As
surprising as it may sound, the only intentional mass extermination program in
the concentration camps of WW2 was targeted at Germans. From April, 1945 five
million Germans were rounded up after surrendering, and deliberately starved
until well over one million had died, in French and American-run concentration
camps[1] - an event soon erased from the history books. There was, in
contrast, never a centrally-coordinated Nazi program of exterminating Jews in
Germany. Lethal gas chambers did not function in German labour-camps, that's
just an illusion. The traditional Holocaust story has developed out of rumours,
misunderstandings, and wartime propaganda.
From
stories pre-dating the Second World War to the Nuremberg Trials which gave
official sanction to the notion, to subsequent trials, books and films, we
have had it imprinted on our collective psyche. In most of Europe now, it is a
thoughtcrime to believe what you have just read, punishable by imprisonment,
so think carefully before deciding to read on.
The
real experts on this subject are - in jail, so maybe you will put up with
hearing my view instead?
Europe
needs, more than anything else, a truth and reconciliation forum to get to the
bottom of these matters, and to try and exorcise the demonic hate-images. Ever
more nations are passing laws that prohibit citizens from expressing doubt -
Germany, France, Austria, Poland, Romania, Belgium, Switzerland, Canada,
Australia and New Zealand.
Collectively,
we need to work through our despair, rage, and ideas of blame, to try and
access the real historical record.
Cyanide
at Auschwitz
Zyklon-B
was used at Auschwitz, as an insecticide. It was vital in attempting to
maintain hygiene that mattresses be deloused. Cyanide gas was adsorbed onto
clay-type granules, designed to make the deadly gas as 'safe' as it could be.
If you go to Auschwitz today, you can't see any authentic gas chambers. You
see stone huts, and experts have testified that they could not have been used
to gas people, owing to problems in sealing them up (Zyklon-B released its
cyanide gas rather slowly[2]).
In
1988 the scientific team of Fred Leuchter (a US execution-expert 'Mr Death' in
gas-chamber technology) visited Poland, and concluded that the Auschwitz 'gas
chambers' could not possibly have functioned in the alleged manner - i.e.,
they were not gas chambers[3].
In
the following years, others would confirm the accuracy of his seminal, 'Leuchter
Report'. The German chemist Germar Rudolf, who worked at the Max Plank
institute for Solid State Physics, is now in jail, because he likewise
measured the high levels of the cyanide in the walls of the de-lousing
chambers. It happens that this gas bonds permanently with iron, and iron is
present in all the cement etc of stone walls.
Whereas,
he found none in the walls of what were supposed to be the 'gas chambers'
which were mainly shower units. He thereby confirmed the work of Leuchter who
likewise only found remains of the cyanide gas-insecticide in the delousing
chambers.[4]
After
Rudolf's report was published in 1993, he lost his job and was prevented from
completing his doctorate, then a few years later he was given a jail sentence.
He is now in a high-security prison near Stuttgart, for the crime of not
finding cyanide in the 'gas chambers[5],' echoing Leuchter's cyanide residue
investigations. [6] When a chemist is put in jail, for replicating the result
of another - in Germany of all places, the nation which invented chemical
procedure then the farce cannot continue for much longer[7] (The gas chambers
were conveniently located east of Germany behind the Iron Curtain to make them
inaccessible to westerners, which helped the myth to flourish).
The
Leuchter results were almost too good to be true, with a three orders of
magnitude difference between the cyanide levels in the delousing chamber walls
(about one part per thousand) and those in the washing chambers (aka 'gas
chambers'), around one part per million. They are not published in any
peer-reviewed chemistry journal, for obvious reasons. The only way to hold a
debate on this subject appears to be in a courtroom, while being prosecuted!
It is hard to reach the calm condition necessary for replication of chemical
measurements. Nonetheless people have replicated the fundamental result[8],
and even folk with no interest in chemistry can appreciate the pretty blue
colour on the outside of the de-lousing chamber (where the Ferro cyanide has
seeped right through the wall) and its complete absence around the so-called
'gas chambers.' Let's face it, the case is established: the cyanide poison was
used where the German records state that it was used
for delousing mattresses, clothing etc - whereas it was not used where
the US and UK (at Nuremberg) alleged.
Tourists,
thirty million of them, have filed through 'Krema 1' at Auschwitz, with its
piteous piles of shoes, etc of the dead. This was reconstructed after the war
in 1946[9], a fact revealed 1992 by Dr. Franciszek Piper, the Senior Curator
and Director of Archives of the Auschwitz State Museum. The historic remains
from the camp are such things as shower-unit huts, a swimming pool and a
morgue. There was a camp orchestra, and quite a collection of pictures from
the camp art-classes,[10] although these cannot be shown in Germany or Poland,
on account of laws prohibiting the doubting of the Holocaust. Anne Frank of
'Diary' fame came to the camp in 1944 with her father who was ill. He was put
into the hospital there, and recovered, suggesting that he was decently looked
after.[11]
The
'gas chambers' at Auschwitz had water pipes in their ceilings, indicating that
they were designed as shower units. They generally lacked tight-seal doors,
which would have been essential, even though these were easy to install the
Leuchter report cited the absence of such seals as one reason why the alleged
'gas chambers' would never have functioned.
The
Arithmetic of Annihilation
The
primary argument put forward by Professor Arthur Butz in his classic text, The Hoax of the 20th Century was demographic: the Jews of Europe
were still there after the war and therefore had not been exterminated.
They
had generally moved eastwards, and once the Iron curtain came down in 1948 it
became difficult to count them. Some two million emigrated from Europe, both
to Palestine and America. Between 3 12 and 4 million Jews had lived in all the
lands controlled by Adolf Hitler [12], of which an upper limit of one million
died in WW2: the figure of a million dead, 'while possible, seems rather high
to me', concluded Butz [13],[14] - a figure to be contrasted with ten million
Germans who died during and just after that war[15]. If somewhere around fifty
million people died during WW2, that Jewish mortality comprised some 2% of
this total: which is about the average for Europe, i.e. no great excess of
Jews died in WW2. Almost half a million Jews dwelt in Germany around 1930
(around 1% of the population), and by 1939 many had emigrated, some 270,000
remaining [16].
The
figure of six million dead is given in the 'Holocaust' section in Wikipedia,
with three million having died in Poland. Its high 'extermination' figures are
given in counties well to the East of Germany. East Europe was then the
epicentre of world Jewry, and in the years around WWII a vast diaspora of Jews
took place, mainly into what became the Soviet Union, but also Palestine and
America. Poland had 10% of its total population Jewish in the 1930s and the
Polish premier had 'stated repeatedly that there were a million too many Jews
in Poland'[17] so the pressure on them to emigrate was not solely due to
German policies. British rule in Palestine disintegrated in 1938, which meant
that its strict immigration quotas ceased to apply. A very careful estimate of
East Europe's Jewish population ascertained that there were
2.6
million in Poland at the outbreak of the war - less than the total Polish
'deaths' given by Wikipedia. It put total worldwide mortality of Jews through
WWII at 1 14 million, of which most was due to 'Soviet barbarism' rather than
German labour-camps [18]. That seems quite comparable to the figure given
above. Within the Nazi labour-camps, around four hundred and fifty thousand
Jews died.[19]
Around
500,000 prisoners were registered in the labour-camps of Auschwitz in Poland,
of which some 130,000 died [20]. Bodies were there disposed of by individual
cremation, and the records for coke fuel consumption over the period February
1942 October
1943
for the cremation ovens indicate that around five thousand bodies were then
burnt. That accords with the number of registered, deceased inmates, viz those
who had died from natural causes [21], who had to be cremated rather than
buried because of the great typhoid epidemics. This demonstrates that no
mass-incineration of bodies took place. Josef Kramer, a supervisor at the
Auschwitz camp, gave a statement after the war which is recommended by
Professor Butz as probably genuine: it had 350-500 deaths per week happening
over May-November 1944, all from natural causes, a very high figure because
sick prisoners were sent there, and the dead were all cremated. He believed
the camp held up to 100,000 prisoners, mainly Poles and Prussians. [22]
The
Final Solution
An Export Program
The
'Final Solution' of Adolf Hitler retained a single meaning right through WW2,
central to the program of 'National socialism,' and signified the deportation
of Jews, generally eastwards to Poland and Russia [23].
This
program did not change at any point, e.g. the Wannsee conference of 1942, [24]
to signify deliberate extermination. If that practice ever happened, it was
not a centrally-directed policy and did not involve gas chambers: many tons of
documentation of 'third Reich' policies remains, and no-one has been able to
find therein any hint of such a meaning of intentional genocide. The
historical record fails to show any central decision to exterminate Jews by
Nazi Germany.
The
Gestapo and Zionists were collaborating in the late 30s because they had in
this respect similar aims. [25] But, a German Foreign Office circular bulletin
of June 22, 1937 stated that: 'In view of the anti-German agitation of
international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation of a Palestine
Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the nations of the
world'.[26] International Jewish organisations twice declared war on Germany,
in 1933 then again in 1939[27]. As the 'final solution' policy[28] was
thwarted by the Allies, the camps became places of hard labour; then under the
impact of Allied terror-bombing ravages of disease and famine took place.
No
Documents!
At
the Auschwitz trial held at Frankfurt in the mid-sixties, the court had to
conclude that it lacked 'almost all the means or evidence available in a
normal murder trial' including 'the bodies of the victim, autopsy reports,
expert reports on the cause of death, evidence as to the criminals, murder
weapons, etc[29].' Far from leading to doubt, this gave to the mythic gas
chambers a metaphysical status, doubt of which was forbidden. 'No documents
have survived, perhaps none ever existed,' concluded the Holocaust historian Léon
Poliakov. [30]
'In
the case of the rush to impute to the Nazis a programme for the extermination
of millions of people which has implausibly left no material traces, all the
normal rules of historiography seem not only to have been suspended, but to
have been violated over and over again. Historians routinely cite documents
from secondary works like Raul Hilberg's The Destruction of the European
Jews (1961) or from printed collections of documents, such as Robert Wolfe's
Holocaust: The Documentary Evidence - but they never cite original documents.
[31]
The
nearest we have to primary-source documents concerning what went on within the
camps, comes from the bulky, three-volume International Red Cross Report
published in 1948. This and especially Volume III describes the couple of
thousand regular, routine inspection-visits that its doctors made through the
war years to the Polish labour-camps. Their report never hints at any
gas-chamber, nor any mass-cremations. While maintaining a politically neutral
position [32], it confirms that mortality in the camps was to a large extent
caused by the allied terror-bombing. [33] Likewise Winston Churchill's bulky,
six-volume account of the War gives no allusion to the subject, especially
volume Six, Triumph and Tragedy where one would expect to have some allusion
if he believed it had happened.[34]
The
head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated Dec. 28,
1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration camps. It sharply criticised
the high death rate of inmates due to disease, and ordered that "camp
physicians must use all means at their disposal to significantly reduce the
death rate in the various camps." Furthermore, it ordered: "The camp
doctors must supervise more often than in the past the nutrition of the
prisoners and, in cooperation with the administration, submit improvement
recommendations to the camp commandants ... The camp doctors are to see to it
that the working conditions at the various labor places are improved as much
as possible." The directive stressed that "the Reichsfuhrer SS
[Heinrich Himmler] has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be
reduced."[35] A further letter to all concentration camp commanders dated
20th January, 1943, reaffirmed that 'every means must be used to lower the
death rate.' By September 1943 Auschwitz still had mortality peaking at
80/day, viewed as 'catastrophic' by the SS administration. Thus, from
authentic documents concerning the need to reduce fatalities at the Auschwitz
camp, the world has moved to a belief in genocide, with not a single
authentic, supporting document [36].
The
Auschwitz camp was set up as an industrial plant using the giant coalfields of
Poland, and located at the confluence of rivers; it was essential to the
war-effort - it would have made no sense to start exterminating its inmates.
The
Hamburg judge Wilhelm Staeglich had
been positioned near Auschwitz during the war and had on various occasions
dropped into the camps around there.
The
conditions seemed fairly tolerable, he recalled, and certainly nothing
resembling an extermination program existed. In particular, he had discerned
no fear of mistreatment amongst the inmates. He published a testimony to this
effect in 1973, and in return for his shocking news a German inquisition
forced him to resign his job, stripped him of his doctoral degree, and banned
his book. He was then subjected to police raids. His book, translated into
English, is an essential text. [37]
German
military radio messages were successfully decrypted at Bletchley Park using
the 'enigma' codebreaker. Concerning the labour camps, over the period Spring
1942-February '43, the following information was obtained: 'The return from
Auschwitz, the largest of the camps with 20,000 prisoners, mentioned illness
as the main cause of death, but included references to shootings and hangings.
There were no references in the decrypts to gassings.'[38] That seems clear
enough - though no-one took any notice of it at Nuremberg.
No
Photos!
Not
only is there no trace of 'Third Reich' documentation [39] for what is
alleged, but no photographs exist showing anything resembling such a
group-gassing procedure. Do you believe that Jews both male and female
stripped then marched into the gas chambers, then were hauled out in piles? If
so, are you willing to believe that neither the very-thorough Germans nor the
clever Jews wanted or were able to get a single picture of this ultimate
horror? Go to Google and search you'll find rows of emaciated bodies, dead of
typhus, will that do? I don't think so.
US
air-photographs taken in 1944 (released in 1978) when the 'program' was
supposed to be in full swing do not show any huge crematoria burning corpses
nor queues entering the 'gas chambers: 'The few air photos of Auschwitz-Birkenau
known to date from the period of December 1943 to February 1945 show no signs
of fuel depots, smoke from chimneys or open fires, burning pits or pyres. The
photos were altered: Zyklon B input hatches, groups of inmates, and walls
around crematoria were retouched onto the photo negatives To this day there is
no air photo evidence to support the alleged mass murder of the Jews at any
location in Europe occupied by the Germans during World War Two.That the
photos in western hands were altered in order to incriminate Germany, and were
first published by the CIA, is also very significant indeed.'[40]
The
Fabrication of Untruth
Let's
hear a couple of testimonies concerning the dreaded gas-chambers. An Austrian
woman, Maria Van Herwaarden, testified about her camp experiences in a Toronto
District Court in March 1988, as she had been interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau
in 1942 for having sexual relations with a Polish forced laborer. On the train
trip to the camp, a Gypsy woman told her and the others that they would all be
gassed at Auschwitz.
Upon
arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go into a large
concrete room without windows to take a shower. The terrified women were sure
that they were about to die. But then, instead of gas, water came out of the
shower heads. Auschwitz was no vacation center, Maria confirmed, and she
witnessed the death of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly typhus,
and quite a few committed suicide. But she saw no evidence at all of mass
killings, gassings, or of any extermination program.[41] A Jewish woman named
Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when
25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily.
She
likewise testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of "gas
chambers" during the time she was interned there. She heard the gassing
stories only later. [42]
The
Allied carpet-bombing destroyed the supply lines for the Camps, and so the
death-toll mounted from famine and disease. Leaflets were dropped from the
air, alleging that at Auschwitz a 'final solution'/extermination of Jews
policy was being conducted, using gas. [43] That was the genesis of the story,
as those Allied-propaganda leaflets were believed. Greeted by the sight, of
rows of famished Jews who had died of e.g. typhoid, it was not hard to see its
confirmation. 'Far from it being common knowledge in Germany that people were
being gassed the vast majority of Germans were horrified by the United Nations
accusations and they protested that they had never heard of such acts until
after the cessation of hostilities when they had begun listening to United
Nations broadcasts . Since the British Broadcasting Corporation had been
broadcasting these accusations regularly for many months before the end of the
war, those Germans who had "common knowledge" of the gassing before
the war's end most likely got this "knowledge" from the BBC!'[44]
The gas-chamber legend was born in December 1941, when the German author
Thomas Mann declared on the BBC that, in German hospitals, the severely
wounded, the old and the feeble were culled with poison gas. This was the
'first appearance of gas chambers in propaganda.'[45]
As
to how the stories got going, here is a remark by Faurisson: 'The Foreign
Office saw the new rumors of the Second World War only as Jewish inventions,
and many in American circles shared that conviction [46].
Edward
Benes, President of Czechoslovakia (in exile in London), announced in November
1942, after inquiry by his staff, that the Germans, contrary to what had been
reported to him, were not exterminating the Jews. The American Jew, Felix
Frankfurter, a Supreme Court judge, stated to Jan Karski on the subject:
"I can't believe you." In August of 1943, Cordell Hull, Secretary of
State, warned the U.S. ambassador in Moscow by telegram that in planning a
joint Allied statement on "the German crimes in Poland", it would be
advisable to eliminate any mention of the gas chambers, since, as the British
pointed out, there was "insufficient evidence" in the matter[47]
The
Hoax of Nuremberg
A
modern inquiry needs to start from the data-fabrication at Nuremberg by the
US/UK, using systematic assassination and torture of witnesses. The Nuremberg
trials started in 1946 with the image of six million dead as firmly
established.[48] This did not emerge as a conclusion from the trials, but in
its immensity it was presented to the tortured and/or beaten[49] Nazis as a
fact, and would they confess their part in it? All the main defendants at
Nuremberg insisted that prior to the trial they had not known of any mass
murder of Jews: except that Rudolf Höss, the former Commandant of Auschwitz,
signed on March 15, 1946, a document averring that he had overseen the
slaughter of two and a half million Jews, and this was read out on 15th April
at Nurnberg. That day signified the birth of Auschwitz's horror-myth. Two
weeks earlier, Höss had remarked:
“Certainly,
I signed a statement that I killed two and half million Jews. I could just as
well have said it was five million Jews. There are certain methods by which
any confession can be obtained, whether it is true or not."[50]
Decades
later, an account was published of how Höss had been tortured for three days
and nights without sleep by a British army team in order to extract that
statement.[51] In a letter to his wife, Höss apologised for his 'confessions'
and explains that they had been extracted from him under torture[52].
The
victorious Allies could not have their 'truth' come out at Nuremberg, without
the assistance of torture. In 2001, Patricia Meehan discussed the network of
secret "Direct Interrogation Centres" the British had set up in
their occupational zone of Germany[53] - torture chambers, to prepare
'evidence' for the upcoming trials. A Zionist influence was noted at the
Nuremberg trials, [54] not least concerning the figure of six million.[55]
Weighty
books are in print as memorials to 'the Holocaust', but, let's hear a
sceptical view from Down Under:
"Yet
in the case of the Holocaust, the dearth of material evidence for the
existence of large-scale extermination programme is not perceived as
significant. It is assumed that the Nazis destroyed their vast death machinery
so thoroughly as to preclude all possibility of post-war detection. It is not
permissible to express doubts as to whether the Nazis could really have
eliminated all material evidence so completely, including making the ashes of
six million people vanish from the locations at which they must have been
interred. To think such doubts is to engage in thought crime.
'The
reality, therefore, is that the bulk of the 'evidence' for the Holocaust
derives from a corpus of documents that was expressly manufactured by the OSS
and OCC in 1945-46 for the purpose of incriminating the leaders of the former
German government at Nuremberg. The procedure went roughly along these lines:
the Documentation Division in Paris created 'copies' (in English only),
certified them as true, and sent them to the prosecution in Nuremberg, while
the original documents (if they ever existed) were never seen or heard of
again. German translations of the original English texts were then prepared
and sent to the defense in Nuremberg, where they arrived as late as possible
so that the defense had insufficient time to worry about such matters as their
authenticity.
'Starting
in May 1945 with the alleged suicides of SS-General Hans-Adolf Prützmann, SS
head Heinrich Himmler and SS-General Odilo Globocnik while in British
captivity, there followed a bizarre string of murders of individuals
associated with the Auschwitz concentration camp. (These were perpetrated by a
Jewish hit squad known as the DIN.) As Joseph Bellinger, author of a new book
on Himmler's murder, points out, within six months or so of the war's end
practically any one who could have shed light on the Jewish policy of the
Third Reich was murdered!' This, it must be said, was extremely convenient for
the prosecution at Nuremberg. [56]
At
Nuremberg, the German war-generals as well as being tortured had their wives
arrested, to dissuade them from making inappropriate remarks in court. They
were kept in solitary confinement to prevent their comparing notes, as each
was presented with the Great Untruth and asked to believe it. Finally, most of
them were hanged, by a court which felt free to invent new laws, and to act as
prosecutor, judge, lawyer and
executioner:
American justice!
Coming
of the Truthseekers
In
the post-war years, anyone claiming to have a personal memory of the German
gas-chambers would be liable to have Paul Rassinier turn up on their doorstep.
Having himself experience the hell of the Buchenwald camp he was far from
being a fan of the Nazis; but, neither was he prepared to endure fabricated
stories on the subject. He spent years travelling about Europe with his
tape-recorder and questions, but always he found that the witnesses came out
with 'evasions or palpable lies,' and his published report concluded:
With
regard to the gas chambers, the almost endless procession of false witnesses
and of falsified documents to which I have drawn the reader's attention during
this long study, proves, nevertheless, one thing: never at any moment did the
responsible authorities of the Third Reich intend to order - or in fact order
the extermination of the Jews in this or any other manner.[57]
That
bold conclusion (for which he was, naturally, jailed) kick-started the
'revisionist' movement! We may here note that the money which the FRG keeps
paying out to 'holocaust survivors' does enormous damage here, in stimulating
'memories' and generating such averred cases.
Revisionist
Pioneers: David Irving, Ernst Zündel, and Germar Rudolf
Robert
Faurisson investigated the configuration of the alleged Auschwitz 'gas
chambers,' then Zundel [58] got to hear of this. At a historic 1985 trial in
Toronto, witnesses were grilled for the first time ever over the existence of
the alleged 'gas chambers,' and it was found that no such testimony would
stand up.
Faurisson
was an advisor to Zundel in this trial, and a subsequent one, and this duo
just kept on winning the arguments. The prosecution could come up with no
credible witnesses for a gas-chamber's existence:
"
in 1988, during the second trial against Ernst Zündel, the public prosecutor
deemed it prudent to abandon any recourse to witnesses. Canadian justice had
apparently understood the lesson of the first trial: there were no credible
witnesses to the existence and operation of the 'Nazi gas chambers'.
Little
by little, every other country in the world has learned this same lesson. At
the trial of Klaus Barbie in France, in 1987, there was talk about the gas
chambers of Auschwitz but no one produced any witnesses who could properly
speak about them. All the while in France, during several revisionist trials,
Jewish witnesses sometimes came to evoke the gas chambers but none of them
testified before the court as to having seen one or having participated in a
homicidal gassing by hauling bodies out of the 'gas chambers'.
"Today,
gas chamber witnesses are making themselves extremely scarce and the Demjanjuk
trial in Israel, which once again has revealed how much false testimony is
involved in the matter, has contributed to the suppression. Several years ago,
it happened that I was aggressively questioned at the rear of a law court by
elderly Jews who presented themselves as "living witnesses to the gas
chambers of Auschwitz", showing me their tattoos. It was necessary for me
only to ask them to look me in the eyes and to describe for me a gas chamber
that inevitably they retorted: "How could I do this? If I had seen a gas
chamber with my own eyes I would not be here today to speak with you; I myself
would have been gassed also.""[59] (Faurisson)
The
study of history cannot exist without dissenting views, and who would want to
read a history journal that did not allow this? One fails to understand why
'revisionism' should be reprehensible, and Jews especially should be relieved
to discover that their ancestors were never subject to such a horror.
Bestselling
author David Irving, who has written over a dozen books on WWII, was recently
jailed [60]. His definitive, 700- page blockbuster Hitler's
War gave no hint that the Fuhrer ever got to hear of a gas chamber, or
gave any extermination command! Irving is known for the care with which he
checks out his primary-source material. In 1991 his publisher, Macmillan,
destroyed all their copies of his books.
Irving
has paid quite a price for the truth he discovered.
In
November 1991 Fred Leuchter was about to speak at Chelsea Town Hall (invited
by David Irving), when he was arrested onstage by the police at the request of
the Board of Deputies of British Jews, and deported back to the United States.
So much for freedom of speech. When his trailblazing 'Leuchter
Report' was first published in 1989, the House of Commons denounced it
as 'Nazi propaganda' and a 'fascist publication' (on July 20th, with 100 MPs
voting). Even the House of Commons, however, cannot alter the laws of
chemistry: the durability of the ferrocyanide ion is now pivotal to the
Holocaust debate!
We
are not likely to get important insights unless the 'thoughtcrime' penalty is
lifted from the German people, and they are allowed to review their own past.
The
definitive modern textbook, Dissecting
the Holocaust has chapters by some twenty different authors over six
hundred pages. [61] In 1995 the German Government demanded that all copies be
confiscated and burnt![62] Edited by Germar Rudolf, it draws its inspiration
from the pioneer labours of Ernst Zundel.
While
in Tennessee and publishing 'revisionist' material, he was seized by the
police and thrown into solitary confinement in a Canadian jail [63]. After two
years he was transferred to Germany, where his trial now progresses. He
recently (October 2006) read to the court an open letter from the Iranian
president to Germany's chancellor - to the judge's fury. The letter said, in
effect, that Germany had been on its knees before Zion for fifty years and it
was time to get up [64].
Here
are conclusions which Professor Robert Faurisson (University of Lyon) has
drawn:: [65]
·
that there was neither an order, nor a plan, nor a budget for the alleged
genocide of the Jews;
·
that 'Wannsee' was at best only a "silly story";
·
that there existed no specialist's report on the weapon of the crime
concluding that 'the building (whether intact, "reconstructed", or
in ruins) served as a homicidal gas chamber';
·
that there is no autopsy that would allow us to conclude: 'This is the corpse
of a deportee killed by poison gas'[66]
·
that the confession of Rudolf Höß was no longer of any value ("Höß
was always a very weak and confused witness");
·
that their alleged witnesses had probably never seen gas chambers or gassings
inasmuch as the best of them, the famous Rudolf Vrba, in 1985, had been
obliged to admit before a Canadian judge and jury that in his famous book on
the subject he had made use of "poetic licence" or "licentia
poetarum";
·
that the "Jewish soap" had never existed;
·
that the figure of four million victims at Auschwitz was only a fiction;
·
and that from 1942 to 1945, certainly at Auschwitz, but probably overall, more
Jews were killed by so-called 'natural' causes [starvation, disease, sickness
and overwork] than by 'unnatural' ones.
At
the recent Tehran conference, Faurisson summed up his case more succinctly
·
They cannot invoke a single document proving the crime.
·
They are unable to provide the least representation of the crime weapon.
·
They do not possess any proof nor even any evidence.
·
They cannot name a single truthful witness[67]
Forbidden
Doubt and Fictional Horror
Doubt
anything in our modern world, scoff at sacred texts, no-one will care - except
that one kind of doubt is forbidden to you, which will land you in jail in
ten different nations! You can read the Hammer-horror account in, e.g.,
Auschwitz by Lawrence Rees (2005): every
hour or so, a thousand naked Jews were marched (somehow) into a room with
space for maybe one or two hundred, the doors are locked, then the Zyklon-B is
poured down special chutes or holes in the ceiling (which did not exist in the
war, they were added later), then after the screaming stops 'powerful fans'
remove the poison gas. In your dreams, Mr Rees.
There
were no such powerful fans. But, then what? The mass of bodies will be mixed
up with the Zyklon-B, and that is specifically designed to keep emitting the
cyanide gas slowly. How is anyone supposed to shovel out this tortured mass of
corpses mixed up with poison powder? Remember there are only ordinary-sized
doors, mostly opening inwards. It’s an unthinkable nightmare that could not
possibly have worked, and would certainly have gassed any workers trying to
operate it. It is the 'safe' design of this insecticide material, which would
have prevented it from functioning in this deliriously-imagined manner.
No
German government existed after the war - that was the 'unconditional
surrender' which the Allies demanded. By losing both its senior military staff
and government, Germany was in effect decapitated - necessary for the illusory
version of events to be perpetrated. The verdicts of Nuremberg were made final
and binding for the post-war FRG. Germany has since paid a hundred billion
Deutschmarks to Israel by way of Holocaust-compensation clearly, that needs to
be refunded. Germany should take the advice of Iranian leader Ahmadinajad and
stop paying it, because that funding provides undue motivation for holocaust
'memories.' Germany is helping to maintain the holocaust legend,[68] by thus
aiding the state of Israel.[69]
The
United Nations has now established its annual Holocaust Remembrance Day on 27
January, as of 2006.
On
this anniversary, we all need to mull over the faking of history and the
Greatest Lie Ever Told. As Perseus gazed at the Medusa only via a mirror, to
avoid being petrified, we too need calm reflection and the power of Truth to
avoid our collective destruction.
END
NOTES
[1]
'Starting in April 1945, the United States Army and the French Army casually
annihilated about one million men, most of them in the American camps,' a part
of the US-UK-Russia plan 'to destroy Germany as a world power once and for
all' James Bacque Other Losses London 1989 p.xix.
[2]
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=55888
[3]
Fred Leuchter, Auschwitz: the First Forensic Examination of Auschwitz: London,
1989; 1988, Toronto.
www.zundelsite.org/english/basic_articles/inside.html
For
debate, see: www.codoh.com/gcgv/gc426v12.html
[4]
http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr//
[5]
www.takeourworldback.com/short/rudolfarrested.htm
[6]
http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/>http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/
www.dailynorthwestern.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2006/02/14/43f1778c0f7e0
[7]www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndgcger.html
[8]
www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/014_jam.html
In 1990 the Krakow Forensic Institute obtained somewhat lower values: their
brick samples from Auschwitz 'gas chambers' gave a maximum of 0.6 parts per
million of cyanide ie, hardly a trace:
www.nizkor.org/hweb/orgs/polish/institute-for-forensic-research/table-
three.html
[9]
www.rense.com/general53/aauz.htm,
www.ihr.org/jhr/v15/v15n1p23_Weber.html
[10]
http://judicial-inc.biz/Auschwitz.htm
[11]
Dittlieb Felderer, Anne Frank's diary a Hoax, IHR CA 1979, p.1; http://www.radioislam.org/annefrank/>www.radioislam.org/annefrank/.
[12]Did
Six Million Really die? (Richard Harwood, Historical Review Press, 1975: a
30-page monograph) pp.6, 28. An official German source of June 1940 put the
figure at 3 14 million Jews 'in all the territories now under German control'
(i.e. it excludes Russia). W. Staeglich, Auschwitz a Judge Looks at the
Evidence' IHR 1986, p.29.
[13]
A.R.Butz, The Hoax of the 200th Century (Historical Review Press, 1977,
Brighton, 2003), p.239.
Paul
Rassinier ((Debunking the Genocide Myth
[15]
Ibid p.240..
[16]
Walter Sanning, The Dissolution of European Jewry, IHR 1983, p.27.
[17]
J&D. Kimche, The Secret Roads, the "Illegal Migration of a Peoplee
1954, p.215.
[18]
Ref. 16, pp.32,198.
[19]
Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of "Truth" and
"Memory" ed. germar rudolf, 2003, p. 216:
www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/found.html,
Ch. "Holocaust victims A
Statistical analysis."
[20]
Dissecting
(www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndGraf.html)
section 4.1
[21]
Dissecting (ref 19), p.406.
[22]
There were a network of labour camps around the small town of Auchwitz and
this figure would be their total population. The gas-chamber allegations
centred on the Birkenau (Auchwitz II) camp.
British-intelligence
estimate of 20,000 population (ref. 37) must have been for just one camp.
Kramer's statement alluded to the gassing stories: 'All I can say is that it
is untrue from beginning to end.' Butz (ref 12), p.265.
[23]
In the German endlosung, 'end' signifies 'goal'
and
'aim', at least as much as 'final.'
[24]
The minutes of the Wannsee Conference (Berlin, 20th January 1942) provide
'unambiguous documentary evidence that no extermination program existed:' Butz,
p.212;. For its text, see Staeglich (ref 12), Appendix I.
[25]
Butz p.233.
[26]
Quoted by Zundel,
www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/022_jam.html
[27]
24 March 1933:
www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm,
http://k0nsl.com/k0nsl/detox/Judea1.html
Daily Express headline, 'Judea declares war on Germany;' then again, on 5th
Sept 1939 (8th Sept, Jewish Chronicle) "The Israeli people around the
world declare economic and financial war against Germany holy war against
Hitler's people" declared by Chain Weizmann, Zionist
leader:
Six Million (ref 12) p.4; , For Those Who Cannot Speak M. McLaughlin,
Historical Review Press
1979
p.17. Staeglich, p.57.
[28]
On June 17th 1942, Hitler remarked: 'One could found a state of Israel in
Madagascar,' (Six Million,
p.5)
suggesting that the National-Socialist 'final solution' was then still viewed
as feasible. Many 'Zionists' for whom Palestine was unfeasible looked at
Madagascar.
[29]
Dissecting (ref. 19), p.38. n.119.
[30]
Léon Poliakov, Harvest of Hate, 1979.
[31]
Social Democracy Now website
http://www.blogigo.co.uk/socialdemocracynow/accuse-indictment-academic
-historians-for-their-unprofessional/45/
(February, 2006).
[32]
See Butz' discussion of this Report (ref 13), p.
142ff.
[33]
Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross WW2, 1948, Vol.3.
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2735
[34]
General Eisenhower may have alluded to the subject, in one paragraph: after
the war he visited a 'horror camp' near Gotha, where he saw evidence of 'Nazi
brutality'. D. Eisenhower, Crusade in Europe, 1948, p.408.
[35]
Dissecting, p.289.
[36]
Irving, Nuremberg, p.188 n.16, for absence of German 'holocaust' documents.
[37]
Staglich, ref. 12.
[38]
British Intelligence in World War Two, HMSO, 1981 F.Hinsey Ed., Vol. II,
p.673.
[39]
For discussion of an alleged statement by Himmler concerning extermination,
see Butz (ref.13) p.193.
[40]
J. C. Ball, Air Photo Evidence,
www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndaerial.html
[41]
www.ihr.org/leaflets/auschwitz.shtml
www.ihr.org/books/kulaszka/21herwaarden.html
[42]
Abrams, Voices from the Holocaust p.196
[43]
In the Anne Frank 'Diary', she gets to hear in October 1942 about Jews going
to gas-chambers, solely via the 'English radio: The Diary of Anne Frank, Pan
1989, pp.43, 130; Felderer (ref. 11), p.13.
[44]
www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p261_Lindsey.html.
The story appears in a 1944 War Refugee Board report German Extermination
Camps: Auschwitz and Birkenau, Washington, Executive office of the President,
the WRB being 'an instrument of the World Jewish congress:'
Butz
p.66-7; Staglich p.93-8.
[45]
Butz, p.174.
[46]
"The whole propaganda which started about Auschwitz abroad was initiated
by us with the help of our Polish comrades It is no exaggeration when I say
that the majority of all Auschwitz propaganda, which was spread at that time
all over the world, was written by ourselves in the camp." Bruno Baum,
communist' (Dissecting, p.115).
[47]
www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndfaurpref.html
[48]
David Irving, Nuremberg the Last battle (1996):
US
judge Robert Jackson was initially advised of the 'six million' figure by
influential Jews: 'Chapter 4, The Origin of six Million.'
[49]
'All but two of the Germans [on trial at Nuremberg], in the 139 cases that we
investigated, had their testicles kicked in beyond repair. This was standard
operating procedure with our American investigators:' 23.1.49, The Sunday
Pictorial (quoted in For Those Who Cannot Speak (ref. 27), p.21.
[50]
Höss spoke these words to Moritz von Schirmeister in a car on his way to
Nurnberg on 1st April, 1946:
www.rense.com/general68/Höss.htm.
Faurisson states that Bernard Clarke, Höss's chief torturer, was Jewish, but
this is not in Butler's book. Irving (ref 47), p.241.
[51]
Rupert Butler, Legions of Death 1983, pp.237-8; Dissecting, p.96; Staeglich
(ref. 12), pp.193-216.
[52]
The letter is preserved: Irving, Nuremberg, p.246.
[53]
Patricia Meehan, A Strange Enemy People: Germans under the British 1945-50,
2001.
[54]
According to The Jewish Chronicle, the World Jewish congress 'had secured the
holding of the Nuremberg trials at which it had provided expert advice and
much valuable evidence' (16.12.49):
McLaughlin,
Nuremberg and other war crime Trials, Historical Review Press, 1979, p.54.
[55]
For Zionists occupying top positions at the Nuremberg trials, see Butz (ref
13) p.30.
[56]
Ref. (31).
[57]
Rassinier (ref. 14) p.270.
[58]
www.zundelsite.org/
[59]
www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndwitness.html
[60]
www.ihr.org/newsletters/ihr_update_december_2006.pdf;
released,
December 2006.
[61]
Ref. 19.
[62]
www.codoh.com/found/found.html.
Academics protested against this search-and-destroy operation:
www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Holocaust.html
In
2005 G.R. Rudolf deported from America:
www.rense.com/general68/scientistgermar.htm.
[63]
Zundel was charged for the crime of having promoted the pamphlet Did Six
Million Really die? (ref
11)
This brilliant pamphlet, banned in many nations, has sold in hundreds of
thousands in various languages, and let us hope it will come to be studied by
every schoolchild.
[64]
www.zundelsite.org/zundel_persecuted/sept11-06_letter.html
[65]
Dissecting, preface:
http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/fndfaurpref.html.
[66]
US forensic pathologist Dr Charles Larsen performed autopsies in 1945 at
Dachau and other German labour-camps. He is quoted as saying to a newpaper in
1980:
'There never was a case of poison gas uncovered:'
www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=55.
But, his biography Crime Doctor (J.D.McCallum, Canada 1979) has him saying
that at Dachau 'a relatively few of the inmates I personally examined were
murdered in this manner,' viz. by cyanide pellets: these were, he reckoned,
'mercy killings' only for psychotic prisoners, p.61.
[67]
He found Butz' book to be still the best one on the topic, with which one may
agree. A Paris court found Faurisson guilty (February 2005) of the crime of
Holocaust denial, for affirming on Iranian TV, 'There was never a single
execution gas chamber under the Germans.' He presided over the
Holocaust-re-evaluation conference at Tehran, December 2006. See his excellent
lecture there given:
http://www.ziopedia.org/content/view/2676/58/
[68]
The Six Million Reconsidered, Ed W. Grimsted, Hist. Rev. Press 1977.
[69]
www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/022_jam.html
Taken
from: www.CODOH.com
__________________
I
did not come to the conclusion that the holocaust was a fraud because of what
the revisionists said, I came to the conclusion because of what the holocaust
historians said themselves!
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=14359
The
Bible would never have taken off if US law enforcement agencies had been
around. They would smother the sublime quest of mankind in its infancy,
sending the twelve sons of Israel into foster care in Sodom, for their good
old sire had four wives and loved them all. On second thought, the Bible would
not even have come that far either, as their ancestor Abraham, this fountain
of our faith, would have been locked up for the same sin. That is, if he had
not been locked up earlier for teaching his children at home, instead of
sending them to the Pharaoh’s school www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/03/07/MNJDVF0F1.DTL,
or
for giving birth at home
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_birth#Legal_situation_in_the_United_States
.
Every
aspect of normal behaviour mankind was used to, has become criminalised in the
new American legality.
In
the beginning of April, hamfisted Texan police
swooped on a remote Mormon ranch, and arrested the men and carried away the
women and their children and babies, separating them from their mothers . A
judge allowed separating even nursing breastfed babies, giving them to foster
care. www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN0731079920080408
This
snatching case, where the police took away 437 children and babies from their
parents who preferred to live an alternative communal family lifestyle, has
advanced the US well beyond any grim vision of totalitarianism ever envisaged
by real-life politicians. Americans have already entered the realm of extreme
social engineering trod by the LSD writer Aldous Huxley. In that realm of the
United Totalitarian States, happy families are being broken up, and hundreds
of babies and children are given into adoption to single gender couples.
People have lost their children to the state for failing to expose them to the
moronising power of the TV mhtml: mid://00002943/#_edn1 [1], or refusing to
send them to the state schools. Some have lost their lives as well: in Utah, a
John Singer was shot dead for trying to keep his children out of school. The
holocaust of Waco with its dozens of parents and children murdered for no sin
but their sturdy independence was just the first swallow of elimination of
private life in America.
The
Texas police had used a false claim in order to justify their action. They
claimed a member of the family, one Sarah Barlow, had lodged a complaint www.rense.com/general81/flads.htm.
Soon it became clear that the complaint was made by a delusionary outsider
woman with a history of false reports, and probably in cahoots with police.
There
never was a Sarah Barlow. The good wives and daughters of the Texan dissidents
were placed under terrible pressure, amounting to
torture:
they were not even allowed to nurse their babies, unless they bear false
witness against their husbands and fathers. It is amazing that all of them
withstood the torture and remained faithful. What made the Texan police use
such extreme measures against people who peacefully carried on with their
lives?
There
is a good reason for this onslaught on privacy: The policy of Total Spectrum
Dominance promoted by the Neocons does not refer to far away lands only, to
unruly Afghanistan or disobedient France. It refers to you. It is you,
Americans, they want to dominate totally; by controlling your lifestyle and
punishing every free thought and act. And in order to dominate, they need to
smash all compartments; first of all, Family. Nothing may stay between an
individual and the State. By way of projection, your ideologists ascribe this
attitude to your erstwhile enemies, Hitler and Stalin, but as a matter of fact
both arch-villains were strongest supporters of family. Stalin terminated the
free run of wild-eyed feminists he inherited from the Revolution days; while
even today, any reference to family values is considered „pro-Nazi" in
Zionist-occupied Merkel’s Germany. It is to the third force of liberal
totalitarianism that we owe this last and definite attack on Family.
In
a normal world, the Texas kidnapping would be condemned by every voice until
the children were free and back in the custody of their parents, until the
kidnappers were safely locked in jail. Instead, the American papers and
internet sites bother with Tibetan monks‚ inalienable right to own serfs and
the evil Chinamen’s interfering with this right. They discuss whether the
Japanese may eat whales (no, they may not) and whether the US corporations may
consume millions of starving people by turning their food into fuel (yes, they
may). At the same time, they allow the oldest and most natural freedom of
forming family life to be eroded and undermined. Why don‚t presidential
candidates Obama, Clinton and McCain demand safe release of the Texas
prisoners - before the Bush regime rides into sunrise to impose his version of
permissible intercourse on the rest of mankind?
The
enemies of your freedom, the proprietors of your media, have prepared for this
onslaught for a long time. They spread malicious rumours of frequent parental
child abuse to undermine the natural tie between children and parents. They
constructed a fictitious offence of flirting with a girl and called it
„harassment". They invented a „plague of the 20th century",
AIDS, though this malady occupies umpteenth place in the list of dangerous
diseases, well after obesity. They promoted and elevated homosexual activity
on their TV channels and in official propaganda - all that in order to
eliminate family and turn you into obedient tools in their hands.
They
preached to bewildered mankind that whoever objects to their apotheosis of gay
love is but a bigot interfering with a question of personal choice between
consenting adults. Now, in Texas this sophism has come to naught: a group of
consenting adults were arrested and imprisoned for their personal choice - not
for having wild sex, or running orgies, or for disturbing the peace, but for
forming a steady and caring relationship of polygamous marriage, like the one
approved by the Hebrews of old and by the entire East, by the Muslims, Hindus,
Buddhists of our own day, in short, by the vast majority of mankind. If there
is narrow-minded bigotry, it is the American persecution of alternative
families. Alleged persecution of pederasts in Iran is peanuts comparing with
this attack on the most traditional way of family life in America.
Polygamy
or monogamy? This is ultimately a question of local custom and personal
preference. The East allows for polygamy, the West allows for sodomy. The East
is not worried by age difference, the West lives in fear of underage wedlock.
Apparently, the Eastern gentleman prefers marital bliss with a few nubile
beauties at once; the Anglo-American man likes to be buggered by an elderly
gentleman. For this reason, the Anglo-American man is forever trying to move
eastwards, to escape into the realm of sexual freedom, or - if this man is
content with his part - to conquer and eliminate this realm. This could be a
good explanation of MiddleEastern wars, the War of Pederasts against
Polygamists, surely not a worse one than oil or Jews: in the unforgettable
words of George W.
Bush,
„they [the Americans] attack us [the East] because they hate and envy our
freedom", that is, the Eastern freedom to marry a few wonderful women
without going through divorce.
The
sturdy villagers of my Palestine do practice polygamy, as I described
elsewhere: „I stayed at Hassan’s hospitable house, built on his own land
in Yanoun. Hassan is over eighty, a strong and stately old man in grey
galabiye and abaya, a sort of full-length dress with a mantle on top. His
galabiye is girdled up by a broad leather belt, and a sharp short knife hangs
on it. His hands are of good shape and feel as hard as if they were chiselled
from local stone when he shakes my hand.
Last
year Hajj Hassan made the pilgrimage to Mecca, but he is first and foremost a
peasant. Our Lord and Lady of Palestine blessed Hassan. He married, and had a
few sons and daughters, and then he took a second wife, and had had some more,
until he was surrounded by twelve strong sons and pretty daughters. His
spacious three-storied house with smaller outbuildings can compete with the
manor of the Beg. There are many olive trees he planted on the slopes, and
there is a vine with heavy yellow grapes in front of his house. In the morning
the second wife of Hassan, a tall and dignified woman in her sixties, brought
me this thick greenish juice of olive together with a big and round country
bread, hubz baladi, she had baked half an hour ago. Hard white goat cheese,
salty thyme, a bunch of grapes and a glass of sweetish tea with maramiye
(sage) leaves completed the meal. Hassan’s first and elderly wife sat with
us, basking at the winter sun. mhtml:mid://00002943/#_edn2 [2]
It
is normal to have two wives, and it is normal to have one wife, and it is
normal to have no wife at all, as so many monks choose. Moreover, it is normal
to have two husbands, as the mountain folk of Tibet, Ladakh and Nepal do. (In
the West, it is called ménage a trois, and this arrangement allowed Lily
Brick to live happily with Vladimir Mayakovski and Osip Brick.) Every such
arrangement is normal, if agreed by the involved parties. What is abnormal
that’s state interference in the unions of men and women.
The
American State pays too much attention to the sex life of its subjects. In
normal circumstances, the stained dress of Mlle. Levinsky would cause some
anxiety only for her drycleaner; the escapade of Mr Spitzler would annoy his
wife only, while the extended family lifestyle of Texan commune would be just
their own business. Until the 1960s, the police and FBI used to arrest men and
women of different races who dared to congregate - in bed. It is still
embedded in American conscience.
Recently,
a young black American was sentenced to ten years of jail for having oral sex
with a young white girl.
Another
sexual obsession of American authorities is „child pornography‰
interpreted in the widest possible way. FBI agents-provocateurs email Japanese
anime depicting young girls, and then happily assault the receivers of the
emails. Often it has a clear political undertone: an American dissident, an
objector to Iraqi war,
www.readthehook.com/blog/index.php/2008/04/21/iamnota-pedophile-strom-gets-23-months/
Kevin
Strom, was recently sentenced to two years of jail for having an email with a
girlie picture (actually, that of Brooke Shields, the actress) on his
computer. The American Gestapo would lock up Benvenuto Cellini, the great
Florentine, for his enticing hermaphrodite child, and probably the visitors to
Louvre where the statue is presented, as well, just for looking at it.
In
the eternal search for the „hidden hand”, men have produced many unlikely
candidates, from the Masons to the Wise Elders of Zion to the Gray Aliens and
Lizards, or even as the Russian esoteric Alexandre Dougin proposed in jest, a
secret ancient order of women-priestesses pulling and pushing behind the
scenes. In a similar vein, tongue-in-cheek, one can imagine a cabal of old
man-hating butch dykes, or even eunuchs (like in medieval China or Byzantium)
forming the hidden US government, directing the FBI to snatch children and
destroy families in Texas, sending Bush to subdue the Middle East and kill off
the men - both Oriental and American - their natural competitors for female
charms.
We
in Israel have been ruled by our Wise Hags of Zion from Golda Meir up till the
present president of the Supreme Court, Dorit Beinish, and what we do today,
America repeats tomorrow, as http://www.counterpunch.com/niva04282008.html
Steve
Niva noted in his fine essay The New Walls of Baghdad, subtitled The Israeli
Model Surges Toward Iraq. „What we are seeing in Iraq today has much to do
with a deeper and far-reaching "Israelization" of U.S. military
strategy and tactics. Iraq has become virtually caged in a carapace of
concrete walls and razor wire, reinforced by an aerial occupation from the
sky, like Gaza, where 1.5 million Palestinians are now living within an
enclosed cage, while Israel controls access to the essentials of life through
high-tech border terminals and unleashes "penetration raids" and
airborne "targeted killings" when resistance is offered."
These
imaginary ruling harpies can‚t comprehend that women are naturally attracted
to men.
There
is a new Israeli law saying that every act of intercourse between man and
woman is coercive, and if they work in one company, it always constitutes
harassment. In short, there should be no flirtation, no sex either. An Israeli
couple had a long and tumultuous relationship for a few years, making love
everywhere from the company’s strong room to its computer centre, but, when
the relationship soured, the woman brought a complaint for harassment and
coercion, and walked away with a cool hundred thousand dollars. An even better
and newer Israeli bill proposes to fine every customer of a prostitute by a
flat sum of ten thousand dollars - in favour of the prostitute.
Likewise,
the American imitators of the Israeli model can‚t comprehend why some women
prefer to share one man with a few others - or why some men may share one
woman with others, as Abbe Prevost wrote of Manon Lescault. They will forever
ruin your lives, corralling you towards the genderless anti-utopia of Huxley.
As
much as one feels sorry for imprisoned Palestine, devastated Iraq and for
threatened Iran, I can‚t help but feel sorry for you, Americans, the first
victims and the first slaves of the New World Order your country tries to
impose on the rest of the world. We are together in this fight, we have one
enemy, and this enemy is not in North Korea, but in Washington, DC.
http://yourwebapps.com/WebApps/leasing.html
Recommended
reading:
FLDS
Raid - A Dangerous Legal Precedent, By Joel Skousen
4-26-8
http://www.rense.com/general81/flads.htm
