ISSN
1440-9828
June 2008
No 386
www.adelaideinstitute.org
*BALANCE*BEAUTY*TRUTH*
Voice
of Palestine
Indonesian
Society for Palestine Freedom
___________________
Freedom
and Return:
Palestine
and 60 Years of Ethnic Cleansing
14-15
May 2008,
University of Indonesia, Jakarta
www.voiceofpalestine.net
mail@voiceofpalestien.net
__________________________________________
Fredrick
Töben
The
Oppression of a People
Palestinian
Right of Return:
Its Legal and Moral Principles
______
1.
Introduction – science and values
Nothing in life is
perfect, only God is perfect, and so it follows that scientific research does
not produce absolute results but only approximations to some theory of truth.
Any scientist who does not append to his results a possible error becomes
absolute in his research and thus has developed an ideology.
The
post-Marxists-feminist, global warming/climate change Internationalists who
attempt to change human nature by fitting facts into a theoretical
scientific shroud stifles that creative impulses and kills the human
spirit.
In Iran I learned that
everything is religion, and everything is politics. However, in our ‘free
and democratic’ western world we believe we can separate and dissect
processes for the sake of discovering and inventing things that were not known
to us before, are independent of what we believe. In other words, if our
consciousness disappears, if individual humans die, the physical world
still exist without them, and that is the domain of science, but not only!
In
2000, South
African President, Tabo Mbeki, held an 13TH INTERNATIONAL AIDS CONFERENCE
DURBAN http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/news/durbspmbeki.htm.
He courageously resisted the Internationalists, and the multi-national
pharmaceutical industries from exploiting his people by justifiably
questioning the validity of the HIV=AIDS hypothesis. He had also invited
dissident AIDS researchers, Peter Duesburg, USA, and Eleni Eliopolous,
Australia.
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/news/tmspeech.htm
http://www.paradigmoverthrow.com/blog/nobelist-against-hiv-enters-court-drama.htm
President Mbeki was
subsequently vilified as an AIDS denier, in the USA by the financially
powerful AIDS lobby, which is so absolute in its statements. This
lobby performs in the same manner as those who propagated the
absolute ideology statements of Marxists: anyone who refuses to believe in their
HIV=AIDS hypothesis and offers proof to the contrary that HIV does not cause
AIDS, must be re-educated so as to see the error of his ways. For such
ideologues science becomes a religion, an absolute belief system – and in such
an environment scientific knowledge cannot grow and develop, it becomes
destroyed. Public vilification in this nature is encouraged by the international
media under the guise of “freedom and democracy”.
There always will be
numerous scientific fads advocated by absolutists who call themselves
scientists, but whose habit for some ulterior motive goes beyond merely
finding out the truth of a matter. They set out to save their theory and so
twist observable facts into it. Take the cosmological big-bang/black hole
theories that became popular 30 years ago. Only recently eminent scientist
Stephen Hawking admitted that his three decades’ work on black holes was
futile, which makes him a good scientist.
Remember
how those who perpetrated the 9:11 insider job claimed that it was an
'Arab terrorist' conspiracy against the USA, and those who refuse to believe
this official conspiracy theory are just 'conspiracy freaks'? It reminds me of
William Cooper who seeks to discredit those who refuse to accept official
conspiracy theories such as that 9:11 was done by Arab terrorists. In 1999 he
wrote: "Conspiracy theories are like blakc holes; they explain everything,
sucking in facts the way black holes suck in matter. And, like black holes, each
conspiracy theory is a portal to another universe that paradoxically resides
within our own. Everything you've ever known or experienced, no matter how
"meaningless," once it comes in contact with that universe, is
enveloped by it, and is then cloaked in sinister significance." With the
Black Hole theory gone, Cooper now needs to look for truth rather than label
individuals as "conspiracy theorists".
What is forgotten by
those who sneer at conspiracy theories is the physical fact that wherever two or
more individuals get together, a ‘conspiracy’ is afoot because it is in the
nature of the human beast to gather and smithy plans of action.
An
artist’s impression of a black hole
2.
Scientific uncertainty – astronomy & the electric universe
In
their 2005 book, Thunderbolt of the Gods: A radical reinterpretation of human
history and the evolution of the solar system – ISBN 0-9772851-0-3 - David
Talbott and Wallace Thornhill point
out how Isaac Newton’s force of gravity postulated space to be a vacuum. Now
we know the predominant force in the universe is not gravity but electricity,
meaning that solids, liquids and gases are joined by plasma.
The
Gravitation theory did not anticipate or explain electric fields in space. According
to the scientific method, if an hypothesis, if a theory’s predictions do not
come about, then that theory must be discarded and a new one adopted – and so
electric cosmology was born as a scientific discipline.
On
page 11 in their book they state: “Before new findings disproved
these beliefs, they were so “obviously true” as to discourage challenges. It
is easy to confuse theoretical assumption with fact. And today the tendency
often conceals a tacit belief that, despite the mistakes of previous
generations, we have the big picture right and the remaining task is
simply to tidy things up a bit. The actual situation in the sciences calls for
openness to new possibilities…”.
The
model of the electric universe results in not feeling disconnected from
what goes on in deep space and magnetic fields, are the proof of the existence
of the electric universe!
Donald
E Scott, in the introduction to his book, The Electric Sky,
Portland, Oregon, USA, 2006. ISBN 0-9772851-1-1, wrote in the first two
paragraphs; “A revolution is beginning in astronomy and cosmology that will
rival the one set off by Copernicus and Galileo. The stream of increasingly
bizarre pronouncements coming from astronomers and cosmologists has recently
encountered a series challenge. This challenge is led by a cadre of scientists
and engineers, several of whom were Nobel Prize winning pioneers. They are
offering simpler, verifiable explanations about the makeup and functioning of
the cosmos. Their new ideas, in more ways than one, are electrifying the
discourse in astrophysics.
The
defenders of the present cosmological realm are resisting this intrusion into
their once exclusive domain. But on-going discoveries about how electric plasma
behaves in space are relentlessly forcing dramatic changes in the way we view
the universe. The discipline of electric plasma physics – which
until lately has been outside the realm of astronomy – is quickly displacing
many of the outmoded theories of traditional cosmology and astrophysics. We now
know that cosmic space is full of electricity (electrical plasma) and over the
last several decades the study of this form of matter has developed into an
established body of scientific knowledge.”
Revisionists,
who are researching the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah, can readily relate to this
statement; which Revisionist cannot identify with the following:
”The stream of
increasingly bizarre pronouncements coming from astronomers and cosmologists has
recently encountered a serious challenge”.
And
what about the fact that all this had been foretold by the Serbian Nikola Tesla
whose inventions were stolen by the US and the man was persecuted...
After
the end of World War Two in 1945, Revisionist began
to challenge the Holocaust-Shoah, unlike that coming from astronomers and
cosmologists, these Historians and learned men, met with vicious
legal persecution, as that encountered by Copernicus and Galileo and
Kepler. All three compromised somewhat their world view when the blow-torch was
applied to them. Kepler escaped personal persecution but for that he had to
defend his mother from witchcraft charges.
Giordano
Bruno was burnt at the stake for refusing to recant, for refusing to compromise
with the civil authority that was acting on behalf of the Catholic church to
kill Bruno?
I
mention these facts so that current Revisionists and Historians, can
contexture their defamed reputation and personal suffering as something
that comes with their profession; being an independent and dissidenting
thinker can bring pain and gain.
That
facts keeps changing, as well as theories, and opinions, world views
are forever developing and evolving as more and more information comes
available, is a constant and continuing human brain development.
The historical myth called the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah began in the 1970s
when the word ‘holocaust’ was first used.
The
reporting of factual historical events and incidents as written in many
books, has given rise to the alleged detail of the German war machine
exterminating European Jewry in homicidal gas chambers during World War Two.
When Revisionists study closely what has been reported as both
factually/physically contains an element of truth, but then is augmented
by exaggerations and contradictions, which are backed up by outrageous
fabrications and monstrous lies as envisioned in the minds of personal,
unreliable witnesses . It is these lies that overwhelm any reader to
the point of responding emotionally and believing the incidents to be true.
A
number of European countries have enacted laws that protect such fabrications. Myths
and legends do contain an element of truth while too many of the
Holocaust-Shoah horror stories are merely intended to shame and
destroy the pride of the German people. Only by exposing the factual
truths, can Germans relieve themselves of the shame and blame that was placed
upon them, however, the courts of law have refused to listen to them. To this
day the re-education program implemented by the Jews, who alone, have committed
venal crimes for centuries, aim to get Germans to relinquish
themselves as Germans, who would then become a non-entity in the human
drama of survival at the expense of the Jews, who themselves, for over 2000
years had become non-entities throughout the world when their God dispersed
them from their supposedly promised land. The Jews and their willing
helpers who sustain and maintain this Holocaust-Shoah fabrications through legal
prosecution/persecution, in the name of some human rights. While the human
rights are being ignored of those who refuse to believe in such monstrous lies
that Germans systematically exterminated six million Jews in huge chemical
slaughterhouses.
3.
Legal and moral reflections
There
is a LAW that politicians especially call upon whenever they attempt
to introduce a cause, or find a cause, that has not been sufficiently explained
why that certain cause needs to be done, and which the people really
don't need or want. Whenever a ‘battle-of-the-wills’ between
individuals cannot be privately resolved through reasoned argument, a
recourse of last resort is going to court, ‘the law of the land’
to be settled; but when that happens on the world stage, we have a
physical punch-up, though a war. Hence my stressing of the
Anglo-American-Zionist bully-boy nature, and needless attack on Iraq, and
again, possibly soon on Iran.
Australia’s
legal system is based on British Common Law, under which an individual
has moral, social and legal responsibilities called duties. However, an
individual has no legal duties, to rescue, or save another person, in
distress, especially if done at the risk to one’s own life, is often
considered to be a hero who has fulfilled his moral duty towards another human
being.
There
are thinkers who reject the notion of morality. Ludwig Wittgenstein, a language
philosopher, invited Sir Karl Popper, a philosopher of science, to address one
of his seminars at Cambridge University. When he introduced his guest speaker,
Wittgenstein stated that if we would correctly used our language, then all
our problems would disappear.
To
that Popper responded: “What about moral problems?”
Wittgenstein
picked up a fire poker and waved it at Popper, exclaiming: “There are no moral
problems!"
Popper
responded: “What about the moral problem when a host threatens his visitor
with a fire poker?”
Wittgenstein
threw down the fire poker and stormed out of the room. Reports on this incident
vary, depending on whether you support Popper’s or Wittgenstein’s version of
events.
4.
British Common Law vs. European Civil Law
The
European legal system differs to that of the British Common Law, by means to
weaken Common Law to bring it in line with Civil Law. All too often the
basic difference is reflected in the fact that the former is
inquisitorial---where the judge participates in the investigative process that
aims to find the truth of a matter---while the latter is an adversarial process;
here the judge listens to opposing sides present a case, and then
he balances the facts, and at times, with help of precedent cases, draws
conclusions wherefrom to deliver a judgment.
This
difference of such a legal process reflects in human behaviour: for
example, in Germany, if a man is seen standing on his head in a public
place, people will stop and question why is he doing that?
In
England, if a man stands on his head in some city square, people will walk by
and merely utter: “He’s mad!”
The
Common law system protects an individual’s personal rights more so than does
the Civil Law system where the general well-being of society is highly valued.
Social unrest is quickly stifled in the latter, while in the former public
protests and dissent are tolerated as part of an individual’s rights as
long as such a protest remains non-violent and cannot be captured by the concept
of ‘sedition’, and then that person is criminalized.
Thoughts
are not yet criminalized within Common Law countries, such as in the United
Kingdom, the US and Canada, and other Commonwealth countries. I say ‘not
yet’ because we are well on the way to this; and the way it is done, is through
deception and through conceptual confusion whereby a conceptual prison is built
through stealth.
Canada
has pioneered the criminalizing of individuals on racial grounds. It is now
purely aimed at individual Europeans, such as Marc Lemire, who wish to
retain their cultural identity, are then labelled ‘Nazi’.
5.
Conceptual Prisons
Western
democracies pride themselves for having among their liberties, free
expression, which since the 1970s has slowly and subtly been withered away
through the use of manipulating certain words to alter the meaning of
certain human rights as a ‘discrimination’ .
In
many countries it now illegal to discriminate, which has always been a
human right, against anyone on grounds of race, ethnic background and
sexual preference. This has brought great confusion, and much
worry to those who are seriously concerned, and motivated, about being fair and
just to their fellow humans.
The
concept of ‘discrimination’ is now a political tool to subdue
the critical thinkers, because the act of thinking has become an act
of discrimination. Far better is it to use the concept of justice when
there is a need to settle a battle-of-the-wills, as judges do when they hand
down judgments that are ‘policy’ judgments, which prevents opening the
flood-gates of litigation.
The
concept of ‘multi-cultural’ is a most deceptive term for
‘multi-racial’. Different races and ethnic group are
"multi-cultural" functioning in all societies, otherwise its
fabric disintegrates into a dominate mono-culture society.
Add that concept
to a ‘democracy’ and we have a political mish-mash spin-off that
does not serve the people very well. For example, the USA model of
democracy has not helped the people in Iraq where democracy is in variance
to their culture of thousands of years, and that is why the People’s Republic
of China has adopted ‘democracy’, with its China-style!
6.
Democracy and free expression
In
so-called free western liberal democracies, if you refuse to believe in the
‘Holocaust’ story you are defamed, abused and/or imprisoned:
1.Hater – free
v hate speech; 2.Holocaust denier; 3.Antisemite; 4.Racist; 5. Neo-Nazi; 6.
Xenophobe; 7. Nationalist; 8. Terrorist
Anyone
who compares President George Bush with Adolf Hitler is a fool!
In
the recent past Jewish groups around the world, and those enslaved to the Jewish
thought impulses have followed Professor Alan Dershowitz’s example and split
the concept ‘free expression’ into ‘free speech’ and ‘hate speech’.
These
defamatory concepts are used to shut up an individual and stifle open debate on
one of the most contentious historical topics – the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah:
Hater
= someone I disagree with – hate literature = Talmud.
Holocaust
denier = challenge the truthfulness of a story and no room for denial.
Antisemite
= language concept = not against Arabs.
Racist
= wishing to belong to one’s own folk/cultural group
Nazi
= National Zionist – Patriot/Nationalist vs Internationalist / predatory
capitalism / consumerism/hedonism
Xenophobe
= why fear foreigners?
Terrorist
are called Freedom Fighters by those who believe their violent cause is just.
The
German people are quite good at vilifying themselves. They must be about the
only nation on earth that vilifies, no, curses more likely, its own war dead.
Any nation that does not honour its own war dead is morally and intellectually
bankrupt and has sold its soul to the Devil.
Germans
are re-educated slaves to international predatory capitalism and
hedonism/nihilism
Germans
vilify, defame, curse their war dead as ‘Nazi murderers’. Why do they do
this? Only if a people do not have any self-respect can such shameful behaviour
come about. But then I forget that for over 60 years, since the end of World War
Two, Germany is still an occupied country without a peace treaty, where media
censorship ensures that any positive German element that emerged during 1933-45
must remain suppressed. Re-education has been a success for those who hate
Germans and anything they have produced.
Some
German judges are Freemasons; some Germans are patriotic nationalists who, for
whatever reason, like to greet their friends with an outstretched arm, and some
add the words: “Sieg Heil”. Both Freemasons and German nationalists use the
same greeting-salute, and the difference is that judges criminalize nationalists
for using the “Hitler-salute’! Horst Mahler knows all about this kind of
hypocritical justice = injustice…
But
there is more. A number of internationalists talk about “the fascist global
state” and US President, George W Bush, is often called a “fascist”.
Combine this with the fact that Jewish Holocaust-Shoah documentaries have been
flooding our media for decades, and that so-called “Holocaust deniers” are
routinely imprisoned, then, Australian intellectual Peter Myers asks:
“How
credible is it then to argue that Nazis and Fascists are running the world? It
is not. The Political Correctness and Thought Control of our time is Left, not
Right. Gay Marriage, the Feminist sex-war against men, Open Border immigration
& trade, Hollywood decadence, and the World Court - all these would be
anathema to Hitler. Why then say that he’s running the show? This kind of
analysis is not only intellectually erroneous and misleading, but also shows a
lack of courage.”
Remember,
Adolf Hitler’s only crime was to disconnect from the international capitalist
system, just as Iraq, Iran, North Korea and Zimbabwe did. We now know that
internationalists hate people to be free of financial enslavement.
Malaysians
and Indonesians, among others, have their story to tell about George Soros and
his global Open Society institutes’ activities!
How to lose
an argument - pull out the NAZI card!
Pulling
out the NAZI card to silence your opponent
Bill
O’Reilly versus Godwin’s Law, which states that as an argument grows longer,
the probability of a NAZI analogy being made approaches one. As a corollary, the
person to use the analogy loses the argument. Bill O’Reilly may never have won
an argument.
7.
The 9:11 tragedy
Since
9 September 2001 a new dialectic conceptual trick/deception has been imposed on
the world: international terrorism.
Remember
what happened at the UN conference on Racism & Xenophobia, on 28 August-7/8
September 2001 in Durban, South Africa?
Israel
stood condemned as an apartheid, Zionist, racist, European colonial entity. This
shocked the so-called liberal, democratic free western world to its foundations
for whom the creation of the state of Israel is the atonement for evil
perpetrated upon Jews during World War II – the period called the Jewish
Holocaust-Shoah.
Four
days later, 9:11 happened where a bunch of so-called Arab terrorists attacked
the USA, and the whole Muslim world stood condemned, Islam was branded a
terrorist religion.
Now
we know more about the so-called false-flag operations, that 9:11 was an insider
job, that 7:7 London was an insider job, that the Bali bombing was a warning
shot to Australia to stay on-side with the Anglo-American-Zionist world warfare
operations in the Middle East that are primarily, but not only, still sustaining
the State of Israel – all at the expense of the Palestinian people.
8.
Moral/ intellectual courage/integrity
Only
one world statesman/government dared to challenge the truthfulness of the Jewish
Holocaust-Shoah – the Islamic Republic of Iran’s president, Dr Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, and on 11-12 December 2006 he held a conference that aimed to
REVIEW matters related to the HOLOCAUST.
All
liberal western democracies had politicians and academics crying out in agony at
the prospect of anyone daring to question the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah.
The
President of Columbia University shamed himself and the USA by openly insulting
Dr Ahmadinejad who had been invited to address that university.
Anyone who insults a guest is breaking the fundamental moral law of
hospitality, which imposes upon a host certain duties to retain basic forms of
civil behaviour – meaning that it is immoral, bad, outright evil, to insult
your guest before a world audience.
The
Iranian position about its moral right and duty to question/review the
historical event that is the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah is quite clear. All
historical events are questioned on a regular basis – are revised as new
information comes to hand, as locked archives are opened. All thinking
individuals are constantly revising their stock of knowledge because our
knowledge about every aspect of life always grows.
Dr
Ahmadinejad: “Is the Holocaust not an historical events?”
Answer:
“Yes.”
Dr
Ahmadinejad: “Then, why not like all historical events, question and
re-evaluate the Holocaust?”
Answer:
“Hater, Holocaust denier, Antisemite, Nazi, Racist., Xenophobe, Terrorist.”
As
early as the 1990s it was Robert Faurisson who pushed the idea that countries
under attack from the Anglo-American-Zionist forces would be wise to use the
Revisionist argument on the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah as a cheap but devastating
weapon. In a letter on January 18, 1991, to the Iraq ambassador in
Paris, he wrote: "Le révisionnisme est l'arme atomique du pauvre -
Revisionism is the nuclear weapon of the poor"; in: Robert Faurisson,
Ecrit révisionnistes 1974-1998, vol. III, p. 1253.
9.
Sacrilege
Why
is the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah a taboo topic in the free and democratic western
world where free expression is the hallmark of political expression? Why is it
that in this world anything can be questioned, ridiculed and denied? Anyone can
be free to deny the existence of God, but not free to question the veracity of
the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah?
One
reason is that if there was such freedom, then the war crimes perpetrated by the
Allies during WW II would re-surface – and this would liberate Germans from a
false guilt trip.
For
daring to speak openly about this historical taboo topic a number of
individuals, free-thinkers, dissenters, Revisionists, have been and are
imprisoned, especially in democratic Germany and Austria: Sylvia Stolz, Germar
Rudolf, Ernst Zündel,, Gerd Honsik, Wolfgang Fröhlich, and soon in France
Georges Theil. Both Theil and Fröhlich attended the Teheran Holocaust
conference.
In
Australia anyone who refuses to believe in the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah is not
immediately criminalized, but instead an economic death sentence is imposed. For
example, Revisionist Richard Krege attended the December 2006 Teheran
conference, then upon his return home to Canberra, was dismissed from his
government job at Air Services Australia, a job he had held for almost ten
years.
In
1999 I spent seven months in Mannheim prison because during my second world
Revisionist research trip I visited German judges and public prosecutors to
learn at first hand what their laws were all about – and also to find out for
myself what kind of individuals these Holocaust enforcers were. I found out at
first had – I was arrested in a public prosecutor’s office, a man whom I had
visited two years earlier in 1997.
From
this experience I learned that German judges write up court proceedings
subjectively, i.e. there is no objective reporting and matters raised in court
are not absolutely privileged as is the case in Common Law countries. This means
you cannot defend yourself because by presenting a vigorous defence, as is the
case in Common Law countries, this is regarded by the judges as evidence of your
guilt. By not showing contrition/remorse at refusing to believe in the Jewish
Holocaust-Shoah, you are compounding your guilt.
10.
Evil Germans and Adolf Hitler
Particularly
in Germany there is an inordinate fear that the National Socialists will rise
again. But such a fear is merely an excuse for those in power to remain
unaccountable in their continued dismemberment of the German nation. After all,
just over 60 years after the end of World War two, Germany remains a defeated
country that still has no peace treaty with the countries with whom it signed an
“unconditional surrender” on 7/8 May 1945.
Germans
have been re-educated through the myth and lies that make up the Jewish
Holocaust-Shoah narrative. The German world-view is now self-destructive in that
it consists of consumerism/hedonism/nihilism. Germans may have a good time, find
pleasure in any shape and form, self-destruct through drugs, but they dare not
ask basic historical questions.
Anything
good that came out of National Socialism is regarded as evil. Recently we have
seen a frenzy of dismissals of public figures because they crossed the taboo
line. For example, Eva Herman, a talk-show host stated that during the National
Socialist years motherhood was highly valued. She lost her job. Another
game-show host was instantly dismissed from her job at Pro 7, a German
television network owned by a Jew. What was her crime? While talking with a man
on the phone, she let slip that Arbeit macht frei – work liberates
– this being the motto on the Auschwitz concentration camp gates.
Now,
the Olympic Torch relay was an idea that came from Adolf Hitler and the National
Socialists and it was first introduced during the 1936 Berlin Olympic Games. Any
German who is proud of this fact will be charged for condoning/lessening “the
crimes” of the National Socialists. This is the madness that has afflicted the
German people. They must deny their own heritage, their traditions, their very
existence.
11.
The Jewish Holocaust-Shoah – kills thinking
To
this day Germans apologize to the world for being Germans because they believe
that their parents/grandparents committed the systematic murder of European
Jewry where the murder weapon was a homicidal gas chamber, or as Prof Robert
Faurisson called it – ‘massive chemical slaughterhouses’.
That
this is all nonsense can be read up in Prof Arthur Butz’s classic of 1976: The
Hoax of the Twentieth Century, and Germar Rudolf’s 2004 book: Lecturer
on the Holocaust.
Interestingly,
during Germar Rudolf’s 2006 trial at Mannheim, the judge permitted Germar to
submit evidence from his Lectures on the Holocaust, but then promptly put
the book on the Index of banned books in Germany.
Recently
a Mr Dirk Zimmermann sent three copies of Rudolf’s book to three prominent
public figures, then promptly turned himself in to the local police for having
committed a crime. His reason for doing this, he says, is that he must have the
freedom to doubt the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah.
Zimmermann
is right, of course, because if you are not permitted to doubt, then you cannot
begin critically to think about any historical topic, you cannot independently
think about anything at all.
Further,
the moral virtue of truth-telling is criminalized by the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah
enforcers in Germany and elsewhere in the world, even in Australia. This denial
of truth as a defence in any proceedings is a massive blow to humanity itself.
12.
TRUTH is no defence
Truth
is not a defence in any Jewish Holocaust-Shoah trials. Any society that throws
truth away as a guiding principle will ultimately destroy itself. Where there is
no truth concept, trust cannot flourish and relationships break down.
Germar
Rudolf’s 2006 Mannheim trial was also the first time that a Revisionist had
made a full submission to court without this attracting extra punishment. This
partially fulfils the Common Law principle of Natural Justice, i.e. giving
someone a right of reply to allegations levelled against them.
Rudolf
did not do what Ernst Zündel did in his trial at Mannheim - make a final
concluding submission to court. So the judge was rather lenient in imposing a 30
months sentence on Rudolf, especially considering that Rudolf is one of the
leading Revisionists in the world today. His ‘Holocaust Handbook’ series of
over 21 volumes contains the Revisionists’ theoretical ammunition that
Holocaust-Shoah believers has to challenge in order to sustain the veracity of
their own narrative.
In
his closing submission in open court Zündel compounded his ‘guilt’ by
stating that were any evidence forthcoming, for example, evidence that proved
the existence of the homicidal gas chambers, then he would be quite prepared to
change his views on the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah. In Common Law countries anything
stated in open court is privileged and cannot attract criminal sanction as
happens in German courts.
By
making such a statement to the court, Zündel of course challenged the very core
of the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah belief system/ideology/religion. Such a
‘violation’ then attracted the maximum penalty of five years prison.
Imagine, this man is a peace-loving man who has done no harm to anyone. All he
wants to do in life is to clear his German people from this guilt-trip called
the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah.
Physical
evidence: Fredrick Töben at Auschwitz-Birkenau, Krema II
One
key proof of the murder weapon-homicidal gas chamber narrative is the existence
of gas insertion holes at Krema II, Auschwitz-Birkenau. In 1997 I visited the
site and physically looked for these holes – and could not find them. During
the early 1990s the death figure was reduced from 4 million to 1.-1.5 million
but the total of 6 million deaths remained the same. Then Fritjof Meyer in 2002
stated the gassings did not occur at Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp but
in two farmhouses outside of the camp – Bunker I and II. Where exactly these
farm houses were located has not been determined!
13.
The Palestinian Holocaust – and the myth of the Jewish people
Everything
I have mentioned so far about the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah and how Germans,
Revisionists and anyone who refuses to believe in this narrative is persecuted,
is relevant to what has happened to the Palestinian people since the founding of
the Zionist, racist, European colonial entity called Israel.
There
is even a parallel with the growing 9:11 Truth Movement where individuals who
are familiar with the Holocaust-Shoah narrative can see a similar pattern of
deception operating.
Likewise,
the various support movements for Palestine have individuals that are
gatekeepers whose job it is to keep out of such movement so-called ‘Holocaust
deniers’.
Although
all peoples need their myths and legends, the myth that directly impacts on the
Palestinians is the myth of the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah and the myth of the
Jewish people. Recently Shlomo Zand published in Hebrew, in Israel: When and How
Was the Jewish People Invented. He makes the point that there is indeed a Jewish
religion but there is no Jewish peoples as such.
For
example he states that the Jewish communities in Spain were originally
Arabic-speaking peoples who converted to Judaism as they drove out the
Christians. He claims the Biblical Exodus is fiction, a myth, and hence the
Israeli national identity that goes back to these times is a pretext that merely
justifies the Palestinian genocide.
Likewise
it is with the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah, which has become Israel’s prime
propaganda weapon - being used as a sword and as a shield - and by exposing it
as a massive fabrication this will liberate the Palestinian peoples.
Decades
ago Ernst Zündel stated that if only Revisionists would be consulted about
their sphere of expertise, then here is a relatively cheap weapon to be used by
Palestinians finally to regain that which has been taken from them through
horrible means.
14.
The Holocaust-Shoah has no reality in space and time – only in memory
It
has become common now for Palestine friendship organisations to spring up all
over the western democracies. We have such in Australia, but many are run by
Jews and their helpers who make certain that so-called ‘Holocaust deniers’
are refused membership.
This
means that there is an attempt to incorporate the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah as a
myth for Jews within the Palestinian peoples’ history. But there is more. Now
in Israel there are ultra Orthodox Jewish communities whose women fully cover
their face – burka - something that is not in their tradition, but is a purely
Islamic tradition.
The
Holocaust-Shoah is a death cult that is uninspiring and ugly. It incites hatred
against the German people and anything to do with Germany and German culture –
much like the Palestinians have been vilified over these past 60 years.
The
Holocaust-Shoah is slowly exterminating Germans as a people, as a Volk. To this
day Germans do not honour their dead of World War Two. The younger generation of
Germans is set out to have a good time – drugs, sex and rock’n roll – and
to consume goods they don’t need, and to have holidays, and to shun anything
that reminds them of the rich German cultural heritage.
Germans
are sick people because they feel unnecessarily guilty about what they are
alleged to have done to Jews during World War Two. No-one denies that Jews
suffered, but they were not the only ones.
14.
Beauty*Truth*Honour*Justice*Discipline
1.
The following is an embodiment of the Übermensch idea of National Socialism’s
concept of Beauty, Grace, Modesty.
2.
It does not mean any kind of superiority over another person or culture but
rather pushing oneself to the obvious innate human limits.
3.
All humans participate in life-giving processes and the following act is a
celebration of the Godliness within all of us.
4.
Mind and body are in harmony within the self and with that of another human
being.
5.
It is a pity some Jews, Christians and Muslims shy away from celebrating
such ideals – but understandable because today everything in our now-now world
culture has been trivialized and sexualized for the sake of the consumer
pleasure dollar.
Few
younger individuals appreciate that developing their human potential requires
discipline and hard work, and of course some innate talent, that becomes the
driving force sustaining such work for a life-time.
THE
BEAUTY OF MIND-BODY BALANCE
The
Ugliness and Evil that is the War in Israel-Palestine; a Palestinian boy
cradling his mother as she dies from a bullet. So, too, is the Holocaust-Shoah
an ugly, evil death cult spreading hatred against Germans and justifying the
Palestinian Holocaust.
_____________________________________________
No
more wars for Israel
Debating
the Holocaust Shoah
Reality in memory Persecution
of Töben Töben's
1999 arrest in Germany
There
is HOPE
