auschwitz-Birkenau, which ‘the stupid Nazis forgot to burn’. She
calls them ‘the blueprints of genocide’. Now, all of a sudden, the holes
are not on top of the alleged homicidal gas chamber ceiling anymore but have
been moved to a side wall and turned into air vents of the underground
facility. According to the plans these air vents, which really existed, could
never have been used as Zyklon B gas insertion holes.
Then
another change occurs as Professor Lipstadt continues her research. She
reports on discovering in the underground mortuary, windows which could only
be opened from the outside. On photos we have seen Mortuary I was nearly
underground and there are no visible windows at all! Lipstadt’s
‘blueprints of genocide’ do not show them either. How these non-visible
underground windows could be accessed and opened from the outside remains a
mystery, indeed a miracle.
It
took these eminent Holocaust-Shoah historians more than 60 years to come up
with such contradictory research results, but at the same time telling the
world that the Holocaust-Shoah is the most researched piece of history in the
history of mankind.
Another
controversy regarding the underground mortuary I at Krema II raised by
Professor Lipstadt is the conversion of the body chute where the corpses were
slid down into the mortuary awaiting cremation. She points out that this chute
was converted into steps and this proves that the victims walked to their
death. The conversion from chute into steps is shown in the plans, but there
may be another explanation for this. It seems never to have occurred to
anybody post World War Two, especially during the typhoid epidemics in the
camp, which not only affected the prisoners but also staff and medical
personnel, that these steps could have been used to carry corpses on a
stretcher into the mortuary instead of sliding them down the chute. The latter
operation could have been more efficient.
The
factual evidence provided by van Pelt and Lipstadt and the contradictions it
contains indicates that their version of homicidal mass gassings at Auschwitz
II-Birkenau has more holes than a Swiss cheese!
This
is, in my opinion, shoddy investigation. It is only water on the mills of
Nazis and of Holocaust deniers who say: “It is better to be a Holocaust
denier than a Holocaust liar”.
Eminent
Holocaust-Shoah historian, the late Raul Hilberg, told the world just before
his death in 2007:
“The
Holocaust has only been researched by twenty per cent so far. The Revisionist
historians and scholars are actually helpful for us because they force us to
have another look so we can revise our own research and results”.
May
I suggest to Professor Robert-Jan van Pelt and Professor Deborah Lipstadt, and
all the other official Holocaust-Shoah historians, to go back to work and
honour Professor Raul Hilberg’s suggestion to tackle the other 80 per cent
the unresearched part of the Holocaust-Shoah.
It
has taken these official court historians over 60 years to come up with lots
of contradictions within their 20 per cent research of the topic, which means
it could take another 280 years in order to have the Holocaust-Shoah fully
researched, if they get it right next time!
I
personally believe it is a scandal using Holocaust liars – like the Swiss
Benjamin Wilkomirski who said he was in Auschwitz II-Birkenau and is a
Holocaust survivor but actually had never left Switzerland. Professor Deborah
Lipstadt is still telling the world that the contribution of such liars like
Wilkomirski – and there are hundreds of them – is still a valuable source
of information for teaching Holocaust-Shoah history. It seems that ‘true
lies’ rule supreme. I recall Jewish activist, Professor Eli Wiesel, when
questioned by his Rabbi while writing one of his books: ‘But is it true,
Eli?’ Wiesel’s response was: ‘Sometimes truth are lies, and lies are
truth’.
The
other option in order to shorten the research of the 80 per cent unresearched
part of the Holocaust-Shoah, would be to agree with Fritjof Meyer’s 2002
report and/or Gitta Sereny who in 2001 told the world that Auschwitz I and II
were not death or extermination camps at all.
That,
of course, would bring people into conflict with the laws in many countries,
especially Europe, that protect the official version of the Holocaust-Shoah
narrative, regardless of what Meyer and Sereny have written. You would be
prosecuted either as a Holocaust liar and/or a Holocaust denier. The
‘logic’ of these lawmakers is simple regarding the official Holocaust-Shoah
version: 1 + 1 = 6. If you don’t
believe that, regardless of what the evidence shows, they can arrange to give
you at least five years of recreation and rehabilitation behind bars.
So
much for freedom of expression and freedom to pursue scientific and historical
research in what is termed the democratic world.
It
is Galileo Galilee and Giordano Bruno all over again.
Henry
Ford said “History is bunk”. Let’s try to find truth in history through
an historical example, naming the Turkish-Armenian Holocaust: “The Turks say
it did not happen. Right?! – which makes the Turks in the eyes of the
Armenians ‘Holocaust deniers’. The Armenians say: ‘It did happen’,
which makes the Armenians in the eyes of the Turks ‘Holocaust liars. Right?!
So
Professors Lipstadt and van Pelt, let’s go back to work, kick some dust and
find truth in history. People don’t want to believe anymore, they have a
right to know.
