From
the Foreword of the book to be released at the end of September
'The
Afghan Problem' and their camels
by
I. Murray, P. Bianchi, M. Bloomfield, P. Bridge
Hesperian Press,
PO Box 317, Victoria Park, 6979. Western Australia, www.hesperianpress.com
"Afghans"
created many problems in the Australian bush of the 1890s
Foreword
In
the last twenty years there has been a rash of books on “Afghans” in
Australia. Most are marked by a combined reluctance of the authors to do
extensive documented research, and a fawning approach to the subject matter.
That most are written by those influenced by the mental degeneracy that
started spreading through academia in the 1960s, gives some idea of the
origins of the psycho-histories by which we are now epidemically infected.
The
term “Afghan” is of course broadly generic, rather than specific. It
covers a wide range of southern ‘Asiatics’ from places as widespread as
Algeria, Syria, Afghanistan, and India. Their religion, though primarily
Moslem, was as diverse as their origins.
Gus
Luck, one of the earliest European cameleers quotes
Ossman,
a leading camel man, in his autobiography, The
Outback Trail.
“White
men think because some men got dark skin him camel man. My men, one was a
hawker in India, another was coby [dhobi, a washerman] in Calcutta, another
did something else. They not understand camels.”
The
problems of deliberate pollution of critical water supplies, monopolisation
of watering points to exclude white teamsters, undercutting of living wage
transport rates, minimal cooperation with the ‘infidels’, and other
problems are detailed in this text.
Countering
this were the importance of the vast transport structures built up by Tagh
and Faiz Mahomet which kept costs down in the face of the profiteering of
the likes of I. J. K. Cohn.
However
it will be seen in this collection that this turbulent and erratic group was
marked by dissension, murder, contempt of the host peoples, and a general
lawlessness.
The
‘Afghan problem’ of a century ago was resolved by a combination of
factors:–
–
The rising nationalism of Anglo‑Irish Australians.
–
The restriction of alien immigration that threatened the hard fought
freedoms that made Australia the envy of the world, to the extent that our
freedoms influenced the 1905 revolution in Russia.
–The
end of the gold rushes.
–Introduction
of modern transport.
–Public
realisation of the irreconcilable differences between an aggressive anti-Christian
minority and our society.
–World
War I and the fight against the Turks, in which Allied POWs were treated at
a similar level to the later Japanese barbarity.
“The
Stranger within my gate,
He
may be true or kind,
But
he does not talk my talk
I
cannot feel his mind .......
Let
the corn be all one sheaf–
And
the grapes be all one vine,
Ere
our children’s teeth are set on edge
By
bitter bread and wine.”
-
Kipling
Now
those hard-taught lessons have been forgotten, and we have to learn again,
the hard way, that empires and multiculturalism are the enemies of a stable
developing culture and its people. This empire is not one run by bad or
misguided men of our own blood, but by vampires whose interests are only in
their dane-geld and the demonic power that they wield.
The
subtle weapons of propaganda and bribery are not understood. Those who
resist are defamed by terms such as ‘racist,’ in public campaigns
carried out by the alien controlled mass media and their myrmidons, the
presstitutes. The public must remember that ‘sticks and stones,’ (which
it has now increasingly come to) but ‘names will never hurt me,’ and
educate themselves through the study of real history, rather than accepting
rosy palliatives or abuse from the manipulators. Read Ezra Pound, et al.
Inevitably,
the interests of Empire, aka globalism, and its acolytes, clash with that of
economic nationalism. There are those who view all those below them in
social status, or not of a self chosen sect, as not more than slaves,
whether they are black, white, yellow, or brindle, and want total control
and slave labour wherever their tentacles grasp. This elitist monetarist
view is intimately associated with war and conquest, slavery, free trade,
economic looting, cultural degeneration, malthusianism, eugenics, zionism,
and general parasitism. This is the East India Company back as a zombie
death curse upon all the world.
“If
pain, like fire, gave off smoke, the world would be shrouded in eternal
darkness.” Abu T-Hasan Shahid.
The
problem in the dumbed-down society of the West is that few people understand
or realize the incestuous intricacies of this system, and support one or
more of its many pillars without understanding the consequences of their
ignorance.
In
this Dantean pit individuals and groups both serve and conflict with the
interests of international finance and with each other. Knowledge of what
each group represents is essential for the survival of each, and to the
defeat of the financial overlords. Despite the anti-Moslem propaganda spewed
out daily by the mainstream press, the teachings of the Koran are in many
cases complementary to that of the New Testament. It is an early heresy that
has developed its own life. However the best propaganda is the half-lies.
The hidden teachings of the third party are the odd-man. It is prohibited by
law in Australia to expand on this and the literate reader will, no doubt,
realise that sometimes the greatest revelations are, as in classical music,
between the notes. The enemy of my enemy is my friend, with limitations.
Distance makes the heart….
The
modern world is the fight between national development in the interests of a
nation’s people, and the looting of the financier networks.
Privatisation
of our national assets is piratisation. Free trade is not fair trade.
This
applies to all nations. The freedom of all countries, Afghanistan, Iraq,
Iran, Lebanon, Palestine included. While many of the brainwashed will demur,
the corollary of freedom and independence – national development and fair
trade – of these nations, is that the attractions of emigration will
disappear. While the predators rule this will not happen. The conclusion is
obvious.
Precisely
the characteristics that make these people undesirable in a primarily
Christian society, are those that make them a heroic people in the eyes of
all those committed to the demise of globalism and its masters. They are,
paradoxically, in their own countries, our first line of defence, while here
they are an ever increasing fifth column. The Thermopylae of the 21st
Century stretches from the Balkans to the Khyber Pass through societies that
are dangerous, dysfunctional and degenerate, but what happens here defines
our future as free nations. None loved the Spartans, but they held to the
death, and saved the future West, as did the national socialists against the
red beast in the 1940s. Another paradox, the Empire, built on Greek thought,
has been debased by followers of a death cult founded in ancient Babylon,
while the descendants of the dominions of Darius are now the embattled
defenders of that national sovereignity so prized by the Greeks.
The
rise of Islamic fundamentalism as a political force is a derivative of
London’s intelligence operations for the last two centuries. Examine
carefully the role of the older Muslim Brotherhood and the Young Turks, and
a later front, Al Qaeda. Primarily it was aimed at the destabilization of
those nations where there were commercial or strategic interests of the City
of London and its associates. As an example: – Karl Marx, deluded cultural
flotsam, plagiarist, hack writer and pedophile, was controlled by Urquhart
of the British Museum, whose earlier career was that of a Moslem chieftain
in the Caucasus, baiting the Russian Bear. The results of this became
evident in the Crimean War and in the financing of Lenin and Trotsky et
al from the banks of London and New York. At least Berlin had a
strategic reason for accommodating Lenin.
London,
inheritor of Venetian duplicity and degeneracy, has done to itself and the
West, what Venice was planning – the sale of Europe into slavery by the
Mongols/Islam.
Interesting,
and revealing, is that while the Taliban fundamentalists destroyed the
worlds largest opium crops when they came to power, the invasion by US-NATO
forces to implement the new oil pipeline from the central Asian republics,
has led to immense crops harvested and exported via the British Government
supported ‘alliance’ and distributed by the Kosovo Liberation Front (the
Albanian mafia) and the current NATO backed leaders of Kosovo, among others.
This is identical to the Vietnam era SE Asian drug crops used by CIA
operations for off-the-books operations elsewhere, including Australia. All
attempts to eradicate the Afghan crops have failed due to British Government
intervention. Nothing has changed in over 200 years.
Radical
groups, financed by criminal operations controlled by the West, are used
against all who do not pay total obeisance to the financial powers. Before
11 September 2001, the greatest concentration of Islamic terrorists was
based in London, where they were protected by the British Government, and
deployed on terrorist attacks in the Middle East. By that time they had
served their purpose and were ready to be sacrificed as patsys for the real
terrorists in that immense cabbalistic false flag operation run by the
‘invisible hand.’ Previously where chameleon operatives were to be
deployed, they were left wing fronts, such as the Red Brigades, and
Operation Gladio run by NATO.
Australia
has not been immune. Port Arthur and Bali were also false flag operations to
control the perceptions of Australians. Nothing focuses the mind like having
ones crutch in a crush.
In
this shadow world nothing is as it seems. As the poet of Naishapur said,
“For
in and out, above, about, below,
‘tis
nothing but a magic shadow‑show,
play’d
in a box whose candle is the sun,
round
which we phantom figures come and go.”
My
touchstone in dealing with the mainstream media is ‘The more bull dust
there is, the more it is bull dust.’ Anyone who believes that ‘the Arabs
did it,’ is not only by definition clinically insane, suffering from
extreme cognitive dissonance, but willfully ignorant, and immoral. In this
irrationally psychopathic world, it is time for the curtains to be rent and
the puppeteers exposed. Our lives and that of the Earth depend on the Truth.
P
J Bridge, 25 August 2008
___________________________
The
Goldfinger lies keep on rolling in about that stupid gassing story!
_______________________________________________________________________
Amazing escape from Auschwitz gas chamber
Gena Turgel entered the gas chamber at Auschwitz and lived to tell the
tale
Great-grandmother:
Gina Turgel
In
the winter of 1944, the 21-year-old was made to strip naked with her mother
inside the concentration camp's extermination block and wait, but
miraculously the deadly poison was never released. "We were trembling.
I didn't know where we were. Inside, it looked terrible. A woman came in
that I recognised from a previous camp. She was very shocked I was there and
went out again. "We waited a while and then water came through the
walls. It was wonderful. For many weeks we had had no water on our backs. We
were all drinking it.
"As
we came outside, the women there said how wonderful it was to see us. They
screamed with happiness. I didn't understand what they meant. I said 'What
are you shouting about?' "They said 'Don't you know? You were in the
gas chamber.' I lost my voice. I couldn't produce any saliva."
Gena
puts her survival down to a "power over a power" and believes that
God was watching over her. "The woman who came in. I never saw her
again. Perhaps she did something." More than 60 years on, the
great-grandmother still cannot believe how lucky she was to escape death.
"Many times, I have to touch myself to check I'm really alive. One
appreciates life so much."
Found
love
The
81-year-old found something in the death camps that she never expected -
love, in the form of her husband Norman. A Jewish soldier with the British
Intelligence Corps, Norman Turgel was one of the first liberators to enter
Belsen on April 15, 1945 and was charged with rounding up the SS commanders.
Gena,
whose surname then was Goldfinger, was imprisoned in the camp after being
sent there from Auschwitz.
During
late 1944 and early 1945, some 60,000 Jewish inmates from other
concentration camps were transported to Belsen in north-west Germany.
When
the liberators arrived they found more than 20,000 naked corpses of
prisoners, who had starved to death, lying unburied on open ground. Many
survivors were ill with typhus.
Gena
showed Norman around the camp's makeshift hospital wards where she was
working as a nurse and a few days afterwards he invited her to the officer's
mess. For the Sergeant, it had been love at first sight. "When the door
opened, the tables were decorated with white cloths and flowers, which I
hadn't seen for six years," Mrs Turgel said.
"I
asked Norman whether he was expecting any special visitors. He said 'This is
our engagement party'. I didn't know the man, but he was very stubborn. When
he first met me, he made up his mind." She added: "He had
beautiful eyes. I didn't hate him but I was terrified of what I was letting
myself in for."
Her
persistent suitor refused to give up and the pair were eventually married
six months later. The bride's dress was made out of a British parachute and
is now housed in the Imperial War Museum. The couple were married in a
surviving Jewish synagogue in Germany used during the war as a cattle shed.
Journalists greeted their arrival in England, keen to report the love affair
that had blossomed amid the horrors of Belsen.
Siblings
executed
Gena
was born in Krakow, Poland, in 1923. The Nazis began bombing the city in
1939 and by the autumn of 1941 the family had been forced to move into a
nearby cramped, squalid ghetto for Jews.
For
Gena, it was the execution of four of her siblings which haunted her in the
years afterwards. "My eldest brother went down to the sewers to go to
the French resistance. He was caught and shot. My other brother was shot in
the ghetto," she said.
In
1941, her 17-year-old sister Miriam was murdered after the Nazis caught her
trying to bring food into the Plaszov camp, where the family had been taken.
"We had to carry wood for the bodies to be burned. Imagine how my
mother felt carrying wood for her daughter to be burned. "My sister
used to sleep on my left side. My arm is always in a constant chill, even
now."
Moved
on foot to Auschwitz
In
December 1944, Gena, her mother and her other sister Hela were moved on foot
to Auschwitz, walking for three weeks in freezing temperatures as low as
minus 20C. After a few weeks and her encounter with the gas chamber, Gena
and her mother were transported to the Buchenwald concentration camp in
Germany and then shortly after to Bergen-Belsen.
They
were forced to leave Hela behind and never saw her again. Gena, who now
lives in Stanmore, Middlesex, wrote a book about her experiences called I
Light a Candle. Norman, who died nearly ten years ago, contributed a chapter
about what he had witnessed.
Gena
was awarded an MBE in 2000 for services to the Holocaust Foundation. The
couple had worked hard to educate children about genocide. On January 27,
Holocaust Memorial Day, Gena will show the Queen to her seat at the ceremony
for survivors in London.
The
memories of what happened are still all too vivid. "I try to be
occupied all the time," she said. "I have two daughters and a son,
eight grandchildren and three great-grandchildren. It's a wonderful feeling
to have family and to see it all - I was so thankful to God for that."
________________________________
Cambridge
academic says he would not tolerate Jamaican neighbours
By
Aislinn Simpson and Jessica Salter. 01 Sep 2008
George
Steiner asserts that racism is inherent in everyone Photo: AP
A
Cambridge academic and novelist was at the centre of a race row after saying
that he would not be able to tolerate living next door to Jamaican
neighbours "playing reggae all day". George Steiner, 79, said he
believed racism was inherent in everyone and that racial tolerance was
merely skin deep. The playwright and critic Bonnie Greer labelled him a
"cranky old man", while Muslim groups accused him of an
"offensive and lazy" racist generalisation.
But
other academics defended his honesty and right to express such views, saying
they were a valuable addition to an important debate. "It's very easy
to sit here, in this room, and say 'racism is horrible'," he said from
his house in Cambridge, where he has been Extraordinary Fellow at Churchill
College since 1969. "But ask me the same thing if a Jamaican family
moved next door with six children and they play reggae and rock music all
day. Or if an estate agent comes to my house and tells me that because a
Jamaican family has moved next door the value of my property has fallen
through the floor. Ask me then!" Mr Steiner, whose Jewish family fled
to America from Paris before the Nazi invasion of 1940, adds: "In all
of us, in our children, and to maintain our comfort, our survival, if you
scratch beneath the surface, many dark areas appear. Don't forget it."
American-born
Ms Greer said: "He is wrong. People are aware of differences in other
people, but being racist is being someone who sets out to harm someone based
on the colour of their skin. "George Steiner can talk about his own
feelings and talk about what is specific to himself, but to talk of a
Jamaican family like that, this is Britain in 2008, what is he talking
about? "He is a cranky old man and he should sit down and have a cup of
tea. It's quite clear that he doesn't know what racism is."
Inayat
Bunglawala, of the Muslim Council of Britain, expressed surprise at Mr
Steiner's comments, saying his multicultural background and research into
the Holocaust, should have made him more tolerant than most. He said:
"Steiner appears to have made some rather lazy and offensive
generalisations about entire groups of people such as Jamaicans. You would
think he - of all people given his background - would know better by
now."
But
Dr John Allison, a South African-born law lecturer at Cambridge, said it was
important to be open about racism. "There are subtle forms of racism
and less subtle forms, but anything that provokes debate about the issues
and gets them into the open is a good thing," he said.
Dr
Robert Berkeley, deputy director of equality campaign body The Runnymede
Trust, said: "I think it's good to recognise your own racism - and
everyone has their prejudices - so that you can deal with it. Racism is
something we struggle to talk about enough, and I am always happy for there
to be a debate, provided no one is victimised as a result. But
I don't agree with his view."
Although
Cambridge University has worked hard to shed its white, middle-class image
and take on more multicultural staff and students, only 16 per cent of
Cambridge students are from ethnic minority backgrounds and roughly similar
levels of staff. The city itself is overwhelmingly white. Official figures
from the 2001 census reveal that 91 per cent of the city's population is
white British, compared to 87 per cent nationwide, while the black and Asian
populations combined make up little more than one per cent.
Dr
Oke Odudu, a British-Nigerian law lecturer at Cambridge, said he has never
encountered racism during his time there. "The atmosphere of the
university is tolerant and the student population is extremely
diverse," he said. "I never encountered any discrimination. It's a
place where, if you are judged, it's going to be on the basis of academic
performance, not your background." Mr Steiner's interview with a
Spanish newspaper followed the publication of his latest novel, My Unwritten
Books, which is a semi-autobiographic work featuring graphic details of his
sex life.
At
his current home, a substantial redbrick detached 1930s house in Trumpington,
the leafy suburban outskirts of the city, he is likely to be safe from noisy
neighbours, whether white, black or otherwise. All the properties on his
road are set well apart, interspaced with large, well-tended gardens. Asked
by the Daily Telegraph if he now regretted what he said, Mr Steiner
said:"No I do not, but I do not wish to comment further."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2656774/Cambridge-academic-says-he-would-not-tolerate-Jamaican-neighbours.html
______________________________________________
Fredrick
Töben’s Reflections: The Matter of becoming a Mensch
1.
One of the premises on which my world view rests is the physical fact that
humans are a part of nature and that it is wishful-thinking and an
unreasonable assumption to regard humans as superior and better to the fauna
and flora/natural processes, which in fact reveals a limited view of human
nature. My all-inclusive view of human nature may have been inculcated into
my value system because since the late 16th century my family has been a
farming family, which has been intimately connected to the natural life
cycle of birth – marriage – death! The motivational impulse that some
derive through the them-us dialectic, often spiced with hatred, is still
foreign to me. I cannot hate a whole race or ethnic group, as Jew Jeremy
Jones claimed when he began to launch his legal action against me in 1996.
His claim that I was doing my work on the Jewish Holocaust-Shoah because I
hate Jews is a nonsense which, of course, sprang from his Talmudic mindset,
as was so graphically expressed in Jewish-Bolshevik-Soviet excesses in
Russia. There, upon Bolshevik power assumption, the first law to be enacted
made anti-Semitism a capital offence. It was an attempt to protect Jews as a
group because they were the driving force behind the extermination of the
Russian Tzarist Romanov family – on 17 July 1918, now over 90 years ago!
Likewise,
I cannot hate individuals, not even someone like Jeremy Jones who has been
legally persecuting me for over 12 years. I pointed this out in written
submissions to both the HREOC commissioner and to Justice Branson at the
Federal Court of Australia – all to no avail.
2.
These base motives of hatred and envy are, of course, what drove the failed
Marxist ideology and its successor, radical feminism. In both the attempt is
made to sheet home the inevitable pain life’s journey of
three-score-and-ten-years brings with it. Marxist/feminist ideology is set
in a life and death struggle dialectic: thesis = capitalism/man; antithesis
= workers/woman; synthesis = communism/androgynous persons. Now since 16
September 2008 we can add to that the demise of capitalism; but those in the
know have always maintained that both communism and capitalism are just the
two sides of the same coin, i.e. an artificially set dialectic process, much
like the latest 2001 dialectic process 9/11 and its watered down version of
WMD 2003.
3.
The above ideologies did not disappear as the Soviet Union faltered, but
re-morphed within western democracies where they are presented as a
positive, liberating us from oppression, bringing us freedom, democracy and
equality. Upon reflection, however, these concepts ring hollow when we look
at the current state of the world where such concepts that once made up the
post-Marxist/Freudian/Feminist ideology, which still dominate most western
multi-cultural democracies, simply do not reflect the reality of what people
are doing and what they want. The left-right political divide is exhausted
and fails to account for what actual impulses are driving world politics.
4.
A visit to monocultural countries such as Iran and Japan reveals how
wholesome and enriching human interaction can be, where abject poverty and
especially intellectual poverty are generally unknown, and where outright
exploitation through usury is not state policy. There is resistance to
paying CEOs millions while abject poverty flourishes among the population.
5.
Let
me reflect a moment on what farmers think about when they hear the word
‘ideology’. A sheep farmer,
for example, would think about matters of black or pink nose as part of an
awareness of the fact that stock breeding is of primary importance. A
decision needs to be made: to go for either fine wool or fat lambs. Sadly,
such a decision is not solely up to the farmer because the ‘free-market’
manipulators determine that, much as their speculations are currently
determining food and oil prices. As an aside, it is a fact that over 90 per
cent of international capital flow is engaged in speculative activity, not
productivity! Hence the current anticipated crash!
5.1
Now to my sheep story. In Australia and New Zealand during the 1870s the
Corriedale sheep was developed through selective breeding from cross-bred
progeny of pure Merino and Lincoln sheep, thereby creating a dual
purpose sheep with good meat characteristics and commercial wool production.
As
the Corriedale rests on over a hundred thirty years of line breeding it is
sufficiently established as a hybrid vigour sheep.
5.2
To
capitalise on this hybrid effect a farmer needs a breeding plan otherwise he
increases the possibility of confusion and mongrelisation, i.e., a mixing of
male and female sheep, thereby losing the competitive edge in the market
place as far as production improvement is concerned. The full benefit of
hybrid vigour is not reaped if the lambs are being suckled by a pure bred
female. Using a hybrid female and selected pure bred sires is beneficial for
better lamb production.
In-breeding
results when a sheep has an ancestor in common within the last 3 or 4
generations resulting in undesirable characteristics. The trait that suffers
first is the reproductive capabilities, followed by its survival – much
the same as in the human species.
5.2
Genetic manipulation is a matter of fact in sheep breeding. For example, in
1909 Thomas Bond in Lockhart NSW was breeding sheep using Saxon/Peppin
Merinos crossed with Lincoln rams. Then in 1984 an
historic meeting of about 14 stud breeders was held in Lockhard and the Bond
sheep breed was formally established. Twenty-four years later only about 8
studs remained and of those only 3 or 4 are still active. A bond sheep has
similar characteristics to Corriedale except that Bond, like Merino, has a
pink nose, while Corriedale has a black nose.
5.
3
Generally, farmers must remember that in the long run there is always the
need to return to type otherwise degenerative characteristics develop. For
example, in one breeding program a farmer obtained from CSIRO – the
Australian government research station at Armidale, NSW – three
Booroola rams, which were specifically bred for their high fecundity, to
produce 1 to 4 lambs. A halter is placed around a ram’s neck
containing a coloured crayon so that when the ram mates it leaves a mark on
the sheep’s back. In this way a farmer finds out which ewe was mated by
which ram. In this example, the farmer found that one colour was not found
on the ewes but rather on the other two rams instead, meaning that one ram
was homosexual and did not mate with the ewes. Another ram left his colours
on the ewes and on the one ram, meaning he was bisexual. The CSIRO replaced
the homosexual ram without any fuss because, so the explanation, among the
highly bred rams such thing happens. With the introduction of another
heterosexual ram the bisexual ram performed well with the ewes.
5.4
A word about wool production.
Compared
with cotton or oil products, wool is three times more expensive to produce.
If oil prices continue to increase, then the cost of synthetic
products based on oil will also rise. This may re-invigorate the ailing wool
industry, perhaps as a boutique-cottage industry where all kinds of sheep
breeds will be around.
5.
5
What happens in the animal world of breeding also occurs within humans where
in-breeding, among other things, can become a problem. For example, twin
males who mate with outside-the-group females will have different offspring.
Here we would have to find out if mother or father were pure breeds whom we would
class as F1 = first filial generation. A breed can only be developed by
increasing the level of homozygous genes within its population. In order to
maintain a breed it is essential
to
make sure that all these genes remain homozygous
because
50 per cent of hybrid vigour is lost in F2s.
5.6
A
final comment of a political nature: Had Adolf Hitler’s eugenic program
succeeded, then there would perhaps be now over 300 million Germans –
horror of horrors! – and the Nordic peoples would not be in danger of
disappearing
on
account of having lost their self-preservation instinct through incessant
global propaganda that aims to break down the self-preservation mechanism.
Abortions and a reduced procreation urge – the homosexual world demeaning
those who seek to procreate as “breeders” -
has
been weakened in Europeans and so the destruction of this breed is almost
guaranteed – unless?
6.
It is still a normal concern for whites/Europeans – and ironically
expressed often by those who have NOT themselves
procreated
– to view with concern the anti-white racism that clearly contradicts all
the nonsense spouted forth from the ideologically-driven western democracies
about freedom and democracy.
7.
Why
should
it be a moral imperative for Europeans to self-destruct by not breading
anymore, or by mixing with non-Europeans? Why are Jews, for example,
especially since the end of WWII and since the founding of the racist
Zionist state of Israel, UP-breading, to create a white,
blond,
blue-eyed group of Jewish people? And why are they especially
interested in conquering the Germanic peoples – as is attempted
through
the controlling of the German legal culture through which the original
Germanic peoples are mentally condemned to extinction? Hence Horst
Mahler’s important imperative that Germans, who still want to be Germans,
will need to kill the Jewish God who saturates Germanic cultural endeavours
in the form of the Fremdherrschaft/foreign domination of German life,
especially
in the form of the Holocaust-Shoah ideology.
7.1
Of
course, in Norse mythology the end was the Ragnarok, the Twilight of the
Gods as Valhalla burned, which is so well presented in Richard Wagner’s
opera cycle Der Ring – unless the Europeans make a determined
effort to snap out of their current stupor consisting of political
correctness and multiculturalism.
8.
The following articles are instructive:
-------------------
8.
1 From:
Mel
Fowler
Sent:
Tuesday, July 29, 2008 12:21 PM
Subject:
A Bad and Unhealthy Thought
"A
Bad and Unhealthy Thought" means:
Consider thinking
of the Holocaust (an enormously inflated psychodrama served
up to the world continuously for the past 50 years) as, at
bottom, a secret vision of a future event, something
that it is believed will happen in the future, rather than something
that has already happened. I believe Jews have always seen themselves
as facing a future Holocaust or, to put it another way, Jews have always
suffered from a mentally pre-figured Holocaust. One may see it as a
form of self-deception.
A mentally
pre-figured Holocaust of Jews should be understood as an elaboration of
the ancient theme of Jews as victims, an idea of profound
importance within the psychic structure of Jews. The concept had
to become secret when, by an enormous expansion of the
narrative of Jewish suffering during World War II, the claim of a
Jewish Holocaust during WW II was asserted. This, more than anything
else, dramatically props up and supports the pose that Jews, from
the beginning of their history, have been the victims of others.
The program
by some Jews to take dominion of the world rests on two elements of Jewish
self-characterization or Jewish ideology, the presumption of Jewish
supremacy and the status of Jews as world-class victims –neither
of which can be said to be attractive to the non-Jewish world.
Selling the theme of Jews as victims, will not
succeed if the claim of a Jewish WW II Holocaust is rejected.
You can see why Jews cannot yield to Holocaust revisionism.
A
Bad and Unhealthy Thought: Holocaust is an unspoken, secret idea some
people have of that which they expect will be imposed
upon them in the future - a prospective not a retrospective fate. Holocaust
is a bad and unhealthy thought, which should be washed out of the
mind altogether.
__________________________
8.
2 Man beheaded while traveling across
Canada on Greyhound bus. A
40-year-old man has been charged with the horrific stabbing and decapitation
of a fellow Greyhound bus passenger returning home from a carnival in
Western Canada. New
details on accused in bus beheading: Rosemary
Westwood and Elise Stolte www.edmontonjournal.com
, August
01, 2008
EDMONTON
- An Edmonton man charged with murder in the beheading of a Greyhound bus
passenger worked as a newspaper delivery man. Vince Weiguang Li, 40, worked
in the Clareview area delivering the Edmonton Journal, Edmonton Sun and the
National Post until he left his contract position in April, said his former
employer, Vincent Augert. He returned to delivering papers in the Concordia
area in July. Augert said Li called him three weeks ago, saying he had a job
interview in Winnipeg. That was the last time Augert and Li spoke to each
other.
Li is
accused of stabbing and decapitating Tim McLean, 22. McLean died Wednesday
night on the bus near Portage La Prairie. McLean had been working at Capital
Ex in Edmonton and was taking the bus back home to Winnipeg.
A
40-year-old Edmonton man was identified by RCMP this morning as the man
charged with the fatal mutilation of a fellow passenger aboard a Greyhound
bus Wednesday. Vince Weiguang Li appeared in court in Portage la Prairie
Friday, charged with second-degree murder. James Turner/Winnipeg Free Press
Augert
discovered Li was the man accused in the killing today after another
employee recognized Li's name in the news. Augert looked the story up on the
Internet and identifed Li through photos posted on news websites, he said.
"It's him," he said, adding two of his employees also said they
were "99.9-per-cent sure" that it's him, he said. Li delivered
newspapers on Monday. On Tuesday, he "fell off the face of the
earth," Augert said. Augert called Li's cellphone and said a woman
calling herself Li's wife called him back. "She says to me that 'I
don't know where he is, he had to leave town, it was an emergency,' "
said Augert.
Augert
said Li had worked at a McDonald's restaurant. His delivery supervisor
called him a "nice guy," Augert said. Li appeared in court in
Portage la Prairie, Man., today to face a second-degree murder charge. Judge
Rocky Pollack asked that Li be held in custody pending a court-ordered
psychological evaluation. Pollack indicated he wasn't prepared to make that
order until Li had an opportunity to talk to a lawyer.
When asked
by Pollack if he wanted a lawyer, Li said nothing, keeping his head down the
entire time. However, when the judge asked him if he was exercising his
right not to speak, Li reportedly nodded his head. Li is being held in a
Winnipeg detention centre and is under constant video surveillance. The
Edmonton RCMP's major crimes unit has been asked to help police in Manitoba
investigate, K-Division spokesman Craig Albers said today. Li's next court
appearance is scheduled for Tuesday. With files from the Winnipeg Free
Press
estolte@thejournal.canwest.com,rwestwood@thejournal.canwest.com
© Edmonton Journal 2008
8.
3 Last Updated: 1:01AM BST 02 Aug 2008
Tim
McLean was stabbed 40 -50 times before being beheaded.
The accused assailant, Vince Weiguang Li, faces second-degree murder charges
in the death of Tim McLean, 22, a Winnipeg native, the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police have announced. In a brief court appearance, Li, his face
bruised and swollen, his right hand wrapped in a large bandage, did not
speak and only nodded yes or no to questions from the judge.
According
to reports, McLean had been listening to music and texting friends and
family, his cheek pressed against the window of the bus when his assailant
struck suddenly, stabbing him repeatedly in the chest with a "big Rambo
knife." After pulling out a hunting knife and stabbing McLean as
many as 40 or 50 times, witnesses said, Li displayed the victim's severed
head to horrified passengers who had already fled the bus. The
shocking story has focused worldwide attention on the small Manitoba town of
Portage La Prairie, where the bus was forced to stop. The 37 passengers,
including several children, who escaped the vehicle after the bloodshed
began were later taken to a nearby hotel by the Canadian mounted police.
8.
4.1. AND WHAT DID THE APATHETIC PASSENGERS ON THE BUS DO TO HELP?
8.4.2.
Nothing,
nothing ...continued watching the movie or the real-life murder - what's the
difference? Note how witnesses could report the details of what was
happening, but did nothing to stop the murder. It is easy to overpower one
person -
8.4.3.
That’s
the result of multi-culturalism/hurt feeling culture propagated by the Human
Rights Commission racketeers before whom truth is no defence, and where
moral and intellectual failure of nerve is the norm.
9.
What follows is Gamila Zahran’s regular email service, Arabian
Sights, wherein valuable insights are found about this vexed
problem of human differentiation. The following spells out an aspect of
global suppression and it blames the white/European mindset rather than
differentiating such phenomena by pointing out that two world views operate
here: one works with nature as would the national socialists, and one works
against nature as would the Talmudists who cannot step/think outside their
conceptual prison and behold the wonders of human nature/nature/the
pulsations of the universe but are locked up in a written textual vortex
from which the only escape is madness/self-destruction or oppression/killing
of others.
10.
The extract from the below text spells out this ‘Jewish’ mindset:
“
…I've lived in the West and non-West long enough to know that Race (White
Supremacy) is the quintessence, the prime operative category of the
present global order. The
present order is predicated entirely on White Supremacy as 'ursprung',
or foundational essence. Focusing on Capital alone (as Marxists tend to
do) obscures at least as much as it reveals. It is clear to me that the
oppression(s) of capital are sublated by, and operate within, white
supremacy. It is my contention that any and every specific site of
oppression anywhere on the world stage can be traced, ultimately, to a
single root, to wit: white supremacy. This may seem grossly
reductionist (and I suspect that you are frequently accused of
reductionism and naive over-simplification) but it isn't. It is, quite
simply, the heart of the matter. ….”
-
Read on below Gamila Zahran’s email send…
___________________
From:
Gamila Zahran gzahran@wanadoo.fr Sent:
Wednesday, 30 July 2008 10:50 AM
Subject: Arabian
Sights(2008-07-29) White ownership : Property is Racism...and a response
Arabian
Sights....
_____________________________________
“Unless
we call one white man, by name, a ‘devil’, we are not speaking of any
individual white man. We are speaking of the collective 'white'
man’s historical record. We are speaking of the collective 'white' man’s
cruelties, and evils, and greeds that have seen him act like a devil toward
the 'non-white' man. Any intelligent, honest, objective person cannot fail
to realize that"
"I
might point out here that colonialism or imperialism, as the slave system of
the West is called, is not something that is just confined to England or
France or the United States. The interests in this country are in cahoots
with the interests in France and the interests in Britain. It's one huge
complex or combine, and it creates what's known not as the American power
structure or the French power structure, but an international power
structure. This [racist western] international power structure is used to
suppress the masses of dark-skinned people all over the world and exploit
them of their natural resources."
Malcolm
X
"The
concept of race and alleged racial superiority fit into a social requirement
of a thoroughly exploitative period in the 'development' of Western
(European) man. The idea of race was developed in direct response to the
exploitation of other people, to provide both a pretext and a justification
for the most unjustifiable conduct, the enslavement, murder, and degradation
of millions of human beings"
Dr.
Ashley Montagu -
Quoted from
The Fallacy of Racial Superiority
http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=77
"England,
the great chief of the commercial world, possesses a power that enforces a
grave responsibility. She has the force to civilize. She is the natural
colonizer of the world. In the short space of three centuries, America,
sprung
from her loins, has become a giant offspring, a new era in the history of
the human race, a new birth whose future must be overwhelming."
England's remaining task was to "wrest from utter savagedom
those mighty tracts of the earth's surface wasted from the creation of the
world - a darkness to be enlightened by English colonization."
Samuel
Baker
-
The
Hearts of Darkness: How European Writers Created the Racist Image of
Africa
http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=72
_____________________
In
case you missed it...A MUST READ...White
ownership : Property is Racism
Manuel
Garcia Jr.
"The
operation of capitalism over the last five hundred years has yielded the
result that the greatest share of the world's wealth, and the firmest grip
on the control levers of the world's economy and politics, are held by the
white race. Any group photograph of the leaders of the G8 nations will give
you a clear idea of the current ethnometrics of the bounty of the Garden of
Eden.
The
domestic scene in the United States reflects the global situation: whites
own and control, non-whites scramble for work and life's necessities. We are
speaking here in generalities, not absolutes (social absolutes are
rationally impossible).
To
see the
racial-tribal pith
of capitalism we only have to list the many names it has taken over time:
the exploration for trade routes in the 15th century led to the North and
South American "conquests" during the 16th century (the
destruction of Native American civilizations), the "mercantilism"
of the 17th century (e.g., the Dutch East India Company, the African slave
trade), the "colonialism" of the 18th century (e.g., the British
Empire), and the "imperialism" of the 19th and early 20th
centuries (e.g., the Opium War and Chinese concessions, the annexation of
Hawaii, the Spanish-American and Philippine Wars).
When
the "eminence grise" of the United States, Dick Cheney, speaks
about a "clash of civilizations" he is using white tribal language
for the war against Islam, which is today's primary impediment to the
ambition for global control by white tribal leaders. It is the mania for
control, rather then merely religious bigotry or fanatical avarice, that
fuels the drive for white supremacy. The Iraq War of 2003 to the present is
just the latest incident in a millennium-long drive for white tribal control
that probably started with the European 'Christian' Crusades and the Spanish
war against Islam from about the 11th century.
In
national and world societies where wealth -- property -- is racially and
ethnically concentrated, the defense of property is the defense of racial
preference in favor of the dominant tribe; and the primacy of property
(e.g., corporations, "capital") over individuals, in the
administration of government, laws and "justice", is the
protection of white supremacy"...
http://www.counterpunch.org:80/garcia07162007.html
______________________
A
GREAT RESPONSE, that is as equally a MUST read...
Gopal
Mukerjee, Pune,
India
Hi
Manuel,
You're
right on the money again, pun intended. You get to the heart of the
matter in conflating property (control of all resources and means of
production) and race (white supremacy). Your use of the terms 'white
supremacy', 'white tribalism' instantly sets you apart from other
thinkers on the Left. I've noticed that much of the Western Left avoids
Race and White Supremacy like the plague. Instead, the focus is on
capital and the generalized oppression(s) of oligarchies, power elites
and so forth. I'm in my early forties and I've lived in the West and
non-West long enough to know that Race (White Supremacy) is the
quintessence, the prime operative category of the present global order.
The present order is predicated entirely on White Supremacy as
'ursprung', or foundational essence. Focusing on Capital alone (as
Marxists tend to do) obscures at least as much as it reveals. It is
clear to me that the oppression(s) of capital are sublated by, and
operate within, white supremacy. It is my contention that any and every
specific site of oppression anywhere on the world stage can be traced,
ultimately, to a single root, to wit: white supremacy. This may seem
grossly reductionist (and I suspect that you are frequently accused of
reductionism and naive over-simplification) but it isn't. It is, quite
simply, the heart of the matter.
You are absolutely dead-on when you point out that Islam, or the
Islamic world, is the Tribe's last and final barrier. Take out them
dang Muzzlems and the world is theirs to keep. The Tribe inherits the
earth. Here in India, Islam has had a long and unsavory history of
repeated conquests and gargantuan massacres. The world Hindukush (see
any map of South Asia) means 'slaughter of the Hindus'. Nevertheless,
'Indian culture' at the present time is a syncretistic amalgam of
Hindu, Buddhist, Islamic, Christian and Sikh influences. And
many Hindus (myself included) understand (explicitly or inchoately)
that Islam is the last barrier between Them (Massah-Boss-Bwana-Sahib-Effendi)
and Us (all the darkies of the Third World). I believe this is
understood instinctively by most in the Poor South, which explains why
most of us cheer lustily when the Iraqi resistance does its thing or
when Hezbollah kicks the living shit out of the IDF. We Are All
Hezbollah read a protest banner when Lebanon was being bombed. That
about sums it up. Needless to say, the quarrel is not with individual
'white' people. Whiteness is not so much a matter of pigmentation as it
is about attitudes/institutions. Whiteness is above all a 'structure of
attitude and reference' to quote the mighty Edward Said. It is a
congeries or cluster of powerful institutions crystallized in a solvent
of deep-structural attitudes. I realize I'm preaching to the choir here
but I thought I'd say it anyway.
You
make another very important point about 'outsourcing' as a species of
modern slavery. The point hits rather close to home here in India where
software coolies are now legion. What we have here is a vast phalanx of
clueless, thoroughly depoliticized functionaries who positively revel
in their cooliedom. And no one represents this phalanx better than
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. If you think Tony Blair is a whore
(possibly the Whore of Babylon), you should take a look at Singh. It is
my considered opinion that this sorry excuse for a man has a wretched,
deviant, senile and whimpering sort of erotic/racial fixation on
Emperor George W. Bush. Singh's interaction with Bush isn't based on
policy. It's based on a visceral need to perform fellatio, a pathic and demented
yearning for racial/sexual abnegation. Singh is the ultimate House
Negro, a Third World prison-bitch primus, an alpha Gunga Din in a land
of Gunga Dins. Not Bush AND Singh but Bush/Singh, Hegel's Master/Slave
dialectic made flesh. In other words, expect nothing from the Indian
subcontinent (or is it in-continent?).
Two
centuries ago, Macaulay of the Raj set out to create a nation of
brainwashed and worshipful Natives who loathed themselves (and despised
their own culture) while worshipping the white man and his works. He succeeded
beyond his wildest dreams and Singh is the living embodiment of that
success. Expect no resistance, therefore, from this neck of the woods.
It's upto the 'Islamists' now and a handful of Fidels and Chavezes. The
war in Iraq (and the imminent attack on Iran) has the tacit and
explicit support of the West as a whole. The Tribe has decided
that it's time to show them uppity niggers who's Boss.
Yes,
it IS about peak oil and a terminal grab for the earth's resources. But it
is, above all, a naked, brazen, no-holds-barred assertion of white supremacy,
a last-ditch attempt to turn back the clock to those halcyon days when
the Man reigned supreme with his Bibles and bullets.
The
attempt has already failed, however. Iraq and Afghanistan have together
delivered a savage kick to the crotch. Iran will weigh in with a rather
dramatic and bloody decapitation. Not long from now Bush's epitaph,
visible above the ruins of the Empire, will read: I am Ozymandius King of
Kings; look upon my works ye mighty and despair.
But
there'll be no time despair. We'll be too busy celebrating.
I wish you a golden retirement and happy times with your family. That's what
it's about in the end. Thanks and bye for now. Sincerely,
Gopal
Mukerjee.
____________
Arabian
Sights gzahran@wanadoo.fr
To
subscribe/unsubscribe send a blank message with the appropriate request
in the subject window. Feel free to forward for information and educational
purposes with Signature intact, please!
_____________________________________________________________
From
the Archives Thursday November 22nd 2007
Darryl
Macer is
a Unesco bioethicist who co-authored the recent UN study into reproductive
cloning. In it he explains that the cloning of humans is not yet safe and
can't be morally justified. Here, he talks about his work as an intermediary
between the fields of science and ethics and explains why international
governments must come to an agreement about whether to ban human cloning or
find ways to protect the rights of cloned individuals
Human
embryo clone, used for stem cell research. Photograph: Nicola Mcintosh/Newcastle
University
I
started out studying biochemistry but became interested in bioethics after
reading a work by Martin Luther King Junior, which was probably a strange
way to be introduced. It was a book about social justice called Strength to
Love, and it made me realise how important it is that society uses its
knowledge to construct a just, ethical society.
I
was also interested in the exchanges taking place between people who thought
science was a good thing and those who were against it. There was a lot of
early debate on genetic engineering and reproductive technology in the
1980s, and there seemed to be two different groups in society who couldn’t
talk to each other. I felt it would be useful to become an intermediary
between the technophiles and technophobes, those who like knowledge and
those who dislike it.
I
took a PhD in molecular biology because I wanted to understand the way
scientists think, but the day I submitted my thesis I left the laboratory
for good. I felt I couldn’t continue working as a lab scientist when there
were so many interesting social questions to look at. I started to read
philosophy and history of medicine full time.
Some
people thought it was a bit of a waste of a laboratory scientist, but after
a few years it became clear that bioethics was an interesting area in
itself. I’ve never looked back. I still find that there are a lot of
scientists working on the production of knowledge, but very few on how we
should use it in society.
I am a Christian but I don’t find it hard to reconcile religion with
science. As a scientist, I’ve worked with people of many different faiths
and backgrounds – naturalists, Buddhists, Muslims and agnostics. There are
basically two types of question: the scientific type, which is open to
falsification, or disproving; and another, more important kind of question,
like why is loving people better than hating them? I don’t really find any
conflict between the two types. It’s wonderful to try to understand the
natural world and use technology for the good of people and the environment,
but that's just it: it has to be good, it has to stay within a moral
framework.
It
would be unethical to attempt to clone human beings at the moment, simply
because it’s unsafe. But we need to work out how we’re going to govern
it because inevitably in the future it will be technically safe and
possible. How would concepts like human dignity approach it? To make large
numbers of clones is an affront to that dignity. But it could be done
ethically; maybe in cultures where cloning is the only accepted way to
assist families with reproduction. Some Islamic societies, for instance,
wouldn’t consider using artificial insemination but at the same time would
accept cloning.
Right
now, technically, reproductive cloning probably couldn’t succeed, but
I’m sure that some people are attempting to do it. I’m certain that
embryos are being cloned for therapeutic research. There will always be
those who justify medical research on embryos on the grounds that it helps
fight against diseases like diabetes and Alzheimer’s. Finding the middle
ground is difficult and it’s the challenge of ethicists to do that. We try
to look at the issue from the perspectives of different faith systems as
well as those of the scientific world.
In
1993 I conducted a poll called the International Bioethic Survey, which
asked ordinary people about ethical dilemmas, and one of the questions was
whether they would be for or against genetic enhancement in their children.
An interesting finding was that in Thailand and China there is a lot of
support for eugenic engineering. In western countries there seems to be a
tolerant attitude towards modifying genes for medical reasons and yet a deep
suspicion of doing it for enhancement purposes, but in Asia there isn’t
that distinction. The philosophies of Buddhism, Hinduism and Confucianism
don’t seem to lay down laws against trying to make ourselves better than
we are.
One of the things that drove me and my co-authors to write our report on
human cloning recently was the way the issue was being treated in the UN. In
2005 there was supposed to be a convention to ban reproductive cloning; it
had unanimous support, but when some countries tried to ban embryo research
as well we ended up with a split decision and a weak declaration. It was a
missed chance and one of our main points in the report was that the UN has
to do a better job at governing cloning.
The
danger is that we’ll come to accept the idea of consumer children, or
think that we can select our children from a supermarket catalogue – or we
might clone in order to replace someone we've lost. That attitude is wrong
because clones are inevitably different to the human being they came from.
Even if there are a hundred clones from one person, every one of them is
going to be an individual and has to be treated as such. The same is true
even for a cyborg or any sort of future artificial intelligence creation. It
may sound crazy, but they’re all beings.
•
Darryl Macer was interviewed by Anna
Bruce-Lockhart
http://www.guardianweekly.co.uk/?page=editorial&id=169&catID=8
___________________________________________________
Adolf
Hitler explained – in German!
Ein
Mensch kann daran erkannt werden was er tut, nicht notwendigerweise was er
sagt, sondern TUT. ALLES was Hitler tat war für sein Vaterland. ALLES war
mit einem rein Deutschen Geist durchdrungen. Er war Kriegsheld und guter
Kamerad. Er bereicherte sich nicht, ganz im Gegenteil er lebte frugal und
gab sein gesamtes Vermögen durch sein Buch Mein
kampf erworben der Deutschen
Wohlfahrt.
Er
begründete und finanzierte aus eigener Tasche die Brustkrebsforschung (des
Todes seiner geliebten Mutter wegen). Er war ein Mann der allerhöchsten
kulturellen Stufe, anerkannt als solcher von x-beliebigen Ausländern
wie z.B. David Lloyd George oder Lord Rothmere, damals ein wichtiger
Englischer Politiker. Er war ein guter Maler, Möbel Designer, Archtitekt,
beherrschte x-beliebge wissentschaftliche Gebiete, war ein guter Poet,
hervorragender redner und ein anständiger Mensch. Er gab den Anlass
zum VW und eine Skizze von ihm aus dem Jahre 1924 sieht verblüffend aus wie
der VW von Prof. Porsche. Er gab den Impetus zum Bau der Autobahn, das erste
Langstreckenstrassennetz der Welt; nicht nur das, es war von einer Schönhei
geprägt welches niemals widerholt worden ist und wurde Umweltfreundlich
gebaut als diese Konzept noch nichtmal existierte. Er war seinen
Freunden und seiner Frau treu bis ans bittere Ende.
Er
besass weder Haus, noch Bank Konto, noch Automobil, er war in jeglicher
Hinsicht schlicht. Er verbat das bestialische Schachten von Tieren und
verbat die grausame Vivisektion. Er förderte die Künste und kreiierte
damit die Weltführende Kunst schlechthin welche von den Amerikanern
geziehlt zerstört oder gestohlen wurde. Unter seiner Leitung war die
deutsche Jugend kerngesund und der Deutsche Mensch der glücklichste auf
Erden, die Kriminalität in Deutschland war praktisch non-existent und
Gerichte mussten geschlossen werden da keine `Arbeit´ mehr für sie
existierte - ALL das von Ausländern widerholt gesagt und
nierdergeschrieben.
Unter
seiner Regie errang Deutschland binnen der kürzesten Zeit den Nummer Eins
Rang in der Welt in praktische jeder Disziplin; unter seiner Regie
veranstalteten Deutschland die bei weitem schönsten, fairsten und
erfolgreichsten Olympischen Spiele aller zeiten. Er, der `Rassist´
wurde von Jesse Owens über allen grünen Klee gelobt und verehrt. Über 95
% aller Deutschen verehrten ihn, man kann sagen loebten ihn, denn er war der
Erlöser und schworen ihm FREIWILLIG die Treue.
Dieser
Gigant aller Giganten wurde durch Heimtücke im eigenen Lager gestürzt,
denn ohne Schweine wie Niemöller, Canaris, von Moltke und anderen Bibel-sprüche
klopfendem Unrat hätte Deutschland trotz allem den ihm aufgezwungenen
Krieg gewonnen. Da zu behaupten, oder anzudeuten er wáre
ein Jidd gewesen ist nicht nur lächerlich, sondern ist beleidigend.
Geschichtler wie Zeitgeisthuren Toland usw. haben diese ungeheuerliche Lüge
in den Taum gestellt und solchem Gesindel nachzuplappern ist schlechtweg
unanständig.
www.germancross.com
Gerry Frederics
*
Satirical
outrage, Weekend Australian, 9-10
August 2008
A
French satirist sparked a tug of war over free speech and anti-Semitism
after he published a column on the engagement of President Nicolas
Sarkozy’s son to a Jewish heiress. Maurice Sinet, a veteran cartooniat who
goes under the pen name Charlie Hebdo after he wrote that Jean
Sarkozy planned to become Jewish before marrying Jessica Sebaoun-Darty.
“He’ll go a long way in life that little lad,” Sine added.
According
to The Independent, the Sarkozy and Sebaoun-Darty families threatened
to sue the magazine for alleged anti-Semitism. When the magazine’s editor
asked Sine to retract, he replied: “I would rather cut off my balls.”
“France
is divided again over power and the Jews,” Roger Cohen observed in The
New York Times. “It’s not quite the Dreyfus affair, at least not
yet.”
In
an open letter in Le Monde, 20 writers and politicians
including Paris mayor Bertrand Delanoe, Nobel Peace Prize winner
Ellie Wiesel and philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy defend the paper’s
decision to sack its satirist. Levy, in a front-page commentary drew out the
ugly side of French history from 19th-century anti-Semitic tracts
about money-grubbing Jews through the Dreyfus affair to innuendo about
Sarkozy’s partly Jewish heritage. “We have not made too much of the Sine
affair,” Levy wrote, adding that Sine was poisonous to the point of
unacceptability.
But
columnist Jean-Marie Laclavetine, writing in the same paper, defended Sine.
“We can’t breathe in this country any more,” he complained. “We need
the outrageousness of someone like Sine.”
In
the leftist weekly Marienne, Philippe Cohen said Sine was typical of a large number of
intellectuals, especially on the Ledft, who camouflaged their anti-Semitism
under the guise of anti-Zionism. Laurent Joffrin, editor of Liberation,
agreed that Sine’s gibe reeked of anti-Semitism, “the Association of the
Jew, money and power in one phase which stigmatises the arrivisme
of an individual”.
Le
Nouvel Observateur was dismayed that Liberation
had supported Sine’s sacking. “What has happened in france?” it
asked. “The answer is clear. This matter concerns Jews. And in the past
humour at the expense of Jews has been known to end badly.”
*
Australia
issues first license to clone human embryos
Wed
Sep 17, 2008 6:08am EDT. By
Michael Perry
SYDNEY
(Reuters) - The Australian government has issued its first license allowing
scientists to create cloned human embryos to try and obtain embryonic stem
cells. The in vitro-fertilization firm Sydney IVF was granted the license
and reportedly has access to 7,200 human eggs for its research.
If
the firm is successful it would be a world first, the Australian
government's National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), which
granted the license, said on Wednesday. Scientists in other countries have
made stem cells they believe are similar to embryonic cells using a variety
of techniques, but none have been able to extract embryonic stem cells from
cloned human embryos.
An
Australian ban on the research, known as therapeutic cloning or somatic cell
nuclear transfer, was lifted in December 2006 after a rare conscience vote
in the national parliament.
But
the use of excess IVF embryos and the creation and use of other embryos in
research is restricted by law through national legislation. Human cloning
for reproductive purposes is banned.
Chair
of the NHMRC's licensing committee, Dr John Findlay, said Sydney IVF's
research would be closely monitored.
"They
have been given a license to do therapeutic cloning," Findlay told
Reuters, adding the scientists are not licensed to reach the fetal stage.
"They can go to the stage called blastocyst. They must stop at that
point," he said. The blastocyst is a very early-stage embryo not yet
implanted into the womb.
Findlay
said scientists will try and create stem cells from patients who have
abnormalities or create stem cell lines which will be compatible with
patients which have given the cells.
Initially,
any stem cells extracted would be used to test new drugs to fight diseases
such as muscular dystrophy and Huntington's disease, and later therapeutic
cloning would be used to produce body tissue matched to patients.
The
director of Australians for Ethical Stem Cell Research, David van Gend,
criticized the issuing of the license, saying new technology meant cloning
was no longer necessary.
"We
have regulations in Australia such that the abuses of cloning wouldn't
happen here, we will not get live birth cloning," he told local radio.
"We won't get cloning right through to the fetal stage in order to use
them for organ transplants, but if we teach the world how to clone you can
be quite sure it will be used in less rigorous jurisdictions."
Somatic
cell nuclear transfer is a technique in which DNA from the nucleus of an
unfertilized egg is removed and replaced with the nucleus of an adult cell
such as a skin cell. The technique can be used to create cloned embryos in
order to derive embryonic stem cells for therapeutic purposes, but can also
be used for reproductive cloning.
There
are several types of stem cells. Embryonic stem cells, made from days-old
embryos, are considered the most powerful because they can give rise to all
the cell types in the body.
Sydney
IVF said only eggs that were unusable for IVF because they were immature or
had not been fertilized properly, and which donors had given consent for,
would be used in the research.
The
firm said it will use three different types of cells, embryonic stem cells,
cumulus cells attached to the collected eggs, and skin cells, to produce the
cloned embryos.
Sydney
IVF was the first, in 2004, to extract stem cells from Australian IVF
embryos, and has since extracted and grown 10 more colonies of embryonic
stem cells this way.
(Reporting
by Michael Perry; Editing by Sanjeev Miglani)
http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSSYD19317920080917?feedType=nl&feedName=usmorningdigest
_____________________________________________________________
Living
with NATURE not against NATURE
*
Says
one little piglet to another little piglet: “You know, the farmer’s
feeding us so well because when we’re grown up he’ll want to eat us.”
Replies the other little piglet: “Don’t be stupid, you must be one of
those who believes in conspiracy theories!”
*
Odin
was hand-raised at the zoo. And after he was weaned, his British trainer Lee
Munro discovered his remarkable skill.
a
lump of meat was thrown into a pool of water, Odin would happily dive in
after it. 'He makes a funny face and it's actually to close his nostrils to
stop the water from going into his nose.
'Odin
loves the water and he loves food,' he said. 'Not all big cats will dive and
swim underwater even for meat treats.'
White
tigers are the most rare. They get their white color from an unusual and
extremely rare genetic combination.
*
Conspiracy
Theory – a cat sleeping with a mouse!
*
FT
asks: Did you know that “As a member of the EU, Lithuania is obligated to
research and reconcile its role in the Holocaust”?
